APA (7th ed.) Citation

Euliano, T. Y., Nguyen, M. T., Darmanjian, S., Busowski, J. D., Euliano, N., & Gregg, A. R. (2016). Monitoring Uterine Activity during Labor: Clinician Interpretation of Electrohysterography versus Intrauterine Pressure Catheter and Tocodynamometry. American journal of perinatology, 33(9), 831. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1572425

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Euliano, Tammy Y., Minh Tam Nguyen, Shalom Darmanjian, John D. Busowski, Neil Euliano, and Anthony R. Gregg. "Monitoring Uterine Activity During Labor: Clinician Interpretation of Electrohysterography Versus Intrauterine Pressure Catheter and Tocodynamometry." American Journal of Perinatology 33, no. 9 (2016): 831. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1572425.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Euliano, Tammy Y., et al. "Monitoring Uterine Activity During Labor: Clinician Interpretation of Electrohysterography Versus Intrauterine Pressure Catheter and Tocodynamometry." American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 33, no. 9, 2016, p. 831, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1572425.