Transabdominal ultrasound is appropriate
Preterm birth remains a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. A short cervix is strongly associated with spontaneous preterm birth. Professional organizations support cervical length screening for singleton gestations with a prior spontaneous preterm birth and second-trimester cervical l...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology Vol. 215; no. 6; pp. 739 - 743.e1 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.12.2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Preterm birth remains a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. A short cervix is strongly associated with spontaneous preterm birth. Professional organizations support cervical length screening for singleton gestations with a prior spontaneous preterm birth and second-trimester cervical length measurements between 16-24 weeks. All interventions used to decrease the risk of preterm birth in women with a short cervix are based on clinical trials that used transvaginal cervical length measurement, but transabdominal ultrasound has been shown to correlate well with transvaginal measurement in some observational studies. Transvaginal cervical length measurement is more accurate and more reliably obtained than the transabdominal approach. Conversely, transabdominal ultrasound could have the advantage of ease of implementation and, in general, is perceived by patients to be associated with less discomfort. Currently, there is no randomized clinical study that compares head-to-head the effectiveness of transvaginal vs transabdominal ultrasound for preterm birth risk screening. This point/counterpoint article summarizes the pros and cons of the 2 ultrasound approaches and debates whether transvaginal ultrasound should be used exclusively or if transabdominal ultrasound can be incorporated in cervical length screening for prevention of preterm birth. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Preterm birth remains a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. A short cervix is strongly associated with spontaneous preterm birth. Professional organizations support cervical length screening for singleton gestations with a prior spontaneous preterm birth and second-trimester cervical length measurements between 16-24 weeks. All interventions used to decrease the risk of preterm birth in women with a short cervix are based on clinical trials that used transvaginal cervical length measurement, but transabdominal ultrasound has been shown to correlate well with transvaginal measurement in some observational studies. Transvaginal cervical length measurement is more accurate and more reliably obtained than the transabdominal approach. Conversely, transabdominal ultrasound could have the advantage of ease of implementation and, in general, is perceived by patients to be associated with less discomfort. Currently, there is no randomized clinical study that compares head-to-head the effectiveness of transvaginal vs transabdominal ultrasound for preterm birth risk screening. This point/counterpoint article summarizes the pros and cons of the 2 ultrasound approaches and debates whether transvaginal ultrasound should be used exclusively or if transabdominal ultrasound can be incorporated in cervical length screening for prevention of preterm birth. |
Author | Stamilio, David, MD Carlson, Laura M., MD |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Stamilio, David, MD – sequence: 2 fullname: Carlson, Laura M., MD |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27888999$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kU9rGzEQxUVxSew0X6CH4qMvux1JG_2BUAgmaQKGHpqehVYaF23XK1faDeTbR4vTHHrISSN4783Mb1ZkMcQBCflMoaZAxdeutl38XbNS1yBrYPCBLCloWQkl1IIsAYBVmkt1TlY5d_OXaXZGzplUSmmtl2TzmOyQbevjIQy2X0_9mGyO0-DXIa_t8ZjiMQU74ifycW_7jJev7wX5dXf7uL2vdj--P2xvdpXjTIyV4I1m7ZztqKcgdau4c947pygq2UgLewmt9dw6JhxthWcAjqNQe02bhl-QzSm3dP47YR7NIWSHfW8HjFM2VBXRldBqlrKT1KWYc8K9KaMebHo2FMxMyHRmJmRmQgakKYSK6ctr_tQe0L9Z_iEpguuTAMuWTwGTyS7g4NCHhG40Pob387_9Z3d9GIKz_R98xtzFKRXOZQ-TmQHzcz7KfCIqODRXjeYvoRSNAw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2018_09_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2019_01_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2019_06_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2017_02_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2019_05_051 crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v11_i13_2945 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jogc_2020_09_011 crossref_primary_10_1002_ajum_12303 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s00404-014-3229-1 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723b1b 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00094.x 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.09020091.x 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01225.x 10.1111/ajo.12204 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00010.x 10.1056/NEJMoa067815 10.1097/OGX.0b013e318270d5b2 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.12.021 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.013 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.12.005 10.1002/uog.9017 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00345.x 10.7863/jum.2008.27.9.1305 10.1002/uog.8911 10.3109/14767058.2012.657278 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Elsevier Inc. 2016 Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Elsevier Inc. – notice: 2016 Elsevier Inc. – notice: Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1097-6868 |
