The Accident of Accessibility: How the Data of the TEF Creates Neoliberal Subjects

In an era of neoliberal reforms, academics in UK universities have become increasingly enmeshed in audit. A new Teaching Excellent Framework (TEF) emerged in 2017 with results determined primarily by proxy data of National Student Survey (NSS) scores, retention data and Longitudinal Educational Outc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocial epistemology Vol. 33; no. 4; pp. 355 - 366
Main Author Morrish, Liz
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 04.07.2019
Taylor & Francis LLC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0269-1728
1464-5297
DOI10.1080/02691728.2019.1638991

Cover

Loading…
Abstract In an era of neoliberal reforms, academics in UK universities have become increasingly enmeshed in audit. A new Teaching Excellent Framework (TEF) emerged in 2017 with results determined primarily by proxy data of National Student Survey (NSS) scores, retention data and Longitudinal Educational Outcomes data (LEO). The TEF has been rapidly repurposed in order to shape the behaviour and priorities of both students and academics. The discourse of the TEF legislation, bolstered by studies from HEA/HEPI, assumes the source of inequality of outcome is poor teaching requiring corrective action by universities. Further justification for surveillance and quasi-regulation is borne by appeals to 'value for money' and 'competition'. I argue that what seems to be an arbitrary constellation of proxy data points has in fact been a calculated plan to render universities, staff and students as neoliberal subjects. The accident of accessibility, inasmuch as it overlaps with the neoliberal imperative, has determined which data shall function as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and the whole assemblage is cemented by discursive choices which align with neoliberal principles. The Government White Paper Success as a Knowledge Economy, May 2016, forms the text for corpus analysis of keywords, discourses and metaphors. Abbreviation: BIS: HM Government Department of Business, Innovation and Skills; BME: Black and Minority Ethnic; DLHE: Destinations of Leavers from Higher Education; HEI: Higher Education Institution; HERA: Higher Education and Research Act; HESA: Higher Education Statistics Agency; HEA: Higher Education Academy; Hefce: Higher Education Funding Council for England; HEPI: Higher Education Policy Institute; HND: Higher National Diploma; KEF: Knowledge Exchange Framework; KPI: Key Performance Indicator; LEO: Longitudinal Educational Outcomes; NSS: National Student Survey; NUS: national Union of Students; OfS: Office for Students; POLAR: participation of local areas; QAA: Quality Assurance Agency; RAB: Resource Accounting and Budgeting; REF: Research Excellence Framework; ROI: Return on Investment; SDS: Strategically Deployable Shifter; SKE: Success in a Knowledge Economy; TEF: Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes Framework; WP: Widening Participation
AbstractList In an era of neoliberal reforms, academics in UK universities have become increasingly enmeshed in audit. A new Teaching Excellent Framework (TEF) emerged in 2017 with results determined primarily by proxy data of National Student Survey (NSS) scores, retention data and Longitudinal Educational Outcomes data (LEO). The TEF has been rapidly repurposed in order to shape the behaviour and priorities of both students and academics. The discourse of the TEF legislation, bolstered by studies from HEA/HEPI, assumes the source of inequality of outcome is poor teaching requiring corrective action by universities. Further justification for surveillance and quasi-regulation is borne by appeals to 'value for money' and 'competition'. I argue that what seems to be an arbitrary constellation of proxy data points has in fact been a calculated plan to render universities, staff and students as neoliberal subjects. The accident of accessibility, inasmuch as it overlaps with the neoliberal imperative, has determined which data shall function as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and the whole assemblage is cemented by discursive choices which align with neoliberal principles. The Government White Paper Success as a Knowledge Economy, May 2016, forms the text for corpus analysis of keywords, discourses