Effects of pressure build-up and CO2 migration on brine production
The need to reduce the maximum injection pressure has been considered an important subject for storage efficiency and safety. Brine extraction from the storage formation is one of the most reliable methods to manage formation pressure. When brine extraction is performed, it is very important to sele...
Saved in:
Published in | Geosciences journal (Seoul, Korea) Vol. 24; no. 4; pp. 425 - 440 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Seoul
The Geological Society of Korea
01.08.2020
Springer Nature B.V 한국지질과학협의회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1226-4806 1598-7477 |
DOI | 10.1007/s12303-020-0012-0 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The need to reduce the maximum injection pressure has been considered an important subject for storage efficiency and safety. Brine extraction from the storage formation is one of the most reliable methods to manage formation pressure. When brine extraction is performed, it is very important to select the optimum location of the extraction well, where the storage efficiency can be maximized. In this study, the sensitivities of the distance between injection/extraction wells and the length or depth of extraction intervals was investigated with a 20,183 metric ton/year injection/extraction rate for 30 years. The injected CO
2
moves upward by buoyancy and spreads horizontally along with the top of the storage formation. Therefore, CO
2
was re-extracted through extraction wells in the case with fully perforated intervals. Even if the intervals were shorter than 20 m, CO
2
was re-extracted with an extraction distance within 500 m from the injection well. Excluding scenarios with CO
2
re-extraction, the injection pressures at injection wells were reduced by 71.7% and the volumes of CO
2
plume increased by 18.8%, compared with the maximum pressure and the gaseous volume of CO
2
in case 1. It was found that the shorter extraction interval of the well located in the bottom part of the reservoir can significantly improve the injection performance, thus reducing the chance of CO
2
re-extraction. With the viewpoint of long-term injectivity, in general, it was confirmed that as the distance of brine extraction increases, the injectivity decreases. However, we could find a considerable exception in general trends. If the extraction well is located within the lateral extension range of the CO
2
migration, brine extraction can limit the lateral migration of CO
2
and consequently increase the overpressure induced by the injection. Therefore, when determining the optimal location of the extraction well, the expected migration range of CO
2
as well as the distance to the injection well, the depth and length of the extraction interval should be considered. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The need to reduce the maximum injection pressure has been considered an important subject for storage efficiency and safety. Brine extraction from the storage formation is one of the most reliable methods to manage formation pressure. When brine extraction is performed, it is very important to select the optimum location of the extraction well, where the storage efficiency can be maximized. In this study, the sensitivities of the distance between injection/extraction wells and the length or depth of extraction intervals was investigated with a 20,183 metric ton/year injection/extraction rate for 30 years. The injected CO
2
moves upward by buoyancy and spreads horizontally along with the top of the storage formation. Therefore, CO
2
was re-extracted through extraction wells in the case with fully perforated intervals. Even if the intervals were shorter than 20 m, CO
2
was re-extracted with an extraction distance within 500 m from the injection well. Excluding scenarios with CO
2
re-extraction, the injection pressures at injection wells were reduced by 71.7% and the volumes of CO
2
plume increased by 18.8%, compared with the maximum pressure and the gaseous volume of CO
2
in case 1. It was found that the shorter extraction interval of the well located in the bottom part of the reservoir can significantly improve the injection performance, thus reducing the chance of CO
2
re-extraction. With the viewpoint of long-term injectivity, in general, it was confirmed that as the distance of brine extraction increases, the injectivity decreases. However, we could find a considerable exception in general trends. If the extraction well is located within the lateral extension range of the CO
