Assessing repeatability of 3D Doppler indices obtained by static 3D and STIC power Doppler: a combined in‐vivo/in‐vitro flow phantom study
ABSTRACT Objectives To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and using conventional static three‐dimensional (3D) power Doppler (PD), for both in‐vitro and in‐vivo models, and to evaluate whether...
Saved in:
Published in | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology Vol. 42; no. 5; pp. 571 - 576 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01.11.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | ABSTRACT
Objectives
To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and using conventional static three‐dimensional (3D) power Doppler (PD), for both in‐vitro and in‐vivo models, and to evaluate whether the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive ‘frames’ in a STIC dataset are consistent and resemble the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler analysis.
Methods
The study was divided into two parts: in the first part (the in‐vitro model) we scanned a flow phantom, while in the second part (the in‐vivo model) we scanned a common carotid artery. Conventional static 3D and STIC‐PD datasets were alternately acquired from these two models. VFI values were assessed from 0.38‐cm3 spherical samples of the main flow region in the static 3D datasets and in every frame of the STIC datasets. The variance of the minimum, mean and maximum VFI values from each STIC dataset was compared with the variance of VFI values from the static 3D datasets.
Results
Ten static 3D and 10 STIC datasets were acquired from each model. Analysis of the in‐vitro and in‐vivo models showed a significant reduction in the variance of VFI values obtained using STIC as compared to static datasets. Additionally, we observed that the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive frames in each STIC dataset were consistent across different datasets and that they resembled the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler in both models.
Conclusions
3D‐PD indices derived from STIC are more stable than those obtained from conventional static 3D‐PD datasets. The curves of VFI throughout a reconstructed cardiac cycle using STIC are repeatable and resemble those obtained by spectral Doppler analysis of the vessel. Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
---|---|
AbstractList | OBJECTIVESTo compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and using conventional static three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler (PD), for both in-vitro and in-vivo models, and to evaluate whether the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive 'frames' in a STIC dataset are consistent and resemble the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler analysis.METHODSThe study was divided into two parts: in the first part (the in-vitro model) we scanned a flow phantom, while in the second part (the in-vivo model) we scanned a common carotid artery. Conventional static 3D and STIC-PD datasets were alternately acquired from these two models. VFI values were assessed from 0.38-cm(3) spherical samples of the main flow region in the static 3D datasets and in every frame of the STIC datasets. The variance of the minimum, mean and maximum VFI values from each STIC dataset was compared with the variance of VFI values from the static 3D datasets.RESULTSTen static 3D and 10 STIC datasets were acquired from each model. Analysis of the in-vitro and in-vivo models showed a significant reduction in the variance of VFI values obtained using STIC as compared to static datasets. Additionally, we observed that the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive frames in each STIC dataset were consistent across different datasets and that they resembled the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler in both models.CONCLUSIONS3D-PD indices derived from STIC are more stable than those obtained from conventional static 3D-PD datasets. The curves of VFI throughout a reconstructed cardiac cycle using STIC are repeatable and resemble those obtained by spectral Doppler analysis of the vessel. ABSTRACT Objectives To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and using conventional static three‐dimensional (3D) power Doppler (PD), for both in‐vitro and in‐vivo models, and to evaluate whether the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive ‘frames’ in a STIC dataset are consistent and resemble the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler analysis. Methods The study was divided into two parts: in the first part (the in‐vitro model) we scanned a flow phantom, while in the second part (the in‐vivo model) we scanned a common carotid artery. Conventional static 3D and STIC‐PD datasets were alternately acquired from these two models. VFI values were assessed from 0.38‐cm3 spherical samples of the main flow region in the static 3D datasets and in every frame of the STIC datasets. The variance of the minimum, mean and maximum VFI values from each STIC dataset was compared with the variance of VFI values from the static 3D datasets. Results Ten static 3D and 10 STIC datasets were acquired from each model. Analysis of the in‐vitro and in‐vivo models showed a significant reduction in the variance of VFI values obtained using STIC as compared to static datasets. Additionally, we observed that the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive frames in each STIC dataset were consistent across different datasets and that they resembled the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler in both models. Conclusions 3D‐PD indices derived from STIC are more stable than those obtained from conventional static 3D‐PD datasets. The curves of VFI throughout a reconstructed cardiac cycle using STIC are repeatable and resemble those obtained by spectral Doppler analysis of the vessel. Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and using conventional static three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler (PD), for both in-vitro and in-vivo models, and to evaluate whether the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive 'frames' in a STIC dataset are consistent and resemble the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler analysis. The study was divided into two parts: in the first part (the in-vitro model) we scanned a flow phantom, while in the second part (the in-vivo model) we scanned a common carotid artery. Conventional static 3D and STIC-PD datasets were alternately acquired from these two models. VFI values were assessed from 0.38-cm(3) spherical samples of the main flow region in the static 3D datasets and in every frame of the STIC datasets. The variance of the minimum, mean and maximum VFI values from each STIC dataset was compared with the variance of VFI values from the static 3D datasets. Ten static 3D and 10 STIC datasets were acquired from each model. Analysis of the in-vitro and in-vivo models showed a significant reduction in the variance of VFI values obtained using STIC as compared to static datasets. Additionally, we observed that the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive frames in each STIC dataset were consistent across different datasets and that they resembled the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler in both models. 3D-PD indices derived from STIC are more stable than those obtained from conventional static 3D-PD datasets. The curves of VFI throughout a reconstructed cardiac cycle using STIC are repeatable and resemble those obtained by spectral Doppler analysis of the vessel. Objectives To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and using conventional static three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler (PD), for both in-vitro and in-vivo models, and to evaluate whether the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive 'frames' in a STIC dataset are consistent and resemble the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler analysis. Methods The study was divided into two parts: in the first part (the in-vitro model) we scanned a flow phantom, while in the second part (the in-vivo model) we scanned a common carotid artery. Conventional static 3D and STIC-PD datasets were alternately acquired from these two models. VFI values were assessed from 0.38-cm3 spherical samples of the main flow region in the static 3D datasets and in every frame of the STIC datasets. The variance of the minimum, mean and maximum VFI values from each STIC dataset was compared with the variance of VFI values from the static 3D datasets. Results Ten static 3D and 10 STIC datasets were acquired from each model. Analysis of the in-vitro and in-vivo models showed a significant reduction in the variance of VFI values obtained using STIC as compared to static datasets. Additionally, we observed that the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive frames in each STIC dataset were consistent across different datasets and that they resembled the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler in both models. Conclusions 3D-PD indices derived from STIC are more stable than those obtained from conventional static 3D-PD datasets. The curves of VFI throughout a reconstructed cardiac cycle using STIC are repeatable and resemble those obtained by spectral Doppler analysis of the vessel. Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Objectives To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and using conventional static three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler (PD), for both in-vitro and in-vivo models, and to evaluate whether the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive 'frames' in a STIC dataset are consistent and resemble the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler analysis. Methods The study was divided into two parts: in the first part (the in-vitro model) we scanned a flow phantom, while in the second part (the in-vivo model) we scanned a common carotid artery. Conventional static 3D and STIC-PD datasets were alternately acquired from these two models. VFI values were assessed from 0.38-cm super(3) spherical samples of the main flow region in the static 3D datasets and in every frame of the STIC datasets. The variance of the minimum, mean and maximum VFI values from each STIC dataset was compared with the variance of VFI values from the static 3D datasets. Results