Modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin or gemcitabine + cisplatin in unresectable gallbladder cancer: Results of a phase III randomised controlled trial

To determine equivalence of modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin in unresectable gallbladder cancer (GBC). Primary end-point was overall survival (OS). Open label, prospective, randomised phase III equivalence study. Inclusion criteria included histologically...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of cancer (1990) Vol. 123; pp. 162 - 170
Main Authors Sharma, Atul, Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu, Pal Chaudhary, Surendra, Sreenivas, V., Kumar Sahoo, Ranjit, Kumar Shukla, Nootan, Thulkar, Sanjay, Pal, Sujoy, Deo, Surya V., Pathy, Sushmita, Ranjan Dash, Nihar, Kumar, Sunil, Bhatnagar, Sushma, Kumar, Rakesh, Mishra, Seema, Sahni, Peush, Iyer, Venkateswaran K., Raina, Vinod
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2019
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To determine equivalence of modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin in unresectable gallbladder cancer (GBC). Primary end-point was overall survival (OS). Open label, prospective, randomised phase III equivalence study. Inclusion criteria included histologically proven unresectable GBC, 18 years or older, adequate organ functions and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≤2. 108 patients were required in each arm to have an equivalence margin of ±2 months with power of 80%. Modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (mGemOx)—gemcitabine 900 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2, maximum 6 cycles; gemcitabine + cisplatin (CisGem)—gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, cisplatin 25 mg/m2, maximum 8 cycles, all day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Two hundred sixty subjects were recruited between February 2011 and July 2015. Two hundred forty-three patients (119, mGemOx and 124, CisGem) received at least 1 dose and analysed for safety and efficacy (modified intention to treat). Median OS was 8·5 months for whole group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7·9–9·1). Median OS in mGemOx was 9 months and 8·3 months in CisGem; p = 0·057 (hazard ratio = 0·78; 95% CI = 0·60-1·02). Restricted mean OS for follow-up limited to 30 months was 11·2 months (95% CI: 9·8–12·6) in mGemOx and 10·4 months (95% CI: 9·1–11·7) in CisGem. Difference of the mean was 0·8 months with 95% CI, exceeding 2 months (−1·1 to 2·7), hence rejecting equivalence. Peripheral neuropathy, thrombocytopaenia in mGemOx and nephrotoxicity was higher with CisGem. This trial failed to show equivalence of eight cycles of CisGem to six cycles of mGemOx. Numerically OS was better with mGemOx. Toxicities were different. The trial was not powered to answer superiority. CTRI/2010/091/001406. •No randomised controlled trials have compared CisGem and mGemOx in unresectable gallbladder cancer.•A phase III randomised equivalence study with 2 months of equivalence margin was conducted.•243 subjects were analysed in modified ITT analysis.•Median overall survival in mGemOx was 9 months and 8·3 months in CisGem.•Results confirmed that 8 cycles of CisGem were not equivalent to 6 cycles of mGemOx.
AbstractList To determine equivalence of modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin in unresectable gallbladder cancer (GBC). Primary end-point was overall survival (OS). Open label, prospective, randomised phase III equivalence study. Inclusion criteria included histologically proven unresectable GBC, 18 years or older, adequate organ functions and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≤2. 108 patients were required in each arm to have an equivalence margin of ±2 months with power of 80%. Modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (mGemOx)-gemcitabine 900 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2, maximum 6 cycles; gemcitabine + cisplatin (CisGem)-gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, cisplatin 25 mg/m2, maximum 8 cycles, all day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Two hundred sixty subjects were recruited between February 2011 and July 2015. Two hundred forty-three patients (119, mGemOx and 124, CisGem) received at least 1 dose and analysed for safety and efficacy (modified intention to treat). Median OS was 8·5 months for whole group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7·9-9·1). Median OS in mGemOx was 9 months and 8·3 months in CisGem; p = 0·057 (hazard ratio = 0·78; 95% CI = 0·60-1·02). Restricted mean OS for follow-up limited to 30 months was 11·2 months (95% CI: 9·8-12·6) in mGemOx and 10·4 months (95% CI: 9·1-11·7) in CisGem. Difference of the mean was 0·8 months with 95% CI, exceeding 2 months (-1·1 to 2·7), hence rejecting equivalence. Peripheral neuropathy, thrombocytopaenia in mGemOx and nephrotoxicity was higher with CisGem. This trial failed to show equivalence of eight cycles of CisGem to six cycles of mGemOx. Numerically OS was better with mGemOx. Toxicities were different. The trial was not powered to answer superiority. CTRI/2010/091/001406.
