Which Keratometer is Most Reliable for Correcting Astigmatism with Toric Intraocular Lenses?

To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL). Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratometer, were performed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKorean journal of ophthalmology Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 10 - 14
Main Authors Chang, Minwook, Kang, Su-Yeon, Kim, Hyo Myung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) The Korean Ophthalmological Society 01.02.2012
대한안과학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1011-8942
2092-9382
2092-9382
DOI10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL). Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratometer, were performed preoperatively in order to evaluate preexisting corneal astigmatism. Differences between the true residual astigmatism and the anticipated residual astigmatism (keratometric error) were compared at one and three months after surgery by using a separate vector analysis to identify the keratometric method that provided the highest accuracy for astigmatism control. The mean keratomeric error was 0.52 diopters (0.17-1.17) for the manual keratometer, 0.62 (0-1.31) for the IOL master, 0.69 (0.08-1.92) for the Pentacam, and 0.59 (0.08-0.94) for the auto keratometer. The manual keratometer was the most accurate, although there was no significant difference between the keratometers (p > 0.05). All of the keratometers achieved an average keratometric error of less than one diopter. Manual keratometry was the most accurate of the four methods evaluated, although the other techniques were equally satisfactory in determining corneal astigmatism.
AbstractList Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratometer, were performed preoperatively in order to evaluate preexisting corneal astigmatism. Differences between the true residual astigmatism and the anticipated residual astigmatism (keratometric error) were compared at one and three months after surgery by using a separate vector analysis to identify the keratometric method that provided the highest accuracy for astigmatism control. Results: The mean keratomeric error was 0.52 diopters (0.17-1.17) for the manual keratometer, 0.62 (0-1.31) for the IOL master, 0.69 (0.08-1.92) for the Pentacam, and 0.59 (0.08-0.94) for the auto keratometer. The manual keratometer was the most accurate, although there was no significant difference between the keratometers (p > 0.05). All of the keratometers achieved an average keratometric error of less than one diopter. Conclusions: Manual keratometry was the most accurate of the four methods evaluated, although the other techniques were equally satisfactory in determining corneal astigmatism. KCI Citation Count: 3
To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL). Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratometer, were performed preoperatively in order to evaluate preexisting corneal astigmatism. Differences between the true residual astigmatism and the anticipated residual astigmatism (keratometric error) were compared at one and three months after surgery by using a separate vector analysis to identify the keratometric method that provided the highest accuracy for astigmatism control. The mean keratomeric error was 0.52 diopters (0.17-1.17) for the manual keratometer, 0.62 (0-1.31) for the IOL master, 0.69 (0.08-1.92) for the Pentacam, and 0.59 (0.08-0.94) for the auto keratometer. The manual keratometer was the most accurate, although there was no significant difference between the keratometers (p > 0.05). All of the keratometers achieved an average keratometric error of less than one diopter. Manual keratometry was the most accurate of the four methods evaluated, although the other techniques were equally satisfactory in determining corneal astigmatism.
To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL).PURPOSETo evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL).Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratometer, were performed preoperatively in order to evaluate preexisting corneal astigmatism. Differences between the true residual astigmatism and the anticipated residual astigmatism (keratometric error) were compared at one and three months after surgery by using a separate vector analysis to identify the keratometric method that provided the highest accuracy for astigmatism control.METHODSTwenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratometer, were performed preoperatively in order to evaluate preexisting corneal astigmatism. Differences between the true residual astigmatism and the anticipated residual astigmatism (keratometric error) were compared at one and three months after surgery by using a separate vector analysis to identify the keratometric method that provided the highest accuracy for astigmatism control.The mean keratomeric error was 0.52 diopters (0.17-1.17) for the manual keratometer, 0.62 (0-1.31) for the IOL master, 0.69 (0.08-1.92) for the Pentacam, and 0.59 (0.08-0.94) for the auto keratometer. The manual keratometer was the most accurate, although there was no significant difference between the keratometers (p > 0.05). All of the keratometers achieved an average keratometric error of less than one diopter.RESULTSThe mean keratomeric error was 0.52 diopters (0.17-1.17) for the manual keratometer, 0.62 (0-1.31) for the IOL master, 0.69 (0.08-1.92) for the Pentacam, and 0.59 (0.08-0.94) for the auto keratometer. The manual keratometer was the most accurate, although there was no significant difference between the keratometers (p > 0.05). All of the keratometers achieved an average keratometric error of less than one diopter.Manual keratometry was the most accurate of the four methods evaluated, although the other techniques were equally satisfactory in determining corneal astigmatism.CONCLUSIONSManual keratometry was the most accurate of the four methods evaluated, although the other techniques were equally satisfactory in determining corneal astigmatism.
