Ideological diversity, hostility, and discrimination in philosophy
Members of the field of philosophy have, just as other people, political convictions or, as psychologists call them, ideologies. How are different ideologies distributed and perceived in the field? Using the familiar distinction between the political left and right, we surveyed an international samp...
Saved in:
Published in | Philosophical psychology Vol. 33; no. 4; pp. 511 - 548 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Abingdon
Routledge
18.05.2020
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0951-5089 1465-394X |
DOI | 10.1080/09515089.2020.1743257 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Members of the field of philosophy have, just as other people, political convictions or, as psychologists call them, ideologies. How are different ideologies distributed and perceived in the field? Using the familiar distinction between the political left and right, we surveyed an international sample of 794 subjects in philosophy. We found that survey participants clearly leaned left (75%), while right-leaning individuals (14%) and moderates (11%) were underrepresented. Moreover, and strikingly, across the political spectrum from very left-leaning individuals and moderates to very right-leaning individuals, participants reported experiencing ideological hostility in the field, occasionally even from those on their own side of the political spectrum. Finally, while about half of the subjects believed that discrimination against left- or right-leaning individuals in the field is not justified, a significant minority displayed an explicit willingness to discriminate against colleagues with the opposite ideology. Our findings are both surprising and important because a commitment to tolerance and equality is widespread in philosophy, and there is reason to think that ideological similarity, hostility, and discrimination undermine reliable belief formation in many areas of the discipline. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Members of the field of philosophy have, just as other people, political convictions or, as psychologists call them, ideologies. How are different ideologies distributed and perceived in the field? Using the familiar distinction between the political left and right, we surveyed an international sample of 794 subjects in philosophy. We found that survey participants clearly leaned left (75%), while right-leaning individuals (14%) and moderates (11%) were underrepresented. Moreover, and strikingly, across the political spectrum from very left-leaning individuals and moderates to very right-leaning individuals, participants reported experiencing ideological hostility in the field, occasionally even from those on their own side of the political spectrum. Finally, while about half of the subjects believed that discrimination against left- or right-leaning individuals in the field is not justified, a significant minority displayed an explicit willingness to discriminate against colleagues with the opposite ideology. Our findings are both surprising and important because a commitment to tolerance and equality is widespread in philosophy, and there is reason to think that ideological similarity, hostility, and discrimination undermine reliable belief formation in many areas of the discipline. |
Author | Peters, Uwe Jussim, Lee De Block, Andreas Honeycutt, Nathan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Uwe surname: Peters fullname: Peters, Uwe email: u.peters@ucl.ac.uk organization: Department of Psychology, King's College London – sequence: 2 givenname: Nathan orcidid: 0000-0002-6529-130X surname: Honeycutt fullname: Honeycutt, Nathan organization: Department of Psychology, Rutgers University – sequence: 3 givenname: Andreas surname: De Block fullname: De Block, Andreas organization: Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science – sequence: 4 givenname: Lee surname: Jussim fullname: Jussim, Lee organization: Department of Psychology, Rutgers University |
