Effects of higher‐tier agri‐environment scheme on the abundance of priority farmland birds
Agri‐environment schemes (AES) are the main policy mechanism available for reversing the widespread declines of European farmland biodiversity. We assessed the impact of AES land management on the abundance of bird species whose populations have declined as a consequence of agricultural intensificat...
Saved in:
Published in | Animal conservation Vol. 21; no. 3; pp. 183 - 192 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.06.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Agri‐environment schemes (AES) are the main policy mechanism available for reversing the widespread declines of European farmland biodiversity. We assessed the impact of AES land management on the abundance of bird species whose populations have declined as a consequence of agricultural intensification. The AES involved the deployment of a whole‐farm package of wildlife‐friendly land management options covering an average of 7% of the farmed area. The study was conducted across three English regions and focused on species of conservation concern and on a wider suite of farmland birds comprising the UK Government's Farmland Bird Indicator (FBI). Changes in avian abundance on AES farms were compared with those measured across the wider farmed landscape as part of a national bird monitoring scheme. Twelve out of 17 priority species, and the FBI, showed more positive changes in abundance on AES farms in at least one region. Eight species exhibited sustained responses to AES management in at least one region, and eight species exhibited a temporary enhancement in abundance in at least one region. Temporary responses to AES management followed a large scale failure of key AES options to establish during successive wet and cold summers, and involved species known to depend on the habitats provided by these options. In order to offset ongoing declines of FBI species in the wider farmed countryside of 2.3–4.1% per annum, we estimate 26–33% of FBI populations would need to be subject to AES‐type management. This study demonstrates the potential for AES land management to substantially enhance the abundance of priority farmland birds and highlights the need for option packages that are resilient to the impacts of variable weather conditions.
This study demonstrates the potential for agri‐environment scheme (AES) land management to substantially enhance the abundance of many priority farmland birds and highlights the need for option packages that are resilient to the impacts of variable weather conditions. We make quantitative predictions concerning the scale of AES deployment needed to halt declines in farmland bird communities at the landscape scale |
---|---|
AbstractList | Agri‐environment schemes (AES) are the main policy mechanism available for reversing the widespread declines of European farmland biodiversity. We assessed the impact of AES land management on the abundance of bird species whose populations have declined as a consequence of agricultural intensification. The AES involved the deployment of a whole‐farm package of wildlife‐friendly land management options covering an average of 7% of the farmed area. The study was conducted across three English regions and focused on species of conservation concern and on a wider suite of farmland birds comprising the UK Government's Farmland Bird Indicator (FBI). Changes in avian abundance on AES farms were compared with those measured across the wider farmed landscape as part of a national bird monitoring scheme. Twelve out of 17 priority species, and the FBI, showed more positive changes in abundance on AES farms in at least one region. Eight species exhibited sustained responses to AES management in at least one region, and eight species exhibited a temporary enhancement in abundance in at least one region. Temporary responses to AES management followed a large scale failure of key AES options to establish during successive wet and cold summers, and involved species known to depend on the habitats provided by these options. In order to offset ongoing declines of FBI species in the wider farmed countryside of 2.3–4.1% per annum, we estimate 26–33% of FBI populations would need to be subject to AES‐type management. This study demonstrates the potential for AES land management to substantially enhance the abundance of priority farmland birds and highlights the need for option packages that are resilient to the impacts of variable weather conditions. Agri‐environment schemes ( AES ) are the main policy mechanism available for reversing the widespread declines of European farmland biodiversity. We assessed the impact of AES land management on the abundance of bird species whose populations have declined as a consequence of agricultural