Effect of Auricular Acupuncture on Propofol Induction Dose: Could Vagus Nerve and Parasympathetic Stimulation Replace Intravenous Co-Induction Agents?
Auricular acupuncture, through a combination of several points, can produce sedative and analgesic effects. The aim of this study was to compare the induction dose of propofol required to obtain a loss of response to verbal commands, with and without a preoperative combination of auricular points. T...
Saved in:
Published in | Medical acupuncture Vol. 31; no. 2; pp. 103 - 108 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
01.04.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1933-6586 1933-6594 |
DOI | 10.1089/acu.2018.1327 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Auricular acupuncture, through a combination of several points, can produce sedative and analgesic effects. The aim of this study was to compare the induction dose of propofol required to obtain a loss of response to verbal commands, with and without a preoperative combination of auricular points.
This study involved American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients, ages 18- 65, of either sex, having elective ambulatory surgery (digestive or gynecologic) under general anesthesia. The subjects were allocated to 2 groups: (1) patients treated by auricular acupuncture (group AA), compared with (2) patients not treated by auricular acupuncture (group NA). Propofol injection was initiated in each group, 10 mg, every 5 seconds, in order for the anesthetist to determine the minimum dose until there was a loss of response to verbal commands (the clinical hypnotic endpoint). At this point, the main outcome-the dose of propofol given-was noted.
There were 32 patients in this study (16 in each group). Age, height, weight, and body mass index were similar in the groups (
≥ 0.05). The required induction propofol dose was 17.7% lower in group AA than in group NA-a statistically significant difference (
≤ 0.05). The mean induction dose indexed to weight was 2.18 mg/kg (range: 1.53-3.13 mg/kg) in group NA and 1.79 mg/kg (range: 1.12-2.11 mg/kg) in group AA. There were no complications.
Auricular acupuncture is a method for stimulating the vagus nerve and parasympathetic nervous system. Preoperative auricular acupuncture enabled reductions of induction doses of propofol for general anesthesia without any clinically important side-effects. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objective:
Auricular acupuncture, through a combination of several points, can produce sedative and analgesic effects. The aim of this study was to compare the induction dose of propofol required to obtain a loss of response to verbal commands, with and without a preoperative combination of auricular points.
Materials and Methods:
This study involved American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients, ages 18– 65, of either sex, having elective ambulatory surgery (digestive or gynecologic) under general anesthesia. The subjects were allocated to 2 groups: (1) patients treated by auricular acupuncture (group AA), compared with (2) patients not treated by auricular acupuncture (group NA). Propofol injection was initiated in each group, 10 mg, every 5 seconds, in order for the anesthetist to determine the minimum dose until there was a loss of response to verbal commands (the clinical hypnotic endpoint). At this point, the main outcome—the dose of propofol given—was noted.
Results:
There were 32 patients in this study (16 in each group). Age, height, weight, and body mass index were similar in the groups (
P
≥ 0.05). The required induction propofol dose was 17.7% lower in group AA than in group NA—a statistically significant difference (
P
≤ 0.05). The mean induction dose indexed to weight was 2.18 mg/kg (range: 1.53–3.13 mg/kg) in group NA and 1.79 mg/kg (range: 1.12–2.11 mg/kg) in group AA. There were no complications.
Conclusions:
Auricular acupuncture is a method for stimulating the vagus nerve and parasympathetic nervous system. Preoperative auricular acupuncture enabled reductions of induction doses of propofol for general anesthesia without any clinically important side-effects. Objective: Auricular acupuncture, through a combination of several points, can produce sedative and analgesic effects. The aim of this study was to compare the induction dose of propofol required to obtain a loss of response to verbal commands, with and without a preoperative combination of auricular points. Materials and Methods: This study involved American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients, ages 18- 65, of either sex, having elective ambulatory surgery (digestive or gynecologic) under general anesthesia. The subjects were allocated to 2 groups: (1) patients treated by auricular acupuncture (group