Ten static 3D and 10 STIC datasets were acquired from each model. Analysis of the in-vitro and in-vivo models showed a significant reduction in the variance of VFI values obtained using STIC as compared to static datasets. Additionally, we observed that the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive frames in each STIC dataset were consistent across different datasets and that they resembled the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler in both models. Conclusions 3D-PD indices derived from STIC are more stable than those obtained from conventional static 3D-PD datasets. The curves of VFI throughout a reconstructed cardiac cycle using STIC are repeatable and resemble those obtained by spectral Doppler analysis of the vessel. Copyright [copy 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
Author | Miyague, A. H. Pavan, T. Z. Araujo Júnior, E. Martins, W. P. Polanski, L. Martinez, L. H. Raine‐Fenning, N. J. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: A. H. surname: Miyague fullname: Miyague, A. H. organization: Ultrasonography and Retraining Medical School of Ribeirao Preto (EURP) – sequence: 2 givenname: N. J. surname: Raine‐Fenning fullname: Raine‐Fenning, N. J. organization: University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre Campus – sequence: 3 givenname: L. surname: Polanski fullname: Polanski, L. organization: University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre Campus – sequence: 4 givenname: L. H. surname: Martinez fullname: Martinez, L. H. organization: Sao Paulo Federal University (UNIFESP) – sequence: 5 givenname: E. surname: Araujo Júnior fullname: Araujo Júnior, E. organization: Sao Paulo Federal University (UNIFESP) – sequence: 6 givenname: T. Z. surname: Pavan fullname: Pavan, T. Z. organization: University of Sao Paulo (FFCLRP‐USP), Ribeirao Preto, Brazil – sequence: 7 givenname: W. P. surname: Martins fullname: Martins, W. P. organization: Ultrasonography and Retraining Medical School of Ribeirao Preto (EURP) |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23362022$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqN0c1O3DAQB3CroioL7aEvgCxx4RJ2_BEn5oaW8iEhcSicIzuxwSix0zhhlVufoOoz8iR4l20PPVU-eKT5eaTx_wDt-eANQl8JnBIAupzC4ymhnMgPaEG4kBkUkO-hBUgBWSEk3UcHMT4DgOBMfEL7lDFBgdIF-nUeo4nR-Uc8mN6oUWnXunHGwWJ2gS9C37dmwM43rjYRBz0q502D9YzjqEZXb5TyDf5-f7PCfVgnvHt0hhWuQ6e33vnXn79f3EtY7qpxCNi2YY37J-XH0KVxUzN_Rh-taqP5srsP0cPlt_vVdXZ7d3WzOr_NapZTmRmipGSUUalzLRvgIJrSqqbO02FlbsvaEMFEboFaw7lNvcJqQzUrVEEUO0Qn73P7IfyYTByrzsXatK3yJkyxSr9YMk5pWf4H5QWBHGBDj_-hz2EafFpko3ImCWE8qaOdmnRnmqofXKeGufoTSgLLd7B2rZn_9glUm7SrlHa1Tbt6uLvaFuwNW4yf6A |
CODEN | UOGYFJ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_jum_14720 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2014_12_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rbmo_2013_11_004 crossref_primary_10_7863_ultra_15_05022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2015_06_002 crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_14668 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2020_08_006 crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_14608 crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_13309 crossref_primary_10_1136_archdischild_2014_307522 crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_12558 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_015_0666_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2015_11_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2016_06_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2015_09_013 crossref_primary_10_1002_ajum_12056 crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_12573 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_medre_2017_06_001 crossref_primary_10_7863_ultra_15_01021 crossref_primary_10_1002_jum_14338 crossref_primary_10_1002_jum_14319 crossref_primary_10_1080_01443615_2017_1330323 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. – notice: Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QO 8FD FR3 K9. P64 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1002/uog.12419 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Engineering Research Database Biotechnology Research Abstracts Technology Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Engineering Research Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1469-0705 |
EndPage | 576 |
ExternalDocumentID | 3110035581 23362022 UOG12419 |
Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 123 1L6 1OC 24P 29Q 31~ 33P 3SF 3WU 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5RE 5VS 66C 6PF 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIJN ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACGOF ACIWK ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFZJQ AHBTC AHMBA AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ATUGU AZBYB AZVAB BAFTC BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD ESX F00 F01 F04 F5P FUBAC G-S G.N GNP GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HHY HHZ HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M JPC KBYEO KQQ LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NNB O66 O9- OK1 OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K ROL RWI RX1 RYL SUPJJ TEORI UB1 V2E V9Y W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WIN WJL WOHZO WQJ WRC WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 XV2 YFH ZZTAW ~IA ~WT CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QO 8FD FR3 K9. P64 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-e1a9932329b5b9d0406d8fadc5c5c385f8ce16365f02fe44ffad7fbe2b37a71a3 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0960-7692 |
