Assessing repeatability of 3D Doppler indices obtained by static 3D and STIC power Doppler: a combined in‐vivo/in‐vitro flow phantom study

ABSTRACT Objectives To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and using conventional static three‐dimensional (3D) power Doppler (PD), for both in‐vitro and in‐vivo models, and to evaluate whether...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology Vol. 42; no. 5; pp. 571 - 576
Main Authors Miyague, A. H., Raine‐Fenning, N. J., Polanski, L., Martinez, L. H., Araujo Júnior, E., Pavan, T. Z., Martins, W. P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.11.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract ABSTRACT Objectives To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and using conventional static three‐dimensional (3D) power Doppler (PD), for both in‐vitro and in‐vivo models, and to evaluate whether the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive ‘frames’ in a STIC dataset are consistent and resemble the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler analysis. Methods The study was divided into two parts: in the first part (the in‐vitro model) we scanned a flow phantom, while in the second part (the in‐vivo model) we scanned a common carotid artery. Conventional static 3D and STIC‐PD datasets were alternately acquired from these two models. VFI values were assessed from 0.38‐cm3 spherical samples of the main flow region in the static 3D datasets and in every frame of the STIC datasets. The variance of the minimum, mean and maximum VFI values from each STIC dataset was compared with the variance of VFI values from the static 3D datasets. Results Ten static 3D and 10 STIC datasets were acquired from each model. Analysis of the in‐vitro and in‐vivo models showed a significant reduction in the variance of VFI values obtained using STIC as compared to static datasets. Additionally, we observed that the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive frames in each STIC dataset were consistent across different datasets and that they resembled the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler in both models. Conclusions 3D‐PD indices derived from STIC are more stable than those obtained from conventional static 3D‐PD datasets. The curves of VFI throughout a reconstructed cardiac cycle using STIC are repeatable and resemble those obtained by spectral Doppler analysis of the vessel. Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
AbstractList OBJECTIVESTo compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and using conventional static three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler (PD), for both in-vitro and in-vivo models, and to evaluate whether the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive 'frames' in a STIC dataset are consistent and resemble the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler analysis.METHODSThe study was divided into two parts: in the first part (the in-vitro model) we scanned a flow phantom, while in the second part (the in-vivo model) we scanned a common carotid artery. Conventional static 3D and STIC-PD datasets were alternately acquired from these two models. VFI values were assessed from 0.38-cm(3) spherical samples of the main flow region in the static 3D datasets and in every frame of the STIC datasets. The variance of the minimum, mean and maximum VFI values from each STIC dataset was compared with the variance of VFI values from the static 3D datasets.RESULTSTen static 3D and 10 STIC datasets were acquired from each model. Analysis of the in-vitro and in-vivo models showed a significant reduction in the variance of VFI values obtained using STIC as compared to static datasets. Additionally, we observed that the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive frames in each STIC dataset were consistent across different datasets and that they resembled the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler in both models.CONCLUSIONS3D-PD indices derived from STIC are more stable than those obtained from conventional static 3D-PD datasets. The curves of VFI throughout a reconstructed cardiac cycle using STIC are repeatable and resemble those obtained by spectral Doppler analysis of the vessel.