2
migration, brine extraction can limit the lateral migration of CO
2
and consequently increase the overpressure induced by the injection. Therefore, when determining the optimal location of the extraction well, the expected migration range of CO
2
as well as the distance to the injection well, the depth and length of the extraction interval should be considered. The need to reduce the maximum injection pressure has been considered an important subject for storage efficiency and safety. Brine extraction from the storage formation is one of the most reliable methods to manage formation pressure. When brine extraction is performed, it is very important to select the optimum location of the extraction well, where the storage efficiency can be maximized. In this study, the sensitivities of the distance between injection/extraction wells and the length or depth of extraction intervals was investigated with a 20,183 metric ton/year injection/extraction rate for 30 years. The injected CO2 moves upward by buoyancy and spreads horizontally along with the top of the storage formation. Therefore, CO2 was re-extracted through extraction wells in the case with fully perforated intervals. Even if the intervals were shorter than 20 m, CO2 was re-extracted with an extraction distance within 500 m from the injection well. Excluding scenarios with CO2 re-extraction, the injection pressures at injection wells were reduced by 71.7% and the volumes of CO2 plume increased by 18.8%, compared with the maximum pressure and the gaseous volume of CO2 in case 1. It was found that the shorter extraction interval of the well located in the bottom part of the reservoir can significantly improve the injection performance, thus reducing the chance of CO2 re-extraction. With the viewpoint of long-term injectivity, in general, it was confirmed that as the distance of brine extraction increases, the injectivity decreases. However, we could find a considerable exception in general trends. If the extraction well is located within the lateral extension range of the CO2 migration, brine extraction can limit the lateral migration of CO2 and consequently increase the overpressure induced by the injection. Therefore, when determining the optimal location of the extraction well, the expected migration range of CO2 as well as the distance to the injection well, the depth and length of the extraction interval should be considered. KCI Citation Count: 0 The need to reduce the maximum injection pressure has been considered an important subject for storage efficiency and safety. Brine extraction from the storage formation is one of the most reliable methods to manage formation pressure. When brine extraction is performed, it is very important to select the optimum location of the extraction well, where the storage efficiency can be maximized. In this study, the sensitivities of the distance between injection/extraction wells and the length or depth of extraction intervals was investigated with a 20,183 metric ton/year injection/extraction rate for 30 years. The injected CO2 moves upward by buoyancy and spreads horizontally along with the top of the storage formation. Therefore, CO2 was re-extracted through extraction wells in the case with fully perforated intervals. Even if the intervals were shorter than 20 m, CO2 was re-extracted with an extraction distance within 500 m from the injection well. Excluding scenarios with CO2 re-extraction, the injection pressures at injection wells were reduced by 71.7% and the volumes of CO2 plume increased by 18.8%, compared with the maximum pressure and the gaseous volume of CO2 in case 1. It was found that the shorter extraction interval of the well located in the bottom part of the reservoir can significantly improve the injection performance, thus reducing the chance of CO2 re-extraction. With the viewpoint of long-term injectivity, in general, it was confirmed that as the distance of brine extraction increases, the injectivity decreases. However, we could find a considerable exception in general trends. If the extraction well is located within the lateral extension range of the CO2 migration, brine extraction can limit the lateral migration of CO2 and consequently increase the overpressure induced by the injection. Therefore, when determining the optimal location of the extraction well, the expected migration range of CO2 as well as the distance to the injection well, the depth and length of the extraction interval should be considered. |
