A Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Lapatinib in Combination with Letrozole in Patients with Advanced Cancer
Purpose: The main objectives of this phase I and pharmacokinetic, open-label study were to determine the optimally tolerated regimen (OTR), safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity of lapatinib in combination with letrozole in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Experimental Design: Pa...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical cancer research Vol. 14; no. 14; pp. 4484 - 4490 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Association for Cancer Research
15.07.2008
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose: The main objectives of this phase I and pharmacokinetic, open-label study were to determine the optimally tolerated regimen
(OTR), safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity of lapatinib in combination with letrozole in patients with advanced
solid malignancies.
Experimental Design: Patients with advanced breast cancer with immunohistochemically detectable estrogen or progesterone receptors or other cancers
were eligible. Doses of lapatinib were escalated in cohorts of three subjects from 1,250 to a maximum of 1,500 mg/d based
on dose-limiting toxicities in the first treatment cycle. The letrozole dose was fixed at 2.5 mg/d. Additional patients were
enrolled at the OTR dose level to further evaluate safety and for pharmacokinetic analyses.
Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in the study: 12 in the dose-escalation group, 7 in the OTR safety group, and 20 in the
pharmacokinetic group. The OTR dose level was identified as 1,500 mg/d lapatinib and 2.5 mg/d letrozole. The most common (>25%
of patients) drug-related adverse events were diarrhea (77%), rash (62%), nausea (46%), and fatigue (26%). No significant
differences were observed in the pharmacokinetic variables ( C max and AUC) of lapatinib and letrozole when coadministered compared with single-agent administration. One patient with endometrial
cancer had a confirmed partial response.
Conclusions: Clinically relevant doses of lapatinib in combination with letrozole were well tolerated and did not result in a pharmacokinetic
interaction, and clinical antitumor activity was observed. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose: The main objectives of this phase I and pharmacokinetic, open-label study were to determine the optimally tolerated regimen
(OTR), safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity of lapatinib in combination with letrozole in patients with advanced
solid malignancies.
Experimental Design: Patients with advanced breast cancer with immunohistochemically detectable estrogen or progesterone receptors or other cancers
were eligible. Doses of lapatinib were escalated in cohorts of three subjects from 1,250 to a maximum of 1,500 mg/d based
on dose-limiting toxicities in the first treatment cycle. The letrozole dose was fixed at 2.5 mg/d. Additional patients were
enrolled at the OTR dose level to further evaluate safety and for pharmacokinetic analyses.
Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in the study: 12 in the dose-escalation group, 7 in the OTR safety group, and 20 in the
pharmacokinetic group. The OTR dose level was identified as 1,500 mg/d lapatinib and 2.5 mg/d letrozole. The most common (>25%
of patients) drug-related adverse events were diarrhea (77%), rash (62%), nausea (46%), and fatigue (26%). No significant
differences were observed in the pharmacokinetic variables ( C max and AUC) of lapatinib and letrozole when coadministered compared with single-agent administration. One patient with endometrial
cancer had a confirmed partial response.
