Final Analysis of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance Trial
Purpose:This study aimed to assess the medium-term oncologic outcomes of an active surveillance protocol, replacing confirmatory biopsy with serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.Materials and Methods:A total of 172 men were enrolled in this single-arm prospective trial. Men with prostat...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of urology Vol. 208; no. 5; pp. 1028 - 1036 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Philadelphia, PA
Wolters Kluwer
01.11.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose:This study aimed to assess the medium-term oncologic outcomes of an active surveillance protocol, replacing confirmatory biopsy with serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.Materials and Methods:A total of 172 men were enrolled in this single-arm prospective trial. Men with prostate cancer (Gleason 3+3=6 or Gleason 3+4=7 with ≤10% Gleason pattern 4 overall and <2 cores Gleason pattern 4) eligible for surveillance were included in the study. Men underwent baseline multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and template ± targeted biopsy, then multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging at years 1 and 2 with a 3-year end-of-protocol biopsy. Biopsies during the 3-year protocol period were triggered by abnormalities on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and/or increases in prostate specific antigen density (>0.2 ng/ml/cc).Results:The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect progression to clinically significant prostate cancer were 57% (95% CI 39%-74%), 82% (95% CI 74%-89%), 50% (95% CI 38%-62%), and 86% (95% CI 81%-90%), respectively. Both multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and prostate specific antigen density were significant predictors for progression (multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging OR 6.20, 95% CI 2.72-14.16, P < .001; prostate specific antigen density OR 6.19, 95% CI 2.14-17.92, P = .001). Only 2.3% (4/172) of patients had false-negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and high-risk pathological features (pT3 or high-volume International Society of Urological Pathology >2). After a median 69 months (Q1-Q3 56-79) follow-up of all patients in the cohort, freedom from biochemical recurrence, metastasis, and prostate cancer-related death were 99.3%, 100%, and 100%, respectively.Conclusions:Final analysis of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance trial indicates that there is minimal risk to omitting 1-year confirmatory biopsy during active surveillance if baseline magnetic resonance-targeted + saturation template biopsy was performed; however, standardized 3-year systematic biopsy should be performed due to occasional magnetic resonance imaging-invisible tumors. |
---|---|
AbstractList | This study aimed to assess the medium-term oncologic outcomes of an active surveillance protocol, replacing confirmatory biopsy with serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.PURPOSEThis study aimed to assess the medium-term oncologic outcomes of an active surveillance protocol, replacing confirmatory biopsy with serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.A total of 172 men were enrolled in this single-arm prospective trial. Men with prostate cancer (Gleason 3+3=6 or Gleason 3+4=7 with ≤10% Gleason pattern 4 overall and <2 cores Gleason pattern 4) eligible for surveillance were included in the study. Men underwent baseline multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and template ± targeted biopsy, then multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging at years 1 and 2 with a 3-year end-of-protocol biopsy. Biopsies during the 3-year protocol period were triggered by abnormalities on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and/or increases in prostate specific antigen density (>0.2 ng/ml/cc).MATERIALS AND METHODSA total of 172 men were enrolled in this single-arm prospective trial. Men with prostate cancer (Gleason 3+3=6 or Gleason 3+4=7 with ≤10% Gleason pattern 4 overall and <2 cores Gleason pattern 4) eligible for surveillance were included in the study. Men underwent baseline multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and template ± targeted biopsy, then multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging at years 1 and 2 with a 3-year end-of-protocol biopsy. Biopsies during the 3-year protocol period were triggered by abnormalities