intensification. The AES involved the deployment of a whole‐farm package of wildlife‐friendly land management options covering an average of 7% of the farmed area. The study was conducted across three English regions and focused on species of conservation concern and on a wider suite of farmland birds comprising the UK Government's Farmland Bird Indicator ( FBI ). Changes in avian abundance on AES farms were compared with those measured across the wider farmed landscape as part of a national bird monitoring scheme. Twelve out of 17 priority species, and the FBI , showed more positive changes in abundance on AES farms in at least one region. Eight species exhibited sustained responses to AES management in at least one region, and eight species exhibited a temporary enhancement in abundance in at least one region. Temporary responses to AES management followed a large scale failure of key AES options to establish during successive wet and cold summers, and involved species known to depend on the habitats provided by these options. In order to offset ongoing declines of FBI species in the wider farmed countryside of 2.3–4.1% per annum, we estimate 26–33% of FBI populations would need to be subject to AES ‐type management. This study demonstrates the potential for AES land management to substantially enhance the abundance of priority farmland birds and highlights the need for option packages that are resilient to the impacts of variable weather conditions. Agri‐environment schemes (AES) are the main policy mechanism available for reversing the widespread declines of European farmland biodiversity. We assessed the impact of AES land management on the abundance of bird species whose populations have declined as a consequence of agricultural intensification. The AES involved the deployment of a whole‐farm package of wildlife‐friendly land management options covering an average of 7% of the farmed area. The study was conducted across three English regions and focused on species of conservation concern and on a wider suite of farmland birds comprising the UK Government's Farmland Bird Indicator (FBI). Changes in avian abundance on AES farms were compared with those measured across the wider farmed landscape as part of a national bird monitoring scheme. Twelve out of 17 priority species, and the FBI, showed more positive changes in abundance on AES farms in at least one region. Eight species exhibited sustained responses to AES management in at least one region, and eight species exhibited a temporary enhancement in abundance in at least one region. Temporary responses to AES management followed a large scale failure of key AES options to establish during successive wet and cold summers, and involved species known to depend on the habitats provided by these options. In order to offset ongoing declines of FBI species in the wider farmed countryside of 2.3–4.1% per annum, we estimate 26–33% of FBI populations would need to be subject to AES‐type management. This study demonstrates the potential for AES land management to substantially enhance the abundance of priority farmland birds and highlights the need for option packages that are resilient to the impacts of variable weather conditions. This study demonstrates the potential for agri‐environment scheme (AES) land management to substantially enhance the abundance of many priority farmland birds and highlights the need for option packages that are resilient to the impacts of variable weather conditions. We make quantitative predictions concerning the scale of AES deployment needed to halt declines in farmland bird communities at the landscape scale |
Author | Dadam, D. Walker, L. K. Grice, P. V. Morris, A. J. Cristinacce, A. Peach, W. J. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: L. K. surname: Walker fullname: Walker, L. K. organization: The Lodge – sequence: 2 givenname: A. J. surname: Morris fullname: Morris, A. J. email: tony.morris@rspb.org.uk organization: The Lodge – sequence: 3 givenname: A. surname: Cristinacce fullname: Cristinacce, A. organization: The Lodge – sequence: 4 givenname: D. surname: Dadam fullname: Dadam, D. organization: BTO – sequence: 5 givenname: P. V. surname: Grice fullname: Grice, P. V. organization: Natural England – sequence: 6 givenname: W. J. surname: Peach fullname: Peach, W. J. organization: The Lodge |
