Factors Affecting the Choice of Cosmetic Forehead and/or Eyebrow Lift Technique: An Oculofacial Plastic Surgeon’s Perspective

Background Many different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors drive technique selection. Objectives To compare frequency of different forehead and/or eyebrow lift techniques between sexes, analyze...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAesthetic plastic surgery Vol. 49; no. 10; pp. 2720 - 2726
Main Authors Feist, Jack E., Kashkouli, Mohsen B., Dugan, S. Elizabeth, Bhat, Nita, Compton, Christopher J., Clark, Jeremy D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.05.2025
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background Many different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors drive technique selection. Objectives To compare frequency of different forehead and/or eyebrow lift techniques between sexes, analyze factors affecting technique selection, and present an algorithm for technique selection. Methods This is a retrospective study of consecutive cosmetic patients who underwent direct eyebrow lift (DEL) or forehead/eyebrow lift (FEL) by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2022. Subjects with prior trauma or surgery, facial nerve palsy, trans-blepharoplasty technique, and functional rather than cosmetic indications were excluded. Results There were 1060 subjects. Three patient factors (type of lift request, hairline height, and forehead skin type) were considered in the algorithm. The most frequent procedure in female subjects was conventional endoscopic FEL (83.8%) followed by DEL (9.3%). Male subjects most frequently had DEL (63.1%) followed by conventional endoscopic FEL (16.5%). Patient factors, but not age, were significantly ( p ≤ 0.001) different between the two sexes. While the above three patient factors and sex, but not age, had a significant effect ( p ≤ 0.001) on technique selection on univariate analysis, sex was the only factor that remained significant ( p ≤ 0.001) on multivariate analysis. Conclusion Endoscopic FEL was the first and second most frequent technique in female and male subjects, respectively. DEL was the first and second most frequent technique in male and female subjects, respectively. Sex, but not age, was a significant factor affecting the type of lift technique through three patient factors. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
AbstractList Background Many different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors drive technique selection. Objectives To compare frequency of different forehead and/or eyebrow lift techniques between sexes, analyze factors affecting technique selection, and present an algorithm for technique selection. Methods This is a retrospective study of consecutive cosmetic patients who underwent direct eyebrow lift (DEL) or forehead/eyebrow lift (FEL) by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2022. Subjects with prior trauma or surgery, facial nerve palsy, trans-blepharoplasty technique, and functional rather than cosmetic indications were excluded. Results There were 1060 subjects. Three patient factors (type of lift request, hairline height, and forehead skin type) were considered in the algorithm. The most frequent procedure in female subjects was conventional endoscopic FEL (83.8%) followed by DEL (9.3%). Male subjects most frequently had DEL (63.1%) followed by conventional endoscopic FEL (16.5%). Patient factors, but not age, were significantly ( p ≤ 0.001) different between the two sexes. While the above three patient factors and sex, but not age, had a significant effect ( p ≤ 0.001) on technique selection on univariate analysis, sex was the only factor that remained significant ( p ≤ 0.001) on multivariate analysis. Conclusion Endoscopic FEL was the first and second most frequent technique in female and male subjects, respectively. DEL was the first and second most frequent technique in male and female subjects, respectively. Sex, but not age, was a significant factor affecting the type of lift technique through three patient factors. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
BackgroundMany different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors drive technique selection.ObjectivesTo compare frequency of different forehead and/or eyebrow lift techniques between sexes, analyze factors affecting technique selection, and present an algorithm for technique selection.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of consecutive cosmetic patients who underwent direct eyebrow lift (DEL) or forehead/eyebrow lift (FEL) by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2022. Subjects with prior trauma or surgery, facial nerve palsy, trans-blepharoplasty technique, and functional rather than cosmetic indications were excluded.ResultsThere were 1060 subjects. Three patient factors (type of lift request, hairline height, and forehead skin type) were considered in the algorithm. The most frequent procedure in female subjects was conventional endoscopic FEL (83.8%) followed by DEL (9.3%). Male subjects most frequently had DEL (63.1%) followed by conventional endoscopic FEL (16.5%). Patient factors, but not age, were significantly (p ≤ 0.001) different between the two sexes. While the above three patient factors and sex, but not age, had a significant effect (p ≤ 0.001) on technique selection on univariate analysis, sex was the only factor that remained significant (p ≤ 0.001) on