Factors Affecting the Choice of Cosmetic Forehead and/or Eyebrow Lift Technique: An Oculofacial Plastic Surgeon’s Perspective
Background Many different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors drive technique selection. Objectives To compare frequency of different forehead and/or eyebrow lift techniques between sexes, analyze...
Saved in:
Published in | Aesthetic plastic surgery Vol. 49; no. 10; pp. 2720 - 2726 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
01.05.2025
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background
Many different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors drive technique selection.
Objectives
To compare frequency of different forehead and/or eyebrow lift techniques between sexes, analyze factors affecting technique selection, and present an algorithm for technique selection.
Methods
This is a retrospective study of consecutive cosmetic patients who underwent direct eyebrow lift (DEL) or forehead/eyebrow lift (FEL) by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2022. Subjects with prior trauma or surgery, facial nerve palsy, trans-blepharoplasty technique, and functional rather than cosmetic indications were excluded.
Results
There were 1060 subjects. Three patient factors (type of lift request, hairline height, and forehead skin type) were considered in the algorithm. The most frequent procedure in female subjects was conventional endoscopic FEL (83.8%) followed by DEL (9.3%). Male subjects most frequently had DEL (63.1%) followed by conventional endoscopic FEL (16.5%). Patient factors, but not age, were significantly (
p
≤ 0.001) different between the two sexes. While the above three patient factors and sex, but not age, had a significant effect (
p
≤ 0.001) on technique selection on univariate analysis, sex was the only factor that remained significant (
p
≤ 0.001) on multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
Endoscopic FEL was the first and second most frequent technique in female and male subjects, respectively. DEL was the first and second most frequent technique in male and female subjects, respectively. Sex, but not age, was a significant factor affecting the type of lift technique through three patient factors.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background
Many different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors drive technique selection.
Objectives
To compare frequency of different forehead and/or eyebrow lift techniques between sexes, analyze factors affecting technique selection, and present an algorithm for technique selection.
Methods
This is a retrospective study of consecutive cosmetic patients who underwent direct eyebrow lift (DEL) or forehead/eyebrow lift (FEL) by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2022. Subjects with prior trauma or surgery, facial nerve palsy, trans-blepharoplasty technique, and functional rather than cosmetic indications were excluded.
Results
There were 1060 subjects. Three patient factors (type of lift request, hairline height, and forehead skin type) were considered in the algorithm. The most frequent procedure in female subjects was conventional endoscopic FEL (83.8%) followed by DEL (9.3%). Male subjects most frequently had DEL (63.1%) followed by conventional endoscopic FEL (16.5%). Patient factors, but not age, were significantly (
p
≤ 0.001) different between the two sexes. While the above three patient factors and sex, but not age, had a significant effect (
p
≤ 0.001) on technique selection on univariate analysis, sex was the only factor that remained significant (
p
≤ 0.001) on multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
Endoscopic FEL was the first and second most frequent technique in female and male subjects, respectively. DEL was the first and second most frequent technique in male and female subjects, respectively. Sex, but not age, was a significant factor affecting the type of lift technique through three patient factors.