and metaphors. Abbreviation: BIS: HM Government Department of Business, Innovation and Skills; BME: Black and Minority Ethnic; DLHE: Destinations of Leavers from Higher Education; HEI: Higher Education Institution; HERA: Higher Education and Research Act; HESA: Higher Education Statistics Agency; HEA: Higher Education Academy; Hefce: Higher Education Funding Council for England; HEPI: Higher Education Policy Institute; HND: Higher National Diploma; KEF: Knowledge Exchange Framework; KPI: Key Performance Indicator; LEO: Longitudinal Educational Outcomes; NSS: National Student Survey; NUS: national Union of Students; OfS: Office for Students; POLAR: participation of local areas; QAA: Quality Assurance Agency; RAB: Resource Accounting and Budgeting; REF: Research Excellence Framework; ROI: Return on Investment; SDS: Strategically Deployable Shifter; SKE: Success in a Knowledge Economy; TEF: Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes Framework; WP: Widening Participation
In an era of neoliberal reforms, academics in UK universities have become increasingly enmeshed in audit. A new Teaching Excellent Framework (TEF) emerged in 2017 with results determined primarily by proxy data of National Student Survey (NSS) scores, retention data and Longitudinal Educational Outcomes data (LEO). The TEF has been rapidly repurposed in order to shape the behaviour and priorities of both students and academics. The discourse of the TEF legislation, bolstered by studies from HEA/HEPI, assumes the source of inequality of outcome is poor teaching requiring corrective action by universities. Further justification for surveillance and quasi-regulation is borne by appeals to 'value for money' and 'competition'. I argue that what seems to be an arbitrary constellation of proxy data points has in fact been a calculated plan to render universities, staff and students as neoliberal subjects. The accident of accessibility, inasmuch as it overlaps with the neoliberal imperative, has determined which data shall function as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and the whole assemblage is cemented by discursive choices which align with neoliberal principles. The Government White Paper Success as a Knowledge Economy, May 2016, forms the text for corpus analysis of keywords, discourses and metaphors.Abbreviation: BIS: HM Government Department of Business, Innovation and Skills; BME: Black and Minority Ethnic; DLHE: Destinations of Leavers from Higher Education; HEI: Higher Education Institution; HERA: Higher Education and Research Act; HESA: Higher Education Statistics Agency; HEA: Higher Education Academy; Hefce: Higher Education Funding Council for England; HEPI: Higher Education Policy Institute; HND: Higher National Diploma; KEF: Knowledge Exchange Framework; KPI: Key Performance Indicator; LEO: Longitudinal Educational Outcomes; NSS: National Student Survey; NUS: national Union of Students; OfS: Office for Students; POLAR: participation of local areas; QAA: Quality Assurance Agency; RAB: Resource Accounting and Budgeting; REF: Research Excellence Framework; ROI: Return on Investment; SDS: Strategically Deployable Shifter; SKE: Success in a Knowledge Economy; TEF: Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes Framework; WP: Widening Participation
Author Morrish, Liz
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Liz
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5707-2385
  surname: Morrish
  fullname: Morrish, Liz
  email: lizmorrish@aol.com
  organization: School of Languages and Linguistics, York St John University
BookMark eNqFkE1LAzEQhoNUsK3-BGHB89Z87G6yerHU1gpFQes5ZLMTTNluapJS-u_t0nrxoKd5YZ53Bp4B6rWuBYSuCR4RLPAtpkVJOBUjikk5IgUTZUnOUJ9kRZbmtOQ91O-YtIMu0CCEFcaYC5r10dvyE5Kx1raGNibOdBlCsJVtbNzfJXO3S-IBeVRRdesuL6ezZOJBRQjJC7jGVuBVk7xvqxXoGC7RuVFNgKvTHKKP2XQ5maeL16fnyXiRasZETA0nPBNa51oXOMeGAxQCZ6YwBCsQmTG4AiJyAQp4UQtWc0VrXRGlDCs5Y0N0c7y78e5rCyHKldv69vBSUlpkGc9pXh6o-yOlvQvBg5HaRhWta6NXtpEEy06i_JEoO4nyJPHQzn-1N96uld__23s49mxrnF-rnfNNLaPaN84br1ptg2R_n_gG-UeJww
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1108_IJSHE_08_2020_0315
crossref_primary_10_1177_10353046211003635
crossref_primary_10_1080_15427587_2023_2187394
crossref_primary_10_1080_02680939_2020_1725983
crossref_primary_10_1177_0038026121999209
crossref_primary_10_1177_14782103241240542
crossref_primary_10_1080_09540253_2021_1884194
