Spherical Mexican hat wavelet: an application to detect non-Gaussianity in the COBE-DMR maps

The spherical Mexican hat wavelet is introduced in this paper, with the aim of testing the Gaussianity of the cosmic microwave background temperature fluctuations. Using the information given by the wavelet coefficients at several scales, we have performed several statistical tests on the COBE-DMR m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMonthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Vol. 326; no. 4; pp. 1243 - 1248
Main Authors Cayón, L., Sanz, J.L., Martínez-González, E., Banday, A.J., Argüeso, F., Gallegos, J.E., Górski, K.M., Hinshaw, G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.10.2001
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The spherical Mexican hat wavelet is introduced in this paper, with the aim of testing the Gaussianity of the cosmic microwave background temperature fluctuations. Using the information given by the wavelet coefficients at several scales, we have performed several statistical tests on the COBE-DMR maps to search for evidence of non-Gaussianity. Skewness, kurtosis, scale–scale correlations (for two and three scales) and Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests indicate that the COBE-DMR data are consistent with a Gaussian distribution. We have extended the analysis to compare temperature values provided by COBE-DMR data with distributions (obtained from Gaussian simulations) at each pixel and at each scale. The number of pixels with temperature values outside the 95 and 99 per cent limits is consistent with that obtained from Gaussian simulations, at all scales. Moreover, the extrema values for COBE-DMR data (maximum and minimum temperatures in the map) are also consistent with those obtained from Gaussian simulations.
Bibliography:istex:BCD3B4C27A4F45E024E8CFF91488B0DE29C96604
ark:/67375/HXZ-CJ7DQ7SC-N
1
Note that this differs slightly from the treatment by
2
Barreiro et al. (2000)
http://www.eso.org/kgorski/healpix/
It has been checked that, in the formalism used in that paper, removing monopole and dipole does not affect the results.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0035-8711
1365-2966
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2001.04641.x