Statistical models for assessing agreement for quantitative data with heterogeneous random raters and replicate measurements
Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration through Bland–Altman plots. We consider the situation where the observed measurement methods are considered a random sample from a populatio...
Saved in:
Published in | The international journal of biostatistics Vol. 20; no. 2; pp. 455 - 466 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Germany
De Gruyter
01.11.2024
Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration through Bland–Altman plots. We consider the situation where the observed measurement methods are considered a random sample from a population of possible methods, and discuss how the underlying linear mixed effects model can be extended to this situation. This is relevant when, for example, the methods represent raters/judges that are used to score specific individuals or items. In the case of random methods, we are not interested in estimates pertaining to the specific methods, but are instead interested in quantifying the variation between the methods actually involved making measurements, and accommodating this as an extra source of variation when generalizing to the clinical performance of a method. In the model we allow raters to have individual precision/skill and permit linked replicates (
, when the numbering, labeling or ordering of the replicates within items is important). Applications involving estimation of the limits of agreement for two datasets are shown: A dataset of spatial perception among a group of students as well as a dataset on consumer preference of French chocolate. The models are implemented in the
package for R [Carstensen B, Gurrin L, Ekstrøm CT, Figurski M. MethComp: functions for analysis of agreement in method comparison studies; 2013. R package version 1.22, R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012]. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration through Bland–Altman plots. We consider the situation where the observed measurement methods are considered a random sample from a population of possible methods, and discuss how the underlying linear mixed effects model can be extended to this situation. This is relevant when, for example, the methods represent raters/judges that are used to score specific individuals or items. In the case of random methods, we are not interested in estimates pertaining to the specific methods, but are instead interested in quantifying the variation between the methods actually involved making measurements, and accommodating this as an extra source of variation when generalizing to the clinical performance of a method. In the model we allow raters to have individual precision/skill and permit linked replicates (i.e., when the numbering, labeling or ordering of the replicates within items is important). Applications involving estimation of the limits of agreement for two datasets are shown: A dataset of spatial perception among a group of students as well as a dataset on consumer preference of French chocolate. The models are implemented in the MethComp package for R [Carstensen B, Gurrin L, Ekstrøm CT, Figurski M. MethComp: functions for analysis of agreement in method comparison studies; 2013. R package version 1.22, R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012]. Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration through Bland–Altman plots. We consider the situation where the observed measurement methods are considered a random sample from a population of possible methods, and discuss how the underlying linear mixed effects model can be extended to this situation. This is relevant when, for example, the methods represent raters/judges that are used to score specific individuals or items. In the case of random methods, we are not interested in estimates pertaining to the specific methods, but are instead interested in quantifying the variation between the methods actually involved making measurements, and accommodating this as an extra source of variation when generalizing to the clinical performance of a method. In the model we allow raters to have individual precision/skill and permit linked replicates ( i.e. , when the numbering, labeling or ordering of the replicates within items is important). Applications involving estimation of the limits of agreement for two datasets are shown: A dataset of spatial perception among a group of students as well as a dataset on consumer preference of French chocolate. The models are implemented in the MethComp package for R [Carstensen B, Gurrin L, Ekstrøm CT, Figurski M. MethComp: functions for analysis of agreement in method comparison studies; 2013. R package version 1.22, R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012]. Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration through Bland-Altman plots. We consider the situation where the observed measurement methods are considered a random sample from a population of possible methods, and discuss how the underlying linear mixed effects model can be extended to this situation. This is relevant when, for example, the methods represent raters/judges that are used to score specific individuals or items. In the case of random methods, we are not interested in estimates pertaining to the specific methods, but are instead interested in quantifying the variation between the methods actually involved making measurements, and accommodating this as an extra source of variation when generalizing to the clinical performance of a method. In the model we allow raters to have individual precision/skill and permit linked replicates (i.e., when the numbering, labeling or ordering of the replicates within items is important). Applications involving estimation of the limits of agreement for two datasets are shown: A dataset of spatial perception among a group of students as well as a dataset on consumer preference of French chocolate. The models are implemented in the MethComp package for R [Carstensen B, Gurrin L, Ekstrøm CT, Figurski M. MethComp: functions for analysis of agreement in method comparison studies; 2013. R package version 1.22, R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012].Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration through Bland-Altman plots. We consider the situation where the observed measurement methods are considered a random sample from a population of possible methods, and discuss how the underlying linear mixed effects model can be extended to this situation. This is relevant when, for example, the methods represent raters/judges that are used to score specific individuals or items. In the case of random methods, we are not interested in estimates pertaining to the specific methods, but are instead interested in quantifying the variation between the methods actually involved making measurements, and accommodating this as an extra source of variation when generalizing to the clinical performance of a method. In the model we allow raters to have individual precision/skill and permit linked replicates (i.e., when the numbering, labeling or ordering of the replicates within items is important). Applications involving estimation of the limits of agreement for two datasets are shown: A dataset of spatial perception among a group of students as well as a dataset on consumer preference of French chocolate. The models are implemented in the MethComp package for R [Carstensen B, Gurrin L, Ekstrøm CT, Figurski M. MethComp: functions for analysis of agreement in method comparison studies; 2013. R package version 1.22, R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012]. Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration through Bland-Altman plots. We consider the situation where the observed measurement methods are considered a random sample from a population of possible methods, and discuss how the underlying linear mixed effects model can be extended to this situation. This is relevant when, for example, the methods represent raters/judges that are used to score specific individuals or items. In the case of random methods, we are not interested in estimates pertaining to the specific methods, but are instead interested in quantifying the variation between the methods actually involved making measurements, and accommodating this as an extra source of variation when generalizing to the clinical performance of a method. In the model we allow raters to have individual precision/skill and permit linked replicates ( , when the numbering, labeling or ordering of the replicates within items is important). Applications involving estimation of the limits of agreement for two datasets are shown: A dataset of spatial perception among a group of students as well as a dataset on consumer preference of French chocolate. The models are implemented in the MethComp package for R [Carstensen B, Gurrin L, Ekstrøm CT, Figurski M. MethComp: functions for analysis of agreement in method comparison studies; 2013. R package version 1.22, R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012]. Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration through Bland–Altman plots. We consider the situation where the observed measurement methods are considered a random sample from a population of possible methods, and discuss how the underlying linear mixed effects model can be extended to this situation. This is relevant when, for example, the methods represent raters/judges that are used to score specific individuals or items. In the case of random methods, we are not interested in estimates pertaining to the specific methods, but are instead interested in quantifying the variation between the methods actually involved making measurements, and accommodating this as an extra source of variation when generalizing to the clinical performance of a method. In the model we allow raters to have individual precision/skill and permit linked replicates ( , when the numbering, labeling or ordering of the replicates within items is important). Applications involving estimation of the limits of agreement for two datasets are shown: A dataset of spatial perception among a group of students as well as a dataset on consumer preference of French chocolate. The models are implemented in the package for R [Carstensen B, Gurrin L, Ekstrøm CT, Figurski M. MethComp: functions for analysis of agreement in method comparison studies; 2013. R package version 1.22, R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012]. |