To determine equivalence of modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin in unresectable gallbladder cancer (GBC). Primary end-point was overall survival (OS).AIMTo determine equivalence of modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin in unresectable gallbladder cancer (GBC). Primary end-point was overall survival (OS).Open label, prospective, randomised phase III equivalence study. Inclusion criteria included histologically proven unresectable GBC, 18 years or older, adequate organ functions and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≤2.METHODSOpen label, prospective, randomised phase III equivalence study. Inclusion criteria included histologically proven unresectable GBC, 18 years or older, adequate organ functions and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≤2.108 patients were required in each arm to have an equivalence margin of ±2 months with power of 80%.SAMPLE SIZE108 patients were required in each arm to have an equivalence margin of ±2 months with power of 80%.Modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (mGemOx)-gemcitabine 900 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2, maximum 6 cycles; gemcitabine + cisplatin (CisGem)-gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, cisplatin 25 mg/m2, maximum 8 cycles, all day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks.TREATMENTModified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (mGemOx)-gemcitabine 900 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2, maximum 6 cycles; gemcitabine + cisplatin (CisGem)-gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, cisplatin 25 mg/m2, maximum 8 cycles, all day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks.Two hundred sixty subjects were recruited between February 2011 and July 2015. Two hundred forty-three patients (119, mGemOx and 124, CisGem) received at least 1 dose and analysed for safety and efficacy (modified intention to treat). Median OS was 8·5 months for whole group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7·9-9·1). Median OS in mGemOx was 9 months and 8·3 months in CisGem; p = 0·057 (hazard ratio = 0·78; 95% CI = 0·60-1·02). Restricted mean OS for follow-up limited to 30 months was 11·2 months (95% CI: 9·8-12·6) in mGemOx and 10·4 months (95% CI: 9·1-11·7) in CisGem. Difference of the mean was 0·8 months with 95% CI, exceeding 2 months (-1·1 to 2·7), hence rejecting equivalence. Peripheral neuropathy, thrombocytopaenia in mGemOx and nephrotoxicity was higher with CisGem.RESULTSTwo hundred sixty subjects were recruited between February 2011 and July 2015. Two hundred forty-three patients (119, mGemOx and 124, CisGem) received at least 1 dose and analysed for safety and efficacy (modified intention to treat). Median OS was 8·5 months for whole group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7·9-9·1). Median OS in mGemOx was 9 months and 8·3 months in CisGem; p = 0·057 (hazard ratio = 0·78; 95% CI = 0·60-1·02). Restricted mean OS for follow-up limited to 30 months was 11·2 months (95% CI: 9·8-12·6) in mGemOx and 10·4 months (95% CI: 9·1-11·7) in CisGem. Difference of the mean was 0·8 months with 95% CI, exceeding 2 months (-1·1 to 2·7), hence rejecting equivalence. Peripheral neuropathy, thrombocytopaenia in mGemOx and nephrotoxicity was higher with CisGem.This trial failed to show equivalence of eight cycles of CisGem to six cycles of mGemOx. Numerically OS was better with mGemOx. Toxicities were different. The trial was not powered to answer superiority.CONCLUSIONThis trial failed to show equivalence of eight cycles of CisGem to six cycles of mGemOx. Numerically OS was better with mGemOx. Toxicities were different. The trial was not powered to answer superiority.CTRI/2010/091/001406.CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATIONCTRI/2010/091/001406.
