Ureteric stenting with magnetic retrieval: an alternative to traditional methods

• Published in: Irish journal of medical science Vol. 189; no. 1; pp. 289 - 293
• Main Authors: O’Kelly, John A., Haroon, Usman M., Rauf, Abdul J., Breen, Kieran J., McGuire, Barry B., Cheema, Ijaz A., McLornan, Liza, Forde, James C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Springer London 01.02.2020
• Subjects: Family Medicine; General Practice; Internal Medicine; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Article; JJ stent; Magnetic stent; Stent symptoms; Flexible cystoscopy; Ureteroscopy; Ureteric stent; Double J stent
• ISSN: 0021-1265; 1863-4362
• DOI: 10.1007/s11845-019-02075-8

Introduction Ureteric stents are frequently placed following endo-urological procedures. These stents cause significant morbidity for patients. Standard ureteric stents are removed by flexible cystoscopy. This procedure can be unpleasant for patients and requires additional resources. A newly designed magnetic stent allows removal in an outpatient setting. The aim of our study is to compare the magnetic stent and standard ureteric stents with regard to morbidity, pain on stent removal and cost-effectiveness. Methods This study was carried out across two sites between September 2016 and July 2017. In site A, a magnetic stent (Urotech, Black-Star®) is removed by magnetic retrieval device. Fifty consecutive patients completed the validated Ureteric Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS) at the time of stent removal. On site B, a soft polyurethane stent (Cook Universa) was removed by flexible cystoscopy. Fifty patients were identified retrospectively and completed questionnaires by post. Cost analysis was also performed. Results One hundred questionnaires were included for analysis. No significant difference in stent morbidity as assessed by the USSQ was shown between both groups. Median duration of stenting was significantly shorter in the magnetic stent group (5.5 versus 21.5 days, p  < 0.001). Mean pain on stent removal was significantly less with magnetic retrieval (2.9 versus 3.9, p  < 0.05). Complication rates were similar in both groups. Cost analysis showed a cost saving of €203 per patient with the magnetic stent group. Conclusion Magnetic stents cause similar morbidity for patients compared with standard stents removed by flexible cystoscopy; they are associated with less pain at removal and are cost saving.