Predicting Human Operator’s Decisions Based on Prospect Theory
Abstract The aim of this work is to predict human operator’s (HO) decisions in a specific operational context, such as a cooperative human-robot mission, by approximating his/her utility function based on prospect theory (PT). To this aim, a within-subject experiment was designed in which the HO has...
Saved in:
Published in | Interacting with computers Vol. 32; no. 3; pp. 221 - 232 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford University Press
01.05.2020
Oxford University Press (OUP) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0953-5438 1873-7951 |
DOI | 10.1093/iwcomp/iwaa016 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Abstract
The aim of this work is to predict human operator’s (HO) decisions in a specific operational context, such as a cooperative human-robot mission, by approximating his/her utility function based on prospect theory (PT). To this aim, a within-subject experiment was designed in which the HO has to decide with limited time and incomplete information. This experiment also involved a framing effect paradigm, a typical cognitive bias causing people to react differently depending on the context. Such an experiment allowed to acquire data concerning the HO’s decisions in two different mission scenarios: search and rescue and Mars rock sampling. The framing was manipulated (e.g. positive vs. negative) and the probability of the outcomes causing people to react differently depending on the context. Statistical results observed for this experiment supported the hypothesis that the way the problem was presented (positively or negatively framed) and the emotional commitment affected the HO’s decisions. Thus, based on the collected data, the present work is willed to propose: (i) a formal approximation of the HO’s utility function founded on the prospect theory and (ii) a model used to predict the HO’s decisions based on the economics approach of multi-dimensional consumption bundle and PT. The obtained results, in terms of utility function fit and prediction accuracy, are promising and show that similar modeling and prediction method should be taken into account when an intelligent cybernetic system drives human–robot interaction. The advantage of predicting the HO’s decision, in this operational context, is to anticipate his/her decision, given the way a question is framed to the HO. Such a predictor lays the foundation for the development of a decision-making system capable of choosing how to present the information to the operator while expecting to align his/her decision with the given operational guideline. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The aim of this work is to predict human operator’s (HO) decisions in a specific operational context, such as a cooperative human-robot mission, by approximating his/her utility function based on prospect theory (PT). To this aim, a within-subject experiment was designed in which the HO has to decide with limited time and incomplete information. This experiment also involved a framing effect paradigm, a typical cognitive bias causing people to react differently depending on the context. Such an experiment allowed to acquire data concerning the HO’s decisions in two different mission scenarios: search and rescue and Mars rock sampling. The framing was manipulated (e.g. positive vs. negative) and the probability of the outcomes causing people to react differently depending on the context. Statistical results observed for this experiment supported the hypothesis that the way the problem was presented (positively or negatively framed) and the emotional commitment affected the HO’s decisions. Thus, based on the collected data, the present work is willed to propose: (i) a formal approximation of the HO’s utility function founded on the prospect theory and (ii) a model used to predict the HO’s decisions based on the economics approach of multi-dimensional consumption bundle and PT. The obtained results, in terms of utility function fit and prediction accuracy, are promising and show that similar modeling and prediction method should be taken into account when an intelligent cybernetic system drives human–robot interaction. The advantage of predicting the HO’s decision, in this operational context, is to anticipate his/her decision, given the way a question is framed to the HO. Such a predictor lays the foundation for the development of a decision-making system capable of choosing how to present the information to the operator while expecting to align his/her decision with the given operational guideline. Abstract