multivariate analysis.ConclusionEndoscopic FEL was the first and second most frequent technique in female and male subjects, respectively. DEL was the first and second most frequent technique in male and female subjects, respectively. Sex, but not age, was a significant factor affecting the type of lift technique through three patient factors.Level of Evidence IVThis journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Many different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors drive technique selection. To compare frequency of different forehead and/or eyebrow lift techniques between sexes, analyze factors affecting technique selection, and present an algorithm for technique selection. This is a retrospective study of consecutive cosmetic patients who underwent direct eyebrow lift (DEL) or forehead/eyebrow lift (FEL) by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2022. Subjects with prior trauma or surgery, facial nerve palsy, trans-blepharoplasty technique, and functional rather than cosmetic indications were excluded. There were 1060 subjects. Three patient factors (type of lift request, hairline height, and forehead skin type) were considered in the algorithm. The most frequent procedure in female subjects was conventional endoscopic FEL (83.8%) followed by DEL (9.3%). Male subjects most frequently had DEL (63.1%) followed by conventional endoscopic FEL (16.5%). Patient factors, but not age, were significantly (p ≤ 0.001) different between the two sexes. While the above three patient factors and sex, but not age, had a significant effect (p ≤ 0.001) on technique selection on univariate analysis, sex was the only factor that remained significant (p ≤ 0.001) on multivariate analysis. Endoscopic FEL was the first and second most frequent technique in female and male subjects, respectively. DEL was the first and second most frequent technique in male and female subjects, respectively. Sex, but not age, was a significant factor affecting the type of lift technique through three patient factors. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Many different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors drive technique selection.BACKGROUNDMany different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors drive technique selection.To compare frequency of different forehead and/or eyebrow lift techniques between sexes, analyze factors affecting technique selection, and present an algorithm for technique selection.OBJECTIVESTo compare frequency of different forehead and/or eyebrow lift techniques between sexes, analyze factors affecting technique selection, and present an algorithm for technique selection.This is a retrospective study of consecutive cosmetic patients who underwent direct eyebrow lift (DEL) or forehead/eyebrow lift (FEL) by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2022. Subjects with prior trauma or surgery, facial nerve palsy, trans-blepharoplasty technique, and functional rather than cosmetic indications were excluded.METHODSThis is a retrospective study of consecutive cosmetic patients who underwent direct eyebrow lift (DEL) or forehead/eyebrow lift (FEL) by a single surgeon between 2007 and 2022. Subjects with prior trauma or surgery, facial nerve palsy, trans-blepharoplasty technique, and functional rather than cosmetic indications were excluded.There were 1060 subjects. Three patient factors (type of lift request, hairline height, and forehead skin type) were considered in the algorithm. The most frequent procedure in female subjects was conventional endoscopic FEL (83.8%) followed by DEL (9.3%). Male subjects most frequently had DEL (63.1%) followed by conventional endoscopic FEL (16.5%). Patient factors, but not age, were significantly (p ≤ 0.001) different between the two sexes. While the above three patient factors and sex, but not age, had a significant effect (p ≤ 0.001) on technique selection on univariate analysis, sex was the only factor that remained significant (p ≤ 0.001) on multivariate analysis.RESULTSThere were 1060 subjects. Three patient factors (type of lift request, hairline height, and forehead skin type) were considered in the algorithm. The most frequent procedure in female subjects was conventional endoscopic FEL (83.8%) followed by DEL (9.3%). Male subjects most frequently had DEL (63.1%) followed by conventional endoscopic FEL (16.5%). Patient factors, but not age, were significantly (p ≤ 0.001) different between the two sexes. While the above three patient factors and sex, but not age, had a significant effect (p ≤ 0.001) on technique selection on univariate analysis, sex was the only factor that remained significant (p ≤ 0.001) on multivariate analysis.Endoscopic FEL was the first and second most frequent technique in female and male subjects, respectively. DEL was the first and second most frequent technique in male and female subjects, respectively. Sex, but not age, was a significant factor affecting the type of lift technique through three patient factors.CONCLUSIONEndoscopic FEL was the first and second most frequent technique in female and male subjects, respectively. DEL was the first and second most frequent technique in male and female subjects, respectively. Sex, but not age, was a significant factor affecting the type of lift technique through three patient factors.This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IVThis journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Author Clark, Jeremy D.
