Photoneutron and capture gamma dose calculations for a radiotherapy room made of high density concrete

Neutron and capture gamma ray dose equivalent along the maze and entrance door of a radiation therapy room made of high density concrete was calculated using analytical and Monte Carlo methods. The room geometry and the 18 MV photon beam of a Varian 2100C/D linac were simulated using MCNPX MC code....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNuclear Technology and Radiation Protection Vol. 26; no. 2; pp. 147 - 152
Main Authors Mesbahi, Asghar, Ghiasi, Hosein, Mahdavi, Rabee
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences 01.09.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Neutron and capture gamma ray dose equivalent along the maze and entrance door of a radiation therapy room made of high density concrete was calculated using analytical and Monte Carlo methods. The room geometry and the 18 MV photon beam of a Varian 2100C/D linac were simulated using MCNPX MC code. Four analytical methods including Kersey, French, McCall, and Wu-McGinley methods were used in the current study. Average difference of 13-30% was seen between analytical and MC methods along the maze for photoneutron calculations. The difference between Wu-McGinley and MC methods was about 17% for capture gamma ray calculations. It was concluded that the analytical methods overestimate both neutron and capture gamma ray dose equivalents compared to MC. Moreover, it was shown that the analytical methods can be used as conservative estimators for neutron and capture gamma calculations. Primenom analitickih i Monte Karlo metoda izracunate su ekvivalentne doze od neutrona i prateceg gama zracenja duz lavirinta i ulaznih vrata sobe za radioterapiju, nacinjene od betona velike gustine. Geometrija sobe i snop 18 MeV-skih fotona iz linearnog akceleratora Varian 2100C/D, simulirani su koriscenjem MCNPX Monte Karlo programa. Cetiri analiticke metode - Kersijeva, Frencova, Mekkolova i Vu-Mekginlijeva, koriscene su u ovoj studiji. Razlike izmedju analitickih i Monte Karlo metoda u proracunu fotoneutrona duz lavirinta iznosila su 13-30%, u srednjem. U proracunu prateceg gama zracenja, razlika izmedju Vu-Mekginlijeve metode i Monte Karlo simulacije bila je oko 17%. Zakljuceno je da analiticke metode uporedjene sa Monte Karlo simulacijom, precenjuju ekvivalentnu dozu i neutrona i prateceg gama zracenja, te da mogu biti upotrebljene u cilju konzervativne procene doza.
AbstractList Neutron and capture gamma ray dose equivalent along the maze and entrance door of a radiation therapy room made of high density concrete was calculated using analytical and Monte Carlo methods. The room geometry and the 18 MV photon beam of a Varian 2100C/D linac were simulated using MCNPX MC code. Four analytical methods including Kersey, French, McCall, and Wu-McGinley methods were used in the current study. Average difference of 13-30% was seen between analytical and MC methods along the maze for photoneutron calculations. The difference between Wu-McGinley and MC methods was about 17% for capture gamma ray calculations. It was concluded that the analytical methods overestimate both neutron and capture gamma ray dose equivalents compared to MC. Moreover, it was shown that the analytical methods can be used as conservative estimators for neutron and capture gamma calculations. Primenom analitickih i Monte Karlo metoda izracunate su ekvivalentne doze od neutrona i prateceg gama zracenja duz lavirinta i ulaznih vrata sobe za radioterapiju, nacinjene od betona velike gustine. Geometrija sobe i snop 18 MeV-skih fotona iz linearnog akceleratora Varian 2100C/D, simulirani su koriscenjem MCNPX Monte Karlo programa. Cetiri analiticke metode - Kersijeva, Frencova, Mekkolova i Vu-Mekginlijeva, koriscene su u ovoj studiji. Razlike izmedju analitickih i Monte Karlo metoda u proracunu fotoneutrona duz lavirinta iznosila su 13-30%, u srednjem. U proracunu prateceg gama zracenja, razlika izmedju Vu-Mekginlijeve metode i Monte Karlo simulacije bila je oko 17%. Zakljuceno je da analiticke metode uporedjene sa Monte Karlo simulacijom, precenjuju ekvivalentnu dozu i neutrona i prateceg gama zracenja, te da mogu biti upotrebljene u cilju konzervativne procene doza.
Neutron and capture gamma ray dose equivalent along the maze and entrance door of a radiation therapy room made of high density concrete was calculated using analytical and Monte Carlo methods. The room geometry and the 18 MV photon beam of a Varian 2100C/D linac were simulated using MCNPX MC code. Four analytical methods including Kersey, French, McCall, and Wu-McGinley methods were used in the current study. Average difference of 13-30% was seen between analytical and MC methods along the maze for photoneutron calculations. The difference between Wu-McGinley and MC methods was about 17% for capture gamma ray calculations. It was concluded that the analytical methods overestimate both neutron and capture gamma ray dose equivalents compared to MC. Moreover, it was shown that the analytical methods can be used as conservative estimators for neutron and capture gamma calculations.
