Effects of higher‐tier agri‐environment scheme on the abundance of priority farmland birds

Agri‐environment schemes (AES) are the main policy mechanism available for reversing the widespread declines of European farmland biodiversity. We assessed the impact of AES land management on the abundance of bird species whose populations have declined as a consequence of agricultural intensificat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnimal conservation Vol. 21; no. 3; pp. 183 - 192
Main Authors Walker, L. K., Morris, A. J., Cristinacce, A., Dadam, D., Grice, P. V., Peach, W. J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.06.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Agri‐environment schemes (AES) are the main policy mechanism available for reversing the widespread declines of European farmland biodiversity. We assessed the impact of AES land management on the abundance of bird species whose populations have declined as a consequence of agricultural intensification. The AES involved the deployment of a whole‐farm package of wildlife‐friendly land management options covering an average of 7% of the farmed area. The study was conducted across three English regions and focused on species of conservation concern and on a wider suite of farmland birds comprising the UK Government's Farmland Bird Indicator (FBI). Changes in avian abundance on AES farms were compared with those measured across the wider farmed landscape as part of a national bird monitoring scheme. Twelve out of 17 priority species, and the FBI, showed more positive changes in abundance on AES farms in at least one region. Eight species exhibited sustained responses to AES management in at least one region, and eight species exhibited a temporary enhancement in abundance in at least one region. Temporary responses to AES management followed a large scale failure of key AES options to establish during successive wet and cold summers, and involved species known to depend on the habitats provided by these options. In order to offset ongoing declines of FBI species in the wider farmed countryside of 2.3–4.1% per annum, we estimate 26–33% of FBI populations would need to be subject to AES‐type management. This study demonstrates the potential for AES land management to substantially enhance the abundance of priority farmland birds and highlights the need for option packages that are resilient to the impacts of variable weather conditions. This study demonstrates the potential for agri‐environment scheme (AES) land management to substantially enhance the abundance of many priority farmland birds and highlights the need for option packages that are resilient to the impacts of variable weather conditions. We make quantitative predictions concerning the scale of AES deployment needed to halt declines in farmland bird communities at the landscape scale
AbstractList Agri‐environment schemes (AES) are the main policy mechanism available for reversing the widespread declines of European farmland biodiversity. We assessed the impact of AES land management on the abundance of bird species whose populations have declined as a consequence of agricultural intensification. The AES involved the deployment of a whole‐farm package of wildlife‐friendly land management options covering an average of 7% of the farmed area. The study was conducted across three English regions and focused on species of conservation concern and on a wider suite of farmland birds comprising the UK Government's Farmland Bird Indicator (FBI). Changes in avian abundance on AES farms were compared with those measured across the wider farmed landscape as part of a national bird monitoring scheme. Twelve out of 17 priority species, and the FBI, showed more positive changes in abundance on AES farms in at least one region. Eight species exhibited sustained responses to AES management in at least one region, and eight species exhibited a temporary enhancement in abundance in at least one region. Temporary responses to AES management followed a large scale failure of key AES options to establish during successive wet and cold summers, and involved species known to depend on the habitats provided by these options. In order to offset ongoing declines of FBI species in the wider farmed countryside of 2.3–4.1% per annum, we estimate 26–33% of FBI populations would need to be subject to AES‐type management. This study demonstrates the potential for AES land management to substantially enhance the abundance of priority farmland birds and highlights the need for option packages that are resilient to the impacts of variable weather conditions.
Agri‐environment schemes ( AES ) are the main policy mechanism available for reversing the widespread declines of European farmland biodiversity. We assessed the impact of AES land management on the abundance of bird species whose populations have declined as a consequence of agricultural intensification. The AES involved the deployment of a whole‐farm package of wildlife‐friendly land management options covering an average of 7% of the farmed area. The study was conducted across three English regions and focused on species of conservation concern and on a wider suite of farmland birds comprising the UK Government's Farmland Bird Indicator ( FBI ). Changes in avian abundance on AES farms were compared with those measured across the wider farmed landscape as part of a national bird monitoring scheme. Twelve out of 17 priority species, and the FBI , showed more positive changes in abundance on AES farms in at least one region. Eight species exhibited sustained responses to AES management in at least one region, and eight species exhibited a temporary enhancement in abundance in at least one region. Temporary responses to AES management followed a large scale failure of key AES options to establish during successive wet and cold summers, and involved species known to depend on the habitats provided by these options. In order to offset ongoing declines of FBI species in the wider farmed countryside of 2.3–4.1% per annum, we estimate 26–33% of FBI populations would need to be subject to AES ‐type management. This study demonstrates the potential for AES land management to substantially enhance the abundance of priority farmland birds and highlights the need for option packages that are resilient to the impacts of variable weather conditions.
