Statistical analysis of modified complete randomized designs:applications to chemo-orientation studies
Often experimental scientists employ a Randomized Complete Block Design(RCBD) to study the effect of treatments on different subjects. Under a`complete randomization', the order of the apparatus setups within each block,including all replications of each treatment across all subjects, is comple...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of experimental biology Vol. 208; no. 7; pp. 1267 - 1276 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
01.04.2005
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0022-0949 1477-9145 |
DOI | 10.1242/jeb.01523 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Often experimental scientists employ a Randomized Complete Block Design(RCBD) to study the effect of treatments on different subjects. Under a`complete randomization', the order of the apparatus setups within each block,including all replications of each treatment across all subjects, is completely randomized. However, in many experimental settings complete randomization is impractical due to the cost involved in re-adjusting the device to administer a new treatment. One typically resorts to a type of`restricted randomization', in which multiple subjects are tested under each treatment before the apparatus is re-adjusted. The order of the treatments as well as the assignment of subjects to each block are random. If the data obtained under any type of restricted randomization are treated as if the data were collected under an RCBD with complete randomization within each block,then there is potential to increase the risk of false positives (Type I error). This is of concern to animal orientation studies and other areas such as chemical ecology where it is impractical to reset the experimental device for each subject tested. The goal of the research presented in this article is twofold: (1) to demonstrate the consequences of constructing an F-statistic based on a mean square error for testing the significance of treatment effects under the restricted randomization; (2) to describe an alternative method, based on split-plot analysis of variance, to analyze designed experiments that yield better power under the restricted randomization. The statistical analyses of simulated experiments and data involving virgin male Periplaneta americana substantiate the benefits of the alternative approach under the restricted randomization. The methodology and analysis employed for the simulated experiment is equally applicable to any organism or artificial agent tested under a restricted randomization protocol. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Often experimental scientists employ a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) to study the effect of treatments on different subjects. Under a 'complete randomization', the order of the apparatus setups within each block, including all replications of each treatment across all subjects, is completely randomized. However, in many experimental settings complete randomization is impractical due to the cost involved in re-adjusting the device to administer a new treatment. One typically resorts to a type of 'restricted randomization', in which multiple subjects are tested under each treatment before the apparatus is re-adjusted. The order of the treatments as well as the assignment of subjects to each block are random. If the data obtained under any type of restricted randomization are treated as if the data were collected under an RCBD with complete randomization within each block, then there is potential to increase the risk of false positives (Type I error). This is of concern to animal orientation studies and other areas such as chemical ecology where it is impractical to reset the experimental device for each subject tested. The goal of the research presented in this article is twofold: (1) to demonstrate the consequences of constructing an F-statistic based on a mean square error for testing the significance of treatment effects under the restricted randomization; (2) to describe an alternative method, based on split-plot analysis of variance, to analyze designed experiments that yield better power under the restricted randomization. The statistical analyses of simulated experiments and data involving virgin male Periplaneta americana substantiate the benefits of the alternative approach under the restricted randomization. The methodology and analysis employed for the simulated experiment is equally applicable to any organism or artificial agent tested under a restricted randomization protocol. Often experimental scientists employ a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) to study the effect of treatments on different subjects. Under a 'complete randomization', the order of the apparatus setups within each block, including all replications of each treatment across all subjects, is completely randomized. However, in many experimental settings complete randomization is impractical due to the cost involved in re-adjusting the device to administer a new treatment. One typically resorts to a type of 'restricted randomization', in which multiple subjects are tested under each treatment before the apparatus is re-adjusted. The order of the treatments as well as the assignment of subjects to each block are random. If the data obtained under any type of restricted randomization are treated as if the data were collected under an RCBD with complete randomization within each block, then there is potential to increase the risk of false positives (Type I error). This is of concern to animal orientation studies and other areas such as chemical ecology where it is impractical to reset the experimental device for each subject tested. The goal of the research presented in this article is twofold: (1) to demonstrate the consequences of constructing an F-statistic based on a mean square error for testing the significance of treatment effects under the restricted randomization; (2) to describe an alternative method, based on split-plot analysis of variance, to analyze designed experiments that yield better power under the restricted randomization. The statistical analyses of