BookMark | eNp9kE1OHDEQha1okMJPFrmBJTawaMY_3e7u5WgESaSRsgGWWG67zBh122B7QLPjCJwxJ4knkxUS1KZq8b2qV-8IzXzwgNB3Si5oqbnSzxeU8U58QYe0Fn1F276ZlZmLtuprTr6io5QeCKGs4_QQ3V1aCzonHCxeu_s1xD-vb9lBxOo-ujKDf3Yx-Al8xkmvYQIcPM5rwGrYeKO8hp32MboQXd5iq-I0Km_w4KJJJ-jAqjHBt__9GN1cXV4vf1ar3z9-LRerSnNORMV4S01rjTY9s4MSA2e1ahrKbMd6yw0ndUepaA3UBppBs4ELBYYzwSjQBvgxOtvvfYzhaQMpy8klDWNxAmGTJKNkl4DgdUFP36EPYRN9cScZKTfbrmtYoc73lI4hpQhWlg8nFbeSErlLWpak5b-kCzt_x2qXVXbB56jc-JnixY2w_Xi1XCxv94q_fPOTSA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2024_109114 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2020_108510 crossref_primary_10_1111_mec_16421 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10113_022_01878_3 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_4532 crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12428 crossref_primary_10_1080_00063657_2021_1922356 crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12426 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oneear_2023_09_005 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2023_0215 crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12424 crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12425 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2023_106688 crossref_primary_10_1080_00063657_2024_2392215 crossref_primary_10_1111_csp2_12862 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2019_106619 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2019_109875 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14865 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14246 crossref_primary_10_31545_intagr_168992 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2024_110722 crossref_primary_10_1111_ibi_12650 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_019_05305_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10661_022_10394_0 crossref_primary_10_1111_cobi_13692 crossref_primary_10_3390_d13030134 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsos_211671 crossref_primary_10_1111_conl_12904 crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_2720 crossref_primary_10_1002_pan3_10422 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2021_105441 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_13329 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2021_107444 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0216009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2022_115221 crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12540 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_13362 crossref_primary_10_1080_09640568_2024_2364774 crossref_primary_10_1002_pan3_10080 crossref_primary_10_17221_387_2022_AGRICECON crossref_primary_10_1007_s10113_022_01892_5 crossref_primary_10_3390_land11020301 crossref_primary_10_1111_icad_12578 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_14338 crossref_primary_10_1080_00063657_2018_1506736 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0959270919000479 |
Cites_doi | 10.1098/rspb.2010.1923 10.1007/s10336-007-0237-y 10.1080/00063650709461457 10.1111/cobi.12536 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02161.x 10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.021 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.023 10.1038/nclimate1452 10.1016/j.agee.2010.07.008 10.1016/j.tree.2011.05.009 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.020 10.1111/1365-2664.12412 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2010.01037.x 10.1002/joc.3370120402 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02166.x 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01958.x 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0228 10.1006/asle.2001.0025 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00083-0 10.1016/j.agee.2011.11.021 10.1016/j.jnc.2015.02.005 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2018 The Zoological Society of London Copyright © 2018 The Zoological Society of London |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2018 The Zoological Society of London – notice: Copyright © 2018 The Zoological Society of London |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7SN 7SS 7ST 7U6 8FD C1K F1W FR3 H97 L.G P64 RC3 7S9 L.6 |
DOI | 10.1111/acv.12386 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Engineering Research Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Entomology Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Genetics Abstracts Technology Research Database Sustainability Science Abstracts ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Environment Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Entomology Abstracts CrossRef AGRICOLA |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Ecology Agriculture |
EISSN | 1469-1795 |
EndPage | 192 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1111_acv_12386 ACV12386 |
Genre | article |
GeographicLocations | United Kingdom |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United Kingdom |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Natural England funderid: ECM6290 |
