Sparsity Analysis of a Sonomyographic Muscle-Computer Interface

Objective: Sonomyography has been shown to be a promising method for decoding volitional motor intent from analysis of ultrasound images of the forearm musculature. The objectives of this paper are to determine the optimal location for ultrasound transducer placement on the anterior forearm for imag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on biomedical engineering Vol. 67; no. 3; pp. 688 - 696
Main Authors Akhlaghi, Nima, Dhawan, Ananya, Khan, Amir A., Mukherjee, Biswarup, Diao, Guoqing, Truong, Cecile, Sikdar, Siddhartha
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States IEEE 01.03.2020
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Objective: Sonomyography has been shown to be a promising method for decoding volitional motor intent from analysis of ultrasound images of the forearm musculature. The objectives of this paper are to determine the optimal location for ultrasound transducer placement on the anterior forearm for imaging maximum muscle deformations during different hand motions, and to investigate the effect of using a sparse set of ultrasound scanlines for motion classification for ultrasound-based muscle-computer interfaces (MCIs). Methods: The optimal placement of the ultrasound transducer along the forearm was identified using freehand three-dimensional reconstructions of the muscle thickness during rest and motion completion. Based on the ultrasound images acquired from the optimally placed transducer, classification accuracy with equally spaced scanlines across the cross-sectional field of view was determined. Furthermore, the unique contribution of each scanline to class discrimination using Fisher criterion (FC) and mutual information (MI) with respect to motion discriminability was determined. Results: Experiments with five able-bodied subjects show that the maximum muscle deformation occurred between 40%-50% of the forearm length for multiple degrees-of-freedom. The average classification accuracy was 94% ± 6% with the entire 128-scanline image and 94% ± 5% with four equally spaced scanlines. However, no significant improvement in classification accuracy was observed with optimal scanline selection using FC and MI. Conclusion: For an optimally placed transducer, a small subset of ultrasound scanlines can be used instead of a full imaging array without sacrificing performance in terms of classification accuracy for multiple degrees-of-freedom. Significance: The selection of a small subset of transducer elements can enable the reduction of computation, and simplification of the instrumentation and power consumption of wearable sonomyographic MCIs, particularly for rehabilitation and gesture recognition applications.
AbstractList Sonomyography has been shown to be a promising method for decoding volitional motor intent from analysis of ultrasound images of the forearm musculature. The objectives of this paper are to determine the optimal location for ultrasound transducer placement on the anterior forearm for imaging maximum muscle deformations during different hand motions, and to investigate the effect of using a sparse set of ultrasound scanlines for motion classification for ultrasound-based muscle-computer interfaces (MCIs). The optimal placement of the ultrasound transducer along the forearm was identified using freehand three-dimensional reconstructions of the muscle thickness during rest and motion completion. Based on the ultrasound images acquired from the optimally placed transducer, classification accuracy with equally spaced scanlines across the cross-sectional field of view was determined. Furthermore, the unique contribution of each scanline to class discrimination using Fisher criterion (FC) and mutual information (MI) with respect to motion discriminability was determined. Experiments with five able-bodied subjects show that the maximum muscle deformation occurred between 40%-50% of the forearm length for multiple degrees-of-freedom. The average classification accuracy was 94% ± 6% with the entire 128-scanline image and 94% ± 5% with four equally spaced scanlines. However, no significant improvement in classification accuracy was observed with optimal scanline selection using FC and MI. For an optimally placed transducer, a small subset of ultrasound scanlines can be used instead of a full imaging array without sacrificing performance in terms of classification accuracy for multiple degrees-of-freedom. The selection of a small subset of transducer elements can enable the reduction of computation, and simplification of the instrumentation and power consumption of wearable sonomyographic MCIs, particularly for rehabilitation and gesture recognition applications.
