Effect of muscle opposition during rigor on development of broiler breast meat tenderness

Two experiments were conducted to determine the effect of mutual opposition of breast muscles during rigor development on ultimate tenderness of the cooked meat. In each experiment, 32 broilers were conventionally processed. Immediately after evisceration, the supracoracoideus tendon was cut at the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPoultry science Vol. 76; no. 5; pp. 785 - 787
Main Authors Cason, J.A. (USDA, ARS, Russell Research Center, Athens, GA.), Lyon, C.E, Papa, C.M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.05.1997
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Two experiments were conducted to determine the effect of mutual opposition of breast muscles during rigor development on ultimate tenderness of the cooked meat. In each experiment, 32 broilers were conventionally processed. Immediately after evisceration, the supracoracoideus tendon was cut at the humeral insertion on one wing (treatment) and the opposite wing was sham-operated with the tendon exposed but not cut (control). The tendon of insertion for the Pectoralis minor muscle was cut to prevent the opposition of breast muscles during rigor, while avoiding confounding effects caused by making cuts on the muscles, as would occur during typical deboning. Cutting the tendon significantly (P 0.05) increased Warner-Bratzler shear values after cooking for both the Pectoralis major and P. minor. Deboning at 2 h post-mortem resulted in shear values for the P. major of 7.22 kg for controls and 9.08 kg for treated carcasses; P. minor shear values were 2.98 kg for controls and 4.04 kg for treated carcasses. Deboning at 24 h post-mortem produced P. major shear values of 4.68 kg for controls and 5.68 kg for treated carcasses. On whole carcasses, breast muscle opposition during rigor contributes to the tenderness of the cooked meat
Bibliography:Q04
1997051070
Q02
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0032-5791
1525-3171
DOI:10.1093/ps/76.5.785