EndPage | 743.e1 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_j_ajog_2016_07_020 27888999 S0002937816304549 1_s2_0_S0002937816304549 |
Genre | Editorial Commentary |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M -ET .1- .55 .FO .GJ .XZ .~1 0R~ 0SF 1B1 1CY 1P~ 1~. 1~5 23M 2KS 354 3O- 4.4 457 4CK 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 7-5 85S 8F7 8P~ AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAIKC AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAMNW AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYJJ ABBQC ABCQX ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABMAC ABMZM ABOCM ABPMR ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD ADOJD ADVLN AEBSH AEFWE AEKER AENEX AEVXI AFCHL AFCTW AFFNX AFJKZ AFKWA AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGNAY AGUBO AGYEJ AI. AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJOXV AJRQY AJUYK AKRWK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ANZVX ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV C45 C5W CAG COF CS3 EBS EFJIC EJD EO8 EX3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q G8K GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IH2 IHE J1W K-O KOM LPU M41 MO0 N4W N9A NCXOZ NEJ NQ- O-L O9- OAUVE OBH OCB OGEVE OHH OHT OMK OQ. OVD P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PH~ Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ RXW SDF SEL SES SEW SJN SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K TAE TEORI TWZ UDS UGJ UHB UHS UHU UKR UNMZH UV1 VH1 VVN WH7 WOQ WOW X6Y X7M XFW YFH YOC YYQ YZZ Z5R ZGI ZXP ZY1 ~G- ~H1 AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ AFDAS AHPSJ AJBFU EFLBG LCYCR ZA5 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX ABDPE ACRPL ADNMO CITATION 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-63492b8999c1d1079b83ccddcc81e8747a0f70bad3ac26c1b6d200c3e68f91443 |
IEDL.DBID | AIKHN |
ISSN | 0002-9378 |
IngestDate | Fri Oct 25 03:42:09 EDT 2024 Fri Dec 06 02:32:36 EST 2024 Sat Sep 28 08:49:03 EDT 2024 Fri Feb 23 02:29:20 EST 2024 Tue Oct 15 14:37:45 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Keywords | prematurity ultrasound cervical length transabdominal transvaginal |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c326t-63492b8999c1d1079b83ccddcc81e8747a0f70bad3ac26c1b6d200c3e68f91443 |
Notes | SourceType-Other Sources-1 content type line 63 ObjectType-Editorial-2 ObjectType-Commentary-1 |
PMID | 27888999 |
PQID | 1844356984 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1844356984 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2016_07_020 pubmed_primary_27888999 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ajog_2016_07_020 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0002937816304549 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-12-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2016 text: 2016-12-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Am J Obstet Gynecol |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Fonseca, Celik, Parra, Singh, Nicolaides (bib17) 2007; 357 Bennett, Richards (bib13) 2000; 15 Hassan, Romero, Vidyadhari (bib18) 2011; 38 Friedman, Srinivas, Parry, Elovitz, Wang, Schwartz (bib4) 2013; 208 Braithwaite, Economides (bib14) 1997; 9 Rhoades, Park, Stout, Macones, Cahill, Tuuli (bib5) 2016; 33 Miller, Grobman (bib9) 2013; 209 Hernandez-Andrade, Romero, Ahn (bib8) 2012; 25 Saul, Kurtzman, Hagemann, Ghamsary, Wing (bib3) 2008; 27 To, Skentou, Cicero, Nicolaides (bib6) 2000; 15 Stone, Chan, McCowan, Taylor, Mitchell (bib2) 2010; 50 Marren, Mogra, Pedersen, Walter, Ogle, Hyett (bib7) 2014; 54 Cahill, Odibo, Caughey (bib10) 2010; 202 (bib1) 2012; 120 Cicero, Skentou, Souka, To, Nicolaides (bib16) 2001; 17 Werner, Han, Pettker (bib11) 2011; 38 Berghella (bib12) 2012; 67 Gauthier, Marin, Garuchet-Bigot (bib15) 2014; 290 28213058 - Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):621-622 28213062 - Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):622 Marren (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib7) 2014; 54 (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib1) 2012; 120 Miller (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib9) 2013; 209 Hernandez-Andrade (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib8) 2012; 25 Rhoades (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib5) 2016; 33 Werner (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib11) 2011; 38 Saul (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib3) 2008; 27 Cahill (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib10) 2010; 202 Gauthier (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib15) 2014; 290 Bennett (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib13) 2000; 15 Friedman (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib4) 2013; 208 Stone (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib2) 2010; 50 Cicero (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib16) 2001; 17 Berghella (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib12) 2012; 67 Braithwaite (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib14) 1997; 9 Hassan (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib18) 2011; 38 Fonseca (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib17) 2007; 357 To (10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib6) 2000; 15 |
