Achievement of minimal clinically important difference in shoulder function after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a surgical procedure to relieve pain and improve shoulder function. This study aimed to investigate the percentage of patients achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score following RSA and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Joint Surgery and Research Vol. 3; no. 1; pp. 31 - 34
Main Authors Kubo, Yumi, Kubo, Naoyuki, Yamakado, Kotaro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.03.2025
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a surgical procedure to relieve pain and improve shoulder function. This study aimed to investigate the percentage of patients achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score following RSA and to examine factors associated with MCID achievement. This study included 74 patients (26 males and 48 females; mean age 76.9 ​± ​4.7 years) who underwent RSA between January 2019 and July 2022. Patients were grouped based on the change in ASES total score from pre-operative to 1 year post-operative as follows: not achieved group (<16 point change); and improvement criteria achieved group (≥16 point change). Overall, 81% of patients achieved an ASES score change of ≥16 points. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the two groups. However, the not achieved group had a significantly lower pre-operative pain visual analog scale score and a significantly higher pre-operative ASES total score than the improvement criteria achieved group. Logistic regression analysis identified pre-operative ASES total score as significantly associated with MCID achievement (odds ratio ​= ​0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.87–0.96; p ​= ​0.0007). The rate of patients achieving a ≥16 point improvement in the ASES total score after RSA was 81%. A high pre-operative ASES total score was identified as a factor limiting MCID achievement, suggesting that patients with a high pre-operative function may experience less significant post-operative improvement. •Achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was studied.•81% of patients achieved ≥16 points improvement (MCID) in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score.•A high pre-operative ASES score may not improve significantly after RSA.•These findings provide valuable insights into patient selection for RSA.
AbstractList Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a surgical procedure to relieve pain and improve shoulder function. This study aimed to investigate the percentage of patients achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score following RSA and to examine factors associated with MCID achievement. This study included 74 patients (26 males and 48 females; mean age 76.9 ​± ​4.7 years) who underwent RSA between January 2019 and July 2022. Patients were grouped based on the change in ASES total score from pre-operative to 1 year post-operative as follows: not achieved group (<16 point change); and improvement criteria achieved group (≥16 point change). Overall, 81% of patients achieved an ASES score change of ≥16 points. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the two groups. However, the not achieved group had a significantly lower pre-operative pain visual analog scale score and a significantly higher pre-operative ASES total score than the improvement criteria achieved group. Logistic regression analysis identified pre-operative ASES total score as significantly associated with MCID achievement (odds ratio ​= ​0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.87–0.96; p ​= ​0.0007). The rate of patients achieving a ≥16 point improvement in the ASES total score after RSA was 81%. A high pre-operative ASES total score was identified as a factor limiting MCID achievement, suggesting that patients with a high pre-operative function may experience less significant post-operative improvement. •Achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was studied.•81% of patients achieved ≥16 points improvement (MCID) in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score.•A high pre-operative ASES score may not improve significantly after RSA.•These findings provide valuable insights into patient selection for RSA.
Purpose: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a surgical procedure to relieve pain and improve shoulder function. This study aimed to investigate the percentage of patients achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score following RSA and to examine factors associated with MCID achievement. Methods: This study included 74 patients (26 males and 48 females; mean age 76.9 ​± ​4.7 years) who underwent RSA between January 2019 and July 2022. Patients were grouped based on the change in ASES total score from pre-operative to 1 year post-operative as follows: not achieved group (<16 point change); and improvement criteria achieved group (≥16 point change). Results: Overall, 81% of patients achieved an ASES score change of ≥16 points. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the two groups. However, the not achieved group had a significantly lower pre-operative pain visual analog scale score and a significantly higher pre-operative ASES total score than the improvement criteria achieved group. Logistic regression analysis identified pre-operative ASES total score as significantly associated with MCID achievement (odds ratio ​= ​0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.87–0.96; p ​= ​0.0007). Conclusions: The rate of patients achieving a ≥16 point improvement in the ASES total score after RSA was 81%. A high pre-operative ASES total score was identified as a factor limiting MCID achievement, suggesting that patients with a high pre-operative function may experience less significant post-operative improvement.