Agri‐environment schemes (AES) are the main policy mechanism available for reversing the widespread declines of European farmland biodiversity. We assessed the impact of AES land management on the abundance of bird species whose populations have declined as a consequence of agricultural intensification. The AES involved the deployment of a whole‐farm package of wildlife‐friendly land management options covering an average of 7% of the farmed area. The study was conducted across three English regions and focused on species of conservation concern and on a wider suite of farmland birds comprising the UK Government's Farmland Bird Indicator (FBI). Changes in avian abundance on AES farms were compared with those measured across the wider farmed landscape as part of a national bird monitoring scheme. Twelve out of 17 priority species, and the FBI, showed more positive changes in abundance on AES farms in at least one region. Eight species exhibited sustained responses to AES management in at least one region, and eight species exhibited a temporary enhancement in abundance in at least one region. Temporary responses to AES management followed a large scale failure of key AES options to establish during successive wet and cold summers, and involved species known to depend on the habitats provided by these options. In order to offset ongoing declines of FBI species in the wider farmed countryside of 2.3–4.1% per annum, we estimate 26–33% of FBI populations would need to be subject to AES‐type management. This study demonstrates the potential for AES land management to substantially enhance the abundance of priority farmland birds and highlights the need for option packages that are resilient to the impacts of variable weather conditions. This study demonstrates the potential for agri‐environment scheme (AES) land management to substantially enhance the abundance of many priority farmland birds and highlights the need for option packages that are resilient to the impacts of variable weather conditions. We make quantitative predictions concerning the scale of AES deployment needed to halt declines in farmland bird communities at the landscape scale
Author Dadam, D.
Walker, L. K.
Grice, P. V.
Morris, A. J.
Cristinacce, A.
Peach, W. J.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: L. K.
  surname: Walker
  fullname: Walker, L. K.
  organization: The Lodge
– sequence: 2
  givenname: A. J.
  surname: Morris
  fullname: Morris, A. J.
  email: tony.morris@rspb.org.uk
  organization: The Lodge
– sequence: 3
  givenname: A.
  surname: Cristinacce
  fullname: Cristinacce, A.
  organization: The Lodge
– sequence: 4
  givenname: D.
  surname: Dadam
  fullname: Dadam, D.
  organization: BTO
– sequence: 5
  givenname: P. V.
  surname: Grice
  fullname: Grice, P. V.
  organization: Natural England
– sequence: 6
  givenname: W. J.
  surname: Peach
  fullname: Peach, W. J.
  organization: The Lodge
BookMark eNp9kE1OHDEQha1okMJPFrmBJTawaMY_3e7u5WgESaSRsgGWWG67zBh122B7QLPjCJwxJ4knkxUS1KZq8b2qV-8IzXzwgNB3Si5oqbnSzxeU8U58QYe0Fn1F276ZlZmLtuprTr6io5QeCKGs4_QQ3V1aCzonHCxeu_s1xD-vb9lBxOo-ujKDf3Yx-Al8xkmvYQIcPM5rwGrYeKO8hp32MboQXd5iq-I0Km_w4KJJJ-jAqjHBt__9GN1cXV4vf1ar3z9-LRerSnNORMV4S01rjTY9s4MSA2e1ahrKbMd6yw0ndUepaA3UBppBs4ELBYYzwSjQBvgxOtvvfYzhaQMpy8klDWNxAmGTJKNkl4DgdUFP36EPYRN9cScZKTfbrmtYoc73lI4hpQhWlg8nFbeSErlLWpak5b-kCzt_x2qXVXbB56jc-JnixY2w_Xi1XCxv94q_fPOTSA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2024_109114
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2020_108510
crossref_primary_10_1111_mec_16421
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10113_022_01878_3
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_4532
crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12428
crossref_primary_10_1080_00063657_2021_1922356
crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12426
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oneear_2023_09_005
crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2023_0215
crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12424
crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12425
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2023_106688
crossref_primary_10_1080_00063657_2024_2392215
crossref_primary_10_1111_csp2_12862
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2019_106619
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2019_109875
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14865
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14246
crossref_primary_10_31545_intagr_168992
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2024_110722
crossref_primary_10_1111_ibi_12650
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_019_05305_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10661_022_10394_0
crossref_primary_10_1111_cobi_13692
crossref_primary_10_3390_d13030134
crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_211671
crossref_primary_10_1111_conl_12904
crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_2720
crossref_primary_10_1002_pan3_10422
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2021_105441
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_13329
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2021_107444
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0216009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2022_115221
crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12540
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_13362
crossref_primary_10_1080_09640568_2024_2364774
crossref_primary_10_1002_pan3_10080
crossref_primary_10_17221_387_2022_AGRICECON
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10113_022_01892_5
crossref_primary_10_3390_land11020301
crossref_primary_10_1111_icad_12578
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14338
