Vouvoiement and tutoiement: sociolinguistic reflections

This article offers a critical review of research on the T/V ( tu/vous ) choice in French, and an analysis of this alternation in terms of markedness, variation and change. While there is unique public interest in T/V as a sociolinguistic phenomenon, it is a subject that has paradoxically been under...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of French language studies Vol. 20; no. 2; pp. 127 - 150
Main Author COVENEY, AIDAN
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.07.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0959-2695
1474-0079
DOI10.1017/S0959269509990366

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article offers a critical review of research on the T/V ( tu/vous ) choice in French, and an analysis of this alternation in terms of markedness, variation and change. While there is unique public interest in T/V as a sociolinguistic phenomenon, it is a subject that has paradoxically been under-represented in linguistics and sociolinguistics publications produced in France. Much of the research conducted on the topic has been carried out by scholars based in other countries, and this is characterised by a rich variety of disciplinary approaches. T/V in contemporary French is a non-probabilistic phenomenon and is therefore not a sociolinguistic variable, in the Labovian sense. Considering the various senses of ‘markedness’, discussed by Haspelmath (2006), there is a good case for considering T as the unmarked option, rather than V, as has often been suggested. The long-term historical tendency for French to lose many of its inflections suggests that, at some time in the future, it is quite possible that vouvoiement will all but disappear. Yet there is no sign in France at present of a massive and decisive shift away from V.
Bibliography:PII:S0959269509990366
ark:/67375/6GQ-ZR10LXM1-P
ArticleID:99036
istex:68919AE8F5F3A67100DE38499B2FC77699263D0C
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Literature Review-2
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0959-2695
1474-0079
DOI:10.1017/S0959269509990366