Sonomyography has been shown to be a promising method for decoding volitional motor intent from analysis of ultrasound images of the forearm musculature. The objectives of this paper are to determine the optimal location for ultrasound transducer placement on the anterior forearm for imaging maximum muscle deformations during different hand motions, and to investigate the effect of using a sparse set of ultrasound scanlines for motion classification for ultrasound-based muscle-computer interfaces (MCIs).OBJECTIVESonomyography has been shown to be a promising method for decoding volitional motor intent from analysis of ultrasound images of the forearm musculature. The objectives of this paper are to determine the optimal location for ultrasound transducer placement on the anterior forearm for imaging maximum muscle deformations during different hand motions, and to investigate the effect of using a sparse set of ultrasound scanlines for motion classification for ultrasound-based muscle-computer interfaces (MCIs).The optimal placement of the ultrasound transducer along the forearm was identified using freehand three-dimensional reconstructions of the muscle thickness during rest and motion completion. Based on the ultrasound images acquired from the optimally placed transducer, classification accuracy with equally spaced scanlines across the cross-sectional field of view was determined. Furthermore, the unique contribution of each scanline to class discrimination using Fisher criterion (FC) and mutual information (MI) with respect to motion discriminability was determined.METHODSThe optimal placement of the ultrasound transducer along the forearm was identified using freehand three-dimensional reconstructions of the muscle thickness during rest and motion completion. Based on the ultrasound images acquired from the optimally placed transducer, classification accuracy with equally spaced scanlines across the cross-sectional field of view was determined. Furthermore, the unique contribution of each scanline to class discrimination using Fisher criterion (FC) and mutual information (MI) with respect to motion discriminability was determined.Experiments with five able-bodied subjects show that the maximum muscle deformation occurred between 40%-50% of the forearm length for multiple degrees-of-freedom. The average classification accuracy was 94% ± 6% with the entire 128-scanline image and 94% ± 5% with four equally spaced scanlines. However, no significant improvement in classification accuracy was observed with optimal scanline selection using FC and MI.RESULTSExperiments with five able-bodied subjects show that the maximum muscle deformation occurred between 40%-50% of the forearm length for multiple degrees-of-freedom. The average classification accuracy was 94% ± 6% with the entire 128-scanline image and 94% ± 5% with four equally spaced scanlines. However, no significant improvement in classification accuracy was observed with optimal scanline selection using FC and MI.For an optimally placed transducer, a small subset of ultrasound scanlines can be used instead of a full imaging array without sacrificing performance in terms of classification accuracy for multiple degrees-of-freedom.CONCLUSIONFor an optimally placed transducer, a small subset of ultrasound scanlines can be used instead of a full imaging array without sacrificing performance in terms of classification accuracy for multiple degrees-of-freedom.The selection of a small subset of transducer elements can enable the reduction of computation, and simplification of the instrumentation and power consumption of wearable sonomyographic MCIs, particularly for rehabilitation and gesture recognition applications.SIGNIFICANCEThe selection of a small subset of transducer elements can enable the reduction of computation, and simplification of the instrumentation and power consumption of wearable sonomyographic MCIs, particularly for rehabilitation and gesture recognition applications.
Objective: Sonomyography has been shown to be a promising method for decoding volitional motor intent from analysis of ultrasound images of the forearm musculature. The objectives of this paper are to determine the optimal location for ultrasound transducer placement on the anterior forearm for imaging maximum muscle deformations during different hand motions, and to investigate the effect of using a sparse set of ultrasound scanlines for motion classification for ultrasound-based muscle-computer interfaces (MCIs). Methods: The optimal placement of the ultrasound transducer along the forearm was identified using freehand three-dimensional reconstructions of the muscle thickness during rest and motion completion. Based on the ultrasound images acquired from the optimally placed transducer, classification accuracy with equally spaced scanlines across the cross-sectional field of view was determined. Furthermore, the unique contribution of each scanline to class discrimination using Fisher criterion (FC) and mutual information (MI) with respect to motion discriminability was determined. Results: Experiments with five able-bodied subjects show that the maximum muscle deformation occurred between 40%-50% of the forearm length for multiple degrees-of-freedom. The average classification accuracy was 94% ± 6% with the entire 128-scanline image and 94% ± 5% with four equally spaced scanlines. However, no significant improvement in classification accuracy was observed with optimal scanline selection using FC and MI. Conclusion: For an optimally placed transducer, a small subset of ultrasound scanlines can be used instead of a full imaging array without sacrificing performance in terms of classification accuracy for multiple degrees-of-freedom. Significance: The selection of a small subset of transducer elements can enable the reduction of computation, and simplification of the instrumentation and power consumption of wearable sonomyographic MCIs, particularly for rehabilitation and gesture recognition applications.