crossref_primary_10_1080_00063657_2018_1506736
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0959270919000479
Cites_doi 10.1098/rspb.2010.1923
10.1007/s10336-007-0237-y
10.1080/00063650709461457
10.1111/cobi.12536
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02161.x
10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.021
10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.023
10.1038/nclimate1452
10.1016/j.agee.2010.07.008
10.1016/j.tree.2011.05.009
10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.020
10.1111/1365-2664.12412
10.1111/j.1474-919X.2010.01037.x
10.1002/joc.3370120402
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02166.x
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01958.x
10.1098/rsbl.2010.0228
10.1006/asle.2001.0025
10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00083-0
10.1016/j.agee.2011.11.021
10.1016/j.jnc.2015.02.005
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2018 The Zoological Society of London
Copyright © 2018 The Zoological Society of London
Copyright_xml – notice: 2018 The Zoological Society of London
– notice: Copyright © 2018 The Zoological Society of London
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7SN
7SS
7ST
7U6
8FD
C1K
F1W
FR3
H97
L.G
P64
RC3
7S9
L.6
DOI 10.1111/acv.12386
DatabaseName CrossRef
Ecology Abstracts
Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)
Environment Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Entomology Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Genetics Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Sustainability Science Abstracts
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Ecology Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Entomology Abstracts
CrossRef

AGRICOLA
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Ecology
Agriculture
EISSN 1469-1795
EndPage 192
ExternalDocumentID 10_1111_acv_12386
ACV12386
Genre article
GeographicLocations United Kingdom
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United Kingdom
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Natural England
  funderid: ECM6290
GroupedDBID -~X
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OC
23M
31~
33P
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHBH
AAHQN
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABITZ
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABVKB
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFS
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHBTC
AIDQK
AIDYY
AITYG
AIURR
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
CAG
CHEAL
COF
CS3
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
EYRJQ
F00
F01
F04
FEDTE
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.T
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IX1
J0M
K48
L98
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
ROL
RX1
SUPJJ
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WIH
WIK
WNSPC
WOHZO
WQJ
WXSBR
WYISQ
XG1
ZY4
ZZTAW
~IA
~KM
~WT
AAHHS
AAYXX
ACCFJ
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEQDE
AIWBW
AJBDE
CITATION
RIG
7SN
7SS
7ST
7U6
8FD
C1K
F1W
FR3
H97
L.G
P64
RC3
7S9
L.6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3306-2371d7fdcd92fba6b324a5512f829f3d30481167de4de5bc2b36aed32621e15e3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 1367-9430
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 18:33:53 EDT 2025
Sun Jul 13 04:22:33 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:25:15 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:53:45 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 20 07:26:26 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3306-2371d7fdcd92fba6b324a5512f829f3d30481167de4de5bc2b36aed32621e15e3
Notes Associate Editor: Karl Evans
Editor: Darren Evans
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PQID 2055178852
PQPubID 866372
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2101367634
proquest_journals_2055178852
crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12386
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_acv_12386
wiley_primary_10_1111_acv_12386_ACV12386
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate June 2018
2018-06-00
20180601
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2018
  text: June 2018
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
PublicationTitle Animal conservation
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 2007; 148
2011; 278
2001; 101
2016b
2015; 203
2016a
2011
2010
2015; 52
2008
2015; 108
2013b
2013a
2007; 54
2017; 212
2012; 149
1992; 12
2015; 25
2012; 2
2015; 29
2010; 139
2010; 152
2009; 102
2016
2015
2001; 1
2012; 49
2014
2011; 26
2011; 48
2009; 142
2016c
2005; 16
2010; 6
e_1_2_7_6_1
e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_4_1
Eaton M.A. (e_1_2_7_15_1) 2009; 102
e_1_2_7_9_1
Eaton M.A. (e_1_2_7_16_1) 2015; 108
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_7_1
e_1_2_7_19_1
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_17_1
e_1_2_7_2_1
e_1_2_7_14_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
Alexander L.V. (e_1_2_7_3_1) 2001; 1
e_1_2_7_12_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
e_1_2_7_26_1
e_1_2_7_27_1
e_1_2_7_28_1
e_1_2_7_29_1
Radley G. (e_1_2_7_35_1) 2005; 16
R Development Core Team (e_1_2_7_34_1) 2011
SAS Institute Inc (e_1_2_7_36_1) 2008
e_1_2_7_30_1
e_1_2_7_25_1
e_1_2_7_31_1
e_1_2_7_24_1
e_1_2_7_32_1
e_1_2_7_23_1
e_1_2_7_33_1
e_1_2_7_22_1
e_1_2_7_21_1
e_1_2_7_20_1
e_1_2_7_37_1
e_1_2_7_38_1
References_xml – year: 2011
– year: 2016b
– volume: 48
  start-page: 514
  year: 2011
  end-page: 522
  article-title: Adaptive management and targeting of agri‐environment schemes does benefit biodiversity: a case study of the corn bunting
  publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol.
