Efficacy of galcanezumab in patients with chronic migraine and a history of preventive treatment failure
Background Efficacy of galcanezumab in chronic migraine has been demonstrated in a pivotal Phase 3 study. Here, we assess efficacy in patients who have failed ≥2 and ≥1 prior migraine preventives for efficacy and/or safety reasons, and in those who never failed. Study design/methods REGAIN (NCT02614...
Saved in:
Published in | Cephalalgia Vol. 39; no. 8; pp. 931 - 944 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London, England
SAGE Publications
01.07.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background
Efficacy of galcanezumab in chronic migraine has been demonstrated in a pivotal Phase 3 study. Here, we assess efficacy in patients who have failed ≥2 and ≥1 prior migraine preventives for efficacy and/or safety reasons, and in those who never failed.
Study design/methods
REGAIN (NCT02614261) was a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with chronic migraine. Patients were randomized 2:1:1 to receive placebo, galcanezumab 120 mg/240 mg once monthly during a double-blind treatment period lasting three months. Subgroup analyses were conducted among patients who failed ≥2 and ≥1 prior preventives and who never failed previously. Outcomes assessed were change from baseline in number of monthly migraine headache days, proportion of patients with ≥50% and ≥75% response (reduction in monthly migraine headache days), change in number of monthly migraine headache days with acute medication use and change in patient functioning per Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function Restrictive (MSQ RF-R) domain score.
Results
Treatment with galcanezumab versus placebo resulted in significant improvements (p < 0.01) in overall reduction (Months 1–3) from baseline in the number of monthly migraine headache days in patients with prior failures (LS mean change [SE]: ≥2 prior failures: galcanezumab 120 mg: −5.35 (0.71); galcanezumab 240 mg: −2.77 (0.66); placebo: −1.01 (0.54); ≥1 prior failures: galcanezumab 120 mg: −5.53 (0.60), galcanezumab 240 mg: −3.53 (0.59); placebo: −2.02 (0.49). Similarly, significant results were seen with galcanezumab versus placebo for ≥50% and ≥75% response rates, reductions in acute medication use and improvements in MSQ RF-R domain score. In the subgroup with no prior preventive failures, results were statistically significant for the 240 mg galcanezumab group versus placebo on all outcome measures, and for the 120 mg group on the reduction in migraine headache days with acute medication use. There was also a higher placebo response observed in the patients with no prior preventive failures.
Conclusion
Galcanezumab is consistently efficacious versus placebo in reducing monthly migraine headache days and several other key outcomes in patients with chronic migraine who have failed ≥2 or ≥1 preventives previously. In the subgroup with no prior failures, greater numerical differences were seen with galcanezumab, but statistical separation from placebo varied by dose and outcome.
Clinicaltrials.gov identifier number
NCT02614261. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Efficacy of galcanezumab in chronic migraine has been demonstrated in a pivotal Phase 3 study. Here, we assess efficacy in patients who have failed ≥2 and ≥1 prior migraine preventives for efficacy and/or safety reasons, and in those who never failed.
REGAIN (NCT02614261) was a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with chronic migraine. Patients were randomized 2:1:1 to receive placebo, galcanezumab 120 mg/240 mg once monthly during a double-blind treatment period lasting three months. Subgroup analyses were conducted among patients who failed ≥2 and ≥1 prior preventives and who never failed previously. Outcomes assessed were change from baseline in number of monthly migraine headache days, proportion of patients with ≥50% and ≥75% response (reduction in monthly migraine headache days), change in number of monthly migraine headache days with acute medication use and change in patient functioning per Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function Restrictive (MSQ RF-R) domain score.
Treatment with galcanezumab versus placebo resulted in significant improvements (
< 0.01) in overall reduction (Months 1-3) from baseline in the number of monthly migraine headache days in patients with prior failures (LS mean change [SE]: ≥2 prior failures: galcanezumab 120 mg: -5.35 (0.71); galcanezumab 240 mg: -2.77 (0.66); placebo: -1.01 (0.54); ≥1 prior failures: galcanezumab 120 mg: -5.53 (0.60), galcanezumab 240 mg: -3.53 (0.59); placebo: -2.02 (0.49). Similarly, significant results were seen with galcanezumab versus placebo for ≥50% and ≥75% response rates, reductions in acute medication use and improvements in MSQ RF-R domain score. In the subgroup with no prior preventive failures, results were statistically significant for the 240 mg galcanezumab group versus placebo on all outcome measures, and for the 120 mg group on the reduction in migraine headache days with acute medication use. There was also a higher placebo response observed in the patients with no prior preventive failures.