BookMark | eNqFUE1LAzEQDVLBtvoThAWvbs3XdhO8qMWPQsGLgreQzSY2JU1qslX237vb1osHPc0w896beW8EBj54DcA5ghMEGbyCvEAFZHyCIe5GJSW4KI_AENFpkRNO3wZg2GPyHnQCRimtIISEl3wI7ua1Di68WyVdVttPHZNt2stsGVJj3a6Vvu42SUW7tl42NvjM-myztC6ksFm2p-DYSJf02aGOwevD_cvsKV88P85nt4tcEcKavOKsqLjhUClGOKc1ZApiRBSVJcbUTBGmlaKVqWsDKy0hrqqCUc2M4niKIBmDi73uJoaPrU6NWIVt9N1JgWlnCDNWoA5V7FEqhpSiNmLTPS5jKxAUfVziJy7RxyUOcXW86188ZZud2yZK6_5l3-zZ1psQ1_IrRFeLRrYuRBOlVzYJ8rfEN3DHhXE |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_03057240_2024_2349332 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4723482 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11229_023_04342_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_meta_12527 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11406_020_00263_w crossref_primary_10_1007_s13194_021_00349_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41412_022_00120_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e25043 crossref_primary_10_1007_s44202_024_00308_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11229_020_02846_2 crossref_primary_10_1177_01461672211028141 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13347_022_00512_8 crossref_primary_10_3390_philosophies7030052 |
Cites_doi | 10.1086/687863 10.1007/s11098-013-0259-7 10.1108/eb022728 10.1111/pops.12391 10.1111/meta.12358 10.5325/critphilrace.2.2.0224 10.1017/CBO9780511790751 10.2478/disp-2013-0019 10.1017/S0031819106316026 10.3390/philosophies2020012 10.1111/pops.12476 10.1007/s11229-010-9791-6 10.1073/pnas.1805868115 10.5840/philtopics201745215 10.4000/estetica.2071 10.1177/1948550616667617 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb01075.x 10.5840/monist201396319 10.1086/297748 10.1111/1475-6765.12228 10.1017/CBO9781139942478.013 10.1037/pspa0000046 10.1017/CHOL9780521563543.030 10.1007/s10539-009-9159-9 10.4159/9780674042605 10.1002/9780470173404.ch23 10.1177/0963721413510932 10.1177/1948550617750737 10.1093/analys/37.4.197 10.1093/poq/nfy005 10.4324/9781315114903-8 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199863051.001.0001 10.1016/j.intell.2015.01.008 10.1017/S0140525X14000430 10.1515/9781400865802 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198713241.003.0007 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01625.x 10.1177/1745691612454135 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01195.x 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2012.01306.x 10.1111/mila.12194 10.1111/1475-4975.00010 10.1037/pspa0000074 10.1037/arc0000055 10.1111/ajps.12152 10.1093/oso/9780198807957.001.0001 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 10.1023/A:1024232915870 10.26556/jesp.v8i2.162 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00854.x 10.1177/1745691612448792 10.1007/978-1-137-49477-1 10.2307/j.ctvnjbgwt 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01160.x |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2020 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2020 – notice: 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.1080/09515089.2020.1743257 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Psychology Philosophy |
EISSN | 1465-394X |
EndPage | 548 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1080_09515089_2020_1743257 1743257 |
Genre | Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Research Council of KU Leuven grantid: grant agreement n° 3H160214 |