– volume: 49
  start-page: 871
  year: 2012
  end-page: 882
  article-title: Landscape‐scale responses of birds to agri‐environment management: a test of the English Environmental Stewardship scheme
  publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol.
– volume: 149
  start-page: 74
  year: 2012
  end-page: 79
  article-title: Mixed effectiveness of French agri‐environment schemes for nationwide farmland bird conservation
  publication-title: Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
– volume: 2
  start-page: 491
  year: 2012
  end-page: 496
  article-title: A decade of weather extremes
  publication-title: Nat. Clim. Change
– volume: 25
  start-page: 23
  year: 2015
  end-page: 34
  article-title: Testing bespoke management of foraging habitat for European turtle doves
  publication-title: J. Nat. Conserv.
– volume: 108
  start-page: 708
  year: 2015
  end-page: 746
  article-title: Birds of Conservation Concern 4: the population status of birds in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man
  publication-title: Br. Birds
– volume: 29
  start-page: 1006
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1016
  article-title: The role of agri‐environment schemes in conservation and environmental management
  publication-title: Conserv. Biol.
– volume: 152
  start-page: 530
  year: 2010
  end-page: 542
  article-title: Grey partridge in the UK: recovery status, set‐aside and shooting
  publication-title: Ibis
– volume: 148
  start-page: S295
  year: 2007
  end-page: S303
  article-title: The Swiss agri‐environment scheme promotes farmland birds: but only moderately
  publication-title: J. Ornithol.
– volume: 142
  start-page: 2949
  year: 2009
  end-page: 2953
  article-title: Do meadow birds profit from agri‐environment schemes in Dutch agricultural landscapes?
  publication-title: Biol. Conserv.
– volume: 212
  start-page: 230
  year: 2017
  end-page: 239
  article-title: Agri‐environmental measures and the breeding ecology of a declining farmland bird
  publication-title: Biol. Cons.
– volume: 101
  start-page: 361
  year: 2001
  end-page: 373
  article-title: Countryside stewardship delivers cirl buntings ( ) in Devon, UK
  publication-title: Biol. Conserv.
– volume: 49
  start-page: 883
  year: 2012
  end-page: 891
  article-title: Effects of the proportion and spatial arrangement of un‐cropped landon breeding bird abundance in arable rotations
  publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol.
– year: 2016
– year: 2014
– year: 2010
– year: 2013b
– year: 2016a
– year: 2016c
– volume: 278
  start-page: 1894
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1902
  article-title: Landscape‐moderated biodiversity effects of agri‐environmental management: a meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.
– volume: 52
  start-page: 696
  year: 2015
  end-page: 705
  article-title: Social and ecological drivers of success in agri‐environment schemes: the roles of farmers and environmental context
  publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol.
– year: 2008
– volume: 6
  start-page: 643
  year: 2010
  end-page: 646
  article-title: Field‐level bird abundances are enhanced by landscape‐scale agri‐environment scheme uptake
  publication-title: Biol. Lett.
– volume: 203
  start-page: 69
  year: 2015
  end-page: 79
  article-title: Higher‐tier agri‐environment scheme enhances breeding densities of some priority farmland birds in England
  publication-title: Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
– volume: 54
  start-page: 61
  year: 2007
  end-page: 72
  article-title: Modelling population changes using data from different surveys: the Common Birds Census and the Bredding Birds Survey
  publication-title: Bird Study
– volume: 16
  start-page: 257
  year: 2005
  end-page: 263
  article-title: Environmental Stewardship
  publication-title: Br. Wildl.
