Reciprocity, Fairness and the Financial Burden of Undertaking COVID-19 Hotel Quarantine in Australia

In late March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Australia introduced mandatory 14-day supervised quarantine at hotels and other designated facilities for all international arrivals. From July 2020, most states and territories introduced a fixed charge for quarantine of up to $3220 per adult...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPublic health ethics Vol. 17; no. 1-2; pp. 67 - 79
Main Authors Pahlman, Kari, Williams, Jane, Silva, Diego S, Taffs, Louis, Haire, Bridget
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.04.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract In late March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Australia introduced mandatory 14-day supervised quarantine at hotels and other designated facilities for all international arrivals. From July 2020, most states and territories introduced a fixed charge for quarantine of up to $3220 per adult. The introduction of the fee was rationalised on the basis that Australians had been allowed sufficient time to return and there was a need to recover some of the cost associated with administering the program. Drawing on an empirical study of 58 returned Australian citizens and residents quarantined between March 2020 and January 2021, this paper aims to explore how people experienced paying for hotel quarantine, particularly with respect to fairness and relatedly, the principle of reciprocity. Reciprocity requires that the state has an obligation to assist individuals in discharging their duty to comply with public health measures and avoid disproportionate burdens accruing to populations or individuals. Though participants had varying opinions on whether they thought it fair to be charged for their quarantine, for many, the fee constituted a significant burden and source of stress. Given the undertaking of quarantine is primarily for the benefit of the public good, we argue the financial cost imposed on individuals does not meet the demands of reciprocity. It is imperative that future quarantine and isolation arrangements consider seriously the need to minimise burdens of individuals subject to such measures, and that fees do not become a new norm in public health and infectious disease control.
AbstractList In late March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Australia introduced mandatory 14-day supervised quarantine at hotels and other designated facilities for all international arrivals. From July 2020, most states and territories introduced a fixed charge for quarantine of up to $3220 per adult. The introduction of the fee was rationalised on the basis that Australians had been allowed sufficient time to return and there was a need to recover some of the cost associated with administering the program. Drawing on an empirical study of 58 returned Australian citizens and residents quarantined between March 2020 and January 2021, this paper aims to explore how people experienced paying for hotel quarantine, particularly with respect to fairness and relatedly, the principle of reciprocity. Reciprocity requires that the state has an obligation to assist individuals in discharging their duty to comply with public health measures and avoid disproportionate burdens accruing to populations or individuals. Though participants had varying opinions on whether they thought it fair to be charged for their quarantine, for many, the fee constituted a significant burden and source of stress. Given the undertaking of quarantine is primarily for the benefit of the public good, we argue the financial cost imposed on individuals does not meet the demands of reciprocity. It is imperative that future quarantine and isolation arrangements consider seriously the need to minimise burdens of individuals subject to such measures, and that fees do not become a new norm in public health and infectious disease control.
In late March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Australia introduced mandatory 14-day supervised quarantine at hotels and other designated facilities for all international arrivals. From July 2020, most states and territories introduced a fixed charge for quarantine of up to $3220 per adult. The introduction of the fee was rationalised on the basis that Australians had been allowed sufficient time to return and there was a need to recover some of the cost associated with administering the program. Drawing on an empirical study of 58 returned Australian citizens and residents quarantined between March 2020 and January 2021, this paper aims to explore how people experienced paying for hotel quarantine, particularly with respect to fairness and relatedly, the principle of reciprocity. Reciprocity requires that the state has an obligation to assist individuals in discharging their duty to comply with public health measures and avoid disproportionate burdens accruing to populations or individuals. Though participants had varying opinions on whether they thought it fair to be charged for their quarantine, for many, the fee constituted a significant burden and source of stress. Given the undertaking of quarantine is primarily for the benefit of the public good, we argue the financial cost imposed on individuals does not meet the demands of reciprocity. It is imperative that future quarantine and isolation arrangements consider seriously the need to minimise burdens of individuals subject to such measures, and that fees do not become a new norm in public health and infectious disease control. In March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Australia introduced mandatory 14-day supervised quarantine at hotels and other designated facilities for all international arrivals. From July 2020, most states and territories introduced a fixed charge for quarantine of up to $3220 per adult. The introduction of the fee was rationalised on the basis that Australians had then been allowed sufficient time to return, and there was a need to recover some of the cost associated with administering the program. Drawing on an empirical study of 58 returned Australian citizens and residents quarantined between March 2020 and January 2021, this paper aims to explore how people experienced paying for hotel quarantine, particularly with respect to fairness and relatedly, the principle of reciprocity. Though participants had varying opinions on whether they thought it fair to be charged for their quarantine, for many, the fee constituted a significant burden and source of stress. Given the undertaking of quarantine is primarily for the benefit of the public good, we argue the financial cost imposed on individuals does not meet the ethical demands of reciprocity.