Author | Ekstrøm, Claus Thorn Carstensen, Bendix |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Claus Thorn orcidid: 0000-0003-1191-373X surname: Ekstrøm fullname: Ekstrøm, Claus Thorn email: ekstrom@sund.ku.dk organization: Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark – sequence: 2 givenname: Bendix surname: Carstensen fullname: Carstensen, Bendix email: bendix.carstensen@regionh.dk organization: Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38379532$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkclrFUEQhxuJmEWPXqXBi5fRXmfBkwQ3CHhQz03PdPXLPGamX7p6EgL-8dZ7Ly6Ip9q-WqjfOTtZ0gKMPZfitbTSvhm3faWE0pUQunnEzqS1TWXqpjv5yz9l54hbIYxsZfeEnepWN53V6oz9-Fp8GbGMg5_4nAJMyGPK3CMC4rhsuN9kgBmWcsjfrH4p477nFnjwxfO7sVzzayiQ0wYWSCvy7JeQZjKURE4Bz7CbaEUBPoPHNR8G4lP2OPoJ4dmDvWDfP7z_dvmpuvry8fPlu6tq0KorVexNMHHogjCdFaExqldWy1jXsQ99SxUt7DBAI2torW9bqpgYe-VDUJ2N-oK9Os7d5XSzAhY3jzjANPnDvU51hNFHTE3oy3_QbVrzQtc5LU1jrFKyJerFA7X2MwS3y-Ps87379VcCqiMw5ISYIf5GpHB73Rzp5va6ub1uxL898nd-oqcF2OT1npw_2__bR46xVv8E_Amg8A |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/0471445428 10.2307/2987937 10.1371/journal.pone.0168321 10.1186/s12874-020-01022-x 10.1191/096228099673819272 10.1002/9781118553282 10.1201/b10433 10.1002/9780470683019 10.1016/0010-4825(90)90013-F 10.1080/10543400701376480 10.2202/1557-4679.1107 10.1002/sim.1253 10.1016/j.jspi.2007.03.056 10.1080/10543400701329422 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. – notice: 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM K9. 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1515/ijb-2023-0037 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Biology |
EISSN | 1557-4679 |
EndPage | 466 |
ExternalDocumentID | 38379532 10_1515_ijb_2023_0037 10_1515_ijb_2023_0037202455 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -~S 0R~ 123 1WD 4.4 53G AAAEU AAAVF AACIX AADQG AAFPC AAGVJ AAILP AAJBH AALGR AAOUV AAOWA AAPJK AAQCX AARVR AASQH AAXCG ABAQN ABDRH ABFKT ABJNI ABMBZ ABMIY ABPLS ABRDF ABSOE ABWLS ABYBW ABYKJ ACDEB ACEFL ACGFO ACGFS ACHNZ ACONX ACPMA ACUND ACYCL ACZBO ADEQT ADGQD ADGYE ADJVZ ADOZN AECWL AEDGQ AEGVQ AEICA AEJQW AEMOE AENEX AEQDQ AEQLX AERZL AFBAA AFBDD AFBQV AFCXV AFYRI AGBEV AGQYU AHCWZ AHVWV AHXUK AIWOI AKXKS ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWYM AMVHM ASYPN BAKPI BBCWN BCIFA CFGNV CKPZI CS3 DASCH DU5 F5P HZ~ IY9 J9A K.~ KDIRW MV1 NQBSW O9- P2P QD8 SA. SLJYH T2Y UK5 WTRAM AAYXX CITATION ABVMU CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ADNPR K9. 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-fb4d4fc9d04950d742b2531f66fbdb8fc9305cce716e85a88f664ffb2add295f3 |
ISSN | 1557-4679 2194-573X |
IngestDate | Sun Aug 24 04:04:36 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 22:57:18 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:55:20 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:03:16 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 10:30:28 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | random raters mixed models agreement method comparison limits og agreement |
Language | English |
License | 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c329t-fb4d4fc9d04950d742b2531f66fbdb8fc9305cce716e85a88f664ffb2add295f3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-1191-373X |
PMID | 38379532 |
PQID | 3147452218 |
PQPubID | 2031306 |
PageCount | 12 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2929537946 proquest_journals_3147452218 pubmed_primary_38379532 crossref_primary_10_1515_ijb_2023_0037 walterdegruyter_journals_10_1515_ijb_2023_0037202455 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-11-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-11-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2024 text: 2024-11-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Germany |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Germany – name: Berlin |
PublicationTitle | The international journal of biostatistics |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Int J Biostat |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | De Gruyter Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
Publisher_xml | – name: De Gruyter – name: Walter de Gruyter GmbH |
References | 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_011 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_010 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_004 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_015 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_003 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_014 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_002 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_013 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_012 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_001 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_019 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_008 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_018 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_007 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_017 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_006 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_005 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_016 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_009 |