Galcanezumab is consistently efficacious versus placebo in reducing monthly migraine headache days and several other key outcomes in patients with chronic migraine who have failed ≥2 or ≥1 preventives previously. In the subgroup with no prior failures, greater numerical differences were seen with galcanezumab, but statistical separation from placebo varied by dose and outcome.
NCT02614261. Efficacy of galcanezumab in chronic migraine has been demonstrated in a pivotal Phase 3 study. Here, we assess efficacy in patients who have failed ≥2 and ≥1 prior migraine preventives for efficacy and/or safety reasons, and in those who never failed.BACKGROUNDEfficacy of galcanezumab in chronic migraine has been demonstrated in a pivotal Phase 3 study. Here, we assess efficacy in patients who have failed ≥2 and ≥1 prior migraine preventives for efficacy and/or safety reasons, and in those who never failed.REGAIN (NCT02614261) was a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with chronic migraine. Patients were randomized 2:1:1 to receive placebo, galcanezumab 120 mg/240 mg once monthly during a double-blind treatment period lasting three months. Subgroup analyses were conducted among patients who failed ≥2 and ≥1 prior preventives and who never failed previously. Outcomes assessed were change from baseline in number of monthly migraine headache days, proportion of patients with ≥50% and ≥75% response (reduction in monthly migraine headache days), change in number of monthly migraine headache days with acute medication use and change in patient functioning per Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function Restrictive (MSQ RF-R) domain score.STUDY DESIGN/METHODSREGAIN (NCT02614261) was a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with chronic migraine. Patients were randomized 2:1:1 to receive placebo, galcanezumab 120 mg/240 mg once monthly during a double-blind treatment period lasting three months. Subgroup analyses were conducted among patients who failed ≥2 and ≥1 prior preventives and who never failed previously. Outcomes assessed were change from baseline in number of monthly migraine headache days, proportion of patients with ≥50% and ≥75% response (reduction in monthly migraine headache days), change in number of monthly migraine headache days with acute medication use and change in patient functioning per Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function Restrictive (MSQ RF-R) domain score.Treatment with galcanezumab versus placebo resulted in significant improvements (p < 0.01) in overall reduction (Months 1-3) from baseline in the number of monthly migraine headache days in patients with prior failures (LS mean change [SE]: ≥2 prior failures: galcanezumab 120 mg: -5.35 (0.71); galcanezumab 240 mg: -2.77 (0.66); placebo: -1.01 (0.54); ≥1 prior failures: galcanezumab 120 mg: -5.53 (0.60), galcanezumab 240 mg: -3.53 (0.59); placebo: -2.02 (0.49). Similarly, significant results were seen with galcanezumab versus placebo for ≥50% and ≥75% response rates, reductions in acute medication use and improvements in MSQ RF-R domain score. In the subgroup with no prior preventive failures, results were statistically significant for the 240 mg galcanezumab group versus placebo on all outcome measures, and for the 120 mg group on the reduction in migraine headache days with acute medication use. There was also a higher placebo response observed in the patients with no prior preventive failures.RESULTSTreatment with galcanezumab versus placebo resulted in significant improvements (p < 0.01) in overall reduction (Months 1-3) from baseline in the number of monthly migraine headache days in patients with prior failures (LS mean change [SE]: ≥2 prior failures: galcanezumab 120 mg: -5.35 (0.71); galcanezumab 240 mg: -2.77 (0.66); placebo: -1.01 (0.54); ≥1 prior failures: galcanezumab 120 mg: -5.53 (0.60), galcanezumab 240 mg: -3.53 (0.59); placebo: -2.02 (0.49). Similarly, significant results were seen with galcanezumab versus placebo for ≥50% and ≥75% response rates, reductions in acute medication use and improvements in MSQ RF-R domain score. In the subgroup with no prior preventive failures, results were statistically significant for the 240 mg galcanezumab group versus placebo on all outcome measures, and for the 120 mg group on the reduction in migraine headache days with acute medication use. There was also a higher placebo response observed in the patients with no prior preventive failures.Galcanezumab