The aim of this work is to predict human operator’s (HO) decisions in a specific operational context, such as a cooperative human-robot mission, by approximating his/her utility function based on prospect theory (PT). To this aim, a within-subject experiment was designed in which the HO has to decide with limited time and incomplete information. This experiment also involved a framing effect paradigm, a typical cognitive bias causing people to react differently depending on the context. Such an experiment allowed to acquire data concerning the HO’s decisions in two different mission scenarios: search and rescue and Mars rock sampling. The framing was manipulated (e.g. positive vs. negative) and the probability of the outcomes causing people to react differently depending on the context. Statistical results observed for this experiment supported the hypothesis that the way the problem was presented (positively or negatively framed) and the emotional commitment affected the HO’s decisions. Thus, based on the collected data, the present work is willed to propose: (i) a formal approximation of the HO’s utility function founded on the prospect theory and (ii) a model used to predict the HO’s decisions based on the economics approach of multi-dimensional consumption bundle and PT. The obtained results, in terms of utility function fit and prediction accuracy, are promising and show that similar modeling and prediction method should be taken into account when an intelligent cybernetic system drives human–robot interaction. The advantage of predicting the HO’s decision, in this operational context, is to anticipate his/her decision, given the way a question is framed to the HO. Such a predictor lays the foundation for the development of a decision-making system capable of choosing how to present the information to the operator while expecting to align his/her decision with the given operational guideline. The aim of this work is to predict human operator's decisions in a specific operational context, such as a cooperative human-robots mission, by approximating her utility function based on Prospect Theory. To this aim, a within-subject experiment was designed in which the human operator has to decide with limited time and incomplete information. This experiment also involved a framing effect paradigm, a typical cognitive bias causing people to react differently depending on the context. Such an experiment allowed to acquire data concerning the human operator's decisions in two different mission scenarios: search and rescue and Mars rock sampling. The framing was manipulated (e.g. positive vs. negative) and the probability of the outcomes causing people to react differently depending on the context. Statistical results observed for this experiment supported the hypothesis that the way the problem was presented (positively or negatively framed) and the emotional commitment affected the human operator's decisions. Thus, based on the collected data, the present work is willed to propose: (i) a formal approximation of the human operator's utility function founded on the Prospect Theory; and (ii) a model used to predict the human operator's decisions based on the economics approach of multi-dimensional consumption bundle and Prospect Theory. The obtained results, in terms of utility function fit and prediction accuracy, are promising and show that similar modeling and prediction method should be taken into account when an intelligent cybernetic system drives human-robots interaction. The advantage of predicting the human operator's decision, in this operational context, is to anticipate her decision, given the way a question is framed to the human operator. Such a predictor lays the foundation for the development of a decision-making system capable of choosing how to present the information to the operator while expecting to align her decision with the given operational guideline. |
Author | de Souza, Paulo E U Chanel, Caroline P C Mailliez, Melody Dehais, Frédéric |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Paulo E U surname: de Souza fullname: de Souza, Paulo E U organization: ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse 10, Av Edouard Belin 31400 Toulouse, France – sequence: 2 givenname: Caroline P C surname: Chanel fullname: Chanel, Caroline P C email: caroline.chanel@isae-supaero.fr organization: ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse 10, Av Edouard Belin 31400 Toulouse, France – sequence: 3 givenname: Melody surname: Mailliez fullname: Mailliez, Melody organization: ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse 10, Av Edouard Belin 31400 Toulouse, France – sequence: 4 givenname: Frédéric surname: Dehais fullname: Dehais, Frédéric organization: ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse 10, Av Edouard Belin 31400 Toulouse, France |