References_xml | – volume: 38 start-page: 18 year: 2011 end-page: 31 ident: bib18 article-title: Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol contributor: fullname: Vidyadhari – volume: 120 start-page: 964 year: 2012 end-page: 973 ident: bib1 article-title: Prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Practice bulletin no. 130 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 208 start-page: 190.e1 year: 2013 end-page: 190.e7 ident: bib4 article-title: Can transabdominal ultrasound be used as a screening test for short cervical length? publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol contributor: fullname: Schwartz – volume: 9 start-page: 91 year: 1997 end-page: 93 ident: bib14 article-title: Acceptability by patients of transvaginal sonography in the elective assessment of the first-trimester fetus publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol contributor: fullname: Economides – volume: 33 start-page: 473 year: 2016 end-page: 479 ident: bib5 article-title: Can transabdominal cervical length measurement exclude short cervix? publication-title: Am J Perinatol contributor: fullname: Tuuli – volume: 25 start-page: 1682 year: 2012 end-page: 1689 ident: bib8 article-title: Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med contributor: fullname: Ahn – volume: 202 start-page: 548.e1 year: 2010 end-page: 548.e8 ident: bib10 article-title: Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol contributor: fullname: Caughey – volume: 27 start-page: 1305 year: 2008 end-page: 1311 ident: bib3 article-title: Is transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method of cervical length assessment? publication-title: J Ultrasound Med contributor: fullname: Wing – volume: 290 start-page: 465 year: 2014 end-page: 469 ident: bib15 article-title: Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurement and preterm labor publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet contributor: fullname: Garuchet-Bigot – volume: 50 start-page: 523 year: 2010 end-page: 527 ident: bib2 article-title: Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population publication-title: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol contributor: fullname: Mitchell – volume: 67 start-page: 653 year: 2012 end-page: 658 ident: bib12 article-title: Universal cervical length screening for prediction and prevention of preterm birth publication-title: Obstet Gynecol Surv contributor: fullname: Berghella – volume: 17 start-page: 335 year: 2001 end-page: 340 ident: bib16 article-title: Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol contributor: fullname: Nicolaides – volume: 15 start-page: 52 year: 2000 end-page: 55 ident: bib13 article-title: Patient acceptance of endovaginal ultrasound publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol contributor: fullname: Richards – volume: 357 start-page: 462 year: 2007 end-page: 469 ident: bib17 article-title: Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix publication-title: N Engl J Med contributor: fullname: Nicolaides – volume: 15 start-page: 292 year: 2000 end-page: 296 ident: bib6 article-title: Cervical assessment at the routine 23-weeks' scan: problems with transabdominal sonography publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol contributor: fullname: Nicolaides – volume: 209 start-page: 546.e1 year: 2013 end-page: 546.e6 ident: bib9 article-title: Cost-effectiveness of transabdominal ultrasound for cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol contributor: fullname: Grobman – volume: 38 start-page: 32 year: 2011 end-page: 37 ident: bib11 article-title: Universal cervical-length screening to prevent preterm birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol contributor: fullname: Pettker – volume: 54 start-page: 250 year: 2014 end-page: 255 ident: bib7 article-title: Ultrasound assessment of cervical length at 18-21 weeks' gestation in an Australian obstetric population: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal approaches publication-title: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol contributor: fullname: Hyett – volume: 290 start-page: 465 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib15 article-title: Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurement and preterm labor publication-title: Arch Gynecol Obstet doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3229-1 contributor: fullname: Gauthier – volume: 120 start-page: 964 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib1 article-title: Prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Practice bulletin no. 130 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182723b1b – volume: 15 start-page: 292 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib6 article-title: Cervical assessment at the routine 23-weeks' scan: problems with transabdominal sonography publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00094.x contributor: fullname: To – volume: 9 start-page: 91 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib14 article-title: Acceptability by patients of transvaginal sonography in the elective assessment of the first-trimester fetus publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.09020091.x contributor: fullname: Braithwaite – volume: 50 start-page: 523 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib2 article-title: Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population publication-title: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01225.x contributor: fullname: Stone – volume: 54 start-page: 250 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib7 article-title: Ultrasound assessment of cervical length at 18-21 weeks' gestation in an Australian obstetric population: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal approaches publication-title: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1111/ajo.12204 contributor: fullname: Marren – volume: 15 start-page: 52 