Association between plasminogen activator inhibitor‑1 (PAI-1) 4G/5G polymorphism and circulating PAI-1 level in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis A meta-analysis
Objective This study systemically reviewed the evidence regarding the association between plasminogen activator inhibitor‑1 ( PAI‑1 ) 4G/5G polymorphism and susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematous (SLE)/lupus nephritis (LN) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the relationship between circulating...
Saved in:
Published in | Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie Vol. 79; no. 3; pp. 312 - 318 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Heidelberg
Springer Medizin
01.04.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective
This study systemically reviewed the evidence regarding the association between plasminogen activator inhibitor‑1 (
PAI‑1
)
4G/5G
polymorphism and susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematous (SLE)/lupus nephritis (LN) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the relationship between circulating PAI‑1 levels and SLE/LN and RA.
Methods
We conducted a meta-analysis on the association between the
PAI‑1 4G/5G
polymorphism and SLE/LN or RA risk and serum/plasma PAI‑1 levels in patients with SLE/LN and RA and healthy controls.
Results
Nine articles including 657 patients with SLE and 668 controls and 567 patients with RA and 772 controls were included. No association was revealed between SLE and
PAI‑1 4G
allele in all study subjects (odds ratio [OR] = 0.944, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.808–1.102,
p
= 0.463). Ethnicity-based stratification showed no association between the
PAI‑1 4G
allele and SLE among Europeans and Asians. No association was detected between LN and RA and the
PAI‑1 4G
allele (OR = 0.886, 95% CI = 0.713–1.102,
p
= 0.278; OR = 0.8736, 95% CI = 0.747–1.020,
p
= 0.088, respectively) or between SLE/LN and RA and the
PAI‑1 4G/5G
polymorphism using the recessive and dominant models and homozygote contrast. The circulating PAI‑1 level was significantly higher in the SLE group than in the control group (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.337, 95% CI = 0.057–0.619,
p
= 0.019). However, serum/plasma PAI‑1 level showed no significant difference between RA and control group (SMD = 0.333, 95% CI = −0.6989–1.35,
p
= 0.527).
Conclusions
There was no association between the
PAI‑1 4G/5G
polymorphism and SLE/LN and RA development and significantly higher levels of circulating PAI‑1 were observed in patients with SLE but not in those with RA. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0340-1855 1435-1250 1435-1250 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00393-019-00689-y |