Cancer Rehabilitation Providers and Oncology Patient Expectations for Functional Outcomes after Inpatient Rehabilitation
Background Cancer rehabilitation is a valued resource for patients and oncologists. Cancer rehabilitation providers are seeing increasing numbers of referrals for inpatient rehabilitation as the number of cancer survivors grows. However, cancer rehabilitation providers, oncologists, therapists, pati...
Saved in:
Published in | PM & R Vol. 13; no. 7; pp. 729 - 736 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken, USA
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.07.2021
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background
Cancer rehabilitation is a valued resource for patients and oncologists. Cancer rehabilitation providers are seeing increasing numbers of referrals for inpatient rehabilitation as the number of cancer survivors grows. However, cancer rehabilitation providers, oncologists, therapists, patients, and caregivers may not always clearly communicate the goals of care, which can lead to different expectations for inpatient rehabilitation.
Objective
To determine the difference in expectations of function after an acute inpatient rehabilitation stay between cancer patients and cancer rehabilitation providers and how they align with achieved goals after treatment.
Design
Prospective survey study.
Setting
Quaternary academic medical center inpatient rehabilitation unit.
Participants
Out of 194 eligible patients, 132 were enrolled and completed admission surveys, and 110 completed the discharge survey. Twelve cancer rehabilitation providers completed the surveys.
Interventions
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures
Barthel Index.
Results
Patients estimated their expected functional status as a median (interquartile range) score of 19 points (18, 20) using the Barthel Index, compared to cancer rehabilitation providers, who estimated a median score of 17 points (15, 19) (P < .001). Actual functional status upon discharge was a median score of 16 points (13, 18) using the Barthel Index, which was three points lower than expected by patients (P < .001).
Conclusions
Oncology patients and cancer rehabilitation providers significantly overestimate functional goals for acute inpatient rehabilitation. This overestimation was clinically significant for oncology patients and statistically but not clinically significant for cancer rehabilitation providers. Increased communication may allow for a more realistic expectation of functional status upon discharge. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Cancer rehabilitation is a valued resource for patients and oncologists. Cancer rehabilitation providers are seeing increasing numbers of referrals for inpatient rehabilitation as the number of cancer survivors grows. However, cancer rehabilitation providers, oncologists, therapists, patients, and caregivers may not always clearly communicate the goals of care, which can lead to different expectations for inpatient rehabilitation.
To determine the difference in expectations of function after an acute inpatient rehabilitation stay between cancer patients and cancer rehabilitation providers and how they align with achieved goals after treatment.
Prospective survey study.
Quaternary academic medical center inpatient rehabilitation unit.
Out of 194 eligible patients, 132 were enrolled and completed admission surveys, and 110 completed the discharge survey. Twelve cancer rehabilitation providers completed the surveys.
Not applicable.
Barthel Index.
Patients estimated their expected functional status as a median (interquartile range) score of 19 points (18, 20) using the Barthel Index, compared to cancer rehabilitation providers, who estimated a median score of 17 points (15, 19) (P < .001). Actual functional status upon discharge was a median score of 16 points (13, 18) using the Barthel Index, which was three points lower than expected by patients (P < .001).