To determine equivalence of modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin in unresectable gallbladder cancer (GBC). Primary end-point was overall survival (OS). Open label, prospective, randomised phase III equivalence study. Inclusion criteria included histologically proven unresectable GBC, 18 years or older, adequate organ functions and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≤2. 108 patients were required in each arm to have an equivalence margin of ±2 months with power of 80%. Modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (mGemOx)—gemcitabine 900 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2, maximum 6 cycles; gemcitabine + cisplatin (CisGem)—gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, cisplatin 25 mg/m2, maximum 8 cycles, all day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Two hundred sixty subjects were recruited between February 2011 and July 2015. Two hundred forty-three patients (119, mGemOx and 124, CisGem) received at least 1 dose and analysed for safety and efficacy (modified intention to treat). Median OS was 8·5 months for whole group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7·9–9·1). Median OS in mGemOx was 9 months and 8·3 months in CisGem; p = 0·057 (hazard ratio = 0·78; 95% CI = 0·60-1·02). Restricted mean OS for follow-up limited to 30 months was 11·2 months (95% CI: 9·8–12·6) in mGemOx and 10·4 months (95% CI: 9·1–11·7) in CisGem. Difference of the mean was 0·8 months with 95% CI, exceeding 2 months (−1·1 to 2·7), hence rejecting equivalence. Peripheral neuropathy, thrombocytopaenia in mGemOx and nephrotoxicity was higher with CisGem. This trial failed to show equivalence of eight cycles of CisGem to six cycles of mGemOx. Numerically OS was better with mGemOx. Toxicities were different. The trial was not powered to answer superiority. CTRI/2010/091/001406. •No randomised controlled trials have compared CisGem and mGemOx in unresectable gallbladder cancer.•A phase III randomised equivalence study with 2 months of equivalence margin was conducted.•243 subjects were analysed in modified ITT analysis.•Median overall survival in mGemOx was 9 months and 8·3 months in CisGem.•Results confirmed that 8 cycles of CisGem were not equivalent to 6 cycles of mGemOx.
Aim To determine equivalence of modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin in unresectable gallbladder cancer (GBC). Primary end-point was overall survival (OS). Methods Open label, prospective, randomised phase III equivalence study. Inclusion criteria included histologically proven unresectable GBC, 18 years or older, adequate organ functions and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≤2. Sample size 108 patients were required in each arm to have an equivalence margin of ±2 months with power of 80%. Treatment Modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (mGemOx)-gemcitabine 900 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2, maximum 6 cycles; gemcitabine + cisplatin (CisGem)-gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, cisplatin 25 mg/m2, maximum 8 cycles, all day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Results Two hundred sixty subjects were recruited between February 2011 and July 2015. Two hundred forty-three patients (119, mGemOx and 124, CisGem) received at least 1 dose and analysed for safety and efficacy (modified intention to treat). Median OS was 8·5 months for whole group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7·9–9·1). Median OS in mGemOx was 9 months and 8·3 months in CisGem; p = 0·057 (hazard ratio = 0·78; 95% CI = 0·60-1·02). Restricted mean OS for follow-up limited to 30 months was 11·2 months (95% CI: 9·8–12·6) in mGemOx and 10·4 months (95% CI: 9·1–11·7) in CisGem. Difference of the mean was 0·8 months with 95% CI, exceeding 2 months (−1·1 to 2·7), hence rejecting equivalence. Peripheral neuropathy, thrombocytopaenia in mGemOx and nephrotoxicity was higher with CisGem. Conclusion This trial failed to show equivalence of eight cycles of CisGem to six cycles of mGemOx. Numerically OS was better with mGemOx. Toxicities were different. The trial was not powered to answer superiority. Clinical trial registration CTRI/2010/091/001406.
Author Mishra, Seema
Sreenivas, V.
Pathy, Sushmita
Kumar, Sunil
Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu
Bhatnagar, Sushma
Kumar Shukla, Nootan
Raina, Vinod
Ranjan Dash, Nihar
Kumar Sahoo, Ranjit
Deo, Surya V.
Sahni, Peush
Kumar, Rakesh
Pal, Sujoy
Iyer, Venkateswaran K.
Pal Chaudhary, Surendra
Sharma, Atul
Thulkar, Sanjay
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Atul
  surname: Sharma
  fullname: Sharma, Atul
  email: Atul1@hotmail.com
  organization: Department of Medical Oncology, Dr BRA IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, India
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Bidhu
  surname: Kalyan Mohanti
  fullname: Kalyan Mohanti, Bidhu
  email: drbkmohanti@gmail.com
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr BRA IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, India
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Surendra
  surname: Pal Chaudhary
  fullname: Pal Chaudhary, Surendra
  email: Drsurendra101@gmail.com
  organization: Department of Medical Oncology, Dr BRA IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, India
– sequence: 4
  givenname: V.
  surname: Sreenivas
  fullname: Sreenivas, V.
