A New Era of Protection Against Disability Discrimination? The ADA Amendments Act of 2008 and “Regarded As” Disabled
Several U.S. Supreme Court rulings have substantially narrowed the coverage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) since its passage in 1990. Congress amended the ADA in 2008 to restore the original congressional intent of providing broad coverage for people with disabilities. This article see...
Saved in:
| Published in | Review of public personnel administration Vol. 33; no. 4; pp. 320 - 339 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Los Angeles, CA
SAGE Publications
01.12.2013
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Several U.S. Supreme Court rulings have substantially narrowed the coverage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) since its passage in 1990. Congress amended the ADA in 2008 to restore the original congressional intent of providing broad coverage for people with disabilities. This article seeks to determine whether the 2008 amendments are a mere technical adjustment of the ADA, or constitute significant legislation in their own right. A review of existing law, resulting regulations, and federal cases reveals that the amendments may promise much but deliver more of the same. Nevertheless, employers are well-advised to renew their efforts to cooperate with applicants and employees with disabilities, if for no other reason than to avoid a costly lawsuit that employers are perhaps now more likely to lose. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Several U.S. Supreme Court rulings have substantially narrowed the coverage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) since its passage in 1990. Congress amended the ADA in 2008 to restore the original congressional intent of providing broad coverage for people with disabilities. This article seeks to determine whether the 2008 amendments are a mere technical adjustment of the ADA, or constitute significant legislation in their own right. A review of existing law, resulting regulations, and federal cases reveals that the amendments may promise much but deliver more of the same. Nevertheless, employers are well-advised to renew their efforts to cooperate with applicants and employees with disabilities, if for no other reason than to avoid a costly lawsuit that employers are perhaps now more likely to lose. Several U.S. Supreme Court rulings have substantially narrowed the coverage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) since its passage in 1990. Congress amended the ADA in 2008 to restore the original congressional intent of providing broad coverage for people with disabilities. This article seeks to determine whether the 2008 amendments are a mere technical adjustment of the ADA, or constitute significant legislation in their own right. A review of existing law, resulting regulations, and federal cases reveals that the amendments may promise much but deliver more of the same. Nevertheless, employers are well-advised to renew their efforts to cooperate with applicants and employees with disabilities, if for no other reason than to avoid a costly lawsuit that employers are perhaps now more likely to lose. [Reprinted with permission of Sage Publications, Inc., copyright holder.] |
| Author | Bradbury, Mark D. Jacobson, Willow S. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Mark D. surname: Bradbury fullname: Bradbury, Mark D. email: bradburymd@appstate.edu – sequence: 2 givenname: Willow S. surname: Jacobson fullname: Jacobson, Willow S. |
