Effects of pressure build-up and CO2 migration on brine production

The need to reduce the maximum injection pressure has been considered an important subject for storage efficiency and safety. Brine extraction from the storage formation is one of the most reliable methods to manage formation pressure. When brine extraction is performed, it is very important to sele...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeosciences journal (Seoul, Korea) Vol. 24; no. 4; pp. 425 - 440
Main Authors Han, Ahreum, Kim, Taehee
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Seoul The Geological Society of Korea 01.08.2020
Springer Nature B.V
한국지질과학협의회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1226-4806
1598-7477
DOI10.1007/s12303-020-0012-0

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The need to reduce the maximum injection pressure has been considered an important subject for storage efficiency and safety. Brine extraction from the storage formation is one of the most reliable methods to manage formation pressure. When brine extraction is performed, it is very important to select the optimum location of the extraction well, where the storage efficiency can be maximized. In this study, the sensitivities of the distance between injection/extraction wells and the length or depth of extraction intervals was investigated with a 20,183 metric ton/year injection/extraction rate for 30 years. The injected CO 2 moves upward by buoyancy and spreads horizontally along with the top of the storage formation. Therefore, CO 2 was re-extracted through extraction wells in the case with fully perforated intervals. Even if the intervals were shorter than 20 m, CO 2 was re-extracted with an extraction distance within 500 m from the injection well. Excluding scenarios with CO 2 re-extraction, the injection pressures at injection wells were reduced by 71.7% and the volumes of CO 2 plume increased by 18.8%, compared with the maximum pressure and the gaseous volume of CO 2 in case 1. It was found that the shorter extraction interval of the well located in the bottom part of the reservoir can significantly improve the injection performance, thus reducing the chance of CO 2 re-extraction. With the viewpoint of long-term injectivity, in general, it was confirmed that as the distance of brine extraction increases, the injectivity decreases. However, we could find a considerable exception in general trends. If the extraction well is located within the lateral extension range of the CO 2 migration, brine extraction can limit the lateral migration of CO 2 and consequently increase the overpressure induced by the injection. Therefore, when determining the optimal location of the extraction well, the expected migration range of CO 2 as well as the distance to the injection well, the depth and length of the extraction interval should be considered.
AbstractList The need to reduce the maximum injection pressure has been considered an important subject for storage efficiency and safety. Brine extraction from the storage formation is one of the most reliable methods to manage formation pressure. When brine extraction is performed, it is very important to select the optimum location of the extraction well, where the storage efficiency can be maximized. In this study, the sensitivities of the distance between injection/extraction wells and the length or depth of extraction intervals was investigated with a 20,183 metric ton/year injection/extraction rate for 30 years. The injected CO 2 moves upward by buoyancy and spreads horizontally along with the top of the storage formation. Therefore, CO 2 was re-extracted through extraction wells in the case with fully perforated intervals. Even if the intervals were shorter than 20 m, CO 2 was re-extracted with an extraction distance within 500 m from the injection well. Excluding scenarios with CO 2 re-extraction, the injection pressures at injection wells were reduced by 71.7% and the volumes of CO 2 plume increased by 18.8%, compared with the maximum pressure and the gaseous volume of CO 2 in case 1. It was found that the shorter extraction interval of the well located in the bottom part of the reservoir can significantly improve the injection performance, thus reducing the chance of CO 2 re-extraction. With the viewpoint of long-term injectivity, in general, it was confirmed that as the distance of brine extraction increases, the injectivity decreases. However, we could find a considerable exception in general trends. If the extraction well is located within the lateral extension range of the CO 2 migration, brine extraction can limit the lateral migration of CO 2 and consequently increase the overpressure induced by the injection. Therefore, when determining the optimal location of the extraction well, the expected migration range of CO 2 as well as the distance to the injection well, the depth and length of the extraction interval should be considered.