– volume: 139
  start-page: 121
  year: 2010
  end-page: 128
  article-title: Regional variation in the efficacy of Entry Level Stewardship in England
  publication-title: Agri. Ecosyt. Environ.
– volume: 1
  start-page: 142
  year: 2001
  end-page: 150
  article-title: UK regional precipitation series: updated precipitation series for the UK and discussion of recent extremes
  publication-title: Atmos. Sci. Lett.
– volume: 102
  start-page: 296
  year: 2009
  end-page: 341
  article-title: Birds of Conservation Concern 3: the population status of birds in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man
  publication-title: Br. Birds
– volume: 12
  start-page: 317
  year: 1992
  end-page: 342
  article-title: A new daily Central England Temperature Series, 1772–1991
  publication-title: Int. J. Climatol.
– year: 2015
– volume: 26
  start-page: 474
  year: 2011
  end-page: 481
  article-title: Does conservation on farmland contribute to halting the biodiversity decline?
  publication-title: Trends Ecol. Evol.
– year: 2013a
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1923
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10336-007-0237-y
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  doi: 10.1080/00063650709461457
– ident: e_1_2_7_37_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  doi: 10.1111/cobi.12536
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02161.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.021
– ident: e_1_2_7_29_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_23_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.023
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1038/nclimate1452
– ident: e_1_2_7_25_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_28_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.07.008
– ident: e_1_2_7_21_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.05.009
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.020
– volume: 16
  start-page: 257
  year: 2005
  ident: e_1_2_7_35_1
  article-title: Environmental Stewardship
  publication-title: Br. Wildl.
– volume-title: R: a language and environment for statistical computing
  year: 2011
  ident: e_1_2_7_34_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_22_1
  doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12412
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2010.01037.x
– volume: 108
  start-page: 708
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  article-title: Birds of Conservation Concern 4: the population status of birds in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man
  publication-title: Br. Birds
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_30_1
  doi: 10.1002/joc.3370120402
– ident: e_1_2_7_38_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02166.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_24_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_27_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_32_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01958.x
– volume-title: SAS/STAT 9.2 user's guide
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_7_36_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0228
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
– volume: 1
  start-page: 142
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  article-title: UK regional precipitation series: updated precipitation series for the UK and discussion of recent extremes
  publication-title: Atmos. Sci. Lett.
  doi: 10.1006/asle.2001.0025
– volume: 102
  start-page: 296
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  article-title: Birds of Conservation Concern 3: the population status of birds in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man
  publication-title: Br. Birds
– ident: e_1_2_7_31_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00083-0
– ident: e_1_2_7_26_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_33_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.11.021
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2015.02.005
SSID ssj0012831
Score 2.4096627
Snippet Agri‐environment schemes (AES) are the main policy mechanism available for reversing the widespread declines of European farmland biodiversity. We assessed the...
Agri‐environment schemes ( AES ) are the main policy mechanism available for reversing the widespread declines of European farmland biodiversity. We assessed...
