Comparison of soil zinc extractants for detection of applied zinc and prediction of leaf zinc concentration

Many soil extractants have been developed for determination of zinc (Zn) availability to plants. The optimum soil Zn extractant should be useful not only for prediction of plant Zn concentration but also for detection of applied Zn levels. The objectives of this study were: i) to compare soil Zn ext...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCommunications in soil science and plant analysis Vol. 26; no. 17/18
Main Authors Davis, J.G. (University of Georgia, Tifton, GA.), Gaines, T.P, Parker, M.B
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.10.1995
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Many soil extractants have been developed for determination of zinc (Zn) availability to plants. The optimum soil Zn extractant should be useful not only for prediction of plant Zn concentration but also for detection of applied Zn levels. The objectives of this study were: i) to compare soil Zn extractants for detecting applied Zn and for predicting peanut leaf Zn over a range of soil pH levels, and ii) to correlate other soil-extractable Zn levels with Mehlich-1. Soil and peanut leaf samples were taken from a field study testing pH levels as the main plots and Zn application rates in the sub-plots. Extractable Zn was determined on soil samples using Mehlich-1, Mehlich-3, DTPA, MgNO3, and many dilute salt extractants of varied strength and pH. Correlation of extractable soil Zn to cumulative applied Zn levels revealed Mehlich-1, Mehlich-3, DTPA, and AlCl3 extractants to be among the best indicators of applied Zn. Leaf Zn concentration was best correlated with soil Zn extracted by dilute salts, such as KCl CaCl2 NH4Cl, CaSO4, and MgCl2. Including soil pH as an independent variable in the regression to predict leaf Zn considerably improved R-square values. The DTPA-extractable soil Zn levels were very well correlated with Mehlich-1-extractable Zn. Mehlich-3 extracted about 20% more soil Zn than Mehlich-1, but Mehlich-3 soil Zn was not as well correlated to Mehlich-1 soil Zn as DTPA soil Zn. Lower pH solutions extracted more of the applied Zn, but more neutral solutions extracted Zn amounts which were better correlated with Zn uptake. On the other hand, Mehlich-1, which had a lower pH, had better correlations with both applied Zn and leaf Zn than did Mehlich-3. Shortening the DTPA extraction time to 30 minutes resulted in better correlations than the standard two hour extraction time. Chloride (Cl) was the best anion tested in relation to soil applied Zn recovery in combination with potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and aluminum (Al), and Cl optimized leaf Zn correlations
AbstractList Many soil extractants have been developed for determination of zinc (Zn) availability to plants. The optimum soil Zn extractant should be useful not only for prediction of plant Zn concentration but also for detection of applied Zn levels. The objectives of this study were: i) to compare soil Zn extractants for detecting applied Zn and for predicting peanut leaf Zn over a range of soil pH levels, and ii) to correlate other soil-extractable Zn levels with Mehlich-1. Soil and peanut leaf samples were taken from a field study testing pH levels as the main plots and Zn application rates in the sub-plots. Extractable Zn was determined on soil samples using Mehlich-1, Mehlich-3, DTPA, MgNO3, and many dilute salt extractants of varied strength and pH. Correlation of extractable soil Zn to cumulative applied Zn levels revealed Mehlich-1, Mehlich-3, DTPA, and AlCl3 extractants to be among the best indicators of applied Zn. Leaf Zn concentration was best correlated with soil Zn extracted by dilute salts, such as KCl CaCl2 NH4Cl, CaSO4, and MgCl2. Including soil pH as an independent variable in the regression to predict leaf Zn considerably improved R-square values. The DTPA-extractable soil Zn levels were very well correlated with Mehlich-1-extractable Zn. Mehlich-3 extracted about 20% more soil Zn than Mehlich-1, but Mehlich-3 soil Zn was not as well correlated to Mehlich-1 soil Zn as DTPA soil Zn. Lower pH solutions extracted more of the applied Zn, but more neutral solutions extracted Zn amounts which were better correlated with Zn uptake. On the other hand, Mehlich-1, which had a lower pH, had better correlations with both applied Zn and leaf Zn than did Mehlich-3. Shortening the DTPA extraction time to 30 minutes resulted in better correlations than the standard two hour extraction time. Chloride (Cl) was the best anion tested in relation to soil applied Zn recovery in combination with potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and aluminum (Al), and Cl optimized leaf Zn correlations
Author Davis, J.G. (University of Georgia, Tifton, GA.)
