Survival Benefit of Induction Chemotherapy with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Followed by Chemoradiation Versus Postoperative Treatment in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Background Gastric cancer remains a prevalent worldwide illness that lacks a definitive cure. Recently, induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation has shown promising results in achieving a significant pathological response in locally advanced gastric cancer and improving survival...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of gastrointestinal cancer Vol. 55; no. 1; pp. 457 - 466 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.03.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1941-6628 1941-6636 1941-6636 |
DOI | 10.1007/s12029-023-00991-8 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background
Gastric cancer remains a prevalent worldwide illness that lacks a definitive cure. Recently, induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation has shown promising results in achieving a significant pathological response in locally advanced gastric cancer and improving survival rates. However, the optimal regimen for this approach continues to be a subject of discussion.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study was conducted on treatment-naïve patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who were referred to Imam Hossain General Hospital in Tehran, Iran, between April 2016 and March 2019. Eligible patients met the criteria of clinical T3-4 or nodal-positive stage, or both, and had non-metastatic resectable tumors. The patients were categorized into two groups: (a) the neoadjuvant group, which received induction chemotherapy (carboplatin AUC 2 and paclitaxel 50 mg/m
2
weekly for 12 cycles) followed by concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiation (radiotherapy 45–50 Gy/1.8 Gy per fraction concurrent with capecitabine 500 mg/m
2
BID and oxaliplatin 40 mg/m
2
weekly), and (b) the adjuvant group, which was treated with standard chemoradiation or chemotherapy regimens. The two groups were compared regarding the 3-year recurrence rate and 3-year overall survival.
Results
A total of 102 patients were included in the study (63.7% male, mean age ± standard deviation 56 ± 13 years). Among these, 45 patients received neoadjuvant treatment, and 57 received adjuvant treatment. The neoadjuvant group had a higher proportion of patients with advanced disease (stage III: 91.1% vs. 57.9%, P = 0.001). In the neoadjuvant group, 20 patients (44.4%) achieved a complete pathologic response, and all underwent curative surgery. The neoadjuvant group exhibited a lower 3-year recurrence rate (13 [28.9%] vs. 33 [57.9%], P = 0.003) and a higher 3-year overall survival rate (36 [80%] vs. 32 [56.1%], P = 0.003).
Conclusions
Patients receiving induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by chemoradiation demonstrated enhanced disease control and survival compared to standard adjuvant regimens. In addition, patients treated with the applied preoperative regimen in this study showed higher pathologic response and overall survival rates than in previous studies. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Gastric cancer remains a prevalent worldwide illness that lacks a definitive cure. Recently, induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation has shown promising results in achieving a significant pathological response in locally advanced gastric cancer and improving survival rates. However, the optimal regimen for this approach continues to be a subject of discussion.
This retrospective cohort study was conducted on treatment-naïve patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who were referred to Imam Hossain General Hospital in Tehran, Iran, between April 2016 and March 2019. Eligible patients met the criteria of clinical T3-4 or nodal-positive stage, or both, and had non-metastatic resectable tumors. The patients were categorized into two groups: (a) the neoadjuvant group, which received induction chemotherapy (carboplatin AUC 2 and paclitaxel 50 mg/m
weekly for 12 cycles) followed by concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiation (radiotherapy 45-50 Gy/1.8 Gy per fraction concurrent with capecitabine 500 mg/m
BID and oxaliplatin 40 mg/m
weekly), and (b) the adjuvant group, which was treated with standard chemoradiation or chemotherapy regimens. The two groups were compared regarding the 3-year recurrence rate and 3-year overall survival.
A total of 102 patients were included in the study (63.7% male, mean age ± standard deviation 56 ± 13 years). Among these, 45 patients received neoadjuvant treatment, and 57 received adjuvant treatment. The neoadjuvant group had a higher proportion of patients with advanced disease (stage III: 91.1% vs. 57.9%, P = 0.001). In the neoadjuvant group, 20 patients (44.4%) achieved a complete pathologic response, and all underwent curative surgery. The neoadjuvant group exhibited a lower 3-year recurrence rate (13 [28.9%] vs. 33 [57.9%], P = 0.003) and a higher 3-year overall survival rate (36 [80%] vs. 32 [56.1%], P = 0.003).
