Developing a framework for carbon accounting disclosure strategies: a strategic reference points (SRP) matrix-based analysis
Purpose>During the current century, environmental sustainability and waste reduction processes have always been subject to scrutiny in developed societies. Developed communities have gained considerable momentum by investing in environmental infrastructure and integrating corporate performance di...
Saved in:
Published in | Humanomics Vol. 37; no. 2; pp. 157 - 180 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Bingley
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
03.04.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Purpose>During the current century, environmental sustainability and waste reduction processes have always been subject to scrutiny in developed societies. Developed communities have gained considerable momentum by investing in environmental infrastructure and integrating corporate performance disclosure and less developed communities are involved with it. Carbon disclosure is one of the aspects of green accounting in “corporate strategies,” especially those operating across the capital market. Adherence to the disclosure of facts can facilitate sustainable development in societies. This study aims to present strategic reference points matrix-based model to develop a framework for carbon disclosure strategies through institutional and stakeholder pressures throughout the capital market.Design/methodology/approach>As a case study, by reviewing similar research on carbon disclosure, this study seeks to illustrate various carbon disclosure aspects and strategies in a matrix based on institutional (vertical axis) and stakeholder (horizontal axis) pressuresFindings>The study attempts to states that carbon disclosure is affected solely by the company because of the presence of agency gaps between external stakeholders and corporate executives.Originality/value>However, the firm’s decision to adopt a carbon disclosure strategy depends on the performance of stakeholder pressure (stakeholder salience level) and managers’ perceptions of institutional pressure (institutional pressure centrality level). |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 2514-9369 2514-9377 |
DOI: | 10.1108/IJOES-09-2020-0148 |