Evaluations of competence to stand trial are evolving amid a national “competency crisis”
Across the United States, court orders for competence to stand trial (CST) evaluations and competence restoration services have been increasing much more rapidly than states can provide these services, prompting what has been called a national “competency crisis.” The challenge in providing timely c...
Saved in:
| Published in | Behavioral sciences & the law Vol. 41; no. 5; pp. 310 - 325 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.09.2023
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Across the United States, court orders for competence to stand trial (CST) evaluations and competence restoration services have been increasing much more rapidly than states can provide these services, prompting what has been called a national “competency crisis.” The challenge in providing timely competence restoration services has, in several jurisdictions, prompted a change in competence evaluations. Evaluators are more often required to address broader clinical issues—such as recommending placement or addressing the urgency of hospitalization—rather than addressing
only
CST. This marks an evolving practice in forensic evaluation, which moves evaluators beyond the very narrow forensic question of competence and into more traditionally clinical recommendations. We describe several state examples of changing practice in order to highlight the initial barriers, and potential benefits, to addressing additional clinical issues in competence evaluations, amid a national competence crisis. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Across the United States, court orders for competence to stand trial (CST) evaluations and competence restoration services have been increasing much more rapidly than states can provide these services, prompting what has been called a national “competency crisis.” The challenge in providing timely competence restoration services has, in several jurisdictions, prompted a change in competence evaluations. Evaluators are more often required to address broader clinical issues—such as recommending placement or addressing the urgency of hospitalization—rather than addressing
only
CST. This marks an evolving practice in forensic evaluation, which moves evaluators beyond the very narrow forensic question of competence and into more traditionally clinical recommendations. We describe several state examples of changing practice in order to highlight the initial barriers, and potential benefits, to addressing additional clinical issues in competence evaluations, amid a national competence crisis. Across the United States, court orders for competence to stand trial (CST) evaluations and competence restoration services have been increasing much more rapidly than states can provide these services, prompting what has been called a national "competency crisis." The challenge in providing timely competence restoration services has, in several jurisdictions, prompted a change in competence evaluations. Evaluators are more often required to address broader clinical issues-such as recommending placement or addressing the urgency of hospitalization-rather than addressing only CST. This marks an evolving practice in forensic evaluation, which moves evaluators beyond the very narrow forensic question of competence and into more traditionally clinical recommendations. We describe several state examples of changing practice in order to highlight the initial barriers, and potential benefits, to addressing additional clinical issues in competence evaluations, amid a national competence crisis.Across the United States, court orders for competence to stand trial (CST) evaluations and competence restoration services have been increasing much more rapidly than states can provide these services, prompting what has been called a national "competency crisis." The challenge in providing timely competence restoration services has, in several jurisdictions, prompted a change in competence evaluations. Evaluators are more often required to address broader clinical issues-such as recommending placement or addressing the urgency of hospitalization-rather than addressing only CST. This marks an evolving practice in forensic evaluation, which moves evaluators beyond the very narrow forensic question of competence and into more traditionally clinical recommendations. We