Bhat, Nita
Compton, Christopher J.
Kashkouli, Mohsen B.
Feist, Jack E.
Dugan, S. Elizabeth
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jack E.
  surname: Feist
  fullname: Feist, Jack E.
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Mohsen B.
  orcidid: 0000-0003-0347-5549
  surname: Kashkouli
  fullname: Kashkouli, Mohsen B.
  email: mkashkouli2@gmail.com
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine
– sequence: 3
  givenname: S. Elizabeth
  surname: Dugan
  fullname: Dugan, S. Elizabeth
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Nita
  surname: Bhat
  fullname: Bhat, Nita
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Christopher J.
  surname: Compton
  fullname: Compton, Christopher J.
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Jeremy D.
  surname: Clark
  fullname: Clark, Jeremy D.
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville School of Medicine
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40016580$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1URLeFF-CALHHhEjq2Y8fhtlp1C9JKrUSRuFmOM9lNlbUXOyntCV6jr8eT4GULSBw4zRy-f-bX_5-QIx88EvKSwVsGUJ0lAK5UAVwWUFZcFXdPyIyVgheSl-yIzECosuBMfT4mJyndADBeVeUzclzmVUkNM_Jtad0YYqLzrkM39n5Nxw3SxSb0Dmno6CKkLY69o8sQcYO2pda3ZyHS83tsYvhKV3030mt0G99_mfAdnXt66aYhdNb1dqBXg017-ccprjH4H98fEr3CmHb7b7f4nDzt7JDwxeM8JZ-W59eL98Xq8uLDYr4qnOBqLFBld2XLnIQGXKV1LQVKZ7GDWjkNUjfa1boEx6VuQSOqurEN1FjVQkMrTsmbw91dDNlmGs22Tw6HwXoMUzKCVZwrzaHO6Ot_0JswRZ_dGZHDrGvNuczUq0dqarbYml3stzbem9_RZoAfABdDShG7PwgDs-_PHPozuT_zqz9zl0XiIEoZ9muMf3__R_UTNZaecQ
Cites_doi 10.18502/jovr.v15i2.6740
10.1016/j.amjoto.2011.11.007
10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d9f37
10.1016/j.joco.2018.04.005
10.1097/PRS.0000000000006238
10.1080/08820538.2022.2053727
10.1001/archfaci.2009.109
10.3109/01676830903104652
10.1067/maj.2002.122939
10.1097/00006534-199411000-00006
10.1016/j.joco.2017.04.001
10.1097/IOP.0000000000002003
10.1016/j.cps.2012.06.004
10.1093/asj/sjad207
10.1097/01.PRS.0000071042.11435.2E
10.1097/PRS.0000000000009366
10.1067/maj.2002.121964
10.1097/IOP.0000000000001397
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2025 Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
2025. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
Copyright Springer Nature B.V. May 2025
Copyright_xml – notice: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2025 Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
– notice: 2025. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
– notice: Copyright Springer Nature B.V. May 2025
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.1007/s00266-025-04726-x
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1432-5241
EndPage 2726
ExternalDocumentID 40016580
10_1007_s00266_025_04726_x
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
-Y2
-~C
.55
.86
.GJ
.VR
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
199
1N0
1SB
2.D
203
23M
28-
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
36B
3O-
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5GY
5QI
5RE
5VS
67Z
6NX
78A
7X7
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANXM
AANZL
AAPKM
AAQQT
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBRH
ABBXA
ABDBE
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFSG
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHXU
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACUDM
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADHKG
ADIMF
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFIE
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEIIB
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AEZWR
AFBBN
AFDZB
AFEXP