Author Yamakado, Kotaro
Kubo, Naoyuki
Kubo, Yumi
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yumi
  orcidid: 0009-0006-4721-0787
  surname: Kubo
  fullname: Kubo, Yumi
  email: ptyumikubo0913@gmail.com
  organization: Department of Rehabilitation, Fukui General Clinic, 1-42-1 Nittazuka, Fukui-shi, Fukui 910-0067, Japan
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Naoyuki
  surname: Kubo
  fullname: Kubo, Naoyuki
  organization: Department of Rehabilitation, Fukui General Hospital, 58-16-1 Egami, Fukui City, Fukui 910-8561, Japan
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Kotaro
  orcidid: 0000-0003-4891-463X
  surname: Yamakado
  fullname: Yamakado, Kotaro
  organization: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukui General Hospital, 58-16-1 Egami, Fukui City, Fukui 910-8561, Japan
BookMark eNqFkU1qHDEQhUVwwI7jG3ihC0xHav21QggYkx-DIZtkLTTVJY86Pa1B6hnoQ-TO0WQcx2TjlUoqvY969d6QsylNSMg1Zw1nXL8bmmFIseSmZa1sOG8YU6_IRWulXRmm-Nmz-pxclTIwxlpruebqgvy6gU3EA25xmmkKdBunuPUjhbEW4MdxoXG7S3n2td_HEDDjBEjjRMsm7cceMw37CeaYJurDXK-54nLBf32f501Ou9GXeXlPff0w51R2WEUHpJA2FU_LvO-Xt-R18GPBq8fzkvz4_On77dfV_bcvd7c39ysQwqiVXLedUQq0lt4DBCXWNhivAyAIrnSnut4LAVIFDSZYBb1B3wodtGUSjbgkdydun_zgdrlazotLPro_Dyk_uDp0hBFdJ-Taew7a9lx2gVkluW9bLg0XRiuoLHliQTVVMoYnHmfumJAb3Ckhd0zIce5qQlX28STD6vMQMbsC8bjaPua6mTpIfAnw4T_A38x-4vKy_DeBQLXU
Cites_doi 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6
10.1097/PHM.0000000000001169
10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.041
10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.007
10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.031
10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.014
10.1016/j.jse.2015.04.015
10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.013
10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.007
10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.029
10.1097/CORR.0000000000001263
10.1016/j.jse.2015.07.020
10.1007/s12178-020-09684-2
10.1007/s11999-016-4968-z
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 The Author(s)
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 The Author(s)
DBID 6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
DOA
DOI 10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005
DatabaseName ScienceDirect Open Access Titles
Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access
CrossRef
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 2949-7051
EndPage 34
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_834baa1c69d148f09541a2214713765c
10_1016_j_jjoisr_2024_11_005
S2949705124000331
GroupedDBID .1-
.FO
0R~
AALRI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ACVFH
ADCNI
ADVLN
AEUPX
AFPUW
AFRHN
AIGII
AITUG
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
EBS
FDB
GROUPED_DOAJ
M41
ROL
Z5R
6I.
