Diagnostic performance of volatile organic compounds analysis and electronic noses for detecting colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The detection of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) could provide a potential diagnostic modality for the early detection and surveillance of colorectal cancers. However, the overall diagnostic accuracy of the proposed tests remains uncertain. This systematic review is to ascertain the diagnostic acc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in oncology Vol. 14; p. 1397259
Main Authors Wang, Qiaoling, Fang, Yu, Tan, Shiyan, Li, Zhuohong, Zheng, Ruyi, Ren, Yifeng, Jiang, Yifang, Huang, Xiaopeng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 13.05.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The detection of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) could provide a potential diagnostic modality for the early detection and surveillance of colorectal cancers. However, the overall diagnostic accuracy of the proposed tests remains uncertain. This systematic review is to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of using VOC analysis techniques and electronic noses (e-noses) as noninvasive diagnostic methods for colorectal cancer within the realm of clinical practice. A systematic search was undertaken on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to scrutinize pertinent studies published from their inception to September 1, 2023. Only studies conducted on human subjects were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate model to obtain summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was deployed for quality assessment. The protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO, and PRISMA guidelines were used for the identification, screening, eligibility, and selection process. This review encompassed 32 studies, 22 studies for VOC analysis and 9 studies for e-nose, one for both, with a total of 4688 subjects in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of VOC analysis for CRC detection were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.92) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.90), respectively. In the case of e-nose, the pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.90), and the pooled specificity was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.88). The area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) curve for VOC analysis and e-noses were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.95) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92), respectively. The outcomes of this review substantiate the commendable accuracy of VOC analysis and e-nose technology in detecting CRC. VOC analysis has a higher specificity than e-nose for the diagnosis of CRC and a sensitivity comparable to that of e-nose. However, numerous limitations, including a modest sample size, absence of standardized collection methods, lack of external validation, and a notable risk of bias, were identified. Consequently, there exists an imperative need for expansive, multi-center clinical studies to elucidate the applicability and reproducibility of VOC analysis or e-nose in the noninvasive diagnosis of colorectal cancer. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42023398465.
AbstractList IntroductionThe detection of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) could provide a potential diagnostic modality for the early detection and surveillance of colorectal cancers. However, the overall diagnostic accuracy of the proposed tests remains uncertain.ObjectiveThis systematic review is to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of using VOC analysis techniques and electronic noses (e-noses) as noninvasive diagnostic methods for colorectal cancer within the realm of clinical practice.MethodsA systematic search was undertaken on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to scrutinize pertinent studies published from their inception to September 1, 2023. Only studies conducted on human subjects were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate model to obtain summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was deployed for quality assessment. The protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO, and PRISMA guidelines were used for the identification, screening, eligibility, and selection process.ResultsThis review encompassed 32 studies, 22 studies for VOC analysis and 9 studies for e-nose, one for both, with a total of 4688 subjects in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of VOC analysis for CRC detection were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.92) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.90), respectively. In the case of e-nose, the pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.90), and the pooled specificity was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.88). The area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) curve for VOC analysis and e-noses were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.95) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92), respectively.ConclusionThe outcomes of this review substantiate the commendable accuracy of VOC analysis and e-nose technology in detecting CRC. VOC analysis has a higher specificity than e-nose for the diagnosis of CRC and a sensitivity comparable to that of e-nose. However, numerous limitations, including a modest sample size, absence of standardized collection methods, lack of external validation, and a notable risk of bias, were identified. Consequently, there exists an imperative need for expansive, multi-center clinical studies to elucidate the applicability and reproducibility of VOC analysis or e-nose in the noninvasive diagnosis of colorectal cancer.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42023398465.
Introduction The detection of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) could provide a potential diagnostic modality for the early detection and surveillance of colorectal cancers. However, the overall diagnostic accuracy of the proposed tests remains uncertain. Objective This systematic review is to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of using VOC analysis techniques and electronic noses (e-noses) as noninvasive diagnostic methods for colorectal cancer within the realm of clinical practice. Methods A systematic search was undertaken on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to scrutinize pertinent studies published from their inception to September 1, 2023. Only studies conducted on human subjects were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate model to obtain summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was deployed for quality assessment. The protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO, and PRISMA guidelines were used for the identification, screening, eligibility, and selection process. Results This review encompassed 32 studies, 22 studies for VOC analysis and 9 studies for e-nose, one for both, with a total of 4688 subjects in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of VOC analysis for CRC detection were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.92) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.90), respectively. In the case of e-nose, the pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.90), and the pooled specificity was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.88). The area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) curve for VOC analysis and e-noses were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.95) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92), respectively. Conclusion The outcomes of this review substantiate the commendable accuracy of VOC analysis and e-nose technology in detecting CRC. VOC analysis has a higher specificity than e-nose for the diagnosis of CRC and a sensitivity comparable to that of e-nose. However, numerous limitations, including a modest sample size, absence of standardized collection methods, lack of external validation, and a notable risk of bias, were identified. Consequently, there exists an imperative need for expansive, multi-center clinical studies to elucidate the applicability and reproducibility of VOC analysis or e-nose in the noninvasive diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails , identifier CRD42023398465.