GroupedDBID | -~X .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OC 23M 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHBH AAHQN AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABITZ ABJNI ABPVW ABVKB ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AIDQK AIDYY AITYG AIURR AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 CAG CHEAL COF CS3 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM EBS ECGQY EJD EYRJQ F00 F01 F04 FEDTE G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IX1 J0M K48 L98 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG P2P P2W P2X P4D Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SUPJJ UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WIH WIK WNSPC WOHZO WQJ WXSBR WYISQ XG1 ZY4 ZZTAW ~IA ~KM ~WT AAHHS AAYXX ACCFJ ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AIWBW AJBDE CITATION RIG 7SN 7SS 7ST 7U6 8FD C1K F1W FR3 H97 L.G P64 RC3 7S9 L.6 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3306-2371d7fdcd92fba6b324a5512f829f3d30481167de4de5bc2b36aed32621e15e3 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 1367-9430 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 18:33:53 EDT 2025 Sun Jul 13 04:22:33 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:25:15 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:45 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 20 07:26:26 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3306-2371d7fdcd92fba6b324a5512f829f3d30481167de4de5bc2b36aed32621e15e3 |
Notes | Associate Editor: Karl Evans Editor: Darren Evans ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
PQID | 2055178852 |
PQPubID | 866372 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2101367634 proquest_journals_2055178852 crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12386 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_acv_12386 wiley_primary_10_1111_acv_12386_ACV12386 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | June 2018 2018-06-00 20180601 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2018 text: June 2018 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Animal conservation |
PublicationYear | 2018 |
Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | 2007; 148 2011; 278 2001; 101 2016b 2015; 203 2016a 2011 2010 2015; 52 2008 2015; 108 2013b 2013a 2007; 54 2017; 212 2012; 149 1992; 12 2015; 25 2012; 2 2015; 29 2010; 139 2010; 152 2009; 102 2016 2015 2001; 1 2012; 49 2014 2011; 26 2011; 48 2009; 142 2016c 2005; 16 2010; 6 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 Eaton M.A. (e_1_2_7_15_1) 2009; 102 e_1_2_7_9_1 Eaton M.A. (e_1_2_7_16_1) 2015; 108 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 Alexander L.V. (e_1_2_7_3_1) 2001; 1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 e_1_2_7_27_1 e_1_2_7_28_1 e_1_2_7_29_1 Radley G. (e_1_2_7_35_1) 2005; 16 R Development Core Team (e_1_2_7_34_1) 2011 SAS Institute Inc (e_1_2_7_36_1) 2008 e_1_2_7_30_1 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_31_1 e_1_2_7_24_1 e_1_2_7_32_1 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_33_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 e_1_2_7_37_1 e_1_2_7_38_1 |
References_xml | – year: 2011 – year: 2016b – volume: 48 start-page: 514 year: 2011 end-page: 522 article-title: Adaptive management and targeting of agri‐environment schemes does benefit biodiversity: a case study of the corn bunting publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol. – volume: 49 start-page: 871 year: 2012 end-page: 882 article-title: Landscape‐scale responses of birds to agri‐environment management: a test of the English Environmental Stewardship scheme publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol. – volume: 149 start-page: 74 year: 2012 end-page: 79 article-title: Mixed effectiveness of French agri‐environment schemes for nationwide farmland bird conservation publication-title: Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. – volume: 2 start-page: 491 year: 2012 end-page: 496 article-title: A decade of weather extremes publication-title: Nat. Clim. Change – volume: 25 start-page: 23 year: 2015 end-page: 34 article-title: Testing bespoke management of foraging habitat for European turtle doves publication-title: J. Nat. Conserv. – volume: 108 start-page: 708 year: 2015 end-page: 746 article-title: Birds of Conservation Concern 4: the population status of birds in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man publication-title: Br. Birds – volume: 29 start-page: 1006 year: 2015 end-page: 1016 article-title: The role of agri‐environment schemes in conservation and environmental management publication-title: Conserv. Biol. – volume: 152 start-page: 530 year: 2010 end-page: 542 article-title: Grey partridge in the UK: recovery status, set‐aside and shooting publication-title: Ibis – volume: 148 start-page: S295 year: 2007 end-page: S303 article-title: The Swiss agri‐environment scheme promotes farmland birds: but only moderately publication-title: J. Ornithol. – volume: 142 start-page: 2949 year: 