on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and/or increases in prostate specific antigen density (>0.2 ng/ml/cc).The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect progression to clinically significant prostate cancer were 57% (95% CI 39%-74%), 82% (95% CI 74%-89%), 50% (95% CI 38%-62%), and 86% (95% CI 81%-90%), respectively. Both multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and prostate specific antigen density were significant predictors for progression (multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging OR 6.20, 95% CI 2.72-14.16, P < .001; prostate specific antigen density OR 6.19, 95% CI 2.14-17.92, P = .001). Only 2.3% (4/172) of patients had false-negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and high-risk pathological features (pT3 or high-volume International Society of Urological Pathology >2). After a median 69 months (Q1-Q3 56-79) follow-up of all patients in the cohort, freedom from biochemical recurrence, metastasis, and prostate cancer-related death were 99.3%, 100%, and 100%, respectively.RESULTSThe sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect progression to clinically significant prostate cancer were 57% (95% CI 39%-74%), 82% (95% CI 74%-89%), 50% (95% CI 38%-62%), and 86% (95% CI 81%-90%), respectively. Both multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and prostate specific antigen density were significant predictors for progression (multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging OR 6.20, 95% CI 2.72-14.16, P < .001; prostate specific antigen density OR 6.19, 95% CI 2.14-17.92, P = .001). Only 2.3% (4/172) of patients had false-negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and high-risk pathological features (pT3 or high-volume International Society of Urological Pathology >2). After a median 69 months (Q1-Q3 56-79) follow-up of all patients in the cohort, freedom from biochemical recurrence, metastasis, and prostate cancer-related death were 99.3%, 100%, and 100%, respectively.Final analysis of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance trial indicates that there is minimal risk to omitting 1-year confirmatory biopsy during active surveillance if baseline magnetic resonance-targeted + saturation template biopsy was performed; however, standardized 3-year systematic biopsy should be performed due to occasional magnetic resonance imaging-invisible tumors.CONCLUSIONSFinal analysis of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance trial indicates that there is minimal risk to omitting 1-year confirmatory biopsy during active surveillance if baseline magnetic resonance-targeted + saturation template biopsy was performed; however, standardized 3-year systematic biopsy should be performed due to occasional magnetic resonance imaging-invisible tumors. Purpose:This study aimed to assess the medium-term oncologic outcomes of an active surveillance protocol, replacing confirmatory biopsy with serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.Materials and Methods:A total of 172 men were enrolled in this single-arm prospective trial. Men with prostate cancer (Gleason 3+3=6 or Gleason 3+4=7 with ≤10% Gleason pattern 4 overall and <2 cores Gleason pattern 4) eligible for surveillance were included in the study. Men underwent baseline multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and template ± targeted biopsy, then multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging at years 1 and 2 with a 3-year end-of-protocol biopsy. Biopsies during the 3-year protocol period were triggered by abnormalities on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and/or increases in prostate specific antigen density (>0.2 ng/ml/cc).Results:The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect progression to clinically significant prostate cancer were 57% (95% CI 39%-74%), 82% (95% CI 74%-89%), 50% (95% CI 38%-62%), and 86% (95% CI 81%-90%), respectively. Both multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and prostate specific antigen density were significant predictors for progression (multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging OR 6.20, 95% CI 2.72-14.16, P < .001; prostate specific antigen density OR 6.19, 95% CI 2.14-17.92, P = .001). Only 2.3% (4/172) of patients had false-negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and high-risk pathological features (pT3 or high-volume International Society of Urological Pathology >2). After a median 69 months (Q1-Q3 56-79) follow-up of all patients in the cohort, freedom from biochemical recurrence, metastasis, and prostate cancer-related death were 99.3%, 100%, and 100%, respectively.Conclusions:Final analysis of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance trial indicates that there is minimal risk to omitting 1-year confirmatory biopsy during active surveillance if baseline magnetic resonance-targeted + saturation template biopsy was performed; however, standardized 3-year systematic biopsy should be performed due to occasional magnetic resonance imaging-invisible tumors. |