Author | Kim, Taehee Han, Ahreum |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ahreum surname: Han fullname: Han, Ahreum organization: Petroleum and Marine Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Office of Gochang County – sequence: 2 givenname: Taehee surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Taehee email: katzura@kigam.re.kr organization: Petroleum and Marine Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources |
BackLink | https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002612389$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNp9kE1LAzEQhoNUsK3-AG8LnjxEJ1-b7LEWPwpCQeo5ZNOkpNbdmuwe_PemXUEQFAIThuedeeedoFHTNg6hSwI3BEDeJkIZMAwUMAChGE7QmIhKYcmlHOU_pSXmCsozNElpCyAkAzlGd_feO9ulovXFPrqU-uiKug-7Ne73hWnWxXxJi_ewiaYLbVPkV8fQuAy3694eeufo1JtdchffdYpeH-5X8yf8vHxczGfP2DIBHRZSSlvnpU6auuKl4QBcKU-MUJJI5pmQQqyBOWYFZU5xCzXnTlWKeVdyNkXXw9wmev1mg25NONZNq9-inr2sFroSvMwrMns1sNnmR-9Sp7dtH5tsT1NOKlVWQkKm5EDZ2KYUndc2dMc7u2jCThPQh3D1EK7O4epDuPqgJL-U-xjeTfz8V0MHTcpss3Hxx9Pfoi-rQ4p0 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijggc_2023_103915 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoen_2024_213290 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.01.014 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.03.010 10.1007/s10584-009-9558-6 10.1016/j.gca.2005.01.015 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.02.004 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.01.001 10.1007/s00254-006-0479-7 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.04.018 10.1039/C5EE03648H 10.2516/ogst/2010013 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00096-5 10.2172/751729 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00273-4 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.07.025 10.1002/2013WR014893 10.1016/j.pecs.2007.10.001 10.18770/KEPCO.2016.02.02.167 10.14770/jgsk.2015.51.5.487 10.14770/jgsk.2019.55.4.445 10.2172/944124 10.1007/s12665-015-4086-3 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.007 10.1016/j.enconman.2007.01.016 10.1021/es4017014 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.11.007 10.1007/s10584-009-9560-z 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.378 10.2118/99938-PA 10.18434/T4D303 10.1016/B978-008044704-9/50065-3 10.1007/s12303-012-0026-3 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Association of Korean Geoscience Societies and Springer 2020 The Association of Korean Geoscience Societies and Springer 2020. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Association of Korean Geoscience Societies and Springer 2020 – notice: The Association of Korean Geoscience Societies and Springer 2020. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7TN 7UA 8FD C1K F1W FR3 H8D H96 KR7 L.G L7M ACYCR |
DOI | 10.1007/s12303-020-0012-0 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Oceanic Abstracts Water Resources Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Engineering Research Database Aerospace Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources Civil Engineering Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Aerospace Database Civil Engineering Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources Oceanic Abstracts Technology Research Database ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Engineering Research Database Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Water Resources Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management |
DatabaseTitleList | Aerospace Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Geology |
EISSN | 1598-7477 |
EndPage | 440 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9546307 10_1007_s12303_020_0012_0 |
GroupedDBID | -5A -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .VR 06D 0R~ 0VY 1N0 203 29H 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2VQ 2~H 30V 3IR 3V. 4.4 406 408 40D 40E 5GY 5VS 67M 6NX 88I 8FE 8FG 8FH 8TC 95- 95. 