Conclusions: Clinically relevant doses of lapatinib in combination with letrozole were well tolerated and did not result in a pharmacokinetic
interaction, and clinical antitumor activity was observed. The main objectives of this phase I and pharmacokinetic, open-label study were to determine the optimally tolerated regimen (OTR), safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity of lapatinib in combination with letrozole in patients with advanced solid malignancies.PURPOSEThe main objectives of this phase I and pharmacokinetic, open-label study were to determine the optimally tolerated regimen (OTR), safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity of lapatinib in combination with letrozole in patients with advanced solid malignancies.Patients with advanced breast cancer with immunohistochemically detectable estrogen or progesterone receptors or other cancers were eligible. Doses of lapatinib were escalated in cohorts of three subjects from 1,250 to a maximum of 1,500 mg/d based on dose-limiting toxicities in the first treatment cycle. The letrozole dose was fixed at 2.5 mg/d. Additional patients were enrolled at the OTR dose level to further evaluate safety and for pharmacokinetic analyses.EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNPatients with advanced breast cancer with immunohistochemically detectable estrogen or progesterone receptors or other cancers were eligible. Doses of lapatinib were escalated in cohorts of three subjects from 1,250 to a maximum of 1,500 mg/d based on dose-limiting toxicities in the first treatment cycle. The letrozole dose was fixed at 2.5 mg/d. Additional patients were enrolled at the OTR dose level to further evaluate safety and for pharmacokinetic analyses.Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in the study: 12 in the dose-escalation group, 7 in the OTR safety group, and 20 in the pharmacokinetic group. The OTR dose level was identified as 1,500 mg/d lapatinib and 2.5 mg/d letrozole. The most common (>25% of patients) drug-related adverse events were diarrhea (77%), rash (62%), nausea (46%), and fatigue (26%). No significant differences were observed in the pharmacokinetic variables (C(max) and AUC) of lapatinib and letrozole when coadministered compared with single-agent administration. One patient with endometrial cancer had a confirmed partial response.RESULTSThirty-nine patients were enrolled in the study: 12 in the dose-escalation group, 7 in the OTR safety group, and 20 in the pharmacokinetic group. The OTR dose level was identified as 1,500 mg/d lapatinib and 2.5 mg/d letrozole. The most common (>25% of patients) drug-related adverse events were diarrhea (77%), rash (62%), nausea (46%), and fatigue (26%). No significant differences were observed in the pharmacokinetic variables (C(max) and AUC) of lapatinib and letrozole when coadministered compared with single-agent administration. One patient with endometrial cancer had a confirmed partial response.Clinically relevant doses of lapatinib in combination with letrozole were well tolerated and did not result in a pharmacokinetic interaction, and clinical antitumor activity was observed.CONCLUSIONSClinically relevant doses of lapatinib in combination with letrozole were well tolerated and did not result in a pharmacokinetic interaction, and clinical antitumor activity was observed. The main objectives of this phase I and pharmacokinetic, open-label study were to determine the optimally tolerated regimen (OTR), safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity of lapatinib in combination with letrozole in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Patients with advanced breast cancer with immunohistochemically detectable estrogen or progesterone receptors or other cancers were eligible. Doses of lapatinib were escalated in cohorts of three subjects from 1,250 to a maximum of 1,500 mg/d based on dose-limiting toxicities in the first treatment cycle. The letrozole dose was fixed at 2.5 mg/d. Additional patients were enrolled at the OTR dose level to further evaluate safety and for pharmacokinetic analyses. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in the study: 12 in the dose-escalation group, 7 in the OTR safety group, and 20 in the pharmacokinetic group. The OTR dose level was identified as 1,500 mg/d lapatinib and 2.5 mg/d letrozole. The most common (>25% of patients) drug-related adverse events were diarrhea (77%), rash (62%), nausea (46%), and fatigue (26%). No significant differences were observed in the pharmacokinetic variables (C(max) and AUC) of lapatinib and letrozole when coadministered compared with single-agent administration. One patient with endometrial cancer had a confirmed partial response. Clinically relevant doses of lapatinib in combination with letrozole were well tolerated and did not result in a pharmacokinetic interaction, and clinical antitumor activity was observed. Purpose: The main objectives of this phase I and pharmacokinetic, open-label study were to determine the optimally tolerated regimen (OTR), safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity of lapatinib in combination with letrozole in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced breast cancer with immunohistochemically detectable estrogen or progesterone receptors or other cancers were eligible. Doses of lapatinib were escalated in cohorts of three subjects from 1,250 to a maximum of 1,500 mg/d based on dose-limiting toxicities in the first treatment cycle. The letrozole dose was fixed at 2.5 mg/d. Additional patients were enrolled at the OTR dose level to further evaluate safety and for pharmacokinetic analyses. Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in the study: 12 in the dose-escalation group, 7 in the OTR safety group, and 20 in the pharmacokinetic group. The OTR dose level was identified as 1,500 mg/d lapatinib and 2.5 mg/d letrozole. The most common (>25% of patients) drug-related adverse events were diarrhea (77%), rash (62%), nausea (46%), and fatigue (26%). No significant differences were observed in the pharmacokinetic variables (Cmax and AUC) of lapatinib and letrozole when coadministered compared with single-agent administration. One patient with endometrial cancer had a confirmed partial response. Conclusions: Clinically relevant doses of lapatinib in combination with letrozole were well tolerated and did not result in a pharmacokinetic interaction, and clinical antitumor activity was observed. |
Author | Meg Gale Mary E. Cianfrocca Nicholas Murray Eric K. Rowinsky Quincy S.C. Chu Jill Loftiss Lori J. Goldstein Elaine Paul Kevin M. Koch Nikita Arya Ronald A. Fleming Lini Pandite |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Quincy S.C. surname: Chu fullname: Chu, Quincy S.C. – sequence: 2 givenname: Mary E. surname: Cianfrocca fullname: Cianfrocca, Mary E. – sequence: 3 givenname: Lori J. surname: Goldstein fullname: Goldstein, Lori J. – sequence: 4 givenname: Meg surname: Gale fullname: Gale, Meg – sequence: 5 givenname: Nicholas surname: Murray fullname: Murray, Nicholas – sequence: 6 givenname: Jill surname: Loftiss fullname: Loftiss, Jill – sequence: 7 givenname: Nikita surname: Arya fullname: Arya, Nikita – sequence: 8 givenname: Kevin M. surname: Koch fullname: Koch, Kevin M. – sequence: 9 givenname: Lini surname: Pandite fullname: Pandite, Lini – sequence: 10 givenname: Ronald A. surname: Fleming fullname: Fleming, Ronald A. – sequence: 11 givenname: Elaine surname: Paul fullname: Paul, Elaine – sequence: 12 givenname: Eric K. surname: Rowinsky fullname: Rowinsky, Eric K. |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18628463$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkUuLFDEUhYOMOA_9CUpWgosak8qzcdUUPgYaHHysQ5K6ZUWrkjZJO4y_3qrpGQQ3QuDecL5zF-eco5OYIiD0nJJLSoV-TYnSDeGsvey6Tw1RDedUPUJnVAjVsFaKk2V_YE7ReSnfCaGcEv4EnVItW80lO0Npi69HWwBfYRv7dc-z9elHiFCDx5_rob_FacA7u7c1xOBwiLhLswtx-aeIb0Id8Q5qTr_TBKt6vQgQazlK2_6XjR563K0jP0WPBzsVeHY_L9DXd2-_dB-a3cf3V91213jGaW2E9ERuhHXcEd1bqq1U0oneOWJBDxtGB-mo1GLTtjBwyrRQg2q96hVjrWbsAr083t3n9PMApZo5FA_TZCOkQzFyOSE4Uwv44h48uBl6s89htvnWPES0AOII-JxKyTD8RYhZqzBrzGaN2SxVGKLMWsXie_OPz4d6l1nNNkz_db86usfwbbwJGYy_yy9DAZv9aChfH-easz81CZwj |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1517_13543780903373343 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0305_7372_10_70024_4 crossref_primary_10_1634_theoncologist_2013_0217 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10928_012_9295_8 crossref_primary_10_1097_FTD_0000000000000357 crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_2009_23_3734 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10911_008_9107_3 crossref_primary_10_1172_jci_insight_152714 crossref_primary_10_2165_11204550_000000000_00000 crossref_primary_10_4137_BCBCR_S6374 crossref_primary_10_1586_era_09_124 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drudis_2014_09_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oraloncology_2011_03_028 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbcan_2008_08_003 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13058_019_1152_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ctrv_2008_09_003 crossref_primary_10_6000_1929_2279_2012_01_01_14 crossref_primary_10_4137_CMT_S52 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hoc_2013_05_007 crossref_primary_10_1517_14740338_2011_533168 crossref_primary_10_15406_jcpcr_2017_08_00298 crossref_primary_10_2165_11203240_000000000_00000 crossref_primary_10_1185_03007995_2013_807232 