In late March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Australia introduced mandatory 14-day supervised quarantine at hotels and other designated facilities for all international arrivals. From July 2020, most states and territories introduced a fixed charge for quarantine of up to $3220 per adult. The introduction of the fee was rationalised on the basis that Australians had been allowed sufficient time to return and there was a need to recover some of the cost associated with administering the program. Drawing on an empirical study of 58 returned Australian citizens and residents quarantined between March 2020 and January 2021, this paper aims to explore how people experienced paying for hotel quarantine, particularly with respect to fairness and relatedly, the principle of reciprocity. Reciprocity requires that the state has an obligation to assist individuals in discharging their duty to comply with public health measures and avoid disproportionate burdens accruing to populations or individuals. Though participants had varying opinions on whether they thought it fair to be charged for their quarantine, for many, the fee constituted a significant burden and source of stress. Given the undertaking of quarantine is primarily for the benefit of the public good, we argue the financial cost imposed on individuals does not meet the demands of reciprocity. It is imperative that future quarantine and isolation arrangements consider seriously the need to minimise burdens of individuals subject to such measures, and that fees do not become a new norm in public health and infectious disease control.In late March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Australia introduced mandatory 14-day supervised quarantine at hotels and other designated facilities for all international arrivals. From July 2020, most states and territories introduced a fixed charge for quarantine of up to $3220 per adult. The introduction of the fee was rationalised on the basis that Australians had been allowed sufficient time to return and there was a need to recover some of the cost associated with administering the program. Drawing on an empirical study of 58 returned Australian citizens and residents quarantined between March 2020 and January 2021, this paper aims to explore how people experienced paying for hotel quarantine, particularly with respect to fairness and relatedly, the principle of reciprocity. Reciprocity requires that the state has an obligation to assist individuals in discharging their duty to comply with public health measures and avoid disproportionate burdens accruing to populations or individuals. Though participants had varying opinions on whether they thought it fair to be charged for their quarantine, for many, the fee constituted a significant burden and source of stress. Given the undertaking of quarantine is primarily for the benefit of the public good, we argue the financial cost imposed on individuals does not meet the demands of reciprocity. It is imperative that future quarantine and isolation arrangements consider seriously the need to minimise burdens of individuals subject to such measures, and that fees do not become a new norm in public health and infectious disease control.
