The Accident of Accessibility: How the Data of the TEF Creates Neoliberal Subjects
In an era of neoliberal reforms, academics in UK universities have become increasingly enmeshed in audit. A new Teaching Excellent Framework (TEF) emerged in 2017 with results determined primarily by proxy data of National Student Survey (NSS) scores, retention data and Longitudinal Educational Outc...
Saved in:
Published in | Social epistemology Vol. 33; no. 4; pp. 355 - 366 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Abingdon
Routledge
04.07.2019
Taylor & Francis LLC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0269-1728 1464-5297 |
DOI | 10.1080/02691728.2019.1638991 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | In an era of neoliberal reforms, academics in UK universities have become increasingly enmeshed in audit. A new Teaching Excellent Framework (TEF) emerged in 2017 with results determined primarily by proxy data of National Student Survey (NSS) scores, retention data and Longitudinal Educational Outcomes data (LEO). The TEF has been rapidly repurposed in order to shape the behaviour and priorities of both students and academics. The discourse of the TEF legislation, bolstered by studies from HEA/HEPI, assumes the source of inequality of outcome is poor teaching requiring corrective action by universities. Further justification for surveillance and quasi-regulation is borne by appeals to 'value for money' and 'competition'. I argue that what seems to be an arbitrary constellation of proxy data points has in fact been a calculated plan to render universities, staff and students as neoliberal subjects. The accident of accessibility, inasmuch as it overlaps with the neoliberal imperative, has determined which data shall function as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and the whole assemblage is cemented by discursive choices which align with neoliberal principles. The Government White Paper Success as a Knowledge Economy, May 2016, forms the text for corpus analysis of keywords, discourses and metaphors.
Abbreviation: BIS: HM Government Department of Business, Innovation and Skills; BME: Black and Minority Ethnic; DLHE: Destinations of Leavers from Higher Education; HEI: Higher Education Institution; HERA: Higher Education and Research Act; HESA: Higher Education Statistics Agency; HEA: Higher Education Academy; Hefce: Higher Education Funding Council for England; HEPI: Higher Education Policy Institute; HND: Higher National Diploma; KEF: Knowledge Exchange Framework; KPI: Key Performance Indicator; LEO: Longitudinal Educational Outcomes; NSS: National Student Survey; NUS: national Union of Students; OfS: Office for Students; POLAR: participation of local areas; QAA: Quality Assurance Agency; RAB: Resource Accounting and Budgeting; REF: Research Excellence Framework; ROI: Return on Investment; SDS: Strategically Deployable Shifter; SKE: Success in a Knowledge Economy; TEF: Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes Framework; WP: Widening Participation |
---|---|
AbstractList | In an era of neoliberal reforms, academics in UK universities have become increasingly enmeshed in audit. A new Teaching Excellent Framework (TEF) emerged in 2017 with results determined primarily by proxy data of National Student Survey (NSS) scores, retention data and Longitudinal Educational Outcomes data (LEO). The TEF has been rapidly repurposed in order to shape the behaviour and priorities of both students and academics. The discourse of the TEF legislation, bolstered by studies from HEA/HEPI, assumes the source of inequality of outcome is poor teaching requiring corrective action by universities. Further justification for surveillance and quasi-regulation is borne by appeals to 'value for money' and 'competition'. I argue that what seems to be an arbitrary constellation of proxy data points has in fact been a calculated plan to render universities, staff and students as neoliberal subjects. The accident of accessibility, inasmuch as it overlaps with the neoliberal imperative, has determined which data shall function as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and the whole assemblage is cemented by discursive choices which align with neoliberal principles. The Government White Paper Success as a Knowledge Economy, May 2016, forms the text for corpus analysis of keywords, discourses and metaphors.
