Ideological diversity, hostility, and discrimination in philosophy

Members of the field of philosophy have, just as other people, political convictions or, as psychologists call them, ideologies. How are different ideologies distributed and perceived in the field? Using the familiar distinction between the political left and right, we surveyed an international samp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhilosophical psychology Vol. 33; no. 4; pp. 511 - 548
Main Authors Peters, Uwe, Honeycutt, Nathan, De Block, Andreas, Jussim, Lee
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 18.05.2020
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0951-5089
1465-394X
DOI10.1080/09515089.2020.1743257

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Members of the field of philosophy have, just as other people, political convictions or, as psychologists call them, ideologies. How are different ideologies distributed and perceived in the field? Using the familiar distinction between the political left and right, we surveyed an international sample of 794 subjects in philosophy. We found that survey participants clearly leaned left (75%), while right-leaning individuals (14%) and moderates (11%) were underrepresented. Moreover, and strikingly, across the political spectrum from very left-leaning individuals and moderates to very right-leaning individuals, participants reported experiencing ideological hostility in the field, occasionally even from those on their own side of the political spectrum. Finally, while about half of the subjects believed that discrimination against left- or right-leaning individuals in the field is not justified, a significant minority displayed an explicit willingness to discriminate against colleagues with the opposite ideology. Our findings are both surprising and important because a commitment to tolerance and equality is widespread in philosophy, and there is reason to think that ideological similarity, hostility, and discrimination undermine reliable belief formation in many areas of the discipline.
AbstractList Members of the field of philosophy have, just as other people, political convictions or, as psychologists call them, ideologies. How are different ideologies distributed and perceived in the field? Using the familiar distinction between the political left and right, we surveyed an international sample of 794 subjects in philosophy. We found that survey participants clearly leaned left (75%), while right-leaning individuals (14%) and moderates (11%) were underrepresented. Moreover, and strikingly, across the political spectrum from very left-leaning individuals and moderates to very right-leaning individuals, participants reported experiencing ideological hostility in the field, occasionally even from those on their own side of the political spectrum. Finally, while about half of the subjects believed that discrimination against left- or right-leaning individuals in the field is not justified, a significant minority displayed an explicit willingness to discriminate against colleagues with the opposite ideology. Our findings are both surprising and important because a commitment to tolerance and equality is widespread in philosophy, and there is reason to think that ideological similarity, hostility, and discrimination undermine reliable belief formation in many areas of the discipline.
Author Peters, Uwe
Jussim, Lee
De Block, Andreas
Honeycutt, Nathan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Uwe
  surname: Peters
  fullname: Peters, Uwe
  email: u.peters@ucl.ac.uk
  organization: Department of Psychology, King's College London
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Nathan
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6529-130X
  surname: Honeycutt
  fullname: Honeycutt, Nathan
  organization: Department of Psychology, Rutgers University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Andreas
  surname: De Block
  fullname: De Block, Andreas
  organization: Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Lee