BackLink | https://hal.science/hal-02923113$$DView record in HAL |
BookMark | eNqFkL1OwzAUhS1UJNrCypyVIcWO4zreKOUnSJXaoczWjX-oURtHdgrqxmvwejwJqVoWJMR0pKvz3XvuGaBe7WuD0CXBI4IFvXbvym-aTgAwGZ-gPik4TblgpIf6WDCaspwWZ2gQ4yvGmPMi76ObRTDaqdbVL0m53UCdzBsToPXh6-MzJndGueh8HZNbiEYnvk4WwcfGqDZZrowPu3N0amEdzcVRh-j54X45LdPZ_PFpOpmliua8TU2lC601L6yGscAZsyTPOIOKZwqMEnac44LbnFhWaQaEKyAgLK1MxXRlCB2iq8PeFaxlE9wGwk56cLKczOR-hjORUULo296bH7yqyxqDsVK5FtrujzaAW0uC5b4xeWhMHhvrsNEv7OfOn8Axk982_3m_AXd2g9A |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10846_022_01642_z crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2021_692878 |
Cites_doi | 10.1017/CBO9780511779329 10.1109/TCYB.2016.2638498 10.1007/s10111-011-0188-1 10.1037/a0026788 10.1006/obhd.1998.2804 10.1109/SMC.2016.7844521 10.1007/BF00122574 10.1080/026999300402763 10.32614/CRAN.package.groupdata2 10.1145/1529282.1529542 10.1109/SMC.2015.246 10.1038/s41562-018-0372-x 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.09.004 10.1007/978-3-319-73888-8_33 10.1016/j.cogsys.2016.07.007 10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_51 10.1109/SSRR.2011.6106744 10.1257/jep.27.1.173 10.1109/SMC.2015.174 10.1177/0278364916688255 10.1109/ICECENG.2011.6057781 10.3758/s13423-014-0688-0 10.2307/1914185 10.1080/135467897394329 10.1023/A:1022291921717 10.18637/jss.v028.i05 10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460793 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.014 10.1109/THMS.2015.2480801 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 10.1080/13669877.2016.1200654 10.1017/S0140525X00003447 10.1109/TKDE.2009.191 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.006 10.1126/science.7455683 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Computer Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2020 Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The British Computer Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2020 – notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 1XC VOOES |
DOI | 10.1093/iwcomp/iwaa016 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Computer Science |
EISSN | 1873-7951 |
EndPage | 232 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_HAL_hal_02923113v1 10_1093_iwcomp_iwaa016 10.1093/iwcomp/iwaa016 |
GroupedDBID | --K .2P .DC .I3 0R~ 1B1 1TH 29J 4.4 48X 5GY 5VS 5WD 71M 77K AABZA AACTN AACZT AAEDT AAFXQ AAIJN AAJKP AAJQQ AALRI AAMOW AAMVS AAMZS AAOGV AAPGJ AAPQZ AAPXW AAQFI AAQXK AARHZ AAUAY AAUOS AAUQX AAVAP AAWDT AAXUO ABAZT ABBGM ABDFA ABDTM ABEJV ABEUO ABGNP ABICN ABIME ABIVO ABIXL ABJHR ABJNI ABKEB ABMAC ABNGD ABNHQ ABNKS ABPIB ABPQP ABPTD ABQLI ABSMQ ABVGC ABWST ABWVN ABXVK ABXVV ABZBJ ABZEO ACDXO ACFRR ACGFS ACHQT ACMCV ACOZV ACRPL ACUFI ACUKT ACUTJ ACUTO ACUXJ ACVCV ACVJI ACYTK ACZBC ADAES ADBBV ADBKU ADEYI ADGZP ADHKW ADHZD ADIPN ADJOM ADLMC ADLOL ADMLS ADMTO ADMUD ADNBA ADNMO ADOCK ADQBN ADQIT ADRDM ADRTK ADVEK ADYLA ADYVW ADZXQ AECKG AEGPL AEJER AEJOX AEKER AEKKA AEKSI AEMDU AENEX AENZO AEPUE AETBJ AEWNT AFFQV AFFZL AFHLB AFIQY AFIYH AFOFC AFVIK AFVSF AFYAG AGFCL AGINJ AGKRT AGMDO AGQXC AGSYK AHHHB AHMMS AHXPO AICVH AIDGQ AIRXX AITUG AJDVS AJECE AJEEA AJEUX AJNCP ALJLX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALTZX ALUQC ALXQX AMMGX ANAKG ANDVN ANFBD ANNUL APIBT APJGH AQDSO AQKUS ASAOO ASPBG ASPYK ATDFG ATGXG AVNTJ AVWKF AVWTO AXUDD AYLYT AZFZN AZVOD BAYMD BCRHZ BEFXN BEYMZ BFFAM BGNUA BHONS BHZBG BKEBE BMSTW BOXDG BPEOZ BQUQU BTQHN BTRTY BVRKM BZKNY BZYEK CDBKE CS3 CXTWN DAKXR DDUBX DFGAJ DILTD DU5 D~K EBS ECIRT EE~ EIHJH EJD ELUNK EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 ETYVG EYXSX F5P F9B FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FLIZI FLUFQ FNPLU FOEOM FOTVD FQBLK G-Q GAOTZ GAUVT GJXCC H13 H5~ HAR HLZ HVGLF HW0 HZ~ IHE J1W J21 JAVBF JXSIZ KBUDW KOP KSI KSN LG9 LOXHT M41 MBLQV MBTAY MBUXU MJWOD ML0 MXSPP N9A NGC NMDNZ NOMLY NOYVH NQ- NU- NVLIB O0~ O9- OAIJC OAWHX OBFPC OCL OCZFY ODMLO OJQWA OJZSN OKKKP OPAEJ OWPYF OXVUA OZT O~Y P2P PAFKI PB- PEELM PLIXB Q1. Q5Y R2- RIG ROL ROX ROZ RPZ RUSNO RW1 RXO SBC SDG SDP SES SSZ TCN THA TJH TJJ TJP TJX TMA TSS UHS WUQ YADRA YAJVU YAYTL YKOAZ YXANX ~S- ~SN AAYXX ABVLG ADYJX AGORE AHGBF AJBYB CITATION 1XC AGQPQ VOOES |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-ebd8ddd78fda69025f14275ab72caec9f64087f41f5bd5a17ca1a9f3beb5dbe13 |
ISSN | 0953-5438 |