ABSTRACT Objectives To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and using conventional static three‐dimensional (3D) power Doppler (PD), for both in‐vitro and in‐vivo models, and to evaluate whether the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive ‘frames’ in a STIC dataset are consistent and resemble the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler analysis. Methods The study was divided into two parts: in the first part (the in‐vitro model) we scanned a flow phantom, while in the second part (the in‐vivo model) we scanned a common carotid artery. Conventional static 3D and STIC‐PD datasets were alternately acquired from these two models. VFI values were assessed from 0.38‐cm3 spherical samples of the main flow region in the static 3D datasets and in every frame of the STIC datasets. The variance of the minimum, mean and maximum VFI values from each STIC dataset was compared with the variance of VFI values from the static 3D datasets. Results Ten static 3D and 10 STIC datasets were acquired from each model. Analysis of the in‐vitro and in‐vivo models showed a significant reduction in the variance of VFI values obtained using STIC as compared to static datasets. Additionally, we observed that the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive frames in each STIC dataset were consistent across different datasets and that they resembled the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler in both models. Conclusions 3D‐PD indices derived from STIC are more stable than those obtained from conventional static 3D‐PD datasets. The curves of VFI throughout a reconstructed cardiac cycle using STIC are repeatable and resemble those obtained by spectral Doppler analysis of the vessel. Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and using conventional static three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler (PD), for both in-vitro and in-vivo models, and to evaluate whether the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive 'frames' in a STIC dataset are consistent and resemble the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler analysis. The study was divided into two parts: in the first part (the in-vitro model) we scanned a flow phantom, while in the second part (the in-vivo model) we scanned a common carotid artery. Conventional static 3D and STIC-PD datasets were alternately acquired from these two models. VFI values were assessed from 0.38-cm(3) spherical samples of the main flow region in the static 3D datasets and in every frame of the STIC datasets. The variance of the minimum, mean and maximum VFI values from each STIC dataset was compared with the variance of VFI values from the static 3D datasets. Ten static 3D and 10 STIC datasets were acquired from each model. Analysis of the in-vitro and in-vivo models showed a significant reduction in the variance of VFI values obtained using STIC as compared to static datasets. Additionally, we observed that the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive frames in each STIC dataset were consistent across different datasets and that they resembled the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler in both models. 3D-PD indices derived from STIC are more stable than those obtained from conventional static 3D-PD datasets. The curves of VFI throughout a reconstructed cardiac cycle using STIC are repeatable and resemble those obtained by spectral Doppler analysis of the vessel.
Objectives To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and using conventional static three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler (PD), for both in-vitro and in-vivo models, and to evaluate whether the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive 'frames' in a STIC dataset are consistent and resemble the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler analysis. Methods The study was divided into two parts: in the first part (the in-vitro model) we scanned a flow phantom, while in the second part (the in-vivo model) we scanned a common carotid artery. Conventional static 3D and STIC-PD datasets were alternately acquired from these two models. VFI values were assessed from 0.38-cm3 spherical samples of the main flow region in the static 3D datasets and in every frame of the STIC datasets. The variance of the minimum, mean and maximum VFI values from each STIC dataset was compared with the variance of VFI values from the static 3D datasets. Results Ten static 3D and 10 STIC datasets were acquired from each model. Analysis of the in-vitro and in-vivo models showed a significant reduction in the variance of VFI values obtained using STIC as compared to static datasets. Additionally, we observed that the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive frames in each STIC dataset were consistent across different datasets and that they resembled the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler in both models. Conclusions 3D-PD indices derived from STIC are more stable than those obtained from conventional static 3D-PD datasets. The curves of VFI throughout a reconstructed cardiac cycle using STIC are repeatable and resemble those obtained by spectral Doppler analysis of the vessel. Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Objectives To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and using conventional static three-dimensional (3D) power Doppler (PD), for both in-vitro and in-vivo models, and to evaluate whether the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive 'frames' in a STIC dataset are consistent and resemble the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler analysis. Methods The study was divided into two parts: in the first part (the in-vitro model) we scanned a flow phantom, while in the second part (the in-vivo model) we scanned a common carotid artery. Conventional static 3D and STIC-PD datasets were alternately acquired from these two models. VFI values were assessed from 0.38-cm super(3) spherical samples of the main flow region in the static 3D datasets and in every frame of the STIC datasets. The variance of the minimum, mean and maximum VFI values from each STIC dataset was compared with the variance of VFI values from the static 3D datasets. Results Ten static 3D and 10 STIC datasets were acquired from each model. Analysis of the in-vitro and in-vivo models showed a significant reduction in the variance of VFI values obtained using STIC as compared to static datasets. Additionally, we observed that the curves formed by VFI values obtained from successive frames in each STIC dataset were consistent across different datasets and that they resembled the waveforms obtained by spectral Doppler in both models. Conclusions 3D-PD indices derived from STIC are more stable than those obtained from conventional static 3D-PD datasets. The curves of VFI throughout a reconstructed cardiac cycle using STIC are repeatable and resemble those obtained by spectral Doppler analysis of the vessel. Copyright [copy 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Author Miyague, A. H.
