Which Keratometer is Most Reliable for Correcting Astigmatism with Toric Intraocular Lenses?
To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL). Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratometer, were performed...
Saved in:
Published in | Korean journal of ophthalmology Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 10 - 14 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korea (South)
The Korean Ophthalmological Society
01.02.2012
대한안과학회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1011-8942 2092-9382 2092-9382 |
DOI | 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL).
Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratometer, were performed preoperatively in order to evaluate preexisting corneal astigmatism. Differences between the true residual astigmatism and the anticipated residual astigmatism (keratometric error) were compared at one and three months after surgery by using a separate vector analysis to identify the keratometric method that provided the highest accuracy for astigmatism control.
The mean keratomeric error was 0.52 diopters (0.17-1.17) for the manual keratometer, 0.62 (0-1.31) for the IOL master, 0.69 (0.08-1.92) for the Pentacam, and 0.59 (0.08-0.94) for the auto keratometer. The manual keratometer was the most accurate, although there was no significant difference between the keratometers (p > 0.05). All of the keratometers achieved an average keratometric error of less than one diopter.
Manual keratometry was the most accurate of the four methods evaluated, although the other techniques were equally satisfactory in determining corneal astigmatism. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL).
Methods: Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratometer, were performed preoperatively in order to evaluate preexisting corneal astigmatism. Differences between the true residual astigmatism and the anticipated residual astigmatism (keratometric error) were compared at one and three months after surgery by using a separate vector analysis to identify the keratometric method that provided the highest accuracy for astigmatism control.
Results: The mean keratomeric error was 0.52 diopters (0.17-1.17) for the manual keratometer, 0.62 (0-1.31) for the IOL master, 0.69 (0.08-1.92) for the Pentacam, and 0.59 (0.08-0.94) for the auto keratometer. The manual keratometer was the most accurate, although there was no significant difference between the keratometers (p > 0.05). All of the keratometers achieved an average keratometric error of less than one diopter.
Conclusions: Manual keratometry was the most accurate of the four methods evaluated, although the other techniques were equally satisfactory in determining corneal astigmatism. KCI Citation Count: 3 To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL). Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratometer, were performed preoperatively in order to evaluate preexisting corneal astigmatism. Differences between the true residual astigmatism and the anticipated residual astigmatism (keratometric error) were compared at one and three months after surgery by using a separate vector analysis to identify the keratometric method that provided the highest accuracy for astigmatism control. The mean keratomeric error was 0.52 diopters (0.17-1.17) for the manual keratometer, 0.62 (0-1.31) for the IOL master, 0.69 (0.08-1.92) for the Pentacam, and 0.59 (0.08-0.94) for the auto keratometer. The manual keratometer was the most accurate, although there was no significant difference between the keratometers (p > 0.05). All of the keratometers achieved an average keratometric error of less than one diopter. Manual keratometry was the most accurate of the four methods evaluated, although the other techniques were equally satisfactory in determining corneal astigmatism. To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL).PURPOSETo evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL).Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratometer, were performed preoperatively in order to evaluate preexisting corneal astigmatism. Differences between the true residual astigmatism and the anticipated residual astigmatism (keratometric error) were compared at one and three months after surgery by using a separate vector analysis to identify the keratometric method that provided the highest accuracy for astigmatism control.METHODSTwenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric IOL implantation. Four different keratometric methods, a manual keratometer, an IOL master, a Pentacam and an auto keratometer, were performed preoperatively in order to evaluate preexisting corneal astigmatism. Differences between the true residual astigmatism and the anticipated residual astigmatism (keratometric error) were compared at one and three months after surgery by using a separate vector analysis to identify the keratometric method that provided the highest accuracy for astigmatism control.The mean keratomeric error was 0.52 diopters (0.17-1.17) for the manual keratometer, 0.62 (0-1.31) for the IOL master, 0.69 (0.08-1.92) for the Pentacam, and 0.59 (0.08-0.94) for the auto keratometer. The manual keratometer was the most accurate, although there was no significant difference between the keratometers (p > 0.05). All of the keratometers achieved an average keratometric error of less than one diopter.RESULTSThe mean keratomeric error was 0.52 diopters (0.17-1.17) for the manual keratometer, 0.62 (0-1.31) for the IOL master, 0.69 (0.08-1.92) for the Pentacam, and 0.59 (0.08-0.94) for the auto keratometer. The manual keratometer was the most accurate, although there was no significant difference between the keratometers (p > 0.05). All of the keratometers achieved an average keratometric error of less than one diopter.Manual keratometry was the most accurate of the four methods evaluated, although the other techniques were equally satisfactory in determining corneal astigmatism.CONCLUSIONSManual keratometry was the most accurate of the four methods evaluated, although the other techniques were equally satisfactory in determining corneal astigmatism. |