Abbreviation: BIS: HM Government Department of Business, Innovation and Skills; BME: Black and Minority Ethnic; DLHE: Destinations of Leavers from Higher Education; HEI: Higher Education Institution; HERA: Higher Education and Research Act; HESA: Higher Education Statistics Agency; HEA: Higher Education Academy; Hefce: Higher Education Funding Council for England; HEPI: Higher Education Policy Institute; HND: Higher National Diploma; KEF: Knowledge Exchange Framework; KPI: Key Performance Indicator; LEO: Longitudinal Educational Outcomes; NSS: National Student Survey; NUS: national Union of Students; OfS: Office for Students; POLAR: participation of local areas; QAA: Quality Assurance Agency; RAB: Resource Accounting and Budgeting; REF: Research Excellence Framework; ROI: Return on Investment; SDS: Strategically Deployable Shifter; SKE: Success in a Knowledge Economy; TEF: Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes Framework; WP: Widening Participation In an era of neoliberal reforms, academics in UK universities have become increasingly enmeshed in audit. A new Teaching Excellent Framework (TEF) emerged in 2017 with results determined primarily by proxy data of National Student Survey (NSS) scores, retention data and Longitudinal Educational Outcomes data (LEO). The TEF has been rapidly repurposed in order to shape the behaviour and priorities of both students and academics. The discourse of the TEF legislation, bolstered by studies from HEA/HEPI, assumes the source of inequality of outcome is poor teaching requiring corrective action by universities. Further justification for surveillance and quasi-regulation is borne by appeals to 'value for money' and 'competition'. I argue that what seems to be an arbitrary constellation of proxy data points has in fact been a calculated plan to render universities, staff and students as neoliberal subjects. The accident of accessibility, inasmuch as it overlaps with the neoliberal imperative, has determined which data shall function as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and the whole assemblage is cemented by discursive choices which align with neoliberal principles. The Government White Paper Success as a Knowledge Economy, May 2016, forms the text for corpus analysis of keywords, discourses and metaphors.Abbreviation: BIS: HM Government Department of Business, Innovation and Skills; BME: Black and Minority Ethnic; DLHE: Destinations of Leavers from Higher Education; HEI: Higher Education Institution; HERA: Higher Education and Research Act; HESA: Higher Education Statistics Agency; HEA: Higher Education Academy; Hefce: Higher Education Funding Council for England; HEPI: Higher Education Policy Institute; HND: Higher National Diploma; KEF: Knowledge Exchange Framework; KPI: Key Performance Indicator; LEO: Longitudinal Educational Outcomes; NSS: National Student Survey; NUS: national Union of Students; OfS: Office for Students; POLAR: participation of local areas; QAA: Quality Assurance Agency; RAB: Resource Accounting and Budgeting; REF: Research Excellence Framework; ROI: Return on Investment; SDS: Strategically Deployable Shifter; SKE: Success in a Knowledge Economy; TEF: Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes Framework; WP: Widening Participation |
Author | Morrish, Liz |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Liz orcidid: 0000-0002-5707-2385 surname: Morrish fullname: Morrish, Liz email: lizmorrish@aol.com organization: School of Languages and Linguistics, York St John University |
BookMark | eNqFkE1LAzEQhoNUsK3-BGHB89Z87G6yerHU1gpFQes5ZLMTTNluapJS-u_t0nrxoKd5YZ53Bp4B6rWuBYSuCR4RLPAtpkVJOBUjikk5IgUTZUnOUJ9kRZbmtOQ91O-YtIMu0CCEFcaYC5r10dvyE5Kx1raGNibOdBlCsJVtbNzfJXO3S-IBeVRRdesuL6ezZOJBRQjJC7jGVuBVk7xvqxXoGC7RuVFNgKvTHKKP2XQ5maeL16fnyXiRasZETA0nPBNa51oXOMeGAxQCZ6YwBCsQmTG4AiJyAQp4UQtWc0VrXRGlDCs5Y0N0c7y78e5rCyHKldv69vBSUlpkGc9pXh6o-yOlvQvBg5HaRhWta6NXtpEEy06i_JEoO4nyJPHQzn-1N96uld__23s49mxrnF-rnfNNLaPaN84br1ptg2R_n_gG-UeJww |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1108_IJSHE_08_2020_0315 crossref_primary_10_1177_10353046211003635 crossref_primary_10_1080_15427587_2023_2187394 crossref_primary_10_1080_02680939_2020_1725983 crossref_primary_10_1177_0038026121999209 crossref_primary_10_1177_14782103241240542 crossref_primary_10_1080_09540253_2021_1884194 crossref_primary_10_1177_02610183211024820 crossref_primary_10_1111_1469_8676_13097 crossref_primary_10_5334_ijelt_77 crossref_primary_10_1177_1757743820986173 |