AA), compared with (2) patients not treated by auricular acupuncture (group NA). Propofol injection was initiated in each group, 10 mg, every 5 seconds, in order for the anesthetist to determine the minimum dose until there was a loss of response to verbal commands (the clinical hypnotic endpoint). At this point, the main outcome-the dose of propofol given-was noted. Results: There were 32 patients in this study (16 in each group). Age, height, weight, and body mass index were similar in the groups (P ≥ 0.05). The required induction propofol dose was 17.7% lower in group AA than in group NA-a statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.05). The mean induction dose indexed to weight was 2.18 mg/kg (range: 1.53-3.13 mg/kg) in group NA and 1.79 mg/kg (range: 1.12-2.11 mg/kg) in group AA. There were no complications. Conclusions: Auricular acupuncture is a method for stimulating the vagus nerve and parasympathetic nervous system. Preoperative auricular acupuncture enabled reductions of induction doses of propofol for general anesthesia without any clinically important side-effects.Objective: Auricular acupuncture, through a combination of several points, can produce sedative and analgesic effects. The aim of this study was to compare the induction dose of propofol required to obtain a loss of response to verbal commands, with and without a preoperative combination of auricular points. Materials and Methods: This study involved American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients, ages 18- 65, of either sex, having elective ambulatory surgery (digestive or gynecologic) under general anesthesia. The subjects were allocated to 2 groups: (1) patients treated by auricular acupuncture (group AA), compared with (2) patients not treated by auricular acupuncture (group NA). Propofol injection was initiated in each group, 10 mg, every 5 seconds, in order for the anesthetist to determine the minimum dose until there was a loss of response to verbal commands (the clinical hypnotic endpoint). At this point, the main outcome-the dose of propofol given-was noted. Results: There were 32 patients in this study (16 in each group). Age, height, weight, and body mass index were similar in the groups (P ≥ 0.05). The required induction propofol dose was 17.7% lower in group AA than in group NA-a statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.05). The mean induction dose indexed to weight was 2.18 mg/kg (range: 1.53-3.13 mg/kg) in group NA and 1.79 mg/kg (range: 1.12-2.11 mg/kg) in group AA. There were no complications. Conclusions: Auricular acupuncture is a method for stimulating the vagus nerve and parasympathetic nervous system. Preoperative auricular acupuncture enabled reductions of induction doses of propofol for general anesthesia without any clinically important side-effects. Auricular acupuncture, through a combination of several points, can produce sedative and analgesic effects. The aim of this study was to compare the induction dose of propofol required to obtain a loss of response to verbal commands, with and without a preoperative combination of auricular points. This study involved American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II patients, ages 18- 65, of either sex, having elective ambulatory surgery (digestive or gynecologic) under general anesthesia. The subjects were allocated to 2 groups: (1) patients treated by auricular acupuncture (group AA), compared with (2) patients not treated by auricular acupuncture (group NA). Propofol injection was initiated in each group, 10 mg, every 5 seconds, in order for the anesthetist to determine the minimum dose until there was a loss of response to verbal commands (the clinical hypnotic endpoint). At this point, the main outcome-the dose of propofol given-was noted. There were 32 patients in this study (16 in each group). Age, height, weight, and body mass index were similar in the groups ( ≥ 0.05). The required induction propofol dose was 17.7% lower in group AA than in group NA-a statistically significant difference ( ≤ 0.05). The mean induction dose indexed to weight was 2.18 mg/kg (range: 1.53-3.13 mg/kg) in group NA and 1.79 mg/kg (range: 1.12-2.11 mg/kg) in group AA. There were no complications. Auricular acupuncture is a method for stimulating the vagus nerve and parasympathetic nervous system. Preoperative auricular acupuncture enabled reductions of induction doses of propofol for general anesthesia without any clinically important side-effects. |