Author | Kim, Hyo Myung Chang, Minwook Kang, Su-Yeon |
AuthorAffiliation | Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Minwook surname: Chang fullname: Chang, Minwook organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 2 givenname: Su-Yeon surname: Kang fullname: Kang, Su-Yeon organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 3 givenname: Hyo Myung surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Hyo Myung organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22323879$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001632157$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNp1kd2LEzEUxYOsuN3Vd58kb_rSMV8zybwopfhRrAhLxRchZDI3bbYzkzVJFf970-2uqODTheR3zrncc4HOpjABQk8pqTgX9OX-OlSMUFaxpqIVJQ_QjJGWzVuu2BmaUULpXLWCnaOLlK4JaSgn8hE6Z4wzrmQ7Q1-_7Lzd4Q8QTQ4jZIjYJ_wxpIyvYPCmGwC7EPEyxAg2-2mLFyn77WiyTyP-4fMOb0L0Fq-mHE2wh8FEvIYpQXr9GD10Zkjw5G5eos9v32yW7-frT-9Wy8V6brngpGzYMelqqgS1kjSqBdHXtZNNDUZKK_u-F8wJYdq6U4rKuiempc5Rw5QB1vFL9OLkO0Wn99brYPzt3Aa9j3pxtVlpWRMuZEFfndCbQzdCb-G49aBvoh9N_Hkr_Ptn8rti811z1ijasGLw_M4ghm8HSFmPPlkYBjNBOCTdMkqFJEQV8tmfUb8z7o9fgOYE2BhSiuC09bncNRyT_aAp0ceWdWlZH1vWrNG0vBYh-Ud47_1fyS-2zKsg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfo_2017_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1097_ICL_0000000000000901 crossref_primary_10_5301_ejo_5000575 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfo_2017_08_008 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40662_017_0086_6 crossref_primary_10_3341_jkos_2014_55_11_1636 crossref_primary_10_3341_jkos_2015_56_10_1544 crossref_primary_10_2147_OPTH_S237757 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2415_12_21 crossref_primary_10_3928_1081597X_20131115_03 crossref_primary_10_29413_ABS_2021_6_6_1_23 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_019_01186_6 crossref_primary_10_1111_cxo_13002 crossref_primary_10_3928_1081597X_20180530_01 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_021_01720_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10792_013_9895_3 crossref_primary_10_1080_02713683_2018_1488264 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12886_017_0399_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40135_016_0088_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_optom_2019_06_001 crossref_primary_10_3341_jkos_2013_54_9_1345 crossref_primary_10_47572_muskutd_1523840 crossref_primary_10_3928_1081597X_20130415_06 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.044 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1994.tb02729.x 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.11.043 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01214-7 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.033 10.3341/kjo.2009.23.1.6 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2003.00092.x 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328011f9bf 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.013 10.3129/i09-048 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02154.x 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00203.x 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01179-8 10.1097/00006324-200304000-00011 10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80251-3 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.05.031 10.1007/s004170000188 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00701.x 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)74917-7 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.030 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.01.004 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2012 The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2012 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2012 The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2012 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
DOI | 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2092-9382 |
EndPage | 14 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_750347 PMC3268162 22323879 10_3341_kjo_2012_26_1_10 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 29L 2WC 5-W 53G 5GY 8JR 8XY 9ZL AAYXX ACYCR ADBBV ADRAZ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL CITATION CS3 DIK E3Z EBS EF. EJD F5P FRP GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HYE KQ8 M48 MZR O5R O5S OK1 P5Y P6G PGMZT RPM TR2 ZZE CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 85H 5PM HZB M~E |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3430-89b27f51841c70689e4d55f765ea77c7ddd42f44a95b88175d0a91ff1a28ae2b3 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1011-8942 2092-9382 |
IngestDate | Tue Nov 21 21:42:29 EST 2023 Thu Aug 21 18:18:19 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 14:06:53 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:04:41 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:57:27 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:09 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Toric intraocular lenses Cataract Keratometer Keratometric error Astigmatism |
Language | English |
License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3430-89b27f51841c70689e4d55f765ea77c7ddd42f44a95b88175d0a91ff1a28ae2b3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 G704-002170.2012.26.1.005 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10 |
PMID | 22323879 |
PQID | 921147008 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_750347 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3268162 proquest_miscellaneous_921147008 pubmed_primary_22323879 crossref_citationtrail_10_3341_kjo_2012_26_1_10 crossref_primary_10_3341_kjo_2012_26_1_10 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2012-Feb |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2012 text: 2012-Feb |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Korea (South) |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Korea (South) |
PublicationTitle | Korean journal of ophthalmology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Korean J Ophthalmol |