GroupedDBID | -DZ -~X .7I .QK 0BK 0R~ 123 29O 4.4 53G 5VS AAGZJ AAMFJ AAMIU AAPUL AATTQ AAZMC ABCCR ABCCY ABDBF ABFIM ABIVO ABJNI ABLIJ ABPEM ABTAI ABXUL ABXYU ABZLS ACGFS ACHQT ACJZB ACTIO ACTOA ACUHS ADAHI ADCVX ADKVQ ADLRE ADMHG ADXPE AECIN AEISY AEKEX AEOZL AEPSL AEYOC AEZRU AGDLA AGMYJ AGRBW AHDZW AIJEM AJWEG AKBVH ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU AVBZW AWYRJ BEJHT BLEHA BMOTO BOHLJ CCCUG CQ1 CS3 DGFLZ DKSSO DU5 EAP EAS EBS ECR EMK EPL EPS ERP ESO ESX E~B E~C F5P FEDTE G-F GTTXZ H13 HF~ HZ~ H~9 IPNFZ J.O KYCEM LJTGL M4Z NA5 NV0 O9- P2P RIG RNANH ROSJB RSYQP S-F STATR TBQAZ TDBHL TEA TFH TFL TFW TNTFI TRJHH TUROJ UT5 UT9 VAE VQA YNT ~01 ~S~ AAGDL AAHIA AAYXX ADYSH AEFOU AFRVT AIYEW AMPGV CITATION TASJS |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-b985b9f90cc83994d08c0213c4a7224f6124bc4bfddf0bea02bb584e8fc926103 |
ISSN | 0951-5089 |
IngestDate | Sat Jul 26 03:34:52 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:34:42 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:15:54 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 25 09:08:28 EST 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c338t-b985b9f90cc83994d08c0213c4a7224f6124bc4bfddf0bea02bb584e8fc926103 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-6529-130X |
PQID | 2400028851 |
PQPubID | 33951 |
PageCount | 38 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_2400028851 crossref_primary_10_1080_09515089_2020_1743257 crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_09515089_2020_1743257 informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_09515089_2020_1743257 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-05-18 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-05-18 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2020 text: 2020-05-18 day: 18 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Abingdon |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Abingdon |
PublicationTitle | Philosophical psychology |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Routledge Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Routledge – name: Taylor & Francis Ltd |
References | CIT0072 Brownstein M. (CIT0010) 2016 CIT0030 CIT0074 CIT0032 CIT0076 CIT0031 CIT0075 CIT0034 CIT0033 CIT0077 Scruton R. (CIT0071) 2014 Rothman S. (CIT0064) 2009 Peters U. (CIT0054) CIT0036 CIT0035 CIT0079 CIT0039 Yancey G. (CIT0083) 2011 CIT0082 CIT0041 CIT0040 CIT0043 CIT0044 Popper K. (CIT0055) 1945 Longino H. (CIT0042) 2002 CIT0003 CIT0047 CIT0002 Bobbio N. (CIT0006) 1996 CIT0005 CIT0004 CIT0048 Rajczi A. (CIT0057) 2014; 28 CIT0007 CIT0009 Gampa A. (CIT0021) 2019 CIT0008 Templeton L. (CIT0078) 1997; 47 CIT0050 CIT0052 CIT0051 Klein D. (CIT0037) 2009 CIT0053 CIT0012 CIT0056 CIT0011 Sesardic N. (CIT0073) 2016 Rawls J. (CIT0058) 1971 Walzer M. (CIT0080) 1997 CIT0014 CIT0016 CIT0059 CIT0018 CIT0017 CIT0060 CIT0062 CIT0065 CIT0020 CIT0023 Rosas J. (CIT0063) 2013 CIT0067 CIT0022 Erikson R. (CIT0019) 2003 Knobe J. (CIT0038) 2017 Cohen G. A. (CIT0015) 2006 Allen-Hermanson S. (CIT0001) 2017; 8 CIT0025 CIT0024 CIT0068 CIT0027 CIT0026 CIT0029 CIT0028 Mair P. (CIT0045) 2009 |
References_xml | – ident: CIT0041 doi: 10.1086/687863 – volume-title: Compromising scholarship: Religious and political bias in American Higher Education year: 2011 ident: CIT0083 – ident: CIT0008 doi: 10.1007/s11098-013-0259-7 – ident: CIT0034 doi: 10.1108/eb022728 – ident: CIT0005 doi: 10.1111/pops.12391 – ident: CIT0036 doi: 10.1111/meta.12358 – ident: CIT0007 doi: 10.5325/critphilrace.2.2.0224 – ident: CIT0051 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511790751 – ident: CIT0065 doi: 10.2478/disp-2013-0019 – ident: CIT0056 doi: 10.1017/S0031819106316026 – ident: CIT0002 doi: 10.3390/philosophies2020012 – volume-title: How to be conservative year: 2014 ident: CIT0071 – ident: CIT0011 doi: 10.1111/pops.12476 – ident: CIT0059 doi: 10.1007/s11229-010-9791-6 – ident: CIT0030 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805868115 – ident: CIT0067 doi: 10.5840/philtopics201745215 – ident: CIT0035 doi: 10.4000/estetica.2071 – ident: CIT0028 doi: 10.1177/1948550616667617 – ident: CIT0062 doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb01075.x – volume-title: Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry year: 2002 ident: CIT0042 – ident: CIT0017 doi: 10.5840/monist201396319 – ident: CIT0079 doi: 10.1086/297748 – ident: CIT0082 doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12228 – ident: CIT0004 doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139942478.013 – start-page: 416 volume-title: Contemporary political philosophy: An anthology year: 2006 ident: CIT0015 – ident: CIT0054 publication-title: British Journal for Philosophy of Science – volume: 47 start-page: 91 issue: 415 year: 1997 ident: CIT0078 publication-title: British Journal of General Practice – volume-title: Left and right: The significance of a political distinction year: 1996 ident: CIT0006 – ident: CIT0039 doi: 10.1037/pspa0000046 – ident: CIT0043 doi: 10.1017/CHOL9780521563543.030 – ident: CIT0072 doi: 10.1007/s10539-009-9159-9 – ident: CIT0022 – volume-title: A theory of justice year: 1971 ident: CIT0058 doi: 10.4159/9780674042605 – ident: CIT0027 doi: 10.1002/9780470173404.ch23 – start-page: 15 volume-title: The politically correct university: Problems, scope, and reforms year: 2009 ident: CIT0037 – volume-title: The open society and its enemies year: 1945 ident: CIT0055 – volume-title: When reason goes on holiday: Philosophers in politics year: 2016 ident: CIT0073 – volume-title: Left and right: The great dichotomy revisited year: 2013 ident: CIT0063 – ident: CIT0009 doi: 10.1177/0963721413510932 – ident: CIT0044 doi: 10.1177/1948550617750737 – ident: CIT0048 doi: 10.1093/analys/37.4.197 – volume-title: The Oxford handbook of political behavior year: 2009 ident: CIT0045 – start-page: 1 year: 2019 ident: CIT0021 publication-title: Social Psychological and Personality Science – volume-title: Implicit bias and philosophy year: 2016 ident: CIT0010 – ident: CIT0047 doi: 10.1093/poq/nfy005 – ident: CIT0077 doi: 10.4324/9781315114903-8 – ident: CIT0074 doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199863051.001.0001 – ident: CIT0012 doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.01.008 – ident: CIT0018 doi: 10.1017/S0140525X14000430 – ident: CIT0076 doi: 10.1515/9781400865802 – ident: CIT0003 doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198713241.003.0007 – volume: 28 start-page: 341 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: CIT0057 publication-title: Public Affairs Quarterly – ident: CIT0060 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01625.x – ident: CIT0075 doi: 10.1177/1745691612454135 – volume-title: American public opinion year: 2003 ident: CIT0019 – volume-title: On Toleration year: 1997 ident: CIT0080 – volume: 8 start-page: 1 issue: 953 year: 2017 ident: CIT0001 publication-title: Frontiers in Psychology – ident: CIT0023 doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01195.x – ident: CIT0052 doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2012.01306.x – ident: CIT0053 doi: 10.1111/mila.12194 – ident: CIT0040 doi: 10.1111/1475-4975.00010 – ident: CIT0016 doi: 10.1037/pspa0000074 – ident: CIT0033 doi: 10.1037/arc0000055 – volume-title: Experimental philosophy. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy year: 2017 ident: CIT0038 – ident: CIT0031 doi: 10.1111/ajps.12152 – ident: CIT0020 doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198807957.001.0001 – ident: CIT0032 doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 – ident: CIT0068 doi: 10.1023/A:1024232915870 – start-page: 60 volume-title: The politically correct university: Problems, scope, and reforms year: 2009 ident: CIT0064 – ident: CIT0026 doi: 10.26556/jesp.v8i2.162 – ident: CIT0050 doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00854.x – ident: CIT0029 doi: 10.1177/1745691612448792 – ident: CIT0024 doi: 10.1007/978-1-137-49477-1 – ident: CIT0014 doi: 10.2307/j.ctvnjbgwt – ident: CIT0025 doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01160.x |