Author Mesbahi, Asghar
Ghiasi, Hosein
Mahdavi, Rabee
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Asghar
  surname: Mesbahi
  fullname: Mesbahi, Asghar
  organization: Medical Physics Department, Medical School, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran + Radiation Therapy Department, Imam Hospital, Tabriz, Iran
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Hosein
  surname: Ghiasi
  fullname: Ghiasi, Hosein
  organization: Medical Physics Department, Medical School, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Rabee
  surname: Mahdavi
  fullname: Mahdavi, Rabee
  organization: Medical Physics Department, Medical School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
BookMark eNpN0MtOwzAQBVALFYm2sOMD_AEE_EocL1HFo1KBCpV15NjjJlUSV7a76N8TWoRYzeguzpXuDE0GPwBCt5TcM6bKh_fN55pSwqiQbxdoSkXOspKW-eT004wrJa7QLMYdIUIWeTFFbt34NCqHFPyA9WCx0ft0CIC3uu81tj7CGHXm0OnU-iFi5wPWOGjb-tRA0PsjDt73uNcWsHe4abcNtjDENh2x8YMJkOAaXTrdRbj5vXP09fy0Wbxmq4-X5eJxlRnOVcqAE0O1EZyz2kkmjOS5VMSUxlBBZMFLLoQBU0unOZUKcuVsCZJZy8GZgs_R8uxar3fVPrS9DsfK67Y6BT5sKx1SazqolGQ55EzWYPlYCErVlDJXKlYCUVKO1t3ZMsHHGMD9eZRUP3tX__fm3245dds
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_conbuildmat_2021_123915
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cemconcomp_2019_04_029
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rpor_2019_05_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radphyschem_2018_02_017
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radmeas_2012_03_016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rpor_2015_10_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rpor_2019_12_029
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOA
DOI 10.2298/NTRP1102147M
DatabaseName CrossRef
Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
EISSN 1452-8185
EndPage 152
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_9725e527bed3433e99b112f8928e0977
10_2298_NTRP1102147M
GroupedDBID 123
29N
2WC
53S
5VS
AAYXX
ABDBF
ACIWK
ADBBV
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BCNDV
C1A
CITATION
CS3
DU5
E3Z
FRP
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HH5
IPNFZ
KQ8
OK1
P6G
RIG
RNS
TR2
M~E
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-e30c1ac4332bf724c735790c8cc1407638344cecb7fa3179e59fd8e72dd3efc63
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1451-3994
IngestDate Tue Oct 22 15:14:36 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 03:32:03 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c339t-e30c1ac4332bf724c735790c8cc1407638344cecb7fa3179e59fd8e72dd3efc63
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/9725e527bed3433e99b112f8928e0977
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9725e527bed3433e99b112f8928e0977
crossref_primary_10_2298_NTRP1102147M
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2011-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2011-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2011
  text: 2011-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection
PublicationYear 2011
Publisher VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences
Publisher_xml – name: VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences
SSID ssj0047656
ssib051605284
Score 1.9601487
Snippet Neutron and capture gamma ray dose equivalent along the maze and entrance door of a radiation therapy room made of high density concrete was calculated using...
Neutron and capture gamma ray dose equivalent along the maze and entrance door of a radiation therapy room made of high density concrete was calculated using...
SourceID doaj
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
StartPage 147
SubjectTerms Monte Carlo modeling
photoneutrons
radiation therapy
Title Photoneutron and capture gamma dose calculations for a radiotherapy room made of high density concrete
URI https://doaj.org/article/9725e527bed3433e99b112f8928e0977
Volume 26
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3PS8MwFA6ykxdRVJw_Rg56LGvzo2mOKhsibAzZYLeSviQquB9s3WEX_3Zf2ir15MVLKaGU8F54-b7w8n2E3KZKFxmkmIEEbCSk51GWeRVJZFsM0pQlFVEcjdOnmXiey3nL6iv0hNXywHXg-lox6SRThbNccO60LhAi-EyzzMUIXqrqG-sWmcKVJBNE6ayyGw5OtBHuwqLuemdMZ_3x9GWSVJ7WavRrP2rJ9lf7y_CYHDXAkN7XEzohB255SvzkbRXUsnfhwJoi6adg1uHMn76axcJQu9o6HPqAxoRrSxGDUkM3xr43V6v2NGBjujDW0ZWnQZ6Y2tC1Xu4pcmEEjaU7I7PhYPr4FDXOCBFwrsvI8RgSA0F7rPCKCVBcKh1DBoCECUtGcM8AB4XyBgGCdlJ7mznFrOXOQ8rPSWeJs78gFISzMjYJSCuE5dUb5oeDEJx5H3fJ3Xd88nUtgJEjcQhxzNtx7JKHELyfb4JsdTWAycybZOZ_JfPyP35yRQ7rg9_QCHZNOuVm524QOZRFr1okvVC9JT5Hn4MvIfXATQ
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,867,2109,27936,27937
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Photoneutron+and+capture+gamma+dose+calculations+for+a+radiotherapy+room+made+of+high+density+concrete&rft.jtitle=Nuclear+Technology+and+Radiation+Protection&rft.au=Mesbahi+Asghar&rft.au=Ghiasi+Hosein&rft.au=Mahdavi+Rabee+Seyed&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.pub=VINCA+Institute+of+Nuclear+Sciences&rft.issn=1451-3994&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=152&rft_id=info:doi/10.2298%2FNTRP1102147M&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_9725e527bed3433e99b112f8928e0977
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1451-3994&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1451-3994&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1451-3994&client=summon