  email: sreevishnubhatla@gmail.com
  organization: Department of Biostatistics, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, India
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ranjit
  surname: Kumar Sahoo
  fullname: Kumar Sahoo, Ranjit
  email: drranjitmd@gmail.com
  organization: Department of Medical Oncology, Dr BRA IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, India
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Nootan
  surname: Kumar Shukla
  fullname: Kumar Shukla, Nootan
  email: Nkshukla2@yahoo.com
  organization: Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr BRA IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, India
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Sanjay
  surname: Thulkar
  fullname: Thulkar, Sanjay
  email: sanjaythulkar@gmail.com
  organization: Department of Radio Diagnosis, Dr BRA IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, India
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Sujoy
  surname: Pal
  fullname: Pal, Sujoy
  email: sujoypal@hotmail.com
  organization: Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, India
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Surya V.
  surname: Deo
  fullname: Deo, Surya V.
  email: svsdeo@yahoo.co.in
  organization: Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr BRA IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, India
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Sushmita
  surname: Pathy
  fullname: Pathy, Sushmita
  email: drspathy@gmail.com
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr BRA IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, India
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Nihar
  surname: Ranjan Dash
  fullname: Ranjan Dash, Nihar
  email: nagranjan@gmail.com
  organization: Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, India
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Sunil
  surname: Kumar
  fullname: Kumar, Sunil
  email: Dr_sunilk@hotmail.com
  organization: Department of Surgical Oncology, Dr BRA IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, India
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Sushma
  surname: Bhatnagar
  fullname: Bhatnagar, Sushma
  email: sushmabhatnagar1@gmail.com
  organization: Department of Onco-anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, Dr BRA IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi, 110029, India
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Rakesh
  surname: Kumar
  fullname: Kumar, Rakesh
  email: rkphulia@yahoo.com
  organization: Professor Department of Nuclear Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi, 110029, India
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Seema
  surname: Mishra
  fullname: Mishra, Seema
  email: seemamishra2003@gmail.com
  organization: Professor Department of Nuclear Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi, 110029, India
– sequence: 16
  givenname: Peush
  surname: Sahni
  fullname: Sahni, Peush
  email: peush_sahni@hotmail.com
  organization: Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, India
– sequence: 17
  givenname: Venkateswaran K.
  surname: Iyer
  fullname: Iyer, Venkateswaran K.
  email: iyervenkat4@gmail.com
  organization: Department of Pathology, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, India
– sequence: 18
  givenname: Vinod
  surname: Raina
  fullname: Raina, Vinod
  email: vinodraina@hotmail.com
  organization: Department of Medical Oncology, Dr BRA IRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029, India
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31707181$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkduKFDEQhoOsuLOjL-CFBLwRpMekD-n0sjeyeBhYEUSvm0pSvabNJGPSLe6L-LymmVFwLlYIVKj6_qqi_gty5oNHQp5ytuGMi1fjBkcNm5LxLic2jNUPyIrLtiuYbMozsmJd0xWS1d05uUhpZIy1smaPyHnFW9ZyyVfk14dg7GDR0FvcaTuBsh4peEPDT3B272Cynob4T_kl1TYdS_nNPmJCnYsO6S04pxwYg5Fq8BrjJf2EaXZTomGgQPdfISHdbrc05jFhZ1MeroOfYnAuf6dowT0mDwdwCZ8c45p8efvm8_X74ubju-3165tCVw2bCgWDQFAgWlOiLJUSlaiNbrDmIgNCaSVYqSTCIDkOuh3qsm3ASKnbVqiuWpMXh777GL7PmKY-76PROfAY5tSXFa9E07SlyOjzE3QMc_R5u0xVrBNS5Lgmz47UrHZo-n20O4h3_Z-LZ6A8ADqGlCIOfxHO-sXWfuwXW_vF1iWXbc0ieSJavJjscjWw7n7p1UGK-Yw_LMY-aYvZF2Nj9qw3wd4vvzyRa2e91eC-4d3_xL8BZIbS4Q
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tranon_2021_101331
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhepr_2024_101290
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13193_025_02202_1
crossref_primary_10_2217_imt_2022_0191
crossref_primary_10_4103_ijmpo_ijmpo_110_20
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41572_022_00398_y
crossref_primary_10_3390_curroncol32030175
crossref_primary_10_1016_S2468_1253_21_00171_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinre_2020_05_009
crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_23_01193
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12664_021_01182_8
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13225671
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_023_37030_w
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2021_717397
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11864_023_01153_5
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_44767_3
crossref_primary_10_3390_curroncol30080517
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v30_i9_1018
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamaoncol_2020_6166
crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0044_1787750
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13402_022_00692_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_annonc_2022_10_506
crossref_primary_10_1177_11795549211035540