Author | Fanara, Benoît Lambiel, Silvia |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Benoît surname: Fanara fullname: Fanara, Benoît organization: Anesthesiology Department, Mont Blanc Regional Hospital, Sallanches-Chamonix, France., Acupuncture Department, Clinic Dr. Benoît Fanara, Annecy-le-Vieux, Annecy, France – sequence: 2 givenname: Silvia surname: Lambiel fullname: Lambiel, Silvia organization: Ear-Nose-and-Throat Unit, Departement des Neurosciences Cliniques, Geneva University Hospital, Genève, Switzerland |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31031876$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkUtv1DAUhS1URB-wZIu8ZJPBj8RxWIBGQ4FKFVRQsbUc-2YalNjBj5H6R_i9ePriIVa27HO-c-1zjA6cd4DQc0pWlMjulTZ5xQiVK8pZ-wgd0Y7zSjRdffCwl-IQHcf4nZCmIa14gg45JZzKVhyhn6fDACZhP-B1DqPJkw54bfKSnUk5APYOXwS_-MFP-MzZbNJYjt75CK_xxufJ4m96myP-BGEHWDuLL3TQ8XpedLqCNBr8NY1zwd74vsAyaQOFlILegfPFufHVb_B6Cy7Ft0_R40FPEZ7drSfo8v3p5eZjdf75w9lmfV4ZXstUWTIwJltZ94IMuhadpY2xpBGt4KJvLZhOgGG8t7TvequJldZK3chBMyM0P0FvbrFL7mewBvZjTWoJ46zDtfJ6VH_fuPFKbf1OiVrWvGEF8PIOEPyPDDGpeYwGpkk7KG9TjFHRtpQRUqQv_sx6CLnvogj4rcAEH2OAQZkx3XxbiR4nRYnaN65K42rfuNo3XlzVP6578P_1vwDkp7He |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000028364 crossref_primary_10_1089_acu_2020_29151_vlf |
Cites_doi | 10.1097/00000542-200202000-00014 10.1136/aim.2009.000570 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01452 10.1097/00000542-199503000-00005 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02832.x 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.2.121 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90756-X 10.1038/sj.npp.1301082 10.1007/978-3-642-73757-2 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31828f5efa 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1986.tb13271.x 10.1093/bja/86.4.523 10.1097/00000539-200111000-00024 10.1016/S0165-1838(99)00090-9 10.1212/WNL.59.6_suppl_4.S3 10.1097/00000542-200505000-00024 10.1093/bja/aeu001 10.1007/s003810050021 10.1177/0310057X9101900110 10.1093/bja/67.5.539 10.1093/bja/67.5.618 10.1155/2013/945063 10.1093/bja/aen146 10.1097/00000542-198908000-00015 10.1213/00000539-199912000-00003 10.1093/bja/aev227 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05632.x 10.1097/00000542-199906000-00004 10.1016/j.brs.2018.09.013 10.1002/ca.1089 10.1089/acm.2012.1022 10.1089/acu.2015.1161 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright 2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2019 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright 2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2019 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1089/acu.2018.1327 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1933-6594 |
EndPage | 108 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC6484352 31031876 10_1089_acu_2018_1327 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29M 34G 39C 4.4 53G 5GY AAYXX ABBKN ABJNI ACGFS ADBBV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL BNQNF CAG CITATION COF CS3 EBS EJD IAO IER IHR IM4 INH INR ITC MV1 NQHIM O9- P6G RML RPM TR2 UE5 NPM 7X8 5PM SCNPE |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-d0f228784b60fa469d15cd0567636b7dec96ec23bd1b9bda0d8dd8a58fa2c6a3 |
ISSN | 1933-6586 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:13:50 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 19:12:46 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 23:02:16 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:59:42 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:38:06 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | vagus nerve stimulation parasympathetic auricular acupuncture propofol general anesthesia co-induction |
Language | English |
License | https://www.liebertpub.com/nv/resources-tools/text-and-data-mining-policy/121 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c348t-d0f228784b60fa469d15cd0567636b7dec96ec23bd1b9bda0d8dd8a58fa2c6a3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 31031876 |
PQID | 2216771200 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6484352 proquest_miscellaneous_2216771200 pubmed_primary_31031876 crossref_citationtrail_10_1089_acu_2018_1327 crossref_primary_10_1089_acu_2018_1327 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-04-00 2019-Apr-01 20190401 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2019 text: 2019-04-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: 140 Huguenot Street, 3rd FloorNew Rochelle, NY 10801USA |
PublicationTitle | Medical acupuncture |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Med Acupunct |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
Publisher_xml | – name: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
References | B20 Bouevitch V (B21) 2003; 14 B22 B23 B24 B25 Volf N (B18) 2016 B26 B27 B28 B29 Reston J. (B7) 1971 Nogier P (B17) 1985 B30 B31 B10 B32 B11 B33 B12 B34 B13 B14 B36 B15 B37 B16 B38 B19 B1 B2 B3 Maranets I (B35) 1999; 89 B4 B5 B6 B9 |