Patients receiving induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by chemoradiation demonstrated enhanced disease control and survival compared to standard adjuvant regimens. In addition, patients treated with the applied preoperative regimen in this study showed higher pathologic response and overall survival rates than in previous studies. Gastric cancer remains a prevalent worldwide illness that lacks a definitive cure. Recently, induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation has shown promising results in achieving a significant pathological response in locally advanced gastric cancer and improving survival rates. However, the optimal regimen for this approach continues to be a subject of discussion.BACKGROUNDGastric cancer remains a prevalent worldwide illness that lacks a definitive cure. Recently, induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation has shown promising results in achieving a significant pathological response in locally advanced gastric cancer and improving survival rates. However, the optimal regimen for this approach continues to be a subject of discussion.This retrospective cohort study was conducted on treatment-naïve patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who were referred to Imam Hossain General Hospital in Tehran, Iran, between April 2016 and March 2019. Eligible patients met the criteria of clinical T3-4 or nodal-positive stage, or both, and had non-metastatic resectable tumors. The patients were categorized into two groups: (a) the neoadjuvant group, which received induction chemotherapy (carboplatin AUC 2 and paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 weekly for 12 cycles) followed by concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiation (radiotherapy 45-50 Gy/1.8 Gy per fraction concurrent with capecitabine 500 mg/m2 BID and oxaliplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly), and (b) the adjuvant group, which was treated with standard chemoradiation or chemotherapy regimens. The two groups were compared regarding the 3-year recurrence rate and 3-year overall survival.METHODSThis retrospective cohort study was conducted on treatment-naïve patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who were referred to Imam Hossain General Hospital in Tehran, Iran, between April 2016 and March 2019. Eligible patients met the criteria of clinical T3-4 or nodal-positive stage, or both, and had non-metastatic resectable tumors. The patients were categorized into two groups: (a) the neoadjuvant group, which received induction chemotherapy (carboplatin AUC 2 and paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 weekly for 12 cycles) followed by concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiation (radiotherapy 45-50 Gy/1.8 Gy per fraction concurrent with capecitabine 500 mg/m2 BID and oxaliplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly), and (b) the adjuvant group, which was treated with standard chemoradiation or chemotherapy regimens. The two groups were compared regarding the 3-year recurrence rate and 3-year overall survival.A total of 102 patients were included in the study (63.7% male, mean age ± standard deviation 56 ± 13 years). Among these, 45 patients received neoadjuvant treatment, and 57 received adjuvant treatment. The neoadjuvant group had a higher proportion of patients with advanced disease (stage III: 91.1% vs. 57.9%, P = 0.001). In the neoadjuvant group, 20 patients (44.4%) achieved a complete pathologic response, and all underwent curative surgery. The neoadjuvant group exhibited a lower 3-year recurrence rate (13 [28.9%] vs. 33 [57.9%], P = 0.003) and a higher 3-year overall survival rate (36 [80%] vs. 32 [56.1%], P = 0.003).RESULTSA total of 102 patients were included in the study (63.7% male, mean age ± standard deviation 56 ± 13 years). Among these, 45 patients received neoadjuvant treatment, and 57 received adjuvant treatment. The neoadjuvant group had a higher proportion of patients with advanced disease (stage III: 91.1% vs. 57.9%, P = 0.001). In the neoadjuvant group, 20 patients (44.4%) achieved a complete pathologic response, and all underwent curative surgery. The