Evaluation of the Validity of Crystallization Temperature Measurements Using Thermography with Different Sample Configurations

We describe further progress of a previously reported novel crystallization temperature ($T_{\text{x}}$) measurement method applicable for small sample sizes. The method uses thermography and detects $T_{\text{x}}$ as a change in emissivity of thin film amorphous alloy samples. We applied this metho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJapanese Journal of Applied Physics Vol. 49; no. 7; pp. 076601 - 076601-7
Main Authors Aono, Yuko, Sakurai, Junpei, Shimokohbe, Akira, Hata, Seiichi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published The Japan Society of Applied Physics 01.07.2010
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We describe further progress of a previously reported novel crystallization temperature ($T_{\text{x}}$) measurement method applicable for small sample sizes. The method uses thermography and detects $T_{\text{x}}$ as a change in emissivity of thin film amorphous alloy samples. We applied this method to various sample configurations of Pd--Cu--Si thin film metallic glass (TFMG). The validity of the detected $T_{\text{x}}$ was determined by electrical resistivity monitoring and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Crystallization temperature can be detected in all sample configurations; however, it was found that the magnitude of the detected change of emissivity at $T_{\text{x}}$ depended on the sample configuration. This emissivity change was clear in the absence of a higher emissivity material. The results suggest that this method can achieve high-throughput characterization of $T_{\text{x}}$ for integrated small samples such as in a thin film library.
Bibliography:(Color online) $T$--$T_{\text{a}}$ curve showing emissivity change for the case of (a) emissivity increasing and (b) emissivity decreasing. (Color online) Schematic diagram of experimental setup for heating test. (Color online) Larger-sized sample used to verify the measurement technique: (a) photograph of sample separated into two pieces, each $7 \times 16$ mm 2 with a thickness of 4 \mbox{$\mu$m}; (b) schematic illustration of setup for heating test. A current of 0.1 A was applied to one sample using a constant current source. The apparent temperature, $T_{\text{a}}$, was measured as the average value over the hatched area and the emissivities shown in Fig. were measured at point A and B (on sample and on alumina, respectively). (Color online) $T$--$T_{\text{a}}$ curve, electrical resistivity and DSC data for larger-sized ($7 \times 16$) sample. (Color online) Change in emissivity with temperature for larger-sized sample. The sample and alumina measurement points are indicated in Fig. ; (a) apparent emissivity, (b) emissivity relative to the value at 550 K ($T_{\text{x}} = 657$ K is obtained from the DSC results shown in Fig. ). (Color online) XRD patterns of as-sputtered and post-heating samples. (Color online) Conventional thin film library size sample: (a) fabrication method; (b) photograph of finished sample chip. (Color online) $T$--$T_{\text{a}}$ curve of thin film library size ($1 \times 1$ mm 2 ) sample ($T_{\text{x}} = 657$ K is obtained from the DSC results shown in Fig. ). (Color online) Change in emissivity with temperature for thin film library size sample: (a) apparent emissivity; (b) emissivity relative to the value at 550 K ($T_{\text{x}} = 657$ K is obtained from the DSC results shown in Fig. ). (Color online) Schematic illustration of infrared radiation from alumina and TFMG. (Color online) Effect of alumina on the larger-sized sample: (a) schematic illustration defining the position $x$ measured from the sample; (b) emissivity as a function of $x$ (left axis) at 630 K (square symbols) and 670 K (round symbols). The triangular symbols indicate the percentage change in emissivity (right axis) from 630 to 670 K. (Color online) Dependence of $T$--$T_{\text{a}}$ curve shape on position $x$ within the sample ($T_{\text{x}} = 657$ K is obtained from the DSC results shown in Fig. ). (Color online) Dependence of two defined $T_{\text{x}}$s in Fig. on position $x$ within the sample ($T_{\text{x}} = 657$ K is obtained from the DSC results shown in Fig. ). (Color online) $T$--$T_{\text{a}}$ curve of resized sample ($T_{\text{x}} = 657$ K is obtained from the DSC results shown in Fig. ). (Color online) Schematic cross section of sample on metal chip. (Color online) Fabrication method of sample with groove chip. (Color online) $T$--$T_{\text{a}}$ curves for metal covered samples ($T_{\text{x}} = 657$ K is obtained from the DSC results shown in Fig. ). (Color online) $T_{\text{x}}$ distribution for different sample configurations and definitions of $T_{\text{x}}$ ($T_{\text{x}} = 657$ K is obtained from the DSC results shown in Fig. ).
ISSN:0021-4922
1347-4065
DOI:10.1143/JJAP.49.076601