Author Kim, Hyo Myung
Chang, Minwook
Kang, Su-Yeon
AuthorAffiliation Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Minwook
  surname: Chang
  fullname: Chang, Minwook
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Su-Yeon
  surname: Kang
  fullname: Kang, Su-Yeon
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hyo Myung
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Hyo Myung
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22323879$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001632157$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNp1kd2LEzEUxYOsuN3Vd58kb_rSMV8zybwopfhRrAhLxRchZDI3bbYzkzVJFf970-2uqODTheR3zrncc4HOpjABQk8pqTgX9OX-OlSMUFaxpqIVJQ_QjJGWzVuu2BmaUULpXLWCnaOLlK4JaSgn8hE6Z4wzrmQ7Q1-_7Lzd4Q8QTQ4jZIjYJ_wxpIyvYPCmGwC7EPEyxAg2-2mLFyn77WiyTyP-4fMOb0L0Fq-mHE2wh8FEvIYpQXr9GD10Zkjw5G5eos9v32yW7-frT-9Wy8V6brngpGzYMelqqgS1kjSqBdHXtZNNDUZKK_u-F8wJYdq6U4rKuiempc5Rw5QB1vFL9OLkO0Wn99brYPzt3Aa9j3pxtVlpWRMuZEFfndCbQzdCb-G49aBvoh9N_Hkr_Ptn8rti811z1ijasGLw_M4ghm8HSFmPPlkYBjNBOCTdMkqFJEQV8tmfUb8z7o9fgOYE2BhSiuC09bncNRyT_aAp0ceWdWlZH1vWrNG0vBYh-Ud47_1fyS-2zKsg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfo_2017_11_002
crossref_primary_10_1097_ICL_0000000000000901
crossref_primary_10_5301_ejo_5000575
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfo_2017_08_008
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40662_017_0086_6
crossref_primary_10_3341_jkos_2014_55_11_1636
crossref_primary_10_3341_jkos_2015_56_10_1544
crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S237757
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2415_12_21
crossref_primary_10_3928_1081597X_20131115_03
crossref_primary_10_29413_ABS_2021_6_6_1_23
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_019_01186_6
crossref_primary_10_1111_cxo_13002
crossref_primary_10_3928_1081597X_20180530_01
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_021_01720_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_013_9895_3
crossref_primary_10_1080_02713683_2018_1488264
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12886_017_0399_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40135_016_0088_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_optom_2019_06_001
crossref_primary_10_3341_jkos_2013_54_9_1345
crossref_primary_10_47572_muskutd_1523840
crossref_primary_10_3928_1081597X_20130415_06
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.044
10.1111/j.1755-3768.1994.tb02729.x
10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.11.043
10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01214-7
10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.033
10.3341/kjo.2009.23.1.6
10.1034/j.1600-0420.2003.00092.x
10.1097/ICU.0b013e328011f9bf
10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.013
10.3129/i09-048
10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02154.x
10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00203.x
10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01179-8
10.1097/00006324-200304000-00011
10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80251-3
10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.05.031
10.1007/s004170000188
10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00701.x
10.1016/S0002-9394(14)74917-7
10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.030
10.1016/j.ajo.2009.01.004
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2012 The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2012
Copyright_xml – notice: 2012 The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2012
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ACYCR
DOI 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2092-9382
EndPage 14
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_750347
PMC3268162
22323879
10_3341_kjo_2012_26_1_10
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
29L
2WC
5-W
53G
5GY
8JR
8XY
9ZL
AAYXX
ACYCR
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
CITATION
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBS
EF.