The need to reduce the maximum injection pressure has been considered an important subject for storage efficiency and safety. Brine extraction from the storage formation is one of the most reliable methods to manage formation pressure. When brine extraction is performed, it is very important to select the optimum location of the extraction well, where the storage efficiency can be maximized. In this study, the sensitivities of the distance between injection/extraction wells and the length or depth of extraction intervals was investigated with a 20,183 metric ton/year injection/extraction rate for 30 years. The injected CO2 moves upward by buoyancy and spreads horizontally along with the top of the storage formation. Therefore, CO2 was re-extracted through extraction wells in the case with fully perforated intervals. Even if the intervals were shorter than 20 m, CO2 was re-extracted with an extraction distance within 500 m from the injection well. Excluding scenarios with CO2 re-extraction, the injection pressures at injection wells were reduced by 71.7% and the volumes of CO2 plume increased by 18.8%, compared with the maximum pressure and the gaseous volume of CO2 in case 1. It was found that the shorter extraction interval of the well located in the bottom part of the reservoir can significantly improve the injection performance, thus reducing the chance of CO2 re-extraction. With the viewpoint of long-term injectivity, in general, it was confirmed that as the distance of brine extraction increases, the injectivity decreases. However, we could find a considerable exception in general trends. If the extraction well is located within the lateral extension range of the CO2 migration, brine extraction can limit the lateral migration of CO2 and consequently increase the overpressure induced by the injection. Therefore, when determining the optimal location of the extraction well, the expected migration range of CO2 as well as the distance to the injection well, the depth and length of the extraction interval should be considered. KCI Citation Count: 0
The need to reduce the maximum injection pressure has been considered an important subject for storage efficiency and safety. Brine extraction from the storage formation is one of the most reliable methods to manage formation pressure. When brine extraction is performed, it is very important to select the optimum location of the extraction well, where the storage efficiency can be maximized. In this study, the sensitivities of the distance between injection/extraction wells and the length or depth of extraction intervals was investigated with a 20,183 metric ton/year injection/extraction rate for 30 years. The injected CO2 moves upward by buoyancy and spreads horizontally along with the top of the storage formation. Therefore, CO2 was re-extracted through extraction wells in the case with fully perforated intervals. Even if the intervals were shorter than 20 m, CO2 was re-extracted with an extraction distance within 500 m from the injection well. Excluding scenarios with CO2 re-extraction, the injection pressures at injection wells were reduced by 71.7% and the volumes of CO2 plume increased by 18.8%, compared with the maximum pressure and the gaseous volume of CO2 in case 1. It was found that the shorter extraction interval of the well located in the bottom part of the reservoir can significantly improve the injection performance, thus reducing the chance of CO2 re-extraction. With the viewpoint of long-term injectivity, in general, it was confirmed that as the distance of brine extraction increases, the injectivity decreases. However, we could find a considerable exception in general trends. If the extraction well is located within the lateral extension range of the CO2 migration, brine extraction can limit the lateral migration of CO2 and consequently increase the overpressure induced by the injection. Therefore, when determining the optimal location of the extraction well, the expected migration range of CO2 as well as the distance to the injection well, the depth and length of the extraction interval should be considered.
Author Kim, Taehee
Han, Ahreum
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ahreum
  surname: Han
  fullname: Han, Ahreum
  organization: Petroleum and Marine Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Office of Gochang County
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Taehee
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Taehee
  email: katzura@kigam.re.kr
  organization: Petroleum and Marine Division, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources
