Yield Mapping to Document Goose Grazing Impacts on Winter Wheat

• Published in: Agronomy journal Vol. 94; no. 5; pp. 1087 - 1093
• Main Authors: Borman, Michael M., Louhaichi, Mounir, Johnson, Douglas E., Krueger, William C., Karow, Russell S., Thomas, David R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Madison American Society of Agronomy 01.09.2002
• Subjects: Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions; Aquatic birds; Biological and medical sciences; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; General agroecology; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping; General agronomy. Plant production; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development; Winter wheat; Oregon; United States; North America; Washington; America; Plant production; Cartography; Monocotyledones; Overwintering; Browsing; Aerial photography; Wild animal; Experimental study; Spatial variation; Cereal crop; Vertebrata; Gramineae; Angiospermae; Branta canadensis; Spermatophyta; Yield; Aves; Damage; Triticum aestivum
• ISSN: 0002-1962; 1435-0645
• DOI: 10.2134/agronj2002.1087

In southwestern Washington and western Oregon, increasing numbers of wintering Canada geese (Branta canadensis) graze several farm crops including wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Our objectives were to develop methods to determine timing, intensity, and locations of grazing, and to measure the impact of grazing on grain yield. Aerial photography with ground‐truth photography and repeated sampling worked well to determine timing, intensity, and locations of grazing. Exclosures served as nongrazed controls. A yield‐mapping‐system‐equipped combine measured yields. All data collection points were spatially located via differential global positioning system (DGPS) technology, which allowed us to integrate all data spatially and temporally via geographical information system (GIS) technology. Based on yield‐mapping‐system data, goose grazing resulted in grain yield differences ranging from a 16% increase on part of one field to a 25% decrease on an area of a field heavily grazed in April, just before geese migrated north. Comparisons of exclosures (nongrazed controls) with paired plots provided variable results. Results from paired‐plot comparisons for three fields during 1998 were 25% reduction, no difference, and 13% increase in grain yields in the paired plots available for grazing vs. exclosures. Based on yield‐mapping‐system data, the same three fields experienced 19, 7, and 5% grain yield reductions due to goose grazing with the extent of reduction depending on a combination of timing, intensity, and extent of grazing. Paired plots did not adequately represent grazing impacts on the fields. The yield‐mapping system provided nearly complete coverage of the fields and adequately captured grazing impacts.