EJD
F5P
FRP
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
KQ8
M48
MZR
O5R
O5S
OK1
P5Y
P6G
PGMZT
RPM
TR2
ZZE
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
85H
5PM
HZB
M~E
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3430-89b27f51841c70689e4d55f765ea77c7ddd42f44a95b88175d0a91ff1a28ae2b3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1011-8942
2092-9382
IngestDate Tue Nov 21 21:42:29 EST 2023
Thu Aug 21 18:18:19 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 14:06:53 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:04:41 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:57:27 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:52:09 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Toric intraocular lenses
Cataract
Keratometer
Keratometric error
Astigmatism
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3430-89b27f51841c70689e4d55f765ea77c7ddd42f44a95b88175d0a91ff1a28ae2b3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
G704-002170.2012.26.1.005
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10
PMID 22323879
PQID 921147008
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_750347
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3268162
proquest_miscellaneous_921147008
pubmed_primary_22323879
crossref_citationtrail_10_3341_kjo_2012_26_1_10
crossref_primary_10_3341_kjo_2012_26_1_10
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2012-Feb
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2012
  text: 2012-Feb
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Korean journal of ophthalmology
PublicationTitleAlternate Korean J Ophthalmol
PublicationYear 2012
Publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
대한안과학회
Publisher_xml – name: The Korean Ophthalmological Society
– name: 대한안과학회
References Weinand (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref4) 2007; 33
Vogel (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref16) 2001; 27
Choi (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref15) 2004; 45
Gonzalez-Meijome (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref11) 2004; 24
Sheppard (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref12) 2010; 30
Hoffer (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref1) 1980; 90
Goyal (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref18) 2003; 81
Ninn-Pedersen (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref2) 1994; 72
Shankar (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref13) 2008; 34
Statham (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref22) 2009; 37
Ahmed (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref21) 2010; 36
Ruiz-Mesa (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref8) 2009; 147
Haigis (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref17) 2000; 238
Mendicute (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref3) 2008; 34
Dardzhikova (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref7) 2009; 44
Mendicute (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref9) 2009; 35
Kim (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref20) 2009; 23
Bauer (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref5) 2008; 34
Davies (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref10) 2003; 80
Husain (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref23) 1996; 22
Horn (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref6) 2007; 18
Connors (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref14) 2002; 28
Kim (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref19) 2003; 44
20444118 - Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Mar;30(2):143-51
17466851 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 May;33(5):800-3
18361982 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Apr;34(4):601-7
19878222 - Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;37(8):775-9
12859258 - Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003 Aug;81(4):331-5
15315653 - Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004 Sep;24(5):391-8
8017180 - Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1994 Feb;72(1):10-5
20362853 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;36(4):609-16
11821202 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Feb;28(2):235-8
7425052 - Am J Ophthalmol. 1980 Sep;90(3):360-8
19286153 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;147(6):990-6, 996.e1
19491980 - Can J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;44(3):269-73
19337472 - Korean J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;23(1):6-12
11045345 - Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000 Sep;238(9):765-73
12692490 - Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Apr;80(4):320-4
18721707 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Sep;34(9):1483-8
18165089 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Jan;34(1):103-13
17159449 - Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007 Feb;18(1):58-61
19251137 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Mar;35(3):451-8
8778372 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Apr;22(3):362-6
11738911 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Dec;27(12):1961-8
References_xml – volume: 45
  start-page: 1665
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref15
  publication-title: J Korean Ophthalmol Soc
– volume: 36
  start-page: 609
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref21
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.044
– volume: 72
  start-page: 10
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref2
  publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)
  doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1994.tb02729.x
– volume: 35
  start-page: 451
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref9
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.11.043
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1961
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref16
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01214-7
– volume: 34
  start-page: 601
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref3
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.033
– volume: 23
  start-page: 6
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref20
  publication-title: Korean J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.3341/kjo.2009.23.1.6
– volume: 81
  start-page: 331
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref18
  publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol Scand
  doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2003.00092.x
– volume: 18
  start-page: 58
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref6
  publication-title: Curr Opin Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328011f9bf
– volume: 34
  start-page: 103
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref13
