The Heuristic Power of Oppositionality within and Between Paired-Associate Units

Two experiments are presented in which the role of oppositionality as a heuristic aid to paired-associate (PA) learning was examined. In the first experiment, subjects initially formed PA units by proffering antonyms, synonyms, and same-first-letter words to a cue word. Subsequently, both antonyms a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of general psychology Vol. 121; no. 3; pp. 267 - 281
Main Authors Ulasevich, Alec, Rychlak, Joseph F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Provincetown, Mass., etc Taylor & Francis Group 01.07.1994
Journal Press, etc
Taylor & Francis Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-1309
1940-0888
DOI10.1080/00221309.1994.9921201

Cover

More Information
Summary:Two experiments are presented in which the role of oppositionality as a heuristic aid to paired-associate (PA) learning was examined. In the first experiment, subjects initially formed PA units by proffering antonyms, synonyms, and same-first-letter words to a cue word. Subsequently, both antonyms and synonyms were freely recalled more readily than were same-first-letter words (p < .001). Cued recall favored synonyms over both other conditions (p < .05). In the second experiment, subjects learned related PA units in which the stimulus terms bore either an antonymous or a synonymous relationship. Fifty percent fewer association errors occurred when the PA stimuli were antonyms than when they were synonyms (p < .05). Thus, oppositionality reflected heuristic properties both within and between PA units. Results are discussed in terms of network, feature-matching, and predicational modeling.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-1309
1940-0888
DOI:10.1080/00221309.1994.9921201