LED lights and plant growth regulators enhance the in vitro mass propagation of rosemary ( Rosmarinus officinalis L.)
Rosemary ( Rosmarinus officinalis L.) is a valuable medicinal and aromatic herb produced for its bioactive compounds and commercial applications. However, commonly used methods for rosemary propagation have various limitations that impose the need to create appropriate protocols for in vitro propaga...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of horticultural science Vol. 90; no. 1 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
CABI
11.04.2025
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Rosemary ( Rosmarinus officinalis L.) is a valuable medicinal and aromatic herb produced for its bioactive compounds and commercial applications. However, commonly used methods for rosemary propagation have various limitations that impose the need to create appropriate protocols for in vitro propagation of this species. This research aimed to evaluate the effects of light quality and plant growth regulators (PGRs) on rosemary micropropagation. Explants were cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with varying concentrations of 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BAP), meta-Topolin (mT), 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), and indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), under different light treatments: fluorescent light (FL) and blue (BL), red (RL), and red-blue (RBL) LED lights. The highest fresh mass was formed by explants grown in medium with mT at 1.0 mg/L + 0.1 mg/L NAA under BL (88.05 ± 2.94 mg), while FL with the same PGR combination resulted in the highest dry mass (12.89 ± 0.55 mg). FL, in combination with 1.0 mg/L mT + 0.1 mg/L NAA, produced the highest number of new shoots (2.07 ± 0.04), and RL, in combination with cytokinin-free MS medium, induced the longest shoots (13.16 ± 0.37 mm). The highest number of nodes (3.91 ± 0.08) was recorded under BL in the cytokinin-free medium. For in vitro rooting, BL combined with 0.1 mg/L mT + 0.5 mg/L IBA produced the highest rooting percentage (80.00 ± 5.77%), the highest number of roots (3.92 ± 0.15), and the longest roots (75.30 ± 1.76 mm). This treatment also resulted in the highest plantlet establishment rate (71.13 ± 4.43%), confirming the synergy between BL and mT + IBA in improving the efficiency of rosemary rooting and acclimatization. These results enable a more straightforward selection of the optimal light spectrum and PGR concentrations for individual stages of the rosemary micropropagation process and highlight the potential of LED lights as a more efficient alternative to traditional fluorescent lamps. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Abstract Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) is a valuable medicinal and aromatic herb produced for its bioactive compounds and commercial applications. However, commonly used methods for rosemary propagation have various limitations that impose the need to create appropriate protocols for in vitro propagation of this species. This research aimed to evaluate the effects of light quality and plant growth regulators (PGRs) on rosemary micropropagation. Explants were cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with varying concentrations of 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BAP), meta-Topolin (mT), 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), and indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), under different light treatments: fluorescent light (FL) and blue (BL), red (RL), and red-blue (RBL) LED lights. The highest fresh mass was formed by explants grown in medium with mT at 1.0 mg/L + 0.1 mg/L NAA under BL (88.05 ± 2.94 mg), while FL with the same PGR combination resulted in the highest dry mass (12.89 ± 0.55 mg). FL, in combination with 1.0 mg/L mT + 0.1 mg/L NAA, produced the highest number of new shoots (2.07 ± 0.04), and RL, in combination with cytokinin-free MS medium, induced the longest shoots (13.16 ± 0.37 mm). The highest number of nodes (3.91 ± 0.08) was recorded under BL in the cytokinin-free medium. For in vitro rooting, BL combined with 0.1 mg/L mT + 0.5 mg/L IBA produced the highest rooting percentage (80.00 ± 5.77%), the highest number of roots (3.92 ± 0.15), and the longest roots (75.30 ± 1.76 mm). This treatment also resulted in the highest plantlet establishment rate (71.13 ± 4.43%), confirming the synergy between BL and mT + IBA in improving the efficiency of rosemary rooting and acclimatization. These results enable a more straightforward selection of the optimal