| BookMark | eNp9kctKAzEUhoNUsFb3LgNu3IzmOpmuZNB6AVGRLtwNaZKpkWmmJinaXR9EX84nMWNdSEEXOQmc7_9zLrug51pnADjA6BhjIU6QoIwK_IgJEyQv6BboY85JJvjwsQf6XTrr8jtgN4RnhBLHRR-8lfDWvMKRl7Ct4b1vo1HRtg6WU2ldiPDcBjmxjY3L7qm8nVknO-IUjp8MLM9LWM6M0-nEAEsVOx-CUAGl0_Bz9f5gptJro2EZPlcfa7_G6D2wXcsmmP2fewDGF6Px2VV2c3d5fVbeZIoyEjNMpciZyIUcSl3TIalzoxXRE8VYzjVhNU1_FbLWQ5ZrxSQ3ha4nBcc01xNEB-BobTv37cvChFjNUhemaaQz7SJUmBNECSKcJfRwA31uF96l4iosCkypQCkOAFpTyrcheFNX8zQT6ZcVRlW3iWpzE0mSb0iUjd8zjF7a5j9hthYGOTW_qvmL_wKayJsO |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1177_0734371X15587979 crossref_primary_10_3233_JVR_191062 crossref_primary_10_1177_0734371X17744864 crossref_primary_10_1891_2168_6653_28_4_329 |
| Cites_doi | 10.2307/977128 10.1177/0734371X9901900405 10.1177/0734371X11433883 10.1177/009102609402300108 10.2307/977203 10.1177/0734371X0102100105 10.1177/009102600703600202 10.2307/j.ctt7zwb25 10.1177/0734371X02250108 10.1177/027507409802800102 10.1177/009102600002900204 10.2307/976704 10.2307/977574 10.1177/009102600303200108 10.1177/009102600403300204 10.1177/0734371X06291814 10.2307/3110399 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2013 SAGE Publications Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Dec 2013 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 SAGE Publications – notice: Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Dec 2013 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7UB |
| DOI | 10.1177/0734371X12472683 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Worldwide Political Science Abstracts Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Government Law |
| EISSN | 1552-759X |
| EndPage | 339 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 4024497711 10_1177_0734371X12472683 10.1177_0734371X12472683 |
| GeographicLocations | United States--US |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
| GroupedDBID | -TM -~X .2G .2L 01A 09Z 0R~ 123 18M 1XV 1~K 29P 31S 31V 31W 31X 4.4 54M 56W 5VS AABOD AACKU AADIR AADUE AAGGD AAGLT AAJPV AAKTJ AAMFR AANSI AAOYI AAPEO AAQDB AAQXI AARIX AATAA AAWLO ABAWP ABCCA ABCJG ABEIX ABFXH ABHQH ABIDT ABKRH ABPNF ABQKF ABQPY ABQXT ABRHV ABUJY ABYTW ACAEP ACDXX ACFUR ACFZE ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACJER ACLZU ACMJI ACNCT ACOFE ACOXC ACROE ACRPL ACRYD ACSIQ ACUFS ACUIR ADDLC ADEBD ADEIA ADINF ADNMO ADNON ADPEE ADRRZ ADSTG ADTOS ADUKL ADXQA ADYCS AEDXQ AEGGN AEILP AEOBU AESMA AESZF AEUHG AEVPJ AEWDL AEWHI AEXNY AFEET AFKBI AFKRG AFMOU AFQAA AFUIA AFWMB AGCSZ AGDVU AGKLV AGNHF AGNWV AGQPQ AGWNL AHDMH AHHFK AHWHD AJUZI AKNUK AKVCP ALFTD ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALNCK ANDLU ARTOV ASPBG AUTPY AUVAJ AVWKF AYPQM AZFZN B8O B8S B8T B8Z BDZRT BKOMP BMVBW BPACV BYIEH CAG CBRKF CCGJY CEADM COF CS3 DD0 DD~ DG~ DOPDO DV7 DV8 EBS EJD FAC FAS FEDTE FHBDP FJW GROUPED_SAGE_PREMIER_JOURNAL_COLLECTION H13 HF~ HVGLF HZ~ J8X LGEZI LOTEE LPU MS~ N9A NADUK NXXTH O9- OHT P.B P2P PQQKQ Q1R Q7O Q7P Q7X ROL RWL RXW S01 SASJQ SAUOL SBI SCNPE SFB SFC SFI SFK SFT SGP SGU SGV SHB SHF SHM SPJ SPP SQCSI SSDHQ TAE TN5 U5U XOL YF5 ZCG ZPLXX ZPPRI ~32 AAYXX ACCVC AJGYC AMNSR CITATION 7UB AAPII AJHME AJVBE |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-13a764767a9adf392f6edc2dbc4465d24f30088afd946dc4a5e8dfb85136db03 |
| ISSN | 0734-371X |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 14:21:59 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 07:23:47 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 05:31:50 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:55:35 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:29:54 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 4 |
| Keywords | affirmative action and equal employment opportunity legal/constitutional issues diversity discrimination health issues and personnel |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c342t-13a764767a9adf392f6edc2dbc4465d24f30088afd946dc4a5e8dfb85136db03 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| PQID | 1781337081 |
| PQPubID | 38215 |