Objective: Sonomyography has been shown to be a promising method for decoding volitional motor intent from analysis of ultrasound images of the forearm musculature. The objectives of this paper are to determine the optimal location for ultrasound transducer placement on the anterior forearm for imaging maximum muscle deformations during different hand motions, and to investigate the effect of using a sparse set of ultrasound scanlines for motion classification for ultrasound-based muscle–computer interfaces (MCIs). Methods: The optimal placement of the ultrasound transducer along the forearm was identified using freehand three-dimensional reconstructions of the muscle thickness during rest and motion completion. Based on the ultrasound images acquired from the optimally placed transducer, classification accuracy with equally spaced scanlines across the cross-sectional field of view was determined. Furthermore, the unique contribution of each scanline to class discrimination using Fisher criterion (FC) and mutual information (MI) with respect to motion discriminability was determined. Results: Experiments with five able-bodied subjects show that the maximum muscle deformation occurred between 40%–50% of the forearm length for multiple degrees-of-freedom. The average classification accuracy was 94% ± 6% with the entire 128-scanline image and 94% ± 5% with four equally spaced scanlines. However, no significant improvement in classification accuracy was observed with optimal scanline selection using FC and MI. Conclusion: For an optimally placed transducer, a small subset of ultrasound scanlines can be used instead of a full imaging array without sacrificing performance in terms of classification accuracy for multiple degrees-of-freedom. Significance: The selection of a small subset of transducer elements can enable the reduction of computation, and simplification of the instrumentation and power consumption of wearable sonomyographic MCIs, particularly for rehabilitation and gesture recognition applications.
Author Akhlaghi, Nima
Khan, Amir A.
Mukherjee, Biswarup
Truong, Cecile
Dhawan, Ananya
Diao, Guoqing
Sikdar, Siddhartha
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Nima
  surname: Akhlaghi
  fullname: Akhlaghi, Nima
  organization: Department of BionegineeringGeorge Mason University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ananya
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5167-5716
  surname: Dhawan
  fullname: Dhawan, Ananya
  organization: Department of Computer ScienceGeorge Mason University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Amir A.
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5400-3686
  surname: Khan
  fullname: Khan, Amir A.
  organization: Department of Bioengineering and the Center for Adaptive Systems of Brain-Body InteractionsGeorge Mason Univeristy
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Biswarup
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5528-3763
  surname: Mukherjee
  fullname: Mukherjee, Biswarup
  organization: Department of Bioengineering and the Center for Adaptive Systems of Brain-Body InteractionsGeorge Mason Univeristy
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Guoqing
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7304-9591
  surname: Diao
  fullname: Diao, Guoqing
  organization: Department of StatisticsGeorge Mason University
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Cecile
  surname: Truong
  fullname: Truong, Cecile
  organization: Department of BionegineeringGeorge Mason University
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Siddhartha
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6426-2320
  surname: Sikdar
  fullname: Sikdar, Siddhartha
  email: ssikdar@gmu.edu
  organization: Department of Bioengineering and the Center for Adaptive Systems of Brain-Body Interactions, George Mason Univeristy, Fairfax, VA, USA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31150331$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp90U1L7DAUBuAgio4fP0AEKbhx0zEnH9NkJTp4r4LiQl2HTOdEI21Tk3Yx_94MM96Fi7tJCDzvgZz3kOx2oUNCToFOAai-er19upsyCnrKNGih1A6ZgJSqZJLDLplQCqrUTIsDcpjSZ34KJWb75IADSMo5TMj1S29j8sOquOlss0o-FcEVtngJXWhX4T3a_sPXxdOY6gbLeWj7ccBYPHT5dLbGY7LnbJPwZHsfkbc_d6_z-_Lx-e_D_OaxrLnQQ1ktqqWzAoE5IcEq7hxHqiSzVC31TFIAvXCKOTvDZY2VFk5RPmNUZEyR8iNyuZnbx_A1YhpM61ONTWM7DGMyjHGupNC6yvTiF_0MY8y_y4pLrakCClmdb9W4aHFp-uhbG1fmZzUZVBtQx5BSRGdqP9jBh26I1jcGqFmXYNYlmHUJZltCTsKv5M_w_2XONhmPiP-8qpiUTPBvtaaP4A