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFOHR
AFQWF
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGQPQ
AGRTI
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHPBZ
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AIXLP
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARMRJ
ASPBG
ATHPR
AVWKF
AXYYD
AYFIA
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BBWZM
BDATZ
BENPR
BGNMA
BPHCQ
BSONS
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
EN4
ESBYG
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ7
GQ8
GRRUI
GXS
H13
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
I09
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
IWAJR
IXC
IXD
IXE
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KOW
KPH
L7B
LAS
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NB0
NDZJH
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OVD
P19
P2P
P9S
PF0
PHGZM
PHGZT
PMFND
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RIG
RNI
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S37
S3B
SAP
SCLPG
SDE
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
T16
TEORI
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UG4
UKHRP
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WJK
WK8
X7M
YLTOR
Z45
ZGI
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
~EX
AAYXX
ACSTC
AFHIU
AHWEU
CITATION
ABRTQ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-e6fec4d1c50b0c788953e5caef096c8058b8c9840c258d08ee69bab09e79380d3
IEDL.DBID U2A
ISSN 0364-216X
1432-5241
IngestDate Tue Aug 05 09:55:16 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 09:27:08 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:04:13 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 03 08:39:25 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 01:11:34 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 10
Keywords Upper face rejuvenation
Forehead and eyebrow lifting
Endoscopic forehead lift
Direct eyebrow lift
Endoscopic eyebrow lift
Language English
License 2025. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c326t-e6fec4d1c50b0c788953e5caef096c8058b8c9840c258d08ee69bab09e79380d3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-0347-5549
PMID 40016580
PQID 3216998225
PQPubID 54048
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_3172268209
proquest_journals_3216998225
pubmed_primary_40016580
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00266_025_04726_x
springer_journals_10_1007_s00266_025_04726_x
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20250500
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 5
  year: 2025
  text: 20250500
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace New York
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York
– name: United States
– name: Heidelberg
PublicationTitle Aesthetic plastic surgery
PublicationTitleAbbrev Aesth Plast Surg
PublicationTitleAlternate Aesthetic Plast Surg
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher Springer US
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer US
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References R Almousa (4726_CR6) 2009; 28
P Abdolalizadeh (4726_CR7) 2022; 37
MB Kashkouli (4726_CR8) 2019; 35
TZ Shipchandler (4726_CR11) 2012; 33
MB Kashkouli (4726_CR10) 2022; 38
RJE Ting (4726_CR9) 2020; 12
MB Kashkouli (4726_CR1) 2017; 29
LO Vásconez (4726_CR3) 2002; 22
AM Terella (4726_CR14) 2013; 40
ES Chiu (4726_CR15) 2003; 112
O Fisher (4726_CR16) 2010; 12
DM Coombs (4726_CR19) 2023; 44
N Iblher (4726_CR13) 2012; 130
RJ Rohrich (4726_CR18) 2019; 144
LO Vasconez (4726_CR5) 1994; 94
A de la Fuente (4726_CR17) 2002; 22
R Passot (4726_CR4) 1919; 27