Pavan, T. Z.
Araujo Júnior, E.
Martins, W. P.
Polanski, L.
Martinez, L. H.
Raine‐Fenning, N. J.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: A. H.
  surname: Miyague
  fullname: Miyague, A. H.
  organization: Ultrasonography and Retraining Medical School of Ribeirao Preto (EURP)
– sequence: 2
  givenname: N. J.
  surname: Raine‐Fenning
  fullname: Raine‐Fenning, N. J.
  organization: University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre Campus
– sequence: 3
  givenname: L.
  surname: Polanski
  fullname: Polanski, L.
  organization: University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre Campus
– sequence: 4
  givenname: L. H.
  surname: Martinez
  fullname: Martinez, L. H.
  organization: Sao Paulo Federal University (UNIFESP)
– sequence: 5
  givenname: E.
  surname: Araujo Júnior
  fullname: Araujo Júnior, E.
  organization: Sao Paulo Federal University (UNIFESP)
– sequence: 6
  givenname: T. Z.
  surname: Pavan
  fullname: Pavan, T. Z.
  organization: University of Sao Paulo (FFCLRP‐USP), Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
– sequence: 7
  givenname: W. P.
  surname: Martins
  fullname: Martins, W. P.
  organization: Ultrasonography and Retraining Medical School of Ribeirao Preto (EURP)
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23362022$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqN0c1O3DAQB3CroioL7aEvgCxx4RJ2_BEn5oaW8iEhcSicIzuxwSix0zhhlVufoOoz8iR4l20PPVU-eKT5eaTx_wDt-eANQl8JnBIAupzC4ymhnMgPaEG4kBkUkO-hBUgBWSEk3UcHMT4DgOBMfEL7lDFBgdIF-nUeo4nR-Uc8mN6oUWnXunHGwWJ2gS9C37dmwM43rjYRBz0q502D9YzjqEZXb5TyDf5-f7PCfVgnvHt0hhWuQ6e33vnXn79f3EtY7qpxCNi2YY37J-XH0KVxUzN_Rh-taqP5srsP0cPlt_vVdXZ7d3WzOr_NapZTmRmipGSUUalzLRvgIJrSqqbO02FlbsvaEMFEboFaw7lNvcJqQzUrVEEUO0Qn73P7IfyYTByrzsXatK3yJkyxSr9YMk5pWf4H5QWBHGBDj_-hz2EafFpko3ImCWE8qaOdmnRnmqofXKeGufoTSgLLd7B2rZn_9glUm7SrlHa1Tbt6uLvaFuwNW4yf6A
CODEN UOGYFJ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_jum_14720
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2014_12_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rbmo_2013_11_004
crossref_primary_10_7863_ultra_15_05022
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2015_06_002
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_14668
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2020_08_006
crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_14608
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_13309
crossref_primary_10_1136_archdischild_2014_307522
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_12558
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12884_015_0666_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2015_11_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2016_06_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ultrasmedbio_2015_09_013
crossref_primary_10_1002_ajum_12056
crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_12573
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_medre_2017_06_001
crossref_primary_10_7863_ultra_15_01021
crossref_primary_10_1002_jum_14338
crossref_primary_10_1002_jum_14319
crossref_primary_10_1080_01443615_2017_1330323
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
DOI 10.1002/uog.12419
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1469-0705
EndPage 576
ExternalDocumentID 3110035581
23362022
UOG12419
Genre article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
123
1L6
1OC
24P
29Q
31~
33P
3SF
3WU
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5RE
5VS
66C
6PF
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIJN
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHMBA
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ATUGU
AZBYB
AZVAB
BAFTC
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
ESX
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GNP
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HHY
HHZ
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
JPC
KBYEO
KQQ
LATKE
LAW
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NNB
O66
O9-
OK1
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
ROL
RWI
RX1
RYL
SUPJJ
TEORI
UB1
V2E
V9Y
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WIN
WJL
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
XV2
YFH
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
8FD
FR3
K9.