Level of Evidence IV
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
. BackgroundMany different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors drive technique selection.ObjectivesTo compare frequency of different forehead and/or eyebrow lift techniques between sexes, analyze factors affecting technique selection, and present an algorithm for technique selection.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of consecutive cosmetic patients who underwent direct eyebrow lift (DEL) or forehead/eyebrow lift (FEL) by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2022. Subjects with prior trauma or surgery, facial nerve palsy, trans-blepharoplasty technique, and functional rather than cosmetic indications were excluded.ResultsThere were 1060 subjects. Three patient factors (type of lift request, hairline height, and forehead skin type) were considered in the algorithm. The most frequent procedure in female subjects was conventional endoscopic FEL (83.8%) followed by DEL (9.3%). Male subjects most frequently had DEL (63.1%) followed by conventional endoscopic FEL (16.5%). Patient factors, but not age, were significantly (p ≤ 0.001) different between the two sexes. While the above three patient factors and sex, but not age, had a significant effect (p ≤ 0.001) on technique selection on univariate analysis, sex was the only factor that remained significant (p ≤ 0.001) on multivariate analysis.ConclusionEndoscopic FEL was the first and second most frequent technique in female and male subjects, respectively. DEL was the first and second most frequent technique in male and female subjects, respectively. Sex, but not age, was a significant factor affecting the type of lift technique through three patient factors.Level of Evidence IVThis journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266. Many different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors drive technique selection. To compare frequency of different forehead and/or eyebrow lift techniques between sexes, analyze factors affecting technique selection, and present an algorithm for technique selection. This is a retrospective study of consecutive cosmetic patients who underwent direct eyebrow lift (DEL) or forehead/eyebrow lift (FEL) by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2022. Subjects with prior trauma or surgery, facial nerve palsy, trans-blepharoplasty technique, and functional rather than cosmetic indications were excluded. There were 1060 subjects. Three patient factors (type of lift request, hairline height, and forehead skin type) were considered in the algorithm. The most frequent procedure in female subjects was conventional endoscopic FEL (83.8%) followed by DEL (9.3%). Male subjects most frequently had DEL (63.1%) followed by conventional endoscopic FEL (16.5%). Patient factors, but not age, were significantly (p ≤ 0.001) different between the two sexes. While the above three patient factors and sex, but not age, had a significant effect (p ≤ 0.001) on technique selection on univariate analysis, sex was the only factor that remained significant (p ≤ 0.001) on multivariate analysis. Endoscopic FEL was the first and second most frequent technique in female and male subjects, respectively. DEL was the first and second most frequent technique in male and female subjects, respectively. Sex, but not age, was a significant factor affecting the type of lift technique through three patient factors. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . Many different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors drive technique selection.BACKGROUNDMany different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors drive technique selection.To compare frequency of different forehead and/or eyebrow lift techniques between sexes, analyze factors affecting technique selection, and present an algorithm for technique selection.OBJECTIVESTo compare frequency of different forehead and/or eyebrow lift techniques between sexes, analyze factors affecting technique selection, and present an algorithm for technique selection.This is a retrospective study of consecutive cosmetic patients who underwent direct eyebrow lift (DEL) or forehead/eyebrow lift (FEL) by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2022. Subjects with prior trauma or surgery, facial