References_xml | – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_011 doi: 10.1002/0471445428 – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_007 – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_013 – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_012 – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_001 doi: 10.2307/2987937 – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_016 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168321 – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_015 doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01022-x – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_004 doi: 10.1191/096228099673819272 – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_010 doi: 10.1002/9781118553282 – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_019 doi: 10.1201/b10433 – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_006 doi: 10.1002/9780470683019 – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_003 doi: 10.1016/0010-4825(90)90013-F – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_002 doi: 10.1080/10543400701376480 – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_008 doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1107 – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_014 – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_018 doi: 10.1002/sim.1253 – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_017 – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_009 doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2007.03.056 – ident: 2024122017142016447_j_ijb-2023-0037_ref_005 doi: 10.1080/10543400701329422 |
SSID | ssj0041819 |
Score | 2.3582363 |
Snippet | Agreement between methods for quantitative measurements are typically assessed by computing limits of agreement between pairs of methods and/or by illustration... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref walterdegruyter |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 455 |
SubjectTerms | agreement Agreements Data Interpretation, Statistical Humans limits og agreement method comparison mixed models Models, Statistical random raters |
Title | Statistical models for assessing agreement for quantitative data with heterogeneous random raters and replicate measurements |
URI | https://www.degruyter.com/doi/10.1515/ijb-2023-0037 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38379532 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3147452218 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2929537946 |
Volume | 20 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaWVkj0UPEmUJCREJcqkHXsPI7dVaFCgtMW9RbFsUO30KQkWUERP4Sfy4yd17Z7KFyiXVuJHc-XeXjGM4S88jjPQsljF5R57fLM89w0ksyNhQx4NlVKZujR_fgpODrmH07EyWTyZxS1tGrkm-zXxnMl_0NVaAO64inZf6Bs_1BogN9AX7gCheF6IxqjpmgSLeMRECxpU9ugSOPINacPwZo2-3-m_fsqLcyZMowWwtBQuwt7ihExJQyiMRwWZJcqz_cxg0Rl8zdX2vq49f75sKFYj7VaxNpybWtxlJBCLsu6m-egwH-tG-Okn0UGkPNvKYy9OC2rHqxzMLkxvN7yxZku1PLneI-C8faw3oititAFlmyZo97Q1vJi5o0wx0aMldtkvq2M5rZSyzX2L0ymjOWZdLEqvIvJdQY51_n2r4i_PigRzSF4QAK3J3g7pk0Nb5FtBgYIcNDtg_ezw8-dlOegGcUmF2_7Fm3-VnjA27Xx1_Wda0bMDtn9YeIilP5SrS6bzg9v1JvFXbLb2iX0wILsHpno4j65bSuVXj4gv0dQoxZqFCBFe6jRHmqmfQw1ilCjCDW6BjVqoUYt1Cj8oT3U6BhqD8nxu8PF_MhtC3e4mc_ixs0lVzzPYgXmp_BUyJlkwOvzIMilkhH0gJTJMg22uo5EGkXQw_NcMhC2LBa5_4hsFWWhnxAaCSVZIGOpPZ9Dj4yVnmZC56lIBUtzh7zulje5sPlZko2EdMhet_hJ-w3UiT_lIZYUmEYOedl3A4NFr1lq1iJhYEAIH-swOOSxJVo_Em7vQCdzCL9CxWGMjbPBj0SIpzed_DNyZ_is9shWU630c1CGG_mixeVf8hS9jw |
linkProvider | Walter de Gruyter |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB7BVoj2UF6FBgoYCXFLN3HsbHIsqGWBtqcWcYv8pFB2A5tEVSt-PDN5bKHlBMd4YsWxPS_P-BuAl5EQZqJFHqIx70JhoihUmeZhLnUqTGytNhTRPThMp8fi_Sc5ZBNWfVqldZ8XzXndIaSObWkaOihbYg2gBh5_-apDKvwdEn7K-KSefbsJKxkBsYxgZeft692PgzjGtjjvwTWv9fxTGV2zMNdg_awNWi9H9Jvu2bsDehh1l3Jyut3UettcXAF0_K_fugvrvWXKdrqtdA9uuPl9uNXVqjx_AD_JLG1RnfGltn5OxdDgZaqNGqMCZApd9_awsW3_0ah5e4ENxSmjPFRGR77shNJvSty1rmwqhorSljNGcBWLiuEDW7guoO7Y7PL0stqA473dozfTsC_dEJqE53XotbDCm9yiAyIji_635sjtPk29tjpDCsoZYxx6ay6TKsuQIrzXHMUtz6VPHsJoXs7dJrBMWs1TnWsXJQIpOrcuNtJ5JZXkygfwaljD4nuH0FGQZ4PzWeB8FjSfhIA6CWBrWOGiZ9SqSGIxIVD5OAvgxZKMLEZxE9XORcHRhJQJIfEH8KjbGcsvkYOPRB6AuLJVLr_x19FwinnLx__W7Tncnh4d7Bf77w4_PIFVauzuR27BqF407ikaSrV-1rPCL0ViFOs |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB7BViA4lFehoQWMhLi5mzh2Njm20KW8Kg4U9Rb5yUvdtJtEqIgfz0yS3ZaWExzjiRVnPPbMeMbfADyLpbQTIwuOxrzn0sYx17kRvFAmkzZxzliK6L7fz_YO5JtDdXjuFj-lVTr_ed6eNj1C6thVtqWDsiXWAGrg8ddvhlPhb074KeNjF67CSi6TOB_Byvarnd1Pi91YogYrBmzNSx3_1EWXDMybsPqji1kvB3RO9UxvgV4Mus84-b7VNmbL_ryA5_g_f3UbVge7lG33gnQHrvjZXbjWV6o8vQe_yCjtMJ3xpa56Ts3Q3GW6ixmj-mMaHffuqLFrP2n1rLu-hpspoyxURge-7Asl31Qos75qa4Zq0lVHjMAq5jXDBzb3fTjds6Ozs8t6DQ6mux9f7PGhcAO3qSgaHox0MtjCofuhYofetxG41kOWBeNMjhTcZaz16Kv5XOk8R4oMwQjcbEWhQnofRrNq5teB5coZkZnC-DiVSDGF84lVPmilldAhgueLKSyPe3yOkvwaZGeJ7CyJnYR_OolgczHB5bBM6zJN5IQg5ZM8gqdLMi4wiprojhelQANSpYTDH8GDXjCWXyL3HokiAnlBUs6-8dfRCIp4q4f_1u0JXP_wclq-e73_dgNuUFt_OXITRs289Y_QSmrM42Eh_AYAsROS |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Statistical+models+for+assessing+agreement+for+quantitative+data+with+heterogeneous+random+raters+and+replicate+measurements&rft.jtitle=The+international+journal+of+biostatistics&rft.au=Ekstr%C3%B8m%2C+Claus+Thorn&rft.au=Carstensen%2C+Bendix&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.issn=1557-4679&rft.eissn=1557-4679&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=455&rft.epage=466&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515%2Fijb-2023-0037&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1515_ijb_2023_0037 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1557-4679&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1557-4679&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1557-4679&client=summon |