P64
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3529-e1a9932329b5b9d0406d8fadc5c5c385f8ce16365f02fe44ffad7fbe2b37a71a3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0960-7692
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 04:36:23 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 16 09:48:56 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 22:18:19 EDT 2024
Tue Oct 15 23:48:04 EDT 2024
Sat Aug 24 00:49:14 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords Doppler ultrasonography
three-dimensional
imaging
spatiotemporal image correlation
reproducibility
Language English
License Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3529-e1a9932329b5b9d0406d8fadc5c5c385f8ce16365f02fe44ffad7fbe2b37a71a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
PMID 23362022
PQID 1445391134
PQPubID 1006490
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1468342288
proquest_miscellaneous_1447105008
proquest_journals_1445391134
pubmed_primary_23362022
wiley_primary_10_1002_uog_12419_UOG12419
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate November 2013
2013-Nov
20131101
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2013
  text: November 2013
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Chichester, UK
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Chichester, UK
– name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology
PublicationTitleAlternate Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 2009; 30
2008; 32
2010; 36
2011; 37
2013; 39
2007; 30
2010; 35
2008; 31
2013
1997; 44
2012; 40
2013; 41
24166884 - Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;42(5):608
References_xml – year: 2013
  article-title: Influence of attenuation upon three‐dimensional power Doppler indices and STIC volumetric pulsatility index: a flow‐phantom experiment
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 32
  start-page: 551
  year: 2008
  end-page: 559
  article-title: Evaluation of the effect of machine settings on quantitative three‐dimensional power Doppler angiography: an flow phantom experiment
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 40
  start-page: 431
  year: 2012
  end-page: 436
  article-title: Spatiotemporal image correlation‐derived volumetric Doppler impedance indices from spherical samples of the placenta: intraobserver reliability and correlation with conventional umbilical artery Doppler indices
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 40
  start-page: 200
  year: 2012
  end-page: 206
  article-title: Three‐dimensional Doppler evaluation of single spherical samples from the placenta: intra‐ and interobserver reliability
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 36
  start-page: 635
  year: 2010
  end-page: 640
  article-title: Correlation between uteroplacental three‐dimensional power Doppler indices and true uterine blood flow: evaluation in a pregnant sheep model
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 30
  start-page: 130
  year: 2009
  end-page: 135
  article-title: dual perfusion of human placental lobules as a flow phantom to investigate the relationship between fetoplacental flow and quantitative 3D power Doppler angiography
  publication-title: Placenta
– volume: 36
  start-page: 530
  year: 2010
  end-page: 533
  article-title: Three‐dimensional power Doppler: validity and reliability
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 35
  start-page: 602
  year: 2010
  end-page: 608
  article-title: Does sphere volume affect the performance of three‐dimensional power Doppler virtual vascular sampling for predicting malignancy in vascularized solid or cystic‐solid adnexal masses?