2009 end-page: 2953 article-title: Do meadow birds profit from agri‐environment schemes in Dutch agricultural landscapes? publication-title: Biol. Conserv. – volume: 212 start-page: 230 year: 2017 end-page: 239 article-title: Agri‐environmental measures and the breeding ecology of a declining farmland bird publication-title: Biol. Cons. – volume: 101 start-page: 361 year: 2001 end-page: 373 article-title: Countryside stewardship delivers cirl buntings ( ) in Devon, UK publication-title: Biol. Conserv. – volume: 49 start-page: 883 year: 2012 end-page: 891 article-title: Effects of the proportion and spatial arrangement of un‐cropped landon breeding bird abundance in arable rotations publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol. – year: 2016 – year: 2014 – year: 2010 – year: 2013b – year: 2016a – year: 2016c – volume: 278 start-page: 1894 year: 2011 end-page: 1902 article-title: Landscape‐moderated biodiversity effects of agri‐environmental management: a meta‐analysis publication-title: Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. – volume: 52 start-page: 696 year: 2015 end-page: 705 article-title: Social and ecological drivers of success in agri‐environment schemes: the roles of farmers and environmental context publication-title: J. Appl. Ecol. – year: 2008 – volume: 6 start-page: 643 year: 2010 end-page: 646 article-title: Field‐level bird abundances are enhanced by landscape‐scale agri‐environment scheme uptake publication-title: Biol. Lett. – volume: 203 start-page: 69 year: 2015 end-page: 79 article-title: Higher‐tier agri‐environment scheme enhances breeding densities of some priority farmland birds in England publication-title: Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. – volume: 54 start-page: 61 year: 2007 end-page: 72 article-title: Modelling population changes using data from different surveys: the Common Birds Census and the Bredding Birds Survey publication-title: Bird Study – volume: 16 start-page: 257 year: 2005 end-page: 263 article-title: Environmental Stewardship publication-title: Br. Wildl. – volume: 139 start-page: 121 year: 2010 end-page: 128 article-title: Regional variation in the efficacy of Entry Level Stewardship in England publication-title: Agri. Ecosyt. Environ. – volume: 1 start-page: 142 year: 2001 end-page: 150 article-title: UK regional precipitation series: updated precipitation series for the UK and discussion of recent extremes publication-title: Atmos. Sci. Lett. – volume: 102 start-page: 296 year: 2009 end-page: 341 article-title: Birds of Conservation Concern 3: the population status of birds in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man publication-title: Br. Birds – volume: 12 start-page: 317 year: 1992 end-page: 342 article-title: A new daily Central England Temperature Series, 1772–1991 publication-title: Int. J. Climatol. – year: 2015 – volume: 26 start-page: 474 year: 2011 end-page: 481 article-title: Does conservation on farmland contribute to halting the biodiversity decline? publication-title: Trends Ecol. Evol. – year: 2013a – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1923 – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1007/s10336-007-0237-y – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1080/00063650709461457 – ident: e_1_2_7_37_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1111/cobi.12536 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02161.x – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.021 – ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.023 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1038/nclimate1452 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.07.008 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.05.009 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.020 – volume: 16 start-page: 257 year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 article-title: Environmental Stewardship publication-title: Br. Wildl. – volume-title: R: a language and environment for statistical computing year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12412 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2010.01037.x – volume: 108 start-page: 708 year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 article-title: Birds of Conservation Concern 4: the population status of birds in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man publication-title: Br. Birds – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 doi: 10.1002/joc.3370120402 – ident: e_1_2_7_38_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02166.x – ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01958.x – volume-title: SAS/STAT 9.2 user's guide year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_7_36_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0228 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 – volume: 1 start-page: 142 year: 2001 ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 article-title: UK regional precipitation series: updated precipitation series for the UK and discussion of recent extremes publication-title: Atmos. Sci. Lett. doi: 10.1006/asle.2001.0025 – volume: 102 start-page: 296 year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 article-title: Birds of Conservation Concern 3: the population status of birds in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man publication-title: Br. Birds – ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00083-0 – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.11.021 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2015.02.005 |
SSID | ssj0012831 |
Score | 2.4096627 |
Snippet | Agri‐environment schemes (AES) are the main policy mechanism available for reversing the widespread declines of European farmland biodiversity. We assessed the... Agri‐environment schemes ( AES ) are the main policy mechanism available for reversing the widespread declines of European farmland biodiversity. We assessed... |
SourceID | proquest crossref wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 183 |
SubjectTerms | Abundance agri-environmental policy Agricultural land Agriculture Agri‐environment schemes Biodiversity Birds Common Agricultural Policy Environmental Stewardship Scheme farmland biodiversity Farmland Bird Index farmland birds Farms habitats Higher Level Stewardship Intensive farming Land management Land use planning landscapes monitoring Populations Rural areas Species species abundance summer United Kingdom Weather Wildlife Wildlife conservation Wildlife habitats Wildlife management |
Title | Effects of higher‐tier agri‐environment scheme on the abundance of priority farmland birds |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Facv.12386 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2055178852 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2101367634 |
Volume | 21 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LSsQwFA0iCG58i2-iuHDTwaZNH7iSYUQEXYiKC7EkTaKDTju0HUFXfoLf6Jd4b1-OoiDuCr0haZKbnNPce0LIrmBhwIPQAE1VQFCkxy1puMEDR4T8nq05JgqfnnnHl-7JNb-eIAdNLkylD9H-cEPPKNdrdHAh8zEnF_FTB5bdAOW2MVYLAdF5Kx0Fy65T51z5FkqM16pCGMXTlvy6F30CzHGYWu4zR7PkpmlhFV7y0BkVshO_fBNv_OcnzJGZGn_Sw2rCzJMJnSyQqV6pXf28SG4rNeOcpobelyEg769vBWydVNxlfXgeS4yjQIz1QNM0oYAiqZCYVAJzCMsOs36K1-JRI7IBBk9S2c9UvkQuj3oX3WOrvoLBih0gExZzfFv5RsUqZEYKTwL-EgCymAlYaBzloNyM7flKu0pzGTPpeEIrwITM1jbXzjKZTNJErxDKpeuKMIwDExgXeJbgKg6lBP4DpYRiq2SvGYworvXJ8ZqMx6jhKdBdUdldq2SnNR1Wohw_GW00IxrVfplHbB8aD6yfQ3Xb7WvwKDwmEYlOR2BjVzp2jgtNKofv90qiw-5V-bD2d9N1Mg2oK6jizTbIZJGN9CYgm0JulVP4AyL89i8 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1dT9swFL3iQ4i9bIOBYJRhEA-8pCJOnCYSL1VVVKDlAQHihUV2bEPFSFDaThpP-wn7jfySXTsfFLRJiDdLsWXH9rXPse89BtjlNApZGGmkqRIJigiYIzTT5sLRQP7AVcwECg9Og96Ff3zFrmbgoIqFKfQh6gM3Yxl2vTYGbg6kp6ycJz-buO6GwSzMmxe9LaE6q8WjcOH1yqirlmNExktdIePHUxd9uRs9Q8xpoGp3msNPcF21sXAwuWtOxqKZPL6Sb3zvT3yGjyUEJe1izizBjEqXYaFr5at_fYHvhaDxiGSa3FovkKfff8a4exJ-kw8xPRUbR5Abq3tFspQgkCRcmLgSnEam7EM-zMzLeETz_N74TxIxzOVoBS4Ou-ednlO-wuAkHvIJh3otV7a0TGREteCBQAjGEWdRHdJIe9IzijNu0JLKl4qJhAov4EoiLKSucpnyVmEuzVK1BoQJ3-dRlIQ61D5SLc5kEgmBFAhLcUnXYa8ajTgpJcrNSxk_4oqqYHfFtrvWYafO-lDocvwrU6Ma0rg0zVFM97HxSPwZVrddf0ajMjclPFXZBPO4hZSd52OT7Pj9v5K43bm0ia9vz7oFi73zQT_uH52ebMAHBGFh4X7WgLlxPlGbCHTG4pudz38BeDr6Sg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LTtwwFL2iVFRs-oAiprwM6oJNRsSJM4lYjeahKRSEEFOxQER2bLejdpJRJoPUrviEfiNfwnVeHRBIqLtIsWXHvtc-J773GOAzp4HP_EAjTZVIUITHLKGZNgeOBvJ7tmImUfjk1BsM3aNLdrkAh1UuTKEPUf9wM56Rr9fGwSdSzzk5j26auOz63it47XoHvjHp7nmtHYXrrlMmXbUsozFeygqZMJ666sPN6B_CnMep-UbTfwdXVReL-JKfzVkmmtGfR-qN__kN7-FtCUBJu7CYD7Cg4hVY6uXi1b9X4bqQM56SRJMfeQzI3e3fDPdOwr-nI3yey4wjyIzVWJEkJggjCRcmqwSNyNSdpKPE3ItHNE_HJnqSiFEqpx9h2O9ddAZWeQeDFTnIJizqtGzZ0jKSAdWCewIBGEeURbVPA-1Ix-jN2F5LKlcqJiIqHI8riaCQ2spmylmDxTiJ1ToQJlyXB0Hka1-7SLQ4k1EgBBIgrMUlbcB-NRlhVAqUm3syfoUVUcHhCvPhasBeXXRSqHI8VWizmtGwdMxpSA-w80j7GTa3W79GlzLnJDxWyQzL2IWQneNil_Lpe76RsN35lj98ennRHXhz1u2HX7-cHm_AMiIwv4g924TFLJ2pLUQ5mdjOrfkessb5Ag |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects+of+higher%E2%80%90tier+agri%E2%80%90environment+scheme+on+the+abundance+of+priority+farmland+birds&rft.jtitle=Animal+conservation&rft.au=Walker%2C+L+K&rft.au=Morris%2C+A+J&rft.au=Cristinacce%2C+A&rft.au=Dadam%2C+D&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.issn=1367-9430&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3+p.183-192&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=192&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Facv.12386&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1367-9430&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1367-9430&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1367-9430&client=summon |