CODEN IEBEAX
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_s23041885
crossref_primary_10_1109_TSMC_2024_3358960
crossref_primary_10_1109_MRA_2022_3177486
crossref_primary_10_1109_TMRB_2022_3172680
crossref_primary_10_1109_TNSRE_2021_3134189
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_1020546
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12652_020_01913_3
crossref_primary_10_1108_AA_11_2020_0178
crossref_primary_10_1089_soro_2022_0065
crossref_primary_10_1109_JSEN_2024_3394029
crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2024_3414419
crossref_primary_10_3390_s24155043
crossref_primary_10_25122_jml_2022_0285
crossref_primary_10_1109_TMRB_2024_3522502
crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2020_3032077
crossref_primary_10_1097_JPO_0000000000000482
crossref_primary_10_1109_JTEHM_2022_3140973
crossref_primary_10_1109_TMECH_2022_3171086
crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2022_876836
Cites_doi 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2196711
10.1109/TRO.2007.910708
10.1109/TBME.2015.2498124
10.1186/s13634-015-0251-9
10.1016/j.bspc.2016.01.011
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.08.003
10.1109/SMC.2015.251
10.1177/016173460803000104
10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259833
10.1109/TIE.2019.2898614
10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2185843
10.1016/S1361-8415(00)00034-7
10.1109/TBME.2012.2198821
10.1109/ICBECS.2010.5462343
10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591414
10.1109/TNSRE.2008.926707
10.1109/TMI.2003.815867
10.1109/JSEN.2019.2903532
10.1109/TBME.2009.2026181
10.1007/978-3-319-08072-7_41
10.1109/HealthCom.2016.7749483
10.1145/1731903.1731924
10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.07.012
10.1109/iww-BCI.2014.6782565
10.1016/j.ins.2010.05.027
10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260329
10.1259/bjr/80676194
10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4353509
10.1214/088342304000000558
10.1682/JRRD.2009.03.0031
10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v30.i456.80
10.1145/1622176.1622208
10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2274657
10.1145/1357054.1357138
10.1016/S0301-5629(02)00735-4
10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2829913
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.04.015
10.1145/1753326.1753451
10.1145/3025453.3025807
10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2207916
10.1007/s10856-008-3492-4
10.1109/TNSRE.2005.847357
10.1186/1475-925X-13-102
10.1109/TBME.2006.883695
10.1109/BIOROB.2014.6913835
10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2039619
10.1109/TBME.2010.2082539
10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2175488
10.2147/MDER.S91102
10.1109/TBME.2012.2205990
10.1007/s00422-008-0278-1
10.1109/JBHI.2013.2249590
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.04.021
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2020
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2020
DBID 97E
RIA
RIE
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QF
7QO
7QQ
7SC
7SE
7SP
7SR
7TA
7TB
7U5
8BQ
8FD
F28
FR3
H8D
JG9
JQ2
KR7
L7M
L~C
L~D
P64
7X8
DOI 10.1109/TBME.2019.2919488
DatabaseName IEEE Xplore (IEEE)
IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998–Present
IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Aluminium Industry Abstracts
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Ceramic Abstracts
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts
Corrosion Abstracts
Electronics & Communications Abstracts
Engineered Materials Abstracts
Materials Business File
Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts
Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts
METADEX
Technology Research Database
ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering
Engineering Research Database
Aerospace Database
Materials Research Database
ProQuest Computer Science Collection
Civil Engineering Abstracts
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Materials Research Database
Civil Engineering Abstracts
Aluminium Industry Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic
Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts
Electronics & Communications Abstracts
