Concurrent perception of competing predictions: A “split-stimulus effect”

Visual illusions are systematic misperceptions that can help us glean the heuristics with which the brain constructs visual experience. In a recently discovered visual illusion (the "frame effect"), it has been shown that flashing a stimulus inside of a moving frame produces a large misper...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.) Vol. 24; no. 11; p. 5
Main Authors Melling, Joseph, Turner, William, Hogendoorn, Hinze
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 08.10.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Visual illusions are systematic misperceptions that can help us glean the heuristics with which the brain constructs visual experience. In a recently discovered visual illusion (the "frame effect"), it has been shown that flashing a stimulus inside of a moving frame produces a large misperception of that stimulus's position. Across two experiments, we investigated a novel illusion (the "split stimulus effect") where the symmetrical motion of two overlaid frames produces two simultaneous positional misperceptions of a single stimulus. That is, one stimulus is presented but two are perceived. In both experiments, a single red dot was flashed when the moving frames reversed direction, and participants were asked to report how many dots they saw. Naïve participants sometimes reported seeing two dots when only one was presented, indicating spontaneous perception of the illusion. A Bayesian analysis of the population prevalence of this effect was conducted. The dependence of this effect on the frames' speed, the dot's opacity, spatial attention, as the presence/absence of pre-flash motion ("postdiction") was also investigated, and the features of this illusion were compared to similar motion position illusions within a predictive processing framework. In demonstrating this illusory "splitting" effect, this study is the first to show that it is possible to be simultaneously aware of two opposing perceptual predictions about a single object and provides evidence of the hyperpriors that limit and inform the structure of visual experience.
AbstractList Visual illusions are systematic misperceptions that can help us glean the heuristics with which the brain constructs visual experience. In a recently discovered visual illusion (the “frame effect”), it has been shown that flashing a stimulus inside of a moving frame produces a large misperception of that stimulus's position. Across two experiments, we investigated a novel illusion (the “split stimulus effect”) where the symmetrical motion of two overlaid frames produces two simultaneous positional misperceptions of a single stimulus. That is, one stimulus is presented but two are perceived. In both experiments, a single red dot was flashed when the moving frames reversed direction, and participants were asked to report how many dots they saw. Naïve participants sometimes reported seeing two dots when only one was presented, indicating spontaneous perception of the illusion. A Bayesian analysis of the population prevalence of this effect was conducted. The dependence of this effect on the frames’ speed, the dot's opacity, spatial attention, as the presence/absence of pre-flash motion (“postdiction”) was also investigated, and the features of this illusion were compared to similar motion position illusions within a predictive processing framework. In demonstrating this illusory “splitting” effect, this study is the first to show that it is possible to be simultaneously aware of two opposing perceptual predictions about a single object and provides evidence of the hyperpriors that limit and inform the structure of visual experience.
Visual illusions are systematic misperceptions that can help us glean the heuristics with which the brain constructs visual experience. In a recently discovered visual illusion (the "frame effect"), it has been shown that flashing a stimulus inside of a moving frame produces a large misperception of that stimulus's position. Across two experiments, we investigated a novel illusion (the "split stimulus effect") where the symmetrical motion of two overlaid frames produces two simultaneous positional misperceptions of a single stimulus. That is, one stimulus is presented but two are perceived. In both experiments, a single red dot was flashed when the moving frames reversed direction, and participants were asked to report how many dots they saw. Naïve participants sometimes reported seeing two dots when only one was presented, indicating spontaneous perception of the illusion. A Bayesian analysis of the population prevalence of this effect was conducted. The dependence of this effect on the frames' speed, the dot's opacity, spatial attention, as the presence/absence of pre-flash motion ("postdiction") was also investigated, and the features of this illusion were compared to similar motion position illusions within a predictive processing framework. In demonstrating this illusory "splitting" effect, this study is the first to show that it is possible to be simultaneously aware of two opposing perceptual predictions about a single object and provides evidence of the hyperpriors that limit and inform the structure of visual experience.Visual illusions are systematic misperceptions that can help us glean the heuristics with which the brain constructs visual experience. In a recently discovered visual illusion (the "frame effect"), it has been shown that flashing a stimulus inside of a moving frame produces a large misperception of that stimulus's position. Across two experiments, we investigated a novel illusion (the "split stimulus effect") where the symmetrical motion of two overlaid frames produces two simultaneous positional misperceptions of a single stimulus. That is, one stimulus is presented but two are perceived. In both experiments, a single red dot was flashed when the moving frames reversed direction, and participants were asked to report how many dots they saw. Naïve participants sometimes reported seeing two dots when only one was presented, indicating spontaneous perception of the illusion. A Bayesian analysis of the population prevalence of this effect was conducted. The dependence of this effect on the frames' speed, the dot's opacity, spatial attention, as the presence/absence of pre-flash motion ("postdiction") was also investigated, and the features of this illusion were compared to similar motion position illusions within a predictive processing framework. In demonstrating this illusory "splitting" effect, this study is the first to show that it is possible to be simultaneously aware of two opposing perceptual predictions about a single object and provides evidence of the hyperpriors that limit and inform the structure of visual experience.