Author | Moses, Daniel Yuen, Carlo van Leeuwen, Pim J. Geboers, Bart Delprado, Warick Brenner, Phillip Scheltema, Matthijs J. Thompson, James Haynes, Anne Maree Matthews, Jayne Amin, Amer Stricker, Phillip Shnier, Ron O'Neill, Gordon Gondoputro, William Doan, Paul |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Paul orcidid: 0000-0003-4946-7982 surname: Doan fullname: Doan, Paul email: paul.doan@live.com organization: , – sequence: 2 givenname: Matthijs J. surname: Scheltema fullname: Scheltema, Matthijs J. email: matthijsscheltema@hotmail.com organization: , – sequence: 3 givenname: Amer surname: Amin fullname: Amin, Amer email: amer_amin22@hotmail.com organization: , – sequence: 4 givenname: Ron surname: Shnier fullname: Shnier, Ron email: ron.shnier@i-med.com.au organization: , – sequence: 5 givenname: Bart surname: Geboers fullname: Geboers, Bart email: b.geboers@garvan.org.au organization: , – sequence: 6 givenname: William surname: Gondoputro fullname: Gondoputro, William email: wgondoputro@gmail.com organization: , – sequence: 7 givenname: Daniel surname: Moses fullname: Moses, Daniel organization: , – sequence: 8 givenname: Pim J. surname: van Leeuwen fullname: van Leeuwen, Pim J. email: pj.v.leeuwen@nki.nl organization: , – sequence: 9 givenname: Anne Maree surname: Haynes fullname: Haynes, Anne Maree email: a.haynes@garvan.org.au organization: , – sequence: 10 givenname: Jayne surname: Matthews fullname: Matthews, Jayne email: jmatthews@stvincents.com.au organization: , – sequence: 11 givenname: Phillip surname: Brenner fullname: Brenner, Phillip email: phillip.brenner@gmail.com organization: , – sequence: 12 givenname: Gordon surname: O'Neill fullname: O'Neill, Gordon email: goneill63@gmail.com organization: , – sequence: 13 givenname: Carlo surname: Yuen fullname: Yuen, Carlo email: carloyuen@hotmail.com organization: , – sequence: 14 givenname: Warick surname: Delprado fullname: Delprado, Warick email: wdelprado@dhm.com.au organization: , – sequence: 15 givenname: Phillip surname: Stricker fullname: Stricker, Phillip email: phillip@stricker.com.au organization: , – sequence: 16 givenname: James surname: Thompson fullname: Thompson, James email: drjethompson@gmail.com organization: , |
BookMark | eNqFkEFPAjEQhRuDiYj-Ai89elnsttvt7pEQUQjEROG86XZnoVq62BYI_95FPBgOOoeZZOZ9k5d3jTq2sYDQXUz6McnFw2TRJ7-KZhm_QN2YUxExkdMO6rZLGnGWiCt07f07IXHCBe2i2UhbafCgbQevPW5qHFaAZ3JpIWiFX8E3VloFeLyWS22XWFs8UEHvAL9t3Q60Md_nudPS3KDLWhoPtz-zhxajx_nwOZq-PI2Hg2mkGCM8kqyCRFa85qA4VapUqrVTE86yNE3qTJGcVpwCL0uRAonTKimTtCqTuixjGuesh-5Pfzeu-dyCD8VaewVHK9BsfUEFISlrUzhK2UmqXOO9g7rYOL2W7lDEpDiGV0wWxXl4LZWfUUoHGXRjg5Pa_MOKE7tvTADnP8x2D65YgTRh9Sf5BSTuhek |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euros_2023_10_005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_024_10863_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2023_07_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2024_05_021 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euo_2024_07_003 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1097/JU.0000000000002885 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1527-3792 |
EndPage | 1036 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1097_JU_0000000000002885 JU-22-338 |
Genre | research-article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K .55 .GJ .XZ 08P 0R~ 123 1B1 1CY 354 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 4Q1 4Q2 4Q3 53G 5RE 5VS 7-5 AAAAV AAEDT AAEDW AAGIX AAHPQ AAIQE AAJCS AAKAS AALRI AAMOA AAQFI AAQKA AAQQT AAQXK AASCR AASXQ AAXUO ABASU ABCQX ABDIG ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABOCM ABPPZ ABVCZ ABWVN ABXYN ABZZY ACGFS ACILI ACLDA ACOAL ACRPL ACXJB ACZKN ADGGA ADHPY ADMUD ADNKB ADNMO ADZCM AEBDS AEETU AENEX AFBFQ AFDTB AFEXH AFFNX AFNMH AFTRI AFUWQ AGHFR AGQPQ AHOMT AHQNM AHQVU AHRYX AHVBC AI. AINUH AITUG AIZYK AJCLO AJIOK AJNWD AJZMW AKCTQ AKULP ALKUP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AMRAJ AOQMC ASGHL ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BCGUY BELOY BYPQX C45 C5W CS3 DIWNM DU5 EBS EEVPB EJD ERAAH EX3 F5P FCALG FDB FEDTE FGOYB GBLVA GNXGY GQDEL HLJTE HVGLF HZ~ H~9 IH2 IHE IKREB IKYAY IPNFZ J5H KMI L7B M41 MJL MO0 N4W NQ- NTWIH O9- OAG OAH OB3 OBH ODMTH OGROG OHH OL1 OVD OWU OWV OWW OWY OWZ P2P QTD R2- RIG RLZ ROL RPZ SEL SES SJN SSZ TEORI TSPGW UDS UNMZH UV1 VH1 VVN WOW X7M XH2 XYM YFH YOC ZCG ZFV ZGI ZXP ZY1 ZZMQN AAYXX ABPXF ACVFH ADCNI ADGHP AIGII CITATION 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3305-a3de4ad5f5ec52ccbcc145f0538664f8c092d52e5bb76e016d4b46db4fbb12193 |