BackLink https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002612389$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNp9kE1LAzEQhoNUsK3-AG8LnjxEJ1-b7LEWPwpCQeo5ZNOkpNbdmuwe_PemXUEQFAIThuedeeedoFHTNg6hSwI3BEDeJkIZMAwUMAChGE7QmIhKYcmlHOU_pSXmCsozNElpCyAkAzlGd_feO9ulovXFPrqU-uiKug-7Ne73hWnWxXxJi_ewiaYLbVPkV8fQuAy3694eeufo1JtdchffdYpeH-5X8yf8vHxczGfP2DIBHRZSSlvnpU6auuKl4QBcKU-MUJJI5pmQQqyBOWYFZU5xCzXnTlWKeVdyNkXXw9wmev1mg25NONZNq9-inr2sFroSvMwrMns1sNnmR-9Sp7dtH5tsT1NOKlVWQkKm5EDZ2KYUndc2dMc7u2jCThPQh3D1EK7O4epDuPqgJL-U-xjeTfz8V0MHTcpss3Hxx9Pfoi-rQ4p0
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijggc_2023_103915
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_geoen_2024_213290
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.01.014
10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.03.010
10.1007/s10584-009-9558-6
10.1016/j.gca.2005.01.015
10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.02.004
10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.01.001
10.1007/s00254-006-0479-7
10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.04.018
10.1039/C5EE03648H
10.2516/ogst/2010013
10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00096-5
10.2172/751729
10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00273-4
10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.07.025
10.1002/2013WR014893
10.1016/j.pecs.2007.10.001
10.18770/KEPCO.2016.02.02.167
10.14770/jgsk.2015.51.5.487
10.14770/jgsk.2019.55.4.445
10.2172/944124
10.1007/s12665-015-4086-3
10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.007
10.1016/j.enconman.2007.01.016
10.1021/es4017014
10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.11.007
10.1007/s10584-009-9560-z
10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.378
10.2118/99938-PA
10.18434/T4D303
10.1016/B978-008044704-9/50065-3
10.1007/s12303-012-0026-3
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Association of Korean Geoscience Societies and Springer 2020
The Association of Korean Geoscience Societies and Springer 2020.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Association of Korean Geoscience Societies and Springer 2020
– notice: The Association of Korean Geoscience Societies and Springer 2020.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7TN
7UA
8FD
C1K
F1W
FR3
H8D
H96
KR7
L.G
L7M
ACYCR
DOI 10.1007/s12303-020-0012-0
DatabaseName CrossRef
Oceanic Abstracts
Water Resources Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Aerospace Database
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources
Civil Engineering Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Aerospace Database
Civil Engineering Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources
Oceanic Abstracts
Technology Research Database
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
Water Resources Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitleList

Aerospace Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Geology
EISSN 1598-7477
EndPage 440
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9546307
10_1007_s12303_020_0012_0
GroupedDBID -5A
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.VR
06D
0R~
0VY
1N0
203
29H
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2VQ
2~H
30V
3IR
3V.
4.4
406
408
40D
40E
5GY
5VS
67M
6NX
88I
8FE
8FG
8FH
8TC
95-
95.
95~
96X
9ZL
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANZL
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHQN
ABJCF
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABQBU
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTHY
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABUWG
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACHSB
ACHXU
ACIWK
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACSNA
ACZOJ
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADINQ
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEUYN
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFFNX
AFGCZ
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFRAH
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHKAY
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARAPS
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AYJHY
AZFZN
AZQEC
B-.
BA0
BDATZ
BENPR
BGLVJ
BGNMA
BHPHI
BKSAR
BPHCQ
C1A
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
DWQXO
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
ESBYG
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNUQQ
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
H13
HCIFZ
HF~
HG6
HMJXF
HRMNR
HZ~
IAO
IEA
IEP
IJ-
IKXTQ
IWAJR
IXC
IXD
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JZLTJ
KOV
L6V
L8X
LK5
LLZTM
M2P
M4Y
M7R
M7S
MA-
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O9J
P2P
P62
PCBAR
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PT4
PTHSS
Q2X
QOS
R89
R9I
ROL
RSV
S16
S1Z
S27
S3B
SAP
SDH
SEV
SHX
SISQX
SJN
SJYHP
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