simulated experiments and data involving virgin male Periplaneta americana substantiate the benefits of the alternative approach under the restricted randomization. The methodology and analysis employed for the simulated experiment is equally applicable to any organism or artificial agent tested under a restricted randomization protocol.Often experimental scientists employ a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) to study the effect of treatments on different subjects. Under a 'complete randomization', the order of the apparatus setups within each block, including all replications of each treatment across all subjects, is completely randomized. However, in many experimental settings complete randomization is impractical due to the cost involved in re-adjusting the device to administer a new treatment. One typically resorts to a type of 'restricted randomization', in which multiple subjects are tested under each treatment before the apparatus is re-adjusted. The order of the treatments as well as the assignment of subjects to each block are random. If the data obtained under any type of restricted randomization are treated as if the data were collected under an RCBD with complete randomization within each block, then there is potential to increase the risk of false positives (Type I error). This is of concern to animal orientation studies and other areas such as chemical ecology where it is impractical to reset the experimental device for each subject tested. The goal of the research presented in this article is twofold: (1) to demonstrate the consequences of constructing an F-statistic based on a mean square error for testing the significance of treatment effects under the restricted randomization; (2) to describe an alternative method, based on split-plot analysis of variance, to analyze designed experiments that yield better power under the restricted randomization. The statistical analyses of simulated experiments and data involving virgin male Periplaneta americana substantiate the benefits of the alternative approach under the restricted randomization. The methodology and analysis employed for the simulated experiment is equally applicable to any organism or artificial agent tested under a restricted randomization protocol. |
Author | Pilla, Ramani S. Loader, Catherine Kitska, David J. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ramani S. surname: Pilla fullname: Pilla, Ramani S. organization: Department of Statistics and Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: David J. surname: Kitska fullname: Kitska, David J. organization: Department of Statistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Catherine surname: Loader fullname: Loader, Catherine organization: Department of Statistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15781887$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkTtPwzAUhS0Eog8Y-AMoExJDWtuJE5sNVbykSgzAbDn2NbhK4hC7Q_n1hLYwwMBdrnT0nSPdeybosPUtIHRG8IzQnM5XUM0wYTQ7QGOSl2UqSM4O0RhjSlMscjFCkxBWeJiC5cdoRFjJCeflGNmnqKIL0WlVJ6pV9Sa4kHibNN4468Ak2jddDRGSXrXGN-5j0AwE99qGK9V19eCMzrchiT7Rb9D41PcO2rhVkxDXxkE4QUdW1QFO93uKXm5vnhf36fLx7mFxvUx1xkhMLS4s54yKSilseJHziqmCWyCac1yQosKZEVoTkeEKCDO0HCwVza3AwgDOpuhil9v1_n0NIcrGBQ11rVrw6yCLkmWloORfkIicCkHoAJ7vwXXVgJFd7xrVb-T3CwdgvgN070PowUrtdsfHXrlaEiy_SpJDSXJb0uC4_OX4Cf3DfgI_h5Om |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1242_jeb_036954 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00359_013_0856_0 crossref_primary_10_1242_jeb_01418 crossref_primary_10_1242_jeb_016006 crossref_primary_10_1242_jeb_244254 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1984.tb00715.x 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1984.tb00777.x 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1983.tb00361.x 10.1016/0022-1910(96)00034-0 10.1007/BF01022530 10.1016/0022-1910(87)90036-9 10.1046/j.1365-3032.2000.00178.x 10.1007/s003590050203 10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1988.tb00909.x 10.1046/j.1365-3032.2002.00269.x 10.1007/BF00197655 10.1046/j.1570-7458.1998.00379.x 10.1152/ajpregu.00346.2004 10.1023/A:1016242019571 10.1002/9780470316856 10.1007/s003590050303 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7SS 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1242/jeb.01523 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Animal Behavior Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Entomology Abstracts Animal Behavior Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE Entomology Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Biology |
EISSN | 1477-9145 |
EndPage | 1276 |
ExternalDocumentID | 15781887 10_1242_jeb_01523 |
Genre | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- -DZ -~X .55 .GJ 0R~ 186 18M 2WC 34G 39C 4.4 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6TJ AAFWJ AAYXX ABDNZ ABPPZ ABRJW ACGFS ACIWK ACNCT ACPRK ADBBV ADVGF ADXHL AEILP AENEX AETEA AFRAH AGCDD AGGIJ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL BTFSW C1A CITATION CJ0 CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD F5P F9R GX1 H13 HZ~ H~9 INIJC KQ8 N9A O9- OHT OK1 P2P PQQKQ RCB RHI RXW S10 SJN TAE TN5 TR2 TWZ UKR UPT W8F WH7 WOQ X7M XJT XSW YQT YR2 YVO YZZ ZCA ZXP ~02 3O- AAUTI AAYJJ ABJNI ABTAH ACPVT ACYGS AFFNX AI. CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF MVM NPM PKN RHF UBC VH1 XOL YIN ZGI ZY4 7QG 7SS 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-f06f88529baa0d8648b5a68fe1c880616b03d9cc1930be15d27f06b24f909de03 |
ISSN | 0022-0949 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 11:01:24 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 14:07:15 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:40:00 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:00:33 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:57:25 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 7 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c351t-f06f88529baa0d8648b5a68fe1c880616b03d9cc1930be15d27f06b24f909de03 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
PMID | 15781887 |