  surname: Jussim
  fullname: Jussim, Lee
  organization: Department of Psychology, Rutgers University
BookMark eNqFUE1LAzEQDVLBtvoThAWvbs3XdhO8qMWPQsGLgreQzSY2JU1qslX237vb1osHPc0w896beW8EBj54DcA5ghMEGbyCvEAFZHyCIe5GJSW4KI_AENFpkRNO3wZg2GPyHnQCRimtIISEl3wI7ua1Di68WyVdVttPHZNt2stsGVJj3a6Vvu42SUW7tl42NvjM-myztC6ksFm2p-DYSJf02aGOwevD_cvsKV88P85nt4tcEcKavOKsqLjhUClGOKc1ZApiRBSVJcbUTBGmlaKVqWsDKy0hrqqCUc2M4niKIBmDi73uJoaPrU6NWIVt9N1JgWlnCDNWoA5V7FEqhpSiNmLTPS5jKxAUfVziJy7RxyUOcXW86188ZZud2yZK6_5l3-zZ1psQ1_IrRFeLRrYuRBOlVzYJ8rfEN3DHhXE
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_03057240_2024_2349332
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4723482
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11229_023_04342_9
crossref_primary_10_1111_meta_12527
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11406_020_00263_w
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13194_021_00349_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s41412_022_00120_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e25043
crossref_primary_10_1007_s44202_024_00308_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11229_020_02846_2
crossref_primary_10_1177_01461672211028141
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13347_022_00512_8
crossref_primary_10_3390_philosophies7030052
Cites_doi 10.1086/687863
10.1007/s11098-013-0259-7
10.1108/eb022728
10.1111/pops.12391
10.1111/meta.12358
10.5325/critphilrace.2.2.0224
10.1017/CBO9780511790751
10.2478/disp-2013-0019
10.1017/S0031819106316026
10.3390/philosophies2020012
10.1111/pops.12476
10.1007/s11229-010-9791-6
10.1073/pnas.1805868115
10.5840/philtopics201745215
10.4000/estetica.2071
10.1177/1948550616667617
10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb01075.x
10.5840/monist201396319
10.1086/297748
10.1111/1475-6765.12228
10.1017/CBO9781139942478.013
10.1037/pspa0000046
10.1017/CHOL9780521563543.030
10.1007/s10539-009-9159-9
10.4159/9780674042605
10.1002/9780470173404.ch23
10.1177/0963721413510932
10.1177/1948550617750737
10.1093/analys/37.4.197
10.1093/poq/nfy005
10.4324/9781315114903-8
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199863051.001.0001
10.1016/j.intell.2015.01.008
10.1017/S0140525X14000430
10.1515/9781400865802
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198713241.003.0007
10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01625.x
10.1177/1745691612454135
10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01195.x
10.1111/j.1527-2001.2012.01306.x
10.1111/mila.12194
10.1111/1475-4975.00010
10.1037/pspa0000074
10.1037/arc0000055
10.1111/ajps.12152
10.1093/oso/9780198807957.001.0001
10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
10.1023/A:1024232915870
10.26556/jesp.v8i2.162
10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00854.x
10.1177/1745691612448792
10.1007/978-1-137-49477-1
10.2307/j.ctvnjbgwt
10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01160.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2020
2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
Copyright_xml – notice: 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2020
– notice: 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1080/09515089.2020.1743257
DatabaseName CrossRef
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
Philosophy
EISSN 1465-394X
EndPage 548
ExternalDocumentID 10_1080_09515089_2020_1743257
1743257
Genre Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Research Council of KU Leuven
  grantid: grant agreement n° 3H160214
GroupedDBID -DZ
-~X
.7I
.QK
0BK
0R~
123
29O
4.4
53G
5VS
AAGZJ
AAMFJ
AAMIU
AAPUL
AATTQ
AAZMC
ABCCR
ABCCY
ABDBF
ABFIM
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABPEM
ABTAI
ABXUL
ABXYU
ABZLS
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACJZB
ACTIO
ACTOA
ACUHS
ADAHI
ADCVX
ADKVQ
ADLRE
ADMHG
ADXPE
AECIN
AEISY
AEKEX
AEOZL
AEPSL
AEYOC
AEZRU
AGDLA
AGMYJ
AGRBW
AHDZW
AIJEM
AJWEG
AKBVH
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
AVBZW
AWYRJ
BEJHT
BLEHA
BMOTO
BOHLJ
CCCUG
CQ1
CS3
DGFLZ
DKSSO
DU5
EAP
EAS
