The resistance and short‐term resilience of a restored extracted peatland ecosystems post‐fire: an opportunistic study after a wildfire

• Published in: Restoration ecology Vol. 30; no. 4
• Main Authors: Blier‐Langdeau, Ariane, Guêné‐Nanchen, Mélina, Hugron, Sandrine, Rochefort, Line
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Malden, USA Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01.04.2022; Blackwell Publishing Ltd
• Subjects: Aquatic plants; bog; Bogs; Bryophyta; capillarity; Carpets; ecological restoration; Eriophorum vaginatum; Evaluation; fire; Fire resistance; Fires; Growing season; growth habit; humidity; lawns and turf; Mosses; peatland; Peatlands; Plant communities; Reintroduction; Resilience; resistance; Restoration; Scirpus cyperinus; Species; Sphagnum; vegetation; Wildfires
• DOI: 10.1111/rec.13545
• ISSN: 1061-2971

Bogs are known to be relatively resistant and resilient to fire, due to the dominance of wet Sphagnum mosses. Indeed, Sphagnum mosses by holding water, ensure bog resistance, and by regenerating from any fragments left post‐fire, ensure bog resilience. The return of several ecological attributes has been reported in the literature post‐restoration. However, the resistance and resilience have not yet been evaluated in restored peatlands. A fire affecting an extracted peatland restored 10 years ago provided the opportunity to (1) evaluate the losses post‐fire, in terms of phytobiomass and plant cover and (2) assess early vegetation recovery after one growing season post‐fire. The fire response of the restored peatland, in terms of resistance and short‐term resilience, differed between the main plant communities. Sphagnum Lawn communities (Sphagnum species from the Acutifolia subgenus and Eriophorum vaginatum) showed greater resistance to fire losing proportionally less phytobiomass (17%) than Wet Hollow communities (44%) (Sphagnum species from the Cuspidata subgenus and Scirpus cyperinus). Greater resistance of the Sphagnum Lawn likely comes from the Acutifolia Sphagnum species growing in dense carpets with good water retention, along with the E. vaginatum tussocks being able to retain humidity below the tussocks, whereas the looser growth habit of Cuspidata Sphagnum species do not have good capillary rise capacity and Scirpus produced litter that can produce a good fuel. This study reinforces the idea that a peatland restoration approach using reintroduction material dominated by Acutifolia Sphagnum species and tussock cottongrass provides a better resistance and short‐term resilience of restored peatlands.