The detection of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) could provide a potential diagnostic modality for the early detection and surveillance of colorectal cancers. However, the overall diagnostic accuracy of the proposed tests remains uncertain.IntroductionThe detection of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) could provide a potential diagnostic modality for the early detection and surveillance of colorectal cancers. However, the overall diagnostic accuracy of the proposed tests remains uncertain.This systematic review is to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of using VOC analysis techniques and electronic noses (e-noses) as noninvasive diagnostic methods for colorectal cancer within the realm of clinical practice.ObjectiveThis systematic review is to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of using VOC analysis techniques and electronic noses (e-noses) as noninvasive diagnostic methods for colorectal cancer within the realm of clinical practice.A systematic search was undertaken on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to scrutinize pertinent studies published from their inception to September 1, 2023. Only studies conducted on human subjects were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate model to obtain summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was deployed for quality assessment. The protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO, and PRISMA guidelines were used for the identification, screening, eligibility, and selection process.MethodsA systematic search was undertaken on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to scrutinize pertinent studies published from their inception to September 1, 2023. Only studies conducted on human subjects were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate model to obtain summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was deployed for quality assessment. The protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO, and PRISMA guidelines were used for the identification, screening, eligibility, and selection process.This review encompassed 32 studies, 22 studies for VOC analysis and 9 studies for e-nose, one for both, with a total of 4688 subjects in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of VOC analysis for CRC detection were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.92) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.90), respectively. In the case of e-nose, the pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.90), and the pooled specificity was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.88). The area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) curve for VOC analysis and e-noses were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.95) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92), respectively.ResultsThis review encompassed 32 studies, 22 studies for VOC analysis and 9 studies for e-nose, one for both, with a total of 4688 subjects in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of VOC analysis for CRC detection were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.92) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.90), respectively. In the case of e-nose, the pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.90), and the pooled specificity was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.88). The area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) curve for VOC analysis and e-noses were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.95) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92), respectively.The outcomes of this review substantiate the commendable accuracy of VOC analysis and e-nose technology in detecting CRC. VOC analysis has a higher specificity than e-nose for the diagnosis of CRC and a sensitivity comparable to that of e-nose. However, numerous limitations, including a modest sample size, absence of standardized collection methods, lack of external validation, and a notable risk of bias, were identified. Consequently, there exists an imperative need for expansive, multi-center clinical studies to elucidate the applicability and reproducibility of VOC analysis or e-nose in the noninvasive diagnosis of colorectal cancer.ConclusionThe outcomes of this review substantiate the commendable accuracy of VOC analysis and e-nose technology in detecting CRC. VOC analysis has a higher specificity than e-nose for the diagnosis of CRC and a sensitivity comparable to that of e-nose. However, numerous limitations, including a modest sample size, absence of standardized collection methods, lack of external validation, and a notable risk of bias, were identified. Consequently, there exists an imperative need for expansive, multi-center clinical studies to elucidate the applicability and reproducibility of VOC analysis or e-nose in the noninvasive diagnosis of colorectal cancer.https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42023398465.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42023398465.
The detection of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) could provide a potential diagnostic modality for the early detection and surveillance of colorectal cancers. However, the overall diagnostic accuracy of the proposed tests remains uncertain. This systematic review is to ascertain the diagnostic accuracy of using VOC analysis techniques and electronic noses (e-noses) as noninvasive diagnostic methods for colorectal cancer within the realm of clinical practice. A systematic search was undertaken on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to scrutinize pertinent studies published from their inception to September 1, 2023. Only studies conducted on human subjects were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate model to obtain summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was deployed for quality assessment. The protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO, and PRISMA guidelines were used for the identification, screening, eligibility, and selection process. This review encompassed 32 studies, 22 studies for VOC analysis and 9 studies for e-nose, one for both, with a total of 4688 subjects in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of VOC analysis for CRC detection were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.92) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.90), respectively. In the case of e-nose, the pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.90), and the pooled specificity was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.88). The area under the receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC) curve for VOC analysis and e-noses were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.95) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92), respectively. The outcomes of this review substantiate the commendable accuracy of VOC analysis and e-nose technology in detecting CRC. VOC analysis has a higher specificity than e-nose for the diagnosis of CRC and a sensitivity comparable to that of e-nose. However, numerous limitations, including a modest sample size, absence of standardized collection methods, lack of external validation, and a notable risk of bias, were identified. Consequently, there exists an imperative need for expansive, multi-center clinical studies to elucidate the applicability and reproducibility of VOC analysis or e-nose in the noninvasive diagnosis of colorectal cancer. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42023398465.