PublicationYear | 2012 |
Publisher | The Korean Ophthalmological Society 대한안과학회 |
Publisher_xml | – name: The Korean Ophthalmological Society – name: 대한안과학회 |
References | Weinand (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref4) 2007; 33 Vogel (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref16) 2001; 27 Choi (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref15) 2004; 45 Gonzalez-Meijome (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref11) 2004; 24 Sheppard (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref12) 2010; 30 Hoffer (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref1) 1980; 90 Goyal (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref18) 2003; 81 Ninn-Pedersen (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref2) 1994; 72 Shankar (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref13) 2008; 34 Statham (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref22) 2009; 37 Ahmed (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref21) 2010; 36 Ruiz-Mesa (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref8) 2009; 147 Haigis (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref17) 2000; 238 Mendicute (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref3) 2008; 34 Dardzhikova (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref7) 2009; 44 Mendicute (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref9) 2009; 35 Kim (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref20) 2009; 23 Bauer (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref5) 2008; 34 Davies (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref10) 2003; 80 Husain (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref23) 1996; 22 Horn (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref6) 2007; 18 Connors (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref14) 2002; 28 Kim (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref19) 2003; 44 20444118 - Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Mar;30(2):143-51 17466851 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 May;33(5):800-3 18361982 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Apr;34(4):601-7 19878222 - Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;37(8):775-9 12859258 - Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003 Aug;81(4):331-5 15315653 - Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004 Sep;24(5):391-8 8017180 - Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1994 Feb;72(1):10-5 20362853 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;36(4):609-16 11821202 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Feb;28(2):235-8 7425052 - Am J Ophthalmol. 1980 Sep;90(3):360-8 19286153 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;147(6):990-6, 996.e1 19491980 - Can J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;44(3):269-73 19337472 - Korean J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;23(1):6-12 11045345 - Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000 Sep;238(9):765-73 12692490 - Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Apr;80(4):320-4 18721707 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Sep;34(9):1483-8 18165089 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Jan;34(1):103-13 17159449 - Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007 Feb;18(1):58-61 19251137 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Mar;35(3):451-8 8778372 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Apr;22(3):362-6 11738911 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Dec;27(12):1961-8 |
References_xml | – volume: 45 start-page: 1665 year: 2004 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref15 publication-title: J Korean Ophthalmol Soc – volume: 36 start-page: 609 year: 2010 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref21 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.044 – volume: 72 start-page: 10 year: 1994 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref2 publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1994.tb02729.x – volume: 35 start-page: 451 year: 2009 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref9 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.11.043 – volume: 27 start-page: 1961 year: 2001 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref16 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01214-7 – volume: 34 start-page: 601 year: 2008 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref3 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.033 – volume: 23 start-page: 6 year: 2009 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref20 publication-title: Korean J Ophthalmol doi: 10.3341/kjo.2009.23.1.6 – volume: 81 start-page: 331 year: 2003 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref18 publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol Scand doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2003.00092.x – volume: 18 start-page: 58 year: 2007 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref6 publication-title: Curr Opin Ophthalmol doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e328011f9bf – volume: 34 start-page: 103 year: 2008 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref13 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.013 – volume: 44 start-page: 1519 year: 2003 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref19 publication-title: J Korean Ophthalmol Soc – volume: 44 start-page: 269 year: 2009 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref7 publication-title: Can J Ophthalmol doi: 10.3129/i09-048 – volume: 37 start-page: 775 year: 2009 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref22 publication-title: Clin Experiment Ophthalmol doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02154.x – volume: 24 start-page: 391 year: 2004 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref11 publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00203.x – volume: 28 start-page: 235 