A review of recent developments in ecosystem assessment and its role in policy evolution
•The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services shapes current assessments.•At least 10 countries have undertaken national assessment with many more keen to follow.•A UK case study shows how a national ecosystem assessment can trigger a series of policy initiatives. As ecosyst...
Saved in:
Published in | Current opinion in environmental sustainability Vol. 29; pp. 57 - 62 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier B.V
01.12.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1877-3435 1877-3443 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.11.006 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services shapes current assessments.•At least 10 countries have undertaken national assessment with many more keen to follow.•A UK case study shows how a national ecosystem assessment can trigger a series of policy initiatives.
As ecosystem assessments represent syntheses of knowledge on ecosystem status created to answer key policy questions, it is important to identify whether the dialogue between assessment practitioners and policy makers is delivering the goals which ecosystem assessment practitioners seek. A number of global and national ecosystem assessment processes are underway between now and 2020, and best practice in creating assessments which have stakeholder buy in and policy relevance is subject to continuing refinement. While there are few unequivocal examples of assessments driving policy change (due to political decision-making processes being affected by a multiplicity of considerations beyond the availability of evidence), building a strong case around which assessments have informed policy development will enhance future legitimacy of ecosystem assessments in political dialogue. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1877-3435 1877-3443 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.11.006 |