Author Ren, Yifeng
Li, Zhuohong
Huang, Xiaopeng
Fang, Yu
Tan, Shiyan
Zheng, Ruyi
Wang, Qiaoling
Jiang, Yifang
AuthorAffiliation 2 Second Department of Oncology, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Chengdu, Sichuan , China
1 TCM Regulating Metabolic Diseases Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Chengdu, Sichuan , China
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Second Department of Oncology, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Chengdu, Sichuan , China
– name: 1 TCM Regulating Metabolic Diseases Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine , Chengdu, Sichuan , China
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Qiaoling
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Qiaoling
  organization: TCM Regulating Metabolic Diseases Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Yu
  surname: Fang
  fullname: Fang, Yu
  organization: Second Department of Oncology, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Shiyan
  surname: Tan
  fullname: Tan, Shiyan
  organization: Second Department of Oncology, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Zhuohong
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Zhuohong
  organization: Second Department of Oncology, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ruyi
  surname: Zheng
  fullname: Zheng, Ruyi
  organization: Second Department of Oncology, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Yifeng
  surname: Ren
  fullname: Ren, Yifeng
  organization: TCM Regulating Metabolic Diseases Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Yifang
  surname: Jiang
  fullname: Jiang, Yifang
  organization: TCM Regulating Metabolic Diseases Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Xiaopeng
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Xiaopeng
  organization: TCM Regulating Metabolic Diseases Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38817891$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpVksluFDEQhi0URMKQB-CC-silB2-9mAtCYYsUiQtI3Kxqd3lw5LYHu2fQPApvizsziRJf_KuWr6qk_yU5CzEgIa8ZXQvRq3c2BrPmlMs1E6rjjXpGLjgXslZS_Dp7pM_JZc63tLy2oYyKF-Rc9D3resUuyL9PDjYh5tmZaovJxjRBMFhFW-2jh9n5otMGQsmbOG3jLoy5ggD-kN0ixgo9mjnFpaKAMFcFUo04l6gLm9LlYyoafGUWdHpfQZUPecYJlqkJ9w7_3pEmnKG-Z78izy34jJenf0V-fvn84-pbffP96_XVx5vaCNnPNZoGjFEA1AzWNBQ7NKOlljLFbQMgR5C9FF1PrWJUUTly2XWtbZmEwfBGrMj1kTtGuNXb5CZIBx3B6btAOV5DKot61C3nqhVlluBUgqJDZzsrLLdWqXaQfWF9OLK2u2HC0WCYE_gn0KeZ4H7rTdxrxpjoGZWF8PZESPHPDvOsJ5cNeg8B4y5rQVshm06W-hVhx1KTYs4J7cMcRvViEb1YRC8W0SeLlJ43jxd86Lg3hPgPUb2_EQ
Cites_doi 10.1021/cr300174a
10.1093/jb/mvr090
10.1039/c2an36193k
10.3390/cancers14092127
10.1128/CMR.00020-13
10.3390/molecules26030550
10.3390/s21165440
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001471
10.1088/1752-7155/9/4/047110
10.1088/1752-7155/9/2/027101
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016
10.1016/j.trsl.2015.01.005
10.3390/cancers12061471
10.1097/MCP.0000000000000978
10.1016/j.bios.2014.10.044
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0302
10.3748/wjg.v22.i4.1639
10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317124
10.1016/0925-4005(94)87085-3
10.1111/apt.16405
10.3322/caac.21660
10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.002
10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.028
10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.1570
10.1186/s12931-021-01835-4
10.1007/s00405-016-4320-y
10.1371/journal.pone.0108750
10.3390/bios6010004
10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5303
10.1111/apt.15622
10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312388.361
10.1038/s41575-022-00612-y
10.1002/bjs5.50354
10.1002/ijc.29166
10.1136/bmj.b2700
10.1002/ijc.28446
10.1371/journal.pone.0130301
10.1097/SLA.0000000000002539
10.1007/s10151-016-1457-z
10.1088/1752-7163/ab5b3c
10.1002/0471142727.mb3004s114
10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2815
10.1088/1752-7163/aaf3dc
10.1007/s10151-019-01963-6
10.7326/M18-2390
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.19372
10.1016/j.cca.2023.117273
10.18632/oncotarget.v6i42
10.1111/codi.15009
10.1016/S0016-5085(15)30059-7
10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32319-0
10.1088/1752-7163/aa5e76
10.1111/codi.14431
10.1002/ags3.12056
10.3390/bios10080084
10.1016/j.cgh.2014.05.005
10.1002/bjs.8942
10.14309/ctg.0000000000000518
10.1007/s10151-013-1096-6
10.1111/codi.14739
10.1111/apt.15140
10.1080/02813432.2020.1844391
10.1016/j.molmed.2015.08.001
10.3390/ijms21249416
10.1038/sj.bjc.6605810
10.1002/ijc.29701
10.4161/cbt.26723
10.1016/S0016-5085(12)62029-0
10.1016/j.job.2020.05.002
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2024 Wang, Fang, Tan, Li, Zheng, Ren, Jiang and Huang.
Copyright © 2024 Wang, Fang, Tan, Li, Zheng, Ren, Jiang and Huang 2024 Wang, Fang, Tan, Li, Zheng, Ren, Jiang and Huang
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2024 Wang, Fang, Tan, Li, Zheng, Ren, Jiang and Huang.