Author Pahlman, Kari
Taffs, Louis
Haire, Bridget
Silva, Diego S
Williams, Jane
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Kari
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1259-5120
  surname: Pahlman
  fullname: Pahlman, Kari
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jane
  surname: Williams
  fullname: Williams, Jane
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Diego S
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8195-6404
  surname: Silva
  fullname: Silva, Diego S
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Louis
  surname: Taffs
  fullname: Taffs, Louis
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Bridget
  surname: Haire
  fullname: Haire, Bridget
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39005526$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpVkd1LHDEUxUOx-FWffJc8Cu1oviazeRK77VZBEEvta7iT3HGjs8mazBT87zvidrEPl3vh_jgHzjkgOzFFJOSYszPOjDxfL3Ea8Ew0H8g-b2pVGTPjO9u7kXvkoJRHxrRQot4le9IwVtdC7xP_E11Y5-TC8PKFLiDkiKVQiJ4OS6SLECG6AD39OmaPkaaO3kePeYCnEB_o_Pb39beKG3qVBuzp3QgZ4hAi0hDp5ViGDH2AT-RjB33Bo80-JPeL77_mV9XN7Y_r-eVN5aRiQ-VRcwazznHplNazzmhsvOoctNgq41mrNXSuFkIxIZxSUgI41TqJpvGyk4fk4k13PbYr9A7jq79d57CC_GITBPv_J4alfUh_LOdC1dqoSeF0o5DT84hlsKtQHPY9RExjsZLNmJa14nJCT96bbV3-ZTsBn98Al1MpGbstwpl9bc5OzdlNc_IvkbSN4Q
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101329
10.1080/15265160802180059
10.1016/j.ssmqr.2021.100034
10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
10.1111/1467-8462.12503
10.1007/s40592-022-00151-x
10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31032-1
10.1007/s11673-009-9149-2
10.53637/NHGB1203
10.1080/13523260.2020.1771955
10.1136/medethics-2020-107104
10.3998/jpe.1519
10.1186/s12889-022-13339-x
10.1007/s40592-020-00104-2
10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
10.1007/s11673-009-9160-7
10.1111/josp.12408
10.2307/healhumarigh.17.1.52
10.1080/13642987.2022.2058496
10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002629
10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
10.5694/mja2.51046
10.1007/s11673-015-9691-z
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.
The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. 2023
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.
– notice: The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. 2023
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1093/phe/phad027
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
PubMed

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Public Health
EISSN 1754-9981
EndPage 79
ExternalDocumentID PMC11245694
39005526
10_1093_phe_phad027
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: ;
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 1116530
GroupedDBID ---
.2P
.I3
.ZR
0R~
123
4.4
48X
5VS
5WD
70D
AABCJ
AABZA
AACZT
AAFXQ
AAJKP
AAMDB
AAMVS
AAMZS
AAOGV
AAPNW
AAPQZ
AAPXW
AARHZ
AAUAY
AAUOS
AAVAP
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABDFA
ABEJV
ABEUO
ABGNP
ABICN
ABIXL
ABJNI
ABKDP
ABKEB
ABNHQ
ABNKS
ABPQP
ABPTD
ABQLI
ABVGC
ABWST
ABXVK
ABXVV
ABYLZ
ABZBJ
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACMCV
ACOZV
ACQVJ
ACUFI
ACUTO
ACVHY
ADAES
ADBBV
ADBKU
ADEYI
ADGZP
ADHKW
ADHZD
ADIPN
ADLOL
ADNBA
ADOCK
ADQBN
ADQIT
ADRTK
ADVEK
ADYLA
ADYVW
ADZXQ
AEGPL
AEJER
AEJOX
AEKSI
AEMDU
AENEX
AENZO
AEPUE
AETBJ
AEWNT
AFCKW
AFFZL
AFHLB
AFIYH
AFOFC
AFSJJ
AFVIK
AFVSF
AGFCL
AGINJ
AGKEF
AGORE
AGQXC
AGQZG
AGSYK
AHDHG
AHGBF
AHMMS
AHXPO
AIJHB
AJBYB
AJEEA
AJNCP
AKWXX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQC
ALXQX
AMHCJ
APIBT
APWMN
ASPYK
ATGXG
AXUDD
AYLYT
BAYMD
BCRHZ
BEYMZ
BHONS
BHZBG
BOXDG
BTRTY
BVRKM
BWUDY
CDBKE
CITATION
CNZYI
CS3
CZ4
DAKXR
DILTD
D~K
EBS
EE~
ESX
ETYVG
EYXSX
F5P
F9B
FLUFQ
FOEOM
FOTVD
FQBLK
FTKQU
GAUVT
GJXCC
H13
H5~
HAR
HW0
HZ~
IOX
J21
JXSIZ
KOP
KSI
KSN
M-Z
MJWOD
MXSPP
N9A
NGC
NOMLY
NOYVH
NPJNY
O9-
OAWHX
OCZFY
ODMLO
OJQWA
OJZSN
OPAEJ
OWPYF
OXVUA
P2P
PAFKI
PEELM
PLIXB
Q1.