ProQuest Computer Science Collection
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts
Ceramic Abstracts
Materials Business File
METADEX
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional
Aerospace Database
Engineered Materials Abstracts
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Corrosion Abstracts
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic

Materials Research Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: RIE
  name: IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Engineering
EISSN 1558-2531
EndPage 696
ExternalDocumentID 31150331
10_1109_TBME_2019_2919488
8725524
Genre orig-research
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NSF
  grantid: CNS 1329829; USAMRAA W81XWH-16-1-0722
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.55
.DC
.GJ
0R~
29I
4.4
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6IF
6IK
6IL
6IN
85S
97E
AAJGR
AARMG
AASAJ
AAWTH
AAYJJ
ABAZT
ABJNI
ABQJQ
ABVLG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACKIV
ACNCT
ACPRK
ADZIZ
AENEX
AETIX
AFFNX
AFRAH
AGQYO
AGSQL
AHBIQ
AI.
AIBXA
AKJIK
AKQYR
ALLEH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ASUFR
ATWAV
BEFXN
BFFAM
BGNUA
BKEBE
BPEOZ
CHZPO
CS3
DU5
EBS
EJD
F5P
HZ~
H~9
IAAWW
IBMZZ
ICLAB
IDIHD
IEGSK
IFIPE
IFJZH
IPLJI
JAVBF
LAI
MS~
O9-
OCL
P2P
RIA
RIE
RIL
RNS
TAE
TN5
VH1
VJK
X7M
ZGI
ZXP
AAYXX
CITATION
RIG
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PKN
7QF
7QO
7QQ
7SC
7SE
7SP
7SR
7TA
7TB
7U5
8BQ
8FD
F28
FR3
H8D
JG9
JQ2
KR7
L7M
L~C
L~D
P64
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-7b7dfa4e12f451a83ff3e0852a08d9650119bf82fa6edce794f80362041a80e03
IEDL.DBID RIE
ISSN 0018-9294
1558-2531
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 04:18:41 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 08:50:19 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:29:20 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:28:32 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:01:11 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 27 06:31:21 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
License https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplorehelp/downloads/license-information/IEEE.html
https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029
https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-037
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c349t-7b7dfa4e12f451a83ff3e0852a08d9650119bf82fa6edce794f80362041a80e03
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-5167-5716
0000-0001-7304-9591
0000-0001-5400-3686
0000-0002-6426-2320
0000-0001-5528-3763
PMID 31150331
PQID 2359908101
PQPubID 85474
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs crossref_citationtrail_10_1109_TBME_2019_2919488
proquest_miscellaneous_2233854997
ieee_primary_8725524
crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2019_2919488
proquest_journals_2359908101
pubmed_primary_31150331
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-03-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-03-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: New York
PublicationTitle IEEE transactions on biomedical engineering
PublicationTitleAbbrev TBME
PublicationTitleAlternate IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher IEEE
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Publisher_xml – name: IEEE
– name: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
References ref57
ref13
ref12
ref15
arvaneh (ref42) 0
li (ref20) 2010; 18
ref14
ref53
ref52
ref55
ref11
ref54
ref10
ref17
ref16
ref18
ref51
ref50
ref46
ref48
ref47
ref41
ref44
(ref33) 2016
ref43
ref49
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
ref40
ref35
ref34
ref37
ref31
ref30
ref32
ref2
chu (ref19) 2006; 53
ref1
ref39
ref38
netter (ref45) 2006
ref24
ref23
ref26
ref25
ref22
ref21
ref28
ref27
ref29
recognition (ref36) 2018; 26
gosling (ref56) 1985
References_xml – ident: ref6
  doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2196711
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1109/TRO.2007.910708
– ident: ref30
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2498124
– ident: ref57
  doi: 10.1186/s13634-015-0251-9
– ident: ref41
  doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2016.01.011
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.08.003
– ident: ref35
  doi: 10.1109/SMC.2015.251