– notice: Copyright © 2024 Wang, Fang, Tan, Li, Zheng, Ren, Jiang and Huang 2024 Wang, Fang, Tan, Li, Zheng, Ren, Jiang and Huang
DBID NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2024.1397259
DatabaseName PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2234-943X
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_6229639aa3204a90b7f7f3f2ff996b48
10_3389_fonc_2024_1397259
38817891
Genre Systematic Review
GroupedDBID 53G
5VS
9T4
AAFWJ
AAKDD
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACXDI
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AFPKN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
DIK
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
IAO
IEA
IHR
IHW
IPNFZ
KQ8
M48
M~E
NPM
OK1
PGMZT
RIG
RNS
RPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-ec5acc9aa0cbfc50e7ecdf0f0192f5aa4da4843780f910904d24776f614abc253
IEDL.DBID RPM
ISSN 2234-943X
IngestDate Tue Oct 22 15:03:05 EDT 2024
Tue Sep 17 21:28:10 EDT 2024
Sat Oct 26 04:54:55 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 26 15:43:16 EDT 2024
Sat Nov 02 12:26:30 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords VOCs
diagnosis
electronic nose
colorectal cancer
volatile organic compounds
E-nose
Language English
License Copyright © 2024 Wang, Fang, Tan, Li, Zheng, Ren, Jiang and Huang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c348t-ec5acc9aa0cbfc50e7ecdf0f0192f5aa4da4843780f910904d24776f614abc253
Notes content type line 23
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
Christos Pitros, General University Hospital of Patras, Greece
These authors share first authorship
Reviewed by: Dimitrios Kehagias, General University Hospital of Patras, Greece
Edited by: Francesk Mulita, General University Hospital of Patras, Greece
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11138104/
PMID 38817891
PQID 3063457411
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6229639aa3204a90b7f7f3f2ff996b48
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11138104
proquest_miscellaneous_3063457411
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1397259
pubmed_primary_38817891
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-05-13
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-05-13
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-05-13
  day: 13
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Switzerland
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Switzerland
PublicationTitle Frontiers in oncology
PublicationTitleAlternate Front Oncol
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Frontiers Media S.A
Publisher_xml – name: Frontiers Media S.A
References Depalma (B39) 2014; 18
Peng (B15) 2010; 103
van Keulen (B25) 2019; 51
Arasaradnam (B32) 2014; 9
Westenbrink (B53) 2015; 67
Batty (B33) 2015; 10
Bouza (B18) 2017; 11
Politi (B7) 2021; 26
Wang (B10) 2014; 15
Barash (B16) 2015; 6
Tyagi (B47) 2021; 21
Dekker (B2) 2019; 394
Boulind (B37) 2022; 14
Scheepers (B22) 2022; 5
Esfahani (B64) 2016; 6
Bertels (B5) 2020; 38
Amal (B58) 2016; 138
van Keulen (B24) 2021; 22
Shaukat (B3) 2022; 19
Markar (B43) 2019; 269
Zambrana Tevar (B49) 2012; 30
van Liere (B60) 2023; 186
Altomare (B30) 2020; 4
Fiehn (B68) 2016; 114
Liberati (B27) 2009; 339
de Boer (B13) 2014; 12
Bel'skaya (B34) 2020; 62
Imperiale (B4) 2019; 170
van de Goor (B52) 2017; 274
Sethi (B11) 2013; 26
Amal (B14) 2015; 136
Leja (B41) 2015; 148
Corradi (B17) 2015; 9
Lena (B42) 2012; 142
McFarlane (B44) 2019; 21
Hanna (B59) 2019; 5
Chandrapalan (B61) 2021; 54
Westenbrink (B54) 2016; 65
Altomare (B50) 2016; 20
Widlak (B48) 2018; 20
Baldini (B69) 2020; 10
Shirasu (B8) 2011; 150
Zonta (B55) 2020; 12
Bosch (B36) 2020; 22
Hakim (B9) 2012; 112
de Meij (B26) 2014; 134
Sung (B1) 2021; 71
Boots (B67) 2015; 21
Altomare (B29) 2015; 262
Psutka (B46) 2017; 77
Ishibe (B40) 2018; 2
Gardner (B21) 1994; 18
Altomare (B28) 2013; 100
Mochalski (B63) 2013; 138
Qin (B20) 2010; 19
Alustiza (B31) 2023; 542
Steenhuis (B51) 2020; 46
Deeks (B57) 2005; 58
Monedeiro (B12) 2020; 14
Guo (B19) 2015; 166
Ghimenti (B62) 2015; 9
Krilaviciute (B66) 2019; 13
Bond (B35) 2019; 49
Mozdiak (B45) 2019; 23
van der Sar (B70) 2023; 29
Cheng (B38) 2022; 13
Licht (B23) 2020; 21
Whiting (B56) 2011; 155
Chan (B65) 2016; 22
Chen (B6) 2019; 68
References_xml – volume: 112
  year: 2012
  ident: B9
  article-title: Volatile organic compounds of lung cancer and possible biochemical pathways
  publication-title: Chem Rev
  doi: 10.1021/cr300174a
  contributor:
    fullname: Hakim
– volume: 150
  year: 2011
  ident: B8
  article-title: The scent of disease: volatile organic compounds of the human body related to disease and disorder
  publication-title: J Biochem
  doi: 10.1093/jb/mvr090
  contributor:
    fullname: Shirasu
– volume: 138
  year: 2013
  ident: B63
  article-title: Stability of selected volatile breath constituents in Tedlar, Kynar and Flexfilm sampling bags
  publication-title: Analyst
  doi: 10.1039/c2an36193k
  contributor:
    fullname: Mochalski
– volume: 14
  start-page: 2127
  year: 2022
  ident: B37
  article-title: Urinary volatile organic compound testing in fast-track patients with suspected colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Cancers
  doi: 10.3390/cancers14092127
  contributor:
    fullname: Boulind
– volume: 26
  year: 2013
  ident: B11
  article-title: Clinical application of volatile organic compound analysis for detecting infectious diseases
  publication-title: Clin Microbiol Rev
  doi: 10.1128/CMR.00020-13
  contributor:
    fullname: Sethi
– volume: 26
  start-page: 550
  year: 2021
  ident: B7
  article-title: Discriminant profiles of volatile compounds in the alveolar air of patients with squamous cell lung cancer, lung adenocarcinoma or colon cancer
  publication-title: Molecules
  doi: 10.3390/molecules26030550