ISSN | 0022-5347 1527-3792 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 22:17:02 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:16:07 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:09:36 EDT 2025 Wed Apr 16 02:22:30 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Keywords | magnetic resonance imaging prostate neoplasms watchful waiting |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3305-a3de4ad5f5ec52ccbcc145f0538664f8c092d52e5bb76e016d4b46db4fbb12193 |
Notes | Correspondence: Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St., Darlinghurst, New South Wales 2010, Australia telephone: +61 423 590 547; email: paul.doan@live.comSubmitted February 20, 2022; accepted July 18, 2022; published August 10, 2022.Support: Supported by the Cancer Institute of New South Wales, the Ramsay Foundation, and St. Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre (PND).Conflict of Interest: The Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.Ethics Statement: Study received Institutional Review Board approval (IRB No. HREC/13/SVH/248).Clinical Trial Registration No.: ACTRN12622000080729.†Co-senior authors. ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-4946-7982 |
PQID | 2700638859 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2700638859 crossref_primary_10_1097_JU_0000000000002885 crossref_citationtrail_10_1097_JU_0000000000002885 wolterskluwer_health_10_1097_JU_0000000000002885 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2022-November 2022-11-00 20221101 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2022 text: 2022-November |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Philadelphia, PA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Philadelphia, PA |
PublicationTitle | The Journal of urology |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wolters Kluwer |
References | Chan, Tan, Asif (R28) 2021; 13 Elkjær, Andersen, Høyer, Pedersen, Borre (R20) 2018; 52 Hsiang, Ghabili, Syed (R26) 2021; 7 Roobol (R7) 2021; 10 Chesnut, Vertosick, Benfante (R22) 2020; 77 Osses, Drost, Verbeek (R24) 2020; 126 Dieffenbacher, Nyarangi-Dix, Giganti (R25) 2021; 7 Kasivisvanathan, Emberton, Moore (R10) 2018; 379 Rajwa, Pradere, Quhal (R15) 2021; 80 Ahmed, El-Shater Bosaily, Brown (R11) 2017; 389 Thompson, van Leeuwen, Moses (R12) 2016; 195 Olivier, Li, Nieboer (R13) 2022; 35 Frye, George, Kilchevsky (R27) 2017; 197 Giganti, Stabile, Stavrinides (R18) 2021; 31 Crump, Remmers, Van Hemelrijck (R9) 2021; 10 Hamdy, Donovan, Lane (R3) 2016; 375 Thurtle, Barrett, Thankappan-Nair (R19) 2018; 122 Mottet, van den Bergh, Briers (R1) 2021; 79 Filippou, Welty, Cowan, Perez, Shinohara, Carroll (R30) 2015; 68 Cooperberg (R2) 2017; 3 Wilt, Brawer, Jones (R29) 2012; 367 Padhani, Weinreb, Rosenkrantz, Villeirs, Turkbey, Barentsz (R16) 2019; 75 Loeb, Vellekoop, Ahmed (R8) 2013; 64 Moore, Giganti, Albertsen (R14) 2017; 71 Chen, Johnston, Reyes, Soto, Babaian, Troncoso (R17) 2003; 27 Fujihara, Iwata, Shakir (R23) 2021; 127 Lam, MacLennan, Willemse (R5) 2019; 76 Klotz (R6) 2020; 125 Klotz, Vesprini, Sethukavalan (R4) 2015; 33 Caglic, Sushentsev, Gnanapragasam (R21) 2021; 31 |
References_xml | – volume: 375 start-page: 1415 issue: 15 year: 2016 end-page: 1424 ident: R3 article-title: 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer publication-title: N Engl J Med. – volume: 195 start-page: 1428 issue: 5 year: 2016 end-page: 1435 ident: R12 article-title: The diagnostic performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect significant prostate cancer publication-title: J Urol. – volume: 367 start-page: 203 issue: 3 year: 2012 end-page: 213 ident: R29 article-title: Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer publication-title: New Engl J Med. – volume: 379 start-page: 589 issue: 6 year: 2018 end-page: 590 ident: R10 article-title: MRI-targeted biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis publication-title: N Engl J Med. – volume: 122 start-page: 59 issue: 1 year: 2018 end-page: 65 