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib13 article-title: Patient acceptance of endovaginal ultrasound publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00010.x contributor: fullname: Bennett – volume: 357 start-page: 462 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib17 article-title: Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067815 contributor: fullname: Fonseca – volume: 33 start-page: 473 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib5 article-title: Can transabdominal cervical length measurement exclude short cervix? publication-title: Am J Perinatol contributor: fullname: Rhoades – volume: 67 start-page: 653 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib12 article-title: Universal cervical length screening for prediction and prevention of preterm birth publication-title: Obstet Gynecol Surv doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e318270d5b2 contributor: fullname: Berghella – volume: 208 start-page: 190.e1 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib4 article-title: Can transabdominal ultrasound be used as a screening test for short cervical length? publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.12.021 contributor: fullname: Friedman – volume: 209 start-page: 546.e1 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib9 article-title: Cost-effectiveness of transabdominal ultrasound for cervical length screening for preterm birth prevention publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.013 contributor: fullname: Miller – volume: 202 start-page: 548.e1 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib10 article-title: Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.12.005 contributor: fullname: Cahill – volume: 38 start-page: 18 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib18 article-title: Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.9017 contributor: fullname: Hassan – volume: 17 start-page: 335 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib16 article-title: Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00345.x contributor: fullname: Cicero – volume: 27 start-page: 1305 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib3 article-title: Is transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method of cervical length assessment? publication-title: J Ultrasound Med doi: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.9.1305 contributor: fullname: Saul – volume: 38 start-page: 32 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib11 article-title: Universal cervical-length screening to prevent preterm birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.8911 contributor: fullname: Werner – volume: 25 start-page: 1682 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020_bib8 article-title: Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.657278 contributor: fullname: Hernandez-Andrade |
SSID | ssj0002292 |
Score | 2.3077214 |
Snippet | Preterm birth remains a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. A short cervix is strongly associated with spontaneous preterm birth. Professional... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 739 |
SubjectTerms | Abdominal Wall cervical length Cervical Length Measurement - methods Cervix Uteri - diagnostic imaging Female Humans Obstetrics and Gynecology Pregnancy Pregnancy Trimester, Second Premature Birth - prevention & control prematurity Risk Assessment transabdominal transvaginal ultrasound Vagina |
Title | Transabdominal ultrasound is appropriate |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0002937816304549 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.020 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27888999 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1844356984 |
Volume | 215 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LS8NAEB76APEivq2PEsGDILHJJk13j6VYqtKeLPS27CtSkbY06dXf7myyKYiPg8ckLJv9ZnfmG3YeADcyFYwpqf2UEenHUihfyET7Me3qlGik6EU5hvEkGU3jp1l3VoNBlQtjwyqd7i91eqGt3ZuOQ7Ozms9tjm-AtqpHkVHYOnKsDk00R_auttl_fB5NtgqZEEYqFmwHuNyZMsxLvC1fbYRXWcPTtv3-2T79xj8LOzTchz1HIL1--Y8HUDOLQ9gZuyvyI7gtrI-Qelm06_I27_laZLZ5kjfPvKKE-Ao3XW6OYTp8eBmMfNcOwVfIsXI_sYUEJfpHTIUavTYmaaSU1krR0FB0C0SQ9gIpdCQUSVSIkOMRUJFJaMrQb4pOoLFYLswZeOjnxVQTLaNQx_hFiMiwIBFIJ0yskrgFdxUIfFVWveBVONgbt5BxCxkPehwha0GvwolX-ZyogUzmjkPGQ54RHvBvImtBdzvyi9Q5KvQ_Z7yuxMHxONg7DrEwyw3ORHE53YRRXMNpKaftCoh19xG-83_OegG79qkMZrmERr7emCukJLlsQ_3-I2y7jfcJhi3d5w |
link.rule.ids | 314,780,784,4502,24116,27924,27925,45585,45679 |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1JS8NAFH7UCupF3K1rBA-CxCaTpTNHEUvVtqcWehtmi7RIW5r06m_3TZaKuBy8ZhIm872Z977HvAXgWiaCMSW1mzAi3VAK5QoZazekkU6IRoqel2Po9ePOMHweRaMaPFS5MDasstT9hU7PtXX5pFmi2ZyPxzbH10Nb1aLIKGwdObYG62GE7Bc39d37Z5wHIYxUHNi-XmbOFEFeYjJ7tfFdRQVP2_T7Z-v0G_vMrVB7B7ZL-ujcF3-4CzUz3YONXnlBvg83ue0RUs_yZl3O8i1biNS2TnLGqZMXEJ_jlsvMAQzbj4OHjls2Q3AVMqzMjW0ZQYneEVO-Rp-NSRoopbVS1DcUnQLhJS1PCh0IRWLlI-B4AFRgYpow9JqCQ6hPZ1NzDA56eSHVRMvA1yGOCBEY5sUCyYQJVRw24LYCgc-Lmhe8CgabcAsZt5Bxr8URsga0Kpx4lc2J-sek5WFIuc9Twj3-TWANiFZffpE5R3X-54xXlTg4HgZ7wyGmZrbEmSguJ4oZxTUcFXJarYBYZx_hO_nnrJew2Rn0urz71H85hS07UoS1nEE9WyzNOZKTTF7km-8DgQbewA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transabdominal+ultrasound+is+appropriate&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+obstetrics+and+gynecology&rft.au=Stamilio%2C+David&rft.au=Carlson%2C+Laura+M&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft.volume=215&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=739&rft.epage=743.e1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ajog.2016.07.020&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00029378%2FS0002937816X00130%2Fcov150h.gif |