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 32
  start-page: 540
  year: 2008
  end-page: 550
  article-title: Determining the relationship between three‐dimensional power Doppler data and true blood flow characteristics: an flow phantom experiment
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 36
  start-page: 392
  year: 2010
  end-page: 393
  article-title: Analysis and acquisition reproducibility of 3D power Doppler
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 30
  start-page: 874
  year: 2007
  end-page: 882
  article-title: Contribution of morphological assessment of the vessel tree by three‐dimensional ultrasound to a correct diagnosis of malignancy in ovarian masses
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 31
  start-page: 466
  year: 2008
  end-page: 475
  article-title: Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 41
  start-page: 98
  year: 2013
  end-page: 99
  article-title: Fractional moving blood volume (FMBV) concept can be applied to 3D power Doppler quantification
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1355
  year: 1997
  end-page: 1365
  article-title: Phantom materials for elastography
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control
– volume: 37
  start-page: 2160
  year: 2011
  end-page: 2168
  article-title: The “volumetric” pulsatility index as evaluated by spatiotemporal imaging correlation (STIC): a preliminary description of a novel technique, its application to the endometrium and an evaluation of its reproducibility
  publication-title: Ultrasound Med Biol
– volume: 39
  start-page: 549
  year: 2013
  end-page: 550
  article-title: Re: spatio‐temporal imaging correlation (STIC): technical notes about STIC triggering and choosing between power Doppler or high‐definition color flow
  publication-title: Ultrasound Med Biol
– year: 2013
  article-title: Influence of gain adjustment on three‐dimensional power Doppler indices and on STIC volumetric pulsatility indices using a flow phantom
  publication-title: J Ultrasound Med
SSID ssj0006436
Score 2.2366302
Snippet ABSTRACT Objectives To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation...
To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and using...
Objectives To compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC)...
OBJECTIVESTo compare the variability in vascularization flow index (VFI) seen in serial acquisitions obtained using spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC) and...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 571
SubjectTerms Blood Flow Velocity - physiology
Carotid artery
Doppler ultrasonography
Female
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
imaging
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - standards
reproducibility
Reproducibility of Results
spatiotemporal image correlation
three‐dimensional
Ultrasonography, Doppler - methods
Ultrasonography, Doppler - standards
Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods
Ultrasonography, Prenatal - standards
Title Assessing repeatability of 3D Doppler indices obtained by static 3D and STIC power Doppler: a combined in‐vivo/in‐vitro flow phantom study
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fuog.12419
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23362022
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1445391134