ident: R19 article-title: Progression and treatment rates using an active surveillance protocol incorporating image-guided baseline biopsies and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging monitoring for men with favourable-risk prostate cancer publication-title: BJU Int. – volume: 13 start-page: 3274 issue: 13 year: 2021 ident: R28 article-title: Effects of delayed radical prostatectomy and active surveillance on localised prostate cancer-a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Cancers (Basel). – volume: 389 start-page: 815 issue: 10071 year: 2017 end-page: 822 ident: R11 article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study publication-title: Lancet. – volume: 10 start-page: 2828 issue: 6 year: 2021 end-page: 2831 ident: R7 article-title: Active surveillance for prostate cancer-will the discoveries of the last 5 years change the future? publication-title: Translational Androl Urol. – volume: 68 start-page: 458 issue: 3 year: 2015 end-page: 463 ident: R30 article-title: Immediate versus delayed radical prostatectomy: updated outcomes following active surveillance of prostate cancer publication-title: Eur Urol. – volume: 77 start-page: 501 issue: 4 year: 2020 end-page: 507 ident: R22 article-title: Role of changes in magnetic resonance imaging or clinical stage in evaluation of disease progression for men with prostate cancer on active surveillance publication-title: Eur Urol. – volume: 127 start-page: 712 issue: 6 year: 2021 end-page: 721 ident: R23 article-title: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging facilitates reclassification during active surveillance for prostate cancer publication-title: BJU Int. – volume: 3 start-page: 1398 issue: 10 year: 2017 end-page: 1399 ident: R2 article-title: Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer-an evolving international standard of care publication-title: JAMA Oncol. – volume: 33 start-page: 272 issue: 3 year: 2015 end-page: 277 ident: R4 article-title: Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer publication-title: J Clin Oncol. – volume: 31 start-page: 2696 issue: 5 year: 2021 end-page: 2705 ident: R21 article-title: MRI-derived PRECISE scores for predicting pathologically-confirmed radiological progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance publication-title: Eur Radiol. – volume: 71 start-page: 648 issue: 4 year: 2017 end-page: 655 ident: R14 article-title: Reporting magnetic resonance imaging in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: the PRECISE recommendations-a report of a European School of Oncology Task Force publication-title: Eur Urol. – volume: 35 start-page: 59 year: 2022 end-page: 67 ident: R13 article-title: Prostate cancer patients under active surveillance with a suspicious magnetic resonance imaging finding are at increased risk of needing treatment: results of the Movember Foundation's Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) Consortium publication-title: Eur Urol Open Sci. – volume: 31 start-page: 1644 issue: 3 year: 2021 end-page: 1655 ident: R18 article-title: Natural history of prostate cancer on active surveillance: stratification by MRI using the PRECISE recommendations in a UK cohort publication-title: Eur Radiol. – volume: 27 start-page: 1291 issue: 10 year: 2003 end-page: 1301 ident: R17 article-title: A streamlined three-dimensional volume estimation method accurately classifies prostate tumors by volume publication-title: Am J Surg Pathol. – volume: 7 start-page: 102 issue: 1 year: 2021 end-page: 110 ident: R25 article-title: Standardized magnetic resonance imaging reporting using the prostate cancer radiological estimation of change in sequential evaluation criteria and magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion with transperineal saturation biopsy to select men on active surveillance publication-title: Eur Urol Focus. – volume: 7 start-page: 47 issue: 1 year: 2021 end-page: 54 ident: R26 article-title: Outcomes of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent biopsy in men with low-risk prostate cancer managed with active surveillance publication-title: Eur Urol Focus. – volume: 79 start-page: 243 issue: 2 year: 2021 end-page: 262 ident: R1 article-title: EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent publication-title: Eur Urol. – volume: 197 start-page: 640 issue: 31 year: 2017 end-page: 646 ident: R27 article-title: Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound guided fusion biopsy to detect progression in patients with existing lesions on active