STPWE
SZN
T13
TSG
TUC
TUS
U2A
UG4
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W48
WK8
YLTOR
Z45
Z5O
Z7Z
ZMTXR
~02
~A9
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ACSTC
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AFOHR
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
7TN
7UA
8FD
ABRTQ
C1K
F1W
FR3
H8D
H96
KR7
L.G
L7M
08R
AAFGU
AAPBV
AAYFA
ABFGW
ABKAS
ACBMV
ACBRV
ACBYP
ACIGE
ACIPQ
ACTTH
ACVWB
ACWMK
ACYCR
ADMDM
ADOXG
AEFTE
AESTI
AEVTX
AFNRJ
AGGBP
AIMYW
AJDOV
AKQUC
UNUBA
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-5777cb307e7ab946a400488f1a587173f35755d03e3c523e84c0b44e8983fe643
IEDL.DBID U2A
ISSN 1226-4806
IngestDate Tue Nov 21 21:28:42 EST 2023
Fri Jul 25 19:27:33 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:56:53 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:51:31 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:34:42 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords storage efficiency
maximum injection pressure
extraction well
extraction interval
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c350t-5777cb307e7ab946a400488f1a587173f35755d03e3c523e84c0b44e8983fe643
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-020-0012-0
PQID 2419869570
PQPubID 54400
PageCount 16
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_9546307
proquest_journals_2419869570
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s12303_020_0012_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12303_020_0012_0
springer_journals_10_1007_s12303_020_0012_0
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Seoul
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Seoul
– name: Dordrecht
PublicationTitle Geosciences journal (Seoul, Korea)
PublicationTitleAbbrev Geosci J
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher The Geological Society of Korea
Springer Nature B.V
한국지질과학협의회
Publisher_xml – name: The Geological Society of Korea
– name: Springer Nature B.V
– name: 한국지질과학협의회
References Kim (CR16) 2019; 55
Pruess, Zhang (CR27) 2008
Lemmon, McLinden, Friend, Linstrom, Mallard (CR20) 2020
Minh, Losel (CR25) 2009; 93
Pruess, Spycher (CR26) 2007; 48
Pruess, Oldenburg, Moridis (CR28) 1999
Gwon (CR13) 2016; 2
Buscheck, Sun, Chen, Hao, Wolery, Bourcier, Court, Celia, Friedmann, Aines (CR6) 2012; 6
Choi, Park, Shinn, Kim, Chae, Kim (CR9) 2015; 51
Goodman, Hakala, Bromhal, Deel, Rodosta, Frailey, Small, Allen, Romanov, Fazio, Huerta, McIntyre, Kutchko, Guthrie (CR12) 2011; 5
Mijic, LaForce, Muggeridge (CR24) 2014; 50
Liu, Hou, Were, Sun, Gou (CR22) 2015; 73
Suekane, Nobuso, Hirai, Kiyota (CR32) 2008; 2
Zeebe, Wolf-Gladrow (CR34) 2001
Buscheck, White, Carroll, Bielicki, Aines (CR8) 2016; 9
Bryant, Lakshminarasimhan, Pope (CR4) 2008; 13
Heath, Mckenna, Dewers, Kobos (CR14) 2014; 48
Zhou, Birkholzer, Tsang, Rutqvist (CR35) 2008; 2
Buscheck, Bielicki, White, Sun, Hao, Bourcier, Carroll, Aines (CR7) 2016; 54
Lee, Lee, Kim, Lee, Park (CR19) 2014; 23
Spycher, Pruess (CR29) 2005; 69
Kihm, Kim (CR15) 2013; 49
(CR11) 2017
Bachu (CR2) 2015; 40
Lewicki, Birkholzer, Tsang (CR21) 2007; 52
Lombard, Azaroual, Pironon, Broseta, Egermann, Munier, Mouronval (CR23) 2010; 65
Cihan, Birkholzer, Bianchi (CR10) 2015; 42
van der Zwaan, Gerlagh (CR33) 2009; 93
Lee, Lee, Kim, Lee, Park, Kim, Yoo (CR18) 2012; 16
Bachu (CR1) 2008; 34
(CR17) 2015
Streit, Siggins (CR31) 2005
Spycher, Pruess, Ennis-King (CR30) 2003; 67
Birkholzer, Cihan, Zhou (CR3) 2012; 7
Buscheck, Sun, Hao, Wolery, Bourcier, Tompson, Jones, Friedmann, Aines (CR5) 2011; 4
BY Choi (12_CR9) 2015; 51
K Pruess (12_CR27) 2008
B van der Zwaan (12_CR33) 2009; 93
JH Kihm (12_CR15) 2013; 49
EW Lemmon (12_CR20) 2020
K Pruess (12_CR26) 2007; 48
Q Zhou (12_CR35) 2008; 2
S Bachu (12_CR1) 2008; 34
TA Buscheck (12_CR5) 2011; 4
JE Heath (12_CR14) 2014; 48
S Bachu (12_CR2) 2015; 40
N Spycher (12_CR29) 2005; 69
N Spycher (12_CR30) 2003; 67
GH Lee (12_CR18) 2012; 16
T Suekane (12_CR32) 2008; 2
TA Buscheck (12_CR7) 2016; 54
JM Lombard (12_CR23) 2010; 65
JT Birkholzer (12_CR3) 2012; 7
TA Buscheck (12_CR6) 2012; 6
JL Lewicki (12_CR21) 2007; 52
JE Streit (12_CR31) 2005
A Cihan (12_CR10) 2015; 42
A Mijic (12_CR24) 2014; 50
TA Buscheck (12_CR8) 2016; 9
K Pruess (12_CR28) 1999
T Kim (12_CR16) 2019; 55
GCCSI (12_CR11) 2017
GH Lee (12_CR19) 2014; 23
SL Bryant (12_CR4) 2008; 13
H Liu (12_CR22) 2015; 73
L Gwon (12_CR13) 2016; 2
RE Zeebe (12_CR34) 2001
A Goodman (12_CR12) 2011; 5
KNU (12_CR17) 2015
HD Minh (12_CR25) 2009; 93
References_xml – volume: 23
  start-page: 22
  year: 2014
  end-page: 29
  ident: CR19
  article-title: The geological CO storage capacity of the Jeju basin, offshore southern Korea, estimated using the storage efficiency
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.01.014