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00761_023_01373_2
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_1720696
crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_23_01566
crossref_primary_10_3390_cells13090730
crossref_primary_10_4251_wjgo_v14_i10_2061
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11523_022_00942_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_critrevonc_2021_103328
crossref_primary_10_4103_ijmr_IJMR_2709_19
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10143108
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0007_4551_22_00464_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_esmoop_2024_103647
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_025_03703_7
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13143507
crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2023_1183619
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41392_020_00324_2
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14225580
crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2024_1497415
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00262_024_03796_1
crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_23_02420
crossref_primary_10_1111_liv_15948
crossref_primary_10_1200_GO_20_00657
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14071748
crossref_primary_10_1097_COC_0000000000000989
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1293670
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmt_2022_101707
crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_21_00679
crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v10_i12_3856
Cites_doi 10.1002/sim.2864
10.1002/jhbp.439
10.1056/NEJMoa0908721
10.1002/sim.4274
10.1002/cam4.299
10.1093/annonc/mdh351
10.21037/jgo.2017.03.08
10.1200/JCO.2010.29.3605
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2019 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2019
Copyright_xml – notice: 2019 Elsevier Ltd
– notice: Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
– notice: Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2019
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7TO
7U7
C1K
H94
K9.
NAPCQ
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
Toxicology Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
Toxicology Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic


AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1879-0852
EndPage 170
ExternalDocumentID 31707181
10_1016_j_ejca_2019_10_004
S0959804919307543
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
29G
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6PF
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABGSF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABOCM
ABUDA
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACIEU
ACIUM
ACPRK
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADUVX
AEBSH
AEHWI
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRAH
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGRDE
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HED
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
K-O
KOM
M29
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OC~
OO-
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSH
SSU
SSZ
T5K
UV1
WUQ
X7M
XPP
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
~G-
AACTN
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AFCTW
AFKWA
AHPSJ
AJBFU
AJOXV
AMFUW
DOVZS
EFLBG
LCYCR
RIG
ZA5
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
NPM
7TO
7U7
C1K
H94
K9.
NAPCQ
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-baf6eaba67d2e82bb6364dc5e4163506bcb602b8eaf81efc7f4275ad88c776b93
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0959-8049
1879-0852
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 03:47:29 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 02:21:15 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:31:08 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:56:55 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:00:53 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:48:47 EST 2024
Tue Aug 26 19:28:13 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords Oxaliplatin
Gemcitabine
Equivalence
Gallbladder cancer
Cisplatin
Language English
License Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c350t-baf6eaba67d2e82bb6364dc5e4163506bcb602b8eaf81efc7f4275ad88c776b93
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 31707181
PQID 2330968623
PQPubID 2047469
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2313655726
proquest_journals_2330968623
pubmed_primary_31707181
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejca_2019_10_004
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ejca_2019_10_004
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ejca_2019_10_004
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ejca_2019_10_004
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate December 2019
2019-12-00
20191201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2019
  text: December 2019
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle European journal of cancer (1990)
PublicationTitleAlternate Eur J Cancer
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Elsevier Science Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
– name: Elsevier Science Ltd
References Sharma, Dwary, Vaithiswaran (bib5) 2010; 31
Klein, Logan, Harshoff, Anderson (bib9) 2007; 26
Fiteni, Nguyen, Vernerey (bib11) 2014; 3
Ramaswamy, Ostwal, Pinninti (bib12) 2017; 24
André, Tournigand, Rosmorduc (bib6) 2004; 15
accessed on 01.02.2019 [supplementary)].
Sharma, Dwary, Mohanti (bib3) 2010; 28
Royston, Parmar (bib8) 2011; 30
Valle, Wasan, Palmer (bib2) 2010; 362
accessed on 01.01.2019.