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12325_011_0075_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40262_014_0137_2 crossref_primary_10_2165_11587020_000000000_00000 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tranon_2016_01_002 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers12102751 crossref_primary_10_1517_17425255_2010_506873 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinthera_2009_11_029 crossref_primary_10_2217_thy_09_25 crossref_primary_10_1039_D3AN02235H crossref_primary_10_1002_slct_202101367 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13277_016_5179_7 crossref_primary_10_1124_dmd_121_000534 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcph_937 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina60122012 crossref_primary_10_14712_23362936_2021_22 crossref_primary_10_1186_bcr2572 crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_2010_28_4687 crossref_primary_10_1634_theoncologist_2009_0240 crossref_primary_10_1111_fcp_12069 crossref_primary_10_1097_CAD_0b013e3283645e1a crossref_primary_10_1016_j_critrevonc_2013_08_007 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41523_023_00533_2 crossref_primary_10_1634_theoncologist_2012_0414 |
Cites_doi | 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.004313 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1168 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.9.2639 10.1002/rcm.1327 10.1038/nrc1609 10.1016/1040-8428(94)00144-I 10.1093/jnci/djh166 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-031212 10.1053/sonc.2002.31522 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.014 10.1056/NEJMoa052258 10.1634/theoncologist.9-suppl_3-10 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0399 10.1136/jcp.38.11.1225 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.114 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.18.3808 10.2165/00003495-200464110-00005 10.1056/NEJMoa064320 10.1128/mcb.9.3.1165-1172.1989 10.1210/en.2003-0705 10.1007/s10549-006-9307-8 10.1677/erc.0.0060373 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00233-7 10.1053/sonc.2002.31525 10.1200/JCO.2005.16.584 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2125 10.1186/bcr1606 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.194 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.719 10.1007/s002800000270 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 10.1126/science.3798106 10.1016/S0065-230X(08)60784-8 10.1200/JCO.2002.03.038 10.1158/1078-0432.889s.11.2 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90801-K 10.1093/jnci/90.11.824 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70176-5 10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.3006 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4417 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1557-3265 |
EndPage | 4490 |
ExternalDocumentID | 18628463 10_1158_1078_0432_CCR_07_4417 14_14_4484 |
Genre | Multicenter Study Clinical Trial, Phase I Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | - 08R 29B 2WC 34G 39C 3O- 4H- 53G 55 5GY 5RE 5VS AAPBV ABFLS ABOCM ACIWK ACPRK ADACO ADBBV ADBIT AENEX AETEA AFFNX AFRAH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL C1A CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD F5P FH7 FRP GX1 H13 H~9 IH2 KQ8 L7B LSO MVM O0- OHT OK1 P0W P2P RCR RHF RHI RNS SJN UDS VH1 W2D WOQ X7M XFK XJT ZA5 ZCG --- .55 18M 2FS 6J9 AAFWJ AAJMC AAYXX ACGFO ACSVP ADCOW AFHIN AFOSN AFUMD AI. BR6 BTFSW CITATION QTD TR2 W8F YKV CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-56c0695ab4b08da18a676b5dbb0ae8f931f6b1685922ef413857f72c7d7332833 |
ISSN | 1078-0432 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 09:56:13 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:02:57 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:10:38 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:06:15 EDT 2025 Fri Jan 15 19:23:40 EST 2021 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 14 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c341t-56c0695ab4b08da18a676b5dbb0ae8f931f6b1685922ef413857f72c7d7332833 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 18628463 |
PQID | 69315437 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_69315437 pubmed_primary_18628463 crossref_primary_10_1158_1078_0432_CCR_07_4417 crossref_citationtrail_10_1158_1078_0432_CCR_07_4417 highwire_cancerresearch_14_14_4484 |
ProviderPackageCode | RHF RHI CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20080715 2008-07-15 2008-Jul-15 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2008-07-15 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2008 text: 20080715 day: 15 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Clinical cancer research |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Clin Cancer Res |