IngestDate | Fri May 09 12:15:05 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:59:29 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:03:49 EDT 2025 Wed Apr 02 07:04:44 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | prospect theory model-based predictor design framing effect human–computer interaction (HCI) cognitive bias human–robot(s) interaction (HRI) Prospect theory Human-computer interaction (HCI)- Human-robot(s) interaction (HRI) Model-based predictor design Framing effect Cognitive bias |
Language | English |
License | This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c347t-ebd8ddd78fda69025f14275ab72caec9f64087f41f5bd5a17ca1a9f3beb5dbe13 |
OpenAccessLink | https://hal.science/hal-02923113 |
PageCount | 12 |
ParticipantIDs | hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02923113v1 crossref_citationtrail_10_1093_iwcomp_iwaa016 crossref_primary_10_1093_iwcomp_iwaa016 oup_primary_10_1093_iwcomp_iwaa016 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-05-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2020 text: 2020-05-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | Interacting with computers |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press Oxford University Press (OUP) |
Publisher_xml | – name: Oxford University Press – name: Oxford University Press (OUP) |
References | Nadendla (2021070704135722300_ref31) 2016 Kahneman (2021070704135722300_ref21) 1979; 47 Tversky (2021070704135722300_ref47) 1992; 5 Suarez (2021070704135722300_ref42) 2011 Guo (2021070704135722300_ref17) 2018 Robinette (2021070704135722300_ref36) 2016 Souza (2021070704135722300_ref52) 2016 Jiang (2021070704135722300_ref18) 2015 Pan (2021070704135722300_ref34) 2010; 22 Todd (2021070704135722300_ref45) 2000; 23 Klein (2021070704135722300_ref23) 1997; 3 Wakker (2021070704135722300_ref49) 2010 Kappes (2021070704135722300_ref22) 2018; 2 Olsen (2021070704135722300_ref32) 2017 Lerner (2021070704135722300_ref27) 2000; 14 Matarić (2021070704135722300_ref29) 2003; 14 Agresti (2021070704135722300_ref1) 2011 Zhang (2021070704135722300_ref51) 2016 Dehais (2021070704135722300_ref15) 2015 Timotheou (2021070704135722300_ref44) 2009 Xue (2021070704135722300_ref50) 2011 Bevacqua (2021070704135722300_ref8) 2015 Tversky (2021070704135722300_ref46) 1981; 211 Bates (2021070704135722300_ref6) 2015; 67 Kőszegi (2021070704135722300_ref25) 2006; 121 Biswas (2021070704135722300_ref9) 2017; 43 Ren (2021070704135722300_ref35) 2016; 47 Barnes (2021070704135722300_ref4) 2015 Strimmer (2021070704135722300_ref41) 2015 Osmont (2021070704135722300_ref33) 2015; 22 Kuhn (2021070704135722300_ref26) 2008; 28 Steiger (2021070704135722300_ref40) 2018 Kahneman (2021070704135722300_ref20) 1979 Dehais (2021070704135722300_ref13) 2005 Barberis (2021070704135722300_ref3) 2013; 27 Schurr (2021070704135722300_ref38) 2009 de Winter (2021070704135722300_ref11) 2014; 16 Suhonen (2021070704135722300_ref43) 2007 Bago (2021070704135722300_ref2) 2017; 158 Stark (2021070704135722300_ref39) 2017; 20 Kahneman (2021070704135722300_ref19) 2011 Von Neumann (2021070704135722300_ref48) 2007 Cassotti (2021070704135722300_ref10) 2012; 12 Dehais (2021070704135722300_ref14) 2019; 100 Kolling (2021070704135722300_ref24) 2016; 46 Levin (2021070704135722300_ref28) 1998; 76 Dehais (2021070704135722300_ref12) 2012; 43 Murphy (2021070704135722300_ref30) 2008 Baron (2021070704135722300_ref5) 2007 Belloni (2021070704135722300_ref7) 2014 Gombolay (2021070704135722300_ref16) 2017; 36 Schmitt (2021070704135722300_ref37) 2018 |
References_xml | – volume-title: AAAI 2005 fall symposium “from reactive to anticipatory cognitive embodied systems” year: 2005 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref13 article-title: Towards an anticipatory agent to help pilots – volume-title: Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity year: 2010 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref49 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511779329 – volume-title: Thinking and Deciding year: 2007 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref5 – start-page: 315 volume-title: 25th int. conf. automated planning and scheduling (ICAPS) year: 2015 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref8 article-title: Mixed-initiative planning and execution for multiple drones in search and rescue missions – volume: 47 start-page: 2531 year: 2016 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref35 article-title: Hesitant fuzzy thermodynamic method for emergency decision making based on prospect theory publication-title: IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2016.2638498 – volume: 16 start-page: 1 year: 2014 