nerve palsy, trans-blepharoplasty technique, and functional rather than cosmetic indications were excluded.METHODSThis is a retrospective study of consecutive cosmetic patients who underwent direct eyebrow lift (DEL) or forehead/eyebrow lift (FEL) by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2022. Subjects with prior trauma or surgery, facial nerve palsy, trans-blepharoplasty technique, and functional rather than cosmetic indications were excluded.There were 1060 subjects. Three patient factors (type of lift request, hairline height, and forehead skin type) were considered in the algorithm. The most frequent procedure in female subjects was conventional endoscopic FEL (83.8%) followed by DEL (9.3%). Male subjects most frequently had DEL (63.1%) followed by conventional endoscopic FEL (16.5%). Patient factors, but not age, were significantly (p ≤ 0.001) different between the two sexes. While the above three patient factors and sex, but not age, had a significant effect (p ≤ 0.001) on technique selection on univariate analysis, sex was the only factor that remained significant (p ≤ 0.001) on multivariate analysis.RESULTSThere were 1060 subjects. Three patient factors (type of lift request, hairline height, and forehead skin type) were considered in the algorithm. The most frequent procedure in female subjects was conventional endoscopic FEL (83.8%) followed by DEL (9.3%). Male subjects most frequently had DEL (63.1%) followed by conventional endoscopic FEL (16.5%). Patient factors, but not age, were significantly (p ≤ 0.001) different between the two sexes. While the above three patient factors and sex, but not age, had a significant effect (p ≤ 0.001) on technique selection on univariate analysis, sex was the only factor that remained significant (p ≤ 0.001) on multivariate analysis.Endoscopic FEL was the first and second most frequent technique in female and male subjects, respectively. DEL was the first and second most frequent technique in male and female subjects, respectively. Sex, but not age, was a significant factor affecting the type of lift technique through three patient factors.CONCLUSIONEndoscopic FEL was the first and second most frequent technique in female and male subjects, respectively. DEL was the first and second most frequent technique in male and female subjects, respectively. Sex, but not age, was a significant factor affecting the type of lift technique through three patient factors.This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IVThis journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . |
Author | Clark, Jeremy D. Bhat, Nita Compton, Christopher J. Kashkouli, Mohsen B. Feist, Jack E. Dugan, S. Elizabeth |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jack E. surname: Feist fullname: Feist, Jack E. organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine – sequence: 2 givenname: Mohsen B. orcidid: 0000-0003-0347-5549 surname: Kashkouli fullname: Kashkouli, Mohsen B. email: mkashkouli2@gmail.com organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine – sequence: 3 givenname: S. Elizabeth surname: Dugan fullname: Dugan, S. Elizabeth organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine – sequence: 4 givenname: Nita surname: Bhat fullname: Bhat, Nita organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine – sequence: 5 givenname: Christopher J. surname: Compton fullname: Compton, Christopher J. organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine – sequence: 6 givenname: Jeremy D. surname: Clark fullname: Clark, Jeremy D. organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40016580$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1URLeFF-CALHHhEjq2Y8fhtlp1C9JKrUSRuFmOM9lNlbUXOyntCV6jr8eT4GULSBw4zRy-f-bX_5-QIx88EvKSwVsGUJ0lAK5UAVwWUFZcFXdPyIyVgheSl-yIzECosuBMfT4mJyndADBeVeUzclzmVUkNM_Jtad0YYqLzrkM39n5Nxw3SxSb0Dmno6CKkLY69o8sQcYO2pda3ZyHS83tsYvhKV3030mt0G99_mfAdnXt66aYhdNb1dqBXg017-ccprjH4H98fEr3CmHb7b7f4nDzt7JDwxeM8JZ-W59eL98Xq8uLDYr4qnOBqLFBld2XLnIQGXKV1LQVKZ7GDWjkNUjfa1boEx6VuQSOqurEN1FjVQkMrTsmbw91dDNlmGs22Tw6HwXoMUzKCVZwrzaHO6Ot_0JswRZ_dGZHDrGvNuczUq0dqarbYml3stzbem9_RZoAfABdDShG7PwgDs-_PHPozuT_zqz9zl0XiIEoZ9muMf3__R_UTNZaecQ |