Author Turner, William
Melling, Joseph
Hogendoorn, Hinze
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Joseph
  surname: Melling
  fullname: Melling, Joseph
  organization: Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, Monash Centre for Consciousness and Contemplative Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, joseph.melling@monash.edu
– sequence: 2
  givenname: William
  surname: Turner
  fullname: Turner, William
  organization: Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, w6.turner@qut.edu.au
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hinze
  surname: Hogendoorn
  fullname: Hogendoorn, Hinze
  organization: Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, hinze.hogendoorn@qut.edu.au
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39377741$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpVkU1PwzAMhiM0xD7gxB31iIQ6kiZtKBc0TXxJIC5wjrrUGZnapiTpJG77IfDn9kvItDHBya_sx68te4h6jWkAoVOCx4Rk_HJhluOEBT1OD9CApJTFnGZJ74_uo6FzC4wTnGJyhPo0p5xzRgboeWoa2VkLjY9asBJar00TGRVJU7fgdTOPWgullpu8u44m0Xr15dpK-9h5XXdV5yJQCqRfr76P0aEqKgcnuzhCb3e3r9OH-Onl_nE6eYolZdjHFBOQqkyKJA-NOMkAg2RKXfEyz4qcSExJBikrseKSl4TNZlKysoA8B6pUSkfoZuvbdrMaShm2t0UlWqvrwn4KU2jxv9LodzE3S0EIyyjHLDic7xys-ejAeVFrJ6GqigZM5wQNJEmTPMMBPfs7bD_l94gBuNgC0hrnLKg9QrDYvEiEF4mEBS1S-gNFLIhx
Cites_doi 10.1073/pnas.2102167118
10.1038/4580
10.1073/pnas.0808916105
10.1038/78878
10.1088/1741-2560/2/3/S05
10.1167/jov.21.11.14
10.1177/2041669517737561
10.1167/19.2.3
10.1167/jov.22.12.19
10.1038/scientificamerican1271-62
10.1073/pnas.1619788114
10.1068/p190611
10.1162/NECO_a_00226
10.1017/CBO9780511750540.019
10.1016/0042-6989(93)90008-K
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682737.001.0001
10.1016/j.visres.2003.10.028
10.1073/pnas.1500361112
10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.010
10.1016/0042-6989(91)90138-U
10.1162/08997660152002843
10.1126/science.1192788
10.1068/p270817
10.1017/CBO9781139087759
10.1167/19.1.3
10.7554/eLife.62461
10.1038/328645a0
10.1167/jov.22.12.5
10.1167/jov.24.2.6
10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.007
10.1167/19.13.9
10.1016/j.tics.2022.05.008
10.1038/11197
10.1126/science.287.5460.2036
10.1167/jov.23.10.8
10.1098/rstb.2005.1622
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright 2024 The Authors 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright 2024 The Authors 2024
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1167/jov.24.11.5
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
DocumentTitleAlternate Melling, Turner, & Hogendoorn
EISSN 1534-7362
ExternalDocumentID PMC11463704
39377741
10_1167_jov_24_11_5
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
29L
2WC
53G
5GY
5VS
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ABIVO
ACGFO
ADBBV
AENEX
AFPKN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BAWUL
BCNDV
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
F5P
FRP
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
KQ8
M~E
OK1
OVT
P2P
RNS
RPM
TR2
TRV
W2D
W8F
XSB
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-301ecfd2a29fec026e0ec4ff87d96a91c0316e54d0f7c7d14bbcc4dae99e3ff53
ISSN 1534-7362
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:35:25 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 11:10:41 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:07:54 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:31:14 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 11
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c340t-301ecfd2a29fec026e0ec4ff87d96a91c0316e54d0f7c7d14bbcc4dae99e3ff53
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.11.5
PMID 39377741
PQID 3114152960
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11463704
proquest_miscellaneous_3114152960
pubmed_primary_39377741
crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_24_11_5
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20241008
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-10-08
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2024
  text: 20241008
  day: 8
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)
PublicationTitleAlternate J Vis
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