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref11 article-title: Why the Fitts list has persisted throughout the history of function allocation publication-title: Cogn. Tech. Work doi: 10.1007/s10111-011-0188-1 – volume: 12 start-page: 926 year: 2012 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref10 article-title: Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making publication-title: Emotion doi: 10.1037/a0026788 – volume: 76 start-page: 149 year: 1998 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref28 article-title: All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects publication-title: Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2804 – year: 2018 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref40 article-title: A meta-analytic re-appraisal of the framing effect publication-title: Z. Psychol. – start-page: 1929 volume-title: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Budapest, Hungary, 2016 year: 2016 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref52 article-title: Towards human-robot interaction: {A} framing effect experiment doi: 10.1109/SMC.2016.7844521 – volume: 5 start-page: 297 year: 1992 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref47 article-title: Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty publication-title: J. Risk Uncertain. doi: 10.1007/BF00122574 – volume: 14 start-page: 473 year: 2000 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref27 article-title: Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice publication-title: Cognit. Emot. doi: 10.1080/026999300402763 – year: 2017 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref32 article-title: groupdata2: Creating groups from data doi: 10.32614/CRAN.package.groupdata2 – start-page: 353 volume-title: Proc. 8th int. conf. autonomous agents and multiagent systems year: 2009 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref38 article-title: Improving adjustable autonomy strategies for time-critical domains – volume-title: Thinking, Fast and Slow year: 2011 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref19 – start-page: 1171 volume-title: Proc. 2009 ACM symposium on applied computing year: 2009 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref44 article-title: Autonomous networked robots for the establishment of wireless communication in uncertain emergency response scenarios doi: 10.1145/1529282.1529542 – start-page: 1386 volume-title: 2015 IEEE int. conf. systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC) year: 2015 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref4 article-title: Designing for mixed-initiative interactions between human and autonomous systems in complex environments doi: 10.1109/SMC.2015.246 – volume: 2 start-page: 573 year: 2018 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref22 article-title: Uncertainty about the impact of social decisions increases prosocial behaviour publication-title: Nat. Hum. Behav. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0372-x – start-page: 2525 volume-title: Proc. 33rd annual ACM conf. human factors in computing systems year: 2015 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref15 article-title: Automation surprise in aviation: real-time solutions – start-page: 101 volume-title: 11th ACM/IEEE int. conf. human-robot interaction (HRI) year: 2016 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref36 article-title: Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios – volume: 43 start-page: 588 year: 2012 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref12 article-title: Cognitive conflict in human–automation interactions: A psychophysiological study publication-title: Appl. Ergon. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.09.004 – start-page: 209 volume-title: Int. conf. intelligent human systems integration year: 2018 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref37 article-title: Experimental validation of pilot situation awareness enhancement through transparency design of a scalable mixed-initiative mission planner doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-73888-8_33 – volume: 43 start-page: 266 year: 2017 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref9 article-title: The effects of cognitive biases and imperfectness in long-term robot-human interactions: Case studies using five cognitive biases on three robots publication-title: Cogn. Syst. Res. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2016.07.007 – start-page: 1151 volume-title: Springer Handbook of Robotics year: 2008 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref30 article-title: Search and Rescue Robotics doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-30301-5_51 – start-page: 314 volume-title: 2011 IEEE int. symposium on safety, security, and rescue robotics (SSRR) year: 2011 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref42 article-title: A survey of animal foraging for directed, persistent search by rescue robotics doi: 10.1109/SSRR.2011.6106744 – volume: 121 start-page: 1133 year: 2006 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref25 article-title: A model of reference-dependent preferences publication-title: The Quarterly Journal of Economics – volume: 27 start-page: 173 year: 2013 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref3 article-title: Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: A review and assessment publication-title: J. Econ. Perspect. doi: 10.1257/jep.27.1.173 – start-page: 954 volume-title: 2015 IEEE int. conf. systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC) year: 2015 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref18 article-title: Mixed-initiative human-robot interaction: Definition, taxonomy, and survey doi: 10.1109/SMC.2015.174 – volume: 36 start-page: 597 year: 2017 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref16 article-title: Computational design of mixed-initiative human–robot teaming that considers human factors: Situational awareness, workload, and workflow preferences publication-title: Int. J. Robot. Res. doi: 10.1177/0278364916688255 – start-page: 3792 volume-title: 2011 int. conf. electrical and control engineering (ICECE) year: 2011 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref50 article-title: A review of autonomous robotic search doi: 10.1109/ICECENG.2011.6057781 – volume-title: Normative and Descriptive Theories of Decision Making Under Risk: A Short Review year: 2007 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref43 – volume: 22 start-page: 572 year: 2015 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref33 article-title: Does ambiguity aversion influence the framing effect during decision making? publication-title: Psychon. Bull. Rev. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0688-0 – volume: 47 start-page: 263 year: 1979 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref21 article-title: Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk publication-title: Econometrica doi: 10.2307/1914185 – volume: 3 start-page: 337 year: 1997 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref23 article-title: Developing expertise in decision making publication-title: Think. Reason. doi: 10.1080/135467897394329 – volume: 14 start-page: 255 year: 2003 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref29 article-title: Multi-Robot task allocation in uncertain environments publication-title: Auton. Robot. doi: 10.1023/A:1022291921717 – year: 2015 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref41 article-title: crossval: Generic functions for cross validation – start-page: 766 volume-title: 54th annual Allerton conf. communication, control, and computing (Allerton) year: 2016 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref31 article-title: Towards the design of prospect-theory based human decision rules for hypothesis testing – volume: 28 start-page: 1 year: 2008 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref26 article-title: Building predictive models in r using the caret package publication-title: J. Stat. Softw. doi: 10.18637/jss.v028.i05 – start-page: 6395 volume-title: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, QLD, 2018 year: 2018 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref17 article-title: Human-in-the-Loop Mixed-Initiative Control Under Temporal Tasks doi: 10.1109/ICRA.2018.8460793 – start-page: 538 volume-title: 8th int. conf. intelligent human-machine systems and cybernetics (IHMSC) year: 2016 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref51 article-title: Comparison of decision-making mechanism between emotion behavior selection and prospect theory – volume: 158 start-page: 90 year: 2017 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref2 article-title: Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory publication-title: Cognition doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.014 – volume: 46 start-page: 9 year: 2016 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref24 article-title: Human interaction with robot swarms: A survey publication-title: IEEE T. Hum.