Q5Y
RD5
ROX
RUSNO
RW1
RXO
TJH
TJJ
TJX
X7H
YADRA
YAJVU
YAYTL
YKOAZ
YXANX
~91
~D7
~SN
1TH
29P
2WC
AAGQS
AAJQQ
AAUQX
AAZDW
ABBHK
ABQTQ
ABXSQ
ACUHS
ADJQC
ADRIX
ADULT
AEJYH
AEUPB
AFXEN
AILCM
AOLPF
EBD
EJD
JENOY
JKPJF
JPL
JPM
JSODD
JST
JVCUD
KBUDW
M49
NPM
NU-
O0~
O5R
O5S
SA0
THA
TUS
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-de610a8fc13c4668f96e7d4fcabeb49d0b66afc5224022c4433aac4bc3e97d3f3
ISSN 1754-9973
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:32:51 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 05:27:12 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:03:56 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:15:10 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1-2
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c340t-de610a8fc13c4668f96e7d4fcabeb49d0b66afc5224022c4433aac4bc3e97d3f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-1259-5120
0000-0002-8195-6404
OpenAccessLink https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11245694
PMID 39005526
PQID 3080635413
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11245694
proquest_miscellaneous_3080635413
pubmed_primary_39005526
crossref_primary_10_1093_phe_phad027
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: UK
PublicationTitle Public health ethics
PublicationTitleAlternate Public Health Ethics
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publisher_xml – name: Oxford University Press
References Braun (2024071310511545000_CIT0005) 2006; 3
Cameron (2024071310511545000_CIT0008) 2021; 47
Upshur (2024071310511545000_CIT0040) 2003; 5
Tobin (2024071310511545000_CIT0038) 2020
Coronavirus Victoria (2024071310511545000_CIT0011) 2021
NSW Government (2024071310511545000_CIT0025) 2020
Silva (2024071310511545000_CIT0035) 2016; 13
Coate (2024071310511545000_CIT0010) 2020
Silva (2024071310511545000_CIT0033) 2022; 40
Gostin (2024071310511545000_CIT0018) 2003; 290
Visontay (2024071310511545000_CIT0043) 2020
Parliament of Australia (2024071310511545000_CIT0026) 2020
Fotheringham (2024071310511545000_CIT0017) 2023; 21
Haire (2024071310511545000_CIT0019) 2022; 22
Halton (2024071310511545000_CIT0020) 2021
Tobin (2024071310511545000_CIT0039) 2021
Jolkina (2024071310511545000_CIT0023) 2021
World Health Organization (2024071310511545000_CIT0046) 2005
Foster (2024071310511545000_CIT0016) 2021; 44
Fenton (2024071310511545000_CIT0014) 2021; 9
Soutphommasane (2024071310511545000_CIT0037) 2021
Becker (2024071310511545000_CIT0002) 1986
Holm (2024071310511545000_CIT0021) 2009; 6
Sheel (2024071310511545000_CIT0032) 2021
Carter (2024071310511545000_CIT0009) 2019
Ferhani (2024071310511545000_CIT0015) 2020; 41
Simic (2024071310511545000_CIT0036) 2023; 27
Bennett (2024071310511545000_CIT0003) 2022; 43
Borland (2024071310511545000_CIT0004) 2023; 56
Lee (2024071310511545000_CIT0024) 2020; 395
Dinh (2024071310511545000_CIT0013) 2021; 214
Braun (2024071310511545000_CIT0007) 2019; 11
Williams (2024071310511545000_CIT0045) 2022; 2
Queensland Government (2024071310511545000_CIT0028) 2023
ACT Health (2024071310511545000_CIT0001) 2023
Revenue NSW (2024071310511545000_CIT0031) 2021
Silva (2024071310511545000_CIT0034) 2015; 17
Braun (2024071310511545000_CIT0006) 2017; 12
Department of Health (2024071310511545000_CIT0012) 2020
Viens (2024071310511545000_CIT0041) 2008; 8
von Tigerstrom (2024071310511545000_CIT0044) 2020; 5
World Health Organization (2024071310511545000_CIT0047) 2021
Holm (2024071310511545000_CIT0022) 2020; 38
Viens (2024071310511545000_CIT0042) 2009; 6
Pugh (2024071310511545000_CIT0027) 2021
Queensland Health (2024071310511545000_CIT0029) 2023
Randall (2024071310511545000_CIT0030) 2021; 52
References_xml – volume: 21
  start-page: 101329
  year: 2023
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0017
  article-title: Protecting Mental Health in Quarantine: Exploring Lived Experiences of Healthcare in Mandatory COVID-19 Quarantine, New South Wales, Australia
  publication-title: SSM – Population Health
  doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101329
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0041
  article-title: Public Health, Ethical Behaviour and Reciprocity
  publication-title: The American Journal of Bioethics
  doi: 10.1080/15265160802180059