describe several state examples of changing practice in order to highlight the initial barriers, and potential benefits, to addressing additional clinical issues in competence evaluations, amid a national competence crisis. Across the United States, court orders for competence to stand trial (CST) evaluations and competence restoration services have been increasing much more rapidly than states can provide these services, prompting what has been called a national "competency crisis." The challenge in providing timely competence restoration services has, in several jurisdictions, prompted a change in competence evaluations. Evaluators are more often required to address broader clinical issues-such as recommending placement or addressing the urgency of hospitalization-rather than addressing only CST. This marks an evolving practice in forensic evaluation, which moves evaluators beyond the very narrow forensic question of competence and into more traditionally clinical recommendations. We describe several state examples of changing practice in order to highlight the initial barriers, and potential benefits, to addressing additional clinical issues in competence evaluations, amid a national competence crisis. |
| Author | Murrie, Daniel C. Packer, Ira K. Kois, Lauren E. Gowensmith, W. Neil |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Daniel C. surname: Murrie fullname: Murrie, Daniel C. organization: Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA – sequence: 2 givenname: W. Neil surname: Gowensmith fullname: Gowensmith, W. Neil organization: Forensic Institute for Research, Service, and Training University of Denver Denver Colorado USA – sequence: 3 givenname: Lauren E. surname: Kois fullname: Kois, Lauren E. organization: Department of Psychology The University of Alabama Tuscaloosa Alabama USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Ira K. surname: Packer fullname: Packer, Ira K. organization: University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School Worcester Massachusetts USA |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37056195$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNplkc1KxDAUhYMoOv6ATyABN2463rS9SbMUGX9gwI0uJaRtKpG2GZN0wJ0Poi_nk9hx_AFd3cX9zuHec3bJZu96Q8ghgykDSE_L0E5TnsIGmTCQMgEhi00yAZFhksmM75DdEB4BAAuU22QnE4CcSZyQ-9lSt4OO1vWBuoZWrluYaPrK0OhoiLqvafRWt1R7Q83StUvbP1Dd2Zpq2n8Kx-X7y-uP8plW3gYb3l_e9slWo9tgDr7mHrm7mN2eXyXzm8vr87N5UmU5xgSLQsiaY44NlqlBFOOERmcllzUUXLNaGA45cI3MYF3lnJWlNrpGIVKZZXvkZO278O5pMCGqzobKtK3ujRuCSgtgUiCmfESP_6CPbvDjDytqNGMyRzFSR1_UUHamVgtvO-2f1XdwIzBdA5V3IXjTqMrGzzSi17ZVDNSqGTU2o1bN_J74I_j2_Id-AHz9jzw |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_14789949_2024_2344261 crossref_primary_10_1080_14789949_2024_2348021 crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMp2308861 crossref_primary_10_3390_bs15030325 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1037/law0000296 10.1080/24732850.2022.2104146 10.1002/bsl.2287 10.1037/lhb0000003 10.1002/bsl.699 10.1037/a0021713 10.1017/s1092852919001585 10.1037/14461-005 10.1037/law0000210 10.1017/S1092852920000103 10.1037/law0000304 10.1007/978-1-4419-8493-7 10.33696/Psychiatry.1.001 10.1111/lcrp.12100 10.1111/1556‐4029.14669 10.1037/law0000088 10.29158/JAAPL.003893‐20 10.1002/bsl.2501 10.1007/978-3-031-13733-4_8 10.1093/med:psych/9780199941551.001.0001 10.1017/S1092852919001342 10.1037/ser0000512 10.29158/JAAPL.003819‐19 10.29158/JAAPL.003840‐19 10.1002/bsl.2370100303 10.1037/h0093958 10.1093/med-psych/9780190052850.003.0002 10.1080/24732850.2020.1714398 10.1037/law0000306 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113069 10.29158/JAAPL.003772‐18 10.1037/lhb0000398 10.1017/s1092852919001561 10.1176/appi.ps.201900483 10.1002/bsl.2309 10.1017/S1092852919001044 10.1037/law0000190 10.1037/pas0000388 10.1037/lhb0000236 10.29158/JAAPL.003926‐20 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.20 10.1023/A:1005422702678 10.1089/jchc.20.08.0075 10.1037/tps0000114 10.1300/J158v04n01_02 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2023 The Authors. Behavioral Sciences & The Law published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2023 The Authors. Behavioral Sciences & The Law published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. – notice: 2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7QJ K7. 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1002/bsl.2620 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Psychology Law |