EBS
ECR
EMK
EPL
EPS
ERP
ESO
ESX
E~B
E~C
F5P
FEDTE
G-F
GTTXZ
H13
HF~
HZ~
H~9
IPNFZ
J.O
KYCEM
LJTGL
M4Z
NA5
NV0
O9-
P2P
RIG
RNANH
ROSJB
RSYQP
S-F
STATR
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TEA
TFH
TFL
TFW
TNTFI
TRJHH
TUROJ
UT5
UT9
VAE
VQA
YNT
~01
~S~
AAGDL
AAHIA
AAYXX
ADYSH
AEFOU
AFRVT
AIYEW
AMPGV
CITATION
TASJS
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-b985b9f90cc83994d08c0213c4a7224f6124bc4bfddf0bea02bb584e8fc926103
ISSN 0951-5089
IngestDate Sat Jul 26 03:34:52 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:34:42 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:15:54 EDT 2025
Wed Dec 25 09:08:28 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c338t-b985b9f90cc83994d08c0213c4a7224f6124bc4bfddf0bea02bb584e8fc926103
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ORCID 0000-0002-6529-130X
PQID 2400028851
PQPubID 33951
PageCount 38
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_2400028851
crossref_primary_10_1080_09515089_2020_1743257
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_09515089_2020_1743257
informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_09515089_2020_1743257
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-05-18
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-05-18
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-05-18
  day: 18
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Abingdon
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Abingdon
PublicationTitle Philosophical psychology
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Routledge
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Routledge
– name: Taylor & Francis Ltd
References CIT0072
Brownstein M. (CIT0010) 2016
CIT0030
CIT0074
CIT0032
CIT0076
CIT0031
CIT0075
CIT0034
CIT0033
CIT0077
Scruton R. (CIT0071) 2014
Rothman S. (CIT0064) 2009
Peters U. (CIT0054)
CIT0036
CIT0035
CIT0079
CIT0039
Yancey G. (CIT0083) 2011
CIT0082
CIT0041
CIT0040
CIT0043
CIT0044
Popper K. (CIT0055) 1945
Longino H. (CIT0042) 2002
CIT0003
CIT0047
CIT0002
Bobbio N. (CIT0006) 1996
CIT0005
CIT0004
CIT0048
Rajczi A. (CIT0057) 2014; 28
CIT0007
CIT0009
Gampa A. (CIT0021) 2019
CIT0008
Templeton L. (CIT0078) 1997; 47
CIT0050
CIT0052
CIT0051
Klein D. (CIT0037) 2009
CIT0053
CIT0012
CIT0056
CIT0011
Sesardic N. (CIT0073) 2016
Rawls J. (CIT0058) 1971
Walzer M. (CIT0080) 1997
CIT0014
CIT0016
CIT0059
CIT0018
CIT0017
CIT0060
CIT0062
CIT0065
CIT0020
CIT0023
Rosas J. (CIT0063) 2013
CIT0067
CIT0022
Erikson R. (CIT0019) 2003
Knobe J. (CIT0038) 2017
Cohen G. A. (CIT0015) 2006
Allen-Hermanson S. (CIT0001) 2017; 8
CIT0025
CIT0024
CIT0068
CIT0027
CIT0026
CIT0029
CIT0028
Mair P. (CIT0045) 2009
References_xml – ident: CIT0041
  doi: 10.1086/687863
– volume-title: Compromising scholarship: Religious and political bias in American Higher Education
  year: 2011
  ident: CIT0083
– ident: CIT0008
  doi: 10.1007/s11098-013-0259-7
– ident: CIT0034
  doi: 10.1108/eb022728
– ident: CIT0005
  doi: 10.1111/pops.12391
– ident: CIT0036
  doi: 10.1111/meta.12358
– ident: CIT0007
  doi: 10.5325/critphilrace.2.2.0224
– ident: CIT0051
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511790751
– ident: CIT0065
  doi: 10.2478/disp-2013-0019
– ident: CIT0056
  doi: 10.1017/S0031819106316026
– ident: CIT0002
  doi: 10.3390/philosophies2020012
– volume-title: How to be conservative
  year: 2014
  ident: CIT0071
– ident: CIT0011
  doi: 10.1111/pops.12476
– ident: CIT0059
  doi: 10.1007/s11229-010-9791-6
– ident: CIT0030
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805868115
– ident: CIT0067
  doi: 10.5840/philtopics201745215
– ident: CIT0035
  doi: 10.4000/estetica.2071
– ident: CIT0028
  doi: 10.1177/1948550616667617
– ident: CIT0062
  doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb01075.x
– volume-title: Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry
  year: 2002
  ident: CIT0042
– ident: CIT0017
  doi: 10.5840/monist201396319
– ident: CIT0079
  doi: 10.1086/297748
– ident: CIT0082
  doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12228
– ident: CIT0004
