Endocuff‐assisted colonoscopy versus cap‐assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection rate: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
Background and Aims Add‐on devices have been widely used in clinical practice. The aim of this meta‐analysis was to compare the adenoma detection rate between Endocuff‐assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and cap‐assisted colonoscopy (CAC). Methods PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases were searched....
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology Vol. 35; no. 12; pp. 2066 - 2073 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Australia
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.12.2020
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Background and Aims
Add‐on devices have been widely used in clinical practice. The aim of this meta‐analysis was to compare the adenoma detection rate between Endocuff‐assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and cap‐assisted colonoscopy (CAC).
Methods
PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases were searched. Outcomes included adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, and withdrawal time. Dichotomous data were pooled to obtain the odds ratio or risk ratio. Continuous data were pooled using the mean difference.
Results
Of the 240 articles reviewed, six randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 1994 patients. In the meta‐analysis, no statistical difference in adenoma detection rate was detected between EAC and CAC (47.0% vs 45.1%; P = 0.33). EAC significantly improved detection rate of diminutive adenomas/polyps compared with CAC (P = 0.01). Cecal intubation was achieved in 96.5% in EAC group and 97.9% in CAC group (P = 0.04). Besides, no statistical difference was found in cecal intubation time (P = 0.86), withdrawal time (P = 0.88), small adenomas/polyps (P = 0.60), or large adenomas/polyps (P = 0.95).
Conclusion
EAC and CAC have their respective merits. EAC significantly improve the detection of diminutive adenomas/polyps. CAC was better in cecal intubation rate. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Background and Aims
Add‐on devices have been widely used in clinical practice. The aim of this meta‐analysis was to compare the adenoma detection rate between Endocuff‐assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and cap‐assisted colonoscopy (CAC).
Methods
PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases were searched. Outcomes included adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, and withdrawal time. Dichotomous data were pooled to obtain the odds ratio or risk ratio. Continuous data were pooled using the mean difference.
Results
Of the 240 articles reviewed, six randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 1994 patients. In the meta‐analysis, no statistical difference in adenoma detection rate was detected between EAC and CAC (47.0% vs 45.1%; P = 0.33). EAC significantly improved detection rate of diminutive adenomas/polyps compared with CAC (P = 0.01). Cecal intubation was achieved in 96.5% in EAC group and 97.9% in CAC group (P = 0.04). Besides, no statistical difference was found in cecal intubation time (P = 0.86), withdrawal time (P = 0.88), small adenomas/polyps (P = 0.60), or large adenomas/polyps (P = 0.95).
Conclusion
EAC and CAC have their respective merits. EAC significantly improve the detection of diminutive adenomas/polyps. CAC was better in cecal intubation rate. Add-on devices have been widely used in clinical practice. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the adenoma detection rate between Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC). PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases were searched. Outcomes included adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, and withdrawal time. Dichotomous data were pooled to obtain the odds ratio or risk ratio. Continuous data were pooled using the mean difference. Of the 240 articles reviewed, six randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 1994 patients. In the meta-analysis, no statistical difference in adenoma detection rate was detected between EAC and CAC (47.0% vs 45.1%; P = 0.33). EAC significantly improved detection rate of diminutive adenomas/polyps compared with CAC (P = 0.01). Cecal intubation was achieved in 96.5% in EAC group and 97.9% in CAC group (P = 0.04). Besides, no statistical difference was found in cecal intubation time (P = 0.86), withdrawal time (P = 0.88), small adenomas/polyps (P = 0.60), or large adenomas/polyps (P = 0.95). EAC and CAC have their respective merits. EAC significantly improve the detection of diminutive adenomas/polyps. CAC was better in cecal intubation rate. Add-on devices have been widely used in clinical practice. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the adenoma detection rate between Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC).BACKGROUND AND AIMSAdd-on devices have been widely used in clinical practice. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the adenoma detection rate between Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC).PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases were searched. Outcomes included adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, and withdrawal time. Dichotomous data were pooled to obtain the odds ratio or risk ratio. Continuous data were pooled using the mean difference.METHODSPubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases were searched. Outcomes included adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, and withdrawal time. Dichotomous data were pooled to obtain the odds ratio or risk ratio. Continuous data were pooled using the mean difference.Of the 240 articles reviewed, six randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 1994 patients. In the meta-analysis, no statistical difference in adenoma detection rate was detected between EAC and CAC (47.0% vs 45.1%; P = 0.33). EAC significantly improved detection rate of diminutive adenomas/polyps compared with CAC (P = 0.01). Cecal intubation was achieved in 96.5% in EAC group and 97.9% in CAC group (P = 0.04). Besides, no statistical difference was found in cecal intubation time (P = 0.86), withdrawal time (P = 0.88), small adenomas/polyps (P = 0.60), or large adenomas/polyps (P = 0.95).RESULTSOf the 240 articles reviewed, six randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 1994 patients. In the meta-analysis, no statistical difference in adenoma detection rate was detected between EAC and CAC (47.0% vs 45.1%; P = 0.33). EAC significantly improved detection rate of diminutive adenomas/polyps compared with CAC (P = 0.01). Cecal intubation was achieved in 96.5% in EAC group and 97.9% in CAC group (P = 0.04). Besides, no statistical difference was found in cecal intubation time (P = 0.86), withdrawal time (P = 0.88), small adenomas/polyps (P = 0.60), or large adenomas/polyps (P = 0.95).EAC and CAC have their respective merits. EAC significantly improve the detection of diminutive adenomas/polyps. CAC was better in cecal intubation rate.CONCLUSIONEAC and CAC have their respective merits. EAC significantly improve the detection of diminutive adenomas/polyps. CAC was better in cecal intubation rate. Background and AimsAdd‐on devices have been widely used in clinical practice. The aim of this meta‐analysis was to compare the adenoma detection rate between Endocuff‐assisted colonoscopy (EAC) and cap‐assisted colonoscopy (CAC).MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases were searched. Outcomes included adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, cecal intubation time, and withdrawal time. Dichotomous data were pooled to obtain the odds ratio or risk ratio. Continuous data were pooled using the mean difference.ResultsOf the 240 articles reviewed, six randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 1994 patients. In the meta‐analysis, no statistical difference in adenoma detection rate was detected between EAC and CAC (47.0% vs 45.1%; P = 0.33). EAC significantly improved detection rate of diminutive adenomas/polyps compared with CAC (P = 0.01). Cecal intubation was achieved in 96.5% in EAC group and 97.9% in CAC group (P = 0.04). Besides, no statistical difference was found in cecal intubation time (P = 0.86), withdrawal time (P = 0.88), small adenomas/polyps (P = 0.60), or large adenomas/polyps (P = 0.95).ConclusionEAC and CAC have their respective merits. EAC significantly improve the detection of diminutive adenomas/polyps. CAC was better in cecal intubation rate. |