neoadjuvant group exhibited a lower 3-year recurrence rate (13 [28.9%] vs. 33 [57.9%], P = 0.003) and a higher 3-year overall survival rate (36 [80%] vs. 32 [56.1%], P = 0.003).Patients receiving induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by chemoradiation demonstrated enhanced disease control and survival compared to standard adjuvant regimens. In addition, patients treated with the applied preoperative regimen in this study showed higher pathologic response and overall survival rates than in previous studies.CONCLUSIONSPatients receiving induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by chemoradiation demonstrated enhanced disease control and survival compared to standard adjuvant regimens. In addition, patients treated with the applied preoperative regimen in this study showed higher pathologic response and overall survival rates than in previous studies. Background Gastric cancer remains a prevalent worldwide illness that lacks a definitive cure. Recently, induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation has shown promising results in achieving a significant pathological response in locally advanced gastric cancer and improving survival rates. However, the optimal regimen for this approach continues to be a subject of discussion. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted on treatment-naïve patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who were referred to Imam Hossain General Hospital in Tehran, Iran, between April 2016 and March 2019. Eligible patients met the criteria of clinical T3-4 or nodal-positive stage, or both, and had non-metastatic resectable tumors. The patients were categorized into two groups: (a) the neoadjuvant group, which received induction chemotherapy (carboplatin AUC 2 and paclitaxel 50 mg/m 2 weekly for 12 cycles) followed by concurrent neoadjuvant chemoradiation (radiotherapy 45–50 Gy/1.8 Gy per fraction concurrent with capecitabine 500 mg/m 2 BID and oxaliplatin 40 mg/m 2 weekly), and (b) the adjuvant group, which was treated with standard chemoradiation or chemotherapy regimens. The two groups were compared regarding the 3-year recurrence rate and 3-year overall survival. Results A total of 102 patients were included in the study (63.7% male, mean age ± standard deviation 56 ± 13 years). Among these, 45 patients received neoadjuvant treatment, and 57 received adjuvant treatment. The neoadjuvant group had a higher proportion of patients with advanced disease (stage III: 91.1% vs. 57.9%, P = 0.001). In the neoadjuvant group, 20 patients (44.4%) achieved a complete pathologic response, and all underwent curative surgery. The neoadjuvant group exhibited a lower 3-year recurrence rate (13 [28.9%] vs. 33 [57.9%], P = 0.003) and a higher 3-year overall survival rate (36 [80%] vs. 32 [56.1%], P = 0.003). Conclusions Patients receiving induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by chemoradiation demonstrated enhanced disease control and survival compared to standard adjuvant regimens. In addition, patients treated with the applied preoperative regimen in this study showed higher pathologic response and overall survival rates than in previous studies. |
Author | Azadeh, Payam Yaghobi Joybari, Ali Gholizadeh pasha, Sahar Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farzad Abiar, Zeinab Alahyari, Sam |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Payam surname: Azadeh fullname: Azadeh, Payam organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences – sequence: 2 givenname: Sahar surname: Gholizadeh pasha fullname: Gholizadeh pasha, Sahar organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences – sequence: 3 givenname: Ali surname: Yaghobi Joybari fullname: Yaghobi Joybari, Ali organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences – sequence: 4 givenname: Zeinab surname: Abiar fullname: Abiar, Zeinab organization: Radiation Oncologist, Imam sajad hospital, Iran university of medical science – sequence: 5 givenname: Sam surname: Alahyari fullname: Alahyari, Sam organization: Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences – sequence: 6 givenname: Farzad surname: Taghizadeh-Hesary