PQID | 19429912 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_67537921 proquest_miscellaneous_19429912 pubmed_primary_15781887 crossref_citationtrail_10_1242_jeb_01523 crossref_primary_10_1242_jeb_01523 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2005-04-01 2005-Apr 20050401 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2005-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2005 text: 2005-04-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Journal of experimental biology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Exp Biol |
PublicationYear | 2005 |
References | 2021042510465524900_REF10 2021042510465524900_REF11 2021042510465524900_REF12 2021042510465524900_REF13 2021042510465524900_REF14 2021042510465524900_REF15 2021042510465524900_REF16 2021042510465524900_REF17 2021042510465524900_REF18 2021042510465524900_REF19 2021042510465524900_REF9 2021042510465524900_REF8 2021042510465524900_REF7 2021042510465524900_REF6 2021042510465524900_REF20 2021042510465524900_REF21 2021042510465524900_REF22 2021042510465524900_REF23 2021042510465524900_REF24 2021042510465524900_REF25 2021042510465524900_REF26 2021042510465524900_REF27 2021042510465524900_REF1 2021042510465524900_REF5 2021042510465524900_REF4 2021042510465524900_REF3 2021042510465524900_REF2 J Exp Biol. 2005 May;208(Pt 10):2019 |
References_xml | – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF24 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1984.tb00715.x – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF20 doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF2 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1984.tb00777.x – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF23 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF12 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1983.tb00361.x – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF9 doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(96)00034-0 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF11 doi: 10.1007/BF01022530 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF25 doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(87)90036-9 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF3 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3032.2000.00178.x – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF7 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF14 doi: 10.1007/s003590050203 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF5 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF16 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF1 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF10 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1988.tb00909.x – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF26 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF8 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3032.2002.00269.x – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF22 doi: 10.1007/BF00197655 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF4 doi: 10.1046/j.1570-7458.1998.00379.x – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF15 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF6 doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00346.2004 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF17 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF21 doi: 10.1023/A:1016242019571 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF13 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF18 doi: 10.1002/9780470316856 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF19 – ident: 2021042510465524900_REF27 doi: 10.1007/s003590050303 – reference: - J Exp Biol. 2005 May;208(Pt 10):2019 |
SSID | ssj0000654 |
Score | 1.7911613 |
Snippet | Often experimental scientists employ a Randomized Complete Block Design(RCBD) to study the effect of treatments on different subjects. Under a`complete... Often experimental scientists employ a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) to study the effect of treatments on different subjects. Under a 'complete... Often experimental scientists employ a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) to study the effect of treatments on different subjects. Under a `complete... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 1267 |
SubjectTerms | Analysis of Variance Animals Male Models, Statistical Periplaneta - physiology Periplaneta americana Random Allocation Regression Analysis Research Design Smell - physiology |
Title | Statistical analysis of modified complete randomized designs:applications to chemo-orientation studies |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15781887 https://www.proquest.com/docview/19429912 https://www.proquest.com/docview/67537921 |
Volume | 208 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELfKEBIvaHyuMMBCPCBVKbETpzFvCIGm8SEhNmlvkR3bUgVNpi19YM_84dzFzkfXTRq8RFVqN23u17uf47vfEfJa2tyUXJgIRU-jNLMyUkyWEYYipbhkUmKh8Ndv2cFxengiTiaTP6OspXWj5-XFlXUl_2NVOAd2xSrZf7Bs_6FwAl6DfeEIFobjjWyMTLEVWm4L_gd1kVVtlg65ZZswDrR4BhHJ1KvlBZwzbc4GZsKNN6-Rg4L9VnVUny1DPVLVis92WYbbDHajO0BQc-pdLXYzau2nUGFj9mM-7PY35z9Vn08_O-zf-VIrc6kuceOhhBjlsgxFArBy9N7Qet-a4m4x8-qRnfPlcT5C2WLkShn3fTpCWGbc94nZcvnAMdDlWz0HZuNrlzdltS-Fuz4JEZc_MLmAqUU79Ra5zWGxgX0wPn_PR_FcpJ3mPP6koE8FU9_2V91kNdcsVVrKcrRL7gVL0fceOPfJxFYPyB3fffT3Q-JG8KEdfGjtaAcf2sGHDvChAT7vxuChTU23wEMDeB6R408fjz4cRKHtRlQmgjWRizOX54JLrVRs8izNtVBZ7iwrwdlnLNNxYmRZAvWPtWXC8AVM0Tx1MpbGxsljslPVld0jVKUSxuZOoaaQzbTEOSYxC-GEtLGckjfdbSvKoEmPrVF-FVvGmZJX_dBTL8Ry1aCX3b0vwE3i3peqbL0-L5hE4sX49SNg5ZwsJGdT8sQbbbgMRDUGwfjpTb7CM3J3-EPsk53mbG2fA29t9IsWVn8BxeWdZQ |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Statistical+analysis+of+modified+complete+randomized+designs%3Aapplications+to+chemo-orientation+studies&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+experimental+biology&rft.au=Pilla%2C+Ramani+S.&rft.au=Kitska%2C+David+J.&rft.au=Loader%2C+Catherine&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.issn=0022-0949&rft.eissn=1477-9145&rft.volume=208&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1267&rft.epage=1276&rft_id=info:doi/10.1242%2Fjeb.01523&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1242_jeb_01523 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-0949&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-0949&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-0949&client=summon |