An informetrics view of the relationship between internet ethics, computer ethics and cyberethics

• Published in: Library hi tech Vol. 33; no. 3; pp. 387 - 408
• Main Author: Onyancha, Omwoyo Bosire
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bradford Emerald Group Publishing Limited 21.09.2015
• Subjects: C language; Complaints; Computers; Content analysis; Crime; Cybercrime; Data sources; Developing countries; Ethics; Identification; Indexing; Information industry; Information storage; Internet; Invasion of privacy; LDCs; Librarianship/library management; Library & information science; Library technology; Search engines; Searching; Social impact; Society; Subscriptions; Trends; United Kingdom > UK; South Africa; Computers; Ethics; Information retrieval; Internet; Data mining
• ISSN: 0737-8831; 2054-166X
• DOI: 10.1108/LHT-04-2015-0033

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the differences and similarities between computer ethics, internet ethics and cyberethics as reflected in the contents of the published literature as well as the search trends on Google. Design/methodology/approach – The paper opted for an informetrics approach, and more specifically content analysis, to investigate the inter-relationships between computer ethics, internet ethics and cyberethics. The data sources for this study included Google Trends, Google Scholar and the Web of Science citation indexes. Different search queries were used, depending on the structure of each data source, to extract the relevant data sets. Findings – Using different methods and techniques to analyse the data, the paper provides an alternative means of investigating relationships among concepts. The findings indicate that there is still no clear distinction between the concepts in terms of subject and title terms used to describe the published literature on the three concepts, as well as the research areas where the three concepts are applied. Going by the current trend, the paper envisages that cyberethics may, in the future, become a broader term to include computer ethics and internet ethics. Research limitations/implications – The data sources that were selected for the study might have not been comprehensive in the coverage of the published literature on the three concepts and therefore there is need for further research, which will expand the scope of the data sources. Practical implications – The paper’s findings may apply in the practice of indexing and abstracting as well as thesaurus construction as far as the three terms are concerned. Originality/value – The paper offers an alternative technique that can be used to investigate relationships among concepts. The value of the paper could include curriculum development of programmes dealing with ethical issues that arise when developing and using computers and related technologies.