PublicationYear | 2008 |
Publisher | American Association for Cancer Research |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Association for Cancer Research |
References | 2022061021361142100_B27 2022061021361142100_B28 2022061021361142100_B25 2022061021361142100_B9 2022061021361142100_B26 2022061021361142100_B23 2022061021361142100_B24 2022061021361142100_B21 2022061021361142100_B22 2022061021361142100_B4 2022061021361142100_B3 2022061021361142100_B2 2022061021361142100_B1 2022061021361142100_B8 2022061021361142100_B7 2022061021361142100_B6 2022061021361142100_B29 2022061021361142100_B5 2022061021361142100_B20 2022061021361142100_B16 2022061021361142100_B17 2022061021361142100_B14 2022061021361142100_B15 2022061021361142100_B12 2022061021361142100_B13 2022061021361142100_B10 2022061021361142100_B11 2022061021361142100_B18 2022061021361142100_B19 2022061021361142100_B50 2022061021361142100_B49 2022061021361142100_B47 2022061021361142100_B48 2022061021361142100_B45 2022061021361142100_B46 2022061021361142100_B43 2022061021361142100_B44 2022061021361142100_B41 2022061021361142100_B42 2022061021361142100_B40 2022061021361142100_B38 2022061021361142100_B39 2022061021361142100_B36 2022061021361142100_B37 2022061021361142100_B34 2022061021361142100_B35 2022061021361142100_B32 2022061021361142100_B33 2022061021361142100_B30 2022061021361142100_B31 |
References_xml | – ident: 2022061021361142100_B8 doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.004313 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B22 doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1168 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B35 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B17 doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.9.2639 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B34 doi: 10.1002/rcm.1327 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B50 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B1 doi: 10.1038/nrc1609 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B7 doi: 10.1016/1040-8428(94)00144-I – ident: 2022061021361142100_B42 doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh166 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B27 doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-031212 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B14 doi: 10.1053/sonc.2002.31522 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B45 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B5 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B24 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.014 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B30 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052258 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B32 doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.9-suppl_3-10 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B31 doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0399 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B6 doi: 10.1136/jcp.38.11.1225 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B19 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.114 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B28 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.18.3808 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B47 doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464110-00005 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B16 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B48 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B26 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa064320 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B23 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B12 doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.3.1165-1172.1989 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B43 doi: 10.1210/en.2003-0705 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B44 doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9307-8 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B41 doi: 10.1677/erc.0.0060373 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B11 doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00233-7 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B4 doi: 10.1053/sonc.2002.31525 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B33 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.16.584 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B39 doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2125 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B38 doi: 10.1186/bcr1606 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B29 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.194 