Cites_doi | 10.18502/jovr.v15i2.6740 10.1016/j.amjoto.2011.11.007 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d9f37 10.1016/j.joco.2018.04.005 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006238 10.1080/08820538.2022.2053727 10.1001/archfaci.2009.109 10.3109/01676830903104652 10.1067/maj.2002.122939 10.1097/00006534-199411000-00006 10.1016/j.joco.2017.04.001 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002003 10.1016/j.cps.2012.06.004 10.1093/asj/sjad207 10.1097/01.PRS.0000071042.11435.2E 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009366 10.1067/maj.2002.121964 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001397 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2025 Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. 2025. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Copyright Springer Nature B.V. May 2025 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2025 Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. – notice: 2025. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. – notice: Copyright Springer Nature B.V. May 2025 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM K9. 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1007/s00266-025-04726-x |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1432-5241 |
EndPage | 2726 |
ExternalDocumentID | 40016580 10_1007_s00266_025_04726_x |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- -Y2 -~C .55 .86 .GJ .VR 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 199 1N0 1SB 2.D 203 23M 28- 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 36B 3O- 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5GY 5QI 5RE 5VS 67Z 6NX 78A 7X7 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANXM AANZL AAPKM AAQQT AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBRH ABBXA ABDBE ABDZT ABECU ABFSG ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIPD ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACGFS ACHSB ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACUDM ACZOJ ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADHKG ADIMF ADJJI ADKNI ADKPE ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEFIE AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEIIB AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AEZWR AFBBN AFDZB AFEXP AFKRA AFLOW AFOHR AFQWF AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGQPQ AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHIZS AHKAY AHMBA AHPBZ AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AIXLP AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARMRJ ASPBG ATHPR AVWKF AXYYD AYFIA AZFZN B-. BA0 BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGNMA BPHCQ BSONS BVXVI CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD EMB EMOBN EN4 ESBYG F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ7 GQ8 GRRUI GXS H13 HF~ HG5 HG6 HMCUK HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I09 IHE IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ IWAJR IXC IXD IXE IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KDC KOV KOW KPH L7B LAS LLZTM M1P M4Y MA- N2Q N9A NB0 NDZJH NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM OVD P19 P2P P9S PF0 PHGZM PHGZT PMFND PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PT4 PT5 Q2X QOK QOR QOS R4E R89 R9I RHV RIG RNI ROL RPX RRX RSV RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S37 S3B SAP SCLPG SDE SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJYHP SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SV3 SZ9 SZN T13 T16 TEORI TSG TSK TSV TT1 TUC U2A U9L UG4 UKHRP UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WJK WK8 X7M YLTOR Z45 ZGI ZMTXR ZOVNA ~EX AAYXX ACSTC AFHIU AHWEU CITATION ABRTQ CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY K9. 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-e6fec4d1c50b0c788953e5caef096c8058b8c9840c258d08ee69bab09e79380d3 |
IEDL.DBID | U2A |
ISSN | 0364-216X 1432-5241 |
IngestDate | Tue Aug 05 09:55:16 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 09:27:08 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:04:13 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 03 08:39:25 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 01:11:34 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 10 |
Keywords | Upper face rejuvenation Forehead and eyebrow lifting Endoscopic forehead lift Direct eyebrow lift Endoscopic eyebrow lift |
Language | English |