Ostwal, Pinninti, Ramaswamy (bib10) 2017; 8
Chung Chow, Shao, Wang (bib7) 2008
Sharma (10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib3) 2010; 28
Chung Chow (10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib7) 2008
Ostwal (10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib10) 2017; 8
Royston (10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib8) 2011; 30
Sharma (10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib5) 2010; 31
Valle (10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib2) 2010; 362
10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib1
Fiteni (10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib11) 2014; 3
André (10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib6) 2004; 15
Klein (10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib9) 2007; 26
10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib4
Ramaswamy (10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib12) 2017; 24
References_xml – volume: 26
  start-page: 4505
  year: 2007
  end-page: 4519
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time
  publication-title: Stat Med
– reference: accessed on 01.02.2019 [supplementary)].
– volume: 8
  start-page: 368
  year: 2017
  end-page: 376
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Treatment of advanced Gallbladder cancer in the real world-can continuation chemotherapy improve outcomes?
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Oncol
– volume: 3
  start-page: 1502
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1511
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Cisplatin/gemcitabine or oxaliplatin/gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer: a systematic review
  publication-title: Cancer Med
– volume: 362
  start-page: 1273
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1281
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 30
  start-page: 2409
  year: 2011
  end-page: 2421
  ident: bib8
  article-title: The use of restricted mean survival time to estimate the treatment effect in randomized clinical trials when the proportional hazards assumption is in doubt
  publication-title: Stat Med
– volume: 31
  start-page: 127
  year: 2010
  end-page: 128
  ident: bib5
  publication-title: Trop Gastroenterol
– reference: accessed on 01.01.2019.
– volume: 28
  start-page: 4581
  year: 2010
  end-page: 4586
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Best supportive care compared with chemotherapy for unresectable gall bladder cancer: a randomized controlled study
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1339
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1343
  ident: bib6
  article-title: GERCOR Group: gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma: a GERCOR study
  publication-title: Ann Oncol
– start-page: 169
  year: 2008
  end-page: 173
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Sample size calculations in clinical research
– volume: 24
  start-page: 262
  year: 2017
  end-page: 267
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Gemcitabine-cisplatin versus gemcitabine-oxaliplatin doublet chemotherapy in advanced gallbladder cancers: a match pair analysis
  publication-title: J Hepto-Biliary-Pancreat Sci
– volume: 31
  start-page: 127
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib5
  publication-title: Trop Gastroenterol
– volume: 26
  start-page: 4505
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib9
  article-title: Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time
  publication-title: Stat Med
  doi: 10.1002/sim.2864
– volume: 24
  start-page: 262
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib12
  article-title: Gemcitabine-cisplatin versus gemcitabine-oxaliplatin doublet chemotherapy in advanced gallbladder cancers: a match pair analysis
  publication-title: J Hepto-Biliary-Pancreat Sci
  doi: 10.1002/jhbp.439
– ident: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib4
– volume: 362
  start-page: 1273
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib2
  article-title: Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721
– volume: 30
  start-page: 2409
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib8
  article-title: The use of restricted mean survival time to estimate the treatment effect in randomized clinical trials when the proportional hazards assumption is in doubt
  publication-title: Stat Med
  doi: 10.1002/sim.4274
– ident: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib1
– start-page: 169
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib7
– volume: 3
  start-page: 1502
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib11
  article-title: Cisplatin/gemcitabine or oxaliplatin/gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer: a systematic review
  publication-title: Cancer Med
  doi: 10.1002/cam4.299
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1339
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib6
  article-title: GERCOR Group: gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma: a GERCOR study
  publication-title: Ann Oncol
  doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh351
– volume: 8
  start-page: 368
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib10
  article-title: Treatment of advanced Gallbladder cancer in the real world-can continuation chemotherapy improve outcomes?
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Oncol
  doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.03.08
– volume: 28
  start-page: 4581
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004_bib3
  article-title: Best supportive care compared with chemotherapy for unresectable gall bladder cancer: a randomized controlled study
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.3605
SSID ssj0007840
Score 2.5192583
Snippet To determine equivalence of modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin in unresectable gallbladder cancer (GBC). Primary...