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.1177/016173460803000104
– ident: ref48
  doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259833
– ident: ref38
  doi: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2898614
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2185843
– year: 1985
  ident: ref56
  publication-title: Atlas Human Anatomy With Integrated Text
– ident: ref47
  doi: 10.1016/S1361-8415(00)00034-7
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2198821
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1109/ICBECS.2010.5462343
– ident: ref31
  doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591414
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2008.926707
– ident: ref52
  doi: 10.1109/TMI.2003.815867
– ident: ref37
  doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2903532
– ident: ref54
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2026181
– ident: ref40
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-08072-7_41
– ident: ref34
  doi: 10.1109/HealthCom.2016.7749483
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1145/1731903.1731924
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.07.012
– ident: ref51
  doi: 10.1109/iww-BCI.2014.6782565
– ident: ref43
  doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2010.05.027
– year: 2016
  ident: ref33
  article-title: Philips Lumify, portable ultrasound
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260329
– ident: ref46
  doi: 10.1259/bjr/80676194
– ident: ref39
  doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4353509
– ident: ref55
  doi: 10.1214/088342304000000558
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2009.03.0031
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v30.i456.80
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1145/1622176.1622208
– ident: ref29
  doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2274657
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1145/1357054.1357138
– start-page: 225
  year: 0
  ident: ref42
  article-title: EEG channel selection using decision tree in brain-computer interface
  publication-title: Proc 2nd APSIPA Annu Summit Conf
– ident: ref44
  doi: 10.1016/S0301-5629(02)00735-4
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1199
  year: 2018
  ident: ref36
  article-title: Towards wearable a-mode ultrasound sensing for real-time finger motion recognition
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng
  doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2829913
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.04.015
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753451
– ident: ref28
  doi: 10.1145/3025453.3025807
– ident: ref27
  doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2207916
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.1007/s10856-008-3492-4
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.847357
– ident: ref50
  doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-102
– volume: 53
  start-page: 2232
  year: 2006
  ident: ref19
  article-title: A real-time EMG pattern recognition system based on linear-nonlinear feature projection for a multifunction myoelectric hand
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2006.883695
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.1109/BIOROB.2014.6913835
– volume: 18
  start-page: 185
  year: 2010
  ident: ref20
  article-title: Quantifying pattern recognition- based myoelectric control of multifunctional transradial prostheses
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng
  doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2039619
– ident: ref53
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2082539
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2175488
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.2147/MDER.S91102
– ident: ref49
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2205990
– year: 2006
  ident: ref45
  publication-title: Atlas of Human Anatomy
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1007/s00422-008-0278-1
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2013.2249590
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.04.021
SSID ssj0014846
Score 2.4395428
Snippet Objective: Sonomyography has been shown to be a promising method for decoding volitional motor intent from analysis of ultrasound images of the forearm...