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1447105008
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1468342288
Volume 42
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBYhh5JL349t0zKFHnrx7lqyZLk5lWxehbTQZiGHgpFkKVmSWMtmNyE55ReU_sb-ko5ke0NLKaX4ItAIZEYz89mj-YaQN9RRUVgnE6aMSjItbVJkhidD6TB4IUC1OtQ7738Uu-PswyE_XCEbXS1Mww-x_OEWLCP662DgSp8PbklDF_6oj8EpUn6mLA_XuUafb6mjMNLGPCUi9CQXBe1YhYZ0sFz5J1T5K0iNUWb7Hvna7a-5XHLSX8x131z_Rt34ny9wn9xt0Se8b47LA7Ji64fkzn6bX39EvjU5YAxnMLNTdNMNi_cVeAdsBCOPmNXOIOS50b-A1-HHgq1AX0GoTJqYIKXqCr4c7G3CNHRg6xa9AwW4Qx3lJ_WPm-8Xkws_aEfzmQd36i9hehy6Gp9BpL19TMbbWwebu0nbsSExCOSKxKYK8Q6CtEJzXVToIEQlnaoMx4dJ7qSxCAAFd0PqbJY5nMudtlSzXOWpYk_Iau1r-4wAQqdUSCMKjKYZ06pIDadVNdQC3WIqXY-sd7orW7M7x--YjDN03yzrkdfLaTSYkAVRtfWLKIOoiiP2-ZuMkCyQo6HM0-ZclNOG_aOkDGM-Ip8eeRu1u5xoCKBpiXoto17L8aedOHj-76IvyBoNDTditeM6WZ3PFvYlwp65fhXP90_nUACL
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,1378,27936,27937,46306,46730
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NbhMxEB5VRQIu_P-EFjASBy6bZO2140VcUENJoSkSJFIvaGV7bYiAdRSSVuXUJ6h4Rp6EsXc3FQghhPZiyWPJq_HMfOvZ-QbgMXVU5NbJhCmjkkxLm-SZ4UlfOgxeCFCtDvXO4wMxmmavDvnhBjxra2Fqfoj1hVuwjOivg4GHC-neOWvoyn_oYnQKnJ8X0NxZaNwwfHtOHoWxNmYqEaMnA5HTlleoT3vrpX_Clb_C1Bhndq_C-3aH9e8ln7qrpe6ab7-RN_7vK1yDKw0AJc_rE3MdNmx1Ay6OmxT7TTir08AY0cjCztFT10TeJ8Q7woZk6BG22gUJqW50McTrcLdgS6JPSChOmpkgpaqSvJvs7ZB5aMLWLnpKFMEt6ig_q36cfj-aHfleM1ouPHGf_TGZfwyNjb-QyHx7C6a7LyY7o6Rp2pAYxHJ5YlOFkAdxWq65zkv0EaKUTpWG48Mkd9JYxICCuz51Nssczg2ctlSzgRqkit2GzcpX9i4QRE-pkEbkGFAzplWeGk7Lsq8FesZUug5st8orGsv7ip8yGWfowVnWgUfrabSZkAhRlfWrKIPAiiP8-ZuMkCzwo6HMnfpgFPOaAKSgDMM-gp8OPInqXU_UHNC0QL0WUa_F9M3LOLj376IP4dJoMt4v9vcOXm_BZRr6b8Tix23YXC5W9j6ioKV-EA_7T9UTBKM
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ3dahQxFMdDaaF4o7Z-rdY2ghfezO5OvjZTr6Tr2qqtol3ohTAkmUQXdTJsd1vqVZ-g9Bn7JJ5kZrYoIiJzE8gJZEhyzm9yJv8g9JQ4IjLrZEKVUQnT0iYZMzzpSwfBCwDV6nDeef9A7I7Z6yN-tISet2dhan2IxYZbWBnRX4cFXhWudy0aOvefuxCcguTnChNAvoGIPlxrR0GojYlKQPRkIDLSygr1SW_R9E9Y-SulxjAzuoU-tR2s_y752p3PdNf8-E278T_f4Da62eAnflHPlzW0ZMt1tLrfJNjvoIs6CQzxDE9tBX66lvE-w95hOsRDD9BqpzgkusHBYK_DzoItsD7D4WjSxAQrVRb44-HeDq7CFWxto22sMPRQR_tJeXV-eTI58b2mNJt67L75U1x9Cdcaf8dR9_YuGo9eHu7sJs2VDYkBkssSmyoAHqC0THOdFeAhRCGdKgyHh0rupLFAgIK7PnGWMQd1A6ct0XSgBqmi99By6Uv7AGFgp1RIIzIIp4xqlaWGk6LoawF-MZWugzbascubdXcMHzKMU_DflHXQk0U1rJiQBlGl9fNoA1jFAX7-ZiMkDepoYHO_nhd5Vct_5IRC0Af06aBncXQXFbUCNMlhXPM4rvn43atYePjvplto9f1wlL_dO3jzCN0g4fKNePJxAy3PpnP7GBBopjfjVP8JzjcDUg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing+repeatability+of+3D+Doppler+indices+obtained+by+static+3D+and+STIC+power+Doppler%3A+a+combined+in%E2%80%90vivo%2Fin%E2%80%90vitro+flow+phantom+study&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound+in+obstetrics+%26+gynecology&rft.au=Miyague%2C+A.+H.&rft.au=Raine%E2%80%90Fenning%2C+N.+J.&rft.au=Polanski%2C+L.&rft.au=Martinez%2C+L.+H.&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.pub=John+Wiley+%26+Sons%2C+Ltd&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.eissn=1469-0705&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=571&rft.epage=576&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fuog.12419&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fuog.12419&rft.externalDocID=UOG12419
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0960-7692&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0960-7692&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0960-7692&client=summon