– year: 2017
  ident: CR11
  publication-title: The Global Status of CCS: 2017
– volume: 5
  start-page: 952
  year: 2011
  end-page: 965
  ident: CR12
  article-title: U.S. DOE methodology for the development of geologic storage potential for carbon dioxide at the national and regional scale
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.03.010
– volume: 49
  start-page: 389
  year: 2013
  end-page: 406
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Prediction and analysis of behavior of carbon dioxide injected into target geologic formations in the Bukpyeong basin, Korea
  publication-title: Journal of Geological Society of Korea
– volume: 93
  start-page: 285
  year: 2009
  end-page: 309
  ident: CR33
  article-title: Economics of geological CO storage and leakage
  publication-title: Climatic Change
  doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9558-6
– volume: 13
  start-page: 447
  year: 2008
  end-page: 454
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Buoyancydominated multiphase flow and its effect on geological sequestration of CO
  publication-title: Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal
– volume: 69
  start-page: 3309
  year: 2005
  end-page: 3320
  ident: CR29
  article-title: CO -H O mixtures in the geological sequestration of CO . II. Partitioning in chloride brines at 12–100 °C and up to 600 bar
  publication-title: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
  doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2005.01.015
– volume: 2
  start-page: 626
  year: 2008
  end-page: 639
  ident: CR35
  article-title: Method for quick assessment of CO storage capacity in closed and semi-closed saline formations
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.02.004
– volume: 7
  start-page: 168
  year: 2012
  end-page: 180
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Impact-driven pressure management via targeted brine extraction? Conceptual studies of CO storage in saline formations
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.01.001
– volume: 52
  start-page: 457
  year: 2007
  end-page: 467
  ident: CR21
  article-title: Natural and industrial analogues for leakage of CO from storage reservoirs: identification of features, events, and processes and lessons learned
  publication-title: Environment Geology
  doi: 10.1007/s00254-006-0479-7
– volume: 54
  start-page: 499
  year: 2016
  end-page: 512
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Pre-injection brine production in CO storage reservoirs: an approach to augment the development, operation, and performance of CCS while generating water
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.04.018
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1504
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1512
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Managing geologic CO storage with pre-injection brine production: a strategy evaluated with a model of CO injection at Snøhvit
  publication-title: Energy & Environment Sciences
  doi: 10.1039/C5EE03648H
– volume: 65
  start-page: 533
  year: 2010
  end-page: 539
  ident: CR23
  article-title: CO injectivity in geological storages: an overview of program and results of the GeoCarbone- Injectivity Project
  publication-title: Oil & Gas Science and Technology–Revue d’IFP Energies Nouvelles
  doi: 10.2516/ogst/2010013
– volume: 2
  start-page: 58
  year: 2008
  end-page: 64
  ident: CR32
  article-title: Geological storage of carbon dioxide by residual gas and solubility trapping
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00096-5
– year: 1999
  ident: CR28
  publication-title: TOUGH user’s guide, version 2.0
  doi: 10.2172/751729
– volume: 67
  start-page: 3015
  year: 2003
  end-page: 3031
  ident: CR30
  article-title: CO -H O mixtures in the geological sequestration of CO . I. Assessment and calculation of mutual solubilities from 12 to 100 °C and up to 600 bar
  publication-title: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00273-4
– volume: 42
  start-page: 175
  year: 2015
  end-page: 187
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Optimal well placement and brine extraction for pressure management during CO sequestration
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.07.025
– volume: 50
  start-page: 4163
  year: 2014
  end-page: 4185
  ident: CR24
  article-title: CO injectivity in saline aquifers: the impact of non-Darcy flow, phase miscibility, and gas compressibility
  publication-title: Water Resources Research
  doi: 10.1002/2013WR014893
– volume: 34
  start-page: 254
  year: 2008
  end-page: 273
  ident: CR1
  article-title: CO storage in geological media: role, means, status and barriers to deployment