IngestDate | Fri Aug 16 04:36:23 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 16 09:48:56 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 22:18:19 EDT 2024 Tue Oct 15 23:48:04 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 00:49:14 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Keywords | Doppler ultrasonography three-dimensional imaging spatiotemporal image correlation reproducibility |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3529-e1a9932329b5b9d0406d8fadc5c5c385f8ce16365f02fe44ffad7fbe2b37a71a3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
PMID | 23362022 |
PQID | 1445391134 |
PQPubID | 1006490 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1468342288 proquest_miscellaneous_1447105008 proquest_journals_1445391134 pubmed_primary_23362022 wiley_primary_10_1002_uog_12419_UOG12419 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | November 2013 2013-Nov 20131101 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2013 text: November 2013 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Chichester, UK |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Chichester, UK – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | 2009; 30 2008; 32 2010; 36 2011; 37 2013; 39 2007; 30 2010; 35 2008; 31 2013 1997; 44 2012; 40 2013; 41 24166884 - Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;42(5):608 |
References_xml | – year: 2013 article-title: Influence of attenuation upon three‐dimensional power Doppler indices and STIC volumetric pulsatility index: a flow‐phantom experiment publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 32 start-page: 551 year: 2008 end-page: 559 article-title: Evaluation of the effect of machine settings on quantitative three‐dimensional power Doppler angiography: an flow phantom experiment publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 40 start-page: 431 year: 2012 end-page: 436 article-title: Spatiotemporal image correlation‐derived volumetric Doppler impedance indices from spherical samples of the placenta: intraobserver reliability and correlation with conventional umbilical artery Doppler indices publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 40 start-page: 200 year: 2012 end-page: 206 article-title: Three‐dimensional Doppler evaluation of single spherical samples from the placenta: intra‐ and interobserver reliability publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 36 start-page: 635 year: 2010 end-page: 640 article-title: Correlation between uteroplacental three‐dimensional power Doppler indices and true uterine blood flow: evaluation in a pregnant sheep model publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 30 start-page: 130 year: 2009 end-page: 135 article-title: dual perfusion of human placental lobules as a flow phantom to investigate the relationship between fetoplacental flow and quantitative 3D power Doppler angiography publication-title: Placenta – volume: 36 start-page: 530 year: 2010 end-page: 533 article-title: Three‐dimensional power Doppler: validity and reliability publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 35 start-page: 602 year: 2010 end-page: 608 article-title: Does sphere volume affect the performance of three‐dimensional power Doppler virtual vascular sampling for predicting malignancy in vascularized solid or cystic‐solid adnexal masses? publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 32 start-page: 540 year: 2008 end-page: 550 article-title: Determining the relationship between three‐dimensional power Doppler data and true blood flow characteristics: an flow phantom experiment publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 36 start-page: 392 year: 2010 end-page: 393 article-title: Analysis and acquisition reproducibility of 3D power Doppler publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 30 start-page: 874 year: 2007 end-page: 882 article-title: Contribution of morphological assessment of the vessel tree by three‐dimensional ultrasound to a correct diagnosis of malignancy in ovarian masses publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 31 start-page: 466 year: 2008 end-page: 475 article-title: Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 41 start-page: 98 year: 2013 end-page: 99 article-title: Fractional moving blood volume (FMBV) concept can be applied to 3D power Doppler quantification publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 44 start-page: 1355 year: 1997 end-page: 1365 article-title: Phantom materials for elastography publication-title: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control – volume: 37 start-page: 2160 year: 2011 end-page: 2168 article-title: The “volumetric” pulsatility index as evaluated by spatiotemporal imaging correlation (STIC): a preliminary description of a novel technique, its application to the endometrium and an evaluation of its reproducibility publication-title: Ultrasound Med Biol – volume: 39 start-page: 549 year: 2013 end-page: 550 article-title: Re: spatio‐temporal imaging correlation (STIC): technical notes about STIC triggering and choosing between power Doppler or high‐definition color flow publication-title: Ultrasound Med Biol – year: 2013 article-title: Influence of gain adjustment on three‐dimensional power Doppler indices and on STIC volumetric pulsatility indices using a flow phantom publication-title: J Ultrasound Med |