| Author | Wang, Peng Li, Ai Li, Yan‐Qing Zhou, Ru‐Chen Yang, Jing‐Ze Feng, Bing‐Cheng Yang, Xiao‐Xiao Qu, Jun‐Yan Li, Li‐Xiang Zhang, Ming‐Ming Zuo, Xiu‐Li |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ai surname: Li fullname: Li, Ai organization: Shandong University – sequence: 2 givenname: Jing‐Ze surname: Yang fullname: Yang, Jing‐Ze organization: Shandong University – sequence: 3 givenname: Xiao‐Xiao surname: Yang fullname: Yang, Xiao‐Xiao organization: Shandong University – sequence: 4 givenname: Bing‐Cheng surname: Feng fullname: Feng, Bing‐Cheng organization: Shandong University – sequence: 5 givenname: Ming‐Ming surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Ming‐Ming organization: Shandong University – sequence: 6 givenname: Jun‐Yan surname: Qu fullname: Qu, Jun‐Yan organization: Shandong University – sequence: 7 givenname: Ru‐Chen surname: Zhou fullname: Zhou, Ru‐Chen organization: Shandong University – sequence: 8 givenname: Peng surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Peng organization: Shandong University – sequence: 9 givenname: Li‐Xiang surname: Li fullname: Li, Li‐Xiang organization: Shandong University – sequence: 10 givenname: Xiu‐Li orcidid: 0000-0001-9556-8771 surname: Zuo fullname: Zuo, Xiu‐Li organization: Shandong University – sequence: 11 givenname: Yan‐Qing orcidid: 0000-0001-9325-4808 surname: Li fullname: Li, Yan‐Qing email: liyanqing@sdu.edu.cn organization: Shandong University |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32562282$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kcFuFSEUhompsbfVhS9gJnGji2lhgIFx1zS11TRxo-sJAwflhoErMDXXlW-gz-iTyO2tLprUszkn4fv_E85_hA5CDIDQc4JPSK3T9ecvJ4QTzh-hFWEMt0Sw_gCtsCS8HSgZDtFRzmuMMcOCP0GHtON918luhX5eBBP1Yu3vH79Uzi4XMI2OPoaYddxsmxtIecmNVpuHCBtTowyEOKvGQAFdXAxNUgXeNGfNDEXtlEH5bRU30danunN23299QknR-zqW5JTPT9FjWxs8u-vH6NPbi4_nV-31h8t352fXraZU8taQyTBl-h4kFT2dKMdYgCXcWCmlmAaGe9pNkoAigxXSEKEnBnoYDJO6M_QYvdr7blL8ukAu4-yyBu9VgLjksWOEdwMTXFT05T10HZdU_7OjesEpZ5JV6sUdtUwzmHGT3KzSdvx76gq83gM6xZwT2H8IweMuxrHGON7GWNnTe6x2Re3uWpJy_n-Kb87D9mHr8f3l1V7xB8eMs0g |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tige_2021_06_007 crossref_primary_10_1080_17474124_2023_2273990 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2021_12_037 crossref_primary_10_1002_ueg2_12078 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_15321 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2022_08_030 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x 10.1055/a-0996-7891 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01402.x 10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.067 10.3322/caac.21492 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.046 10.1055/s-0034-1365446 10.3748/wjg.v16.i31.3905 10.1016/j.amjms.2017.01.015 10.1056/NEJMoa0907667 10.7326/M14-2385 10.3748/wjg.v24.i37.4243 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1158 10.5946/ce.2019.124 10.1055/s-0043-117879 10.3748/wjg.v23.i21.3784 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000510 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181c37f9c 10.1055/a-0925-4956 10.1055/s-0033-1335637 10.1055/a-0901-7306 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314889 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.011 10.1136/bmj.d5928 10.1038/ajg.2008.56 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300187 10.1111/jgh.14771 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.064 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2020 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd – notice: 2020 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7T5 7U9 H94 K9. 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1111/jgh.15155 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed Immunology Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Immunology Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Statistics |
| EISSN | 1440-1746 |
| EndPage | 2073 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 32562282 10_1111_jgh_15155 JGH15155 |
| Genre | article Journal Article |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province funderid: 2018CXGC1209 – fundername: Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province funderid: 20181219 – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China funderid: 81873550 – fundername: Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province funderid: ZR2016HB62 – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China grantid: 81873550 – fundername: Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province grantid: ZR2016HB62 – fundername: Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province grantid: 20181219 – fundername: Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province grantid: 2018CXGC1209 |
| GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29K 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFWVQ AFZJQ AHBTC AHEFC AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F D-I DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DTERQ DU5 EBS EJD EMOBN ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO KMS LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TEORI UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOQ WOW WQJ WRC WUP WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 YFH ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAYXX AEYWJ AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG CITATION NPM 7T5 7U9 AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY H94 K9. 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3385-d1bd4ad66e83763b35007ef15df8887b940632b81ea19f78d17cb4ec99d48c2d3 |
| IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
| ISSN | 0815-9319 1440-1746 |
| IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 11:17:29 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 08:41:48 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:28:58 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:56 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:45:22 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:31:23 EST 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 12 |
| Keywords | Endocuff adenoma detection rate colorectal cancer cap-assisted colonoscopy |
| Language | English |
| License | 2020 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3385-d1bd4ad66e83763b35007ef15df8887b940632b81ea19f78d17cb4ec99d48c2d3 |
| Notes | We declare that we have no conflict of interests. Ai Li and Jing‐Ze Yang were responsible for analyzing the data and drafting the manuscript. Xiao‐Xiao Yang, Ru‐Chen Zhou and Bing‐Cheng Feng were involved in data collection. Ming‐Ming Zhang, Jun‐Yan Qu, Peng Wang and Li‐Xiang Li interpreted the data. Xiu‐Li Zuo and Yan‐Qing Li provided critical revision of the manuscript. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript. Declaration of conflict of interest This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81873550), Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (2018CXGC1209), and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2016HB62) This study is also supported by the Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province (20181219). Financial support Author contributions ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-9556-8771 0000-0001-9325-4808 |
| PMID | 32562282 |
| PQID | 2467535484 |
| PQPubID | 2045136 |
| PageCount | 8 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2415294757 proquest_journals_2467535484 pubmed_primary_32562282 crossref_primary_10_1111_jgh_15155 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_jgh_15155 wiley_primary_10_1111_jgh_15155_JGH15155 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | December 2020 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-12-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2020 text: December 2020 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Australia |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Australia – name: Richmond |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Gastroenterol Hepatol |
| PublicationYear | 2020 |
| Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
| References | 2012; 61 2015; 162 2019; 7 2010; 53 2010; 16 2013; 25 2019; 51 2019; 10 2017; 49 2019; 34 2017; 23 2010; 362 2014; 46 2017; 353 2018; 87 2018; 68 2018; 24 2016; 4 2017; 30 2020 2019; 68 2013; 51 2020; 91 2019; 25 2020; 115 2016; 84 2006; 101 2011; 343 2009; 104 e_1_2_6_32_1 e_1_2_6_31_1 e_1_2_6_30_1 e_1_2_6_19_1 e_1_2_6_13_1 e_1_2_6_14_1 e_1_2_6_11_1 e_1_2_6_12_1 Bensuleiman Y (e_1_2_6_8_1) 2016; 4 e_1_2_6_17_1 e_1_2_6_15_1 e_1_2_6_16_1 Cumpston M (e_1_2_6_18_1) 2019; 10 e_1_2_6_21_1 e_1_2_6_20_1 e_1_2_6_9_1 e_1_2_6_5_1 e_1_2_6_4_1 e_1_2_6_7_1 e_1_2_6_6_1 Mir FA (e_1_2_6_10_1) 2017; 30 e_1_2_6_25_1 e_1_2_6_24_1 e_1_2_6_3_1 e_1_2_6_23_1 e_1_2_6_2_1 e_1_2_6_22_1 e_1_2_6_29_1 e_1_2_6_28_1 e_1_2_6_27_1 e_1_2_6_26_1 |
