Assessment of occupational exposure and radiation risks in nuclear medicine departments

• Published in: Radiation physics and chemistry (Oxford, England : 1993) Vol. 170; p. 108529
• Main Authors: Alkhorayef, M., Mayhoub, Fareed H., Salah, Hassan, Sulieman, A., Al-Mohammed, H.I., Almuwannis, M., Kappas, C., Bradley, D.A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2020; Elsevier BV
• Subjects: Computed tomography; Dosimeters; Drug dosages; Exposure; Ionizing radiation; Lithium fluoride; Medical imaging; Nuclear engineering; Nuclear medicine; Nuclear safety; Occupational exposure; Occupational health; Personnel; PET/CT; Photon emission; Positron emission; Radiation dosage; Radiation risk; Radioisotopes; Research facilities; Tomography; Nuclear medicine; Radiation risk; Occupational exposure; PET/CT
• ISSN: 0969-806X; 1879-0895
• DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108529

During the preparation of radioisotopes, during their administration and during patient imaging nuclear medicine personnel are routinely exposed to ionising radiation. With radiation risks increasing with dose, safety assessment is required in seeking to ensure practice complies with international guidelines and dose limits. A particular aim herein is to measure staff exposures during certain molecular imaging procedures including through use of positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) procedures. Over a one-year period occupational doses were monitored for 30 nuclear medicine personnel at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC) in Riyadh. Dose equivalent values were measured in terms of Hp (10) (deep dose) and Hp (0.07) (skin dose), extremity doses also being measured via ring dosimeters. The measurements were made using calibrated thermoluminescent dosimeters, type LiF:Mg, Ti (TLD-100). In mSv, the respective mean annual dose and range for Hp (10), Hp (0.07) and extremities were 3.05 ± 2.1 (0.23–0.91), 3.15 ± 2.2 (0.1–9.1) and 28.25 (0.1–298.0). In all cases, extremity dose values were well below the annual dose limit (500 mSv). Nevertheless, with personnel doses varying significantly, careful assessment of working conditions is recommended in efforts to ensure occupational exposures remain below annual dose limits. •Occupational doses were monitored for 30 nuclear medicine personnel over one year using thermoluminescent dosimeters.•The dose was quantified in terms of Hp (10) and Hp (0.07) and extremity doses.•Occupational doses were below the annual dose limits for whole body and extremities.•Careful assessment of working conditions are recommended in seeking to reduce gender differences in occupational exposures.