Validation of a Novel Mobile Application for Assessing Pediatric Tracheostomy Emergency Simulations

• Published in: OTO open : the official open access journal of the American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery Foundation Vol. 8; no. 3; pp. e145 - n/a
• Main Authors: Tawfik, Marc‐Mina, Schiff, Elliot, Mosavian, Roxanna, Campisi, Christine, Shen, Amanda, Lin, Juan, Windsor, Alanna M., Weingarten‐Arams, Jacqueline, Soshnick, Sara H., Nishisaki, Akira, Je, Sangmo, Maa, Tensing, Harwayne‐Gidansky, Ilana, Fortunov, Regine M., Yang, Christina J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States John Wiley and Sons Inc 01.07.2024; Wiley
• Subjects: healthcare simulation; mobile applications; patient safety; Patient Safety and Quality Improvement; quality improvement; tracheostomy; tracheotomy; patient safety; tracheotomy; tracheostomy; healthcare simulation; quality improvement; mobile applications
• DOI: 10.1002/oto2.145
• ISSN: 2473-974X

Objective Pediatric tracheostomy is associated with high morbidity and mortality, yet clinician knowledge and quality of tracheostomy care may vary widely. In situ simulation is effective at detecting and mitigating related latent safety threats, but evaluation via retrospective video review has disadvantages (eg, delayed analysis, and potential data loss). We evaluated whether a novel mobile application is accurate and reliable for assessment of in situ tracheostomy emergency simulations. Methods A novel mobile application was developed for assessment of tracheostomy emergency in situ simulation team performance. After 1.25 hours of training, 6 raters scored 10 tracheostomy emergency simulation videos for the occurrence and timing of 12 critical steps. To assess accuracy, rater scores were compared to a reference standard to determine agreement for occurrence or absence of critical steps and a timestamp within ±5 seconds. Interrater reliability was determined through Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient. Results Raters had 86.0% agreement with the reference standard when considering step occurrence and timing, and 92.8% agreement when considering only occurrence. The average timestamp difference from the reference standard was 1.3 ± 18.5 seconds. Overall interrater reliability was almost perfect for both step occurrence (Fleiss' kappa of 0.81) and timing of step (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.99). Discussion Using our novel mobile application, raters with minimal training accurately and reliably assessed videos of tracheostomy emergency simulations and identified areas for future refinement. Implications for Practice With refinements, this innovative mobile application is an effective tool for real‐time data capture of time‐critical steps in in situ tracheostomy emergency simulations.