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139942478.013
– start-page: 416
  volume-title: Contemporary political philosophy: An anthology
  year: 2006
  ident: CIT0015
– ident: CIT0054
  publication-title: British Journal for Philosophy of Science
– volume: 47
  start-page: 91
  issue: 415
  year: 1997
  ident: CIT0078
  publication-title: British Journal of General Practice
– volume-title: Left and right: The significance of a political distinction
  year: 1996
  ident: CIT0006
– ident: CIT0039
  doi: 10.1037/pspa0000046
– ident: CIT0043
  doi: 10.1017/CHOL9780521563543.030
– ident: CIT0072
  doi: 10.1007/s10539-009-9159-9
– ident: CIT0022
– volume-title: A theory of justice
  year: 1971
  ident: CIT0058
  doi: 10.4159/9780674042605
– ident: CIT0027
  doi: 10.1002/9780470173404.ch23
– start-page: 15
  volume-title: The politically correct university: Problems, scope, and reforms
  year: 2009
  ident: CIT0037
– volume-title: The open society and its enemies
  year: 1945
  ident: CIT0055
– volume-title: When reason goes on holiday: Philosophers in politics
  year: 2016
  ident: CIT0073
– volume-title: Left and right: The great dichotomy revisited
  year: 2013
  ident: CIT0063
– ident: CIT0009
  doi: 10.1177/0963721413510932
– ident: CIT0044
  doi: 10.1177/1948550617750737
– ident: CIT0048
  doi: 10.1093/analys/37.4.197
– volume-title: The Oxford handbook of political behavior
  year: 2009
  ident: CIT0045
– start-page: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: CIT0021
  publication-title: Social Psychological and Personality Science
– volume-title: Implicit bias and philosophy
  year: 2016
  ident: CIT0010
– ident: CIT0047
  doi: 10.1093/poq/nfy005
– ident: CIT0077
  doi: 10.4324/9781315114903-8
– ident: CIT0074
  doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199863051.001.0001
– ident: CIT0012
  doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.01.008
– ident: CIT0018
  doi: 10.1017/S0140525X14000430
– ident: CIT0076
  doi: 10.1515/9781400865802
– ident: CIT0003
  doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198713241.003.0007
– volume: 28
  start-page: 341
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: CIT0057
  publication-title: Public Affairs Quarterly
– ident: CIT0060
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01625.x
– ident: CIT0075
  doi: 10.1177/1745691612454135
– volume-title: American public opinion
  year: 2003
  ident: CIT0019
– volume-title: On Toleration
  year: 1997
  ident: CIT0080
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1
  issue: 953
  year: 2017
  ident: CIT0001
  publication-title: Frontiers in Psychology
– ident: CIT0023
  doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01195.x
– ident: CIT0052
  doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2012.01306.x
– ident: CIT0053
  doi: 10.1111/mila.12194
– ident: CIT0040
  doi: 10.1111/1475-4975.00010
– ident: CIT0016
  doi: 10.1037/pspa0000074
– ident: CIT0033
  doi: 10.1037/arc0000055
– volume-title: Experimental philosophy. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy
  year: 2017
  ident: CIT0038
– ident: CIT0031
  doi: 10.1111/ajps.12152
– ident: CIT0020
  doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198807957.001.0001
– ident: CIT0032
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
– ident: CIT0068
  doi: 10.1023/A:1024232915870
– start-page: 60
  volume-title: The politically correct university: Problems, scope, and reforms
  year: 2009
  ident: CIT0064
– ident: CIT0026
  doi: 10.26556/jesp.v8i2.162
– ident: CIT0050
  doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00854.x
– ident: CIT0029
  doi: 10.1177/1745691612448792
– ident: CIT0024
  doi: 10.1007/978-1-137-49477-1
– ident: CIT0014
  doi: 10.2307/j.ctvnjbgwt
– ident: CIT0025
  doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01160.x
SSID ssj0003979
Score 2.2974794
Snippet Members of the field of philosophy have, just as other people, political convictions or, as psychologists call them, ideologies. How are different ideologies...