is consistently efficacious versus placebo in reducing monthly migraine headache days and several other key outcomes in patients with chronic migraine who have failed ≥2 or ≥1 preventives previously. In the subgroup with no prior failures, greater numerical differences were seen with galcanezumab, but statistical separation from placebo varied by dose and outcome.CONCLUSIONGalcanezumab is consistently efficacious versus placebo in reducing monthly migraine headache days and several other key outcomes in patients with chronic migraine who have failed ≥2 or ≥1 preventives previously. In the subgroup with no prior failures, greater numerical differences were seen with galcanezumab, but statistical separation from placebo varied by dose and outcome.NCT02614261.CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER NUMBERNCT02614261. Background Efficacy of galcanezumab in chronic migraine has been demonstrated in a pivotal Phase 3 study. Here, we assess efficacy in patients who have failed ≥2 and ≥1 prior migraine preventives for efficacy and/or safety reasons, and in those who never failed. Study design/methods REGAIN (NCT02614261) was a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with chronic migraine. Patients were randomized 2:1:1 to receive placebo, galcanezumab 120 mg/240 mg once monthly during a double-blind treatment period lasting three months. Subgroup analyses were conducted among patients who failed ≥2 and ≥1 prior preventives and who never failed previously. Outcomes assessed were change from baseline in number of monthly migraine headache days, proportion of patients with ≥50% and ≥75% response (reduction in monthly migraine headache days), change in number of monthly migraine headache days with acute medication use and change in patient functioning per Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function Restrictive (MSQ RF-R) domain score. Results Treatment with galcanezumab versus placebo resulted in significant improvements (p < 0.01) in overall reduction (Months 1–3) from baseline in the number of monthly migraine headache days in patients with prior failures (LS mean change [SE]: ≥2 prior failures: galcanezumab 120 mg: −5.35 (0.71); galcanezumab 240 mg: −2.77 (0.66); placebo: −1.01 (0.54); ≥1 prior failures: galcanezumab 120 mg: −5.53 (0.60), galcanezumab 240 mg: −3.53 (0.59); placebo: −2.02 (0.49). Similarly, significant results were seen with galcanezumab versus placebo for ≥50% and ≥75% response rates, reductions in acute medication use and improvements in MSQ RF-R domain score. In the subgroup with no prior preventive failures, results were statistically significant for the 240 mg galcanezumab group versus placebo on all outcome measures, and for the 120 mg group on the reduction in migraine headache days with acute medication use. There was also a higher placebo response observed in the patients with no prior preventive failures. Conclusion Galcanezumab is consistently efficacious versus placebo in reducing monthly migraine headache days and several other key outcomes in patients with chronic migraine who have failed ≥2 or ≥1 preventives previously. In the subgroup with no prior failures, greater numerical differences were seen with galcanezumab, but statistical separation from placebo varied by dose and outcome. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier number NCT02614261. |
Author | Ford, Janet H Khan, Arif Ruff, Dustin D Pearlman, Eric M Wang, Shuu-Jiun Sexson, Matthew Govindan, Sriram Aurora, Sheena K Tockhorn-Heidenreich, Antje |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Dustin D surname: Ruff fullname: Ruff, Dustin D – sequence: 2 givenname: Janet H surname: Ford fullname: Ford, Janet H – sequence: 3 givenname: Antje surname: Tockhorn-Heidenreich fullname: Tockhorn-Heidenreich, Antje – sequence: 4 givenname: Matthew surname: Sexson fullname: Sexson, Matthew – sequence: 5 givenname: Sriram surname: Govindan fullname: Govindan, Sriram – sequence: 6 givenname: Eric M surname: Pearlman fullname: Pearlman, Eric M – sequence: 7 givenname: Shuu-Jiun orcidid: 0000-0001-5179-5358 surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Shuu-Jiun – sequence: 8 givenname: Arif surname: Khan fullname: Khan, Arif – sequence: 9 givenname: Sheena K surname: Aurora fullname: Aurora, Sheena K email: sheena.aurora@lilly.com |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31104507$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kT1v2zAQhokgQeJ87JkKjl3U8kRKlMbCcD-AAF2amThTpM1AIl2ScpH8-tJxshhoJ4K45zngfe-anPvgDSH3wD4BSPmZcc6B1QL6Tsi-kWdkAaLtqrrv6nOyOIyrw_yKXKf0xBhrWtZekisOwETD5IJsV9Y6jfqZBks3OGr05mWecE2dpzvMzvic6B-Xt1RvY_BO08ltIjpvKPqBIt26lEN89XfR7Avv9obmaDBP5UMtunGO5pZcWByTuXt7b8jj19Wv5ffq4ee3H8svD5XmXOYKuMA1aL1uQA59L3uGUnaNLTmRD7q3Nes4tFZa0TaiK6Fr6LVF0Q4gAFt-Qz4e9-5i-D2blNXkkjbjWIKFOam65jWTIAQr6Ic3dF5PZlC76CaMz-q9nQK0R0DHkFI0VmmXSyfB59LAqICpwxnU6RmKyE7E993_UaqjknBj1FOYoy81_Zv_C_k5lOQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_19_32504_8 crossref_primary_10_1186_s10194_021_01322_7 crossref_primary_10_1186_s10194_021_01323_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10072_021_05624_1 crossref_primary_10_1080_14656566_2022_2088281 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40261_021_01115_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurol_2020_04_027 crossref_primary_10_3310_AYWA5297 crossref_primary_10_3390_pharmaceutics12121180 crossref_primary_10_4103_0028_3886_315989 crossref_primary_10_1097_WCO_0000000000000935 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40001_022_00716_w crossref_primary_10_1016_S1474_4422_20_30279_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00415_020_09707_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11136_020_02623_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s15005_020_1258_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40265_020_01329_5 crossref_primary_10_1002_brb3_2799 crossref_primary_10_48208_HeadacheMed_2023_39 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40120_020_00214_3 crossref_primary_10_1186_s41983_024_00834_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00415_021_10523_8 crossref_primary_10_1080_13696998_2023_2248842 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12325_021_01911_7 crossref_primary_10_1080_14737175_2020_1772758 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41582_019_0258_1 |
Cites_doi | 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640 10.1111/head.12055 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.012 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01678.x 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.1.22 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00953.x 10.1177/0333102410381145 10.1177/0333102418779543 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01660.x 10.1517/14728214.2012.709846 10.1212/01.wnl.0000335946.53860.1d 10.1038/s41582-018-0003-1 10.1136/jnnp.2009.192492 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00950.x 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.11.004 10.1007/s11916-013-0385-0 10.1177/0333102416678382 10.1111/ene.12850 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318232ab65 10.1186/1129-2377-15-54 10.1007/s11910-010-0175-6 10.1136/bmj.g1416 10.1097/01.NPR.0000483078.55590.b3 10.1186/s10194-016-0591-3 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182535d20 10.1177/0333102418788347 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.01997.x 10.1517/17425255.2015.1043265 10.1177/0333102414547138 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32534-0 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02748.x 10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.213 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01555.x |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | International Headache Society 2019 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: International Headache Society 2019 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1177/0333102419847957 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1468-2982 |
EndPage | 944 |
ExternalDocumentID | 31104507 10_1177_0333102419847957 10.1177_0333102419847957 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Eli Lilly and Company funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/100004312 |