fullname: Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farzad email: farzadth89@gmail.com, taghizadeh_hesary.f@iums.ac.ir organization: ENT and Head and Neck Research Center and Department, The Five Senses Health Institute, School of Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Department of Radiation Oncology, Iran University of Medical Sciences |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38010493$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kc1u1DAUhSNURH_gBVggL9kE7DjJxOyGqC2VRqKiha3l2NeMK48dbGdKHpD3wp2ULlh05WvpfOfqnnNaHDnvoCjeEvyBYLz6GEmFK1biipYYM0bK7kVxQlhNyral7dHTXHXHxWmMdxi3dUPIq-KYdpjgmtGT4s_NFPZmLyz6DA60SchrdOXUJJPxDvVb2Pm0hSDGGd2btEXXQlqTxG-wSDiFehEGP1qRjEMX3lp_DwoN8wIGoYw4-PyAEKeIrn1MfsxuyewB3QYQaQcuoQxvvBTWzmit9sLJbHIpYgpG5g35Gz6hNfoGKfg4gjzQvd_6kNBNmtT8uniphY3w5vE9K75fnN_2X8rN18urfr0pJa1XqRxaQplu6yEf38KgZI0H2eBuaFqxwhTjYSAaiNIEKqkpy5lKJStd6043DcP0rHi_-I7B_5ogJr4zUYK1woGfIq86Vq8qggnL0neP0mnYgeJjMDsRZv4v-iyoFoHMR8UA-klCMH_oly_98twvP_TLuwx1_0Eyl_EQcQrC2OdRuqAx73E_IfA7PwWX43qO-gsl9L5y |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_27987 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v30_i8_863 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40487_024_00299_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ctarc_2024_100845 |
Cites_doi | 10.1097/00000421-198212000-00014 10.1016/j.crphar.2021.100047 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32557-1 10.1186/s13045-023-01451-3 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30132-3 10.1186/s12885-018-4770-2 10.1002/prm2.12038 10.1200/jco.2011.36.7136 10.1056/NEJMoa055531 10.3322/caac.21660 10.1200/jco.2011.39.1953 10.3322/caac.21388 10.3390/cancers15164058 10.1159/000506519 10.1245/s10434-017-5830-6 10.1200/jco.2004.01.015 10.1007/s00432-023-04592-7 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.02.003 10.1200/jco.2006.06.4840 10.3390/cancers14123026 10.3390/cancers13184733 10.1093/annonc/mdy102 10.1186/s12885-022-09297-7 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. – notice: 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1007/s12029-023-00991-8 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology |
EISSN | 1941-6636 |
EndPage | 466 |
ExternalDocumentID | 38010493 10_1007_s12029_023_00991_8 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- -5E -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .VR 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 1N0 203 29K 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2LR 2VQ 2~H 30V 4.4 406 408 40D 40E 53G 5GY 5VS 6NX 8TC 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANXM AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACCUX ACDTI ACGFS ACHSB ACHVE ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACSNA ACUDM ACZOJ ADHIR ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFEXP AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHSBF AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AOCGG ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN B-. BDATZ BGNMA CAG COF CS3 CSCUP D-I DDRTE DNIVK DPUIP EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD ESBYG F5P FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GRRUI H13 HF~ HG6 HMJXF HRMNR HZ~ IJ- IKXTQ IWAJR IXD I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JZLTJ KOV LLZTM M4Y MA- N2Q N9A NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O9J OVD P9S PF0 PT4 QOK QOR R89 R9I ROL RSV S16 S1Z S27 S37 S3B SAP SCLPG SHX SISQX SJYHP SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SZ9 SZN T13 TEORI TSG TT1 TUC U2A U9L UG4 UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W48 WK8 YLTOR Z7U Z87 ZMTXR ZOVNA ~A9 ~KM AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ACSTC ADHKG AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AFOHR AGQPQ AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION ABRTQ CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-b6139f64b1046ebdc40bc508b56a70300bb1fe1df1e2cf39991cdc2f4f8f55903 |
IEDL.DBID | U2A |