H Aslan Gülbitti (4726_CR12) 2022; 150
MB Kashkouli (4726_CR20) 2018; 30
N Karimi (4726_CR2) 2020; 15
References_xml – volume: 15
  start-page: 218
  issue: 2
  year: 2020
  ident: 4726_CR2
  publication-title: J Ophthalmic Vis Res
  doi: 10.18502/jovr.v15i2.6740
– volume: 12
  issue: 8
  year: 2020
  ident: 4726_CR9
  publication-title: Cureus
– volume: 33
  start-page: 519
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  ident: 4726_CR11
  publication-title: Am J Otolaryngol
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2011.11.007
– volume: 130
  start-page: 830e
  issue: 6
  year: 2012
  ident: 4726_CR13
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d9f37
– volume: 30
  start-page: 99
  issue: 2
  year: 2018
  ident: 4726_CR20
  publication-title: J Curr Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2018.04.005
– volume: 144
  start-page: 1305
  issue: 6
  year: 2019
  ident: 4726_CR18
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006238
– volume: 37
  start-page: 651
  issue: 5
  year: 2022
  ident: 4726_CR7
  publication-title: Semin Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1080/08820538.2022.2053727
– volume: 12
  start-page: 56
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 4726_CR16
  publication-title: Arch Facial Plast Surg
  doi: 10.1001/archfaci.2009.109
– volume: 28
  start-page: 347
  issue: 6
  year: 2009
  ident: 4726_CR6
  publication-title: Orbit
  doi: 10.3109/01676830903104652
– volume: 22
  start-page: 113
  issue: 2
  year: 2002
  ident: 4726_CR17
  publication-title: Aesthet Surg J
  doi: 10.1067/maj.2002.122939
– volume: 94
  start-page: 788
  issue: 6
  year: 1994
  ident: 4726_CR5
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/00006534-199411000-00006
– volume: 29
  start-page: 154
  issue: 3
  year: 2017
  ident: 4726_CR1
  publication-title: J Curr Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.04.001
– volume: 38
  start-page: 138
  issue: 2
  year: 2022
  ident: 4726_CR10
  publication-title: Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002003
– volume: 40
  start-page: 105
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 4726_CR14
  publication-title: Clin Plast Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2012.06.004
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2023
  ident: 4726_CR19
  publication-title: Aesthet Surg J
  doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad207
– volume: 112
  start-page: 628
  issue: 2
  year: 2003
  ident: 4726_CR15
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000071042.11435.2E
– volume: 27
  start-page: 258
  year: 1919
  ident: 4726_CR4
  publication-title: Presse Med
– volume: 150
  start-page: 289
  issue: 2
  year: 2022
  ident: 4726_CR12
  publication-title: Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009366
– volume: 22
  start-page: 69
  issue: 1
  year: 2002
  ident: 4726_CR3
  publication-title: Aesthet Surg J
  doi: 10.1067/maj.2002.121964
– volume: 35
  start-page: 581
  issue: 6
  year: 2019
  ident: 4726_CR8
  publication-title: Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg
  doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001397
SSID ssj0012774
Score 2.4003694
Snippet Background Many different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what...
Many different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what factors...
BackgroundMany different endoscopic and non-endoscopic techniques for forehead and/or eyebrow lift exist, but to date there has been little research on what...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 2720
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Cohort Studies