| EISSN | 1099-0798 |
| EndPage | 325 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 37056195 10_1002_bsl_2620 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1L6 1OB 1OC 1ZS 23N 31~ 33P 36B 3WU 4.4 4ZD 50Y 50Z 51W 51Y 52M 52O 52Q 52S 52T 52U 52W 53G 5GY 5VS 66C 6PF 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A04 AABNI AAESR AAHHS AAHQN AAMNL AANHP AAONW AAOUF AASGY AAWTL AAXRX AAYCA AAYXX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABIJN ABIVO ABJNI ABPVW ABSOO ABTBU ACAHQ ACBKW ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACIWK ACNCT ACPOU ACRPL ACSCC ACUHS ACXQS ACYXJ ADAJC ADBBV ADEMA ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADUOI ADXAS ADXHL ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AEQDE AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFKFF AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AHBTC AIAGR AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ASTYK ASUFR AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BMXJE BNVMJ BQESF BROTX BRXPI BY8 CITATION CO8 CS3 D-C D-D DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSSH DU5 EAD EAP EBD EBS EJD EKAWT EMB EMK EMOBN EPL EPS ESX EV9 F00 F01 F5P FEDTE G-S G.N G50 GDP GNP GODZA HAOEW HBH HCSNT HGLYW HHY HISYW HVGLF HZ~ IX1 J0M JPC KQQ LATKE LAW LC2 LC4 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M6U M86 MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSSH MSFUL MSSSH MXFUL MXSSH N04 N06 NF~ NNB O66 O9- OHT OIG OVD P2P P2W P2Y P4C PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K RHO RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI UB1 ULE UPT V2E V62 W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHDPE WIB WIH WII WOHZO WQZ WSUWO WXSBR XG1 XV2 YQR Z0I ZGI ZZTAW ~IA ~WP AEUQT AFPWT AIFKG NPM RVT RWI VQA WRC 7QJ AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY K7. 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-58879d6545f5b2e557f5b0fa3b69d086a1d7e60406a51e5dc461bbaead5772933 |
| ISSN | 0735-3936 1099-0798 |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 07:26:39 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:42:26 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:24:31 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:12:56 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:12:40 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 5 |
| Keywords | competence to stand trial competence evaluation competence restoration competency crisis forensic assessment |
| Language | English |
| License | 2023 The Authors. Behavioral Sciences & The Law published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c345t-58879d6545f5b2e557f5b0fa3b69d086a1d7e60406a51e5dc461bbaead5772933 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/bsl.2620 |
| PMID | 37056195 |
| PQID | 2872919457 |
| PQPubID | 49030 |
| PageCount | 16 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2801975526 proquest_journals_2872919457 pubmed_primary_37056195 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_bsl_2620 crossref_primary_10_1002_bsl_2620 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2023-09-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-09-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2023 text: 2023-09-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Bognor Regis |
| PublicationTitle | Behavioral sciences & the law |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Behav Sci Law |
| PublicationYear | 2023 |
| Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| References | e_1_2_11_70_1 e_1_2_11_93_1 e_1_2_11_32_1 e_1_2_11_78_1 e_1_2_11_36_1 e_1_2_11_51_1 e_1_2_11_74_1 e_1_2_11_97_1 e_1_2_11_13_1 e_1_2_11_29_1 e_1_2_11_4_1 e_1_2_11_48_1 Fink J. (e_1_2_11_21_1) 2022 Shafer S. (e_1_2_11_84_1) 2015 Torrey E. F. (e_1_2_11_88_1) 2010 Grisso T. (e_1_2_11_34_1) 2010; 2 e_1_2_11_81_1 Shannon B. D. (e_1_2_11_85_1) 2017; 49 e_1_2_11_20_1 e_1_2_11_66_1 e_1_2_11_47_1 e_1_2_11_24_1 e_1_2_11_43_1 e_1_2_11_17_1 e_1_2_11_50_1 e_1_2_11_92_1 Swaine J. (e_1_2_11_87_1) 2015 e_1_2_11_31_1 e_1_2_11_77_1 e_1_2_11_35_1 e_1_2_11_12_1 e_1_2_11_54_1 e_1_2_11_96_1 e_1_2_11_28_1 e_1_2_11_5_1 e_1_2_11_80_1 Fitch W. L. (e_1_2_11_22_1) 2014 Murrie D. C. (e_1_2_11_67_1) Mossman D. (e_1_2_11_63_1) 2007; 35 e_1_2_11_9_1 e_1_2_11_23_1 e_1_2_11_16_1 e_1_2_11_39_1 e_1_2_11_72_1 e_1_2_11_30_1 Richelson