Publisher_xml – name: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
References Rao (bib34) 2001; 13
Locke (bib27) 1974
Eagleman (bib13) 2000; 287
Helmholtz (bib18) 2005
Sceniak (bib35) 1999; 2
Kwon (bib25) 2015; 112
Adamian (bib1) 2024; 24
Ramachandran (bib32) 1990; 19
Sinico (bib36) 2009; 35
Anstis (bib4) 2017; 8
Alais (bib2) 2012; 3
De Valois (bib11) 1991; 31
Rao (bib33) 1999; 2
van Heusden (bib39) 2019; 19
Blom (bib7) 2019; 19
Attneave (bib5) 1971; 225
Özkan (bib30) 2021; 118
Takao (bib37) 2022; 22
Coffey (bib9) 2019; 19
Kanai (bib23) 2004; 44
Wojtach (bib41) 2008; 105
Gershman (bib15) 2012; 24
Friston (bib14) 2005; 360
Heeger (bib17) 2017; 114
Ince (bib21) 2021; 10
Nakayama (bib29) 2021; 21
Murakami (bib28) 1993; 33
Grush (bib16) 2005; 2
Kerzel (bib24) 2010
Anstis (bib3) 1998; 27
Hohwy (bib19) 2008; 108
Cavanagh (bib8a) 2022; 22
Diaz-Caneja (bib12) 1928; 165
Tenenbaum (bib38) 2011; 331
Cottier (bib10) 2023; 23
Whitney (bib40) 2000; 3
Ramachandran (bib31) 1987; 328
Ince (bib22) 2022
Hohwy (bib20) 2013
Cavanagh (bib8) 2013; 91
Lee (bib26) 2014
References_xml – volume: 118
  start-page: e2102167118
  issue: 25
  year: 2021
  ident: bib30
  article-title: Paradoxical stabilization of relative position in moving frames
  publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102167118
– volume-title: Treatise on Physiological Optics,
  year: 2005
  ident: bib18
– volume: 165
  start-page: 721
  year: 1928
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Sur l'alternance binoculaire [On binocular alternation]
  publication-title: Annales d'Oculistique,
– volume: 2
  start-page: 79
  issue: 1
  year: 1999
  ident: bib33
  article-title: Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects
  publication-title: Nature Neuroscience,
  doi: 10.1038/4580
– volume: 105
  start-page: 16338
  issue: 42
  year: 2008
  ident: bib41
  article-title: An empirical explanation of the flash-lag effect
  publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808916105
– volume: 3
  start-page: 954
  issue: 9
  year: 2000
  ident: bib40
  article-title: Motion distorts visual space: Shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects
  publication-title: Nature Neuroscience,
  doi: 10.1038/78878
– volume: 2
  start-page: S209
  issue: 3
  year: 2005
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Internal models and the construction of time: Generalizing from state estimation to trajectory estimation to address temporal features of perception, including temporal illusions
  publication-title: Journal of Neural Engineering,
  doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/2/3/S05
– volume: 21
  start-page: 14
  issue: 11
  year: 2021
  ident: bib29
  article-title: A dynamic noise background reveals perceptual motion extrapolation: The twinkle-goes illusion
  publication-title: Journal of Vision,
  doi: 10.1167/jov.21.11.14
– volume: 8
  start-page: 2041669517737561
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Moving backgrounds massively change the apparent size, shape and orientation of flashed test squares
  publication-title: i-Perception
  doi: 10.1177/2041669517737561
– volume: 19
  start-page: 3
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: bib7
  article-title: When predictions fail: Correction for extrapolation in the flash-grab effect
  publication-title: Journal of Vision,
  doi: 10.1167/19.2.3
– volume: 22
  start-page: 19
  issue: 12
  year: 2022
  ident: bib37
  article-title: A motion-induced position shift that depends on motion both before and after the test probe
  publication-title: Journal of Vision,
  doi: 10.1167/jov.22.12.19
– volume: 225
  start-page: 62
  issue: 6
  year: 1971
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Multistability in perception
  publication-title: Scientific American,
  doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1271-62
– volume: 114
  start-page: 1773
  issue: 8
  year: 2017
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Theory of cortical function
  publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619788114
– volume: 19
  start-page: 611
  issue: 5
  year: 1990
  ident: bib32