Aim To determine equivalence of modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin in unresectable gallbladder cancer (GBC). Primary...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 162
SubjectTerms Cancer
Chemotherapy
Cisplatin
Confidence intervals
Equivalence
Gallbladder
Gallbladder cancer
Gemcitabine
Oncology
Oxaliplatin
Patients
Peripheral neuropathy
Randomization
Thrombocytopenia
Toxicity
Title Modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin or gemcitabine + cisplatin in unresectable gallbladder cancer: Results of a phase III randomised controlled trial
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0959804919307543
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.004
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31707181
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2330968623
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2313655726
Volume 123
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBYhhdJLadOm3TYNCvQWnLUt69VbCA27CcmhTSA3o5fbDVt72fVCT_0Z_b2dseUtOSSBgA-2JWFZM575ZH0zIuRzFrjW3vhEa5smmJA80czyJHCXiSCdVX22z0sxuS7ObvjNFjkZYmGQVhltf2_TO2sd74zjaI4Xs9n4O_7BUgBwAYKA3ysw42dRSNTyoz__aR5SdUGR_e8uqB0DZ3qOV7h1mHso00cdw6u4zzndBz47J3T6iryM6JEe9x18TbZCvUOeX8T18Tfk70XjZxWgSvoj_HIw7Yd5b6Cm9rT5DYB7gcS3mjbLO8WH1M1WsQiOdZcAyLUYU0VxXd7O0TotqUMFWX6h38JqPW9XtKmooYuf4AbpdDql4PR8A1oDD4_89zmcdruCvCXXp1-vTiZJ3HkhcYynbWJNJYKxRkifB5VbK5govOMB4RtPhXVWpLlVwVQqC5WTVZFLbrxSTkphNdsl23VTh_eEaqaUYDaV1oNR1lZDLekZZ8JWzDE_Itkw5KWLaclxd4x5OfDPbksUU4liwnsgphE53LRZ9Ek5HqzNBkmWQ7gpGMgSfMaDrfim1R2FfLTd3qAsZTQHqzJnDKaKMHlkI3KwKQaR4OqMqUOzxjrIOOQyFyPyrleyzcsByAMoqLIPT-zUR_ICr3oazh7Zbpfr8AnAVGv3u69lnzw7np5PLv8B4tYe-w
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZKkYAL4s2WAkbiVqWbxPGLG6qodqHbA7RSb1b8CGy1JKvdrNQTP4Pfy0ziLOqhRULKIYptxfFMZj7b34wJeZ8FrrUvfaK1TRNMSJ5oZnkSuMtEkM6qPtvnqZicF58v-MUOORpiYZBWGW1_b9M7ax2fjONojpfz-fgbrmApALgAQcDvFewOuVvA74vHGBz--svzkKqLiuzXu6B6jJzpSV7h0mHyoUwfdhSv4ibvdBP67LzQ8SPyMMJH-rHv4WOyE-on5N4sbpA_Jb9njZ9XACvp9_DTwbwfJr6BlrWnzRUg7iUy32rarK4VH1A3X8ciuDZdBiDXYlAVxY15u0DztKIONWT1gX4N682iXdOmoiVd_gA_SKfTKQWv5xtQG3h5JMAv4LY7FuQZOT_-dHY0SeLRC4ljPG0TW1YilLYU0udB5dYKJgrveED8xlNhnRVpblUoK5WFysmqyCUvvVJOSmE1e05266YOLwnVTCnBbCqtB6usrYZa0jPOhK2YY35EsmHIjYt5yfF4jIUZCGiXBsVkUEz4DMQ0IgfbNss-K8ettdkgSTPEm4KFNOA0bm3Ft62uaeQ_2-0PymKiPVibnDGYK8LskY3Iu20xiAS3Z8o6NBusg5RDLnMxIi96Jdt-HKA8wIIq2_vPTr0l9ydnsxNzMj398oo8wJKek7NPdtvVJrwGZNXaN92f8wc65yCJ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modified+gemcitabine+and+oxaliplatin+or+gemcitabine+%2B+cisplatin+in+unresectable+gallbladder+cancer%3A+Results+of+a+phase+III+randomised+controlled+trial&rft.jtitle=European+journal+of+cancer+%281990%29&rft.au=Sharma%2C+Atul&rft.au=Mohanti%2C+Bidhu+Kalyan&rft.au=Chaudhary%2C+Surendra+Pal&rft.au=Sreenivas%2C+V&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Science+Ltd&rft.issn=0959-8049&rft.eissn=1879-0852&rft.volume=123&rft.spage=162&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ejca.2019.10.004&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0959-8049&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0959-8049&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0959-8049&client=summon