surveillance for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer publication-title: J Urol. – volume: 75 start-page: 385 issue: 3 year: 2019 end-page: 396 ident: R16 article-title: Prostate imaging-reporting and data system steering committee: PI-RADS v2 status update and future directions publication-title: Eur Urol. – volume: 125 start-page: 346 issue: 3 year: 2020 end-page: 354 ident: R6 article-title: Active surveillance in intermediate-risk prostate cancer publication-title: BJU Int. – volume: 80 start-page: 549 issue: 5 year: 2021 end-page: 563 ident: R15 article-title: Reliability of serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect prostate cancer progression during active surveillance: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Eur Urol. – volume: 126 start-page: 124 issue: 1 year: 2020 end-page: 132 ident: R24 article-title: Prostate cancer upgrading with serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging and repeat biopsy in men on active surveillance: are confirmatory biopsies still necessary? publication-title: BJU Int. – volume: 76 start-page: 790 issue: 6 year: 2019 end-page: 813 ident: R5 article-title: EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG prostate cancer Guideline panel consensus statements for deferred treatment with curative intent for localised prostate cancer from an international collaborative study (DETECTIVE study) publication-title: Eur Urol. – volume: 10 start-page: 2719 issue: 6 year: 2021 end-page: 2727 ident: R9 article-title: Using the Movember Foundation's GAP3 cohort to measure the effect of active surveillance on patient-reported urinary and sexual function-a retrospective study in low-risk prostate cancer patients publication-title: Transl Androl Urol. – volume: 52 start-page: 8 issue: 1 year: 2018 end-page: 13 ident: R20 article-title: Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging monitoring patients in active surveillance for prostate cancer: a prospective cohort study publication-title: Scand J Urol. – volume: 64 start-page: 876 issue: 6 year: 2013 end-page: 892 ident: R8 article-title: Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy publication-title: Eur Urol. |
SSID | ssj0014572 |
Score | 2.441525 |
Snippet | Purpose:This study aimed to assess the medium-term oncologic outcomes of an active surveillance protocol, replacing confirmatory biopsy with serial... This study aimed to assess the medium-term oncologic outcomes of an active surveillance protocol, replacing confirmatory biopsy with serial multiparametric... |
SourceID | proquest crossref wolterskluwer |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 1028 |
Title | Final Analysis of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance Trial |
URI | https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&DO=10.1097/JU.0000000000002885 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2700638859 |
Volume | 208 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLZKJyEkhLiKcZOReBsZqWM7yeNglC2sBakN7C2KE4cVaILaBgS_nuNL0gSmidGHqMqtic_Xc7HP-Q5Cz7ifKispHJKy3KG0kE4gXOr4oS-ZJzllug_ZZMqPYhqdstPB4Gcna6neiP3s17l1Jf8jVdgHclVVspeQbHtT2AHfQb6wBQnD9p9kPNYtrbq8IsqNnKSfSlWaqKfmS10ScLw0zYh0ewidLDSrV9-l6jikDs_Vs3bd1G3BmHZV61Vv8v2wMrOm3azCmcooVZzQpgBoszlbfF7vRfstoJaWrGC5TQeenZUL23rZgsNOP0DkOupNP3ys1KL-es8k9Xc1rQpyPcOm2Wha4gYdSLGO3lRuTscGj1zDivKXfje8wVFsaCfthwSm60-fTXv6Lnl_OE5Ojqdv-we18Y5iR5UxeMEVtEMgwiBDtPPm5cmHg3YJijK_pZpXL9JQVoX-i3N-v-_WbGOV6z_MAH3R49NxXeY30Q0rSHxgAHQLDWR5G12d2KyKO2iicYQbHOGqwIAj3OAItzjCFkd4UWKDI9zFEdY4uovi8ev5qyPHttlwMg-0vZN6uaRpzgomM0ayTGQZvHwB2jngnBZB5oYkZ0QyIXwuIUTIqaA8F7QQYgQGz7uHhmVVyvsIe1ke5q7MA8EJDcJAnSBI6jHBKYdYYReRZpSSzHLQq1YoX5MmFyKKkz-Hdhc9by_6ZihYLj79aTP8CahKtf6VlrKq14nKsQBzEzB4Drcnl8QUHV902weXv-Qhurb9xzxCw82qlo_Bhd2IJxZsvwG7BZQx |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Final+Analysis+of+the+Magnetic+Resonance+Imaging+in+Active+Surveillance+Trial&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+urology&rft.au=Doan%2C+Paul&rft.au=Scheltema%2C+Matthijs+J.&rft.au=Amin%2C+Amer&rft.au=Shnier%2C+Ron&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.pub=Wolters+Kluwer&rft.issn=0022-5347&rft.volume=208&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1028&rft.epage=1036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FJU.0000000000002885&rft.externalDBID=NO_PDF_LINK&rft.externalDocID=JU-22-338 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-5347&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-5347&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-5347&client=summon |