GroupedDBID | --- -TM .2F .2G .3N .GJ .Y3 01A 0R~ 1OC 29B 31S 31T 31Y 31~ 36B 4.4 53G 54M 5GY 5RE 5VS 6PF 8-1 AABMB AABOD AACKU AADUE AAGGD AAHHS AAJIQ AAJOX AAJPV AANSI AAPEO AAQDB AAQXH AARDL AARIX AASGM AAWTL AAXOT AAYTG AAZBJ ABAWC ABAWP ABCCA ABCQN ABDBF ABDWY ABEIX ABFWQ ABHKI ABIVO ABJIS ABJNI ABKRH ABNCE ABPGX ABQKF ABQXT ABRHV ABVFX ABVVC ABYTW ACARO ACCFJ ACDSZ ACDXX ACFMA ACFYK ACGBL ACGFS ACLHI ACNXM ACOFE ACROE ACRPL ACUHS ACXQS ADBBV ADEBD ADEIA ADMPF ADNBR ADNMO ADOGD ADSTG ADTBJ ADUKL ADYCS ADZOD ADZYD ADZZY AECVZ AEEZP AENEX AEQDE AEQLS AERKM AEUHG AEWDL AEXFG AEXNY AFBPY AFCOW AFEBI AFEET AFKBI AFKRG AFRWT AFUIA AFVCE AFWMB AFZJQ AGNHF AGQPQ AHEFC AIGRN AIWBW AJABX AJAOE AJBDE AJEFB AJMMQ AJSCY AJUZI AJXGE ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ARTOV ASPBG AUTPY AVWKF AYAKG AZFZN B8M B8O B93 BDDNI BFHJK BKSCU BSEHC BYIEH CAG CBRKF CDWPY CFDXU CO8 COF CORYS CQQTX CS3 CUTAK DC- DC. DC0 DC6 DCZOG DD- DD0 DE- DOPDO DU5 D~Y EAD EAP EAS EBC EBD EBS EBX ECV EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ENC EPT ESX F5P FEDTE FZ0 GROUPED_SAGE_PREMIER_JOURNAL_COLLECTION H13 HF~ HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE J8X K.F K.J LH4 LW6 N9A O9- OIG OVD P.B P2P Q1R Q7K Q7R Q7X Q82 Q~Q ROL S01 SASJQ SAUOL SCDPB SCNPE SFC SV3 TEORI TUS W99 WYUIH YFH ZGI ZONMY ZPPRI ZRKOI ZSSAH AAYXX ACHEB CITATION AAEJI AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-134ab1ccb517d99790a7785f331a3dc9f208316f7f46548795219cfa46d141a63 |
IEDL.DBID | AFRWT |
ISSN | 0333-1024 1468-2982 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 05:38:22 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:03:07 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 05:27:22 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:55:10 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:43:10 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 8 |
Keywords | LY2951742 Galcanezumab Phase 3 study chronic migraine preventive failure |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c337t-134ab1ccb517d99790a7785f331a3dc9f208316f7f46548795219cfa46d141a63 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-5179-5358 |
PMID | 31104507 |
PQID | 2232071440 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 14 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2232071440 pubmed_primary_31104507 crossref_citationtrail_10_1177_0333102419847957 crossref_primary_10_1177_0333102419847957 sage_journals_10_1177_0333102419847957 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20190700 2019-07-00 2019-Jul 20190701 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 7 year: 2019 text: 20190700 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | London, England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London, England – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Cephalalgia |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Cephalalgia |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
Publisher_xml | – name: SAGE Publications |
References | Hepp, Dodick, Varon 2015; 35 Finniss, Benedetti 2005; 114 Hepp, Bloudek, Varon 2014; 20 Bagley, Rendas-Baum, Maglinte 2012; 52 Schwedt 2014; 348 Lipton, Varon, Grosberg 2011; 77 Buse, Manack, Serrano 2010; 81 Lanteri-Minet 2014; 18 Pike, Mutebi, Shah 2016; 19 Blumenfeld, Varon, Wilcox 2011; 31 Edvinsson, Haanes, Warfvinge 2018; 14 Ashina, Tepper, Brandes 2018; 38 Reuter, Goadsby, Lanteri-Minet 2018; 392 Dodick, Silberstein, Saper 2007; 47 Dodick, Turkel, DeGryse 2015; 16 Hepp, Dodick, Varon 2017; 37 Moriarty, Mallick-Searle 2016; 41 Silberstein, Holland, Freitag 2012; 78 Negro, Curto, Lionetto 2015; 17 Diener, Schorn, Bingel 2008; 28 Lionetto, Negro, Palmisani 2012; 17 Blumenfeld, Bloudek, Becker 2013; 53 Detke, Goadsby, Wang 2018; 91 Bigal, Lipton 2011; 11 Khalil, Zafar, Quarshie 2014; 15 Skljarevski, Matharu, Millen 2018; 38 Silberstein, Tfelt-Hansen, Dodick 2008; 28 Bigal, Lipton 2008; 71 Ferrari, Baraldi, Sternieri 2015; 11 Evers, Afra, Frese 2009; 16 Cady, Schreiber 2008; 48 Dodick, Turkel, DeGryse 2010; 50 Stauffer, Dodick, Zhang 2018; 75 Kristoffersen, Straand, Russell 2016; 23 bibr15-0333102419847957 bibr28-0333102419847957 bibr23-0333102419847957 bibr2-0333102419847957 bibr10-0333102419847957 bibr31-0333102419847957 bibr7-0333102419847957 bibr29-0333102419847957 bibr16-0333102419847957 bibr22-0333102419847957 bibr35-0333102419847957 bibr25-0333102419847957 bibr3-0333102419847957 bibr13-0333102419847957 bibr8-0333102419847957 Hepp Z (bibr38-0333102419847957) 2014; 20 bibr30-0333102419847957 bibr4-0333102419847957 bibr34-0333102419847957 bibr9-0333102419847957 bibr26-0333102419847957 bibr12-0333102419847957 bibr18-0333102419847957 bibr27-0333102419847957 bibr14-0333102419847957 bibr33-0333102419847957 bibr20-0333102419847957 bibr5-0333102419847957 bibr11-0333102419847957 bibr24-0333102419847957 bibr6-0333102419847957 bibr36-0333102419847957 bibr19-0333102419847957 bibr32-0333102419847957 |