SourceID proquest
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 183
SubjectTerms Abundance
agri-environmental policy
Agricultural land
Agriculture
Agri‐environment schemes
Biodiversity
Birds
Common Agricultural Policy
Environmental Stewardship Scheme
farmland biodiversity
Farmland Bird Index
farmland birds
Farms
habitats
Higher Level Stewardship
Intensive farming
Land management
Land use planning
landscapes
monitoring
Populations
Rural areas
Species
species abundance
summer
United Kingdom
Weather
Wildlife
Wildlife conservation
Wildlife habitats
Wildlife management
Title Effects of higher‐tier agri‐environment scheme on the abundance of priority farmland birds
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Facv.12386
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2055178852
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2101367634
Volume 21
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LSsQwFA0iCG58i2-iuHDTwaZNH7iSYUQEXYiKC7EkTaKDTju0HUFXfoLf6Jd4b1-OoiDuCr0haZKbnNPce0LIrmBhwIPQAE1VQFCkxy1puMEDR4T8nq05JgqfnnnHl-7JNb-eIAdNLkylD9H-cEPPKNdrdHAh8zEnF_FTB5bdAOW2MVYLAdF5Kx0Fy65T51z5FkqM16pCGMXTlvy6F30CzHGYWu4zR7PkpmlhFV7y0BkVshO_fBNv_OcnzJGZGn_Sw2rCzJMJnSyQqV6pXf28SG4rNeOcpobelyEg769vBWydVNxlfXgeS4yjQIz1QNM0oYAiqZCYVAJzCMsOs36K1-JRI7IBBk9S2c9UvkQuj3oX3WOrvoLBih0gExZzfFv5RsUqZEYKTwL-EgCymAlYaBzloNyM7flKu0pzGTPpeEIrwITM1jbXzjKZTNJErxDKpeuKMIwDExgXeJbgKg6lBP4DpYRiq2SvGYworvXJ8ZqMx6jhKdBdUdldq2SnNR1Wohw_GW00IxrVfplHbB8aD6yfQ3Xb7WvwKDwmEYlOR2BjVzp2jgtNKofv90qiw-5V-bD2d9N1Mg2oK6jizTbIZJGN9CYgm0JulVP4AyL89i8
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1dT9swFL3iQ4i9bIOBYJRhEA-8pCJOnCYSL1VVVKDlAQHihUV2bEPFSFDaThpP-wn7jfySXTsfFLRJiDdLsWXH9rXPse89BtjlNApZGGmkqRIJigiYIzTT5sLRQP7AVcwECg9Og96Ff3zFrmbgoIqFKfQh6gM3Yxl2vTYGbg6kp6ycJz-buO6GwSzMmxe9LaE6q8WjcOH1yqirlmNExktdIePHUxd9uRs9Q8xpoGp3msNPcF21sXAwuWtOxqKZPL6Sb3zvT3yGjyUEJe1izizBjEqXYaFr5at_fYHvhaDxiGSa3FovkKfff8a4exJ-kw8xPRUbR5Abq3tFspQgkCRcmLgSnEam7EM-zMzLeETz_N74TxIxzOVoBS4Ou-ednlO-wuAkHvIJh3otV7a0TGREteCBQAjGEWdRHdJIe9IzijNu0JLKl4qJhAov4EoiLKSucpnyVmEuzVK1BoQJ3-dRlIQ61D5SLc5kEgmBFAhLcUnXYa8ajTgpJcrNSxk_4oqqYHfFtrvWYafO-lDocvwrU6Ma0rg0zVFM97HxSPwZVrddf0ajMjclPFXZBPO4hZSd52OT7Pj9v5K43bm0ia9vz7oFi73zQT_uH52ebMAHBGFh4X7WgLlxPlGbCHTG4pudz38BeDr6Sg
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LTtwwFL2iVFRs-oAiprwM6oJNRsSJM4lYjeahKRSEEFOxQER2bLejdpJRJoPUrviEfiNfwnVeHRBIqLtIsWXHvtc-J773GOAzp4HP_EAjTZVIUITHLKGZNgeOBvJ7tmImUfjk1BsM3aNLdrkAh1UuTKEPUf9wM56Rr9fGwSdSzzk5j26auOz63it47XoHvjHp7nmtHYXrrlMmXbUsozFeygqZMJ666sPN6B_CnMep-UbTfwdXVReL-JKfzVkmmtGfR-qN__kN7-FtCUBJu7CYD7Cg4hVY6uXi1b9X4bqQM56SRJMfeQzI3e3fDPdOwr-nI3yey4wjyIzVWJEkJggjCRcmqwSNyNSdpKPE3ItHNE_HJnqSiFEqpx9h2O9ddAZWeQeDFTnIJizqtGzZ0jKSAdWCewIBGEeURbVPA-1Ix-jN2F5LKlcqJiIqHI8riaCQ2spmylmDxTiJ1ToQJlyXB0Hka1-7SLQ4k1EgBBIgrMUlbcB-NRlhVAqUm3syfoUVUcHhCvPhasBeXXRSqHI8VWizmtGwdMxpSA-w80j7GTa3W79GlzLnJDxWyQzL2IWQneNil_Lpe76RsN35lj98ennRHXhz1u2HX7-cHm_AMiIwv4g924TFLJ2pLUQ5mdjOrfkessb5Ag
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects+of+higher%E2%80%90tier+agri%E2%80%90environment+scheme+on+the+abundance+of+priority+farmland+birds&rft.jtitle=Animal+conservation&rft.au=Walker%2C+L+K&rft.au=Morris%2C+A+J&rft.au=Cristinacce%2C+A&rft.au=Dadam%2C+D&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.issn=1367-9430&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3+p.183-192&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=192&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Facv.12386&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1367-9430&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1367-9430&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1367-9430&client=summon