Monitoring Uterine Activity during Labor: Clinician Interpretation of Electrohysterography versus Intrauterine Pressure Catheter and Tocodynamometry

• Published in: American journal of perinatology Vol. 33; no. 9; p. 831
• Main Authors: Euliano, Tammy Y, Nguyen, Minh Tam, Darmanjian, Shalom, Busowski, John D, Euliano, Neil, Gregg, Anthony R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.07.2016
• Subjects: Adult; Catheters; Electromyography - methods; False Positive Reactions; Female; Fetal Development; Fetal Monitoring - methods; Florida; Gestational Age; Humans; Labor, Obstetric - physiology; Parturition; Pregnancy; Uterine Contraction - physiology; Uterine Monitoring - methods; Young Adult

Objective The aim of this article was to compare clinical interpretation of uterine activity tracings acquired by tocodynamometry and electrohysterography with the gold standard, intrauterine pressure. Study Design Using data from a previous study, subjects who had simultaneous monitoring with all t...