  contributor:
    fullname: Politi
– volume: 21
  start-page: 5440
  year: 2021
  ident: B47
  article-title: Non-invasive detection and staging of colorectal cancer using a portable electronic nose
  publication-title: Sensors
  doi: 10.3390/s21165440
  contributor:
    fullname: Tyagi
– volume: 262
  year: 2015
  ident: B29
  article-title: Effects of curative colorectal cancer surgery on exhaled volatile organic compounds and potential implications in clinical follow-up
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001471
  contributor:
    fullname: Altomare
– volume: 9
  start-page: 047110
  year: 2015
  ident: B62
  article-title: Comparison of sampling bags for the analysis of volatile organic compounds in breath
  publication-title: J Breath Res
  doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/9/4/047110
  contributor:
    fullname: Ghimenti
– volume: 9
  start-page: 027101
  year: 2015
  ident: B17
  article-title: Exhaled breath analysis in suspected cases of non-small-cell lung cancer: a cross-sectional study
  publication-title: J Breath Res
  doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/9/2/027101
  contributor:
    fullname: Corradi
– volume: 58
  year: 2005
  ident: B57
  article-title: The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed
  publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016
  contributor:
    fullname: Deeks
– volume: 166
  year: 2015
  ident: B19
  article-title: Exhaled breath volatile biomarker analysis for thyroid cancer
  publication-title: Trans Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2015.01.005
  contributor:
    fullname: Guo
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1471
  year: 2020
  ident: B55
  article-title: Clinical validation results of an innovative non-invasive device for colorectal cancer preventive screening through fecal exhalation analysis
  publication-title: Cancers
  doi: 10.3390/cancers12061471
  contributor:
    fullname: Zonta
– volume: 29
  year: 2023
  ident: B70
  article-title: Exhaled breath analysis in interstitial lung disease
  publication-title: Curr Opin pulmonary Med
  doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000978
  contributor:
    fullname: van der Sar
– volume: 67
  year: 2015
  ident: B53
  article-title: Development and application of a new electronic nose instrument for the detection of colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Biosensors Bioelectronics
  doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.10.044
  contributor:
    fullname: Westenbrink
– volume: 19
  year: 2010
  ident: B20
  article-title: The screening of volatile markers for hepatocellular carcinoma
  publication-title: Cancer epidemiology Biomarkers Prev
  doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0302
  contributor:
    fullname: Qin
– volume: 22
  year: 2016
  ident: B65
  article-title: Diagnosing gastrointestinal illnesses using fecal headspace volatile organic compounds
  publication-title: World J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i4.1639
  contributor:
    fullname: Chan
– volume: 68
  year: 2019
  ident: B6
  article-title: Participation and yield of a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme in China
  publication-title: Gut
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317124
  contributor:
    fullname: Chen
– volume: 18
  year: 1994
  ident: B21
  article-title: A brief history of electronic noses
  publication-title: Sensors Actuators B: Chem
  doi: 10.1016/0925-4005(94)87085-3
  contributor:
    fullname: Gardner
– volume: 54
  start-page: 14
  year: 2021
  ident: B61
  article-title: Systematic review with meta-analysis: volatile organic compound analysis to improve faecal immunochemical testing in the detection of colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Alimentary Pharmacol Ther
  doi: 10.1111/apt.16405
  contributor:
    fullname: Chandrapalan
– volume: 71
  year: 2021
  ident: B1
  article-title: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
  publication-title: CA: Cancer J Clin
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
  contributor:
    fullname: Sung
– volume: 186
  start-page: 69
  year: 2023
  ident: B60
  article-title: Urinary volatile organic compounds for colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer (Oxford England: 1990)
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.002
  contributor:
    fullname: van Liere
– volume: 46
  year: 2020
  ident: B51
  article-title: Feasibility of volatile organic compound in breath analysis in the follow-up of colorectal cancer: A pilot study
  publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.07.028
  contributor:
    fullname: Steenhuis
– volume: 30
  year: 2012
  ident: B49
  article-title: On-line breath analysis of volatile organic compounds as a method for colorectal cancer detection
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.1570
  contributor:
    fullname: Zambrana Tevar
– volume: 22
  start-page: 246
  year: 2021
  ident: B24
  article-title: The smell of lung disease: a review of the current status of electronic nose technology
  publication-title: Respir Res
  doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01835-4
  contributor:
    fullname: van Keulen
– volume: 274
  year: 2017
  ident: B52
  article-title: Feasibility of electronic nose technology for discriminating between head and neck, bladder, and colon carcinomas
  publication-title: Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
  doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4320-y
  contributor:
    fullname: van de Goor
– volume: 9
  year: 2014
  ident: B32
  article-title: Detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) by urinary volatile organic compound analysis