| References_xml | – volume: 162 start-page: 777 year: 2015 end-page: 784 article-title: The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta‐analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations publication-title: Ann. Intern. Med. – volume: 61 start-page: 402 year: 2012 end-page: 408 article-title: Higher adenoma detection rates with cap‐assisted colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial publication-title: Gut – volume: 101 start-page: 343 year: 2006 end-page: 350 article-title: Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review publication-title: Am. J. Gastroenterol. – volume: 68 start-page: 394 year: 2018 end-page: 424 article-title: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries publication-title: CA Cancer J. Clin. – volume: 7 start-page: E1585 year: 2019 end-page: E1591 article-title: Comparison of colon adenoma detection rates using cap‐assisted and Endocuff‐assisted colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Endosc. Int. Open. – year: 2020 article-title: Endocuff‐assisted versus cap‐assisted colonoscopy performed by trainees: a retrospective study publication-title: Clin Endosc. – volume: 87 start-page: 723 year: 2018 end-page: 732 article-title: Impact of cap‐assisted colonoscopy on the learning curve and quality in colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Gastrointest. Endosc. – volume: 25 start-page: 434 year: 2013 end-page: 439 article-title: Cap‐assisted water immersion for minimal sedation colonoscopy: prospective, randomized, single‐center trial publication-title: Dig. Endosc. – volume: 30 start-page: 640 year: 2017 end-page: 648 article-title: Cap‐assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy: is the cap beneficial? A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials publication-title: Ann. Gastroenterol. – volume: 53 start-page: 339 year: 2010 end-page: 345 article-title: Yield of high‐grade dysplasia based on polyp size detected at colonoscopy: a series of 2295 examinations following a positive fecal occult blood test in a population‐based study publication-title: Dis. Colon Rectum – volume: 34 start-page: 1492 year: 2019 end-page: 1496 article-title: Randomized control trial of adenoma detection rate in Endocuff‐assisted colonoscopy versus transparent hood‐assisted colonoscopy publication-title: J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. – volume: 353 start-page: 367 year: 2017 end-page: 373 article-title: Cap‐assisted colonoscopy increases detection of advanced adenomas and polyps publication-title: Am. J. Med. Sci. – volume: 68 start-page: 280 year: 2019 end-page: 288 article-title: Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial publication-title: Gut – volume: 16 start-page: 3905 year: 2010 end-page: 3910 article-title: Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap‐assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy publication-title: World J. Gastroenterol. – volume: 24 start-page: 4243 year: 2018 end-page: 4253 article-title: Colonoscopy attachments for the detection of precancerous lesions during colonoscopy: a review of the literature publication-title: World J. Gastroenterol. – volume: 91 start-page: 894 year: 2020 end-page: 904 article-title: Endoscopic cuff‐assisted colonoscopy versus cap‐assisted colonoscopy in adenoma detection: randomized tandem study‐DEtection in Tandem Endocuff Cap Trial (DETECT) publication-title: Gastrointest. Endosc. – volume: 115 start-page: 465 year: 2020 end-page: 472 article-title: Cap‐assisted chromoendoscopy using a mounted cap versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection publication-title: Am. J. Gastroenterol. – volume: 362 start-page: 1795 year: 2010 end-page: 1803 article-title: Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer publication-title: N. Engl. J. Med. – volume: 49 start-page: 1061 year: 2017 end-page: 1068 article-title: Higher adenoma detection rate with the Endocuff: a randomized trial publication-title: Endoscopy – volume: 25 start-page: 1158 year: 2019 end-page: 1170 article-title: Effect of Endocuff use on colonoscopy outcomes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis publication-title: World J. Gastroenterol. – volume: 51 start-page: 742 year: 2019 end-page: 749 article-title: Cuff‐assisted versus cap‐assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: results of a randomized study publication-title: Endoscopy – volume: 343 start-page: d5928 year: 2011 article-title: The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials publication-title: BMJ – volume: 104 start-page: 41 year: 2009 end-page: 46 article-title: Efficacy of cap‐assisted colonoscopy in comparison with regular colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Am. J. Gastroenterol. – volume: 46 start-page: 610 year: 2014 end-page: 614 article-title: Endocuff‐assisted colonoscopy: a new accessory to improve adenoma detection rate? Technical aspects and first clinical experiences publication-title: Endoscopy – volume: 51 start-page: 1383 year: 2013 end-page: 1388 article-title: Prospective and randomized study to evaluate the clinical impact of cap assisted colonoscopy (CAC) publication-title: Z. Gastroenterol. – volume: 23 start-page: 3784 year: 2017 end-page: 3796 article-title: New endoscopes and add‐on devices to improve colonoscopy performance publication-title: World J. Gastroenterol. – volume: 10 year: 2019 article-title: Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. – volume: 4 start-page: A661 year: 2016 article-title: Adenoma detection with Endocuff‐assisted colonoscopy publication-title: United European Gastroenterol. J. – volume: 87 year: 2018 article-title: Standard vs. endocuff vs. cap assisted colonoscopy for polyp detection: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Gastrointest. Endosc. – volume: 84 start-page: 315 year: 2016 end-page: 325 article-title: Outcome of EMR as an alternative to surgery in patients with complex colon polyps publication-title: Gastrointest. Endosc. – volume: 51 start-page: 637 year: 2019 end-page: 645 article-title: Endocuff‐assisted colonoscopy for surveillance of serrated polyposis syndrome: a multicenter randomized controlled trial publication-title: Endoscopy – ident: e_1_2_6_3_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x – ident: e_1_2_6_15_1 doi: 10.1055/a-0996-7891 – ident: e_1_2_6_32_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01402.x – ident: e_1_2_6_6_1 doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.01.067 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_1 doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 – ident: e_1_2_6_16_1 doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.046 – ident: e_1_2_6_29_1 doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365446 – ident: e_1_2_6_26_1 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i31.3905 – ident: e_1_2_6_24_1 doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2017.01.015 – ident: e_1_2_6_4_1 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907667 – ident: e_1_2_6_17_1 doi: 10.7326/M14-2385 – ident: e_1_2_6_7_1 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i37.4243 – ident: e_1_2_6_22_1 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1158 – ident: e_1_2_6_30_1 doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.124 – volume: 10 start-page: ED000142 year: 2019 ident: e_1_2_6_18_1 article-title: Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. – ident: e_1_2_6_28_1 doi: 10.1055/s-0043-117879 – ident: e_1_2_6_5_1 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i21.3784 – ident: e_1_2_6_21_1 doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000510 – ident: e_1_2_6_31_1 doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181c37f9c – volume: 4 start-page: A661 year: 2016 ident: e_1_2_6_8_1 article-title: Adenoma detection with Endocuff‐assisted colonoscopy publication-title: United European Gastroenterol. J. – ident: e_1_2_6_11_1 doi: 10.1055/a-0925-4956 – ident: e_1_2_6_25_1 doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1335637 – ident: e_1_2_6_14_1 doi: 10.1055/a-0901-7306 – ident: e_1_2_6_9_1 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314889 – ident: e_1_2_6_23_1 doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.011 – ident: e_1_2_6_19_1 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928 – ident: e_1_2_6_27_1 doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.56 – volume: 30 start-page: 640 year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_6_10_1 article-title: Cap‐assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy: is the cap beneficial? A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials publication-title: Ann. Gastroenterol. – ident: e_1_2_6_12_1 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300187 – ident: e_1_2_6_13_1 doi: 10.1111/jgh.14771 – ident: e_1_2_6_20_1 doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.064 |
