Statistical models for assessing agreement for quantitative data with heterogeneous random raters and replicate measurements

Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration through Bland–Altman plots. We consider the situation where the observed measurement methods are considered a random sample from a populatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe international journal of biostatistics Vol. 20; no. 2; pp. 455 - 466
Main Authors Ekstrøm, Claus Thorn, Carstensen, Bendix
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany De Gruyter 01.11.2024
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration through Bland–Altman plots. We consider the situation where the observed measurement methods are considered a random sample from a population of possible methods, and discuss how the underlying linear mixed effects model can be extended to this situation. This is relevant when, for example, the methods represent raters/judges that are used to score specific individuals or items. In the case of random methods, we are not interested in estimates pertaining to the specific methods, but are instead interested in quantifying the variation between the methods actually involved making measurements, and accommodating this as an extra source of variation when generalizing to the clinical performance of a method. In the model we allow raters to have individual precision/skill and permit linked replicates ( , when the numbering, labeling or ordering of the replicates within items is important). Applications involving estimation of the limits of agreement for two datasets are shown: A dataset of spatial perception among a group of students as well as a dataset on consumer preference of French chocolate. The models are implemented in the package for R [Carstensen B, Gurrin L, Ekstrøm CT, Figurski M. MethComp: functions for analysis of agreement in method comparison studies; 2013. R package version 1.22, R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012].
AbstractList Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration through Bland–Altman plots. We consider the situation where the observed measurement methods are considered a random sample from a population of possible methods, and discuss how the underlying linear mixed effects model can be extended to this situation. This is relevant when, for example, the methods represent raters/judges that are used to score specific individuals or items. In the case of random methods, we are not interested in estimates pertaining to the specific methods, but are instead interested in quantifying the variation between the methods actually involved making measurements, and accommodating this as an extra source of variation when generalizing to the clinical performance of a method. In the model we allow raters to have individual precision/skill and permit linked replicates (i.e., when the numbering, labeling or ordering of the replicates within items is important). Applications involving estimation of the limits of agreement for two datasets are shown: A dataset of spatial perception among a group of students as well as a dataset on consumer preference of French chocolate. The models are implemented in the MethComp package for R [Carstensen B, Gurrin L, Ekstrøm CT, Figurski M. MethComp: functions for analysis of agreement in method comparison studies; 2013. R package version 1.22, R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012].
Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration through Bland–Altman plots. We consider the situation where the observed measurement methods are considered a random sample from a population of possible methods, and discuss how the underlying linear mixed effects model can be extended to this situation. This is relevant when, for example, the methods represent raters/judges that are used to score specific individuals or items. In the case of random methods, we are not interested in estimates pertaining to the specific methods, but are instead interested in quantifying the variation between the methods actually involved making measurements, and accommodating this as an extra source of variation when generalizing to the clinical performance of a method. In the model we allow raters to have individual precision/skill and permit linked replicates ( i.e. , when the numbering, labeling or ordering of the replicates within items is important). Applications involving estimation of the limits of agreement for two datasets are shown: A dataset of spatial perception among a group of students as well as a dataset on consumer preference of French chocolate. The models are implemented in the MethComp package for R [Carstensen B, Gurrin L, Ekstrøm CT, Figurski M. MethComp: functions for analysis of agreement in method comparison studies; 2013. R package version 1.22, R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012].
Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration through Bland-Altman plots. We consider the situation where the observed measurement methods are considered a random sample from a population of possible methods, and discuss how the underlying linear mixed effects model can be extended to this situation. This is relevant when, for example, the methods represent raters/judges that are used to score specific individuals or items. In the case of random methods, we are not interested in estimates pertaining to the specific methods, but are instead interested in quantifying the variation between the methods actually involved making measurements, and accommodating this as an extra source of variation when generalizing to the clinical performance of a method. In the model we allow raters to have individual precision/skill and permit linked replicates (i.e., when the numbering, labeling or ordering of the replicates within items is important). Applications involving estimation of the limits of agreement for two datasets are shown: A dataset of spatial perception among a group of students as well as a dataset on consumer preference of French chocolate. The models are implemented in the MethComp package for R [Carstensen B, Gurrin L, Ekstrøm CT, Figurski M. MethComp: functions for analysis of agreement in method comparison studies; 2013. R package version 1.22, R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012].Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration through Bland-Altman plots. We consider the situation where the observed measurement methods are considered a random sample from a population of possible methods, and discuss how the underlying linear mixed effects model can be extended to this situation. This is relevant when, for example, the methods represent raters/judges that are used to score specific individuals or items. In the case of random methods, we are not interested in estimates pertaining to the specific methods, but are instead interested in quantifying the variation between the methods actually involved making measurements, and accommodating this as an extra source of variation when generalizing to the clinical performance of a method. In the model we allow raters to have individual precision/skill and permit linked replicates (i.e., when the numbering, labeling or ordering of the replicates within items is important). Applications involving estimation of the limits of agreement for two datasets are shown: A dataset of spatial perception among a group of students as well as a dataset on consumer preference of French chocolate. The models are implemented in the MethComp package for R [Carstensen B, Gurrin L, Ekstrøm CT, Figurski M. MethComp: functions for analysis of agreement in method comparison studies; 2013. R package version 1.22, R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012].
Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration through Bland-Altman plots. We consider the situation where the observed measurement methods are considered a random sample from a population of possible methods, and discuss how the underlying linear mixed effects model can be extended to this situation. This is relevant when, for example, the methods represent raters/judges that are used to score specific individuals or items. In the case of random methods, we are not interested in estimates pertaining to the specific methods, but are instead interested in quantifying the variation between the methods actually involved making measurements, and accommodating this as an extra source of variation when generalizing to the clinical performance of a method. In the model we allow raters to have individual precision/skill and permit linked replicates ( , when the numbering, labeling or ordering of the replicates within items is important). Applications involving estimation of the limits of agreement for two datasets are shown: A dataset of spatial perception among a group of students as well as a dataset on consumer preference of French chocolate. The models are implemented in the MethComp package for R [Carstensen B, Gurrin L, Ekstrøm CT, Figurski M. MethComp: functions for analysis of agreement in method comparison studies; 2013. R package version 1.22, R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012].
Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration through Bland–Altman plots. We consider the situation where the observed measurement methods are considered a random sample from a population of possible methods, and discuss how the underlying linear mixed effects model can be extended to this situation. This is relevant when, for example, the methods represent raters/judges that are used to score specific individuals or items. In the case of random methods, we are not interested in estimates pertaining to the specific methods, but are instead interested in quantifying the variation between the methods actually involved making measurements, and accommodating this as an extra source of variation when generalizing to the clinical performance of a method. In the model we allow raters to have individual precision/skill and permit linked replicates ( , when the numbering, labeling or ordering of the replicates within items is important). Applications involving estimation of the limits of agreement for two datasets are shown: A dataset of spatial perception among a group of students as well as a dataset on consumer preference of French chocolate. The models are implemented in the package for R [Carstensen B, Gurrin L, Ekstrøm CT, Figurski M. MethComp: functions for analysis of agreement in method comparison studies; 2013. R package version 1.22, R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012].
Author Ekstrøm, Claus Thorn
Carstensen, Bendix
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Claus Thorn
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1191-373X
  surname: Ekstrøm
  fullname: Ekstrøm, Claus Thorn
  email: ekstrom@sund.ku.dk
  organization: Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Bendix
  surname: Carstensen
  fullname: Carstensen, Bendix
  email: bendix.carstensen@regionh.dk
  organization: Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38379532$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNptkclrFUEQhxuJmEWPXqXBi5fRXmfBkwQ3CHhQz03PdPXLPGamX7p6EgL-8dZ7Ly6Ip9q-WqjfOTtZ0gKMPZfitbTSvhm3faWE0pUQunnEzqS1TWXqpjv5yz9l54hbIYxsZfeEnepWN53V6oz9-Fp8GbGMg5_4nAJMyGPK3CMC4rhsuN9kgBmWcsjfrH4p477nFnjwxfO7sVzzayiQ0wYWSCvy7JeQZjKURE4Bz7CbaEUBPoPHNR8G4lP2OPoJ4dmDvWDfP7z_dvmpuvry8fPlu6tq0KorVexNMHHogjCdFaExqldWy1jXsQ99SxUt7DBAI2torW9bqpgYe-VDUJ2N-oK9Os7d5XSzAhY3jzjANPnDvU51hNFHTE3oy3_QbVrzQtc5LU1jrFKyJerFA7X2MwS3y-Ps87379VcCqiMw5ISYIf5GpHB73Rzp5va6ub1uxL898nd-oqcF2OT1npw_2__bR46xVv8E_Amg8A
Cites_doi 10.1002/0471445428
10.2307/2987937
10.1371/journal.pone.0168321
10.1186/s12874-020-01022-x
10.1191/096228099673819272
10.1002/9781118553282
10.1201/b10433
10.1002/9780470683019
10.1016/0010-4825(90)90013-F
10.1080/10543400701376480
10.2202/1557-4679.1107
10.1002/sim.1253
10.1016/j.jspi.2007.03.056
10.1080/10543400701329422
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
– notice: 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.1515/ijb-2023-0037
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
EISSN 1557-4679
EndPage 466
ExternalDocumentID 38379532
10_1515_ijb_2023_0037
10_1515_ijb_2023_0037202455
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-~S
0R~
123
1WD
4.4
53G
AAAEU
AAAVF
AACIX
AADQG
AAFPC
AAGVJ
AAILP
AAJBH
AALGR
AAOUV
AAOWA
AAPJK
AAQCX
AARVR
AASQH
AAXCG
ABAQN
ABDRH
ABFKT
ABJNI
ABMBZ
ABMIY
ABPLS
ABRDF
ABSOE
ABWLS
ABYBW
ABYKJ
ACDEB
ACEFL
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHNZ
ACONX
ACPMA
ACUND
ACYCL
ACZBO
ADEQT
ADGQD
ADGYE
ADJVZ
ADOZN
AECWL
AEDGQ
AEGVQ
AEICA
AEJQW
AEMOE
AENEX
AEQDQ
AEQLX
AERZL
AFBAA
AFBDD
AFBQV
AFCXV
AFYRI
AGBEV
AGQYU
AHCWZ
AHVWV
AHXUK
AIWOI
AKXKS
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWYM
AMVHM
ASYPN
BAKPI
BBCWN
BCIFA
CFGNV
CKPZI
CS3
DASCH
DU5
F5P
HZ~
IY9
J9A
K.~
KDIRW
MV1
NQBSW
O9-
P2P
QD8
SA.