License | 2025. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c326t-e6fec4d1c50b0c788953e5caef096c8058b8c9840c258d08ee69bab09e79380d3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-0347-5549 |
PMID | 40016580 |
PQID | 3216998225 |
PQPubID | 54048 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_3172268209 proquest_journals_3216998225 pubmed_primary_40016580 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00266_025_04726_x springer_journals_10_1007_s00266_025_04726_x |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20250500 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 5 year: 2025 text: 20250500 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | New York |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York – name: United States – name: Heidelberg |
PublicationTitle | Aesthetic plastic surgery |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Aesth Plast Surg |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Aesthetic Plast Surg |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | Springer US Springer Nature B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer US – name: Springer Nature B.V |
References | R Almousa (4726_CR6) 2009; 28 P Abdolalizadeh (4726_CR7) 2022; 37 MB Kashkouli (4726_CR8) 2019; 35 TZ Shipchandler (4726_CR11) 2012; 33 MB Kashkouli (4726_CR10) 2022; 38 RJE Ting (4726_CR9) 2020; 12 MB Kashkouli (4726_CR1) 2017; 29 LO Vásconez (4726_CR3) 2002; 22 AM Terella (4726_CR14) 2013; 40 ES Chiu (4726_CR15) 2003; 112 O Fisher (4726_CR16) 2010; 12 DM Coombs (4726_CR19) 2023; 44 N Iblher (4726_CR13) 2012; 130 RJ Rohrich (4726_CR18) 2019; 144 LO Vasconez (4726_CR5) 1994; 94 A de la Fuente (4726_CR17) 2002; 22 R Passot (4726_CR4) 1919; 27 H Aslan Gülbitti (4726_CR12) 2022; 150 MB Kashkouli (4726_CR20) 2018; 30 N Karimi (4726_CR2) 2020; 15 |
References_xml | – volume: 15 start-page: 218 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 4726_CR2 publication-title: J Ophthalmic Vis Res doi: 10.18502/jovr.v15i2.6740 – volume: 12 issue: 8 year: 2020 ident: 4726_CR9 publication-title: Cureus – volume: 33 start-page: 519 issue: 5 year: 2012 ident: 4726_CR11 publication-title: Am J Otolaryngol doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2011.11.007 – volume: 130 start-page: 830e issue: 6 year: 2012 ident: 4726_CR13 publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d9f37 – volume: 30 start-page: 99 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: 4726_CR20 publication-title: J Curr Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2018.04.005 – volume: 144 start-page: 1305 issue: 6 year: 2019 ident: 4726_CR18 publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006238 – volume: 37 start-page: 651 issue: 5 year: 2022 ident: 4726_CR7 publication-title: Semin Ophthalmol doi: 10.1080/08820538.2022.2053727 – volume: 12 start-page: 56 issue: 1 year: 2010 ident: 4726_CR16 publication-title: Arch Facial Plast Surg doi: 10.1001/archfaci.2009.109 – volume: 28 start-page: 347 issue: 6 year: 2009 ident: 4726_CR6 publication-title: Orbit doi: 10.3109/01676830903104652 – volume: 22 start-page: 113 issue: 2 year: 2002 ident: 4726_CR17 publication-title: Aesthet Surg J doi: 10.1067/maj.2002.122939 – volume: 94 start-page: 788 issue: 6 year: 1994 ident: 4726_CR5 publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg doi: 10.1097/00006534-199411000-00006 – volume: 29 start-page: 154 issue: 3 year: 2017 ident: 4726_CR1 publication-title: J Curr Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.04.001 – volume: 38 start-page: 138 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 4726_CR10 publication-title: Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002003 – volume: 40 start-page: 105 issue: 1 year: 2013 ident: 4726_CR14 publication-title: Clin Plast Surg doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2012.06.004 – volume: 44 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2023 ident: 4726_CR19 publication-title: Aesthet Surg J doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad207 – volume: 112 start-page: 628 issue: 2 year: 2003 ident: 4726_CR15 publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000071042.11435.2E – volume: 27 start-page: 258 year: 1919 ident: 4726_CR4 publication-title: Presse Med – volume: 150 start-page: 289 issue: 2 year: 2022 ident: 4726_CR12 publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009366 – volume: 22 start-page: 69 issue: 1 year: 2002 ident: 4726_CR3 publication-title: Aesthet Surg J doi: 10.1067/maj.2002.121964 – volume: 35 start-page: 581 issue: 6 year: 2019 ident: 4726_CR8 publication-title: Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001397 |