year: 2002 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref14 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01179-8 – volume: 80 start-page: 320 year: 2003 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref10 publication-title: Optom Vis Sci doi: 10.1097/00006324-200304000-00011 – volume: 22 start-page: 362 year: 1996 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref23 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80251-3 – volume: 34 start-page: 1483 year: 2008 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref5 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.05.031 – volume: 238 start-page: 765 year: 2000 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref17 publication-title: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol doi: 10.1007/s004170000188 – volume: 30 start-page: 143 year: 2010 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref12 publication-title: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00701.x – volume: 90 start-page: 360 year: 1980 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref1 publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)74917-7 – volume: 33 start-page: 800 year: 2007 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref4 publication-title: J Cataract Refract Surg doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.030 – volume: 147 start-page: 990 year: 2009 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.1.10_ref8 publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.01.004 – reference: 17466851 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 May;33(5):800-3 – reference: 19286153 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;147(6):990-6, 996.e1 – reference: 17159449 - Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007 Feb;18(1):58-61 – reference: 8017180 - Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1994 Feb;72(1):10-5 – reference: 15315653 - Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004 Sep;24(5):391-8 – reference: 19491980 - Can J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;44(3):269-73 – reference: 11821202 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Feb;28(2):235-8 – reference: 11738911 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Dec;27(12):1961-8 – reference: 7425052 - Am J Ophthalmol. 1980 Sep;90(3):360-8 – reference: 18165089 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Jan;34(1):103-13 – reference: 19251137 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Mar;35(3):451-8 – reference: 11045345 - Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000 Sep;238(9):765-73 – reference: 20444118 - Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Mar;30(2):143-51 – reference: 18721707 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Sep;34(9):1483-8 – reference: 18361982 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Apr;34(4):601-7 – reference: 20362853 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;36(4):609-16 – reference: 19337472 - Korean J Ophthalmol. 2009 Mar;23(1):6-12 – reference: 19878222 - Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;37(8):775-9 – reference: 12859258 - Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003 Aug;81(4):331-5 – reference: 8778372 - J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Apr;22(3):362-6 – reference: 12692490 - Optom Vis Sci. 2003 Apr;80(4):320-4 |
SSID | ssj0061307 |
Score | 2.06333 |
Snippet | To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL).
Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof toric... To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL).PURPOSETo evaluate the accuracy of... Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative keratometers used in cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: Twenty-five eyes received... |
SourceID | nrf pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 10 |
SubjectTerms | Analysis of Variance Astigmatism - complications Astigmatism - surgery Cataract Extraction Female Humans Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods Lenses, Intraocular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Original Prospective Studies Refraction, Ocular Reproducibility of Results Treatment Outcome Visual Acuity 안과학 |
Title | Which Keratometer is Most Reliable for Correcting Astigmatism with Toric Intraocular Lenses? |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22323879 https://www.proquest.com/docview/921147008 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3268162 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001632157 |
Volume | 26 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Korean Journal of Ophthalmology, 2012, 26(1), , pp.10-14 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Li9RAEG7cFcSL-DarDi148ZDZpNPpx0EWEZdVGE8OuwehSfrhZGcm0WQW1n9vVZIdHRn0FEg6KVJVSX3V9SLktROSZZmzsSqTMgZ8q2MllI1BmwJj3pWudxRnn8XZnH-6yC9-l0ePDOz2unY4T2rerqbXP36ewAf_Fj1O-AkfLy-xii9lUyam6RTrrW6DXRKo4zO-jSkgUMbiaZZoFutMsSFoufcJO0bqoG7DPvz5dxrlH3bp9D65NwJK-m7QgAfklq8fkjuzMWT-iHw9X1R2QZfYPLlZY_ILrTq6broNbf2qwsopCsCVWhzTYTEJmhbYeAORbLemuE9L-0YitEL6TZ-3SsFWdb47eUzmpx--vD-Lx5EKsc14lsRKl0yGHNy61MpEKO25y_MgRe4LKa10znEWOC90XioF0MIlhU5DSAumCs_K7Ak5rJvaPyPUM6aZDSXCLp6noQAgCIDBcV4Kz3MbkeMbHho79hvHsRcrA34Hct0A1w1y3TBhUjgbkTfbO74PvTb-sfYViMUsbWWwQTYevzVm2RpwAz4aDM5yGRF6IzQDHw1GQoraN1ed0eD2cgnwJyJPBxluCQJcAhQjdUTkjnS3C5Dc7pW6WvR9uYEBKhXs6P9kn5O7-DJD9vcLcrhpr_xLADebckIO8vh80m8NTHr9_QXIKflk |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which+keratometer+is+most+reliable+for+correcting+astigmatism+with+toric+intraocular+lenses%3F&rft.jtitle=Korean+journal+of+ophthalmology&rft.au=Chang%2C+Minwook&rft.au=Kang%2C+Su-Yeon&rft.au=Kim%2C+Hyo+Myung&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.issn=2092-9382&rft.eissn=2092-9382&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.3341%2Fkjo.2012.26.1.10&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1011-8942&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1011-8942&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1011-8942&client=summon |