Early Clinical Outcomes of a New Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty Design

• Published in: Orthopedics (Thorofare, N.J.) Vol. 41; no. 6; pp. e765 - 771
• Main Authors: Cohen, Russell G, Sherman, Nathan C, James, Sheridan L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States SLACK INCORPORATED 01.11.2018
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods; Blood Loss, Surgical; Body mass index; Bone Cements - therapeutic use; Cement; Clinical outcomes; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hydroxyapatite; Joint surgery; Knee; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging; Knee Joint - physiopathology; Knee Joint - surgery; Knee Prosthesis; Male; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Patients; Polyethylene; Postoperative Period; Prosthesis Design; Radiography; Range of Motion, Articular; Retrospective Studies; Surgeons; Transplants & implants; Treatment Outcome; Triathlon; United States > US
• DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20180828-05
• ISSN: 0147-7447

Cementless fixation design failures led to low use of this alternative technology. A cementless total knee arthroplasty addressed these design flaws. The single radius knee design incorporated additive manufacturing to produce the tibial and patellar implants. Both implants have enhanced porous substrates, optimizing initial bony ingrowth. A nonrandomized prospective review was conducted of 72 cementless knees followed for a minimum of 2 years (mean, 37 months). Surgical time, estimated blood loss, and range of motion at 6 weeks were compared with those of a matched cohort of 70 cemented knees performed by the same surgeon. Knee Society Score and Oxford Knee Score were recorded for the cementless group. Radiographs were evaluated for change in implant position, subsidence, and radiolucent and sclerotic lines. Operative time was statistically shorter in the cementless group (40 vs 45 minutes), but there was no significant difference in postoperative estimated blood loss (557 vs 355 mL). Range of motion at 6 weeks averaged 118° in the cementless group vs 114° in the cemented group. Knee Society Score improved from 53.9 preoperatively to 85.0 at 6 weeks and 91.6 at most recent follow-up. Oxford Knee Score improved from 23.9 preoperatively to 31.7 at 6 weeks and 43.4 at most recent follow-up. No implants aseptically loosened or migrated. There were 2 early infections in the cemented group requiring revision. This cementless total knee arthroplasty revealed excellent clinical results at 3-year follow-up and resulted in shortened operative times. Biologic fixation was achieved in 100% of patients with improved functional and objective scores. Early results are encouraging, and this cementless total knee arthroplasty appears to provide an excellent alternative to cemented total knee arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(6):e765-e771.].