| PageCount | 20 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1520320254 proquest_journals_1781337081 crossref_primary_10_1177_0734371X12472683 crossref_citationtrail_10_1177_0734371X12472683 sage_journals_10_1177_0734371X12472683 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20131200 2013-12-00 20131201 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-12-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2013 text: 20131200 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Los Angeles, CA |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Los Angeles, CA – name: Columbia |
| PublicationTitle | Review of public personnel administration |
| PublicationYear | 2013 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: SAGE Publications – name: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC |
| References | Jenero, Schreiber 2000; 26 Ring 2006; 20 Rush 2012; 32 Bradbury 2007; 27 Condrey, Brudney 1998; 28 Mayerson 1997; 42 2000; 9 Slack 1995; 55 Massengill 2004; 33 Donovan 2005; 50 Koenig 1998; 58 Bishop, Jones 1993; 53 Riccucci 2003; 23 Colker 2001; 62 Crampton, Hodge 2003; 32 Andrews 2006; 110 Ozawa 2007; 2007 Dudley 1999; 7 Kellough 2000; 29 Warren 2000; 38 Kim 2007; 36 Mish 1998; 1 Rosenthal 2006; 36 Kuykendall, Lindquist 2001; 21 McFarlin 2005; 49 Cozzetto 1994; 23 Lee 1999; 19 Danaher 2006; 8 Crain 2005; 74 Slack 1996; 56 Lewis, Allee 1992; 52 Andrews J. D. (bibr3-0734371X12472683) 2006; 110 bibr43-0734371X12472683 bibr51-0734371X12472683 bibr27-0734371X12472683 bibr5-0734371X12472683 bibr26-0734371X12472683 McFarlin T. J. (bibr35-0734371X12472683) 2005; 49 bibr52-0734371X12472683 bibr44-0734371X12472683 bibr18-0734371X12472683 bibr42-0734371X12472683 Ozawa A. (bibr40-0734371X12472683) 2007; 2007 bibr4-0734371X12472683 Dudley A. (bibr20-0734371X12472683) 1999; 7 Ring K. J. (bibr45-0734371X12472683) 2006; 20 Jenero K. A. (bibr25-0734371X12472683) 2000; 26 bibr34-0734371X12472683 bibr62-0734371X12472683 bibr2-0734371X12472683 bibr7-0734371X12472683 bibr54-0734371X12472683 Colker R. (bibr12-0734371X12472683) 2001; 62 bibr46-0734371X12472683 bibr36-0734371X12472683 bibr23-0734371X12472683 bibr10-0734371X12472683 bibr28-0734371X12472683 Switzer J. V. (bibr56-0734371X12472683) 2003 bibr49-0734371X12472683 bibr30-0734371X12472683 Donovan M. E. (bibr19-0734371X12472683) 2005; 50 Ray, J. C. Esq., & Pennington, S. S. Esq (bibr41-0734371X12472683) 2000; 9 bibr13-0734371X12472683 bibr9-0734371X12472683 bibr14-0734371X12472683 bibr39-0734371X12472683 bibr57-0734371X12472683 bibr22-0734371X12472683 bibr31-0734371X12472683 U.S. MSPB (bibr59-0734371X12472683) 2011 bibr48-0734371X12472683 bibr55-0734371X12472683 Mish R. M. (bibr37-0734371X12472683) 1998; 1 bibr21-0734371X12472683 Rosenthal L. D. (bibr47-0734371X12472683) 2006; 36 Danaher M. G. (bibr17-0734371X12472683) 2006; 8 bibr8-0734371X12472683 bibr38-0734371X12472683 bibr24-0734371X12472683 bibr29-0734371X12472683 bibr16-0734371X12472683 bibr11-0734371X12472683 bibr61-0734371X12472683 bibr6-0734371X12472683 Crain C. A. (bibr15-0734371X12472683) 2005; 74 bibr50-0734371X12472683 bibr1-0734371X12472683 bibr53-0734371X12472683 bibr58-0734371X12472683 Mayerson A. B. (bibr33-0734371X12472683) 1997; 42 Warren B. J. (bibr60-0734371X12472683) 2000; 38 bibr32-0734371X12472683 |
| References_xml | – volume: 53 start-page: 121 year: 1993 end-page: 128 article-title: Implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: Assessing the variables of success publication-title: Public Administration Review – volume: 9 start-page: 333 year: 2000 article-title: The Americans with Disabilities Act—Past present and future: Developing law over a decade: The substantial limitation approach to defining disability: Why does it create an insurmountable barrier to individuals who are regarded as disabled? publication-title: Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review – volume: 38 start-page: 1143 year: 2000 article-title: When determining whether an ADA claimant is disabled, the claimant’s impairment must be considered in light of