light spectrum and PGR concentrations for individual stages of the rosemary micropropagation process and highlight the potential of LED lights as a more efficient alternative to traditional fluorescent lamps. Significance of the study What is already known about this subject? Previous research on various plant species has shown that light quality and PGRs are important factors in regulating and directing multiplication, rooting, and general development of in vitro plants. LED lights, especially those in the blue and red spectra, showed positive effects on the processes of photomorphogenesis and, in general, the growth and development of explants. However, research on the micropropagation of rosemary has usually been focused on callus formation and active compound production and rarely on developing effective protocols for producing high-quality planting material. What are the new findings? This research showed the potential of LED lighting to outperform standard fluorescent light during in vitro rosemary propagation. Also, mT was found to be more effective than 6-BAP in promoting shoot proliferation and multiplication. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to simultaneously investigate the synergistic effects of light quality and PGRs on rosemary micropropagation. What are the expected impacts on horticulture? The findings of this research provide an efficient and integrated approach to the in vitro propagation of rosemary. Energy-efficient LED lights and optimal PGR combinations allow commercial growers to produce high-quality planting material. Rosemary ( Rosmarinus officinalis L.) is a valuable medicinal and aromatic herb produced for its bioactive compounds and commercial applications. However, commonly used methods for rosemary propagation have various limitations that impose the need to create appropriate protocols for in vitro propagation of this species. This research aimed to evaluate the effects of light quality and plant growth regulators (PGRs) on rosemary micropropagation. Explants were cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with varying concentrations of 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BAP), meta-Topolin (mT), 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), and indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), under different light treatments: fluorescent light (FL) and blue (BL), red (RL), and red-blue (RBL) LED lights. The highest fresh mass was formed by explants grown in medium with mT at 1.0 mg/L + 0.1 mg/L NAA under BL (88.05 ± 2.94 mg), while FL with the same PGR combination resulted in the highest dry mass (12.89 ± 0.55 mg). FL, in combination with 1.0 mg/L mT + 0.1 mg/L NAA, produced the highest number of new shoots (2.07 ± 0.04), and RL, in combination with cytokinin-free MS medium, induced the longest shoots (13.16 ± 0.37 mm). The highest number of nodes (3.91 ± 0.08) was recorded under BL in the cytokinin-free medium. For in vitro rooting, BL combined with 0.1 mg/L mT + 0.5 mg/L IBA produced the highest rooting percentage (80.00 ± 5.77%), the highest number of roots (3.92 ± 0.15), and the longest roots (75.30 ± 1.76 mm). This treatment also resulted in the highest plantlet establishment rate (71.13 ± 4.43%), confirming the synergy between BL and mT + IBA in improving the efficiency of rosemary rooting and acclimatization. These results enable a more straightforward selection of the optimal light spectrum and PGR concentrations for individual stages of the rosemary micropropagation process and highlight the potential of LED lights as a more efficient alternative to traditional fluorescent lamps. |
Author | Davidović Gidas, Jelena Đekić, Nikolina Zeljković, Svjetlana Đurić, Gordana |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jelena orcidid: 0000-0003-0144-2583 surname: Davidović Gidas fullname: Davidović Gidas, Jelena – sequence: 2 givenname: Svjetlana orcidid: 0000-0002-1948-6907 surname: Zeljković fullname: Zeljković, Svjetlana – sequence: 3 givenname: Nikolina orcidid: 0000-0001-5468-2949 surname: Đekić fullname: Đekić, Nikolina – sequence: 4 givenname: Gordana orcidid: 0000-0001-6781-1105 surname: Đurić fullname: Đurić, Gordana |
BookMark | eNo9kUtLxTAQRoMoeH1sXWepi9akSZp2Kb6hIIiuQ5pO21xqUpJcxX9v6xVX8zEDh_k4J-jQeQcIXVCSUyLra9iOMS9IIXJCSHWANrSkNOOc8cP_XJTH6CTGLSFM1hXfoF1zf4cnO4wpYu06PE_aJTwE_5VGHGDYTTr5EDG4UTsDOI2ArcOfNgWPP3SMeA5-1oNO1jvsexx8hA8dvvElfvVxSdbt4nLorbFOTzbiJr86Q0e9niKc_81T9P5w_3b7lDUvj8-3N01mGJMpE8TIltBWSG6EoJXhVauhhK6Q_VJFAmVgJJOdaDkTdUkFJ9ASUTABpSk5O0XPe27n9VbNwa6fKa-t-l34MCgdkjUTKMo07VtBi1YITimroDaU17wvWdH1GhZWvmeZpWIM0P_zKFGrALUKUKsAtQpgP-fQe2s |