SourceID proquest
crossref
informaworld
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 511
SubjectTerms demographics
diversity
Hostility
Ideological bias
Ideology
Philosophy
Title Ideological diversity, hostility, and discrimination in philosophy
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09515089.2020.1743257
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2400028851
Volume 33
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NT9swFLe6cuEysbFpDDblwA1SObETxUdgQ-GrQlsrcbNix5Ymsa4aqVD563mOP5qoCDYuVuvKcer38_Oz_XvvIbRPWJFKTHSc4VrGNKlAD2bCMHdYAQt8nrHa-DtfjfNySs9vspvB4L7rXdKIkXx40q_kNVKFOpCr8ZL9D8mGh0IFfAb5QgkShvKfZHxWq6C7ak-wMINmXDcM6XXpyZnG-dYm8PLkxrnPYdC71732te0z5147LlcatHFJ1ab3K0j8mamlXNhrpnF7GB_sY3VwfOtUbsudrIIN7ylAC5iVv7uHD2l7b-70Zeu-tpYHpENGsoeMCaDAJgkaKatiaZ7FhFleptfBNhiGwxrtKNTMqWK7Nmc2Kuea2nc8SejNdDYyb2qYWiS1wa_7YbbLo5_8-tspvzwbX7xBGynsL9Ih2pj8OC_LsIib604bptH-Ae_8ZcKyP9VNz6zpBb1dW-Rby2Wyhd66LUd0ZPHzDg3U7D3aDJJemi9B0NvouIOqKKDqMAqYOowAUVEfUdGvWbRC1Ac0Pf0-OSljl2kjloQUTSwYTFCmGZYSDGZGa1xIMP6IpBUMDtVgBlMhqdB1rbFQFU6FAMtVFVoy2IJj8hENZ4C1TyjSTDJaUCgVpnVWVBXOVZLIVBGlWa53EPUDxaULQ2-yodzyxEerdePLzfhyN747aBSazW0clpcasK4UeNNCVVuUcvJC2z0vMu6m-x03ZGswxkGBfX7-5120uZoqe2jY_F2oL2C5NuKrQ9kjqSKTgg
linkProvider Taylor & Francis
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT8JAEN4oHOTi24ii9uDR4rbd1u5RjaQgEGMg4bbpbncTo0Gi5YC_3hnaJaIxHLg0bZrZ7GM6-832mxlCLgMe-4oGxg1pplzmpWAHQ4nMHR7DBh-FPMN4514_SoasMwpHP2JhkFaJPrQpEkXMbTV-3HgYbSlx1wgLAFhgnIlPkZITgOJtkmrIWQAOWHXw3EmShT3GP1e2oDxK2Tie_xpa2qGW8pf-sdfzTai1Q5TtfsE9eW1Oc9lUX78yO643vl2yXWJU57ZQqj2yocf7pPZkix7M8MHazdkBuWtn2ppQJ7M8jysH40eQeQu30BUH43-LGmKoC87L2JksWjwkw9bD4D5xy9IMrgKfNnclhxXlhlOlAGFxltFYAVoIFEtvABQYwE1MKiZNlhkqdUp9KQHq6NgoDj4bDY5IZfw-1sfEMVxxFjO4asqyME5TGmnPU74OtOGRqRNml0OoMm85ls94E55Nb1pOl8DpEuV01UlzITYpEnesEuA_11rk8xMTU5Q3EcEK2YZVDFHagE-B7FxAb6DxJ2s0fUG2kkGvK7rt_uMpqeErJC94cYNU8o-pPgNMlMvzUum_Adx-_LQ
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT8JAEN4oJIaLbyOK2oNHi1u6rd2jLwKohBhIvG26r8RokEg54K93hnaJaAwHLk2bZjbb3enMN-03M4SchzxpKBpaP6Ja-SxIwQ5GEpk7PAEHH0dcY77zUzduDVjnJXJswnFBq8QY2uaFIma2Gl_ukbaOEXeJqABwBaaZNCgyckLQu3VSjsEfgZKX-8-dVmtujvHHlesnj1Iujee_gRYc1EL50j_meuaDmltEutnn1JO3-iSTdfX1q7DjSo-3TTYLhOpd5yq1Q9bMcJdUeq7lwRQvnNWc7pGbtjbOgHrasTwuPMweQd4tnMJMPMz-zTuIoSZ4r0NvNB9xnwya9_3bll80ZvAVRLSZLznsJ7ecKgX4ijNNEwVYIVQsvQJIYAE1MamYtFpbKk1KG1IC0DGJVRwiNhoekNLwY2gOiWe54ixhcDSU6ShJUxqbIFANExrLY1slzO2GUEXVcmye8S4CV9y0WC6ByyWK5aqS-lxslJftWCbAf261yGbfS2ze3ESES2RrTi9EYQHGArm5gN1A349WGPqMbPTumuKx3X04JhW8g8yFIKmRUvY5MScAiDJ5Wqj8N7aZ-1g
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ideological+diversity%2C+hostility%2C+and+discrimination+in+philosophy&rft.jtitle=Philosophical+psychology&rft.au=Peters%2C+Uwe&rft.au=Honeycutt%2C+Nathan&rft.au=De+Block%2C+Andreas&rft.au=Lee%2C+Jussim&rft.date=2020-05-18&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis+Ltd&rft.issn=0951-5089&rft.eissn=1465-394X&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=511&rft.epage=548&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F09515089.2020.1743257&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0951-5089&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0951-5089&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0951-5089&client=summon