S. (e_1_2_11_79_1) 2021 e_1_2_11_76_1 e_1_2_11_95_1 e_1_2_11_11_1 Tullis P. (e_1_2_11_91_1) 2019 e_1_2_11_6_1 e_1_2_11_27_1 Fuller D. A. (e_1_2_11_25_1) 2016 e_1_2_11_2_1 Miller A. (e_1_2_11_61_1) 2022 e_1_2_11_100_1 Locklair B. (e_1_2_11_53_1) 2016 e_1_2_11_60_1 Melton G. B. (e_1_2_11_59_1) 1985 Treatment Advocacy Center (e_1_2_11_89_1) 2020 e_1_2_11_45_1 e_1_2_11_68_1 Sewell A. (e_1_2_11_83_1) 2016 e_1_2_11_41_1 Morris N. P. (e_1_2_11_62_1) 2021; 49 Zapf P. A. (e_1_2_11_101_1) 2009 e_1_2_11_64_1 National Center on Criminal Justice and Intellectual Disability (e_1_2_11_69_1) 2017 e_1_2_11_15_1 e_1_2_11_19_1 Otto R. K. (e_1_2_11_73_1) 2014 Murrie D. C. (e_1_2_11_65_1) 2020 Kapoor R. (e_1_2_11_46_1) 2011; 39 Melton G. B. (e_1_2_11_58_1) 2018 e_1_2_11_94_1 e_1_2_11_71_1 Bonnie R. J. (e_1_2_11_8_1) 2000 e_1_2_11_90_1 Sherry A. (e_1_2_11_86_1) 2021 e_1_2_11_10_1 e_1_2_11_56_1 Wortzel H. (e_1_2_11_99_1) 2007; 35 e_1_2_11_14_1 e_1_2_11_52_1 e_1_2_11_98_1 e_1_2_11_33_1 e_1_2_11_75_1 e_1_2_11_7_1 e_1_2_11_3_1 e_1_2_11_49_1 Houghton K. (e_1_2_11_42_1) 2022 McGuinness C. (e_1_2_11_57_1) 2017 Fuller D. A. (e_1_2_11_26_1) 2017 e_1_2_11_82_1 e_1_2_11_44_1 e_1_2_11_40_1 e_1_2_11_18_1 e_1_2_11_37_1 Harki G. A. (e_1_2_11_38_1) 2018 McCormick M. (e_1_2_11_55_1) 2022 |
| References_xml | – volume-title: Best practices in forensic mental health assessment: Evaluation of competence to stand trial year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_11_101_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_24_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_66_1 doi: 10.1037/law0000296 – volume-title: Assessment #3: Forensic mental health services in the United States: 2014 year: 2014 ident: e_1_2_11_22_1 – volume-title: Competency services in Colorado: Unraveling the process year: 2021 ident: e_1_2_11_79_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_10_1 – volume-title: Long, dangerous wait for hospital beds for those incompetent to stand trial year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_11_84_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_31_1 doi: 10.1080/24732850.2022.2104146 – ident: e_1_2_11_54_1 – volume-title: No place to go: Inmates declared mentally unfit to stand trial languish in jails year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_11_57_1 – year: 2022 ident: e_1_2_11_42_1 article-title: Long waits for Montana State Hospital leave psychiatric patients in jail publication-title: The Missoula Current News – ident: e_1_2_11_60_1 doi: 10.1002/bsl.2287 – ident: e_1_2_11_90_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_15_1 doi: 10.1037/lhb0000003 – ident: e_1_2_11_94_1 doi: 10.1002/bsl.699 – year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_11_38_1 article-title: Horrific deaths, brutal treatment: Mental illness in America’s jails publication-title: Virginian‐Pilot – ident: e_1_2_11_76_1 doi: 10.1037/a0021713 – ident: e_1_2_11_93_1 doi: 10.1017/s1092852919001585 – volume: 35 start-page: 357 year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_11_99_1 article-title: Incompetence to proceed to trial: Harbinger of a systemic illness publication-title: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law Online – ident: e_1_2_11_68_1 doi: 10.1037/14461-005 – year: 2021 ident: e_1_2_11_86_1 article-title: Jailed Coloradans waiting longer and longer for competency services, with sometimes tragic consequences publication-title: Colorado Public Radio – ident: e_1_2_11_40_1 doi: 10.1037/law0000210 – ident: e_1_2_11_13_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_19_1 doi: 10.1017/S1092852920000103 – ident: e_1_2_11_52_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_27_1 doi: 10.1037/law0000304 – ident: e_1_2_11_78_1 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8493-7 – year: 2019 ident: e_1_2_11_91_1 article-title: When mental illness becomes a jail sentence publication-title: The Atlantic – volume-title: Long wait for justice: People in jail face delays for mental health care before they can stand trial year: 2022 ident: e_1_2_11_61_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_44_1 doi: 10.33696/Psychiatry.1.001 – ident: e_1_2_11_92_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_74_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_28_1 doi: 10.1111/lcrp.12100 – ident: e_1_2_11_81_1 doi: 10.1111/1556‐4029.14669 – year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_11_88_1 article-title: More mentally ill persons are in jails and prisons than hospitals: A survey of the states publication-title: Treatment Advocacy Center – ident: e_1_2_11_30_1 doi: 10.1037/law0000088 – volume: 39 start-page: 311 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_11_46_1 article-title: Commentary: Jail‐based competency restoration publication-title: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law Online – ident: e_1_2_11_96_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_3_1 doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003893‐20 – volume: 49 start-page: 861 issue: 4 year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_11_85_1 article-title: Competency, ethics, and morality publication-title: Texas Tech Law Review – ident: e_1_2_11_23_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_45_1 doi: 10.1002/bsl.2501 – ident: e_1_2_11_32_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-13733-4_8 – ident: e_1_2_11_39_1 doi: 10.1093/med:psych/9780199941551.001.0001 – ident: e_1_2_11_56_1 doi: 10.1017/S1092852919001342 – volume-title: ACLU of Kansas sues over unconstitutionally long wait times for competency evaluations and treatment at Larned State Hospital year: 2022 ident: e_1_2_11_55_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_41_1 doi: 10.1037/ser0000512 – ident: e_1_2_11_17_1 doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003819‐19 – ident: e_1_2_11_5_1 doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003840‐19 – ident: e_1_2_11_7_1 doi: 10.1002/bsl.2370100303 – ident: e_1_2_11_33_1 doi: 10.1037/h0093958 – start-page: 1 volume-title: Competency to stand trial evaluations: A state‐wide review of court‐ordered reports year: 2020 ident: e_1_2_11_65_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_9_1 doi: 10.1093/med-psych/9780190052850.003.0002 – ident: e_1_2_11_16_1 – volume-title: Forensic reports and testimony: A guide to effective communication for psychologists and psychiatrists year: 2014 ident: e_1_2_11_73_1 – volume-title: L.A. County supervisors order report on unexplained surge in mental competency cases year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_11_83_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_77_1 doi: 10.1080/24732850.2020.1714398 – volume-title: Long waitlist for defendants incompetent to stand trial at Texas Mental Health Hospitals year: 2022 ident: e_1_2_11_21_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_51_1 doi: 10.1037/law0000306 – ident: e_1_2_11_6_1 doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113069 – ident: e_1_2_11_20_1 doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003772‐18 – ident: e_1_2_11_48_1 doi: 10.1037/lhb0000398 – ident: e_1_2_11_71_1 doi: 10.1017/s1092852919001561 – volume-title: Competency of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the criminal justice system: A call to action for the criminal justice community year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_11_69_1 – volume-title: Emptying the ‘New Asylums’ A beds capacity model to reduce mental illness behind bars year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_11_26_1 – volume-title: Young black man jailed since April for alleged $5 theft found dead in cell year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_11_87_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_95_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_11_1 doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900483 – ident: e_1_2_11_4_1 doi: 10.1002/bsl.2309 – volume-title: Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers year: 2018 ident: e_1_2_11_58_1 – volume: 49 start-page: 530 year: 2021 ident: e_1_2_11_62_1 article-title: Estimating annual numbers of competency to stand trial evaluations across the United States publication-title: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law – volume: 2 start-page: 102 year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_11_34_1 article-title: Guidance for improving forensic reports: A review of common errors publication-title: Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology – ident: e_1_2_11_14_1 – volume-title: The handbook of evidence‐based criminal justice practices ident: e_1_2_11_67_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_97_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_2_1 – volume: 