  publication-title: PloS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108750
  contributor:
    fullname: Arasaradnam
– volume: 6
  start-page: 4
  year: 2016
  ident: B64
  article-title: Variation in gas and volatile compound emissions from human urine as it ages, measured by an electronic nose
  publication-title: Biosensors
  doi: 10.3390/bios6010004
  contributor:
    fullname: Esfahani
– volume: 77
  year: 2017
  ident: B46
  article-title: Abstract 5303: FAIMS technology in urinary volatile organic compound analysis to detect colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Cancer Res
  doi: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5303
  contributor:
    fullname: Psutka
– volume: 51
  year: 2019
  ident: B25
  article-title: Volatile organic compounds in breath can serve as a non-invasive diagnostic biomarker for the detection of advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Alimentary Pharmacol Ther
  doi: 10.1111/apt.15622
  contributor:
    fullname: van Keulen
– volume: 65
  year: 2016
  ident: B54
  article-title: Detection of colorectal cancer from urinary volatile organic compounds using a new chromatograph/electronic-nose instrument – wolf system
  publication-title: Gut
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312388.361
  contributor:
    fullname: Westenbrink
– volume: 19
  year: 2022
  ident: B3
  article-title: Current and future colorectal cancer screening strategies
  publication-title: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol
  doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00612-y
  contributor:
    fullname: Shaukat
– volume: 4
  year: 2020
  ident: B30
  article-title: Chemical signature of colorectal cancer: case–control study for profiling the breath print
  publication-title: BJS Open
  doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50354
  contributor:
    fullname: Altomare
– volume: 136
  year: 2015
  ident: B14
  article-title: Assessment of ovarian cancer conditions from exhaled breath
  publication-title: Int J Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.29166
  contributor:
    fullname: Amal
– volume: 339
  start-page: b2700
  year: 2009
  ident: B27
  article-title: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
  publication-title: BMJ (Clinical Res ed)
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700
  contributor:
    fullname: Liberati
– volume: 134
  year: 2014
  ident: B26
  article-title: Electronic nose can discriminate colorectal carcinoma and advanced adenomas by fecal volatile biomarker analysis: proof of principle study
  publication-title: Int J Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.28446
  contributor:
    fullname: de Meij
– volume: 10
  year: 2015
  ident: B33
  article-title: Use of the analysis of the volatile faecal metabolome in screening for colorectal cancer
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130301
  contributor:
    fullname: Batty
– volume: 269
  year: 2019
  ident: B43
  article-title: Breath volatile organic compound profiling of colorectal cancer using selected ion flow-tube mass spectrometry
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002539
  contributor:
    fullname: Markar
– volume: 20
  start-page: 405
  year: 2016
  ident: B50
  article-title: The use of the PEN3 e-nose in the screening of colorectal cancer and polyps
  publication-title: Techniques Coloproctology
  doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1457-z
  contributor:
    fullname: Altomare
– volume: 14
  start-page: 026009
  year: 2020
  ident: B12
  article-title: Investigation of sweat VOC profiles in assessment of cancer biomarkers using HS-GC-MS
  publication-title: J Breath Res
  doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/ab5b3c
  contributor:
    fullname: Monedeiro
– volume: 114
  year: 2016
  ident: B68
  article-title: Metabolomics by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry: combined targeted and untargeted profiling
  publication-title: Curr Protoc Mol Biol
  doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb3004s114
  contributor:
    fullname: Fiehn
– volume: 155
  year: 2011
  ident: B56
  article-title: QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
  publication-title: Ann Internal Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
  contributor:
    fullname: Whiting
– volume: 5
  start-page: e182815
  year: 2019
  ident: B59
  article-title: Accuracy and methodologic challenges of volatile organic compound-based exhaled breath tests for cancer diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: JAMA Oncol
  doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2815
  contributor:
    fullname: Hanna
– volume: 13
  start-page: 026006
  year: 2019
  ident: B66
  article-title: Associations of diet and lifestyle factors with common volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath of average-risk individuals
  publication-title: J Breath Res
  doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/aaf3dc
  contributor:
    fullname: Krilaviciute
– volume: 23
  year: 2019
  ident: B45
  article-title: Colorectal cancer and adenoma screening using urinary volatile organic compound (VOC) detection: early results from a single-centre bowel screening population (UK BCSP)
  publication-title: Techniques Coloproctology
  doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-01963-6
  contributor:
    fullname: Mozdiak
– volume: 170
  year: 2019
  ident: B4
  article-title: Performance characteristics of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer and advanced adenomatous polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Ann Internal Med
  doi: 10.7326/M18-2390
  contributor:
    fullname: Imperiale
– volume: 5
  year: 2022