corrective measures, and failure to meet DOT regulations does not establish that the claimant was regarded as disabled: publication-title: Duquesne University Law Review – volume: 20 start-page: 311 year: 2006 article-title: Disabling the split: Should reasonable accommodations be provided to “regarded as” disabled individuals under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)? publication-title: Washington University Journal of Law & Policy – volume: 49 start-page: 927 year: 2005 article-title: If they ask for a stool . . . Recognizing reasonable accommodation for employees “regarded as” disabled publication-title: Saint Louis University Law Journal – volume: 23 start-page: 3 year: 2003 end-page: 22 article-title: The U.S. supreme court’s new federalism and its impact on antidiscrimination legislation publication-title: Review of Public Personnel Administration – volume: 36 start-page: 895 year: 2006 article-title: Reasonable accommodations for individuals regarded as having disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act? Why “no” should not be the answer publication-title: Seton Hall Law Review – volume: 58 start-page: 471 year: 1998 end-page: 473 article-title: The Americans with Disabilities Act: Who isn’t covered? publication-title: Public Administration Review – volume: 52 start-page: 389 year: 1992 end-page: 397 article-title: The impact of disabilities on federal career success publication-title: Public Administration Review – volume: 2007 start-page: 313 year: 2007 article-title: Reasonable accommodation for those “regarded as” disabled: Why requiring it will create positive incentives for employees publication-title: Columbia Business Law Review – volume: 27 start-page: 1 year: 2007 end-page: 14 article-title: The legal and managerial challenge of obesity as a disability: Evidence from the federal courts publication-title: Review of Public Personnel Administration – volume: 56 start-page: 159 year: 1996 end-page: 167 article-title: Workplace preparedness and the Americans with Disabilities Act: Lessons from municipal governments’ management of HIV/AIDS publication-title: Public Administration Review – volume: 74 start-page: 167 year: 2005 article-title: The struggle for reasonable accommodation for “regarded as” disabled individuals publication-title: University of Cincinnati Law Review – volume: 7 start-page: 389 year: 1999 article-title: Rights to reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act for “regarded as” disabled individuals publication-title: George Mason Law Review – volume: 36 start-page: 115 issue: 2 year: 2007 end-page: 125 article-title: Federal employees with disabilities with regards to occupation, race, and gender publication-title: Public Personnel Management – volume: 21 start-page: 65 year: 2001 end-page: 69 article-title: : Implications for public personnel management publication-title: Review of Public Personnel Administration – volume: 1 start-page: 155 year: 1998 article-title: “Regards as disabled” claims under the ADA: Safety net or catch-all? publication-title: University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor & Employment Law – volume: 23 start-page: 105 issue: 1 year: 1994 end-page: 116 article-title: Implications of the ADA for state and local government: Judicial activism reincarnated publication-title: Public Personnel Management – volume: 8 start-page: 2 year: 2006 article-title: To be regarded as disabled an employee must be perceived as unable to perform a variety of jobs publication-title: Lawyers Journal – volume: 50 start-page: 1213 year: 2005 article-title: Issues in the third circuit: How bizarre? The third circuit’s analysis of the requirement of reasonable accommodation for “regarded as” disabled employees under the ADA in publication-title: Villanova Law Review – volume: 110 start-page: 977 year: 2006 article-title: Reconciling