Accuracy of telephone triage in primary care patients with chest discomfort: a cross-sectional study

• Published in: Open heart Vol. 7; no. 2; p. e001376
• Main Authors: Wouters, Loes Tcm, Rutten, Frans H, Erkelens, Daphne Ca, De Groot, Esther, Damoiseaux, Roger Amj, Zwart, Dorien Lm
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group 01.08.2020
• Series: Original research
• Subjects: Acute Coronary Syndrome - diagnosis; Acute Coronary Syndrome - therapy; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angina Pectoris - diagnosis; Angina Pectoris - therapy; Clinical Decision-Making; Coronary Artery Disease; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diagnosis, Differential; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Primary Health Care; Prognosis; Reproducibility of Results; Telephone; Time-to-Treatment; Triage; primary care; acute coronary syndrome; emergency medicine; general practice
• DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001376
• ISSN: 2053-3624

To assess the accuracy of semi-automatic assisted telephone triage in patients with acute chest discomfort against the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or other life-threatening events (LTEs). A cross-sectional study was performed of telephone conversations with 2023 patients with acute chest discomfort (pain, pressure, tightness or discomfort) who called out-of-hours services for primary care (OHS-PC) between 2014 and 2016. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicted values were calculated for a high urgency (patient seen within one hour) against the diagnoses of ACS and other LTEs. Diagnoses were retrieved from the patients' medical records in general practice, including hospital specialists' discharge letters. Of 2023 patients who called because of chest discomfort, 227 (11.2%) had an ACS (men 14.9%, women 8.2%) and 58 (2.9%) had another LTE (men 3.6%, women 2.3%). The sensitivity and specificity of a high Netherlands Triage System (NTS) urgency allocation against ACS/other LTEs were 0.73 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.78) and 0.43 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.45), respectively. In 13.2% of the calls the triage nurse overruled the NTS urgency, mostly by upscaling (11.0%). The sensitivity and specificity of the final urgency allocation were 0.86 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.90) and 0.34 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.37). The positive and negative predictive values of the final urgency were 0.18 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.19) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.95), respectively. The semi-automatic triage NTS tool underestimated the urgency in 27% of patients with ACS/other LTEs. Overruling by triage nurses improved safety, but still 14% of men and women with ACS/other LTEs received too low urgency, while efficiency remained poor. NTR7331.