95~ 96X 9ZL AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHQN ABJCF ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABQBU ABSXP ABTEG ABTHY ABTKH ABTMW ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACGFS ACGOD ACHSB ACHXU ACIWK ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACSNA ACZOJ ADHHG ADHIR ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEUYN AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFFNX AFGCZ AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFRAH AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHKAY AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARAPS ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AYJHY AZFZN AZQEC B-. BA0 BDATZ BENPR BGLVJ BGNMA BHPHI BKSAR BPHCQ C1A CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DNIVK DPUIP DU5 DWQXO EBD EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD ESBYG FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNUQQ GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 H13 HCIFZ HF~ HG6 HMJXF HRMNR HZ~ IAO IEA IEP IJ- IKXTQ IWAJR IXC IXD I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JZLTJ KOV L6V L8X LK5 LLZTM M2P M4Y M7R M7S MA- NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O9J P2P P62 PCBAR PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PT4 PTHSS Q2X QOS R89 R9I ROL RSV S16 S1Z S27 S3B SAP SDH SEV SHX SISQX SJN SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW STPWE SZN T13 TSG TUC TUS U2A UG4 UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W48 WK8 YLTOR Z45 Z5O Z7Z ZMTXR ~02 ~A9 AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ACSTC AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AFOHR AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR CITATION PHGZM PHGZT 7TN 7UA 8FD ABRTQ C1K F1W FR3 H8D H96 KR7 L.G L7M 08R AAFGU AAPBV AAYFA ABFGW ABKAS ACBMV ACBRV ACBYP ACIGE ACIPQ ACTTH ACVWB ACWMK ACYCR ADMDM ADOXG AEFTE AESTI AEVTX AFNRJ AGGBP AIMYW AJDOV AKQUC UNUBA |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-5777cb307e7ab946a400488f1a587173f35755d03e3c523e84c0b44e8983fe643 |
IEDL.DBID | U2A |
ISSN | 1226-4806 |
IngestDate | Tue Nov 21 21:28:42 EST 2023 Fri Jul 25 19:27:33 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:56:53 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:51:31 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:34:42 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | storage efficiency maximum injection pressure extraction well extraction interval |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c350t-5777cb307e7ab946a400488f1a587173f35755d03e3c523e84c0b44e8983fe643 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-020-0012-0 |
PQID | 2419869570 |
PQPubID | 54400 |
PageCount | 16 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9546307 proquest_journals_2419869570 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s12303_020_0012_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12303_020_0012_0 springer_journals_10_1007_s12303_020_0012_0 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-08-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2020 text: 2020-08-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Seoul |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Seoul – name: Dordrecht |
PublicationTitle | Geosciences journal (Seoul, Korea) |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Geosci J |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | The Geological Society of Korea Springer Nature B.V 한국지질과학협의회 |
Publisher_xml | – name: The Geological Society of Korea – name: Springer Nature B.V – name: 한국지질과학협의회 |
References | Kim (CR16) 2019; 55 Pruess, Zhang (CR27) 2008 Lemmon, McLinden, Friend, Linstrom, Mallard (CR20) 2020 Minh, Losel (CR25) 2009; 93 Pruess, Spycher (CR26) 2007; 48 Pruess, Oldenburg, Moridis (CR28) 1999 Gwon (CR13) 2016; 2 Buscheck, Sun, Chen, Hao, Wolery, Bourcier, Court, Celia, Friedmann, Aines (CR6) 2012; 6 Choi, Park, Shinn, Kim, Chae, Kim (CR9) 2015; 51 Goodman, Hakala, Bromhal, Deel, Rodosta, Frailey, Small, Allen, Romanov, Fazio, Huerta, McIntyre, Kutchko, Guthrie (CR12) 2011; 5 Mijic, LaForce, Muggeridge (CR24) 2014; 50 Liu, Hou, Were, Sun, Gou (CR22) 2015; 73 Suekane, Nobuso, Hirai, Kiyota (CR32) 2008; 2 Zeebe, Wolf-Gladrow (CR34) 2001 Buscheck, White, Carroll, Bielicki, Aines (CR8) 2016; 9 Bryant, Lakshminarasimhan, Pope (CR4) 2008; 13 Heath, Mckenna, Dewers, Kobos (CR14) 2014; 48 Zhou, Birkholzer, Tsang, Rutqvist (CR35) 2008; 2 Buscheck, Bielicki, White, Sun, Hao, Bourcier, Carroll, Aines (CR7) 2016; 54 Lee, Lee, Kim, Lee, Park (CR19) 2014; 23 Spycher, Pruess (CR29) 2005; 69 Kihm, Kim (CR15) 2013; 49 (CR11) 2017 Bachu (CR2) 2015; 40 Lewicki, Birkholzer, Tsang (CR21) 2007; 52 Lombard, Azaroual, Pironon, Broseta, Egermann, Munier, Mouronval (CR23) 2010; 65 Cihan, Birkholzer, Bianchi (CR10) 2015; 42 van der Zwaan, Gerlagh (CR33) 2009; 93 Lee, Lee, Kim, Lee, Park, Kim, Yoo (CR18) 2012; 16 Bachu (CR1) 2008; 34 (CR17) 2015 Streit, Siggins (CR31) 2005 Spycher, Pruess, Ennis-King (CR30) 2003; 67 Birkholzer, Cihan, Zhou (CR3) 2012; 7 Buscheck, Sun, Hao, Wolery, Bourcier, Tompson, Jones, Friedmann, Aines (CR5) 2011; 4 BY Choi (12_CR9) 2015; 51 K Pruess (12_CR27) 2008 B van der Zwaan (12_CR33) 2009; 93 JH Kihm (12_CR15) 2013; 49 EW Lemmon (12_CR20) 2020 K Pruess (12_CR26) 2007; 48 Q Zhou (12_CR35) 2008; 2 S Bachu (12_CR1) 2008; 34 TA Buscheck (12_CR5) 2011; 4 JE Heath (12_CR14) 2014; 48 S Bachu (12_CR2) 2015; 40 N Spycher (12_CR29) 2005; 69 N Spycher (12_CR30) 2003; 67 GH Lee (12_CR18) 2012; 16 T Suekane (12_CR32) 2008; 2 TA Buscheck (12_CR7) 2016; 54 JM Lombard (12_CR23) 2010; 65 JT Birkholzer (12_CR3) 2012; 7 TA Buscheck (12_CR6) 2012; 6 JL Lewicki (12_CR21) 2007; 52 JE Streit (12_CR31) 2005 A Cihan (12_CR10) 2015; 42 A Mijic (12_CR24) 2014; 50 TA Buscheck (12_CR8) 2016; 9 K Pruess (12_CR28) 1999 T Kim (12_CR16) 2019; 55 GCCSI (12_CR11) 2017 GH Lee (12_CR19) 2014; 23 SL Bryant (12_CR4) 2008; 13 H Liu (12_CR22) 2015; 73 L Gwon (12_CR13) 2016; 2 RE Zeebe (12_CR34) 2001 A Goodman (12_CR12) 2011; 5 KNU (12_CR17) 2015 HD Minh (12_CR25) 2009; 93 |
References_xml | – volume: 23 start-page: 22 year: 2014 end-page: 29 ident: CR19 article-title: The geological CO storage capacity of the Jeju basin, offshore southern Korea, estimated using the storage efficiency publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.01.014 – year: 2017 ident: CR11 publication-title: The Global Status of CCS: 2017 – volume: 5 start-page: 952 year: 2011 end-page: 965 ident: CR12 article-title: U.S. DOE methodology for the development of geologic storage potential for carbon dioxide at the national and regional scale publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.03.010 – volume: 49 start-page: 389 year: 2013 end-page: 406 ident: CR15 article-title: Prediction and analysis of behavior of carbon dioxide injected into target geologic formations in the Bukpyeong basin, Korea publication-title: Journal of Geological Society of Korea – volume: 93 start-page: 285 year: 2009 end-page: 309 ident: CR33 article-title: Economics of geological CO storage and leakage publication-title: Climatic Change doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9558-6 – volume: 13 start-page: 447 year: 2008 end-page: 454 ident: CR4 article-title: Buoyancydominated multiphase flow and its effect on geological sequestration of CO publication-title: Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal – volume: 69 start-page: 3309 year: 2005 end-page: 3320 ident: CR29 article-title: CO -H O mixtures in the geological sequestration of CO . II. Partitioning in chloride brines at 12–100 °C and up to 600 bar publication-title: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2005.01.015 – volume: 2 start-page: 626 year: 2008 end-page: 639 ident: CR35 article-title: Method for quick assessment of CO storage capacity in closed and semi-closed saline formations publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.02.004 – volume: 7 start-page: 168 year: 2012 end-page: 180 ident: CR3 article-title: Impact-driven pressure management via targeted brine extraction? Conceptual studies of CO storage in saline formations publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.01.001 – volume: 52 start-page: 457 year: 2007 end-page: 467 ident: CR21 article-title: Natural and industrial analogues for leakage of CO from storage reservoirs: identification of features, events, and processes and lessons learned publication-title: Environment Geology doi: 10.1007/s00254-006-0479-7 – volume: 54 start-page: 499 year: 2016 end-page: 512 ident: CR7 article-title: Pre-injection brine production in CO storage reservoirs: an approach to augment the development, operation, and performance of CCS while generating water publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.04.018 – volume: 9 start-page: 1504 year: 2016 end-page: 1512 ident: CR8 article-title: Managing geologic CO storage with pre-injection brine production: a strategy evaluated with a model of CO injection at Snøhvit publication-title: Energy & Environment Sciences doi: 10.1039/C5EE03648H – volume: 65 start-page: 533 year: 2010 end-page: 539 ident: CR23 article-title: CO injectivity in geological storages: an overview of program and results of the GeoCarbone- Injectivity Project publication-title: Oil & Gas Science and Technology–Revue d’IFP Energies