SSID | ssj0012774 |
Score | 2.4003694 |
Snippet | Background
Many different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what... Many different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors... BackgroundMany different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 2720 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Cohort Studies Endoscopy Endoscopy - methods Esthetics Eyebrows Female Females Forehead - surgery Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Original Articles Otorhinolaryngology Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data Plastic Surgery Rejuvenation - physiology Retrospective Studies Rhytidoplasty - methods Risk Assessment Sexes Surgeons Treatment Outcome |
Title | Factors Affecting the Choice of Cosmetic Forehead and/or Eyebrow Lift Technique: An Oculofacial Plastic Surgeon’s Perspective |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00266-025-04726-x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40016580 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3216998225 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3172268209 |
Volume | 49 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwEB6hVkJcEOUZKJWRuIGF12sndm_papcKaKlEV1pOkeOHigQx6u4KOLV_g7_HL2GcTVKhwoFTDpk4kT8_vsnMfAZ4XmgrhSlyOhLcU1EYRY0TgY6N0ErUIoRWUujoOD-cizcLueiKwpZ9tnsfkmxX6qHYLbkLKWFW0qRwmFNkjtsSffeUyDXn5RA74EXRiUYJykf5oiuV-Xsbf25H1zjmtfhou-3M7sDtji-ScgPwDtzwzV24edRFxO_BxWxzYA4p28QMbIMgpSOTs4grAImBTOLySypUJOkQTlx5HTGNexXPyfQHusPxG3n3KazIaS_luk_Khry3688xmPQ3nZwgvU6Pf0j107H5dflzSU6uKjTvw3w2PZ0c0u5QBWqRqa2oz_FrhBtZyWpm0QHWcuylNT6gM2MVk6pWFmFilkvlmPI-17WpmfY4kxVz4wew1cTGPwISjA5IoGq0YMKjeTHSjnMdnEM7HzJ40fdt9XWjnVENKsktEhUiUbVIVN8z2O27v-rm0bIaI4A6SQzKDJ4Nt3EGpLCGaXxcow1yMJ4jk9EZPNzANrxOJEorFcvgZY_jVeP__pbH_2f-BG7xdkylPMhd2Fqdr_1T5Cqreg-2y9nBwXG6vv74drrXDtXfr8PknQ |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Pb9MwFH8aQ4JdEP_JGGAkOIFF6tqJjcShKqs61o5JtFJvmePYYhIk09pq22n7Gtz5ZHwSnt0kExocOOycF8fy7z379_L-GOBVqozgOk1ohzNLeaol1QV3tKu5kjznzoWWQuO9ZDjln2ZitgY_m1qYkO3ehCTDTt0Wu3l3wSfMCuo7HCb0tE6l3LVnJ-iozT_sfERUXzM22J70h7S-S4AaJCgLahNnDS86RsR5bNDvU6JrhdHWIYc3MhYylwZnFxsmZBFLaxOV6zxWFhVYxkUXx70BN5F8SG87U9ZrYxUsTesmVZyyTjKrS3P-Puc_j78rnPZKPDYcc4O7cKfmp6S3Uqh7sGbL-3BrXEfgH8D5YHVBD-mFRBAcgyCFJP2vFe44pHKkX82_-8JI4i_9xJ2-ILos3lXHZPsM3e_qhIwO3YJMmtax70mvJJ_N8lvltP97T_aRzvvXv_h67ar8dfFjTvYvK0IfwvRaFv4RrJdVaZ8AcVo5JGw5SsTconjaUQVjyhUFylkXwZtmbbOjVa-OrO3KHJDIEIksIJGdRrDVLH9W2-086yKAyrc0FBG8bB-jxfkwii5ttUQZ5HwsQeakIni8gq39HPcUWsg4grcNjpeD_3sum_8n_gJuDyfjUTba2dt9Chss6JfPwdyC9cXx0j5DnrTInwc1JXBw3XbxG6LQHv8 |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VIlVcEG8CBYwEJ7DW67WTGInDattVSx-sRFfaW3D8EEiQVN2s2p7gb_Av-E38EsZ5Vahw4NBzJo7lmbG_ycx8BniRKCOFTmI6FNxRkeiUais8HWmhUpEL72tKoYPDeGcu3i3kYg1-dr0wdbV7l5JsehoCS1NRDY6tH_SNbyF0CMWzkga2w5ietWWVe-78FIO25dvdLdTwS86n20eTHdreK0ANgpWKutg7I-zQSJYzgzGgkiMnjXYe8bxJmUzz1OBMmeEytSx1Lla5zplyaMwpsyMc9xpcF6H7GD1ozsd93oInSUtYJSgfxou2Tefvc_7zKLyEby_lZusjb3oLbrZYlYwb47oNa664AxsHbTb-LnybNpf1kHFdFIJjEISTZPKpxN2HlJ5MyuXX0CRJwgWguOtbogs7KE_I9jmG4uUp2f_sK3LU0ci-IeOCvDerL6XX4U8-mSG0D69_CL3bZfHr-48lmV10h96D-ZUs_H1YL8rCPQTitfII3nKUYMKheDJUlnPlrUU55yN41a1tdtzwdmQ9Q3OtiQw1kdWayM4i2OyWP2t9eJmNUIEq0BvKCJ73j9H7QkpFF65coQziPx4jilIRPGjU1n9OBDgtUxbB606PF4P_ey6P_k_8GWzMtqbZ_u7h3mO4wWvzCuWYm7BenazcE4RMVf60tlICH6_aLX4DO10jMg |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors+Affecting+the+Choice+of+Cosmetic+Forehead+and%2For+Eyebrow+Lift+Technique%3A+An+Oculofacial+Plastic+Surgeon%E2%80%99s+Perspective&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic+plastic+surgery&rft.date=2025-05-01&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.issn=0364-216X&rft.eissn=1432-5241&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2720&rft.epage=2726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00266-025-04726-x&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0364-216X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0364-216X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0364-216X&client=summon |