– volume-title: Reciprocity
  year: 1986
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0002
– volume: 2
  start-page: 100034
  year: 2022
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0045
  article-title: Uncertainty and Agency in COVID-19 Hotel Quarantine in Australia
  publication-title: SSM – Qualitative Research in Health
  doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2021.100034
– volume-title: ABC News
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0038
  article-title: As Coronavirus Restrictions Tighten, Returning Australians Risk Losing Their Flights If They Don’t Upgrade to Business Class
– volume: 12
  start-page: 297
  year: 2017
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0006
  article-title: Thematic Analysis
  publication-title: The Journal of Positive Psychology
  doi: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
– start-page: 547
  volume-title: The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory
  year: 2019
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0009
  article-title: Grounded Theory and Empirical Ethics
– volume: 56
  start-page: 109
  year: 2023
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0004
  article-title: JobKeeper: An Initial Assessment
  publication-title: The Australian Economic Review
  doi: 10.1111/1467-8462.12503
– volume-title: The Guardian
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0043
  article-title: ACCC Investigates Complaints About Airlines Flying to Australia During Covid-19
– volume-title: Fees and Payment for Isolation and Quarantine
  year: 2023
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0028
– volume-title: COVID-19 Hotel Quarantine Inquiry: Interim Report and Recommendations
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0010
– volume-title: Public Health Act 1997: Republication No 41 Effective 30 September 2023
  year: 2023
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0001
– volume: 40
  start-page: 94
  year: 2022
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0033
  article-title: The Abandonment of Australians in India: An Analysis of the Right of Entry as a Security Right in the Age of COVID-19
  publication-title: Monash Bioethics Review
  doi: 10.1007/s40592-022-00151-x
– volume-title: Accommodation Arrivals: Contribution Fees for Hotel Quarantine
  year: 2021
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0011
– volume: 395
  start-page: 1593
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0024
  article-title: Global Coordination on Cross-Border Travel and Trade Measures Crucial to COVID-19 Response
  publication-title: The Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31032-1
– volume: 5
  start-page: 523
  year: 2003
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0040
  article-title: The Ethics of Quarantine
  publication-title: Virtual Mentor – AMA Journal of Ethics
– volume: 6
  start-page: 207
  year: 2009
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0042
  article-title: Your Liberty or Your Life: Reciprocity in the Use of Restrictive Measures in Contexts of Contagion
  publication-title: Bioethical Inquiry
  doi: 10.1007/s11673-009-9149-2
– volume: 44
  start-page: 103
  year: 2021
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0016
  article-title: Refugee Protection in the COVID-19 Crisis and Beyond: The Capacity and Limits of International Law
  publication-title: University of New South Wales Law Journal
  doi: 10.53637/NHGB1203
– volume-title: Practical Ethics
  year: 2021
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0027
  article-title: An Ethical Review of Hotel Quarantine Policies for International Arrivals
– volume: 41
  start-page: 458
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0015
  article-title: The International Health Regulations, COVID-19, and Bordering Practices: Who Gets in, What Gets Out, and Who Gets Rescued
  publication-title: Contemporary Security Policy
  doi: 10.1080/13523260.2020.1771955
– volume-title: Public Health Act 2005: Current as at 1 November 2023
  year: 2023
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0029
– volume: 290
  start-page: 3229
  year: 2003