References_xml | – volume: 392 start-page: 2280 year: 2018 end-page: 2287 article-title: Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study publication-title: Lancet – volume: 37 start-page: 470 year: 2017 end-page: 485 article-title: Persistence and switching patterns of oral migraine prophylactic medications among patients with chronic migraine: A retrospective claims analysis publication-title: Cephalalgia – volume: 11 start-page: 1127 year: 2015 end-page: 1144 article-title: Medication overuse and chronic migraine: A critical review according to clinical pharmacology publication-title: Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol – volume: 91 start-page: e2211 year: 2018 end-page: e2221 article-title: Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study publication-title: Neurology – volume: 20 start-page: 22 year: 2014 end-page: 33 article-title: Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence publication-title: J Manag Care Pharm – volume: 75 start-page: 1080 year: 2018 end-page: 1088 article-title: Evaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: The EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial publication-title: JAMA Neurol – volume: 16 start-page: 164 year: 2015 end-page: 175 article-title: Assessing clinically meaningful treatment effects in controlled trials: Chronic migraine as an example publication-title: J Pain – volume: 16 start-page: 968 year: 2009 end-page: 981 article-title: EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine – revised report of an EFNS task force publication-title: Eur J Neurol – volume: 52 start-page: 409 year: 2012 end-page: 421 article-title: Validating Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire v2.1 in episodic and chronic migraine publication-title: Headache – volume: 15 start-page: 54 year: 2014 end-page: 54 article-title: Prospective analysis of the use of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) in the treatment of chronic migraine; real-life data in 254 patients from Hull, UK publication-title: J Headache Pain – volume: 50 start-page: 921 year: 2010 end-page: 936 article-title: OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: Pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program publication-title: Headache – volume: 81 start-page: 428 year: 2010 end-page: 432 article-title: Sociodemographic and comorbidity profiles of chronic migraine and episodic migraine sufferers publication-title: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry – volume: 77 start-page: 1465 year: 2011 end-page: 1472 article-title: OnabotulinumtoxinA improves quality of life and reduces impact of chronic migraine publication-title: Neurology – volume: 41 start-page: 18 year: 2016 end-page: 32 article-title: Diagnosis and treatment for chronic migraine publication-title: Nurse Pract – volume: 19 start-page: A68 year: 2016 end-page: A68 article-title: Factors associated with a history of failure and switching migraine prophylaxis treatment: An analysis of clinical practice data from the United States, Germany, France, and Japan publication-title: Value Health – volume: 48 start-page: 900 year: 2008 end-page: 913 article-title: Botulinum toxin type A as migraine preventive treatment in patients previously failing oral prophylactic treatment due to compliance issues publication-title: Headache – volume: 71 start-page: 1821 year: 2008 end-page: 1828 article-title: Excessive acute migraine medication use and migraine progression publication-title: Neurology – volume: 14 start-page: 338 year: 2018 end-page: 350 article-title: CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies – successful translation from bench to clinic publication-title: Nat Rev Neurol – volume: 38 start-page: 1611 year: 2018 end-page: 1621 article-title: Efficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in chronic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: A subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study publication-title: Cephalalgia – volume: 17 start-page: 393 year: 2012 end-page: 406 article-title: Emerging treatment for chronic migraine and refractory chronic migraine publication-title: Expert Opin Emerg Drugs – volume: 348 start-page: g1416 year: 2014 end-page: g1416 article-title: Chronic migraine publication-title: BMJ – volume: 47 start-page: 1398 year: 2007 end-page: 1408 article-title: The impact of topiramate on health-related quality of life indicators in chronic migraine publication-title: Headache – volume: 28 start-page: 1003 year: 2008 end-page: 1011 article-title: The importance of placebo in headache research publication-title: Cephalalgia – volume: 17 start-page: 1 year: 2015 end-page: 1 