  publication-title: Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
  doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2007.10.001
– volume: 2
  start-page: 167
  year: 2016
  end-page: 185
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Review of CO storage projects and driving strategy of CO storage program in Korea
  publication-title: KEPCO Journal on Electric Power and Energy
  doi: 10.18770/KEPCO.2016.02.02.167
– volume: 51
  start-page: 487
  year: 2015
  end-page: 496
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Preliminary results of numerical simulation in as small-scale CO injection pilot site: 1. Prediction of CO plume migration
  publication-title: Journal of Geological Society of Korea
  doi: 10.14770/jgsk.2015.51.5.487
– volume: 55
  start-page: 445
  year: 2019
  end-page: 460
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Numerical study on the mechanism of pore pressure changes due to the CO injection in the finite reservoir
  publication-title: Journal of Geological Society of Korea
  doi: 10.14770/jgsk.2019.55.4.445
– year: 2020
  ident: CR20
  article-title: Thermophysical properties of fluid systems
  publication-title: NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. NIST Chemistry WebBook
– year: 2008
  ident: CR27
  publication-title: Numerical modeling studies of the dissolution- diffusion-convection process during CO storage in saline aquifers
  doi: 10.2172/944124
– year: 2015
  ident: CR17
  publication-title: Small-scale CO injection-demonstration project in offshore Pohang basin
– volume: 73
  start-page: 6839
  year: 2015
  end-page: 6854
  ident: CR22
  article-title: Numerical studies on CO injection-brine extraction process in a low-medium temperature reservoir system
  publication-title: Environmental Earth Sciences
  doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4086-3
– volume: 40
  start-page: 188
  year: 2015
  end-page: 202
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Review of CO storage efficiency in deep saline aquifers
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.007
– volume: 48
  start-page: 1761
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1767
  ident: CR26
  article-title: ECO N–A fluid property module for the TOUGH2 code for studies of CO storage in saline aquifers
  publication-title: Energy Conversion and Management
  doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2007.01.016
– volume: 48
  start-page: 1067
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1074
  ident: CR14
  article-title: Multi well CO injectivity: impact of boundary conditions and brine extraction on geologic CO storage efficiency and pressure buildup
  publication-title: Environmental Sciences & Technology
  doi: 10.1021/es4017014
– start-page: 643
  year: 2005
  end-page: 651
  ident: CR31
  publication-title: Predicting, monitoring and controlling geomechanical effects of CO injection
– volume: 6
  start-page: 230
  year: 2012
  end-page: 245
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Active CO reservoir management for carbon storage: analysis of operational strategies to relieve pressure buildup and improve injectivity
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.11.007
– volume: 93
  start-page: 311
  year: 2009
  end-page: 317
  ident: CR25
  article-title: Zero is the only acceptable leakage rate for geologically stored CO : an editorial comment
  publication-title: Climatic Change
  doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9560-z
– year: 2001
  ident: CR34
  publication-title: CO in Seawater: Equilibrium, Kinetics, Isotopes
– volume: 4
  start-page: 4283
  year: 2011
  end-page: 4290
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Combining brine extraction, desalination, and residual brine reinjection with CO storage in saline formations: implications for pressure management, capacity, and risk mitigation
  publication-title: Energy Procedia
  doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.378
– volume: 16
  start-page: 33
  year: 2012
  end-page: 326
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Estimation of the CO storage capacity of the structural traps in the southern Jeju basin, offshore southern Korea, northern East China Sea
  publication-title: Geosciences Journal
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1504
  year: 2016
  ident: 12_CR8
  publication-title: Energy & Environment Sciences
  doi: 10.1039/C5EE03648H
– volume: 13
  start-page: 447
  year: 2008
  ident: 12_CR4
  publication-title: Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal
  doi: 10.2118/99938-PA
– volume: 54
  start-page: 499
  year: 2016
  ident: 12_CR7
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.04.018
– volume: 51
  start-page: 487