Cites_doi | 10.1088/1755-1315/1029/1/012013 10.17660/actahortic.2022.1337.2 10.5114/bta.2020.92930 10.1017/qpb.2023.9 10.3390/su14074059 10.15835/nsb649464 10.1007/s11240-021-02126-y 10.17660/ActaHortic.2023.1359.13 10.1007/978-981-15-9046-7_9 10.3390/agronomy14061120 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112892 10.3390/agriculture13061265 10.1007/s11627-018-9902-5 10.21273/HORTSCI15078-20 10.1038/nmeth.2019 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1155.92 10.1007/978-981-10-5807-3_12 10.5513/JCEA01/21.4.2909 10.3390/agronomy11091725 10.3390/biom10020178 10.1155/2022/4615079 10.3390/plants11010060 10.1007/978-3-030-38792-1_15 10.15414/jmbfs.2019.9.1.25-28 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113748 10.1007/BF00033737 10.5772/67913 10.17660/ActaHortic.2023.1379.47 10.1007/978-1-4939-8594-4_2 10.1016/B978-0-323-90636-4.00017-9 10.3390/agronomy9070358 10.1590/1519-6984.280778 10.31989/ffhd.v15i1.1526 10.5586/asbp.914 10.1007/s11240-017-1340-2 10.5539/jas.v10n2p301 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111944 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION DOA |
DOI | 10.1079/ejhs.2025.0008 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture |
EISSN | 1611-4434 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_13a1fb512b5541138e9c1494f632dfae 10_1079_ejhs_2025_0008 |
GroupedDBID | 5GY AAYXX AEEJZ AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CITATION EBS EJD FRP GROUPED_DOAJ OK1 SJN Y6R |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-50c7b01b574c5518c48bae6ed27f4267e13ec737d5b435961540eb05235e6c643 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1611-4426 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 00:38:34 EDT 2025 Sun Jul 06 05:06:55 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c337t-50c7b01b574c5518c48bae6ed27f4267e13ec737d5b435961540eb05235e6c643 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-1948-6907 0000-0003-0144-2583 0000-0001-5468-2949 0000-0001-6781-1105 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/13a1fb512b5541138e9c1494f632dfae |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_13a1fb512b5541138e9c1494f632dfae crossref_primary_10_1079_ejhs_2025_0008 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-04-11 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-04-11 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2025 text: 2025-04-11 day: 11 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationTitle | European journal of horticultural science |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | CABI |
Publisher_xml | – name: CABI |
References | Husain Z. M. A. (e_1_3_1_23_1) 2019; 19 Leelavathi D. (e_1_3_1_30_1) 2013; 1 e_1_3_1_22_1 e_1_3_1_44_1 e_1_3_1_24_1 e_1_3_1_25_1 e_1_3_1_9_1 e_1_3_1_8_1 e_1_3_1_41_1 e_1_3_1_20_1 e_1_3_1_42_1 e_1_3_1_21_1 e_1_3_1_43_1 e_1_3_1_5_1 e_1_3_1_4_1 e_1_3_1_7_1 e_1_3_1_6_1 e_1_3_1_26_1 e_1_3_1_27_1 e_1_3_1_3_1 e_1_3_1_28_1 Laslo V. (e_1_3_1_29_1) 2015 e_1_3_1_2_1 e_1_3_1_10_1 e_1_3_1_33_1 e_1_3_1_34_1 e_1_3_1_35_1 e_1_3_1_36_1 e_1_3_1_14_1 e_1_3_1_13_1 e_1_3_1_12_1 e_1_3_1_31_1 e_1_3_1_11_1 Ferreira E.B. (e_1_3_1_18_1) 2011 e_1_3_1_32_1 Sakr S.S. (e_1_3_1_40_1) 2018; 7 e_1_3_1_17_1 e_1_3_1_16_1 e_1_3_1_15_1 e_1_3_1_37_1 e_1_3_1_38_1 e_1_3_1_39_1 e_1_3_1_19_1 |
References_xml | – ident: e_1_3_1_3_1 doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1029/1/012013 – ident: e_1_3_1_35_1 doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2022.1337.2 – ident: e_1_3_1_28_1 doi: 10.5114/bta.2020.92930 – ident: e_1_3_1_32_1 doi: 10.1017/qpb.2023.9 – start-page: 171 year: 2015 ident: e_1_3_1_29_1 article-title: The regenerative and in vitro multiplication capacity of apical tissue of Rosmarinus officinalis L., on mediums with low hormones content publication-title: Analele Univerităţi Din Oradea, Fascicula Protecţia Mediului – ident: e_1_3_1_26_1 doi: 10.3390/su14074059 – ident: e_1_3_1_27_1 doi: 10.15835/nsb649464 – ident: e_1_3_1_24_1 doi: 10.1007/s11240-021-02126-y – ident: e_1_3_1_36_1 doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2023.1359.13 – ident: e_1_3_1_44_1 doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-9046-7_9 – volume: 19 start-page: 1773 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: e_1_3_1_23_1 article-title: Effect of some growth regulators on the multiplication and stimulating the production of the volatile oil of Rosemary officinalis in vitro publication-title: Plant Archives – ident: e_1_3_1_2_1 doi: 10.3390/agronomy14061120 – ident: e_1_3_1_16_1 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112892 – ident: e_1_3_1_37_1 doi: 10.3390/agriculture13061265 – ident: e_1_3_1_6_1 doi: 10.1007/s11627-018-9902-5 – volume: 1 start-page: 51 issue: 6 year: 2013 ident: e_1_3_1_30_1 article-title: An efficient protocol for in vitro aseptic shoot multiplication and plant regeneration of Rosmarinus officinalis – An important medicinal plant using axillary bud publication-title: International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience – ident: e_1_3_1_39_1 – ident: e_1_3_1_10_1 doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI15078-20 – ident: e_1_3_1_41_1 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019 – ident: e_1_3_1_31_1 doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1155.92 – ident: e_1_3_1_14_1 doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-5807-3_12 – ident: e_1_3_1_8_1 doi: 10.5513/JCEA01/21.4.2909 – volume-title: CRAN: Contributed Packages year: 2011 ident: e_1_3_1_18_1 – volume: 7 start-page: 703 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: e_1_3_1_40_1 article-title: In vitro comparative study on Rosmarinus officinalis L. cultivars publication-title: Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research – ident: e_1_3_1_19_1 doi: 10.3390/agronomy11091725 – ident: e_1_3_1_21_1 doi: 10.3390/biom10020178 – ident: e_1_3_1_17_1 doi: 10.1155/2022/4615079 – ident: e_1_3_1_5_1 doi: 10.3390/plants11010060 – ident: e_1_3_1_22_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-38792-1_15 – ident: e_1_3_1_42_1 doi: 10.15414/jmbfs.2019.9.1.25-28 – ident: e_1_3_1_20_1 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113748 – ident: e_1_3_1_33_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00033737 – ident: e_1_3_1_7_1 doi: 10.5772/67913 – ident: e_1_3_1_15_1 doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2023.1379.47 – ident: e_1_3_1_9_1 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8594-4_2 – ident: e_1_3_1_4_1 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-90636-4.00017-9 – ident: e_1_3_1_11_1 doi: 10.3390/agronomy9070358 – ident: e_1_3_1_34_1 doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.280778 – ident: e_1_3_1_43_1 doi: 10.31989/ffhd.v15i1.1526 – ident: e_1_3_1_38_1 doi: 10.5586/asbp.914 – ident: e_1_3_1_12_1 doi: 10.1007/s11240-017-1340-2 – ident: e_1_3_1_13_1 doi: 10.5539/jas.v10n2p301 – ident: e_1_3_1_25_1 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111944 |
SSID | ssj0037984 |
Score | 2.3390653 |
Snippet | Rosemary ( Rosmarinus officinalis L.) is a valuable medicinal and aromatic herb produced for its bioactive compounds and commercial applications. However,... Abstract Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) is a valuable medicinal and aromatic herb produced for its bioactive compounds and commercial applications.... |
SourceID | doaj crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Index Database |
SubjectTerms | blue light in vitro rooting light quality meta-Topolin micropropagation protocol multiplication |
Title | LED lights and plant growth regulators enhance the in vitro mass propagation of rosemary ( Rosmarinus officinalis L.) |
URI | https://doaj.org/article/13a1fb512b5541138e9c1494f632dfae |
Volume | 90 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LT4QwEG6MJz0Yn_GdOZioB5RSaOHoM8aoB6OJN0LLVNesYAD9_c7ArtmbF2-EAJnMNDPf1ynfCHHgdGK88hgYH-sgLpwOiNmmgbJhSWsmimRPFO8f9M1zfPuSvMyM-uIzYYM88OC4U6kK6S2VJUuFT0qVYuYI1cdeq6j0BXL2pZo3JVNDDlYm62cNE5whhkRFaCrXaLJTfO9luiPeS-GhkjPlaEa1vy8v18tiaYIL4WywZ0XMYbUqFs9em4k2Bq6J7u7qEsZMplsg_g-fY_IKvBKP7t6gGWbK100LWL1xKIGgHYwq-B51TQ0fBJKBsiXljz4WUHsgi5D_XIOjx7qli1H11cKgKcHwvIW7k-N18Xx99XRxE0yGJgROKdMFSeiMDaVNTOxYbc3FqS1QYxlRNCJtUCp0RpkysYSUMgI0cYiWN4cT1I7wyYaYr-oKNwWkGunVIvQsameK1CaatTxLX7qoxExuicOp7_LPQRsj73vaJsvZyzl7mbvb6ZY4Z9f-PsWa1v0NinQ-iXT-V6S3_-MjO2KBreJ-kJS7Yr5rvnCPYEVn9_sV9AMZW8ky |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LED+lights+and+plant+growth+regulators+enhance+the+in+vitro+mass+propagation+of+rosemary+%28Rosmarinus+officinalis+L.%29&rft.jtitle=European+journal+of+horticultural+science&rft.au=Jelena+Davidovi%C4%87+Gidas&rft.au=Svjetlana+Zeljkovi%C4%87&rft.au=Nikolina+%C4%90eki%C4%87&rft.au=Gordana+%C4%90uri%C4%87&rft.date=2025-04-11&rft.pub=CABI&rft.issn=1611-4426&rft.eissn=1611-4434&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1079%2Fejhs.2025.0008&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_13a1fb512b5541138e9c1494f632dfae |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1611-4426&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1611-4426&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1611-4426&client=summon |