Nocturnal Glucose Profile According to Timing of Dinner Rapid Insulin and Basal and Rapid Insulin Type: An Insulclock ® Connected Insulin Cap-Based Real-World Study

• Published in: Biomedicines Vol. 12; no. 7; p. 1600
• Main Authors: Gómez-Peralta, Fernando, Valledor, Xoan, Abreu, Cristina, Fernández-Rubio, Elsa, Cotovad, Laura, Pujante, Pedro, Azriel, Sharona, Pérez-González, Jesús, Vallejo, Alba, Ruiz-Valdepeñas, Luis, Corcoy, Rosa
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 18.07.2024
• Subjects: Algorithms; Clinical trials; connected insulin pen cap; Diabetes; Diabetes mellitus (insulin dependent); Glucose monitoring; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; nocturnal hyperglycemia; nocturnal hypoglycemia; Quality of life; second-generation basal insulin; ultrarapid insulin; Spain; ultrarapid insulin; nocturnal hypoglycemia; nocturnal hyperglycemia; second-generation basal insulin; connected insulin pen cap
• DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12071600
• ISSN: 2227-9059

A study to assess the glucose levels of people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) overnight, based on the insulin type and timing. A real-world, retrospective study of T1D, using multiple daily insulin injections. Continuous glucose monitoring and insulin injection data were collected for ten hours after dinner using the connected cap. Meal events were identified using the ROC detection methodology. The timing of the rapid insulin, second injections, and the type of insulin analogs used, were evaluated. The nocturnal profiles (n = 775, 49 subjects) were analyzed. A higher glucose AUC of over 180 mg/dL was observed in subjects with delayed injections (number; %; mg/dL × h): -45-15 min (n = 136; 17.5%, 175.9 ± 271.0); -15-0 min (n = 231; 29.8%, 164.0 ± 2 37.1); 0 + 45 min (n = 408; 52.6%, 203.6 ± 260.9), ( = 0.049). The use of ultrarapid insulin (FiAsp ) (URI) vs. rapid insulin (RI) analogs was associated with less hypoglycemia events (7.1 vs. 13.6%; = 0.005) and TBR70 (1.7 ± 6.9 vs. 4.6 ± 13.9%; = 0.003). Users of glargine U300 vs. degludec had a higher TIR (70.7 vs. 58.5%) (adjusted R-squared: 0.22, < 0.001). The use of a correction injection (n = 144, 18.6%) was associated with a higher number of hypoglycemia events (18.1 vs. 9.5%; = 0.003), TBR70 (5.5 ± 14.2 vs. 3.0 ± 11.1%; = 0.003), a glucose AUC of over 180 mg/dL (226.1 ± 257.8 vs. 178.0 ± 255.3 mg/dL × h; = 0.001), and a lower TIR (56.0 ± 27.4 vs. 62.7 ± 29.6 mg/dL × h; = 0.004). The dinner rapid insulin timing, insulin type, and the use of correction injections affect the nocturnal glucose profile in T1D.