Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement in Trauma Patients: Early vs Delayed Initiation of Enteral Feeding

• Published in: The American surgeon Vol. 89; no. 7; p. 3336
• Main Authors: Garner, Sydney M, Reparaz, Laura, Justice, Jessica, Foster, Alexandra P, Litzenberger, Stephanie, Bell, Nathaniel, Schaller, Stephanie L, Spoor, Kristen, Cull, John, Watson, Christopher M, Dunkelberger, Lindsey C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.07.2023
• Subjects: Critical Illness - therapy; Endoscopy; Enteral Nutrition; Gastrostomy; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Retrospective Studies; gastrointestinal; trauma; intensive care unit; surgical nutrition
• ISSN: 1555-9823
• DOI: 10.1177/00031348231157880

In critically ill trauma patients, adequate nutrition is essential for the body's healing process. Currently, there is no clinical standard for initiating feeds after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement. We aimed to demonstrate that early enteral nutrition (EN) is as safe as delayed EN in patients who have undergone PEG tube insertion. We conducted a multi-center, retrospective cohort study of 384 patients from the Prisma Health Trauma Registries who received PEGs. Feeding intolerance was defined as high gastric residuals, nausea, emesis, sustained diarrhea, or ileus. The probability that a patient would experience intolerance was 11.7% in those fed within 6 hours, 5.1% among patients fed between 6 and 12 hours, 6.0% among patients fed between 12 and 24 hours, and 7.6% among patients fed after 24 hours, for which no statistically significant difference was detected. These findings support that early EN after PEG placement is safe in critically ill, trauma patients.