  ident: B22
  article-title: Diagnostic performance of electronic noses in cancer diagnoses using exhaled breath: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: JAMA network Open
  doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.19372
  contributor:
    fullname: Scheepers
– volume: 542
  year: 2023
  ident: B31
  article-title: A novel non-invasive colorectal cancer diagnostic method: Volatile organic compounds as biomarkers
  publication-title: Clinica Chimica Acta
  doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2023.117273
  contributor:
    fullname: Alustiza
– volume: 6
  year: 2015
  ident: B16
  article-title: Differentiation between genetic mutations of breast cancer by breath volatolomics
  publication-title: Oncotarget
  doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.v6i42
  contributor:
    fullname: Barash
– volume: 22
  year: 2020
  ident: B36
  article-title: Early detection and follow-up of colorectal neoplasia based on faecal volatile organic compounds
  publication-title: Colorectal Dis
  doi: 10.1111/codi.15009
  contributor:
    fullname: Bosch
– volume: 148
  year: 2015
  ident: B41
  article-title: Nanoarray sensor technology-based volatile marker tests to detect colorectal cancer and colonic adenomas
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(15)30059-7
  contributor:
    fullname: Leja
– volume: 394
  year: 2019
  ident: B2
  article-title: Colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32319-0
  contributor:
    fullname: Dekker
– volume: 11
  start-page: 016015
  year: 2017
  ident: B18
  article-title: Exhaled breath and oral cavity VOCs as potential biomarkers in oral cancer patients
  publication-title: J Breath Res
  doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/aa5e76
  contributor:
    fullname: Bouza
– volume: 20
  year: 2018
  ident: B48
  article-title: Risk stratification of symptomatic patients suspected of colorectal cancer using faecal and urinary markers
  publication-title: Colorectal Dis
  doi: 10.1111/codi.14431
  contributor:
    fullname: Widlak
– volume: 2
  year: 2018
  ident: B40
  article-title: Detection of gas components as a novel diagnostic method for colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Ann Gastroenterological Surg
  doi: 10.1002/ags3.12056
  contributor:
    fullname: Ishibe
– volume: 10
  start-page: 84
  year: 2020
  ident: B69
  article-title: Electronic nose as a novel method for diagnosing cancer: A systematic review
  publication-title: Biosensors
  doi: 10.3390/bios10080084
  contributor:
    fullname: Baldini
– volume: 12
  year: 2014
  ident: B13
  article-title: The scent of colorectal cancer: detection by volatile organic compound analysis
  publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
  doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.05.005
  contributor:
    fullname: de Boer
– volume: 100
  year: 2013
  ident: B28
  article-title: Exhaled volatile organic compounds identify patients with colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.8942
  contributor:
    fullname: Altomare
– volume: 13
  year: 2022
  ident: B38
  article-title: Detecting colorectal adenomas and cancer using volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath: A proof-of-principle study to improve screening
  publication-title: Clin Trans Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000518
  contributor:
    fullname: Cheng
– volume: 18
  year: 2014
  ident: B39
  article-title: Detection of colorectal polyps by exhaled VOCs. Preliminary data
  publication-title: Techniques Coloproctology
  doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-1096-6
  contributor:
    fullname: Depalma
– volume: 21
  year: 2019
  ident: B44
  article-title: Urinary volatile organic compounds and faecal microbiome profiles in colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Colorectal Dis
  doi: 10.1111/codi.14739
  contributor:
    fullname: McFarlane
– volume: 49
  year: 2019
  ident: B35
  article-title: Volatile organic compounds emitted from faeces as a biomarker for colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Alimentary Pharmacol Ther
  doi: 10.1111/apt.15140
  contributor:
    fullname: Bond
– volume: 38
  year: 2020
  ident: B5
  article-title: Motives for non-adherence to colonoscopy advice after a positive colorectal cancer screening test result: a qualitative study
  publication-title: Scandinavian J primary Health Care
  doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1844391
  contributor:
    fullname: Bertels
– volume: 21
  year: 2015
  ident: B67
  article-title: Exhaled molecular fingerprinting in diagnosis and monitoring: validating volatile promises
  publication-title: Trends Mol Med
  doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2015.08.001
  contributor:
    fullname: Boots
– volume: 21
  start-page: 9416
  year: 2020
  ident: B23
  article-title: Potential of the electronic nose for the detection of respiratory diseases with and without infection
  publication-title: Int J Mol Sci
  doi: 10.3390/ijms21249416
  contributor:
    fullname: Licht
– volume: 103
  year: 2010
  ident: B15
  article-title: Detection of lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers from exhaled breath using a single array of nanosensors
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605810
  contributor:
    fullname: Peng
– volume: 138
  year: 2016
  ident: B58
  article-title: Breath testing as potential colorectal cancer screening tool
  publication-title: Int J Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.29701
  contributor:
    fullname: Amal
– volume: 15
  year: 2014
  ident: B10
  article-title: Blood volatile compounds as biomarkers for colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Cancer Biol Ther