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B25 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.719 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B13 doi: 10.1007/s002800000270 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B37 doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B2 doi: 10.1126/science.3798106 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B10 doi: 10.1016/S0065-230X(08)60784-8 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B36 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B49 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B15 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B18 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.03.038 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B40 doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.889s.11.2 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B9 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90801-K – ident: 2022061021361142100_B21 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B3 doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.11.824 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B46 doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70176-5 – ident: 2022061021361142100_B20 doi: 10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.3006 |
SSID | ssj0014104 |
Score | 2.1998775 |
Snippet | Purpose: The main objectives of this phase I and pharmacokinetic, open-label study were to determine the optimally tolerated regimen
(OTR), safety,... Purpose: The main objectives of this phase I and pharmacokinetic, open-label study were to determine the optimally tolerated regimen (OTR), safety,... The main objectives of this phase I and pharmacokinetic, open-label study were to determine the optimally tolerated regimen (OTR), safety, pharmacokinetics,... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref highwire |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 4484 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - pharmacokinetics Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Area Under Curve Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy dose escalation Female Humans lapatinib letrozole Male Maximum Tolerated Dose Middle Aged Neoplasms - drug therapy Nitriles - administration & dosage Nitriles - adverse effects Nitriles - pharmacokinetics Ovarian Neoplasms - drug therapy pharmacokinetics phase I Quinazolines - administration & dosage Quinazolines - adverse effects Quinazolines - pharmacokinetics Triazoles - administration & dosage Triazoles - adverse effects Triazoles - pharmacokinetics |
Title | A Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Lapatinib in Combination with Letrozole in Patients with Advanced Cancer |
URI | http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/14/14/4484.abstract https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18628463 https://www.proquest.com/docview/69315437 |
Volume | 14 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLbKkBAviDvlaiHeooRcbMd9rKLRberQYJvUNytXVrElU9c-sN_JD-Kc2E7CVMTgJa3iJnH6fTk-x_nOMSEfYNDPUllELqsgRAEPPHdlxkJXVBJXsatk0BbSPvws9k7ZwYIvRqOfA9XSZp15-fXWvJL_QRX2Aa6YJfsPyHYnhR3wHfCFLSAM21thPHWOzmAUcva15t9Uof4OjiOWYT229aLnKcqm62WmU_wuIBjWsLeTsPNyvWquUWQIrUe6zKrJeZtagUCCH6uhI5vYjMq8bXJM0aBucvnLZok5ncde4jnJ2aaf-F79cHZhF7CygrGzFwrNm9XSOfCcWXNeXOESnN0h5Tdnlpobt_MTEic-dYbmICUAbNWAbq2CUve8ExgObLCPRX-ZmfYsjV3mYAtDvaxEZ7jZkKBsYIaZLpC6ZXzgsp2qMFfwkuQr9hfXYRv-HmC-vGhJE0DEBy5a1A-XViJwYxTttI0Bg3BKYQ_ukLshBC-4rsZs0QmPUFjLtBJWd8LklUHXPm7tGNa1Nb343XmyBa3_HBy1TtLJQ_LARDd0qqn6iIzK-jG5d2j0G09IM6UtY-k-BcbSG4ylLWNpU9GOsXRZ0wFjKdKSdozFVstY3WQZSzXuT8npp92TZM81S364ObhTa5eL3BcTnmYs82WRBjIVsch4kWV-WspqEgWVyAIh-SQMywocMMnjKg7zuIijCDzl6BnZqZu6fEFokIrIZ7mAeBlFCzyVVRGIohI88ktRpmPC7H-pclMPH5dlOVdtXMylQjQUoqEADeXHCtEYE6877FIXhPnbAe8tUEo_kvaJVD1VxuSdhVCBfceXdmldNpsrJeCeOYvgNM81sv1VDSle3uYCr8j9_uF8TXbWq035Btzpdfa2ZecvDzHEYw |
linkProvider | Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+Phase+I+and+Pharmacokinetic+Study+of+Lapatinib+in+Combination+with+Letrozole+in+Patients+with+Advanced+Cancer&rft.jtitle=Clinical+cancer+research&rft.au=Quincy+S.C.+Chu&rft.au=Mary+E.+Cianfrocca&rft.au=Lori+J.+Goldstein&rft.au=Meg+Gale&rft.date=2008-07-15&rft.pub=American+Association+for+Cancer+Research&rft.issn=1078-0432&rft.eissn=1557-3265&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=4484&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158%2F1078-0432.CCR-07-4417&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F18628463&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=14_14_4484 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1078-0432&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1078-0432&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1078-0432&client=summon |