SSID | ssj0003979 |
Score | 2.2974794 |
Snippet | Members of the field of philosophy have, just as other people, political convictions or, as psychologists call them, ideologies. How are different ideologies... |
SourceID | proquest crossref informaworld |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 511 |
SubjectTerms | demographics diversity Hostility Ideological bias Ideology Philosophy |
Title | Ideological diversity, hostility, and discrimination in philosophy |
URI | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09515089.2020.1743257 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2400028851 |
Volume | 33 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NT9swFLe6cuEysbFpDDblwA1SObETxUdgQ-GrQlsrcbNix5Ymsa4aqVD563mOP5qoCDYuVuvKcer38_Oz_XvvIbRPWJFKTHSc4VrGNKlAD2bCMHdYAQt8nrHa-DtfjfNySs9vspvB4L7rXdKIkXx40q_kNVKFOpCr8ZL9D8mGh0IFfAb5QgkShvKfZHxWq6C7ak-wMINmXDcM6XXpyZnG-dYm8PLkxrnPYdC71732te0z5147LlcatHFJ1ab3K0j8mamlXNhrpnF7GB_sY3VwfOtUbsudrIIN7ylAC5iVv7uHD2l7b-70Zeu-tpYHpENGsoeMCaDAJgkaKatiaZ7FhFleptfBNhiGwxrtKNTMqWK7Nmc2Kuea2nc8SejNdDYyb2qYWiS1wa_7YbbLo5_8-tspvzwbX7xBGynsL9Ih2pj8OC_LsIib604bptH-Ae_8ZcKyP9VNz6zpBb1dW-Rby2Wyhd66LUd0ZPHzDg3U7D3aDJJemi9B0NvouIOqKKDqMAqYOowAUVEfUdGvWbRC1Ac0Pf0-OSljl2kjloQUTSwYTFCmGZYSDGZGa1xIMP6IpBUMDtVgBlMhqdB1rbFQFU6FAMtVFVoy2IJj8hENZ4C1TyjSTDJaUCgVpnVWVBXOVZLIVBGlWa53EPUDxaULQ2-yodzyxEerdePLzfhyN747aBSazW0clpcasK4UeNNCVVuUcvJC2z0vMu6m-x03ZGswxkGBfX7-5120uZoqe2jY_F2oL2C5NuKrQ9kjqSKTgg |
linkProvider | Taylor & Francis |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT8JAEN4oHOTi24ii9uDR4rbd1u5RjaQgEGMg4bbpbncTo0Gi5YC_3hnaJaIxHLg0bZrZ7GM6-832mxlCLgMe-4oGxg1pplzmpWAHQ4nMHR7DBh-FPMN4514_SoasMwpHP2JhkFaJPrQpEkXMbTV-3HgYbSlx1wgLAFhgnIlPkZITgOJtkmrIWQAOWHXw3EmShT3GP1e2oDxK2Tie_xpa2qGW8pf-sdfzTai1Q5TtfsE9eW1Oc9lUX78yO643vl2yXWJU57ZQqj2yocf7pPZkix7M8MHazdkBuWtn2ppQJ7M8jysH40eQeQu30BUH43-LGmKoC87L2JksWjwkw9bD4D5xy9IMrgKfNnclhxXlhlOlAGFxltFYAVoIFEtvABQYwE1MKiZNlhkqdUp9KQHq6NgoDj4bDY5IZfw-1sfEMVxxFjO4asqyME5TGmnPU74OtOGRqRNml0OoMm85ls94E55Nb1pOl8DpEuV01UlzITYpEnesEuA_11rk8xMTU5Q3EcEK2YZVDFHagE-B7FxAb6DxJ2s0fUG2kkGvK7rt_uMpqeErJC94cYNU8o-pPgNMlMvzUum_Adx-_LQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT8JAEN4oJIaLbyOK2oNHi1u6rd2jLwKohBhIvG26r8RokEg54K93hnaJaAwHLk2bZjbb3enMN-03M4SchzxpKBpaP6Ja-SxIwQ5GEpk7PAEHH0dcY77zUzduDVjnJXJswnFBq8QY2uaFIma2Gl_ukbaOEXeJqABwBaaZNCgyckLQu3VSjsEfgZKX-8-dVmtujvHHlesnj1Iujee_gRYc1EL50j_meuaDmltEutnn1JO3-iSTdfX1q7DjSo-3TTYLhOpd5yq1Q9bMcJdUeq7lwRQvnNWc7pGbtjbOgHrasTwuPMweQd4tnMJMPMz-zTuIoSZ4r0NvNB9xnwya9_3bll80ZvAVRLSZLznsJ7ecKgX4ijNNEwVYIVQsvQJIYAE1MamYtFpbKk1KG1IC0DGJVRwiNhoekNLwY2gOiWe54ixhcDSU6ShJUxqbIFANExrLY1slzO2GUEXVcmye8S4CV9y0WC6ByyWK5aqS-lxslJftWCbAf261yGbfS2ze3ESES2RrTi9EYQHGArm5gN1A349WGPqMbPTumuKx3X04JhW8g8yFIKmRUvY5MScAiDJ5Wqj8N7aZ-1g |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ideological+diversity%2C+hostility%2C+and+discrimination+in+philosophy&rft.jtitle=Philosophical+psychology&rft.au=Peters%2C+Uwe&rft.au=Honeycutt%2C+Nathan&rft.au=De+Block%2C+Andreas&rft.au=Lee%2C+Jussim&rft.date=2020-05-18&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis+Ltd&rft.issn=0951-5089&rft.eissn=1465-394X&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=511&rft.epage=548&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F09515089.2020.1743257&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0951-5089&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0951-5089&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0951-5089&client=summon |