Cites_doi | 10.1057/978-1-137-55649-3 10.1057/9780230000612 10.4135/9781473910270 10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363 10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908 10.1080/02680930500108585 10.1080/13562510902898841 10.4324/9781315561592 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2019 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2019 – notice: 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7U4 8BJ BHHNA DWI FQK JBE WZK |
DOI | 10.1080/02691728.2019.1638991 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Sociological Abstracts Sociological Abstracts International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences Sociological Abstracts (Ovid) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Sociological Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017) |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Philosophy Social Sciences (General) |
EISSN | 1464-5297 |
EndPage | 366 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1080_02691728_2019_1638991 1638991 |
Genre | Article |
GroupedDBID | -DZ -ET .7I .QK 0BK 0R~ 123 4.4 5VS AACJB AAGZJ AAMFJ AAMIU AAPUL AATTQ AAZMC ABCCR ABCCY ABFIM ABJNI ABLIJ ABPEM ABTAI ABXUL ABXYU ABZLS ACGFS ACHQT ACJZB ACNCT ACTIO ACTOA ADAHI ADCVX ADKVQ ADLRE ADXPE AECIN AEISY AEKEX AEOZL AEPSL AEYOC AEZRU AGDLA AGMYJ AGRBW AHDZW AIJEM AJWEG AKBVH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU AVBZW AWYRJ BEJHT BLEHA BMOTO BOHLJ CCCUG CQ1 CS3 DGFLZ DKSSO EBS EJD E~B E~C G-F GTTXZ H13 HF~ HZ~ IPNFZ J.O KYCEM LJTGL M4Z NA5 NV0 O9- P2P RIG RNANH ROSJB RSYQP S-F S10 STATR TBQAZ TDBHL TEA TFH TFL TFW TNTFI TRJHH TUROJ UT5 UT9 VAE YNT ~01 ~S~ AAGDL AAHIA AAYXX ADYSH AEFOU AFRVT AIYEW AMPGV CITATION 7U4 8BJ BHHNA DWI FQK JBE TASJS WZK |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f71748cc5cc6050f7ee6804f6f10ae84ff0be1858eae76d83d7a2dcb1aaf39733 |
ISSN | 0269-1728 |
IngestDate | Sat Jul 26 02:37:24 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:58 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:10:30 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 25 09:09:15 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c338t-f71748cc5cc6050f7ee6804f6f10ae84ff0be1858eae76d83d7a2dcb1aaf39733 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-5707-2385 |
PQID | 2264475259 |
PQPubID | 53214 |
PageCount | 12 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_02691728_2019_1638991 proquest_journals_2264475259 crossref_primary_10_1080_02691728_2019_1638991 informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_02691728_2019_1638991 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-07-04 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-07-04 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2019 text: 2019-07-04 day: 04 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Abingdon |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Abingdon |
PublicationTitle | Social epistemology |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | Routledge Taylor & Francis LLC |
Publisher_xml | – name: Routledge – name: Taylor & Francis LLC |
References | CIT0030 CIT0010 CIT0042 CIT0012 Morozov E. (CIT0027) 2014 Scott M. (CIT0038) 2014 Morrish L. (CIT0028) 2019 CIT0003 CIT0026 CIT0037 CIT0029 |
References_xml | – ident: CIT0003 doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-55649-3 – ident: CIT0012 doi: 10.1057/9780230000612 – ident: CIT0037 doi: 10.4135/9781473910270 – ident: CIT0042 doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363 – ident: CIT0010 doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908 – ident: CIT0029 doi: 10.1080/02680930500108585 – volume-title: WordSmith Tools year: 2014 ident: CIT0038 – ident: CIT0030 – ident: CIT0026 doi: 10.1080/13562510902898841 – volume-title: To Save Everything, Click Here year: 2014 ident: CIT0027 – volume-title: Academic Irregularities: Language and Neoliberalism in Higher Education year: 2019 ident: CIT0028 doi: 10.4324/9781315561592 |