AAFTH
AAYXX
CITATION
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3375-4b28755c664aaccf53b9f7a6fcec3156858da33c45f6c7f95cd7ea236f6904e73
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2949-7051
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:30:14 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 05:23:14 EDT 2025
Sat Mar 15 15:43:50 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 26 19:06:13 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords ASES score
RSA
MCID
Minimal clinically important difference
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score
Language English
License This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3375-4b28755c664aaccf53b9f7a6fcec3156858da33c45f6c7f95cd7ea236f6904e73
ORCID 0009-0006-4721-0787
0000-0003-4891-463X
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/834baa1c69d148f09541a2214713765c
PageCount 4
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_834baa1c69d148f09541a2214713765c
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jjoisr_2024_11_005
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jjoisr_2024_11_005
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_jjoisr_2024_11_005
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate March 2025
2025-03-00
2025-03-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2025
  text: March 2025
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Journal of Joint Surgery and Research
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Elsevier B.V
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier B.V
– name: Elsevier
References Helmkamp, Bullock, Amilo, Guerrero, Ledbetter, Sell (bib10) 2018; 27
Wener, Chang, Nguyen, Dines, Gulotta (bib5) 2016; 474
Berglund, Law, Rosa, Kurowicki, Giveans, Mijic (bib9) 2018; 28
Su, Allahabadi, Bongbong, Feeley, Lansdown (bib7) 2021; 14
Kumar, Roche, Overman, Simovitch, Flurin, Wright (bib13) 2020; 478
Torrens, Guirro, Santana (bib12) 2016; 25
Simovitch, Flurin, Wright, Zuckerman, Roche (bib4) 2018; 27
Levy, Everding, Gil, Stephens, Giveans (bib11) 2014; 23
Dabija, Jain (bib2) 2019; 98
Tashjian, Hung, Keener, Bowen, McAllister, Chen (bib3) 2017; 26
Gowd, Charles, Liu, Lalehzarian, Cabarcas, Manderle (bib8) 2019; 28
Wong, Zhang, Berliner, Ma, Feeley (bib6) 2016; 25
Jaeschke, Singer, Guyatt (bib1) 1989; 10
Hartzler, Steen, Hussey, Cusick, Cottrell, Clark (bib14) 2015; 24
Helmkamp (10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib10) 2018; 27
Torrens (10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib12) 2016; 25
Dabija (10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib2) 2019; 98
Levy (10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib11) 2014; 23
Jaeschke (10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib1) 1989; 10
Kumar (10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib13) 2020; 478
Gowd (10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib8) 2019; 28
Wong (10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib6) 2016; 25
Berglund (10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib9) 2018; 28
Simovitch (10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib4) 2018; 27
Tashjian (10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib3) 2017; 26
Hartzler (10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib14) 2015; 24
Wener (10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib5) 2016; 474
Su (10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib7) 2021; 14
References_xml – volume: 14
  start-page: 27
  year: 2021
  end-page: 46
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state of outcome measures relating to shoulder pathology and surgery: a systematic review
  publication-title: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med
– volume: 98
  start-page: 671
  year: 2019
  end-page: 676
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Minimal clinically important difference of shoulder outcome measures and diagnoses: a systematic review
  publication-title: Am J Phys Med Rehabil
– volume: 478
  start-page: 2351
  year: 2020
  end-page: 2363
  ident: bib13
  article-title: What is the accuracy of three different machine learning techniques to predict clinical outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty?
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
– volume: 474
  start-page: 2672
  year: 2016
  end-page: 2681
  ident: bib5
  article-title: What change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score represents a clinically important change after shoulder arthroplasty?
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1698
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1706
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive rotator cuff tear: risk factors for poor functional improvement
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 23
  start-page: 1872
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1881
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Speed of recovery after shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 26
  start-page: 144
  year: 2017
  end-page: 148
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain after shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 25
  start-page: 913
  year: 2016
  end-page: 919
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Preoperative patient-reported scores can predict postoperative outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 28
  start-page: 335
  year: 2018
  end-page: 340
  ident: bib9
  article-title: The procedure value index: a new method for quantifying value in shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 28
  start-page: 2238
  year: 2019
  end-page: 2246
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a reliable metric to measure clinically significant improvements following shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 25
  start-page: 262
  year: 2016
  end-page: 268
  ident: bib12
  article-title: The minimal clinically important difference for function and strength in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 10
  start-page: 407
  year: 1989
  end-page: 415
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference
  publication-title: Control Clin Trials
– volume: 27
  start-page: 298
  year: 2018
  end-page: 305
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 27
  start-page: 2099
  year: 2018
  ident: bib10
  article-title: The clinical and radiographic impact of center of rotation lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
– volume: 10
  start-page: 407
  year: 1989
  ident: 10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib1
  article-title: Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference
  publication-title: Control Clin Trials
  doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6
– volume: 98
  start-page: 671
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib2
  article-title: Minimal clinically important difference of shoulder outcome measures and diagnoses: a systematic review
  publication-title: Am J Phys Med Rehabil
  doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001169
– volume: 28
  start-page: 2238
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib8
  article-title: Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a reliable metric to measure clinically significant improvements following shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.041
– volume: 26
  start-page: 144
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib3
  article-title: Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain after shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.007
– volume: 28
  start-page: 335
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib9
  article-title: The procedure value index: a new method for quantifying value in shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.031
– volume: 23
  start-page: 1872
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib11
  article-title: Speed of recovery after shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.014
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1698
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib14
  article-title: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive rotator cuff tear: risk factors for poor functional improvement
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.04.015
– volume: 27
  start-page: 298
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib4
  article-title: Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.013
– volume: 27
  start-page: 2099
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib10
  article-title: The clinical and radiographic impact of center of rotation lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.007
– volume: 25
  start-page: 913
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib6
  article-title: Preoperative patient-reported scores can predict postoperative outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.01.029
– volume: 478
  start-page: 2351
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib13
  article-title: What is the accuracy of three different machine learning techniques to predict clinical outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty?