ISSN | 1941-6628 1941-6636 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 10:53:47 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:01:09 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:12:43 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:12:06 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:40:28 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Recurrence Chemotherapy Adjuvant Treatment Chemoradiation Gastric Cancer Neoadjuvant Treatment Survival |
Language | English |
License | 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c347t-b6139f64b1046ebdc40bc508b56a70300bb1fe1df1e2cf39991cdc2f4f8f55903 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 38010493 |
PQID | 2894721019 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2894721019 pubmed_primary_38010493 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12029_023_00991_8 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s12029_023_00991_8 springer_journals_10_1007_s12029_023_00991_8 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20240300 2024-03-00 2024-Mar 20240301 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 3 year: 2024 text: 20240300 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | New York |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of gastrointestinal cancer |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | J Gastrointest Canc |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Gastrointest Cancer |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | Springer US |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer US |
References | Lee, Lim, Kim (CR5) 2012; 30 Hu, Wang, Xu, Shao, Li (CR3) 2021; 10 Guan, He, Xu (CR2) 2023; 16 CR19 CR18 CR17 Al-Batran, Homann, Pauligk (CR8) 2019; 393 CR16 Smalley, Benedetti, Haller (CR6) 2012; 30 CR14 Sung, Ferlay, Siegel (CR1) 2021; 71 CR13 CR12 CR23 CR11 CR22 CR10 CR20 Sahu, Langeh, Singh, Singh (CR15) 2021; 2 Cunningham, Allum, Stenning (CR4) 2006; 355 Cats, Jansen, van Grieken (CR7) 2018; 19 Oken, Creech, Tormey (CR21) 1982; 5 Slagter, Jansen, van Laarhoven (CR9) 2018; 18 991_CR12 991_CR23 991_CR13 991_CR10 WL Guan (991_CR2) 2023; 16 991_CR11 991_CR22 Q Hu (991_CR3) 2021; 10 K Sahu (991_CR15) 2021; 2 991_CR20 MM Oken (991_CR21) 1982; 5 J Lee (991_CR5) 2012; 30 SE Al-Batran (991_CR8) 2019; 393 AE Slagter (991_CR9) 2018; 18 SR Smalley (991_CR6) 2012; 30 A Cats (991_CR7) 2018; 19 991_CR18 991_CR19 991_CR16 H Sung (991_CR1) 2021; 71 D Cunningham (991_CR4) 2006; 355 991_CR17 991_CR14 |
References_xml | – volume: 5 start-page: 649 issue: 6 year: 1982 end-page: 55 ident: CR21 article-title: Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group publication-title: Am J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1097/00000421-198212000-00014 – ident: CR22 – ident: CR19 – ident: CR18 – volume: 2 start-page: 100047 year: 2021 ident: CR15 article-title: Crosstalk between anticancer Drugs and mitochondrial functions publication-title: Curr Res Pharmacol Drug Discovery doi: 10.1016/j.crphar.2021.100047 – volume: 393 start-page: 1948 issue: 10184 year: 2019 end-page: 57 ident: CR8 article-title: Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32557-1 – ident: CR14 – ident: CR16 – volume: 16 start-page: 57 issue: 1 year: 2023 ident: CR2 article-title: Gastric cancer treatment: recent progress and future perspectives publication-title: J Hematol Oncol doi: 10.1186/s13045-023-01451-3 – volume: 19 start-page: 616 issue: 5 year: 2018 end-page: 28 ident: CR7 article-title: Chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy after Surgery and preoperative chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer (CRITICS): an international, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial publication-title: Lancet Oncol doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30132-3 – ident: CR12 – ident: CR17 – ident: CR13 – volume: 18 start-page: 877 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: CR9 article-title: CRITICS-II: a multicentre randomised phase II trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by Surgery versus neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent chemoradiotherapy followed by Surgery versus neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by Surgery in resectable gastric cancer publication-title: BMC Cancer doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4770-2 – ident: CR10 – ident: CR11 – volume: 