the split: Affording reasonable accommodations to employees “regarded as” disabled under the ADA—An exercise in statutory interpretation publication-title: Penn State Law Review – volume: 32 start-page: 143 issue: 1 year: 2003 end-page: 154 article-title: The ADA and disability accommodations publication-title: Public Personnel Management – volume: 26 start-page: 99 issue: 1 year: 2000 end-page: 109 article-title: The next generation of ADA claims: The “regarded as” prong of the definition of disability publication-title: Employee Relations Law Journal – volume: 42 start-page: 587 year: 1997 article-title: Defining the parameters of coverage under the Americans with Disabilities Act: Who is “an individual with disability?” Article: Restoring regard for the “regarded as” prong: Giving effect to congressional intent publication-title: Villanova Law Review – volume: 28 start-page: 26 year: 1998 end-page: 42 article-title: The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: Assessing its implementation in America’s largest cities publication-title: American Review of Public Administration – volume: 33 start-page: 181 year: 2004 end-page: 199 article-title: How much better are you? Impairments, mitigating measures and the determination of disability publication-title: Public Personnel Management – volume: 29 start-page: 211 year: 2000 end-page: 224 article-title: The American with Disabilities Act: A note on personnel policy impacts in state government publication-title: Public Personnel Review – volume: 32 start-page: 75 year: 2012 end-page: 86 article-title: Amending the Americans with Disabilities Act: Shifting equal employment opportunity obligations in public human resource management publication-title: Review of Public Personnel Administration – volume: 55 start-page: 365 year: 1995 end-page: 370 article-title: The Americans with Disabilities Act and the workplace: Management’s responsibilities in AIDS-related situations publication-title: Public Administration Review – volume: 62 start-page: 239 year: 2001 end-page: 283 article-title: Winning and losing under the Americans with Disabilities Act publication-title: Ohio State Law Journal – volume: 19 start-page: 45 year: 1999 end-page: 64 article-title: The Rehabilitation Act and federal employment: The court’s application of the law publication-title: Review of Public Personnel Administration – ident: bibr54-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr2-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr52-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.2307/977128 – ident: bibr21-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr7-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr30-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.1177/0734371X9901900405 – volume: 38 start-page: 1143 year: 2000 ident: bibr60-0734371X12472683 publication-title: Duquesne University Law Review – ident: bibr48-0734371X12472683 – volume: 8 start-page: 2 year: 2006 ident: bibr17-0734371X12472683 publication-title: Lawyers Journal – ident: bibr49-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.1177/0734371X11433883 – volume: 1 start-page: 155 year: 1998 ident: bibr37-0734371X12472683 publication-title: University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor & Employment Law – ident: bibr14-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.1177/009102609402300108 – volume: 7 start-page: 389 year: 1999 ident: bibr20-0734371X12472683 publication-title: George Mason Law Review – volume: 2007 start-page: 313 year: 2007 ident: bibr40-0734371X12472683 publication-title: Columbia Business Law Review – ident: bibr53-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.2307/977203 – volume: 42 start-page: 587 year: 1997 ident: bibr33-0734371X12472683 publication-title: Villanova Law Review – ident: bibr29-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.1177/0734371X0102100105 – ident: bibr58-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr6-0734371X12472683 – volume: 74 start-page: 167 year: 2005 ident: bibr15-0734371X12472683 publication-title: University of Cincinnati Law Review – ident: bibr61-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr1-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr27-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.1177/009102600703600202 – ident: bibr44-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr22-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr36-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.2307/j.ctt7zwb25 – ident: bibr43-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.1177/0734371X02250108 – ident: bibr13-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.1177/027507409802800102 – ident: bibr23-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr62-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr26-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.1177/009102600002900204 – volume: 62 start-page: 239 year: 2001 ident: bibr12-0734371X12472683 publication-title: Ohio State Law Journal – ident: bibr8-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.2307/976704 – ident: bibr18-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr28-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.2307/977574 – volume: 26 start-page: 99 issue: 1 year: 2000 ident: bibr25-0734371X12472683 publication-title: Employee Relations Law Journal – volume: 9 start-page: 333 year: 2000 ident: bibr41-0734371X12472683 publication-title: Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review – ident: bibr5-0734371X12472683 – volume: 110 start-page: 977 year: 2006 ident: bibr3-0734371X12472683 publication-title: Penn State Law Review – ident: bibr24-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr46-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr57-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr50-0734371X12472683 – volume-title: Issues of merit, April 2011 year: 2011 ident: bibr59-0734371X12472683 – volume: 36 start-page: 895 year: 2006 ident: bibr47-0734371X12472683 publication-title: Seton Hall Law Review – ident: bibr55-0734371X12472683 – volume: 50 start-page: 1213 year: 2005 ident: bibr19-0734371X12472683 publication-title: Villanova Law Review – volume: 49 start-page: 927 year: 2005 ident: bibr35-0734371X12472683 publication-title: Saint Louis University Law Journal – volume: 20 start-page: 311 year: 2006 ident: bibr45-0734371X12472683 publication-title: Washington University Journal of Law & Policy – ident: bibr11-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr38-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr16-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.1177/009102600303200108 – ident: bibr32-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.1177/009102600403300204 – ident: bibr39-0734371X12472683 – volume-title: Disabled rights: American disability policy and the fight for equality year: 2003 ident: bibr56-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr42-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr10-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.1177/0734371X06291814 – ident: bibr34-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr9-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr51-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr4-0734371X12472683 – ident: bibr31-0734371X12472683 doi: 10.2307/3110399 |
| SSID | ssj0012457 |
| Score | 1.9344099 |
| Snippet | Several U.S. Supreme Court rulings have substantially narrowed the coverage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) since its passage in 1990. Congress... |
| SourceID | proquest crossref sage |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 320 |