Sonomyography has been shown to be a promising method for decoding volitional motor intent from analysis of ultrasound images of the forearm musculature. The...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
ieee
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 688
SubjectTerms Accuracy
Classification
Deformation effects
Degrees of freedom
Electromyography - instrumentation
Electromyography - methods
Equipment Design
Field of view
Fisher criterion
Forearm
Forearm - diagnostic imaging
Forearm - physiology
Gesture recognition
Humans
Image acquisition
Image classification
Imaging
Instrumentation
Interfaces
Movement - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - diagnostic imaging
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Muscle-computer interface
Muscles
mutual information
Optimization
Placement
Power consumption
Probes
prosthesis control
Rehabilitation
Sensors
Three-dimensional displays
Transducers
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography - instrumentation
Ultrasonography - methods
Ultrasound
ultrasound imaging
Wearable Electronic Devices
wearable system
Title Sparsity Analysis of a Sonomyographic Muscle-Computer Interface
URI https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8725524
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31150331
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2359908101
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2233854997
Volume 67
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3dT9tADLcKD2g8bKx8ZWNTkHialnK5c5vcI0ytKqTwQpF4iy6JT0KgtoLmZX_9fJePTRMg3iLFuST2WbbP9s8AZ0qhYcOB0dhwpINYxJFJEopMxeZNFWzyjTvQz64n81u8uhvfDeBn3wtDRL74jEbu0ufyq1VZu6Oy8zRhB1jiFmxx4Nb0avUZA0ybphwRswJLjW0GMxb6fHGZTV0Rlx5JzTG7H7Ly1wb5oSqv-5fezsw-QdZ9YVNe8jCqN8Wo_P0feON7f2EPPrYOZ3jR7JDPMKDlEHb_gSEcwk7WJtj32XdfG1-mEXZoJeHKhia88b0PDbz1fRlm9TMvFnUjIUJ_rmhNSQdwO5sufs2jdsZCVCrUmygpksoapFhaHMcmVdYqYjdMGpFWmt23ONaFTaU1E1cvytprU2f0BDKxIKEOYXu5WtIxhMxhNFQVukwNKqt1pUmnOlHVBAmRAhAd1_OyBSB3czAecx-ICJ07QeVOUHkrqAB-9I-sG_SNt4j3Hb97wpbVAZx0os1b_XzOpRqzGXbgZgGc9rdZs1y6xCxpVTON5PDdhc9JAEfNlujXdhhFQqn4y8vv_AofpIvLfa3aCWxvnmr6xs7Lpvjud-0f0Pznwg
linkProvider IEEE
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1LT9xADLYolfo49AG0pECbSpxQs8zD2WSOBYGWlnDpInGLJolHqlrtorK59NfjmTxaVVBxixRnkthjffb4BbCvNVoGDkxSy54OYiUTm2WU2IbhTVcM-dYf6BcX09klfrlKr9bg01gLQ0Qh-Ywm_jLE8ptl3fqjssM8YwNY4SN4zLifyq5aa4wZYN6V5QjJKqwM9jFMKczh_Kg48WlcZqIMe-1hzMofFApjVe63MAPSnL6EYvjGLsHkx6RdVZP69z_tGx_6E6_gRW9yxp-7PfIa1mixAc__akS4AU-KPsS-ydb7tQ2JGvHQryReutjG30L1Q9fg-nsdF-0NL5YMQyHicLLobE1bcHl6Mj-eJf2UhaTWaFZJVmWNs0hSOUylzbVzmtgQU1bkjWEDTkpTuVw5O_UZo6y_LvewJ5CJBQn9BtYXywVtQ8wcRktNZerconbGNIZMbjLdTJEQKQIxcL2s-xbkfhLGzzK4IsKUXlClF1TZCyqCg_GR667_xv-INz2_R8Ke1RHsDqItew29KZVOGYh9e7MIPo63Wbd8wMQuaNkyjWIH3jvQWQRvuy0xru27FAmt5bu73_kBns7mxXl5fnbxdQeeKe-lh8y1XVhf_Wppj02ZVfU-7OBbELPrCw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sparsity+Analysis+of+a+Sonomyographic+Muscle-Computer+Interface&rft.jtitle=IEEE+transactions+on+biomedical+engineering&rft.au=Akhlaghi%2C+Nima&rft.au=Dhawan%2C+Ananya&rft.au=Khan%2C+Amir+A.&rft.au=Mukherjee%2C+Biswarup&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.pub=IEEE&rft.issn=0018-9294&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=688&rft.epage=696&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109%2FTBME.2019.2919488&rft.externalDocID=8725524
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0018-9294&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0018-9294&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0018-9294&client=summon