10 start-page: 78 issue: 2 year: 2021 end-page: 82 ident: CR3 article-title: Survival outcomes of locally advanced gastric cancer cases with pathological complete response received neoadjuvant chemotherapy publication-title: Precision Med Sci doi: 10.1002/prm2.12038 – volume: 30 start-page: 2327 issue: 19 year: 2012 end-page: 33 ident: CR6 article-title: Updated analysis of SWOG-directed intergroup study 0116: a phase III trial of adjuvant radiochemotherapy versus observation after curative gastric cancer resection publication-title: J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1200/jco.2011.36.7136 – volume: 355 start-page: 11 issue: 1 year: 2006 end-page: 20 ident: CR4 article-title: Perioperative chemotherapy versus Surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055531 – volume: 71 start-page: 209 issue: 3 year: 2021 end-page: 49 ident: CR1 article-title: Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 – ident: CR23 – ident: CR20 – volume: 30 start-page: 268 issue: 3 year: 2012 end-page: 73 ident: CR5 article-title: Phase III trial comparing Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin Versus Capecitabine Plus Cisplatin with Concurrent Capecitabine Radiotherapy in completely resected gastric Cancer with D2 lymph node dissection: the ARTIST trial publication-title: J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1200/jco.2011.39.1953 – ident: 991_CR20 doi: 10.3322/caac.21388 – ident: 991_CR17 doi: 10.3390/cancers15164058 – ident: 991_CR19 doi: 10.1159/000506519 – volume: 71 start-page: 209 issue: 3 year: 2021 ident: 991_CR1 publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 – ident: 991_CR10 doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5830-6 – volume: 30 start-page: 2327 issue: 19 year: 2012 ident: 991_CR6 publication-title: J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1200/jco.2011.36.7136 – ident: 991_CR22 doi: 10.1200/jco.2004.01.015 – ident: 991_CR16 doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04592-7 – volume: 2 start-page: 100047 year: 2021 ident: 991_CR15 publication-title: Curr Res Pharmacol Drug Discovery doi: 10.1016/j.crphar.2021.100047 – volume: 19 start-page: 616 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: 991_CR7 publication-title: Lancet Oncol doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30132-3 – ident: 991_CR13 doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2017.02.003 – volume: 355 start-page: 11 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: 991_CR4 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055531 – ident: 991_CR18 doi: 10.1200/jco.2006.06.4840 – volume: 10 start-page: 78 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 991_CR3 publication-title: Precision Med Sci doi: 10.1002/prm2.12038 – volume: 18 start-page: 877 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 991_CR9 publication-title: BMC Cancer doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4770-2 – volume: 5 start-page: 649 issue: 6 year: 1982 ident: 991_CR21 publication-title: Am J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1097/00000421-198212000-00014 – volume: 393 start-page: 1948 issue: 10184 year: 2019 ident: 991_CR8 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32557-1 – ident: 991_CR11 doi: 10.3390/cancers14123026 – volume: 16 start-page: 57 issue: 1 year: 2023 ident: 991_CR2 publication-title: J Hematol Oncol doi: 10.1186/s13045-023-01451-3 – ident: 991_CR14 doi: 10.3390/cancers13184733 – volume: 30 start-page: 268 issue: 3 year: 2012 ident: 991_CR5 publication-title: J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1200/jco.2011.39.1953 – ident: 991_CR12 doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy102 – ident: 991_CR23 doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09297-7 |
SSID | ssj0064511 |
Score | 2.3678944 |
Snippet | Background