Oncology patients and cancer rehabilitation providers significantly overestimate functional goals for acute inpatient rehabilitation. This overestimation was clinically significant for oncology patients and statistically but not clinically significant for cancer rehabilitation providers. Increased communication may allow for a more realistic expectation of functional status upon discharge. Background Cancer rehabilitation is a valued resource for patients and oncologists. Cancer rehabilitation providers are seeing increasing numbers of referrals for inpatient rehabilitation as the number of cancer survivors grows. However, cancer rehabilitation providers, oncologists, therapists, patients, and caregivers may not always clearly communicate the goals of care, which can lead to different expectations for inpatient rehabilitation. Objective To determine the difference in expectations of function after an acute inpatient rehabilitation stay between cancer patients and cancer rehabilitation providers and how they align with achieved goals after treatment. Design Prospective survey study. Setting Quaternary academic medical center inpatient rehabilitation unit. Participants Out of 194 eligible patients, 132 were enrolled and completed admission surveys, and 110 completed the discharge survey. Twelve cancer rehabilitation providers completed the surveys. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Barthel Index. Results Patients estimated their expected functional status as a median (interquartile range) score of 19 points (18, 20) using the Barthel Index, compared to cancer rehabilitation providers, who estimated a median score of 17 points (15, 19) ( P < .001). Actual functional status upon discharge was a median score of 16 points (13, 18) using the Barthel Index, which was three points lower than expected by patients ( P < .001). Conclusions Oncology patients and cancer rehabilitation providers significantly overestimate functional goals for acute inpatient rehabilitation. This overestimation was clinically significant for oncology patients and statistically but not clinically significant for cancer rehabilitation providers. Increased communication may allow for a more realistic expectation of functional status upon discharge. BACKGROUNDCancer rehabilitation is a valued resource for patients and oncologists. Cancer rehabilitation providers are seeing increasing numbers of referrals for inpatient rehabilitation as the number of cancer survivors grows. However, cancer rehabilitation providers, oncologists, therapists, patients, and caregivers may not always clearly communicate the goals of care, which can lead to different expectations for inpatient rehabilitation. OBJECTIVETo determine the difference in expectations of function after an acute inpatient rehabilitation stay between cancer patients and cancer rehabilitation providers and how they align with achieved goals after treatment. DESIGNProspective survey study. SETTINGQuaternary academic medical center inpatient rehabilitation unit. PARTICIPANTSOut of 194 eligible patients, 132 were enrolled and completed admission surveys, and 110 completed the discharge survey. Twelve cancer rehabilitation providers completed the surveys. INTERVENTIONSNot applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESBarthel Index. RESULTSPatients estimated their expected functional status as a median (interquartile range) score of 19 points (18, 20) using the Barthel Index, compared to cancer rehabilitation providers, who estimated a median score of 17 points (15, 19) (P < .001). Actual functional status upon discharge was a median score of 16 points (13, 18) using the Barthel Index, which was three points lower than expected by patients (P < .001). CONCLUSIONSOncology patients and cancer rehabilitation providers significantly overestimate functional goals for acute inpatient rehabilitation. This overestimation was clinically significant for oncology patients and statistically but not clinically significant for cancer rehabilitation providers. Increased communication may allow for a more realistic expectation of functional status upon discharge. Background Cancer rehabilitation is a valued resource for patients and oncologists. Cancer rehabilitation providers are seeing increasing numbers of referrals for inpatient rehabilitation as the number of cancer survivors grows. However, cancer rehabilitation providers, oncologists, therapists, patients, and caregivers may not always clearly communicate the goals of care, which can lead to different expectations for inpatient rehabilitation. Objective To determine the difference in expectations of function after an acute inpatient rehabilitation stay between cancer patients and cancer rehabilitation providers and how they align with achieved goals after treatment. Design Prospective survey study. Setting Quaternary academic medical center inpatient rehabilitation unit. Participants Out of 194 eligible patients, 132 were enrolled and completed admission surveys, and 110 completed the discharge survey. Twelve cancer rehabilitation providers completed the surveys. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Barthel Index. Results Patients estimated their expected functional status as a median (interquartile range) score of 19 points (18, 20) using the Barthel Index, compared to cancer rehabilitation providers, who estimated a median score of 17 points (15, 19) (P < .001). Actual functional status upon discharge was a median score of 16 points (13, 18) using the Barthel Index, which was three points lower than expected by patients (P < .001). Conclusions Oncology patients and cancer rehabilitation providers significantly overestimate functional goals for acute inpatient rehabilitation. This overestimation was clinically significant for oncology patients and statistically but not clinically significant for cancer rehabilitation providers. Increased communication may allow for a more realistic expectation of functional status upon discharge. |
Author | Ng, Amy H. Ngo‐Huang, An Bansal, Swati Fu, Jack B. Yadav, Rajesh Gupta, Ekta Bruera, Eduardo Park, Minjeong |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ekta orcidid: 0000-0003-1716-7803 surname: Gupta fullname: Gupta, Ekta email: egupta@mdanderson.org organization: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center – sequence: 2 givenname: Amy H. orcidid: 0000-0001-7555-1745 surname: Ng fullname: Ng, Amy H. email: ang@mdanderson.org organization: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center – sequence: 3 givenname: Jack B. orcidid: 0000-0002-9397-0668 surname: Fu fullname: Fu, Jack B. organization: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center – sequence: 4 givenname: Rajesh orcidid: 0000-0002-2833-5334 surname: Yadav fullname: Yadav, Rajesh organization: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center – sequence: 5 givenname: An surname: Ngo‐Huang fullname: Ngo‐Huang, An organization: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center – sequence: 6 givenname: Swati surname: Bansal fullname: Bansal, Swati organization: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center – sequence: 7 givenname: Minjeong surname: Park fullname: Park, Minjeong organization: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center – sequence: 8 givenname: Eduardo surname: Bruera fullname: Bruera, Eduardo organization: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33470547$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMofl_8AZKjCKv5aJv0KMuqK8oui55LNp1opU1q0qr7783aVfDiKRPmmXeY5wBtW2cBoRNKLigh7LJt_OsFZYngW2if5jwZ0TTj2z91ItkeOgjhlZAsoTLbRXucJ4KkidhHn2NlNXi8gBe1rOqqU13lLJ57916V4ANWtsQzq13tnld4HrtgOzz5bEEPaMDGeXzdW73-qRrP-k67BuKk6WLw1Labob8rjtCOUXWA4817iJ6uJ4_j29H97GY6vrofac5yPtKgpFHGCDAsTwVdAtMyjTUTXNKM5EQKTfN4Viq5hFKmwnBBSEmFymAp-SE6G3Jb7956CF3RVEFDXSsLrg9F1JYnjDGaRPR8QLV3IXgwReurRvlVQUmxNl2sTRffpiN8usntlw2Uv-iP2gjQAfioalj9E1XMHxZ3Q-gXy7aMvQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1097_PHM_0000000000002331 crossref_primary_10_1002_pmrj_12741 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmr_2023_12_016 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_052378 crossref_primary_10_1177_10732748211047091 |
Cites_doi | 10.1136/bmj.321.7273.1381 10.1177/1545968305279206 10.1177/1545968306294729 10.1097/00000421-198212000-00014 10.1097/00002060-200007000-00003 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601231 10.1007/s00520-015-2916-1 10.1007/s11136-009-9520-0 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182063ba6 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31817fb94e 10.1016/0003-9993(86)90121-8 10.1023/A:1005710729748 10.3109/09638288809164103 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.04.006 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.05.016 10.1007/s005200050271 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.6489 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.06.440 10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90046-7 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.08.539 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-001073 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2020 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2020 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2020 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation – notice: 2020 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. |
DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1002/pmrj.12473 |
DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Physical Therapy |
EISSN | 1934-1563 |
EndPage | 736 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1002_pmrj_12473 33470547 PMRJ12473 |
Genre | article Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .FO .~1 0R~ 123 1B1 1OC 1P~ 1~. 33P 457 4G. 53G 5VS 7-5 8P~ AAEDT AAHHS AAIKJ AALRI AANLZ AAOAW AAXUO ABBQC ABCUV ABMZM ABQWH ABXDB ACCFJ ACCZN ACJTP ACPOU ACXQS ADBTR ADEZE ADKYN ADMUD ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEKER AENEX AEQDE AEUYR AEVXI AFCTW AFFPM AFRHN AFXBA AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHBTC AITUG AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJOXV AJRQY AJUYK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMYDB ANZVX BLXMC C45 DCZOG F5P FDB FEDTE FIRID FNPLU GBLVA HGLYW HVGLF HZ~ LATKE LEEKS LYRES M41 MEWTI MO0 O-L O9- OAUVE OH. OT. OVD P-8 P-9 P2W PC. Q38 RIG ROL SDF SEL SES SUPJJ T5K TEORI WXSBR Z5R ZZTAW NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3293-cea8faff7ef29571be2c85f2927381609087c191865838ed857f3700d17a6eb83 |
ISSN | 1934-1482 |
IngestDate | Wed Jul 24 17:13:27 EDT 2024 Wed Aug 14 12:34:49 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 08:25:09 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 01:00:59 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 7 |
Language | English |
License | 2020 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3293-cea8faff7ef29571be2c85f2927381609087c191865838ed857f3700d17a6eb83 |
Notes | Disclosure: none.Prior presentations: Abstract presented at the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Annual Meeting, Austria, Vienna in June 2018 and University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center/The Institute for Rehabilitation and Research (TIRR) Cancer Symposium, Houston, Texas in March 2019.Funding: Dr. Bruera receives research funding from Helsinn Healthcare SA, Strategic Collaboration Agreement Award No. 52626. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-2833-5334 0000-0003-1716-7803 0000-0002-9397-0668 0000-0001-7555-1745 |
PMID | 33470547 |
PQID | 2479422214 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2479422214 crossref_primary_10_1002_pmrj_12473 pubmed_primary_33470547 wiley_primary_10_1002_pmrj_12473_PMRJ12473 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | July 2021 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2021 text: July 2021 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Hoboken, USA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Hoboken, USA – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | PM & R |
PublicationTitleAlternate | PM R |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc |
References | 2017; 7 1965; 14 1991; 155 1988; 10 1999; 7 2013; 5 2017; 9 2015; 23 2005; 19 2011; 90 2000; 79 1982; 5 1986; 67 2013; 31 1997; 34 2019 2000; 81 2008; 87 1981 2000; 321 2007; 21 2012; 4 2016; 8 2009; 18 2003; 89 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 Society AC (e_1_2_7_2_1) 2019 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 e_1_2_7_27_1 O'Toole DM (e_1_2_7_17_1) 1991; 155 Dietz JH (e_1_2_7_16_1) 1981 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_24_1 Mahoney FI (e_1_2_7_8_1) 1965; 14 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 Hernandez‐Quiles C (e_1_2_7_23_1) 2017; 7 |
References_xml | – volume: 321 start-page: 1381 issue: 7273 year: 2000 end-page: 1382 article-title: Using the modified Barthel index to estimate survival in cancer patients in hospice: observational study publication-title: BMJ – year: 1981 – volume: 5 start-page: 649 issue: 6 year: 1982 end-page: 655 article-title: Toxicity and response criteria of the eastern cooperative oncology group publication-title: Am J Clin Oncol – volume: 4 start-page: 96 issue: 2 year: 2012 end-page: 108 article-title: Oncologists' and physiatrists' attitudes regarding rehabilitation for patients with advanced cancer publication-title: PM R – volume: 8 start-page: 131 issue: 2 year: 2016 end-page: 137 article-title: Cancer rehabilitation: do functional gains relate to 60 percent rule classification or to the presence of metastasis? publication-title: PM R – volume: 9 start-page: 1135 issue: 11 year: 2017 end-page: 1143 article-title: Patient‐reported usefulness of acute cancer rehabilitation publication-title: PM R – volume: 79 start-page: 327 issue: 4 year: 2000 end-page: 335 article-title: Functional outcomes in patients with brain tumor after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison with traumatic brain injury publication-title: Am J Phys Med Rehabil – volume: 81 start-page: 623 issue: 5 year: 2000 end-page: 627 article-title: Functional recovery in cancer rehabilitation publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil – volume: 89 start-page: 1022 issue: 6 year: 2003 end-page: 1027 article-title: Performance status score: do patients and their oncologists agree? publication-title: Br J Cancer – volume: 10 start-page: 61 issue: 2 year: 1988 end-page: 63 article-title: The Barthel ADL index: a reliability study publication-title: Int Disabil Stud – volume: 87 start-page: 647 issue: 8 year: 2008 end-page: 653 article-title: Incidence of and risk factors for transferring cancer patients from rehabilitation to acute care units publication-title: Am J Phys Med Rehabil – volume: 7 start-page: 300 issue: 3 year: 2017 end-page: 307 article-title: Concordance of Barthel index, ECOG‐PS, and palliative performance scale in the assessment of functional status in patients with advanced medical diseases publication-title: BMJ Support Palliat Care – volume: 23 start-page: 3633 issue: 12 year: 2015 end-page: 3643 article-title: Cancer rehabilitation and palliative care: critical components in the delivery of high‐quality oncology services publication-title: Support Care Cancer – volume: 14 start-page: 61 year: 1965 end-page: 65 article-title: Functional evaluation: the Barthel index publication-title: Md State Med J – volume: 67 start-page: 123 issue: 2 year: 1986 end-page: 125 article-title: Program evaluation of physical medicine and rehabilitation departments using self‐report Barthel publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil – volume: 7 start-page: 332 issue: 5 year: 1999 end-page: 335 article-title: Observer error in grading performance status in cancer patients publication-title: Support Care Cancer – volume: 21 start-page: 233 issue: 3 year: 2007 end-page: 238 article-title: Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the Barthel index in stroke patients publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair – volume: 19 start-page: 227 issue: 3 year: 2005 end-page: 231 article-title: A survey of goal‐setting methods used in rehabilitation publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair – volume: 155 start-page: 384 issue: 4 year: 1991 end-page: 387 article-title: Evaluating cancer patients for rehabilitation potential publication-title: West J Med – volume: 31 start-page: 3869 issue: 31 year: 2013 end-page: 3876 article-title: Marital status and survival in patients with cancer publication-title: J Clin Oncol – year: 2019 – volume: 18 start-page: 999 issue: 8 year: 2009 end-page: 1010 article-title: Agreement of patient and physician ratings on mobility and self‐care in neurological diseases publication-title: Qual Life Res – volume: 34 start-page: 187 issue: 2 year: 1997 end-page: 192 article-title: Verbally administered Barthel index as functional assessment in brain tumour patients publication-title: J Neurooncol – volume: 5 start-page: 622 issue: 7 year: 2013 end-page: 628 article-title: When teams fumble: cancer rehabilitation and the problem of the “handoff” publication-title: PM R – volume: 90 start-page: 265 issue: 4 year: 2011 end-page: 271 article-title: Inpatient rehabilitation improved functional status in asthenic patients with solid and hematologic malignancies publication-title: Am J Phys Med Rehabil – ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7273.1381 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1177/1545968305279206 – volume-title: Rehabilitation Oncology year: 1981 ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 contributor: fullname: Dietz JH – volume-title: Cancer Facts & Figures 2019 year: 2019 ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 contributor: fullname: Society AC – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.1177/1545968306294729 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1097/00000421-198212000-00014 – ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 doi: 10.1097/00002060-200007000-00003 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601231 – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2916-1 – volume: 14 start-page: 61 year: 1965 ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 article-title: Functional evaluation: the Barthel index publication-title: Md State Med J contributor: fullname: Mahoney FI – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9520-0 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182063ba6 – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31817fb94e – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(86)90121-8 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1005710729748 – volume: 155 start-page: 384 issue: 4 year: 1991 ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 article-title: Evaluating cancer patients for rehabilitation potential publication-title: West J Med contributor: fullname: O'Toole DM – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.3109/09638288809164103 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.04.006 – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.05.016 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1007/s005200050271 – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.6489 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.06.440 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90046-7 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.08.539 – volume: 7 start-page: 300 issue: 3 year: 2017 ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 article-title: Concordance of Barthel index, ECOG‐PS, and palliative performance scale in the assessment of functional status in patients with advanced medical diseases publication-title: BMJ Support Palliat Care doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-001073 contributor: fullname: Hernandez‐Quiles C |
SSID | ssj0064186 |
Score | 2.3242993 |
Snippet | Background
Cancer rehabilitation is a valued resource for patients and oncologists. Cancer rehabilitation providers are seeing increasing numbers of referrals... Cancer rehabilitation is a valued resource for patients and oncologists. Cancer rehabilitation providers are seeing increasing numbers of referrals for... Background Cancer rehabilitation is a valued resource for patients and oncologists. Cancer rehabilitation providers are seeing increasing numbers of referrals... BACKGROUNDCancer rehabilitation is a valued resource for patients and oncologists. Cancer rehabilitation providers are seeing increasing numbers of referrals... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 729 |
Title | Cancer Rehabilitation Providers and Oncology Patient Expectations for Functional Outcomes after Inpatient Rehabilitation |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fpmrj.12473 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33470547 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2479422214 |
Volume | 13 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LbxMxELZCuXDh_QgvGcGJakPsfdh7LFWrUClthFKpnFa241VF1W2U7FaFA_-I_8j4sc6mAUS5rFaOZW9mvp0Ze2c-I_RuNhOcaJ5FLKciSgiXESeqjOK8THKwhpnUpnZ4fJiNjpODk_Sk1_vZyVpqajlQ339bV_I_WoU20Kupkr2BZsOg0AD3oF-4gobh-k863jUqW4CIumzbJvffFtc59uWjSjmapYljULXkxqr2GXAmyXAfXJvfETxqanhOvfRHh3-qPO3qtSm6Ee1kbNGzSuRp5i4g3Turg8k_tAZl5_zb9mgQENO4LF11tv0xNH4RM3Fp1S6-6uVpd0-CkpC_6v3FZtLPRmYnBI5JZEhInSPqtKXe4rXmOe7AkHVsLfNbJc5tuwqGTY_gGGbn5wtwCjRxx6as026HXumf-1mHPxl_PrC_3UK3Kdg1Y1AHP0JGUQZIz1wSg_tngQ2XfliNux7_bCxq1tdINsiZ3kd3_eoE7zioPUA9XT1E9yb-XcZTR0HxCF055OF1WOCAPAzIwy3ysEce7iIPA_LwCnm4RR62yMMBedemeIyO9_emu6PIn-ERqRgiyUhpwUtRlkyXNE8ZkZoqnsK9KQkj2TAfcqZIDpIz3-_1jKesjNlwOCNMZFry-Anaqi4q_QzhHMSnYyIV5SLJVJ5LWfJEEcKk2bRQffS2lWwxd1QthSPlpoWRf2Hl30dvWqEXYEnN5zFR6YtmWVBz2AKMRJI-euq0EcaJ44TB4ob10Xurnr9MUASYPL9J5xfozupNeom26kWjX0G8W8vXFmW_APmxqas |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,27936,27937 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cancer+Rehabilitation+Providers+and+Oncology+Patient+Expectations+for+Functional+Outcomes+after+Inpatient+Rehabilitation&rft.jtitle=PM+%26+R&rft.au=Gupta%2C+Ekta&rft.au=Ng%2C+Amy+H.&rft.au=Fu%2C+Jack+B.&rft.au=Yadav%2C+Rajesh&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.pub=John+Wiley+%26+Sons%2C+Inc&rft.issn=1934-1482&rft.eissn=1934-1563&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=729&rft.epage=736&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fpmrj.12473&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fpmrj.12473&rft.externalDocID=PMRJ12473 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1934-1482&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1934-1482&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1934-1482&client=summon |