crossref_primary_10_1177_02610183211024820
crossref_primary_10_1111_1469_8676_13097
crossref_primary_10_5334_ijelt_77
crossref_primary_10_1177_1757743820986173
Cites_doi 10.1057/978-1-137-55649-3
10.1057/9780230000612
10.4135/9781473910270
10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363
10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908
10.1080/02680930500108585
10.1080/13562510902898841
10.4324/9781315561592
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2019
2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
Copyright_xml – notice: 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2019
– notice: 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7U4
8BJ
BHHNA
DWI
FQK
JBE
WZK
DOI 10.1080/02691728.2019.1638991
DatabaseName CrossRef
Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
Sociological Abstracts
Sociological Abstracts
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
Sociological Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList
Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Philosophy
Social Sciences (General)
EISSN 1464-5297
EndPage 366
ExternalDocumentID 10_1080_02691728_2019_1638991
1638991
Genre Article
GroupedDBID -DZ
-ET
.7I
.QK
0BK
0R~
123
4.4
5VS
AACJB
AAGZJ
AAMFJ
AAMIU
AAPUL
AATTQ
AAZMC
ABCCR
ABCCY
ABFIM
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABPEM
ABTAI
ABXUL
ABXYU
ABZLS
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACJZB
ACNCT
ACTIO
ACTOA
ADAHI
ADCVX
ADKVQ
ADLRE
ADXPE
AECIN
AEISY
AEKEX
AEOZL
AEPSL
AEYOC
AEZRU
AGDLA
AGMYJ
AGRBW
AHDZW
AIJEM
AJWEG
AKBVH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
AVBZW
AWYRJ
BEJHT
BLEHA
BMOTO
BOHLJ
CCCUG
CQ1
CS3
DGFLZ
DKSSO
EBS
EJD
E~B
E~C
G-F
GTTXZ
H13
HF~
HZ~
IPNFZ
J.O
KYCEM
LJTGL
M4Z
NA5
NV0
O9-
P2P
RIG
RNANH
ROSJB
RSYQP
S-F
S10
STATR
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TEA
TFH
TFL
TFW
TNTFI
TRJHH
TUROJ
UT5
UT9
VAE
YNT
~01
~S~
AAGDL
AAHIA
AAYXX
ADYSH
AEFOU
AFRVT
AIYEW
AMPGV
CITATION
7U4
8BJ
BHHNA
DWI
FQK
JBE
TASJS
WZK
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-f71748cc5cc6050f7ee6804f6f10ae84ff0be1858eae76d83d7a2dcb1aaf39733
ISSN 0269-1728
IngestDate Sat Jul 26 02:37:24 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:53:58 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:10:30 EDT 2025
Wed Dec 25 09:09:15 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c338t-f71748cc5cc6050f7ee6804f6f10ae84ff0be1858eae76d83d7a2dcb1aaf39733
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ORCID 0000-0002-5707-2385
PQID 2264475259
PQPubID 53214
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_02691728_2019_1638991
proquest_journals_2264475259
crossref_primary_10_1080_02691728_2019_1638991
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_02691728_2019_1638991
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2019-07-04
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2019-07-04
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2019
  text: 2019-07-04
  day: 04
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Abingdon
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Abingdon
PublicationTitle Social epistemology
PublicationYear 2019
Publisher Routledge
Taylor & Francis LLC
Publisher_xml – name: Routledge
– name: Taylor & Francis LLC
References CIT0030
CIT0010
CIT0042
CIT0012
Morozov E. (CIT0027) 2014
Scott M. (CIT0038) 2014
Morrish L. (CIT0028) 2019
CIT0003
CIT0026
CIT0037
CIT0029
References_xml – ident: CIT0003
  doi: 10.1057/978-1-137-55649-3
– ident: CIT0012
  doi: 10.1057/9780230000612
– ident: CIT0037
  doi: 10.4135/9781473910270
– ident: CIT0042
  doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363
– ident: CIT0010
  doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1127908
– ident: CIT0029
  doi: 10.1080/02680930500108585
– volume-title: WordSmith Tools
  year: 2014
  ident: CIT0038
– ident: CIT0030
– ident: CIT0026
  doi: 10.1080/13562510902898841
– volume-title: To Save Everything, Click Here
  year: 2014
  ident: CIT0027
– volume-title: Academic Irregularities: Language and Neoliberalism in Higher Education
  year: 2019
  ident: CIT0028
  doi: 10.4324/9781315561592
SSID ssj0007824
Score 2.2090442
Snippet In an era of neoliberal reforms, academics in UK universities have become increasingly enmeshed in audit. A new Teaching Excellent Framework (TEF) emerged in...