Gastric cancer remains a prevalent worldwide illness that lacks a definitive cure. Recently, induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent... Gastric cancer remains a prevalent worldwide illness that lacks a definitive cure. Recently, induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation has... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 457 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Cancer Research Carboplatin - administration & dosage Carboplatin - therapeutic use Chemoradiotherapy - methods Chemoradiotherapy - mortality Female Gastroenterology Humans Induction Chemotherapy - methods Induction Chemotherapy - mortality Internal Medicine Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods Neoadjuvant Therapy - mortality Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy Neoplasm Staging Oncology Paclitaxel - administration & dosage Paclitaxel - therapeutic use Radiotherapy Retrospective Studies Stomach Neoplasms - mortality Stomach Neoplasms - pathology Stomach Neoplasms - therapy Survival Rate |
Title | Survival Benefit of Induction Chemotherapy with Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Followed by Chemoradiation Versus Postoperative Treatment in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12029-023-00991-8 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38010493 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2894721019 |
Volume | 55 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3da9RAEF-0BfGlaOvHVS0jiC-6kI9NLvEtd_Ra1BbRHtSnsLvZReFMjlwOzR_o_-XMZtMilYJPR47dzcNMZn6_nS_GXqEXTXSiNJ_mUnGhDY15kZInuF5OUxPHjiienaenS_H-Mrn0RWGbMdt9DEk6S31d7BZRqgb6GE6wJuTZXbabEHdHLV5GxWh_U-q45WLJIuRpGmW-VObfZ_ztjm5gzBvxUed2Fg_YnseLUAwCfsjumHqfHRQ1cuUfPbwGl8Hprsb32b0zHyg_YL-_bNEGoBbBDI2Z_d5BY4HGdLgyBqA2Ab70qge6ioVPUlO77l9mBbKuYC5b1awpT66GBapK89NUoPphY0v9DNw5dNu23QBN_G3WZmgiDhdj7jrg5o_kK1c9FD7XAE4kTQrR-AZ8bN9BAZ9N1zZjxSfMm2_ICIDyG_tHbLk4vpifcj-xgetYTDuuEBzkNhWKIsdGVVoESiMEVEkqybQESoXWhJUNTaRtTOBUVzqywmYWqU0QP2Y7dVObpwwSI4XRlTJIqYSI0M5USW5lkGvEnDYwExaOgiu1b2dOUzVW5XUjZhJ2icIunbDLbMLeXO1ZD808bl39ctSHEr85CqTI2jTbTYkkVSBzRnQ8YU8GRbk6L86I4ebxhL0dNaf0ZmFzy8sO_2_5M3Yf_xJDMtxzttO1W_MC0VGnjthusZjNzun35OuH4yP3cfwBhykMSA |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3fb9MwELZgSLAXNDZghQGHhHiBSPnhpAlvoaIUaCcErbQ3y3ZsMalLqjQV5A_k_-LOSTahoUk8RrGdh7vcfef77o6xV-hFYx0r7Y0zqTyuDY15kdKLcb0cJyaKXKC4OE1mK_75LD7ri8K2A9t9SEk6S31V7BYSVQN9jEewJvDS2-wOgoGUiFyrMB_sb0Idt1wumQdekoRpXyrz7zP-dkfXMOa1_KhzO9MDdr_Hi5B3An7AbpnykB3lJcbKFy28BsfgdFfjh-zuok-UH7Hf33doA1CL4D0aM3veQGWBxnS4MgagNgF96VULdBULX6Wmdt2_zBpkWcBE1qraEE-uhCmqSvXTFKDabmNN_QzcOXTbttsCTfytNqZrIg7LgbsOuHlOvnLdQt5zDeCjpEkhGr-Aj_U7yOGbaepqqPiESfUDIwIgfmP7kK2mH5aTmddPbPB0xMeNpxAcZDbhijLHRhWa-0ojBFRxIsm0-EoF1gSFDUyobUTgVBc6tNymFkMbP3rE9sqqNMcMYiO50YUyGFJxHqKdKeLMSj_TiDmtb0YsGAQndN_OnKZqrMVVI2YStkBhCydskY7Ym8s9m66Zx42rXw76IPCfo0SKLE212woMUjlGzoiOR-xxpyiX50UpRbhZNGJvB80RvVnY3vCxJ_-3_AW7N1su5mL-6fTLU7aPr3lHjDthe029M88QKTXqufsx_gCGWwwr |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELagSBUXBC3Q5TlIiAtYzcPJJtzCwlKgrSroSr1ZtmMLpCVZZbOC_ED-FzNO0oKKKnGMYjuHmcx845n5hrHn6EUTk2jDp7nSXBhLY16U4gmuV9PUxrEPFI-O04OF-HiWnP3Rxe-r3ceUZN_TQCxNVbu_Kt3-ReNbRGUb6G84QZyQZ9fZDTTHIen1IipGW5wS-5bPK4uQp2mUDW0z_z7jb9d0CW9eypV6FzS_zW4N2BGKXth32DVb7bDdosK4-XsHL8BXc_pr8h22fTQkzXfZry8btAeoUfAGDZv71kLtgEZ2-JYGIMqAoQ2rA7qWhRNliLr7p12CqkqYqUbXK6qZq2COalP_sCXort_YELeBP4du3jZroOm_9cr2hOJwOtaxA24-JL-57KAY6g7gvaKpIQa_gI_Nayjgs22beuz-hFn9FaMDoFrH7i5bzN-dzg74ML2Bm1hMW64RKOQuFZqyyFaXRgTaIBzUSarIzARah86GpQttZFxMQNWUJnLCZQ7DnCC-x7aqurJ7DBKrhDWlthheCRGhzSmT3KkgN4g_XWAnLBwFJ81AbU4TNpbygpSZhC1R2NILW2YT9vJ8z6on9rhy9bNRHyT-f5RUUZWtN2uJAavAKBqR8oTd7xXl_Lw4o2g3jyfs1ag5cjAR6ys-9uD_lj9l2ydv5_Lww_Gnh-wmvhV9jdwjttU2G_sYQVOrn_j_4jeX2xBn |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survival+Benefit+of+Induction+Chemotherapy+with+Paclitaxel+and+Carboplatin+Followed+by+Chemoradiation+Versus+Postoperative+Treatment+in+Locally+Advanced+Gastric+Cancer%3A+A+Retrospective+Cohort+Study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+gastrointestinal+cancer&rft.au=Azadeh%2C+Payam&rft.au=Gholizadeh+Pasha%2C+Sahar&rft.au=Yaghobi+Joybari%2C+Ali&rft.au=Abiar%2C+Zeinab&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.issn=1941-6636&rft.eissn=1941-6636&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs12029-023-00991-8&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1941-6628&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1941-6628&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1941-6628&client=summon |