Nouvelles doi: 10.2516/ogst/2010013 – volume: 2 start-page: 58 year: 2008 end-page: 64 ident: CR32 article-title: Geological storage of carbon dioxide by residual gas and solubility trapping publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00096-5 – year: 1999 ident: CR28 publication-title: TOUGH user’s guide, version 2.0 doi: 10.2172/751729 – volume: 67 start-page: 3015 year: 2003 end-page: 3031 ident: CR30 article-title: CO -H O mixtures in the geological sequestration of CO . I. Assessment and calculation of mutual solubilities from 12 to 100 °C and up to 600 bar publication-title: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00273-4 – volume: 42 start-page: 175 year: 2015 end-page: 187 ident: CR10 article-title: Optimal well placement and brine extraction for pressure management during CO sequestration publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.07.025 – volume: 50 start-page: 4163 year: 2014 end-page: 4185 ident: CR24 article-title: CO injectivity in saline aquifers: the impact of non-Darcy flow, phase miscibility, and gas compressibility publication-title: Water Resources Research doi: 10.1002/2013WR014893 – volume: 34 start-page: 254 year: 2008 end-page: 273 ident: CR1 article-title: CO storage in geological media: role, means, status and barriers to deployment publication-title: Progress in Energy and Combustion Science doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2007.10.001 – volume: 2 start-page: 167 year: 2016 end-page: 185 ident: CR13 article-title: Review of CO storage projects and driving strategy of CO storage program in Korea publication-title: KEPCO Journal on Electric Power and Energy doi: 10.18770/KEPCO.2016.02.02.167 – volume: 51 start-page: 487 year: 2015 end-page: 496 ident: CR9 article-title: Preliminary results of numerical simulation in as small-scale CO injection pilot site: 1. Prediction of CO plume migration publication-title: Journal of Geological Society of Korea doi: 10.14770/jgsk.2015.51.5.487 – volume: 55 start-page: 445 year: 2019 end-page: 460 ident: CR16 article-title: Numerical study on the mechanism of pore pressure changes due to the CO injection in the finite reservoir publication-title: Journal of Geological Society of Korea doi: 10.14770/jgsk.2019.55.4.445 – year: 2020 ident: CR20 article-title: Thermophysical properties of fluid systems publication-title: NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. NIST Chemistry WebBook – year: 2008 ident: CR27 publication-title: Numerical modeling studies of the dissolution- diffusion-convection process during CO storage in saline aquifers doi: 10.2172/944124 – year: 2015 ident: CR17 publication-title: Small-scale CO injection-demonstration project in offshore Pohang basin – volume: 73 start-page: 6839 year: 2015 end-page: 6854 ident: CR22 article-title: Numerical studies on CO injection-brine extraction process in a low-medium temperature reservoir system publication-title: Environmental Earth Sciences doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4086-3 – volume: 40 start-page: 188 year: 2015 end-page: 202 ident: CR2 article-title: Review of CO storage efficiency in deep saline aquifers publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.007 – volume: 48 start-page: 1761 year: 2007 end-page: 1767 ident: CR26 article-title: ECO N–A fluid property module for the TOUGH2 code for studies of CO storage in saline aquifers publication-title: Energy Conversion and Management doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2007.01.016 – volume: 48 start-page: 1067 year: 2014 end-page: 1074 ident: CR14 article-title: Multi well CO injectivity: impact of boundary conditions and brine extraction on geologic CO storage efficiency and pressure buildup publication-title: Environmental Sciences & Technology doi: 10.1021/es4017014 – start-page: 643 year: 2005 end-page: 651 ident: CR31 publication-title: Predicting, monitoring and controlling geomechanical effects of CO injection – volume: 6 start-page: 230 year: 2012 end-page: 245 ident: CR6 article-title: Active CO reservoir management for carbon storage: analysis of operational strategies to relieve pressure buildup and improve injectivity publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.11.007 – volume: 93 start-page: 311 year: 2009 end-page: 317 ident: CR25 article-title: Zero is the only acceptable leakage rate for geologically stored CO : an editorial comment publication-title: Climatic Change doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9560-z – year: 2001 ident: CR34 publication-title: CO in Seawater: Equilibrium, Kinetics, Isotopes – volume: 4 start-page: 4283 year: 2011 end-page: 4290 ident: CR5 article-title: Combining brine extraction, desalination, and residual brine reinjection with CO storage in saline formations: implications for pressure management, capacity, and risk mitigation publication-title: Energy Procedia doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.378 – volume: 16 start-page: 33 year: 2012 end-page: 326 ident: CR18 article-title: Estimation of the CO storage capacity of the structural traps in the southern Jeju basin, offshore southern Korea, northern East China Sea publication-title: Geosciences Journal – volume: 9 start-page: 1504 year: 2016 ident: 12_CR8 publication-title: Energy & Environment Sciences doi: 10.1039/C5EE03648H – volume: 13 start-page: 447 year: 2008 ident: 12_CR4 publication-title: Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal doi: 10.2118/99938-PA – volume: 54 start-page: 499 year: 2016 ident: 12_CR7 publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.04.018 – volume: 51 start-page: 487 year: 2015 ident: 12_CR9 publication-title: Journal of Geological Society of Korea doi: 10.14770/jgsk.2015.51.5.487 – volume-title: TOUGH2 user’s guide, version 2.0 year: 1999 ident: 12_CR28 doi: 10.2172/751729 – volume: 5 start-page: 952 year: 2011 ident: 12_CR12 publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.03.010 – volume: 2 start-page: 167 year: 2016 ident: 12_CR13 publication-title: KEPCO Journal on Electric Power and Energy doi: 10.18770/KEPCO.2016.02.02.167 – volume: 49 start-page: 389 year: 2013 ident: 12_CR15 publication-title: Journal of Geological Society of Korea – volume-title: NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. NIST Chemistry WebBook year: 2020 ident: 12_CR20 doi: 10.18434/T4D303 – volume: 2 start-page: 626 year: 2008 ident: 12_CR35 publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.02.004 – volume: 4 start-page: 4283 year: 2011 ident: 12_CR5 publication-title: Energy Procedia doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.378 – volume: 55 start-page: 445 year: 2019 ident: 12_CR16 publication-title: Journal of Geological Society of Korea doi: 10.14770/jgsk.2019.55.4.445 – volume: 34 start-page: 254 year: 2008 ident: 12_CR1 publication-title: Progress in Energy and Combustion Science doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2007.10.001 – volume: 69 start-page: 3309 year: 2005 ident: 12_CR29 publication-title: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2005.01.015 – volume: 42 start-page: 175 year: 2015 ident: 12_CR10 publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.07.025 – start-page: 643 volume-title: Predicting, monitoring and controlling geomechanical effects of CO2 injection year: 2005 ident: 12_CR31 doi: 10.1016/B978-008044704-9/50065-3 – volume: 2 start-page: 58 year: 2008 ident: 12_CR32 publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00096-5 – volume: 73 start-page: 6839 year: 2015 ident: 12_CR22 publication-title: Environmental Earth Sciences doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4086-3 – volume-title: Numerical modeling studies of the dissolution- diffusion-convection process during CO2 storage in saline aquifers year: 2008 ident: 12_CR27 doi: 10.2172/944124 – volume-title: The Global Status of CCS: 2017 year: 2017 ident: 12_CR11 – volume: 23 start-page: 22 year: 2014 ident: 12_CR19 publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.01.014 – volume-title: CO2 in Seawater: Equilibrium, Kinetics, Isotopes year: 2001 ident: 12_CR34 – volume: 7 start-page: 168 year: 2012 ident: 12_CR3 publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.01.001 – volume: 93 start-page: 311 year: 2009 ident: 12_CR25 publication-title: Climatic Change doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9560-z – volume: 65 start-page: 533 year: 2010 ident: 12_CR23 publication-title: Oil & Gas Science and Technology–Revue d’IFP Energies Nouvelles doi: 10.2516/ogst/2010013 – volume: 48 start-page: 1067 year: 2014 ident: 12_CR14 publication-title: Environmental Sciences & Technology doi: 10.1021/es4017014 – volume: 93 start-page: 285 year: 2009 ident: 12_CR33 publication-title: Climatic Change doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9558-6 – volume: 50 start-page: 4163 year: 2014 ident: 12_CR24 publication-title: Water