SLJYH
T2Y
UK5
WTRAM
AAYXX
CITATION
ABVMU
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
ADNPR
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-fb4d4fc9d04950d742b2531f66fbdb8fc9305cce716e85a88f664ffb2add295f3
ISSN 1557-4679
2194-573X
IngestDate Sun Aug 24 04:04:36 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 22:57:18 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:55:20 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:03:16 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 10:30:28 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords random raters
mixed models
agreement
method comparison
limits og agreement
Language English
License 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c329t-fb4d4fc9d04950d742b2531f66fbdb8fc9305cce716e85a88f664ffb2add295f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-1191-373X
PMID 38379532
PQID 3147452218
PQPubID 2031306
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2929537946
proquest_journals_3147452218
pubmed_primary_38379532
crossref_primary_10_1515_ijb_2023_0037
walterdegruyter_journals_10_1515_ijb_2023_0037202455
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-11-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-11-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-11-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Germany
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Germany
– name: Berlin
PublicationTitle The international journal of biostatistics
PublicationTitleAlternate Int J Biostat
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher De Gruyter
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Publisher_xml – name: De Gruyter
– name: Walter de Gruyter GmbH
References 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_011
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_010
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_004
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_015
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_003
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_014
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_002
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_013
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_012
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_001
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_019
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_008
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_018
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_007
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_017
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_006
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_005
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_016
2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_009
References_xml – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_011
  doi: 10.1002/0471445428
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_007
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_013
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_012
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_001
  doi: 10.2307/2987937
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_016
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168321
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_015
  doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01022-x
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_004
  doi: 10.1191/096228099673819272
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_010
  doi: 10.1002/9781118553282
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_019
  doi: 10.1201/b10433
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_006
  doi: 10.1002/9780470683019
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_003
  doi: 10.1016/0010-4825(90)90013-F
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_002
  doi: 10.1080/10543400701376480
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_008
  doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1107
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_014
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_018
  doi: 10.1002/sim.1253