SSID | ssj0007824 |
Score | 2.2090442 |
Snippet | In an era of neoliberal reforms, academics in UK universities have become increasingly enmeshed in audit. A new Teaching Excellent Framework (TEF) emerged in... |
SourceID | proquest crossref informaworld |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 355 |
SubjectTerms | Academic achievement Academic staff Access Accidents Audit Budgets Business metrics College students Colleges & universities Data Destinations discourse Discourses Education policy Ethnicity Government agencies Higher education Inequality Innovations Investments Justification Knowledge economy Legislation metrics Money Neoliberalism Participation Performance indicators Polls & surveys Quality control Research transfer Return on investment Students Surveillance Teaching Teaching Excellence Framework |
Title | The Accident of Accessibility: How the Data of the TEF Creates Neoliberal Subjects |
URI | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02691728.2019.1638991 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2264475259 |
Volume | 33 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Bb9MwFLbGdtkFsQ1EYUM-cAAhV2niJjG3amtVoW0glIqKi2U79gnaac0O7NfzXmy3jTox4BJFSZ1Wfl-e33Pf-z5C3nIHq44qa-aEqhl3xjJl65Lp1OlUCaeSAhuFr67z6Yx_mg_nUd49dJc0um_uH-wr-R-rwjWwK3bJ_oNl1w-FC3AO9oUjWBiOf23jkTGoC9r-oT9q1Q99vWvL5NQKxsGHLlSjYjVANZ58OMdQ0aKLW7b1JUgJcqdxS2a1Ha2G3l17g1j42dmAv1reoja9T-vvt_cO2nYllmz2DqsdGY-1VLH3QGkuGApY-cXCe0iec8hefVFtdKGeyyJAhW_5w8xz8O746VDYCM_Hx2OFnehjZCi8dFeXF_v6s5zMLi9lNZ5XT8hBCgkBuOCD0fTi-7f1qguRDvf7af4nx24t5FF_6Gs6cUiHpXZnVW5DjeoZeRpyBDryBj8ie3ZxTA6_RNGJX8ek5y1Dg2de0XeBPvz9CfkKqKARFXTpaAcVHylgggIOKGICb-M5YIIGTNANJmjExHMym4yr8ykLyhnMZFnZMAdJOi-NGRoD6WriCmvzMuEud4NE2ZI7l2gLkVpplS3yuszqQqW10QOlHASoWfaC7C-WC_uSUJFwm0NO7bQYcJPlOin1kKcGhwuT8h7hcR6lCbTyqG7yQw4i-2yYfonTL8P090h_PezG86o8NkBsG0k2LXadh63MHhl7Gi0qw-u7kthBzoshpP-v_nz7NTncvDunZL-5vbNnEIk2-k0A4W8KBoED |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LTwIxEG6MHPTiAzXiswcPelhcdruPeiMoWRGIIZB4a9pue9GAkSVGf72d3S4BjeHArUkzk912Oq98M4PQFdHG6vA4dTTlqUO0VA5XaewITwuPU83dCAqFe_0wGZHOS_CyUAsDsEqIoXXRKCLX1fC4IRldQuJuTdxAYa4SILNoHTwKCgXslYAS30h5ZTjoJMlcHxsbSIpMC3WAqqzj-Y_RkoVa6l_6R1_nRqi9i2T5-QX25LU-y0Rdfv_q7Lje_-2hHeuj4mYhVPtoQ42raPu5HHrwVUW1oqoXW80wxde2ffXNARoYycNNKWFaaYYnGtaAtc1RuF93OJl8YuN14nuecdiG9fChjVvgvhpWfTXJMS_AfiYgTTQ9RKP2w7CVOHZygyNNyJs52gSJJJYykNKES66OlApjl-hQN1yuYqK1K5TxFGLFVRSmsZ9G3EulaHCujYPk-0doczwZq2OEqUtUaGI6LWiDSD8UbiwC4kkgp9IjNUTK22LStjWH6RpvrFF2P7WnyeA0mT3NGqrPyd6Lvh6rCOiiKLAsT6joYvoJ81fQnpVyw6yKmDKoYCZRYMLPkzVYX6KtZNjrsu5j_-kUbcNWDiYmZ2gz-5ipc-MyZeLCvokfS8wHVQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fT9swED6hIqG-sAGb6IDNDzywh3Rp4vzw3hBQZbBVVVWkvVm243sBtRVNheCvx5c4iG5CPPAWybpT4pzv7rO-uwM45uiijsrLAIUqA47GBsqWeaAj1JESqMKMCoX_jNLiml_-TVo24dLTKglDY9MoovbVdLgXJbaMuB8ONggaq0TELNGnhEJQ_fpm6uJR0oHN6eSyKJ7dsQuBvLloEQFJtWU8rylaC1Br7Uv_c9d1DBp-AN2-fUM9uemvKt03j_80dnzX532EbZ-hstPGpHZgw852oTtuRx487EKvqell3i8s2YlvXv19DybO7tipMTSrtGJzpGdi2tYc3IefrJjfM5dzsnNVKVqm5-nFkJ1R8upUjey8ZryQ-pWmS6LlJ7geXkzPisDPbQiMA7xVgA4i8tyYxBgHlkLMrE3zkGOKg1DZnCOG2ro8IbfKZmmZx2WmotLogVLo0qM4_gyd2Xxm94GJkNvUITrUYsBNnOow1wmPDIkLE_Ee8PZnSeObmtNsjVs5aHuf-t2UtJvS72YP-s9ii6arx1sC4qUlyKq-TsFm9omM35A9bM1GegexlFS_zLPEgc8v71D9DbbG50P5-9fo6gC6tFIzifkhdKq7lT1y-VKlv_oT8QT4HwX5 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Accident+of+Accessibility%3A+How+the+Data+of+the+TEF+Creates+Neoliberal+Subjects&rft.jtitle=Social+epistemology&rft.au=Morrish%2C+Liz&rft.date=2019-07-04&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis+LLC&rft.issn=0269-1728&rft.eissn=1464-5297&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=355&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F02691728.2019.1638991&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0269-1728&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0269-1728&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0269-1728&client=summon |