article-title: A two years open-label prospective study of OnabotulinumtoxinA 195 U in medication overuse headache: A real-world experience publication-title: J Headache Pain – volume: 35 start-page: 478 year: 2015 end-page: 488 article-title: Adherence to oral migraine-preventive medications among patients with chronic migraine publication-title: Cephalalgia – volume: 31 start-page: 301 year: 2011 end-page: 315 article-title: Disability, HRQoL and resource use among chronic and episodic migraineurs: Results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS) publication-title: Cephalalgia – volume: 28 start-page: 484 year: 2008 end-page: 495 article-title: Guidelines for controlled trials of prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine in adults publication-title: Cephalalgia – volume: 23 start-page: S28 year: 2016 end-page: S35 article-title: Disability, anxiety and depression in patients with medication-overuse headache in primary care – the BIMOH study publication-title: Eur J Neurol – volume: 53 start-page: 644 year: 2013 end-page: 655 article-title: Patterns of use and reasons for discontinuation of prophylactic medications for episodic migraine and chronic migraine: Results from the second International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS-II) publication-title: Headache – volume: 11 start-page: 139 year: 2011 end-page: 148 article-title: Migraine chronification publication-title: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep – volume: 78 start-page: 1337 year: 2012 end-page: 1345 article-title: Evidence-based guideline update: Pharmacologic treatment for episodic migraine prevention in adults: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Headache Society publication-title: Neurology – volume: 18 start-page: 385 year: 2014 end-page: 385 article-title: Economic burden and costs of chronic migraine publication-title: Curr Pain Headache Rep – volume: 114 start-page: 3 year: 2005 end-page: 6 article-title: Mechanisms of the placebo response and their impact on clinical trials and clinical practice publication-title: Pain – volume: 38 start-page: 1442 year: 2018 end-page: 1454 article-title: Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: Results of the EVOLVE-2 Phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial publication-title: Cephalalgia – ident: bibr16-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640 – ident: bibr4-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1111/head.12055 – ident: bibr27-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.012 – ident: bibr32-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01678.x – volume: 20 start-page: 22 year: 2014 ident: bibr38-0333102419847957 publication-title: J Manag Care Pharm doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.1.22 – ident: bibr30-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00953.x – ident: bibr7-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1177/0333102410381145 – ident: bibr29-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1177/0333102418779543 – ident: bibr26-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01660.x – ident: bibr22-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1517/14728214.2012.709846 – ident: bibr11-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000335946.53860.1d – ident: bibr15-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0003-1 – ident: bibr2-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.192492 – ident: bibr36-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00950.x – ident: bibr33-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.11.004 – ident: bibr3-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1007/s11916-013-0385-0 – ident: bibr5-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1177/0333102416678382 – ident: bibr10-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1111/ene.12850 – ident: bibr35-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318232ab65 – ident: bibr31-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-15-54 – ident: bibr12-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1007/s11910-010-0175-6 – ident: bibr8-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1416 – ident: bibr9-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000483078.55590.b3 – ident: bibr23-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1186/s10194-016-0591-3 – ident: bibr18-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182535d20 – ident: bibr24-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1177/0333102418788347 – ident: bibr28-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212 – ident: bibr20-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.01997.x – ident: bibr13-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1517/17425255.2015.1043265 – ident: bibr6-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1177/0333102414547138 – ident: bibr25-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32534-0 – ident: bibr19-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02748.x – ident: bibr14-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.213 – ident: bibr34-0333102419847957 doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01555.x |
SSID | ssj0005606 |
Score | 2.415939 |
Snippet | Background
Efficacy of galcanezumab in chronic migraine has been demonstrated in a pivotal Phase 3 study. Here, we assess efficacy in patients who have failed... Efficacy of galcanezumab in chronic migraine has been demonstrated in a pivotal Phase 3 study. Here, we assess efficacy in patients who have failed ≥2 and ≥1... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref sage |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 931 |
Title | Efficacy of galcanezumab in patients with chronic migraine and a history of preventive treatment failure |
URI | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0333102419847957 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31104507 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2232071440 |
Volume | 39 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1RT9swED6xIqG9TNtgW9mGjIQm8RCa2I5dP02wUaFJ8DCB4C2ynZhVWtOKNkjw63fXOEWANu01cuLkfLa_-L77DmCPmFMmdT6xUvpEKiuTIQ86KbPUqdy6lBtKTj49UycX8sdVfrUGdZcLEy04PyBaFb7RcrGm2U2n0YMYZBykQiAswc3H4OJqcv21WUyK9rS7K6pBVyg83Uwosu2JD3mXdNltL2Cda5XzHqwfjn5enj-QQlTaRjcFMba4fAhsPuvz8Ub2DJ0-YoYtN6vRa3gVUSY7bN3iDaxV9VvYOI1x9E34dUzKEdbfsWlguEegfav7ZmIdG9csSq3OGZ3RMt-q57LJ-JqqSVTM1iWzrNUpXt4_iypQtxVb0dZZsGMivG_Bxej4_NtJEmsuJF4ITZXppXWZ9y7PdGmMNqnVepgH_HYrSm8Cp9JkKuhAQmxUqRyXPB-sVGUmM6vEO-jV07r6AMxwa5wRw2AD_uOp1ElTBZVZ70gCp-J9GHQGLHwUJKe6GL-LrNMgf2LyPuyv7pi1Yhz_aLvbjUmBM4bCIGjKaTMvEBBxStuSaR_et4O1eppANCQRIvfhC41e0bnjX7vZ_t-GH-ElYi3TMn0_QW9x01SfEc8s3A464dH3o9FOdMY_mNbtCQ |
linkProvider | SAGE Publications |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1NTxsxEB3RILVcqtIvQr9cqa3Uw7a7ttcbH3pALVEohEMVVG5b22uXSLBBhLSCf8S_7EzWGwSoVS_cba814_E8r5_fALwh5pROrUuMlC6Rysikx0ORVFlqVW5syjU9Th7uqsGe_Lqf7y_BRfsWJlpw-oFoVTij-Wa9iG5SShICEQnmHY37qs6LyKfc9me_8bQ2_bT1BV37lvP-5ujzIIkFBRInREFl16WxmXM2z4pK60Knpih6ecARjaicDpzqbqlQBFIZozLcGM8uGKmqTGZGCRz3DizLHDf-Dixv9L99H13ySVTaXIwKIntxeXknemPOV3PgDWB7hVQ2z3P9B3A_AlS20ayoVVjy9UO4O4xX8I_gYJNEJ4w7Y5PAML2ga_z57MhYNq5ZVGmdMvq9y1wjvMuOxj-pEIVnpq6YYY3E8bz_cRSQ-uXZgvHOghkTV_4x7N2KdZ9Ap57Ufg2Y5kZbLXrBBDweqtRK7YPKjLOknuN5Fz62Bixd1DKnkhqHZdbKl18zeRfeL3ocNzoe_2j7uvVJicFGNyhoyslsWiKW4vTiS6ZdeNo4azGaQCAlEV134R15r2xX8l8_s_6_DV_BvcFouFPubO1uP4MVhGy6IQw_h87pycy_QFh0al_GBcngx23HwB9vlREa |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT9wwEB7RRUK9VG3pY-nLSLRSD-kmtuOsDz2gwgrKQ1UFKrfUdux2Jciuumwr-E_8x85snEWAqHrhbjvWjMf-nPn8DcAaMad0al1ipHSJVEYmfR6KpMpSq3JjU67pcfLevto6lJ-P8qMFuGjfwkQLTj4QrQpnNNusKbrHVejFHGMvFQJRCZ49GvdWnReRU7njz_7gjW3ycXsD3fuW88HmwaetJBYVSJwQBZVel8Zmztk8KyqtC52aoujnAUc0onI6cKq9pUIRSGmMSnFjTLtgpKoymRklcNx7sCgl3ik7sLg--Prt4JJTotImOSqI8MXlZV70xpyvnoM3wO0VYtnsrBs8hAcRpLL1ZlU9ggVfP4alvZiGX4afmyQ8YdwZGwWGRwy6x59PT4xlw5pFpdYJo1-8zDXiu-xk-IOKUXhm6ooZ1sgcz_qPo4jUb8_mrHcWzJD48k_g8E6s-xQ69aj2z4FpbrTVoh9MwCuiSq3UPqjMOEsKOp53odcasHRRz5zKahyXWSthfs3kXXg_7zFutDz-0Xa19UmJAUdZFDTlaDopEU9xevUl0y48a5w1H00gmJKIsLvwjrxXtqv51s-s_G_DN7D0ZWNQ7m7v77yA-4jadMMZfgmd019T_wqR0al9Hdcjg-93HQJ_Ad0OEjM |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy+of+galcanezumab+in+patients+with+chronic+migraine+and+a+history+of+preventive+treatment+failure&rft.jtitle=Cephalalgia&rft.au=Ruff%2C+Dustin+D&rft.au=Ford%2C+Janet+H&rft.au=Tockhorn-Heidenreich%2C+Antje&rft.au=Sexson%2C+Matthew&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.issn=0333-1024&rft.eissn=1468-2982&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=931&rft.epage=944&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F0333102419847957&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1177_0333102419847957 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0333-1024&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0333-1024&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0333-1024&client=summon |