Endoscopy
Endoscopy - methods
Esthetics
Eyebrows
Female
Females
Forehead - surgery
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Original Articles
Otorhinolaryngology
Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data
Plastic Surgery
Rejuvenation - physiology
Retrospective Studies
Rhytidoplasty - methods
Risk Assessment
Sexes
Surgeons
Treatment Outcome
Title Factors Affecting the Choice of Cosmetic Forehead and/or Eyebrow Lift Technique: An Oculofacial Plastic Surgeon’s Perspective
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00266-025-04726-x
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40016580
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3216998225
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3172268209
Volume 49
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwEB6hVkJcEOUZKJWRuIGF12sndm_papcKaKlEV1pOkeOHigQx6u4KOLV_g7_HL2GcTVKhwoFTDpk4kT8_vsnMfAZ4XmgrhSlyOhLcU1EYRY0TgY6N0ErUIoRWUujoOD-cizcLueiKwpZ9tnsfkmxX6qHYLbkLKWFW0qRwmFNkjtsSffeUyDXn5RA74EXRiUYJykf5oiuV-Xsbf25H1zjmtfhou-3M7sDtji-ScgPwDtzwzV24edRFxO_BxWxzYA4p28QMbIMgpSOTs4grAImBTOLySypUJOkQTlx5HTGNexXPyfQHusPxG3n3KazIaS_luk_Khry3688xmPQ3nZwgvU6Pf0j107H5dflzSU6uKjTvw3w2PZ0c0u5QBWqRqa2oz_FrhBtZyWpm0QHWcuylNT6gM2MVk6pWFmFilkvlmPI-17WpmfY4kxVz4wew1cTGPwISjA5IoGq0YMKjeTHSjnMdnEM7HzJ40fdt9XWjnVENKsktEhUiUbVIVN8z2O27v-rm0bIaI4A6SQzKDJ4Nt3EGpLCGaXxcow1yMJ4jk9EZPNzANrxOJEorFcvgZY_jVeP__pbH_2f-BG7xdkylPMhd2Fqdr_1T5Cqreg-2y9nBwXG6vv74drrXDtXfr8PknQ
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Pb9MwFH8aQ4JdEP_JGGAkOIFF6tqJjcShKqs61o5JtFJvmePYYhIk09pq22n7Gtz5ZHwSnt0kExocOOycF8fy7z379_L-GOBVqozgOk1ohzNLeaol1QV3tKu5kjznzoWWQuO9ZDjln2ZitgY_m1qYkO3ehCTDTt0Wu3l3wSfMCuo7HCb0tE6l3LVnJ-iozT_sfERUXzM22J70h7S-S4AaJCgLahNnDS86RsR5bNDvU6JrhdHWIYc3MhYylwZnFxsmZBFLaxOV6zxWFhVYxkUXx70BN5F8SG87U9ZrYxUsTesmVZyyTjKrS3P-Puc_j78rnPZKPDYcc4O7cKfmp6S3Uqh7sGbL-3BrXEfgH8D5YHVBD-mFRBAcgyCFJP2vFe44pHKkX82_-8JI4i_9xJ2-ILos3lXHZPsM3e_qhIwO3YJMmtax70mvJJ_N8lvltP97T_aRzvvXv_h67ar8dfFjTvYvK0IfwvRaFv4RrJdVaZ8AcVo5JGw5SsTconjaUQVjyhUFylkXwZtmbbOjVa-OrO3KHJDIEIksIJGdRrDVLH9W2-086yKAyrc0FBG8bB-jxfkwii5ttUQZ5HwsQeakIni8gq39HPcUWsg4grcNjpeD_3sum_8n_gJuDyfjUTba2dt9Chss6JfPwdyC9cXx0j5DnrTInwc1JXBw3XbxG6LQHv8
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VIlVcEG8CBYwEJ7DW67WTGInDattVSx-sRFfaW3D8EEiQVN2s2p7gb_Av-E38EsZ5Vahw4NBzJo7lmbG_ycx8BniRKCOFTmI6FNxRkeiUais8HWmhUpEL72tKoYPDeGcu3i3kYg1-dr0wdbV7l5JsehoCS1NRDY6tH_SNbyF0CMWzkga2w5ietWWVe-78FIO25dvdLdTwS86n20eTHdreK0ANgpWKutg7I-zQSJYzgzGgkiMnjXYe8bxJmUzz1OBMmeEytSx1Lla5zplyaMwpsyMc9xpcF6H7GD1ozsd93oInSUtYJSgfxou2Tefvc_7zKLyEby_lZusjb3oLbrZYlYwb47oNa664AxsHbTb-LnybNpf1kHFdFIJjEISTZPKpxN2HlJ5MyuXX0CRJwgWguOtbogs7KE_I9jmG4uUp2f_sK3LU0ci-IeOCvDerL6XX4U8-mSG0D69_CL3bZfHr-48lmV10h96D-ZUs_H1YL8rCPQTitfII3nKUYMKheDJUlnPlrUU55yN41a1tdtzwdmQ9Q3OtiQw1kdWayM4i2OyWP2t9eJmNUIEq0BvKCJ73j9H7QkpFF65coQziPx4jilIRPGjU1n9OBDgtUxbB606PF4P_ey6P_k_8GWzMtqbZ_u7h3mO4wWvzCuWYm7BenazcE4RMVf60tlICH6_aLX4DO10jMg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors+Affecting+the+Choice+of+Cosmetic+Forehead+and%2For+Eyebrow+Lift+Technique%3A+An+Oculofacial+Plastic+Surgeon%E2%80%99s+Perspective&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic+plastic+surgery&rft.date=2025-05-01&rft.pub=Springer+Nature+B.V&rft.issn=0364-216X&rft.eissn=1432-5241&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2720&rft.epage=2726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00266-025-04726-x&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0364-216X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0364-216X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0364-216X&client=summon