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.013
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1519
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref19
  publication-title: J Korean Ophthalmol Soc
– volume: 44
  start-page: 269
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref7
  publication-title: Can J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.3129/i09-048
– volume: 37
  start-page: 775
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref22
  publication-title: Clin Experiment Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02154.x
– volume: 24
  start-page: 391
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref11
  publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
  doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00203.x
– volume: 28
  start-page: 235
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref14
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01179-8
– volume: 80
  start-page: 320
  year: 2003
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref10
  publication-title: Optom Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1097/00006324-200304000-00011
– volume: 22
  start-page: 362
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref23
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80251-3
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1483
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref5
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.05.031
– volume: 238
  start-page: 765
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref17
  publication-title: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1007/s004170000188
– volume: 30
  start-page: 143
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref12
  publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
  doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00701.x
– volume: 90
  start-page: 360
  year: 1980
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref1
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)74917-7
– volume: 33
  start-page: 800
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref4
  publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.030
– volume: 147
  start-page: 990
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref8
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.01.004
– reference: 17466851 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 May;33(5):800-3
– reference: 19286153 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;147(6):990-6, 996.e1
– reference: 17159449 - Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007 Feb;18(1):58-61
– reference: 8017180 - Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1994 Feb;72(1):10-5
– reference: 15315653 - Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004 Sep;24(5):391-8
– reference: 19491980 - Can J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;44(3):269-73
– reference: 11821202 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Feb;28(2):235-8
– reference: 11738911 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Dec;27(12):1961-8
– reference: 7425052 - Am J Ophthalmol. 1980 Sep;90(3):360-8
– reference: 18165089 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Jan;34(1):103-13
– reference: 19251137 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Mar;35(3):451-8
– reference: 11045345 - Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000 Sep;238(9):765-73
– reference: 20444118 - Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Mar;30(2):143-51
– reference: 18721707 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Sep;34(9):1483-8
– reference: 18361982 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Apr;34(4):601-7
– reference: 20362853 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;36(4):609-16
– reference: 19337472 - Korean J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;23(1):6-12
– reference: 19878222 - Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;37(8):775-9
– reference: 12859258 - Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003 Aug;81(4):331-5
– reference: 8778372 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Apr;22(3):362-6
– reference: 12692490 - Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Apr;80(4):320-4
SSID ssj0061307
Score 2.06333
Snippet To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL). Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric...
To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL).PURPOSETo evaluate the accuracy of...
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: Twenty-five eyes received...
SourceID nrf
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 10
SubjectTerms Analysis of Variance
Astigmatism - complications
Astigmatism - surgery
Cataract Extraction
Female
Humans
Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods
Lenses, Intraocular
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Original
Prospective Studies
Refraction, Ocular
Reproducibility of Results
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity
안과학
Title Which Keratometer is Most Reliable for Correcting Astigmatism with Toric Intraocular Lenses?
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22323879
https://www.proquest.com/docview/921147008
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3268162
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001632157
Volume 26
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Korean Journal of Ophthalmology, 2012, 26(1), , pp.10-14
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Li9RAEG7cFcSL-DarDi148ZDZpNPpx0EWEZdVGE8OuwehSfrhZGcm0WQW1n9vVZIdHRn0FEg6KVJVSX3V9SLktROSZZmzsSqTMgZ8q2MllI1BmwJj3pWudxRnn8XZnH-6yC9-l0ePDOz2unY4T2rerqbXP36ewAf_Fj1O-AkfLy-xii9lUyam6RTrrW6DXRKo4zO-jSkgUMbiaZZoFutMsSFoufcJO0bqoG7DPvz5dxrlH3bp9D65NwJK-m7QgAfklq8fkjuzMWT-iHw9X1R2QZfYPLlZY_ILrTq6broNbf2qwsopCsCVWhzTYTEJmhbYeAORbLemuE9L-0YitEL6TZ-3SsFWdb47eUzmpx--vD-Lx5EKsc14lsRKl0yGHNy61MpEKO25y_MgRe4LKa10znEWOC90XioF0MIlhU5DSAumCs_K7Ak5rJvaPyPUM6aZDSXCLp6noQAgCIDBcV4Kz3MbkeMbHho79hvHsRcrA34Hct0A1w1y3TBhUjgbkTfbO74PvTb-sfYViMUsbWWwQTYevzVm2RpwAz4aDM5yGRF6IzQDHw1GQoraN1ed0eD2cgnwJyJPBxluCQJcAhQjdUTkjnS3C5Dc7pW6WvR9uYEBKhXs6P9kn5O7-DJD9vcLcrhpr_xLADebckIO8vh80m8NTHr9_QXIKflk
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which+keratometer+is+most+reliable+for+correcting+astigmatism+with+toric+intraocular+lenses%3F&rft.jtitle=Korean+journal+of+ophthalmology&rft.au=Chang%2C+Minwook&rft.au=Kang%2C+Su-Yeon&rft.au=Kim%2C+Hyo+Myung&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.issn=2092-9382&rft.eissn=2092-9382&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.3341%2Fkjo.2012.26.1.10&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1011-8942&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1011-8942&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1011-8942&client=summon