35 start-page: S3 year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_11_63_1 article-title: AAPL practice guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial publication-title: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law – ident: e_1_2_11_82_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_98_1 doi: 10.1017/S1092852919001044 – ident: e_1_2_11_29_1 doi: 10.1037/law0000190 – ident: e_1_2_11_12_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_35_1 doi: 10.1037/pas0000388 – ident: e_1_2_11_43_1 – volume-title: State standards for civil commitment year: 2020 ident: e_1_2_11_89_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_37_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_49_1 doi: 10.1037/lhb0000236 – ident: e_1_2_11_47_1 doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003926‐20 – ident: e_1_2_11_64_1 doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197649138.013.20 – ident: e_1_2_11_18_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_50_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_70_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1005422702678 – volume-title: Going, going, gone: Trends and consequences of eliminating state psychiatric beds, 2016 year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_11_25_1 – volume-title: Due process problems with civil commitment of incompetent defendants: The current round of litigation and the next year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_11_53_1 – start-page: 73 volume-title: Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_11_8_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_80_1 doi: 10.1089/jchc.20.08.0075 – ident: e_1_2_11_36_1 doi: 10.1037/tps0000114 – ident: e_1_2_11_72_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_100_1 doi: 10.1300/J158v04n01_02 – volume-title: Community mental health centers and the courts: An evaluation of community‐based forensic services year: 1985 ident: e_1_2_11_59_1 – ident: e_1_2_11_75_1 |
| SSID | ssj0005859 |
| Score | 2.4503627 |
| Snippet | Across the United States, court orders for competence to stand trial (CST) evaluations and competence restoration services have been increasing much more... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | 310 |
| SubjectTerms | Court orders Crises Evolution Hospitalization Mental competency Restoration Urgency |
| Title | Evaluations of competence to stand trial are evolving amid a national “competency crisis” |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37056195 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2872919457 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2801975526 |
| Volume | 41 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LbtQwFLWmZdMNKuU1tCAjIbGIEpLYTiZLNB1UHkUItaIbFNmOI1WaJqjJqCqrfgeCn-uXcB3HTlqKVNhkRkmc1z25r9x7jNALGcaFKEPmSz4TPtU0hCISoAwL8A1IQoqM6m7k_Y_J3iF9d8SOJpMfo6qlVSsC-f3GvpL_kSqsA7nqLtl_kKw7KKyA_yBfWIKEYXkrGS8cVXdjy8OND6w9yi5J4JlZOXR5lwJF1GUP-Mlx4XHPpQFtvcPcjT_3QJc0x43dsnvl0-_Q2N-bz6bDj_Zgl0NKfF_nFtXQxe7NA1frU59B8GxTOl8CT2eineavDeuBbthWlbdwoz5xWwHy9pR774NxviImriDLqrWUMJ9kpCfANmpX84SGqZmP2uplGo3wx0ZKlvSFsMZeE9M4_YcpMNSyolkGmnN_MHf2E_81K-hqEw2Pc5zDyFyPXEN3YghB9OwYu58HajIIs7rQyt6NJTYO41f2nFddnb_EL50fc7CJ7vYBCH5t0HQPTVS1hdY-8LMttOGs4fl99HUELlyXeAAXbmvcgQt34MIALmzBhTW4MMcWXPjy4ucAK2xgdXnx6wE6fLM4mO_5_VwcviSUtT4DY5QVCfjbJROxYiyF37DkRCRZAWExj4pUJWAREs4ixQpJk0gIDnqK6fiNkIdovaor9RhhmbKMZpxQIQXVndtlrCIly1LOiiwNsyl6aR9bLnuiej1fyjK_Lpopeu72_GbIWW7YZ8c--bx_dZs8nsE1RRllKRzCbQbFqr-W8UrVK70PRD8pY3EyRY-MxNxJSKoD74w9ucUFbKON4TXYQevt6Uo9BUe2Fc86RP0GT2ae3Q |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluations+of+competence+to+stand+trial+are+evolving+amid+a+national+%E2%80%9Ccompetency+crisis%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Behavioral+sciences+%26+the+law&rft.au=Murrie%2C+Daniel+C.&rft.au=Gowensmith%2C+W.+Neil&rft.au=Kois%2C+Lauren+E.&rft.au=Packer%2C+Ira+K.&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.issn=0735-3936&rft.eissn=1099-0798&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=310&rft.epage=325&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fbsl.2620&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1002_bsl_2620 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0735-3936&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0735-3936&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0735-3936&client=summon |