-Mach. Syst. doi: 10.1109/THMS.2015.2480801 – volume: 67 start-page: 1 year: 2015 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref6 article-title: Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 publication-title: J. Stat. Softw. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 – start-page: paper 8 volume-title: CEPE 2014 well-being, flourishing, and ICTs year: 2014 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref7 article-title: Towards a framework to deal with ethical conflicts in autonomous agents and multi-agent systems – volume-title: Categorical Data Analysis year: 2011 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref1 – volume: 20 start-page: 1585 year: 2017 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref39 article-title: Understanding the framing effect: Do affective responses to decision options mediate the influence of frame on choice? publication-title: J. Risk Res. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2016.1200654 – start-page: 263 year: 1979 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref20 article-title: Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk publication-title: Econometrica doi: 10.2307/1914185 – volume: 23 start-page: 727 year: 2000 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref45 article-title: Précis of simple heuristics that make us smart publication-title: Behav. Brain Sci. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00003447 – volume: 22 start-page: 1345 year: 2010 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref34 article-title: A survey on transfer learning publication-title: IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2009.191 – volume-title: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior year: 2007 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref48 – volume: 100 start-page: 252 year: 2019 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref14 article-title: Momentary lapse of control: A cognitive continuum approach to understanding and mitigating perseveration in human error publication-title: Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.006 – volume: 211 start-page: 453 year: 1981 ident: 2021070704135722300_ref46 article-title: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.7455683 |
SSID | ssj0007784 |
Score | 2.2727497 |
Snippet | Abstract
The aim of this work is to predict human operator’s (HO) decisions in a specific operational context, such as a cooperative human-robot mission, by... The aim of this work is to predict human operator’s (HO) decisions in a specific operational context, such as a cooperative human-robot mission, by... The aim of this work is to predict human operator's decisions in a specific operational context, such as a cooperative human-robots mission, by approximating... |
SourceID | hal crossref oup |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 221 |
SubjectTerms | Cognitive science Neuroscience |
Title | Predicting Human Operator’s Decisions Based on Prospect Theory |
URI | https://hal.science/hal-02923113 |
Volume | 32 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBabzaWXvkuTPhCl0INx4ods2bdu82Ap2XYhWcjNSJZMAsEO-2ghp_6EXvv3-ks68sjytt3StBevEdpZVjOM5vHNDCGvI54q04PFz3WufJZJ7gupSr_iIgEZ0iwoTXHy5EM6nrH358n5YPB1DbW0Wsq98mZjXcn_cBXWgK-mSvYfOOuIwgK8A3_hCRyG5614PJ2bNEsLXMZg_Mdr3abNOwhDvgCFgkN0Ft47uLCUSQ5M501bYNkX5jv7tA0QCiRpUek49cGZ3kp7p83qRnSwwsY78mZrIIEa0_4HOA5Ie9M-DmvwHGDytiHrib5qlAvnH-oLgc0Ojm3qXuHH_LJcj0tEQY8CdAFGA7vA3i17GtVrxmOf57bFrNW_fXyzd89RmWLttL2XI9z3m8rHdliXn815tC9CBOGG7tq_3HoOi4hZ-LhACoX9_hbZjsDxiIZke3Q4OTl1tzvn7RRr9-9cI9B4HynsWwo_GTpbFwZma0oo16yXs_vkrnU76Ahl6AEZ6PohudeN9KBWwz8ib3uRoq1I0U6kvn_5tqBOmGgrTLSpaSdMFIXpMZkdH50djH07ZMMvY8aXvpYqU0rxrFIiNTnnKmQRT4TkUSl0mVcpCzJesbBKpEpEyEsRiryKpZaJkjqMn5Bh3dT6KaFgekupGXgYSrMUbEdpuiGKMEsFk1kkdojfnUhR2g70ZhDKVbGZBzvkjdt_jb1X_rjzFRyw22Rapo9HJ4VZCyLjwoTxpxA2wfn_hdLurX_zGbnTi_1zMlzOV_oFGKhL-dLKzA8rgJWu |
linkProvider | EBSCOhost |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting+Human+Operator%E2%80%99s+Decisions+Based+on+Prospect+Theory&rft.jtitle=Interacting+with+computers&rft.au=de+Souza%2C+Paulo+E+U&rft.au=Chanel%2C+Caroline+P+C&rft.au=Mailliez%2C+Melody&rft.au=Dehais%2C+Fr%C3%A9d%C3%A9ric&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.issn=0953-5438&rft.eissn=1873-7951&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=232&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fiwcomp%2Fiwaa016&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1093_iwcomp_iwaa016 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0953-5438&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0953-5438&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0953-5438&client=summon |