| SubjectTerms | Amendments Americans with Disabilities Act 1990-US Compliance Cooperation Discrimination Employers Employment discrimination Law Legal studies Legislation Legislative Bodies Legislatures Litigation Regulation Supreme Court decisions Supreme Courts Workers with disabilities |
| Title | A New Era of Protection Against Disability Discrimination? The ADA Amendments Act of 2008 and “Regarded As” Disabled |
| URI | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0734371X12472683 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1781337081 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1520320254 |
| Volume | 33 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9tAEF7c5JJL6ZM6TcsWSqEYOfLuSmudyhInhEJKm7rgnsy-lIuRQyzTxyk_pIX-tvySzmr1dJPS9CKELM3ank-zszsz3yD0MpIJl9rEgU1iFriOxsFYaTCGsBQjKdEkVW5r4ORdfPyJvZ1Fs17vVytraZ2rof5-bV3J_2gVroFeXZXsLTRbC4ULcA76hSNoGI7_pGNRpCceXsgik80zLjh1ijNY769yR63pabi_uVPtO3j5bI6jItdCTISL2WTGF7oJXy_pkhWKoEKVCXFwas8ASeCbilV1beKlL7qdPk_rSpiSP_u88OgzuxjIDk3vdbF8Vzc0mAzrpB4w1lV3c7cttPwy-Dhs71KMaCvjwxszThkYs6I9Dsw7pbGNwLuPklnbGntajBJ1rGVaKQlbszT1FEh_TgBFCNqN5gYD54WT2HfK6XJtb8yBdWbiqKI_35BwB20TWIiAJd0Wn99_OKkjVYR5Ntnq9zWh8P1NGV3Xp1nPtFIIC69meg_dLZcjWHhs3Uc9mz1AO00D5ofoq8AAMgwgw8sUNyDDJchwAzLcBdkbDBDDADHcQAwDxJwcBzEMEMNXlz8qcGGxurr8iStYPULTo8PpwXFQtusINGUkD0ZU8pjxmMtEmhT87jS2RhOjtCPlM4SlFGSPZWoSFhvNZGTHJlXg8tPYqJA-RlvZMrNPELZaam24pZq6bg-h5MrISCehilKpjO6j_eqPnOuSyt51VFnMb1JfH72unzj3NC5_uXev0s28fNlX8xEfjyjl4ED30Yv6YzDFLr4mM7tcwz0RCQGlJGJ99MrptPX4DWPt3uJ7PUU7zZu1h7byi7V9Bh5xrp6XoPwN4K2sjA |
| linkProvider | SAGE Publications |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V3NbtQwEB6V7YFe-EdsKWAkQOKQdtd27OSAkMW22tJuVdAiLafIf6kQVbbqZgXl1AeBO6_Ca_RJGG-S3VIE4tIDt0gZO85kxjOOx98H8CTWqdTWicingkeB0ThKjMXJEJdiNKeW5ib8Ghjsif47_noUj5bge3MWptbgZD2UVeGIZpP13LsDUpJknMnuCOOSpCJpeKt3_MknXK1NXmz38NM-pXRrc_iqH9WEApFlnAbadS0Fl0LqVLscM4NceGepMzbAhjnKc4YhMdG5S7lwluvYJy43mJQw4UyHYbdXYDkJGJwtWFbv998M5jsWlFeooji8KIxvsSX625B_DYGLvPZcKdksum1dhx-NXqqilo_r0xJV8uUCZOT_oLgbcK1OsYmqfOImLPniFqwsSIVvw2dFcHInm8eajHOyX0FVoIESdaA_YL5MejXycHkSLm1FfRYkXhL0K6J6iijsys3OBxJly9BPqPEgunDk7PTrW3-ArucdUZOz029Vf4fe3YHhZbz4XWgV48LfA-KtttZJzywLDAYdLY3TsU07Js61cbYNG41RZLaGZw8sIYdZt0Fkv_AB2_B83uKogib5i-xaY2dZYylZVyZdxiQmhW14PL-N00vYM9KFH09RJqYdRgNkQhueBdM61_wPz1r9V8FHcLU_HOxmu9t7O_dhhQaikVmh0Bq0yuOpf4DpXmke1p5GILtkE_0Jgb5ZNw |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V3NbtQwEB6VVkK9QPkTCy0YCZA4pLtrO3FyqJDFdtVSWi2oSMsp8m-FqLJVNysopz5IeQNehZfokzDeJLulCMSlB26RMnYmzoxnHI-_D-BprDKhjE0ilyU8CozGUaoNToa4FKOeGup1-DWwu5dsveevh_FwAb43Z2HqERyvh7Iq1Gg6WQfvPrK-Xe8xttEsORPdIcYmQZO04a7ecSefccU23tju4ed9Rml_c__VVlSTCkSGcRqo15VIuEiEypT1mB34xFlDrTYBOsxS7hmGxVR5m_HEGq5il1qvMTFhidUdht1egyUMiyEdW5IfBm93Z7sWlFfIoqheFPSbb4v-pvKvYXCe214oJ5tGuP5N-NGMTVXY8ml9UuKwfL0EG_m_DN4K3KhTbSIr37gFC664DctzcuE78EUSnOTJ5rEiI08GFWQFGiqRB-oj5s2kVyMQlyfh0lQUaEHiJUH_IrInicSu7PScIJGmDP2EWg-iCkvOT8_euQN0QWeJHJ-ffqv6O3T2LuxfxYvfg8ViVLj7QJxRxljhmGGByaCjhLYqNllHx15pa1rQbgwjNzVMe2ALOcy7DTL7pQ_YghezFkcVRMlfZFcbW8sba8m7Iu0yJjA5bMGT2W2cZsLekSrcaIIyMe0wGqATWvA8mNeF5n941oN_FXwM1we9fv5me2_nISzTwDcyrRdahcXyeOLWMOsr9aPa2QjkV2yhPwHjtlus |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+New+Era+of+Protection+Against+Disability+Discrimination%3F+The+ADA+Amendments+Act+of+2008+and+%E2%80%9CRegarded+As%E2%80%9D+Disabled&rft.jtitle=Review+of+public+personnel+administration&rft.au=Bradbury%2C+Mark+D.&rft.au=Jacobson%2C+Willow+S.&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.issn=0734-371X&rft.eissn=1552-759X&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=320&rft.epage=339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F0734371X12472683&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1177_0734371X12472683 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0734-371X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0734-371X&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0734-371X&client=summon |