  year: 2015
  ident: 12_CR9
  publication-title: Journal of Geological Society of Korea
  doi: 10.14770/jgsk.2015.51.5.487
– volume-title: TOUGH2 user’s guide, version 2.0
  year: 1999
  ident: 12_CR28
  doi: 10.2172/751729
– volume: 5
  start-page: 952
  year: 2011
  ident: 12_CR12
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.03.010
– volume: 2
  start-page: 167
  year: 2016
  ident: 12_CR13
  publication-title: KEPCO Journal on Electric Power and Energy
  doi: 10.18770/KEPCO.2016.02.02.167
– volume: 49
  start-page: 389
  year: 2013
  ident: 12_CR15
  publication-title: Journal of Geological Society of Korea
– volume-title: NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. NIST Chemistry WebBook
  year: 2020
  ident: 12_CR20
  doi: 10.18434/T4D303
– volume: 2
  start-page: 626
  year: 2008
  ident: 12_CR35
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.02.004
– volume: 4
  start-page: 4283
  year: 2011
  ident: 12_CR5
  publication-title: Energy Procedia
  doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.378
– volume: 55
  start-page: 445
  year: 2019
  ident: 12_CR16
  publication-title: Journal of Geological Society of Korea
  doi: 10.14770/jgsk.2019.55.4.445
– volume: 34
  start-page: 254
  year: 2008
  ident: 12_CR1
  publication-title: Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
  doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2007.10.001
– volume: 69
  start-page: 3309
  year: 2005
  ident: 12_CR29
  publication-title: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
  doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2005.01.015
– volume: 42
  start-page: 175
  year: 2015
  ident: 12_CR10
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.07.025
– start-page: 643
  volume-title: Predicting, monitoring and controlling geomechanical effects of CO2 injection
  year: 2005
  ident: 12_CR31
  doi: 10.1016/B978-008044704-9/50065-3
– volume: 2
  start-page: 58
  year: 2008
  ident: 12_CR32
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00096-5
– volume: 73
  start-page: 6839
  year: 2015
  ident: 12_CR22
  publication-title: Environmental Earth Sciences
  doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4086-3
– volume-title: Numerical modeling studies of the dissolution- diffusion-convection process during CO2 storage in saline aquifers
  year: 2008
  ident: 12_CR27
  doi: 10.2172/944124
– volume-title: The Global Status of CCS: 2017
  year: 2017
  ident: 12_CR11
– volume: 23
  start-page: 22
  year: 2014
  ident: 12_CR19
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.01.014
– volume-title: CO2 in Seawater: Equilibrium, Kinetics, Isotopes
  year: 2001
  ident: 12_CR34
– volume: 7
  start-page: 168
  year: 2012
  ident: 12_CR3
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.01.001
– volume: 93
  start-page: 311
  year: 2009
  ident: 12_CR25
  publication-title: Climatic Change
  doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9560-z
– volume: 65
  start-page: 533
  year: 2010
  ident: 12_CR23
  publication-title: Oil & Gas Science and Technology–Revue d’IFP Energies Nouvelles
  doi: 10.2516/ogst/2010013
– volume: 48
  start-page: 1067
  year: 2014
  ident: 12_CR14
  publication-title: Environmental Sciences & Technology
  doi: 10.1021/es4017014
– volume: 93
  start-page: 285
  year: 2009
  ident: 12_CR33
  publication-title: Climatic Change
  doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9558-6
– volume: 50
  start-page: 4163
  year: 2014
  ident: 12_CR24
  publication-title: Water Resources Research
  doi: 10.1002/2013WR014893
– volume: 40
  start-page: 188
  year: 2015
  ident: 12_CR2
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.01.007
– volume: 6
  start-page: 230
  year: 2012
  ident: 12_CR6
  publication-title: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.11.007
– volume: 52
  start-page: 457
  year: 2007
  ident: 12_CR21
  publication-title: Environment Geology
  doi: 10.1007/s00254-006-0479-7
– volume: 48
  start-page: 1761
  year: 2007
  ident: 12_CR26
  publication-title: Energy Conversion and Management
  doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2007.01.016
– volume-title: Small-scale CO2 injection-demonstration project in offshore Pohang basin
  year: 2015
  ident: 12_CR17
– volume: 16
  start-page: 33
  year: 2012
  ident: 12_CR18
  publication-title: Geosciences Journal
  doi: 10.1007/s12303-012-0026-3
– volume: 67
  start-page: 3015
  year: 2003
  ident: 12_CR30
  publication-title: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00273-4
SSID ssj0057307
Score 2.1930876
Snippet The need to reduce the maximum injection pressure has been considered an important subject for storage efficiency and safety. Brine extraction from the storage...