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0018
  article-title: Ethical and Legal Challenges Posed by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: Implications for the Control of Severe Infectious Disease Threats
  publication-title: Health Law and Ethics
– volume-title: ANU College of Health and Medicine News
  year: 2021
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0032
  article-title: International Borders Are About to Open, but Our Research Shows the Plight of Stranded Australians is Not Over
– volume-title: NSW to Charge Returned International Travellers for Hotel Quarantine
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0025
– volume: 47
  start-page: 553
  year: 2021
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0008
  article-title: Ethics of Selective Restriction of Liberty in a Pandemic
  publication-title: Journal of Medical Ethics
  doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107104
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1
  year: 2021
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0014
  article-title: Reciprocity and Resources
  publication-title: Journal of Practical Ethics
  doi: 10.3998/jpe.1519
– volume: 22
  start-page: 953
  year: 2022
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0019
  article-title: Experiences of Risk in Australian Hotel Quarantine: A Qualitative Study
  publication-title: BMC Public Health
  doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13339-x
– volume: 38
  start-page: 32
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0022
  article-title: A General Approach to Compensation for Losses Incurred due to Public Health Interventions in the Infectious Disease Context
  publication-title: Monash Bioethics Review
  doi: 10.1007/s40592-020-00104-2
– volume-title: Transcript of Press Conference: Australian Parliament House, ACT: 27 March 2020: National Cabinet Meeting; Coronavirus; G20 Meeting; Returned Traveller Quarantine Measures; Economy; Plan to Hibernate Australian Businesses; Possible Stage 3 Restrictions; Schools; Childcare; China; Australians Overseas; Tenancy Measures; Supply of Medical Equipment; and Hospitals
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0026
– volume-title: Pandemic Strips Away the Myth of Equality
  year: 2021
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0037
– volume: 11
  start-page: 589
  year: 2019
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0007
  article-title: Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis
  publication-title: Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health
  doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
– volume: 43
  start-page: 403
  year: 2022
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0003
  article-title: COVID-19 and the Future of Australian Public Health Law
  publication-title: Adelaide Law Review
– volume: 6
  start-page: 197
  year: 2009
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0021
  article-title: Should Persons Detained During Public Health Crises Receive Compensation
  publication-title: Bioethical Inquiry
  doi: 10.1007/s11673-009-9160-7
– volume: 52
  start-page: 516
  year: 2021
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0030
  article-title: Reciprocity and the Ethics of Giving During Pandemics
  publication-title: Journal of Social Philosophy
  doi: 10.1111/josp.12408
– volume: 17
  start-page: 52
  year: 2015
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0034
  article-title: Limiting Rights and Freedoms in the Context of Ebola and Other Public Health Emergencies: How the Principle of Reciprocity Can Enrich the Application of the Siracusa Principles
  publication-title: Health and Human Rights
  doi: 10.2307/healhumarigh.17.1.52
– volume-title: ABC News
  year: 2021
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0039
  article-title: Hotel Quarantine Guests Charged Up to $1,400 Extra for Access to a Balcony
– volume-title: International Health Regulations (2005) Third Edition
  year: 2005
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0046
– volume-title: Paying for Hotel Quarantine in WA: Frequently Asked Questions
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0012