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_017
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_009
  doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2007.03.056
– ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_005
  doi: 10.1080/10543400701329422
SSID ssj0041819
Score 2.3582363
Snippet Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
walterdegruyter
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 455
SubjectTerms agreement
Agreements
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Humans
limits og agreement
method comparison
mixed models
Models, Statistical
random raters
Title Statistical models for assessing agreement for quantitative data with heterogeneous random raters and replicate measurements
URI https://www.degruyter.com/doi/10.1515/ijb-2023-0037
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38379532
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3147452218
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2929537946
Volume 20
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaWVkj0UPEmUJCREJcqkHXsPI7dVaFCgtMW9RbFsUO30KQkWUERP4Sfy4yd17Z7KFyiXVuJHc-XeXjGM4S88jjPQsljF5R57fLM89w0ksyNhQx4NlVKZujR_fgpODrmH07EyWTyZxS1tGrkm-zXxnMl_0NVaAO64inZf6Bs_1BogN9AX7gCheF6IxqjpmgSLeMRECxpU9ugSOPINacPwZo2-3-m_fsqLcyZMowWwtBQuwt7ihExJQyiMRwWZJcqz_cxg0Rl8zdX2vq49f75sKFYj7VaxNpybWtxlJBCLsu6m-egwH-tG-Okn0UGkPNvKYy9OC2rHqxzMLkxvN7yxZku1PLneI-C8faw3oititAFlmyZo97Q1vJi5o0wx0aMldtkvq2M5rZSyzX2L0ymjOWZdLEqvIvJdQY51_n2r4i_PigRzSF4QAK3J3g7pk0Nb5FtBgYIcNDtg_ezw8-dlOegGcUmF2_7Fm3-VnjA27Xx1_Wda0bMDtn9YeIilP5SrS6bzg9v1JvFXbLb2iX0wILsHpno4j65bSuVXj4gv0dQoxZqFCBFe6jRHmqmfQw1ilCjCDW6BjVqoUYt1Cj8oT3U6BhqD8nxu8PF_MhtC3e4mc_ixs0lVzzPYgXmp_BUyJlkwOvzIMilkhH0gJTJMg22uo5EGkXQw_NcMhC2LBa5_4hsFWWhnxAaCSVZIGOpPZ9Dj4yVnmZC56lIBUtzh7zulje5sPlZko2EdMhet_hJ-w3UiT_lIZYUmEYOedl3A4NFr1lq1iJhYEAIH-swOOSxJVo_Em7vQCdzCL9CxWGMjbPBj0SIpzed_DNyZ_is9shWU630c1CGG_mixeVf8hS9jw
linkProvider Walter de Gruyter
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB7BVoj2UF6FBgoYCXFLN3HsbHIsqGWBtqcWcYv8pFB2A5tEVSt-PDN5bKHlBMd4YsWxPS_P-BuAl5EQZqJFHqIx70JhoihUmeZhLnUqTGytNhTRPThMp8fi_Sc5ZBNWfVqldZ8XzXndIaSObWkaOihbYg2gBh5_-apDKvwdEn7K-KSefbsJKxkBsYxgZeft692PgzjGtjjvwTWv9fxTGV2zMNdg_awNWi9H9Jvu2bsDehh1l3Jyut3UettcXAF0_K_fugvrvWXKdrqtdA9uuPl9uNXVqjx_AD_JLG1RnfGltn5OxdDgZaqNGqMCZApd9_awsW3_0ah5e4ENxSmjPFRGR77shNJvSty1rmwqhorSljNGcBWLiuEDW7guoO7Y7PL0stqA473dozfTsC_dEJqE53XotbDCm9yiAyIji_635sjtPk29tjpDCsoZYxx6ay6TKsuQIrzXHMUtz6VPHsJoXs7dJrBMWs1TnWsXJQIpOrcuNtJ5JZXkygfwaljD4nuH0FGQZ4PzWeB8FjSfhIA6CWBrWOGiZ9SqSGIxIVD5OAvgxZKMLEZxE9XORcHRhJQJIfEH8KjbGcsvkYOPRB6AuLJVLr_x19FwinnLx__W7Tncnh4d7Bf77w4_PIFVauzuR27BqF407ikaSrV-1rPCL0ViFOs
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB7BViA4lFehoQWMhLi5mzh2Njm20KW8Kg4U9Rb5yUvdtJtEqIgfz0yS3ZaWExzjiRVnPPbMeMbfADyLpbQTIwuOxrzn0sYx17kRvFAmkzZxzliK6L7fz_YO5JtDdXjuFj-lVTr_ed6eNj1C6thVtqWDsiXWAGrg8ddvhlPhb074KeNjF67CSi6TOB_Byvarnd1Pi91YogYrBmzNSx3_1EWXDMybsPqji1kvB3RO9UxvgV4Mus84-b7VNmbL_ryA5_g_f3UbVge7lG33gnQHrvjZXbjWV6o8vQe_yCjtMJ3xpa56Ts3Q3GW6ixmj-mMaHffuqLFrP2n1rLu-hpspoyxURge-7Asl31Qos75qa4Zq0lVHjMAq5jXDBzb3fTjds6Ozs8t6DQ6mux9f7PGhcAO3qSgaHox0MtjCofuhYofetxG41kOWBeNMjhTcZaz16Kv5XOk8R4oMwQjcbEWhQnofRrNq5teB5coZkZnC-DiVSDGF84lVPmilldAhgueLKSyPe3yOkvwaZGeJ7CyJnYR_OolgczHB5bBM6zJN5IQg5ZM8gqdLMi4wiprojhelQANSpYTDH8GDXjCWXyL3HokiAnlBUs6-8dfRCIp4q4f_1u0JXP_wclq-e73_dgNuUFt_OXITRs289Y_QSmrM42Eh_AYAsROS
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Statistical+models+for+assessing+agreement+for+quantitative+data+with+heterogeneous+random+raters+and+replicate+measurements&rft.jtitle=The+international+journal+of+biostatistics&rft.au=Ekstr%C3%B8m%2C+Claus+Thorn&rft.au=Carstensen%2C+Bendix&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.issn=1557-4679&rft.eissn=1557-4679&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=455&rft.epage=466&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515%2Fijb-2023-0037&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1515_ijb_2023_0037
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1557-4679&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1557-4679&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1557-4679&client=summon