SourceID nrf
proquest
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 425
SubjectTerms Brines
Carbon dioxide
Distance
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Injection
Injection wells
Intervals
Length
Optimization
Overpressure
Pressure
Pressure effects
Saline water
지질학
Title Effects of pressure build-up and CO2 migration on brine production
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12303-020-0012-0
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2419869570
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002612389
Volume 24
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Geosciences Journal, 2020, 24(4), , pp.425-440
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3dS8MwEA9uQ_BF_MTpHEF8Ugpd27Tp4xz7UEFfHMynkKS5Mabd2MeD_72XfjgmKgiFQJum9O6S_MLd_Y6Qa9CQSM7B0WEITqDwuKOAgQNoTgaMwSZj-3wKB8PgYcRGRR73sox2L12S2Uq9SXZDtGx9jjYT2sYTVEiN2aM7GvHQa5fLL0OTzSqqIK5wAu6GpSvzpyG2NqNKuoAtnPnNNZrtOL0Dsl9ARdrOdXtIdkx6RHb7WSnej2NylxMPL-kMaBbNul4YqmyVa2c9pzJNaOfZo--Tca5jipeyqX50npO84r0TMux1XzoDp6iI4GifuSuHRVGkFf6giaSKg1DmMxBaknHrTgcf0RdLXN_4Gk-YhgfaVUFgeMx9MAg-Tkk1naXmjFDL-yZxuUN4AgG4krdCCZ5KOK53AFLXiVuKRuiCLtxWrXgTG6JjK02B0rSBcZ5w6-Tm65V5zpXxV-crlLeY6omwDNe2Hc_EdCEQx9-L2LL0u1GdNEp1iGJuLQVijpiHMYtwjNtSRZvHv37x_F-9L8ielxmKjfVrkOpqsTaXiD9Wqklq7f7rY7eZ2d0n_t_PZQ
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3dS8MwEA86EX0RP3E6NYhPSqHrZ_o4h3PTOV822FtI0twY025024P_vZd-OCYqCIVAm6b07pL8wt39jpAbUBALxsBSQQCWJ_G4I8EHC9CcNGiNTcb22QvaA-9p6A-LPO55Ge1euiSzlXqV7IZo2fgcTSa0iSfYJFuIBZiJ4xo4jXL59dFks4oqiCssj9lB6cr8aYi1zWgzSWENZ35zjWY7Tmuf7BVQkTZy3R6QDZ0cku3HrBTvxxG5z4mH53QKNItmXaaaSlPl2lrOqEhi2nx16Pt4lOuY4iVNqh-d5SSveO-YDFoP_WbbKioiWMr17YXlh2GoJP6gDoWMvEDkMxDqwmfGnQ4uoi8_tl3tKjxhauYpW3qeZhFzQSP4OCGVZJroU0IN75vA5Q7hCXhgC1YPBDgyZrjeAQhVJXYpGq4KunBTteKNr4iOjTQ5StMExjncrpLbr1dmOVfGX52vUd58osbcMFybdjTlk5Qjju_wyLD022GV1Ep18GJuzTlijogFkR_iGHelilaPf_3i2b96X5Gddv-ly7ud3vM52XUyozFxfzVSWaRLfYFYZCEvM9v7BGdj0MQ
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1LSwMxEA62ongRn1itGsSTsnS7z-yxVmurUj1Y6C0k2Uwp1W3p4-C_d7IPS0UFYSGwm82yM5PkCzPzDSGXoCAWjIGlggAsT-JxR4IPFqA5adAam5Ttsxu0e95D3-_ndU5nRbR74ZLMchoMS1Myr01iqC0T3xA5G_-jyYo2sQUlso6rcd2Ydc9pFEuxj-abVldBjGF5zA4Kt-ZPQ6xsTKVkCiuY85ubNN19WjtkO4eNtJHpeZes6WSPbNynZXk_9slNRkI8o2OgaWTrYqqpNBWvrcWEiiSmzWeHvg8Hmb4pXtKk_dFJRviK9w5Ir3X32mxbeXUES7m-Pbf8MAyVxB_UoZCRF4hsNkJd-My41sFFJObHtqtdhadNzTxlS8_TLGIuaAQih6ScjBN9RKjhgBO49CFUAQ9sweqBAEfGDNc-AKEqxC5Ew1VOHW4qWLzxJemxkSZHaZogOYfbFXL19cok4834q_MFypuP1JAbtmvTDsZ8NOWI6Ts8Moz9dlgh1UIdPJ9nM474I2JB5Ic4xnWhouXjX794_K_e52Tz5bbFnzrdxxOy5aQ2Y0IAq6Q8ny70KcKSuTxLTe8T5DjVAA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects+of+pressure+build-up+and+CO2+migration+on+brine+production&rft.jtitle=Geosciences+journal+%28Seoul%2C+Korea%29&rft.au=Han%2C+Ahreum&rft.au=Kim%2C+Taehee&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.issn=1226-4806&rft.eissn=1598-7477&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=425&rft.epage=440&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs12303-020-0012-0&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s12303_020_0012_0
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1226-4806&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1226-4806&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1226-4806&client=summon