– volume-title: National Review of Quarantine
  year: 2021
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0020
– volume-title: Quarantine Fees
  year: 2021
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0031
– volume: 27
  start-page: 830
  year: 2023
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0036
  article-title: The Challenge of ‘COVID-19 free’ Australia: International Travel Restrictions and Stranded Australians
  publication-title: International Journal of Human Rights
  doi: 10.1080/13642987.2022.2058496
– volume: 5
  start-page: e002629
  year: 2020
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0044
  article-title: COVID-19 Travel Restrictions and the International Health Regulations (2005)
  publication-title: BMJ Global Health
  doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002629
– volume-title: London School of Economics and Political Science COVID-19 blog
  year: 2021
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0023
  article-title: £2,285 for the Right to Return Home – Or Why the UK’s Hotel Quarantine Scheme Went Too Far
– volume: 3
  start-page: 77
  year: 2006
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0005
  article-title: Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology
  publication-title: Qualitative Research in Psychology
  doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
– volume: 214
  start-page: 473
  year: 2021
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0013
  article-title: Emergency Department Presentations from Quarantine Hotels in Sydney, Australia, During the COVID-19 Outbreak – An Analysis of Clinical Patterns and Outcomes
  publication-title: Medical Journal of Australia
  doi: 10.5694/mja2.51046
– volume-title: COVID-19 Virtual Press Conference Transcript – 14 May 2021
  year: 2021
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0047
– volume: 13
  start-page: 75
  year: 2016
  ident: 2024071310511545000_CIT0035
  article-title: Reciprocity and Ethical Tuberculosis Treatment and Control
  publication-title: Bioethical Inquiry
  doi: 10.1007/s11673-015-9691-z
SSID ssj0062425
Score 2.300303
Snippet In late March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Australia introduced mandatory 14-day supervised quarantine at hotels and other designated facilities...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 67
SubjectTerms Original
Title Reciprocity, Fairness and the Financial Burden of Undertaking COVID-19 Hotel Quarantine in Australia
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39005526
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3080635413
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11245694
Volume 17
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3JbtswECVa51KgKNp0czewQG6uGkWkJOuYTXBTNwlQu_BN4FoLMKQgkXPI12dEUrKU5JD2Qhi0QQkzz8M35CwI7cA_BrY58FS5Zsqjccw9IPXgrCSaJTIkcs_E5vw6jSZzerIIF5tuoya7pOLfxc2DeSX_o1WYA73WWbL_oNl2UZiAz6BfGEHDMD5Kx8D58noHcpX9U5ZfGsvVREWmbTkNm61QM0PT6KgyPahGh2d_fhyBwEaTslIrE-DJ6s4RqncK0uWv552q2MuR6gXLn7Plyp2n_gQP_KETnRO2ucX_na-u7WVTrv6Wo84ZgrahjNNynfdOJYJuMIs1pHFIQeu2TUlraeMuolzaozWctifHPXtua11dLJUZmfRtIYF-3ezTsyydT6fZ7Hgxe4q2AnAYggHa2j84OkibXblOgwlNcqx7L5erCQ_YheV33eJ9dnLP5bgbOduhIrOX6IXzIfC-BcQr9EQV2-i5VQ22eWWvkeyA4xtuoIEBGhiggVtoYAsNXGrcgQZuoIENNPAGGjgvcAuNN2ieHs8OJ55rqeEJQv3KkwroMhtrsUcEjaKxTiIVS6oF44rTRPo8ipgWYU30gkBQSghjgnJBVBJLoslbNCjKQr1HOALmCb69kDBNqY544I85iX0d6IRQrodopxFldmErp2Q24oFkIPHMSXyIvjZizsCy1ddVAMVyfZURcGaADgPLGqJ3VuztQmBe_DAMoiEa9xTS_qCumt7_psiXpno6OBjgNCT0wyMe_BE924D7ExpUl2v1GUhoxb84fN0Cp56NVQ
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reciprocity%2C+Fairness+and+the+Financial+Burden+of+Undertaking+COVID-19+Hotel+Quarantine+in+Australia&rft.jtitle=Public+health+ethics&rft.au=Pahlman%2C+Kari&rft.au=Williams%2C+Jane&rft.au=Silva%2C+Diego+S&rft.au=Taffs%2C+Louis&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.issn=1754-9973&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=67&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093%2Fphe%2Fphad027&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1754-9973&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1754-9973&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1754-9973&client=summon