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
  doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001263
– volume: 25
  start-page: 262
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib12
  article-title: The minimal clinically important difference for function and strength in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  publication-title: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.07.020
– volume: 14
  start-page: 27
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib7
  article-title: Minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state of outcome measures relating to shoulder pathology and surgery: a systematic review
  publication-title: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med
  doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09684-2
– volume: 474
  start-page: 2672
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005_bib5
  article-title: What change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score represents a clinically important change after shoulder arthroplasty?
  publication-title: Clin Orthop Relat Res
  doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4968-z
SSID ssj0002991615
Score 2.2915542
Snippet Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a surgical procedure to relieve pain and improve shoulder function. This study aimed to investigate the percentage of...
Purpose: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a surgical procedure to relieve pain and improve shoulder function. This study aimed to investigate the...
SourceID doaj
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Open Website
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 31
SubjectTerms American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score
ASES score
MCID
Minimal clinically important difference
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
RSA
Title Achievement of minimal clinically important difference in shoulder function after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S2949705124000331
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.11.005
https://doaj.org/article/834baa1c69d148f09541a2214713765c
Volume 3
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV09T8MwELUQEwsCAaJ8yQNrQIntOGUriKpiYKJSN8vxh5qKJigNQ38E_5k7JynZurDGdhLd2b530t17hNwLbrEll0foXEhQpIx05rJIGgfROmfCttUW7-lszt8WYjGQ-sKasJYeuDXcY8Z4rnVs0rEF5O4BEfBYJ6iuE8PZEAZvX4h5g2QK7-AEYU8s-l65UNC1WlXFBilAE_6AxJ2oWDeIRYGyfxCSBmFmekKOO3xIJ-1_nZIDV56Rn4lZFi4weze08hT5QNYwq29r_NzSYh2ANIz3kifG0aKkmyVqWLuaYgBDJ9CgCk6RuaneuL9xsAQqJgCYbrZPVMOEpq76PkyKOrp1QwMZ7TmZT18_XmZRp6MQGcakiHgOaZEQJk251sZ4wfKxlzr1xhkG-VsmMqsZM1z41Eg_FsZKpxOWekiduZPsghyWVekuCeUAF23OBUvhHFvGtbEu05AlAuwCb4sRiXqLqq-WLkP1dWQr1XpAoQcg81DggRF5RrPv5iLZdXgAW0B1W0Dt2wIjInqnqd7wcAPCi4o9H5e7dR3eaHHE3pVX__Hb1-QoQTHhUNB2Qw6b-tvdAsJp8ruwmX8Bdo76kw
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Achievement+of+minimal+clinically+important+difference+in+shoulder+function+after+reverse+shoulder+arthroplasty%3A+a+retrospective+cohort+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+Joint+Surgery+and+Research&rft.au=Kubo%2C+Yumi&rft.au=Kubo%2C+Naoyuki&rft.au=Yamakado%2C+Kotaro&rft.date=2025-03-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+B.V&rft.issn=2949-7051&rft.eissn=2949-7051&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=34&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jjoisr.2024.11.005&rft.externalDocID=S2949705124000331
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2949-7051&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2949-7051&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2949-7051&client=summon