Benchmark comparison of dual-basis double-hybrid density functional theory and a neural-network-optimized method for intermolecular interactions

[Display omitted] •Double-hybrid density functional theory (DH-DFT) is accurate but expensive for larger systems.•Here an efficient dual-basis DH-DFT is derived and implemented for general use in GAMESS.•Differences between dual-basis and conventional DH-DFT energies are negligible.•Benchmark compar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of molecular spectroscopy Vol. 376; p. 111406
Main Authors Lutz, Jesse J., Byrd, Jason N., Montgomery Jr, John A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.02.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] •Double-hybrid density functional theory (DH-DFT) is accurate but expensive for larger systems.•Here an efficient dual-basis DH-DFT is derived and implemented for general use in GAMESS.•Differences between dual-basis and conventional DH-DFT energies are negligible.•Benchmark comparisons reveal dual-basis DH-DFT offers comparable accuracy to state-of-the-art neural-network-based approaches at a reduced computational expense. We present a computationally efficient implementation of double-hybrid density functional theory (DH-DFT) leveraging the dual basis methods of Head-Gordon and co-workers and the resolution-of-the-identity second-order Møller-Plesset (RI-MP2) theory. The B2PLYP, B2GP-PLYP, DSD-BLYP and DSD-PBEP86 density functionals are applied to assess the performance of dual-basis methods on several benchmark test cases, including the CONF set of conformational energy differences in C4-C7 alkanes, the S22 set of noncovalent interaction energies, and the RGC10 noble-gas dimer dissociation curves. The dual-basis DH-DFT approach is shown to give results in excellent agreement with conventional methods at a reduced computational cost. For noncovalent interaction energies, DH-DFT is compared against a leading neural-network-based approach, namely the SNS-MP2 method of McGibbon and coworkers (McGibbon et al., 2017). The DH-DFT and SNS-MP2 methods are shown to produce similar accuracies when compared to the established benchmark values.
ISSN:0022-2852
1096-083X
DOI:10.1016/j.jms.2020.111406