SSID | ssj0006436 |
Score | 2.2366302 |
Snippet | ABSTRACT
Objectives
To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation... To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and using... Objectives To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC)... OBJECTIVESTo compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 571 |
SubjectTerms | Blood Flow Velocity - physiology Carotid artery Doppler ultrasonography Female Humans Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods imaging Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods Imaging, Three-Dimensional - standards reproducibility Reproducibility of Results spatiotemporal image correlation three‐dimensional Ultrasonography, Doppler - methods Ultrasonography, Doppler - standards Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods Ultrasonography, Prenatal - standards |
Title | Assessing repeatability of 3D Doppler indices obtained by static 3D and STIC power Doppler: a combined in‐vivo/in‐vitro flow phantom study |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fuog.12419 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23362022 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1445391134 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1447105008 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1468342288 |
Volume | 42 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBYhh5JL349t0zKFHnrx7lqyZLk5lWxehbTQZiGHgpFkKVmSWMtmNyE55ReU_sb-ko5ke0NLKaX4ItAIZEYz89mj-YaQN9RRUVgnE6aMSjItbVJkhidD6TB4IUC1OtQ7738Uu-PswyE_XCEbXS1Mww-x_OEWLCP662DgSp8PbklDF_6oj8EpUn6mLA_XuUafb6mjMNLGPCUi9CQXBe1YhYZ0sFz5J1T5K0iNUWb7Hvna7a-5XHLSX8x131z_Rt34ny9wn9xt0Se8b47LA7Ji64fkzn6bX39EvjU5YAxnMLNTdNMNi_cVeAdsBCOPmNXOIOS50b-A1-HHgq1AX0GoTJqYIKXqCr4c7G3CNHRg6xa9AwW4Qx3lJ_WPm-8Xkws_aEfzmQd36i9hehy6Gp9BpL19TMbbWwebu0nbsSExCOSKxKYK8Q6CtEJzXVToIEQlnaoMx4dJ7qSxCAAFd0PqbJY5nMudtlSzXOWpYk_Iau1r-4wAQqdUSCMKjKYZ06pIDadVNdQC3WIqXY-sd7orW7M7x--YjDN03yzrkdfLaTSYkAVRtfWLKIOoiiP2-ZuMkCyQo6HM0-ZclNOG_aOkDGM-Ip8eeRu1u5xoCKBpiXoto17L8aedOHj-76IvyBoNDTditeM6WZ3PFvYlwp65fhXP90_nUACL |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,1378,27936,27937,46306,46730 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbhMxEB5VRQIu_P-EFjASBy6bZO2140VcUENJoSkSJFIvaGV7bYiAdRSSVuXUJ6h4Rp6EsXc3FQghhPZiyWPJq_HMfOvZ-QbgMXVU5NbJhCmjkkxLm-SZ4UlfOgxeCFCtDvXO4wMxmmavDvnhBjxra2Fqfoj1hVuwjOivg4GHC-neOWvoyn_oYnQKnJ8X0NxZaNwwfHtOHoWxNmYqEaMnA5HTlleoT3vrpX_Clb_C1Bhndq_C-3aH9e8ln7qrpe6ab7-RN_7vK1yDKw0AJc_rE3MdNmx1Ay6OmxT7TTir08AY0cjCztFT10TeJ8Q7woZk6BG22gUJqW50McTrcLdgS6JPSChOmpkgpaqSvJvs7ZB5aMLWLnpKFMEt6ig_q36cfj-aHfleM1ouPHGf_TGZfwyNjb-QyHx7C6a7LyY7o6Rp2pAYxHJ5YlOFkAdxWq65zkv0EaKUTpWG48Mkd9JYxICCuz51Nssczg2ctlSzgRqkit2GzcpX9i4QRE-pkEbkGFAzplWeGk7Lsq8FesZUug5st8orGsv7ip8yGWfowVnWgUfrabSZkAhRlfWrKIPAiiP8-ZuMkCzwo6HMnfpgFPOaAKSgDMM-gp8OPInqXU_UHNC0QL0WUa_F9M3LOLj376IP4dJoMt4v9vcOXm_BZRr6b8Tix23YXC5W9j6ioKV-EA_7T9UTBKM |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3dahQxFMdDaaF4o7Z-rdY2ghfezO5OvjZTr6Tr2qqtol3ohTAkmUQXdTJsd1vqVZ-g9Bn7JJ5kZrYoIiJzE8gJZEhyzm9yJv8g9JQ4IjLrZEKVUQnT0iYZMzzpSwfBCwDV6nDeef9A7I7Z6yN-tISet2dhan2IxYZbWBnRX4cFXhWudy0aOvefuxCcguTnChNAvoGIPlxrR0GojYlKQPRkIDLSygr1SW_R9E9Y-SulxjAzuoU-tR2s_y752p3PdNf8-E278T_f4Da62eAnflHPlzW0ZMt1tLrfJNjvoIs6CQzxDE9tBX66lvE-w95hOsRDD9BqpzgkusHBYK_DzoItsD7D4WjSxAQrVRb44-HeDq7CFWxto22sMPRQR_tJeXV-eTI58b2mNJt67L75U1x9Cdcaf8dR9_YuGo9eHu7sJs2VDYkBkssSmyoAHqC0THOdFeAhRCGdKgyHh0rupLFAgIK7PnGWMQd1A6ct0XSgBqmi99By6Uv7AGFgp1RIIzIIp4xqlaWGk6LoawF-MZWugzbascubdXcMHzKMU_DflHXQk0U1rJiQBlGl9fNoA1jFAX7-ZiMkDepoYHO_nhd5Vct_5IRC0Af06aBncXQXFbUCNMlhXPM4rvn43atYePjvplto9f1wlL_dO3jzCN0g4fKNePJxAy3PpnP7GBBopjfjVP8JzjcDUg |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing+repeatability+of+3D+Doppler+indices+obtained+by+static+3D+and+STIC+power+Doppler%3A+a+combined+in%E2%80%90vivo%2Fin%E2%80%90vitro+flow+phantom+study&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound+in+obstetrics+%26+gynecology&rft.au=Miyague%2C+A.+H.&rft.au=Raine%E2%80%90Fenning%2C+N.+J.&rft.au=Polanski%2C+L.&rft.au=Martinez%2C+L.+H.&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.pub=John+Wiley+%26+Sons%2C+Ltd&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.eissn=1469-0705&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=571&rft.epage=576&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fuog.12419&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fuog.12419&rft.externalDocID=UOG12419 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0960-7692&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0960-7692&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0960-7692&client=summon |