References_xml | – ident: B13 doi: 10.1097/00000542-200202000-00014 – start-page: 6 year: 1971 ident: B7 publication-title: New York Times – ident: B15 doi: 10.1136/aim.2009.000570 – ident: B32 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01452 – ident: B20 doi: 10.1097/00000542-199503000-00005 – ident: B23 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02832.x – ident: B36 doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.2.121 – ident: B25 doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90756-X – ident: B31 doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301082 – ident: B22 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-73757-2 – ident: B11 doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31828f5efa – ident: B3 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1986.tb13271.x – ident: B4 doi: 10.1093/bja/86.4.523 – ident: B16 doi: 10.1097/00000539-200111000-00024 – volume-title: The Man in the Ear year: 1985 ident: B17 – ident: B27 doi: 10.1016/S0165-1838(99)00090-9 – ident: B29 doi: 10.1212/WNL.59.6_suppl_4.S3 – ident: B9 doi: 10.1097/00000542-200505000-00024 – ident: B12 doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu001 – ident: B30 doi: 10.1007/s003810050021 – ident: B34 doi: 10.1177/0310057X9101900110 – ident: B5 doi: 10.1093/bja/67.5.539 – ident: B2 doi: 10.1093/bja/67.5.618 – ident: B37 doi: 10.1155/2013/945063 – ident: B14 doi: 10.1093/bja/aen146 – volume: 14 start-page: 14 year: 2003 ident: B21 publication-title: Web Journal of Acupuncture – ident: B1 doi: 10.1097/00000542-198908000-00015 – volume: 89 start-page: 1346 issue: 6 year: 1999 ident: B35 publication-title: Anesth Analg doi: 10.1213/00000539-199912000-00003 – ident: B10 doi: 10.1093/bja/aev227 – ident: B24 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05632.x – ident: B6 doi: 10.1097/00000542-199906000-00004 – volume-title: Mysteries of the Ear year: 2016 ident: B18 – ident: B33 doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.09.013 – ident: B26 doi: 10.1002/ca.1089 – ident: B28 doi: 10.1089/acm.2012.1022 – ident: B38 doi: 10.1089/acu.2015.1161 – ident: B19 |
SSID | ssj0055076 |
Score | 2.1185133 |
Snippet | Auricular acupuncture, through a combination of several points, can produce sedative and analgesic effects. The aim of this study was to compare the induction... Objective: Auricular acupuncture, through a combination of several points, can produce sedative and analgesic effects. The aim of this study was to compare the... Objective: Auricular acupuncture, through a combination of several points, can produce sedative and analgesic effects. The aim of this study was to compare the... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 103 |
SubjectTerms | Original |
Title | Effect of Auricular Acupuncture on Propofol Induction Dose: Could Vagus Nerve and Parasympathetic Stimulation Replace Intravenous Co-Induction Agents? |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31031876 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2216771200 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6484352 |
Volume | 31 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9swFBahg9KXsfuyGxqMvXTufFEseS8jhI4ymlFYNvpmJMtuDY0TsqTQ_pD9n_2znSPJjpJusPXFBEWRYp_PR0fSp-8Q8iYrE865FkHKIhkwlqSB4vA-SpalZSkF52YrZvwlPfrGPp8OTnu9Xx5rabVUB8X1H8-V3MaqUAZ2xVOy_2HZrlEogM9gX7iCheH6TzZ20sMYTK7MQp5EwvtqDmOV2RgAy55gFoRqhoIa2grFQsxsD6SPMLv1_nd5tkJft7h0JwfkQv64mmKmYjzfCNFoPXUpvjBax1V3XEbErEVG3XU0C9ZND88ML2OTLNjuBcn1P-tQIxu5sMmfoTWzaX_Y8XCO5VTVlkTwtb64rKW_QhFlHrHFsJSQ_jdsmv3julTuIFLr_OYd99_zwVmSBBAYOYVsv8zmQ24dtxs-am_-bL1wFCbegB4Z4YibY0UoUGoV7h0JfuIApuXcrweGmE8NcDAVWyT4lmK3iQFOxqOUCQg5IQq4E8NMJW4XjGwwgGpxqSU22HtyMq_Q9_uNnvfIbtvNZoR0Y9qzzd71wqHJPXLXzWPo0ILyPumVzQOyO3ZMjYfkp8UmnVW0wyb1sElnDW2xSTsAUcTmB2qQSQ0yqUEmBWTSLWRSD5nUIZN6yKQ-MqlF5sdHZPLpcDI6ClwOkKBImFgGOqximNQLptKwkizNdDQoNETtMC6miuuyAJ9SxInSkcqUlqEWWgs5EJWMi1Qmj8lOM2vKp4TqDMarokp0qQesUpWMBGOZlIMoESFTVZ-8ax97Xjh9fEzTcpEbnobIcjBYjgbL0WB98rarPrfCMH-r-Lq1YQ6uG_fjZFPCY8jjOEo5j8Cj9ckTa9OuqRYMfcI3rN1VQFn4zW-a-tzIwztAPrv1L5-TvfVr_ILsLBer8iWE3kv1yoD7N2rK4HM |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+Auricular+Acupuncture+on+Propofol+Induction+Dose%3A+Could+Vagus+Nerve+and+Parasympathetic+Stimulation+Replace+Intravenous+Co-Induction+Agents%3F&rft.jtitle=Medical+acupuncture&rft.au=Fanara%2C+Beno%C3%AEt&rft.au=Lambiel%2C+Silvia&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.pub=Mary+Ann+Liebert%2C+Inc.%2C+publishers&rft.issn=1933-6586&rft.eissn=1933-6594&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=108&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089%2Facu.2018.1327&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31031876&rft.externalDocID=PMC6484352 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1933-6586&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1933-6586&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1933-6586&client=summon |