Resources Research doi: 10.1002/2013WR014893 – volume: 40 start-page: 188 year: 2015 ident: 12_CR2 publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.007 – volume: 6 start-page: 230 year: 2012 ident: 12_CR6 publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.11.007 – volume: 52 start-page: 457 year: 2007 ident: 12_CR21 publication-title: Environment Geology doi: 10.1007/s00254-006-0479-7 – volume: 48 start-page: 1761 year: 2007 ident: 12_CR26 publication-title: Energy Conversion and Management doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2007.01.016 – volume-title: Small-scale CO2 injection-demonstration project in offshore Pohang basin year: 2015 ident: 12_CR17 – volume: 16 start-page: 33 year: 2012 ident: 12_CR18 publication-title: Geosciences Journal doi: 10.1007/s12303-012-0026-3 – volume: 67 start-page: 3015 year: 2003 ident: 12_CR30 publication-title: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00273-4 |
SSID | ssj0057307 |
Score | 2.1930876 |
Snippet | The need to reduce the maximum injection pressure has been considered an important subject for storage efficiency and safety. Brine extraction from the storage... |
SourceID | nrf proquest crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 425 |
SubjectTerms | Brines Carbon dioxide Distance Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Injection Injection wells Intervals Length Optimization Overpressure Pressure Pressure effects Saline water 지질학 |
Title | Effects of pressure build-up and CO2 migration on brine production |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12303-020-0012-0 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2419869570 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002612389 |
Volume | 24 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Geosciences Journal, 2020, 24(4), , pp.425-440 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3dS8MwEA9uQ_BF_MTpHEF8Ugpd27Tp4xz7UEFfHMynkKS5Mabd2MeD_72XfjgmKgiFQJum9O6S_MLd_Y6Qa9CQSM7B0WEITqDwuKOAgQNoTgaMwSZj-3wKB8PgYcRGRR73sox2L12S2Uq9SXZDtGx9jjYT2sYTVEiN2aM7GvHQa5fLL0OTzSqqIK5wAu6GpSvzpyG2NqNKuoAtnPnNNZrtOL0Dsl9ARdrOdXtIdkx6RHb7WSnej2NylxMPL-kMaBbNul4YqmyVa2c9pzJNaOfZo--Tca5jipeyqX50npO84r0TMux1XzoDp6iI4GifuSuHRVGkFf6giaSKg1DmMxBaknHrTgcf0RdLXN_4Gk-YhgfaVUFgeMx9MAg-Tkk1naXmjFDL-yZxuUN4AgG4krdCCZ5KOK53AFLXiVuKRuiCLtxWrXgTG6JjK02B0rSBcZ5w6-Tm65V5zpXxV-crlLeY6omwDNe2Hc_EdCEQx9-L2LL0u1GdNEp1iGJuLQVijpiHMYtwjNtSRZvHv37x_F-9L8ielxmKjfVrkOpqsTaXiD9Wqklq7f7rY7eZ2d0n_t_PZQ |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3dS8MwEA86EX0RP3E6NYhPSqHrZ_o4h3PTOV822FtI0twY025024P_vZd-OCYqCIVAm6b07pL8wt39jpAbUBALxsBSQQCWJ_G4I8EHC9CcNGiNTcb22QvaA-9p6A-LPO55Ge1euiSzlXqV7IZo2fgcTSa0iSfYJFuIBZiJ4xo4jXL59dFks4oqiCssj9lB6cr8aYi1zWgzSWENZ35zjWY7Tmuf7BVQkTZy3R6QDZ0cku3HrBTvxxG5z4mH53QKNItmXaaaSlPl2lrOqEhi2nx16Pt4lOuY4iVNqh-d5SSveO-YDFoP_WbbKioiWMr17YXlh2GoJP6gDoWMvEDkMxDqwmfGnQ4uoi8_tl3tKjxhauYpW3qeZhFzQSP4OCGVZJroU0IN75vA5Q7hCXhgC1YPBDgyZrjeAQhVJXYpGq4KunBTteKNr4iOjTQ5StMExjncrpLbr1dmOVfGX52vUd58osbcMFybdjTlk5Qjju_wyLD022GV1Ep18GJuzTlijogFkR_iGHelilaPf_3i2b96X5Gddv-ly7ud3vM52XUyozFxfzVSWaRLfYFYZCEvM9v7BGdj0MQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LSwMxEA62ongRn1itGsSTsnS7z-yxVmurUj1Y6C0k2Uwp1W3p4-C_d7IPS0UFYSGwm82yM5PkCzPzDSGXoCAWjIGlggAsT-JxR4IPFqA5adAam5Ttsxu0e95D3-_ndU5nRbR74ZLMchoMS1Myr01iqC0T3xA5G_-jyYo2sQUlso6rcd2Ydc9pFEuxj-abVldBjGF5zA4Kt-ZPQ6xsTKVkCiuY85ubNN19WjtkO4eNtJHpeZes6WSPbNynZXk_9slNRkI8o2OgaWTrYqqpNBWvrcWEiiSmzWeHvg8Hmb4pXtKk_dFJRviK9w5Ir3X32mxbeXUES7m-Pbf8MAyVxB_UoZCRF4hsNkJd-My41sFFJObHtqtdhadNzTxlS8_TLGIuaAQih6ScjBN9RKjhgBO49CFUAQ9sweqBAEfGDNc-AKEqxC5Ew1VOHW4qWLzxJemxkSZHaZogOYfbFXL19cok4834q_MFypuP1JAbtmvTDsZ8NOWI6Ts8Moz9dlgh1UIdPJ9nM474I2JB5Ic4xnWhouXjX794_K_e52Tz5bbFnzrdxxOy5aQ2Y0IAq6Q8ny70KcKSuTxLTe8T5DjVAA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects+of+pressure+build-up+and+CO2+migration+on+brine+production&rft.jtitle=Geosciences+journal+%28Seoul%2C+Korea%29&rft.au=Han%2C+Ahreum&rft.au=Kim%2C+Taehee&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.issn=1226-4806&rft.eissn=1598-7477&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=425&rft.epage=440&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs12303-020-0012-0&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s12303_020_0012_0 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1226-4806&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1226-4806&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1226-4806&client=summon |