Parker, M.B
Gaines, T.P
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Davis, J.G. (University of Georgia, Tifton, GA.)
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Gaines, T.P
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Parker, M.B
BookMark eNo9j81KxDAURoOMYGf0AXSVF6jmv81SBnWEARc66yFNbiRak9JkIT69GSpu7r0f5_DBXaNVTBEQuqbklpKe3BFCCVdMS6K5qpOeoYZKzlomqFqh5sTbKogLtM75o0bdEdagz236mswccoo4eZxTGPFPiBbDd5mNLSaWjH2asYMCtoRFM9M0BnCLaaLD0wwu_OMRjF-YTdFCrE0ndInOvRkzXP3tDTo8Prxtd-3-5el5e79vLReitBS4HayXTkI_CKZBES2d8L3hdACipBfCcs19X0XuuRJGyV51rJO6noZt0M3S6006mvf63PHwqhXhTHfsF3aJWZw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_00103629909370325
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gexplo_2011_07_004
crossref_primary_10_1081_CSS_120003072
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0269_7491_00_00116_0
crossref_primary_10_2134_jeq2016_05_0184
crossref_primary_10_1080_00103629809370053
crossref_primary_10_1590_S0100_06831999000400009
crossref_primary_10_1590_S0100_06832009000300017
ContentType Journal Article
DBID FBQ
DOI 10.1080/00103629509369501
DatabaseName AGRIS
DatabaseTitleList
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: FBQ
  name: AGRIS
  url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
EISSN 1532-2416
ExternalDocumentID US9603297
GroupedDBID .7F
.QJ
07X
0BK
0R~
29F
2DF
30N
3YN
4.4
5GY
5VS
AAAVI
AAENE
AAGME
AAJMT
AALDU
AAMIU
AAOAP
AAPUL
AAQRR
ABCCY
ABEFU
ABFIM
ABFMO
ABHAV
ABJNI
ABJVF
ABLIJ
ABPEM
ABPTK
ABQHQ
ABTAI
ABXUL
ABXYU
ACBBU
ACDHJ
ACGEJ
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACQMU
ACTIO
ACZPZ
ADCVX
ADGTB
ADGTR
ADOPC
ADXPE
AEGYZ
AEISY
AENEX
AEOZL
AEPSL
AEYOC
AFDYB
AFKVX
AFOLD
AFRAH
AFWLO
AGDLA
AGMYJ
AHDLD
AI.
AIJEM
AIRXU
AJBAX
AJWEG
AKBVH
AKOOK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
APNXG
AQRUH
AURDB
AVBZW
AWYRJ
BFWEY
BLEHA
C0.
C5I
CAG
CCCUG
CE4
COF
CS3
CWRZV
DGEBU
DKSSO
DLOXE
DU5
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
E~A
E~B
F5P
FBQ
FUNRP
FVPDL
GTTXZ
HF~
HGUVV
HZ~
H~P
IPNFZ
J.P
JEPSP
KYCEM
L84
LJTGL
M4Z
NA5
NUSFT
NX0
O9-
OWHGL
P2P
PCLFJ
RIG
RNANH
ROSJB
RTWRZ
S-T
SNACF
TEI
TFL
TFT
TFW
TGX
TQWBC
TTHFI
TWF
UB7
UT5
UU3
V1K
VH1
Y6R
ZGOLN
~02
~KM
~S~
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-1e3cbcf5d5e8b429e6095d4f8a31be065f44c393f8e3c3f364a6586727594a6a2
ISSN 0010-3624
IngestDate Wed Dec 27 19:00:37 EST 2023
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 17/18
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c344t-1e3cbcf5d5e8b429e6095d4f8a31be065f44c393f8e3c3f364a6586727594a6a2
Notes F61
P33
9603297
ParticipantIDs fao_agris_US9603297
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate 1995-10-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1995-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 1995
  text: 1995-10-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationTitle Communications in soil science and plant analysis
PublicationYear 1995
SSID ssj0019702
Score 1.4976876
Snippet Many soil extractants have been developed for determination of zinc (Zn) availability to plants. The optimum soil Zn extractant should be useful not only for...