  article-title: Illusory displacement of equiluminous kinetic edges
  publication-title: Perception,
  doi: 10.1068/p190611
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Multistability and perceptual inference
  publication-title: Neural Computation,
  doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00226
– start-page: 321
  volume-title: Space and Time in Perception and Action
  year: 2010
  ident: bib24
  article-title: The Fröhlich effect: Past and present
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511750540.019
– volume: 33
  start-page: 2091
  issue: 15
  year: 1993
  ident: bib28
  article-title: Motion capture changes to induced motion at higher luminance contrasts, smaller eccentricities, and larger inducer sizes
  publication-title: Vision Research,
  doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90008-K
– volume-title: The predictive mind
  year: 2013
  ident: bib20
  doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682737.001.0001
– volume: 44
  start-page: 2605
  issue: 22
  year: 2004
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Stopping the motion and sleuthing the flash-lag effect: Spatial uncertainty is the key to perceptual mislocalization
  publication-title: Vision Research,
  doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.10.028
– volume: 112
  start-page: 8142
  issue: 26
  year: 2015
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Unifying account of visual motion and position perception
  publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500361112
– volume: 108
  start-page: 687
  issue: 3
  year: 2008
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: An epistemological review
  publication-title: Cognition,
  doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.010
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1619
  issue: 9
  year: 1991
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors
  publication-title: Vision research,
  doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90138-U
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1243
  issue: 6
  year: 2001
  ident: bib34
  article-title: Optimal smoothing in visual motion perception
  publication-title: Neural Computation,
  doi: 10.1162/08997660152002843
– volume: 331
  start-page: 1279
  year: 2011
  ident: bib38
  article-title: How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction
  publication-title: Science,
  doi: 10.1126/science.1192788
– volume: 27
  start-page: 817
  issue: 7
  year: 1998
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Picturing peripheral acuity
  publication-title: Perception,
  doi: 10.1068/p270817
– volume-title: Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course
  year: 2014
  ident: bib26
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139087759
– volume: 19
  start-page: 3
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: bib39
  article-title: Predictive coding of visual motion in both monocular and binocular human visual processing
  publication-title: Journal of Vision,
  doi: 10.1167/19.1.3
– volume: 10
  start-page: e62461
  year: 2021
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Bayesian inference of population prevalence
  publication-title: Elife,
  doi: 10.7554/eLife.62461
– volume: 328
  start-page: 645
  issue: 6131
  year: 1987
  ident: bib31
  article-title: Interaction between colour and motion in human vision
  publication-title: Nature,
  doi: 10.1038/328645a0
– volume-title: The Empiricists
  year: 1974
  ident: bib27
  article-title: An essay concerning human understanding (abridged)
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1
  issue: 12
  year: 2022
  ident: bib8a
  article-title: Exploring the frame effect
  publication-title: Journal of Vision,
  doi: 10.1167/jov.22.12.5
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1
  issue: 2
  year: 2024
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Sustained attention and the flash grab effect
  publication-title: Journal of Vision
  doi: 10.1167/jov.24.2.6
– volume: 91
  start-page: 8
  year: 2013
  ident: bib8
  article-title: The flash grab effect
  publication-title: Vision Research,
  doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.07.007
– volume: 19
  start-page: 9
  issue: 13
  year: 2019
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Expecting the unexpected: Temporal expectation increases the flash-grab effect
  publication-title: Journal of Vision,
  doi: 10.1167/19.13.9
– start-page: 626
  year: 2022
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Within-participant statistics for cognitive science
  publication-title: Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
  doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.05.008
– volume: 2
  start-page: 733
  issue: 8
  year: 1999
  ident: bib35
  article-title: Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons
  publication-title: Nature Neuroscience,
  doi: 10.1038/11197
– volume: 3
  start-page: 87
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Binocular rivalry: Competition and inhibition in visual perception
  publication-title: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science,
– volume: 287
  start-page: 2036
  issue: 5460
  year: 2000
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness
  publication-title: Science,
  doi: 10.1126/science.287.5460.2036
– volume: 35
  start-page: 948
  issue: 4
  year: 2009
  ident: bib36
  article-title: Perceived shrinkage of motion paths
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
– volume: 23
  start-page: 8
  issue: 10
  year: 2023
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Exploring the extent to which shared mechanisms contribute to motion-position illusions
  publication-title: Journal of Vision,
  doi: 10.1167/jov.23.10.8
– volume: 360
  start-page: 815
  issue: 1456
  year: 2005
  ident: bib14
  article-title: A theory of cortical responses
  publication-title: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,
  doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1622
SSID ssj0020501
Score 2.4152727
Snippet Visual illusions are systematic misperceptions that can help us glean the heuristics with which the brain constructs visual experience. In a recently...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 5
SubjectTerms Adult
Attention - physiology
Bayes Theorem
Female
Humans
Illusions - physiology
Male
Motion Perception - physiology
Optical Illusions - physiology
Photic Stimulation - methods
Young Adult
Title Concurrent perception of competing predictions: A “split-stimulus effect”
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39377741
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3114152960
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC11463704
Volume 24
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb5tAEF65qRTlUvVd9xHRqDnisssAprcoSuVWci9NpNwQ7M6qjhqwYsghh_72zu4ChtaV2l4QBryImY9hZme-WcbeSV4ECgF9WWDiAwUdfqGT1McUlNDzNA_sKhHLL_HiAj5fRpeTyddB1VJTFzN5t5NX8j9apWOkV8OS_QfN9oPSAdon_dKWNEzbv9LxaVXKtr_Sui9Q6QrFLZfZ9ABQK8td2DgS-rEQG3I8a5_e7evme7NpSzqOHXF3h6Pq6Oc23Wty81VN3umtoRDaGtl8NphMWKJt8T1ILfTlGzcts6ad4OnhVNHTqapyNcWLVXmHw4kIAa4Szn1HOuMJfhKOratjSHco4gNbGe224LHJIV9VtzMB9Gs2uooEtb62yjR9_Mhz5dvPWF9c2J26x-4Lih2M8Vv-OOuj8CAKeEvUpHu9H9zpgO13_x17Kb-FHr9W0A5ckvOH7EGrIu_EAeMRm2D5mO0v22qJJ-zTFh_eFh9epb0eH94AHx-8E-9ojA3PYePoKbv4eHZ-uvDbpTN8GUJQ-2S2UWolcpHSZRRnY4AStJ4nKo3zlEuy5TFGoAKdyERxKAopQeWYphhqHYXP2F5ZlfiCeQmP5lqZhcsgAi5xjpEAadr0IXIFMKUXvhVVtnYdUjIbWcZJRsLNBNB-Fk3Z206MGVkwk5bKS6yaTRZSSM5N-j-YsudOrP1AnT6mbD4SeH-B6Y4-PlOuvtku6YZuHyYBvPzjoK_YwRbHr9lefdPgG3Ix6-LQTs0cWuD8BNp1gS8
linkProvider ISSN International Centre
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concurrent+perception+of+competing+predictions%3A+A+%22split-stimulus+effect%22&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+vision+%28Charlottesville%2C+Va.%29&rft.au=Melling%2C+Joseph&rft.au=Turner%2C+William&rft.au=Hogendoorn%2C+Hinze&rft.date=2024-10-08&rft.eissn=1534-7362&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167%2Fjov.24.11.5&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F39377741&rft.externalDocID=39377741
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1534-7362&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1534-7362&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1534-7362&client=summon