| SSID | ssj0004075 |
| Score | 2.3477347 |
| Snippet | Background and Aims
Add‐on devices have been widely used in clinical practice. The aim of this meta‐analysis was to compare the adenoma detection rate between... Add-on devices have been widely used in clinical practice. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the adenoma detection rate between Endocuff-assisted... Background and AimsAdd‐on devices have been widely used in clinical practice. The aim of this meta‐analysis was to compare the adenoma detection rate between... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 2066 |
| SubjectTerms | Adenoma adenoma detection rate cap‐assisted colonoscopy Cecum Clinical trials Colon Colonoscopy colorectal cancer Endocuff Intubation Meta-analysis Polyps Statistics Tumors |
| Title | Endocuff‐assisted colonoscopy versus cap‐assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection rate: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials |
| URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fjgh.15155 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32562282 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2467535484 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2415294757 |
| Volume | 35 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LbtUwELWqLqpugEKBCwUZ1EU3uSKxHcewqlDLVaWyQFTqAinys63oTSpusqAr_gC-sV_SGecBfUmoO0sex04y4zljj48J2ZRBeanA0qTHK8yYyxJlIVgRnhUuC8yzSFa9_zmfHfC9Q3G4RD4MZ2E6fohxwQ0tI87XaODaLP418qPjKXpjPGCOuVoIiL78pY7iHckueDyRKNCznlUoZvEMLa_6ohsA8ypejQ5n9yH5Ngy1yzP5Pm0bM7Xn11gc7_kuj8iDHojS7U5z1siSrx6Tlf1-q_0J-b1Tudq2IVz8-gMAG7XBUaS4rmo8yfKTYj5Hu6BWn90lAXiYapjX6rmmzjcx6auiyE3xnm7TuW80tuxZUWgdoAr6nJ-cx-fEFPpTKMaLRRbr5GB35-vHWdLf3pBYCHtF4lLjuHZ57gucxAwTAEd8SIULEHVLowBKsMwUqdepCrJwqbSGe6uU44XNHHtKlqu68s8J9bn2hRa5MZ5z67RhJvB3RhoWchVyPSFbw38sbU9tjjdsnJZjiHN0XMYPPCFvR9Gzjs_jNqGNQRnK3qQXZQYuRTAI8PiEvBmrwRhxh0VXvm5RBuCQ4lLICXnWKdHYCwNwmUGAC4ONqnB39-Xep1ksvPh_0ZdkNcOVgJhos0GWmx-tfwVwqTGvo11cAoPBFmk |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VIgEX3o-FAgZx4JJVE9txjLhUqGUp3R5QK_WCIj9bRDep2ORAT_wD-I38EsbOAwpUQtwseRI7yYznG2f8DcAz4aUTEi1NuFDCjNoskQaDFe5oYTNPHY1k1fPdfLbPtg_4wQq8HM7CdPwQ44ZbsIy4XgcDDxvSv1r54dE0uGN-AS6Git4xoHr3kzyKdTS76PN4IlHTel6hmMczXHrWG_0BMc8i1uhytq7B-2GyXabJx2nb6Kk5_Y3H8X-f5jpc7bEo2eiU5wasuOomXJr3f9tvwdfNytam9f77l2-IsYNCWBJYrqs6HGb5TEJKR7skRp2cJ4GQmChc2uqFItY1Me-rIoGe4gXZIAvXqHBlT4xCao9dOObiw2m8T8yiP8ZmrC2yvA37W5t7r2ZJX8AhMRj58sSm2jJl89wVYR3TlCMicT7l1mPgLbRENEEzXaROpdKLwqbCaOaMlJYVJrP0DqxWdeXuAXG5coXiudaOMWOVptqzdS009bn0uZrA8-FDlqZnNw9FNo7LMco5PCrjC57A01H0pKP0-JvQ2qANZW_VyzJDr8IpxnhsAk_GbrTH8JNFVa5ugwwiIskEFxO422nROApFfJlhjIuTjbpw_vDl9utZbNz_d9HHcHm2N98pd97svn0AV7KwMRDzbtZgtfnUuoeInhr9KBrJD79HGoQ |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VIlVcoLzKQgGDOHDJqontJKaninZZCq0QolIPSJGfLaKbrNjkQE_8A_ob-0sYOw8oUAlxs-Rx7CQznm_s8WeAZ5kTNhNoaZn1V5hRk0RCY7DCLc1N4qilgax6bz-dHrDdQ364BJv9WZiWH2JYcPOWEeZrb-Bz43418qPjsffG_ApcZelG7lV6-_1P7ijWsuyiy-ORQEXraIVCGk_f9KIz-gNhXgSsweNMbsDHfqxtosnncVOrsT79jcbxP19mFa53SJRstapzE5ZseQtW9rq99tvwfac0lW6cO_92hgjbq4MhnuO6rPxRlq_EJ3Q0C6Ll_DIJBMRE4sRWzSQxtg5ZXyXx5BQvyBaZ2Vr6lh0tCqkcVmGfs0-n4Tkhh_4Ei-FmkcUdOJjsfHg5jbrrGyKNcS-PTKwMkyZNbe5nMUU54hHrYm4cht2ZEoglaKLy2MpYuCw3caYVs1oIw3KdGHoXlsuqtPeA2FTaXPJUKcuYNlJR5diGyhR1qXCpHMHz_j8WuuM291dsnBRDjHN0XIQPPIKng-i8JfT4m9B6rwxFZ9OLIkGfwilGeGwET4ZqtEa_xSJLWzVeBvGQYBnPRrDWKtHQC0V0mWCEi4MNqnB598Xuq2ko3P930cew8m57Urx9vf_mAVxL_KpASLpZh-X6S2MfInSq1aNgIj8AjMwZPA |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endocuff%E2%80%90assisted+colonoscopy+versus+cap%E2%80%90assisted+colonoscopy+for+adenoma+detection+rate%3A+A+meta%E2%80%90analysis+of+randomized+controlled+trials&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+gastroenterology+and+hepatology&rft.au=Li%2C+Ai&rft.au=Yang%2C+Jing%E2%80%90Ze&rft.au=Yang%2C+Xiao%E2%80%90Xiao&rft.au=Feng%2C+Bing%E2%80%90Cheng&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2066&rft.epage=2073&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fjgh.15155&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_jgh_15155 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0815-9319&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0815-9319&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0815-9319&client=summon |