SourceID fao
SourceType Publisher
SubjectTerms ANALISIS DEL SUELO
ANALYSE DE SOL
ARACHIS HYPOGAEA
CINC
CONTENIDO MINERAL
DISPONIBILIDAD DE NUTRIENTES
DISPONIBILITE D'ELEMENT NUTRITIF
FEUILLE
HOJAS
PH DEL SUELO
PH DU SOL
PROPIEDADES FISICO-QUIMICAS SUELO
PROPRIETE PHYSICOCHIMIQUE DU SOL
TECHNIQUE DE PREVISION
TECNICAS DE PREDICCION
TENEUR EN ELEMENTS MINERAUX
ZINC
Title Comparison of soil zinc extractants for detection of applied zinc and prediction of leaf zinc concentration
Volume 26
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1NS8MwGA5TL3oQP_GbHLyNlrXp2vQ4RSeDCeIG3iRNEymODnRe_AH-bt83ST8mO6iXUJI0G3mfJE-T93lDyKVkuhdpYG4yj7kXSRQrx5p5usdCgfHJpMJ9yPF9fDeNRk_9p07nq-W19LHIfPm5UlfyH6tCHtgVVbJ_sGzdKGTAM9gXUrAwpL-y8XX7EsHu-7yYdT-LUnZhwkXxk3FxQTfCXC2UrKihcLzT1HRhAvKiLp4poW2ZREVj6cLqtknskqjE-NOan64UQqbNmTC-6zbiSbMd7kIajPyhb3Z7l9xCzP68dd6dFNr59Q8Hfmu3YigKd7fAxK-VaUa5bZA39q-abQwjC68c4uqpGReE2AqqfVXNxqEHFCNuT9dWYF_B0gQM4CvXgsp5MsBFOgVixGJIg2bhq90Rp4_wHcfCNFkjawnH2fL26qE-i0qTno057_5gdTaOEdp_Ng4MRYs2Q5nskG33aUEHFie7pKPKPbI1eHlz4VXUPnltEEPnmqLZKNqathBDATG0RgxWc4ixNcG6tEEMFiNibNkSYg7I9PZmcn3nues2PMmiaOEFislM6n7eVzwDmqIwFmEOA1mwIFNAVTWMXJYyzaEi0yyOBNBXPMnvp_AowkOyXs5LdUQoZ4ILmaSaKQnv8IyHgcgSeClRyMiPyR5007OAHnh_rnv_ZGXuKdls8HJGNjQMXnUOTHCRXRhDfQPeh13m
link.rule.ids 783
linkProvider FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+soil+zinc+extractants+for+detection+of+applied+zinc+and+prediction+of+leaf+zinc+concentration&rft.jtitle=Communications+in+soil+science+and+plant+analysis&rft.au=Davis%2C+J.G.+%28University+of+Georgia%2C+Tifton%2C+GA.%29&rft.au=Gaines%2C+T.P&rft.au=Parker%2C+M.B&rft.date=1995-10-01&rft.issn=0010-3624&rft.eissn=1532-2416&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=17%2F18&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F00103629509369501&rft.externalDocID=US9603297
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0010-3624&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0010-3624&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0010-3624&client=summon