  doi: 10.4161/cbt.26723
  contributor:
    fullname: Wang
– volume: 142
  start-page: S528
  year: 2012
  ident: B42
  article-title: Colorectal cancer screening by breath analysis: A specific pattern of volatile organic compounts (VOCs) can discriminate between patients and healthy controls
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(12)62029-0
  contributor:
    fullname: Lena
– volume: 62
  year: 2020
  ident: B34
  article-title: Identification of salivary volatile organic compounds as potential markers of stomach and colorectal cancer: A pilot study
  publication-title: J Oral Biosci
  doi: 10.1016/j.job.2020.05.002
  contributor:
    fullname: Bel'skaya
SSID ssj0000650103
Score 2.4007573
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet The detection of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) could provide a potential diagnostic modality for the early detection and surveillance of colorectal...
Introduction The detection of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) could provide a potential diagnostic modality for the early detection and surveillance of...
IntroductionThe detection of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) could provide a potential diagnostic modality for the early detection and surveillance of...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
crossref
pubmed
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1397259
SubjectTerms colorectal cancer
diagnosis
E-nose
electronic nose
Oncology
VOCs
volatile organic compounds
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LbxQxDI5QDxUXRCmPpYBSiRPS0Nk8Jgk3ClQVUjlRqbfIycQCCWar7vbH8G-xJ7PdXYTEhVs0WXki2xvbY_uzEK8dQ4YkaxuV5rYxiNAER6ve9h6twdwhf--4-NKdX5rPV_Zqa9QX14RVeODKuJNOKdKRAKBVayC0yaFDjQqRPPVkaptvG7aCqXoHWx5gUNOYFIWFE1wMjFiozFv2eRRjk24ZohGv_29O5p-1klvG5-yheDB5jfJ9Pe2BuFeGR2L_YsqLH4pfH2vFHG3L600rgFygpOuHmP-D1mPXZZZcRM6zlJYSJkASWvRyMw9HEqGylERE9oVzDGTdJINb8-VIp8hM-uadBLmBgZa1BWak9LOsoFnTfiwuzz59_XDeTEMXmqyNXzUlW8iZ-N3mhNm2xZXcY4vsCqIFMD0Yb7TzLQYu6jS9Ms51SGYeUlZWPxF7w2Ioz4TsUsgFupQ4yCuowbeuKAUImEIpbiberCUQryu2RqSYhMUVWVyRxRUncc3EKcvo7ocMiz0-IO7FSVniv5RlJo7XEo70N-LcCAxlcbuMFDlpY8m9ms_E0yrxu1dp7-fOB9rxO7qwc5bdneH7txGqmywJQ6iZ5__j9EfiPnOEaxfm-oXYW93clpfkEq3Sq1H7fwPreA7k
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Diagnostic performance of volatile organic compounds analysis and electronic noses for detecting colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38817891
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3063457411
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11138104
https://doaj.org/article/6229639aa3204a90b7f7f3f2ff996b48
Volume 14
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9swDBbaHoZdhr2XPQoN2GmAE1sPS95t69YVAzLssAK5CZIsYgUaJ2jSH7N_O1K2m2TYaRdDsGxaEGmKFKmPjL0zBBkStC5EqHShAHzRGGy1urWgFcQaaL9j_r2-uFTfFnpxxOrxLExO2o_hatpdL6fd1a-cW7lextmYJzb7MT-j8ugW_YjZMTtGCd3z0Xv9q6l4QR_CRA-smcGqI7RCoaZk7wjCJd1bhDJW_78MzL_zJPcWnvOH7MFgMfKP_cgesaPUPWb35kNM_An7_bnPlsNuvt4dA-Ar4Kh6cOKvsZ1PXEZOCeRUR2nD_QBGgo2W72rhcCSUNhyJ8DZRfAFXNk7A1qQYcRSRSN984J7vIKB5f_wlU1qmrS9G2k_Z5fmXn2cXxVBwoYhS2W2RovYxNt6XMUDUZTIptlACmYGgvVetV1ZJY0toKKFTtUIZUwMu8T5EoeUzdtKtuvSC8To0Mfk6BHLwEkhvS5OE8OAhNCmZCXs_csCte1wNh_4IscsRuxyxyw3smrBPxKO7BwkSO9_A2XODYLhaCFQmOHgpSuWbMhgwIEEAoEsXlJ2wtyOHHf5CFBfxXVrdbhx6TVJpNK2qCXvec_zuU9LaytgGe-yBLByM5bAHpTbDdI9S-vL_X33F7tM8ULZCJV-zk-3NbXqDRtA2nObNA7x-XVSnWf7_AFtHEFc
link.rule.ids 230,315,730,783,787,867,888,2109,27936,27937,53804,53806
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LbxMxELZKkaAX3tDwNBInpE02Xnvt5QaFKkBTcWhFb5bt9YiKZhM1mwv_hH_LzD6apOICNytOJl77sz2z_vwNY280SYZ4pRLhxyqRAC4pNJZKVRpQEkIO9L5jepxPTuWXM3W2w_L-LkxD2g_-fFhdzIbV-Y-GW7mYhVHPExt9mx5QenSDccToBruJEzaVG1F6uwIrSl_QHmJiDFaMYF6RXqGQQ_J4BCmTbmxDjVr_31zM60zJja3n8C773je6ZZz8HK5qPwy_ruk5_vtT3WN3Om-Uv2_r77OdWD1gt6bdeftD9vtjy8TDar5YXzHgc-C4rOGgXmC5uc0ZOJHTKUfTkrtO6AQLJV_n2eFoKC45GuFlpLML3DU5iWbTooutCGT68h13fC0vzdurNY2lWaxd0tt-xE4PP50cTJIumUMSMmnqJAblQiicS4OHoNKoYyghBXIxQTknSyeNzLRJoSCyqCyF1DoHdB-cD0Jlj9luNa_iPuO5L0J0ufcUPEbInEl1FMKBA1_EqAfsbT-2dtFqdliMdQgIloBgCQi2A8KAfaDRv_oiyW03H2Dv2W54bC4ELlTY-Eyk0hWp16AhAwGA4aKXZsBe99ixOD3pzMVVcb5aWozIMqnQbRsP2JMWS1d_lRkz1qbAGrOFsq22bNcgdhoJ8B4rT___p6_Y7cnJ9MgefT7--oztUZ8QK2KcPWe79eUqvkBnq_Yvm5n1B6V4MIs
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3JbtswECXaFAh6SffEXVmgpwJaTJEi1Vub1EgXBzk0QIAeBJLioEFj2YjlS_-kf9sZLbEd9JQbIcojWnwkZ8THN4y90yQZ4pSKhBurSALYqNBYqlRlQEnwOdD3julJfnwmv56r855VuexplbV3F3F9OYvri18tt3Ix88nAE0tOp4eUHt1gHJEsKkjusns4aNN8I1LvZmFFKQy6jUyMw4oE5jVpFgoZk9cjSJ10YylqFfv_52beZEtuLD-TB-zn0PCOdfI7XjUu9n9uaDre7p89ZHu9V8o_dvc8YndC_ZjtTvt99yfs71HHyMNqvlgfNeBz4Di9YedeYrk91ek5kdQpV9OS217wBAsVX-fb4WgoLDka4VWgPQxcPTmJZ9Pki63wZPrqA7d8LTPNuyM2raVZaGw02H7KziaffxweR31Sh8hn0jRR8Mp6X1ibegdepUEHX0EK5GqCslZWVhqZaZNCQaRRWQmpdQ7oRljnhcqesZ16XocDxnNX-GBz5yiIDJBZk-oghAULrghBj9j7oX_LRafdUWLMQ2AoCQwlgaHswTBinwgB1zeS7HZ7Ad9e2XdRmQuBExY2PhOptEXqNGjIQABg2OikGbG3A35KHKa092LrMF8tS4zMMqnQfRuP2H6Hp-tHZcaMtSmwxmwhbast2zWIn1YKfMDL89v_9A3bPT2alN-_nHx7we7TKyFyxDh7yXaaq1V4hT5X4163g-sf7VYzCw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic+performance+of+volatile+organic+compounds+analysis+and+electronic+noses+for+detecting+colorectal+cancer%3A+a+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Frontiers+in+oncology&rft.au=Wang%2C+Qiaoling&rft.au=Fang%2C+Yu&rft.au=Tan%2C+Shiyan&rft.au=Li%2C+Zhuohong&rft.date=2024-05-13&rft.issn=2234-943X&rft.eissn=2234-943X&rft.volume=14&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389%2Ffonc.2024.1397259&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3389_fonc_2024_1397259
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2234-943X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2234-943X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2234-943X&client=summon