SourceID proquest
crossref
informaworld
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 355
SubjectTerms Academic achievement
Academic staff
Access
Accidents
Audit
Budgets
Business metrics
College students
Colleges & universities
Data
Destinations
discourse
Discourses
Education policy
Ethnicity
Government agencies
Higher education
Inequality
Innovations
Investments
Justification
Knowledge economy
Legislation
metrics
Money
Neoliberalism
Participation
Performance indicators
Polls & surveys
Quality control
Research transfer
Return on investment
Students
Surveillance
Teaching
Teaching Excellence Framework
Title The Accident of Accessibility: How the Data of the TEF Creates Neoliberal Subjects
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02691728.2019.1638991
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2264475259
Volume 33
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Bb9MwFLbGdtkFsQ1EYUM-cAAhV2niJjG3amtVoW0glIqKi2U79gnaac0O7NfzXmy3jTox4BJFSZ1Wfl-e33Pf-z5C3nIHq44qa-aEqhl3xjJl65Lp1OlUCaeSAhuFr67z6Yx_mg_nUd49dJc0um_uH-wr-R-rwjWwK3bJ_oNl1w-FC3AO9oUjWBiOf23jkTGoC9r-oT9q1Q99vWvL5NQKxsGHLlSjYjVANZ58OMdQ0aKLW7b1JUgJcqdxS2a1Ha2G3l17g1j42dmAv1reoja9T-vvt_cO2nYllmz2DqsdGY-1VLH3QGkuGApY-cXCe0iec8hefVFtdKGeyyJAhW_5w8xz8O746VDYCM_Hx2OFnehjZCi8dFeXF_v6s5zMLi9lNZ5XT8hBCgkBuOCD0fTi-7f1qguRDvf7af4nx24t5FF_6Gs6cUiHpXZnVW5DjeoZeRpyBDryBj8ie3ZxTA6_RNGJX8ek5y1Dg2de0XeBPvz9CfkKqKARFXTpaAcVHylgggIOKGICb-M5YIIGTNANJmjExHMym4yr8ykLyhnMZFnZMAdJOi-NGRoD6WriCmvzMuEud4NE2ZI7l2gLkVpplS3yuszqQqW10QOlHASoWfaC7C-WC_uSUJFwm0NO7bQYcJPlOin1kKcGhwuT8h7hcR6lCbTyqG7yQw4i-2yYfonTL8P090h_PezG86o8NkBsG0k2LXadh63MHhl7Gi0qw-u7kthBzoshpP-v_nz7NTncvDunZL-5vbNnEIk2-k0A4W8KBoED
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LTwIxEG6MHPTiAzXiswcPelhcdruPeiMoWRGIIZB4a9pue9GAkSVGf72d3S4BjeHArUkzk912Oq98M4PQFdHG6vA4dTTlqUO0VA5XaewITwuPU83dCAqFe_0wGZHOS_CyUAsDsEqIoXXRKCLX1fC4IRldQuJuTdxAYa4SILNoHTwKCgXslYAS30h5ZTjoJMlcHxsbSIpMC3WAqqzj-Y_RkoVa6l_6R1_nRqi9i2T5-QX25LU-y0Rdfv_q7Lje_-2hHeuj4mYhVPtoQ42raPu5HHrwVUW1oqoXW80wxde2ffXNARoYycNNKWFaaYYnGtaAtc1RuF93OJl8YuN14nuecdiG9fChjVvgvhpWfTXJMS_AfiYgTTQ9RKP2w7CVOHZygyNNyJs52gSJJJYykNKES66OlApjl-hQN1yuYqK1K5TxFGLFVRSmsZ9G3EulaHCujYPk-0doczwZq2OEqUtUaGI6LWiDSD8UbiwC4kkgp9IjNUTK22LStjWH6RpvrFF2P7WnyeA0mT3NGqrPyd6Lvh6rCOiiKLAsT6joYvoJ81fQnpVyw6yKmDKoYCZRYMLPkzVYX6KtZNjrsu5j_-kUbcNWDiYmZ2gz-5ipc-MyZeLCvokfS8wHVQ
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3fT9swED6hIqG-sAGb6IDNDzywh3Rp4vzw3hBQZbBVVVWkvVm243sBtRVNheCvx5c4iG5CPPAWybpT4pzv7rO-uwM45uiijsrLAIUqA47GBsqWeaAj1JESqMKMCoX_jNLiml_-TVo24dLTKglDY9MoovbVdLgXJbaMuB8ONggaq0TELNGnhEJQ_fpm6uJR0oHN6eSyKJ7dsQuBvLloEQFJtWU8rylaC1Br7Uv_c9d1DBp-AN2-fUM9uemvKt03j_80dnzX532EbZ-hstPGpHZgw852oTtuRx487EKvqell3i8s2YlvXv19DybO7tipMTSrtGJzpGdi2tYc3IefrJjfM5dzsnNVKVqm5-nFkJ1R8upUjey8ZryQ-pWmS6LlJ7geXkzPisDPbQiMA7xVgA4i8tyYxBgHlkLMrE3zkGOKg1DZnCOG2ro8IbfKZmmZx2WmotLogVLo0qM4_gyd2Xxm94GJkNvUITrUYsBNnOow1wmPDIkLE_Ee8PZnSeObmtNsjVs5aHuf-t2UtJvS72YP-s9ii6arx1sC4qUlyKq-TsFm9omM35A9bM1GegexlFS_zLPEgc8v71D9DbbG50P5-9fo6gC6tFIzifkhdKq7lT1y-VKlv_oT8QT4HwX5
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Accident+of+Accessibility%3A+How+the+Data+of+the+TEF+Creates+Neoliberal+Subjects&rft.jtitle=Social+epistemology&rft.au=Morrish%2C+Liz&rft.date=2019-07-04&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis+LLC&rft.issn=0269-1728&rft.eissn=1464-5297&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=355&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F02691728.2019.1638991&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0269-1728&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0269-1728&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0269-1728&client=summon